IAASA has published a mid-year update on its financial reporting examination activities.
The primary function of IAASA’s Financial Reporting Supervision Unit (FRSU) is to examine the compliance of financial reporting of those listed companies coming within its remit with applicable accounting standards. This remit extends to the annual and half-yearly financial reports of those companies.
With the majority of companies having half-yearly reporting dates of 30 June and with FRSU’s examinations of companies’ 31 December 2016 annual financial statements underway, IAASA has issued this update to remind directors, audit committees and preparers of financial reports of some key topics to continue to consider and to provide stakeholders with an update to IAASA’s accounting enforcement activities in 2017 to date.
IAASA’s 2016 Observations document
IAASA’s 2016 Observations document focuses on some key areas that merit careful consideration in financial statements in the current reporting season including:
- Uncertainties facing entities brought on by low or negative interest rates, low commodity prices, volatility in exchange rates, Brexit and sluggish EU economic growth offset by an improving domestic economy;
- The measurement of fair values and determining discount rates used in measuring pension liabilities; and
- Reporting financial performance, including the use of alternative performance measures (APMs or KPIs) and the quality of disclosures. Disclosures should be relevant and tailored to the reporting company’s specify circumstances rather than being “boilerplate” in nature.
ESMA Common Enforcement Priorities
These topics are used by European national accounting enforcers, including IAASA, in their examinations of companies’ 2016 annual and 2017 half-yearly financial statements.
The ESMA's common enforcement topics identified are:
- Presentation of financial performance;
- Distinction between equity and liabilities; and
- Disclosure of the impact of new accounting standards in the financial statements.
ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures
ESMA published its
‘Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures’ for issuers on 30 June 2015 which have been effective in relation to any APMs disclosed on or after 3 July 2016.
The ESMA APM guidelines can be found here.
IAASA is currently engaging with a number of companies in respect to their use of APMs and is coordinating its enforcement responses with other EU accounting enforcers to ensure consistent application of the ESMA APM guidelines across Europe.
New accounting standards
International accounting standards require disclosure of the impact of an impending change in accounting policy when the company has yet to implement a new IFRS standard that has been issued but not yet come into effect.
In that context, ESMA’s
public statement dealing with issues to be considered in implementing IFRS 15
Revenue from Contracts with Customers and its
public statement dealing with issues to be considered in implementing IFRS 9
Financial Instruments have continued applicability.
IAASA is currently engaging with a number of companies in respect of the extent to which they disclose the impact of new IFRS standards in quantitative and qualitative terms.
Brexit
Risks and uncertainties consequent on Brexit remain following the outcome of the UK general election and the continued uncertainty as to how "hard" any exit agreement may be.
Topics arising from IAASA’s current year examinations
A number of financial reporting examinations of companies’ 2016 annual financial statements are underway or have already been completed. Some common themes identified from those examinations include:
- The classification of and disclosures surrounding liabilities and provisions relating to uncertain tax positions (including interest and penalties thereon) in the context of IAS 12 Income Taxes, IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, IFRIC 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments, and paragraphs 112(c), 125 and 131 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements;
- The quality of quantitative and qualitative disclosures of the impact of an impending change in accounting policy when the company has yet to implement a new IFRS standard that has been issued but not yet come into effect; and
- The extent to which companies have met the requirements of the ESMA APM guidelines. In that regard, most companies appear to have made good efforts to comply.