From education and the next generation, advances in technology and the evolving role of the accountant, to business and the economy, what can we expect in the New Year? As we look ahead to 2025 and the opportunities and challenges it will bring for our profession, the economy, business and wider society, our Society Chairs in Ireland and overseas give us their take on what we can expect in the 12 months ahead. Damien Carr, Chair, Chartered Accountants Ireland Leinster Society The new Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is set to have a major impact on our profession in 2025 and beyond. The CSRD is a significant regulatory framework introduced by the European Commission with the aim of enhancing transparency and accountability in sustainability reporting across the European Union (EU). This Directive was transposed into Irish law in July 2024, requiring a limited number of companies to report for periods ending on or after 31 December 2024, followed by large companies on or after 31 December 2025, and a gradual expansion to all entities meeting certain revenue thresholds by 2028. While some companies will not be required to implement the standard directly in 2025, they will nevertheless need to consider more than 1,000 data points to ensure compliance with the CSRD’s disclosure requirements. A lot of time and effort will be needed to gather this data in time to report, and I expect this to be high on the agenda for our members in 2025. The implementation of the CSRD presents both challenges and opportunities for companies in Ireland. Many of the data points incorporate information companies will not have reported on prior to its introduction. In some cases, they will need to start collecting data from scratch, both from internal sources and external sources in their value chain, such as suppliers and customers. Investment in environmental, sustainability and governance (ESG) resources will also be needed – upskilling teams, for example, new processes and controls to capture the required data points and new systems to access and present this data. All companies will need to make the effort, but smaller companies will really feel it as they will have further to go to create the necessary infrastructure. Expect to hear a lot more about the CSRD in the months ahead as ESG continues to move up the leadership agenda. Damien Carr is a Director in Audit and Assurance at Deloitte Ireland. Lynda Deane, Chair, Chartered Accountants Ireland Western Society Chartered Accountants operating in the today’s business world are no longer “just accountants.” Our role has evolved profoundly. Our focus is no longer purely on reporting, but on advising, guiding and directing. Radical developments in technology, including the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), mean we can now spend less time on repetitive, mundane and input-orientated tasks, and more on valuable strategic work and building trust with stakeholders. AI means colossal amounts of data can be transformed into useful insights at rapid speeds. It is up to us as Chartered Accountants to use these meaningful insights as a foundation to inform better business decisions – offering sound strategic advice that improves productivity, reduces costs and delivers stronger financial results. This is the era of real-time accounting and we, as a profession, must deliver on our potential to provide all stakeholders with better information, faster and more cost-effectively. The outdated perception of accountants as “number-crunchers” is no more. Today, we are valued business advisors and anchors for seamless integration with other areas of business. While some may see risk in this technology-driven shift, and its potential to disrupt career paths in accounting, I would argue that the new “input – process – output” model AI and automation enable will only ever be as good as the data we feed in at the outset, and how well we analyse and interpret the information generated. Chartered Accountants, and our profession’s in-depth financial knowledge and understanding, will play a crucial role at both ends of the process – inputting the right data, and understanding and applying the results to best effect. We may need to rethink how we train the Chartered Accountants of tomorrow, preparing them for the new reality of AI and automation, but the core building blocks and basic understanding of business operations will remain critical. It is an exciting time to be a Chartered Accountant. We, as a profession, have the capacity to drive positive and far-reaching change in the nature of the work we do in 2025 and beyond. Lynda Deane is a Director with Grant Thornton in Galway Maura Ginty, Chair, Chartered Accountants Ireland Northwest Society I think we all need to see a renewed Government focus in 2025 on strengthening Ireland’s indigenous SME and start-up sector as a counterweight to multinationals. From a tax perspective, we have valuable early-stage tax reliefs, but they are complex and often close to unworkable for start-ups without the resources to implement them. The policy objectives are fine; they are targeted – but the rules need to be simpler and less onerous. At the opposite end of the spectrum, for entrepreneurs exiting a business, I would like to see the current limits on capital gains tax reliefs lifted in recognition of the important role entrepreneurs play in Irish society. They take on risk and, in doing so, they create jobs. The regime applying to these individuals should recognise this by being more clearly distinguishable from that applying to purely passive investors. The default limit for the retirement relief exemption has not increased for close to 20 years, for example, leaving one to question whether this relief is being left to “wither on the vine.” For advisors, the good news is that two behemoths of tax complexity – interest relief and funds – are actively under review. There appears to be a desire on all sides to simplify interest relief rules, but this will take time. A review of the tax regime applying to the funds industry in Ireland is complete and recommendations have been presented to Government. The headline policy issue here is the tax regime for Irish investors, with proposals in place to align the applicable tax rates with capital gains tax and remove