Revenue Tax Briefing

The content shown on this page is a Tax Briefing produced by the Irish Revenue Commissioners. To view the section of legislation to which the Tax Briefing applies, click the link below:

Revenue Tax Briefing Issue 51, October 2003

Losses, Charges & Group Relief

Section 420B

This section provides relief for group relief for relevant trading losses (as defined in Section 396B) and relevant trading charges on income (as defined in Section 243B)of a surrendering company for an accounting period which have not otherwise been relieved. This is done by reducing the corporation tax of a claimant company for the corresponding accounting period by an amount determined by applying the corporation tax rate applicable to the relevant trade (10% or16% for 2002) to the amount of the unrelieved relevant trade loss/charges on income available to be surrendered by means of group relief.

Accounting periods straddling 6 March 2001 (Section 55 Finance Act 2002)

Where an accounting period straddles 6 March 2001, the Finance Act 2002 amendment provides that, for the purpose of calculating the relevant losses or charges, the accounting period of the company is divided into two parts, one beginning on the date on which the accounting period begins and ending on 5 March 2001, with the other commencing on 6 March 2001 and ending on the date that the accounting period ends. It is important to note, however, that the splitting of the accounting period only applies for the purposes of determining the amounts which may be relieved under the section. Thus for example the loss available on a value basis is arrived at by apportioning the accounting period between the pre and post 6 March 2001 periods. However the loss relief thus computed may be claimed against the income of the whole accounting period.

Effective Date

The ring fence introduced by Section 90 FA 2001 and the relieving provisions introduced by Section 54 FA 2002 both take effect from 6 March 2001.

Length of Accounting Period

In the case of losses, it is important to note that a company can only shelter liabilities arising in prior periods equal in length to the accounting period in which the loss arose. Where a previous accounting period falls partly within this corresponding period, the corporation tax liability for that period must be apportioned and only that portion falling within the corresponding period can be sheltered under Section 396B(4).

Quantum of Relief

Where relief is being claimed in the prior period under Section 396B it is important to ensure that the correct tax rate is used in the calculation of the relief. For example, where relief is being claimed in 2002 for a loss arising in 2003 the correct rate to be used in the calculation is 12.5% and not 16%.

Order

Section 396Brelief is reduced by amounts already set off under Section 396 or 396A. One would expect Section 396A claims to be made in priority to Section 396Bclaims but this is not compulsory. Equally a company may claim Section 396B(3)(b) relief, i.e., relief at the standard rate, in priority to Section 396B(3)(a) relief, i.e., relief for 10% losses. This will impact on the loss available for carry forward. However relief under Section 396B is to be claimed in priority to relief available in respect of non-trade charges, expenses of management or other amounts claimable against profits with the exception of excess Case V allowances.

Losses in a leasing trade

It is also important to note that relief cannot be claimed under Section 396B in respect of a loss subject to the ring fence provisions of Section 403(4).

Order of Offset

The order of set-off of the relief is (i) Section 243B charges, (ii) Section 396B losses and (iii) Section 420B group relief.

Claims

How the losses, etc., on a value basis may be claimed in 2001 is dealt with in Tax Instruction 12.3.6. This instruction covers the situation in 2001 where the underlying computer programme applies the Finance Act 2001 ring-fence to relevant trade losses, charges and group relief but does not reflect the option for relief on a value basis introduced retrospectively by Finance Act 2002.

For 2002 the Form CT1 provides, at Part 8, for the option of claiming losses, charges and group relief on a value basis, i.e., Section 396B, Section 243B and Section 420B, and the underlying computer programme is fully compatible with this.

