The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published this week the results of an international research project on a possible future International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) for extractive activities in the form of a discussion paper - Extractive Activities.
A research team comprising members of the Australian, Canadian, Norwegian and South African accounting standard-setters analysed and discussed accounting for extractive activities with a wide range of stakeholders in order to identify a possible approach for a standard on the accounting for extractive activities. The discussion paper only contains the views of the project team - it does not represent the views of the Board. After considering the responses received on the discussion paper, the Board will decide whether to add the project to its active agenda.
Extractive activities are the activities undertaken by entities when searching for, and ultimately extracting, minerals, oil or natural gas. The area of extractive industries poses some very specific challenges resulting from the uncertainties that are faced by entities pursuing extractive activities: for instance assessing the quantities that may be found and the costs involved in accessing and extracting the resources.
The current standard, IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources, was issued in 2004 as an interim standard pending completion of this research project. Existing IFRSs do not specifically address the accounting for the development and production of minerals or oil and gas properties, and do not include specific disclosure requirements that would help users to assess the nature and extent of the risks involved in the extractive activities. Because of the lack of guidance on these issues, the accounting and disclosure practices of entities engaged in extractive activities often vary by industry, by jurisdiction, and by the size of the company.
The document published this week discusses how a possible standard on extractive activities could address these issues, thereby improving the relevance and comparability of financial statements. It also considers feedback received from the Publish What You Pay coalition following ongoing discussion with the group.