the controversial eight-year deemed disposal rule for Irish-domiciled funds and life products. This would represent a major change, but some development is needed as it is currently extremely difficult for casual retail investors to comply with the regime. On a more general level, I would welcome more Government consultation with tax practitioners ahead of the proposed introduction of any significant tax policy changes. Such consultations have worked well in relation to the implementation of global tax changes and, more recently, the newly introduced participation exemption for foreign dividends. Looking beyond tax, we are seeing a lot of change and consolidation in the accounting sector, with M&A activity among practices nationwide continuing at pace. I believe there will always be a niche role for independent practices, however – in this market, specialism is key. On the talent front, attracting and retaining staff remains critical for firms across the board – and the much-vaunted culture of long hours is definitely coming to an end. Younger entrants are placing greater value on work-life balance and their time and life outside work, and this is a positive development. There will always be those drawn to long hours and the “daily grind,” but this should never be a baseline expectation for talented and capable individuals who want to succeed in our profession. Maura Ginty is the founder of tax advisory firm Gintax. Profession poised to take centre-stage on critical issues in Australia As we wrap up another year and look to the months ahead, Chartered Accountants are primed to take centre-stage on the “big issues” in business, practice and the wider economy, writes Cliff Wilson, Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland Australian Society. In 2025, I expect to see greater demand for Chartered Accountants to take the lead, as governments and businesses grapple with economic, regulatory and societal challenges, such as inflation and climate change. In particular, environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting is becoming incredibly important because it helps businesses be more transparent and accountable. The rules and regulations underpinning ESG are undergoing constant change, however, so it is crucial for Chartered Accountants to keep up. We need to ensure we are up-to-date at all times and learning continuously about new regulations to ensure compliance. Looking beyond sustainability, we are really starting to see just how powerful advanced technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning can be in allowing Chartered Accountants to focus more on the “big picture” strategic stuff. Investing in this technology can effectively automate boring tasks and make financial reporting and analysis super-efficient and accurate – but it also means we need to change how we work and think. As AI and automation become ever-more prevalent, we will need strong leaders willing to let go of the “busywork” and make time to allow us to learn the new skills of the future. As businesses face greater complexity and competition, demand for the advisory and consulting services offered by Chartered Accountants is skyrocketing. To paraphrase Warren Buffett, “Accounting is the language of business,” and this is perhaps truer today than ever before. More and more businesses need our expertise in financial planning, risk management and strategic decision-making and – in response – we need to prioritise our analytical and communication skills to stay ahead of the game. The accounting profession is evolving rapidly, and this means continuous learning is essential. We need to know about new technologies, regulations and best practice to maintain efficiency, accuracy and strategic insight at all times. It is an exciting time to be a Chartered Accountant, with plenty of opportunities to make a real impact. Embrace change and invest in continuous learning, and you will thrive in 2025 and beyond. Cliff Wilson is Director of Wilson Select. Joseph Grant, Chair, ACA Professionals 2025 is shaping up to be an important year for the future of the accountancy profession with significant change on the way, shaped by new regulations, advancing technology and the evolving expectations of the workforce. From the CSRD to the increasing prevalence of AI and shifting workforce dynamics, Chartered Accountants in both business and practice will need to navigate fast-emerging trends. One major area of development will undoubtedly be the CSRD. As business leaders, accountants will play a central role in ensuring our employers and clients meet their sustainability reporting obligations. This may prove challenging as we learn to shift our mindset to integrate sustainability metrics with traditional financial reporting. As CSRD requirements take effect, I expect many of us will be more exposed to this work in 2025 as a larger number of organisations prepare to begin mandatory reporting in 2026. This Directive also provides an opportunity for Chartered Accountants to lead the charge in sustainable business as well as demonstrating our versatility as a profession. AI as a technology promises greater efficiency and a sea change in how important data for decision-making is gathered and processed. For Chartered Accountants, AI promises to cut down the time we spend on repetitive routine tasks, freeing us up to concentrate on more valuable complex and strategic work. While this is welcomed by many, my own prediction is that the AI shift will also bring greater focus on intellectual property rights and cybersecurity risks, particularly concerning the datasets used by AI systems. As AI becomes more widely used, I think businesses will need to pay more attention to the security of the data they are feeding into these models, the reliability of the outputs and the need to establish clear and comprehensive internal workplace policies to mitigate risk and misuse. On the workforce front, I believe we will continue to see greater mobility among younger Chartered Accountants willing and eager to move abroad to seek global opportunities. Even as some employers are pushing for a return to an office-first working model, I think younger professionals will also continue to prioritise work-life balance over the need for a prescribed presence in traditional