The operation of Section 54 FA 2002 is best illustrated by means of examples:

Example 1

A Ltd. Results as follows:

12 months ended 31/12/2002

Case V

125,000

excess Manufacturing trade charges

(25,000)

excess “relevant trade” charges

(275,000)

CT Computations

Case V @ 25%

31,250

S. 243B(3)(a) relief (25,000 @ 10%)

(2,500)

S. 243B(3)(b) relief (179,687 @ 16%)

(28,750)

Net CT liability

Nil

Loss forward (300, 000 - (25,000 + 179,687))

95,313

Example 2

C Ltd. Results as follows:

12 months ended 31/12/00

Case 1 (non-manufacturing)

50,000

12 months ended 31/12/01

Relevant trade losses

(48,000)

CT Computations:

Option 1 (S. 396A)

12 months ended 31/12/01

Case I Nil:

Liability

Nil

12 months ended 31/12/00

Case I

500,000

S. 396(2) relief (48,000 x 2/12)

(8,000)

S. 396A relief (48,000 x 10/12)

(40,000)

Net

2,000

CT due @ 12.5% (Section 22A)

250

Loss forward (48,000 - (8,000 + 40,000)

Nil

Option 2 (S. 396B)

12 months ended 31/12/01

Case I Nil:

Liability

Nil

12 months ended 31/12/00

Case I

500,000

S. 396(2) relief (48,000 x 2/12)

(8,000)

42,000

Liability after S. 396(2)relief

(Section 22A applies) 42,000 @ 12 ½ %

5,250

S. 396B relief 26,250 @ 20%

(5,250)

Liability

Nil

Loss forward (48,000 - (8,000 +26,250))

13,750

Note: Because this is a company to which Section 22A relief applies a S. 396B claim may be preferred to a S. 396A claim and some of the loss may be preserved as a loss forward.

Example 3

C Ltd. Results as follows :

12 months ended 31/12/00

Case I (non-manufacturing)

500,000

12 months ended 31/12/2001

relevant trade losses

(48,000)

CT Computations:

Option 1 (S. 396A)

12 months ended 31/12/01

Case I Nil:

Liability

Nil

12 months ended 31/12/00

Case I

500,000

S. 396(2) relief (48,000 x 2/12)

(8,000)

S. 396A relief (48,000 x 10/12)

(40,000)

452,000

Liability 452,000 @ 24%

108,480

Loss forward

(48,000 - (8,000 + 40,000))

Nil

Option 2 (S. 396B)

12 months ended 31/12/01

Case I Nil:

Liability

Nil

12 months ended 31/12/00

Case I

500,000

S. 396(2) relief (48,000 x 2/12)

(8,000)

492,000

Liability after S. 396(2) relief 492,000 @ 24 %

118,080

S. 396B relief 40,000 @ 20%

(8,000)

Liability

110,080

Loss forward

(48,000 - (8,000 + 40,000))

Nil

Note: It can be seen that in a “full-rate” company S. 396B relief is unlikely to be preferred to S. 396A.

Example 4

X Ltd. results as follows:

12 months ended 31/12/02

Relevant Trade Loss

(400,000)

9 months ended 31/12/01

Relevant Trade Profit

100,000

Case III

60,000

12 months ended 31/3/01

Relevant Trade Profit:

20,000

Case III

75,000

CT Computations:

12 months to 31/12/02

Nil

9 months to 31/12/01

Case I

100,000

Section 396A relief

100,000

Case III liability: 60,000 @ 25%

15,000

Section 396B relief 93,750 @ 16%

15,000

12 months to 31/3/01

Case I

20,000

Section 396A relief 20,000 x 3/12

(5,000)

Taxable Case I

15,000

Liability @ 12.5% (Section 22A)

1,875

(Note: No S. 396B relief claimed)

Case III liability: 75,000 @ 25%

18,750

Relief under section S. 396B 1s8,750 x 3/12

(4,687)

Net Case III Liability

14,063

Total liability (1,875 + 14,063)

15,938

Notes:

Full relief is not available in respect of 12 months to 31/3/01 as only 3 months fall within preceding period of corresponding length to the period in which loss arose i.e., 31/12/02.

