In September 2023 the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ) announced a review of the treatment of domestic Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) by financial services firms. The review will look at firms’ arrangements for dealing with PEPs based in the UK and will report by the end of June 2024. In the previous month of August 2023 it invited UK PEPs to share their experiences, including any problems they or their family members have encountered with the PEPs regime. The FCA has previously (in 2017 ) published guidance for how financial services firms should treat customers who are politically exposed persons when meeting their anti-money laundering obligations.

On 1 September 2023, the Institute responded to the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) invitation for comments on their proposed changes to the “UK Corporate Governance Code” (‘Code’)*.  The proposed changes arise from a UK government request of the FRC to strengthen the UK Corporate Governance Code in specific areas following the recommendations arising from UK White Paper on “Restoring Trust in Audit and Corporate Governance” (‘White Paper’) published in 2022. Some of the key changes proposed to the Principles and Provisions applying to boards include: Setting out a revised framework of prudent and effective risk management and internal controls to provide a stronger basis for reporting on, and evidencing their effectiveness. Improving the quality of comply-or-explain reporting, taking account of recently published FRC research and reports, e.g. reducing boilerplate wording and requiring reports to demonstrate the outcomes of governance activities. Revising the responsibilities of the board and audit committee for sustainability and ESG reporting, and associated assurance in accordance with a company's audit and assurance policy. Aligning governance and reporting practices with changes to legal and regulatory requirements as set out in the Government's response to the White Paper, including strengthening reporting on malus and clawback arrangements. The Institute response welcomes FRC proposals that: discourage boilerplate reporting and encourage clear and concise disclosure on the reasons for any departure from the Code’s provisions, and how the Board has otherwise adhered to the overall principles of the Code. encourage consideration of and reporting (in accordance with established sustainability reporting standards) all material sustainability and ESG matters, including climate ambitions and transition planning, in defining business purpose, strategy, and values. increase the emphasis on workforce and broader stakeholder engagement, strengthening diversity and inclusion, and improves the effectiveness of remuneration policies and transparency. respond to some of the Chartered Governance Institute recommendations on board performance reviews and emphasis on improving board effectiveness. engage with emerging risks and opportunities such as artificial intelligence, for which the Institute have provided, in our response, some detailed considerations for inclusion in FRC guidance. Some of the key points highlighted in the Institute’s response focused on: The missed opportunity from limiting the update of the Code to reacting to legislative proposals rather than addressing learnings from corporate governance in recent years, including the principles and values (including ethics and healthy culture) that were lacking in respect of high-profile corporate failures. Highlighting the increasing role and responsibilities of Audit Committees, and the risks arising by mandating them as default for additional requirements versus ensuring the ability of the Board, who are ultimately responsible, to delegate roles and responsibilities as it sees fit in accordance with fiduciary duties. The lack of guidance and definitions for key terms used in the principles and provisions which, if provided, would provide for better understanding, and promote greater consistency, in many areas of the Code, including directors declarations on risk management and internal controls, audit and assurance policies, and narrative reporting. The importance of maintaining the principle-based approach to corporate governance that the Code has championed for over thirty years and to avoid deferring to requirements which are prescriptive, a matter of law and are not suited to a comply or explain model. The risk that established and effective practices for stakeholder engagement, reporting on future prospects and delegating oversight of sustainability matters may be lost based on the way some of the proposals are set out. The Chartered Accountants Ireland response to the FRC addressed all 26 questions and is available here. The FRC proposals are available on their website here. Níall Fitzgerald, Head of Ethics and Governance, Chartered Accountants Ireland   * The Code applies to premium listed companies on the London Stock Exchange and companies with a primary listing on the Irish Stock Exchange (and the Irish Corporate Governance Annex). Other organisations can voluntarily adopt the Code, for example, Chartered Accountants Ireland applies principles of the Code where they are relevant and commensurate to the Institute as a membership body.  

The UK Financial Conduct Authority recently issued a publication on firms’ response to increased sanctions due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In the publication the FCA set out key findings from its assessments of sanctions systems and controls and includes examples of good practice and areas for improvement. While the publication is in respect of financial services firms, the findings in relation to good practices and areas that need improvement may be of interest in any efforts to making improvements to the approach to identifying and assessing the sanctions risks that firms are exposed to.

In September 2023 the EU Commission issued a guidance note for EU operators on implementing enhanced due diligence to shield against Russia sanctions circumvention. It is to help European operators to identify, assess, and understand the possible risks of Russian sanctions circumvention. It includes circumvention red flags related to business partners and customers that EU operators should watch for when they enter into a commercial relationship with a new trading partner . The EU Guidance note is in the same vein as the summary AML Alert  Russia sanctions – Trade sanctions circumvention  which was  produced by the Accountancy AML Supervisors’ Group (AASG) from an extract from the UK Department of Business and Trade notice NTE 2023/08: Russia sanctions – Trade sanctions circumvention published 22 May 2023  . Details of this notice were brought to members attention in a news item from Professional Standards Dept. of the Institute of August 23, 2023 where they alluded to awareness of the risk and obligations in relation to sanctioned goods as an important first step for those working in the accountancy profession so that they do not become party to the trade sanctions circumvention.

Technical Roundup is now published on the first and third Friday of every month – the next edition will be issued on 15 September 2023. 

The Administration (Restrictions on Disposal etc. to Connected Persons) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2021 which came into effect on 25 June 2021 imposes additional obligations on connected person purchasers in administrations. These legislative changes mean that changes need to be made to Statement of Insolvency Practice 16 - Northern Ireland (SIP 16) – pre packaged sales in administrations, and additionally the Statement of Insolvency Practice 13 - Northern Ireland (SIP 13) - disposal of assets to connected parties in an insolvency process, also need to be changed to align the content of the standards with the law. No changes have been made to the SIPs other than those required by the change in the law. The Joint Insolvency Committee has amended SIP 16 to remove references to the Pre Pack Pool and to replace them with reference to the statutory obligation placed on a connected person purchaser to obtain the opinion of an evaluator. The regulations apply to transactions that take place within 8 weeks of the appointment of an administrator. This extends the scope of the regulations beyond pre pack administrations to all administrations within that time frame. That means equivalent changes had to be made to SIP 13 as it applies to any connected party transaction in an insolvency process. The new SIPs will apply effective from 25 June 2021.