office environments. The majority of employers will support this, but I would also hope to see greater Government investment in the infrastructure needed to facilitate successful remote and hybrid working, both in terms of the digital infrastructure and commuter links that would facilitate the decentralisation of Ireland’s workforce in locations outside our major cities. Joseph Grant is Financial Accountant External Reporting and Compliance, Primark. Rachel McCann, Chair, Chartered Accountants Ireland Cork Society As we approach 2025, Chartered Accountants working in business are at the centre of transformation driven by technological advancements, regulatory developments and evolving business dynamics. Our role is fast evolving beyond traditional bookkeeping and financial reporting towards more strategic functions. In particular, I see four key priority areas for today’s Chartered Accountant. AI and data analytics In 2025, we can expect the widespread adoption of AI-powered tools that can handle routine tasks, such as data entry, reconciliations and even complex financial forecasting. This shift will allow accountants to move away from time-consuming transactional duties and focus on more value-added services, such as strategic advising, decision support and risk management. AI will also assist in fraud detection, using predictive analytics to identify irregularities humans might overlook. This proactive approach will not only streamline internal controls, but also reduce errors, facilitating more accurate financial reporting. Data analytics now gives Chartered Accountants access to real-time data that is easy to interpret. In 2025, we will likely begin to work more closely with data scientists, IT teams and business analysts to leverage machine learning and AI for predictive analytics, customer insights and trend forecasting. Accountants will also play a central role in ensuring data quality and governance, as businesses generate more data than ever before. ESG reporting Chartered Accountants will be expected to ensure the accuracy and transparency of ESG reports, as well as advising on strategies for meeting sustainability goals. This shift reflects the growing demand for businesses to demonstrate responsible practices, which is becoming a critical consideration for investors, consumers and regulators alike. Businesses now need to begin putting the necessary plans in place to ensure they are fully prepared when their time comes to report. Digital tax and e-invoicing Although delayed in several countries, e-invoicing will soon apply across Europe. Now is the time for businesses to prepare by ensuring they are registered on jurisdictional portals, have digital signatures and the right software ready for their business needs. The global shift toward digital tax compliance will require accountants to navigate complex tax rules, including VAT/GST requirements for digital services, transfer pricing and cross-border tax compliance. Leadership skills While much of the focus on change and transformation in our profession continues to centre on technology, we can never forget the critical importance of the “human element.” Technology can, and does, fail and we then need to be able to rely on client relationships to overcome any issues or challenges that may arise as we introduce, and adapt to, new technologies. Being able to pick up the phone to a client will always be a key requirement for Chartered Accountants. Making time to organise a coffee, lunch or social outing with clients will always be at the core of developing solid business relationships and generating opportunities. We, as leaders, need to ensure that the next generation of our profession has the communication skills needed to forge and maintain strong relationships as they look to progress and develop in their own careers. Rachel McCann is a Director with Grant Thornton in Cork. The view from Northern Ireland Northern Ireland’s unique position as a bridge between Britain and the EU opens up exciting pathways for growth in key sectors in the year ahead, writes Gillian Sadlier, Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society. As Ulster Society members have identified in our surveys, this unique position presents a great deal of opportunity, both for our region and profession, across sectors including clean energy, health sciences, cyber security and data analytics. Through challenging times – from Brexit to the pandemic, and the ups and downs of local politics – Chartered Accountants have been crucial, helping businesses navigate uncertainty and plan for the future. Demand for Chartered Accountants in Northern Ireland is stronger than ever, fuelled not just by our financial know-how, but by the broader strategic insight we offer. Our members hold many critical roles and their advice shapes major decisions, helping businesses grow and, ultimately, boosting the local economy. All of this places great emphasis on the need to continue developing our skills to respond to the needs of the world around us, as well as the need to continue attracting fresh talent to the profession. Today’s Chartered Accountant needs to be adept at communicating, leading teams and understanding complex regulatory issues. Northern Ireland’s access to both the UK and EU markets also opens up niche opportunities in cross-border trade, data compliance and risk management. Chartered Accountants who dive into these areas will not only enhance their careers but will also bring huge value to local businesses and organisations seeking to expand. With skills shortages a real issue, there is also a great opportunity to showcase just how dynamic a career as a Chartered Accountant can be. Young professionals need to see that this is a field filled with possibilities – you can expect to make an impact, influence strategy and work across many industries. For those of us already in the profession, investing in personal development and leadership skills will ensure we can seize the many opportunities ahead and play an even bigger role in Northern Ireland’s future. Chartered Accountants are vital to Northern Ireland’s economic story. By helping businesses thrive, advocating for good governance and guiding strategic decisions, we are building the foundations of a resilient economy. With the right focus on