Loss Summary

Loss 12 months to 31/12/02

(400,000)

Used 9 months to 31/12/01

Section 396A

100,000

Section 396B

93,750

Used 12 months to 31/3/01

Section 396(A)

5,000

Section 396B (4,687/16%)

29,294

Loss forward

171,956

Example 5

F Ltd. Results as follows

12 months ended 31/12/03

Relevant trade (non-10%) loss

(500,000)

Case III

250,000

Non-trade charges

200,000

CT Computation:

Case I

Nil

Case III

250,000

Non-trade charges

(200,000)

Taxable Profits 50,000 @ 25%

12,500

S. 396B relief 100,000 @ 12.5%

12,500

CT Payable

Nil

Relevant trade loss forward (see over)

Nil

Loss summary

S. 396B relief claimed

100,000

However, in accordance with Section 396B(5)(c)(ii), the amount of losses treated as used will be the amount which would have been treated as used if there were no non-trade charges i.e.

Case III 250,000 @ 25%

62,500

(500,000 @ 12.5%

62,500)

Loss treated as used: 500,000

Loss forward

Nil

Example 6

H Ltd. Results as follows:

12 months ended 31/12/02:

Relevant trade (non-10%) Profit

225,000

Case III

180,000

Trade charges

(75,000)

12 months ended 31/12/03

Relevant trade (non-10%) loss

(450,000)

Case III

180,000

Trade charges

(75,000)

CT Computation:

Year ended 31/12/2002

Case I

225,000

Trade charges

(75,000)

Net

150,000

Relief S. 396A

(150,000)

Case III

180,000

Taxable Profits 180,000 @ 25%

45,000

S. 396B relief 360,000 @ 12.5%

(45,000)

CT payable

Nil

Year ended 31/12/03

Case I

Nil

Case III

180,000

Taxable Profits 180,000 @ 25%

45,000

S. 396B relief 15,000 @ 12.5%

(1,875)

CT payable

43,125

Loss Summary

Loss 2003

(450,000)

Trade charges 2003

(75,000)

(525,000)

Used S. 396A 2002

150,000

Used S. 396B 2002

360,000

Used S. 396B 2003

15,000

Total

525,000

No loss forward

Example 7

Year ended 31/12/01

Loss in a manufacturing trade

(240,000)

Case V

10,000

Apportion the Manufacturing Loss

1/1/01 - 5/3/01: 240,000 x 2/12

(40,000)

(Ring-fenced: Section 455)

6/3/01 - 31/12/01: 240,000 x 10/12

(200,000)

(Relevant trade loss: S. 396A & S. 396B)

CT Computation:

Case V 10,000 @ 25%

2,500

S. 396B relief 25,000 @ 10%

(2,500)

CT Payable

Nil

Loss Summary

Total Loss

240,000

Used S. 396B 2001

(25,000)

Balance Loss

215,000

Ring-fenced to 10% trade

(40,000)

Relevant trade loss available for carry forward under S. 396(1) or for carry-back to previous accounting period on value basis (S. 396B(3)) = (175,000)

Example 8

Year ended 31/12/01

Relevant Trade Loss (100,000)

Chargeable gain: 200,000

Regross 200,000 x

20%

20%

200,000*

Apportion

1/1/01 - 5/3/01: 100,000 x 2/12

16,667

6/3/01 - 31/12/01: 100,000 x 10/12

83,333

CT Computation:

Chargeable gain: 200,000 @ 20%

40,000

S. 396(2) relief

(16,667)

S. 396B relief (83,333 @ 20%)

(16,667)

Tax payable

6,666

Loss forward

Nil

*Regrossed at standard rate of CT in accordance with Section 78 TCA 1997

Example 9

Period 1/9/00 - 31/8/01

Case V

60,000

Relevant trade (non-manufacturing) loss

(24,000)

CT Computation:

Case V

60,000

S. 396(2) relief (period 1/09/00 - 5/03/01)

24,000 x 6/12

(12,000)

Taxable

48,000

CT 48,000 @ 25%

12,000

S. 396B relief (period 6/3/01 - 31/8/01)

24,000 x 6/12 @ 20%

(2,400)

Tax Payable

9,600

Loss Summary:

Used S. 396(2)

12,000

Used S. 396B

12,000

(2,400 x 100/20)

24,000