skill-building, recruitment and showcasing the real value of the profession, Chartered Accountants in Northern Ireland can continue to lead the way in 2025 and beyond, making a positive, genuine and tangible difference to the prosperity of our region. Gillian Sadlier is a Senior Manager with Bank of Ireland UK. Shane O’Neill, Chair, Chartered Accountants Ireland Midwest Society The role of the Chartered Accountant has undergone significant transformation in recent years, influenced in no small part by advances in technology – in particular, AI and automation. Traditionally, Chartered Accountants were tasked with manual bookkeeping and journal entry, financial reporting and compliance auditing. With the rise of digital tools and intelligent software, however, many routine functions have now been automated, shifting the focus of our work to more strategic and analytical responsibilities. In the year ahead and beyond, we can expect this trend to deepen as AI and machine learning continue to redefine, not only the accounting landscape but also how people in many professions perform their roles. These technologies are already adept at performing tasks such as data entry, invoice processing and even complex financial forecasting. Automation will allow accountants to focus less on routine data processing and more on interpreting financial data to provide valuable insights for decision-making. In this evolving environment, Chartered Accountants will become advisors, translating complex data into actionable strategies for business. Our focus will be on adding value, rather than solely ensuring regulatory compliance. AI will also enhance our ability to detect and prevent fraud. Machine learning algorithms can analyse patterns and detect anomalies far more efficiently than manual processes. Many accounting firms and finance departments have already begun to integrate such AI-powered tools to safeguard against financial discrepancies and fraud, making the risk management and compliance element of the Chartered Accountant’s role more robust. I expect this trend to continue in 2025 and beyond, requiring Chartered Accountants to develop a solid understanding of how these AI models work so we can audit and validate our results effectively. Data analytics and visualisation tools are also changing how financial data is communicated. The Chartered Accountant of the future will need to be proficient in data analytics so that we can generate deeper insights and present these findings in a way that stakeholders can easily understand. This shift will require a new skillset, pushing our profession to develop a stronger grasp of technology, analytics and digital communication. While AI and automation may streamline many accounting functions, the demand for ethical judgment, strategic insight and adaptability will remain solely the preserve of the human workforce. In 2025 and beyond, the Chartered Accountant will be seen as a strategic partner in business planning, combining technological fluency with core accounting principles to drive growth and innovation. Embracing this shift, while upholding our traditional values of accuracy, integrity and professionalism, will define the Chartered Accountant’s role in the rapidly evolving business world – and continuous learning and adaptability will be crucial. Shane O’Neill is Financial Reporting Manager at H&MV Engineering. UK businesses sound positive note for the economy in 2025 The last 12 months have been eventful, featuring the UK general election in July and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the Middle East, writes Greg McAnenly, Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland London Society. In October, the UK endured a much-anticipated post-election budget – one which sought to solve deficits in public services, but arguably lacked incentives to drive growth and investment in business. That said, there was some relief that capital gains and income tax hikes struck a softer note than had been predicted in some quarters. The ongoing sluggishness in the general economy, coupled with geopolitical uncertainty, compounded the market challenges facing UK businesses in 2024. Striking a more positive note as we look towards 2025, businesses are broadly optimistic that the economy is entering a more stabilised phase and, especially in the so-called “London bubble,” there is a sense that the UK economy may be entering a phase of sustained economic growth. Supported by inflation dropping back to the much-targeted two percent level and interest rates finally falling, the City is looking to overseas and domestic investors to deploy capital and trigger a more buoyant market – so far, the signals are promising. As Chartered Accountants, we are all well-versed in the need to keep up with ever-evolving regulatory requirements. However, as the UK begins to move on from the economic fall-out of Brexit, it will be interesting to see whether the government seeks to carve out paths to the de-regulation promised pre- and post-election in areas such as the finance, housing and energy. Developments in this space will almost certainly require the involvement of Chartered Accountants to ensure change is both measured and appropriate. As with Ireland, the profession in the UK is experiencing challenges attracting new talent and maintaining the important role and relevance of the work we do. As much as this is a potential threat, it also presents opportunity. Right now, the opportunities for our profession to evolve, through upskilling and investment in new technologies such as Artificial Technology (AI), are endless. Already, we are seeing AI automation delivering valuable efficiencies in both professional services and industry – through solutions for preparing statutory accounts, tax computations and smart research tools, for example. Continued investment in this area is not only necessary, but also unlocks opportunities for skilled Chartered Accountants to become more strategically effective and create exciting new roles aligning technology with the valuable skillset of the Chartered Accountant. Showcasing our profession’s dynamic competencies is a valuable tool we can, and should, use to attract younger candidates to a profession with a bright future. Greg McAnenly is a Senior Tax Manager with Related Argent.

Revenue has updated the Tax and Duty Manual regarding the deduction for Digital Services Tax (DST) to include the Canadian DST in the list of DSTs which are accepted as being deductible where incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of a trade. 

The European Commission has welcomed the Court of Auditors' special report on the EU's efforts to combat harmful tax regimes and corporate tax avoidance. The report acknowledges the progress made by the Commission and Member States in implementing the EU's framework to tackle these issues. The Court of Auditors' report highlights the key measures introduced by the EU, such as the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, the Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the field of taxation, and the Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Directive. The report notes that these measures have contributed to a more transparent and fair tax environment in the EU.

In this week’s post EU exit corner, we bring you the latest guidance updates and publications relevant in the post EU exit environment. The most recent Trader Support Service bulletin is also available as is the latest Brexit and Beyond newsletter from the Northern Ireland Assembly EU Affairs team. And finally, we remind you that from 1 January 2025, the Windsor Framework (WF) introduces new rules in the UK for product licensing and labelling. WF changes from 1 January 2025 From 1 January 2025, the WF introduces new rules in the UK for product licensing, labelling, and the EU Falsified Medicines Directive (FMD). This is designed to ensure that medicines can be approved and licensed on a UK-wide basis by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and medicines can be supplied in the same packs across the UK. It also provides for the disapplication of FMD safety features for medicines marketed and supplied in Northern Ireland. Further information is available in the guidance here on the MHRA Windsor Framework Hub. Miscellaneous guidance updates and publications Locations you need to submit an ‘arrived’ export declaration before moving goods, Importing certain agricultural goods and food from outside the UK, How to use your duty deferment account, Check how to get your import VAT certificate (C79), Submit a pleasure craft report, Designated export place (DEP) codes for Data Element 5/23 of the Customs Declaration Service, Data Element 2/3: Documents and Other Reference Codes (Union) of the Customs Declaration Service, and External temporary storage facilities codes for Data Element 5/23 of the Customs Declaration Service.  

In this week’s miscellaneous updates, HMRC has published a range of new guidelines for compliance (GFCs) and further updated guidance on Pillar Two has been published. The National Audit Office has published its annual report on HMRC and regulations on the penalties applicable to late payment of tax have been laid. And finally, the latest fuel advisory rates, which apply to employees using a company car, have been published and should be used from 1 December 2024. New GFCs The following new GFCs have been recently published: pay as you earn settlement agreement calculations, the apprenticeship levy and the national insurance employment allowance, patent box computations, and the economic crime levy. According to HMRC, GFCs “explain HMRC’s view on complex, widely misunderstood or novel risks that can occur across tax regimes” and are published to help taxpayers “avoid non-compliance”. The full range of GFCs published to date is available on GOV.UK. Pillar Two updated guidance HMRC has published further Pillar Two guidance which sets out: how and when to pay domestic top-up tax and multinational top-up tax, and how to use HMRC's online services for replacing the filing member on a Pillar 2 top-up taxes account. This confirms that the 15-character reference provided at registration must be used when making payments which should be made no later than: 30 June 2026 (if the first accounting period the group is required to report top up taxes ends on or before 31 December 2024), 18 months after the last day of the group’s accounting period (if the first accounting period the group is required to report top-up taxes ends after 31 December 2024), and the later of 30 June 2026 and 15 months after the last day of the group’s accounting period for all other periods. National Audit Office (NAO) HMRC report The NAO has published its annual report on HMRC. The report summarises the key relevant information and insights that can be gained from its examinations of HMRC and HMRC’s annual report and accounts and is intended to support the Treasury Committee, committees working with the Department for Business and Trade and the Department for Work and Pensions, and MPs in their examination of HMRC. The report includes: the role and remit of the department, how the department is structured, where the department spends its money, key spending commitments and major programmes/developments, the department’s key areas of work, and key challenges facing the department this Parliament. This report updates the NAO’s previous report published in 2019. Regulations for late payment of tax penalties The Penalties for Failure to Pay Tax (Schedule 26 to the Finance Act 2021) (Assessments) Regulations 2024 were published last month and entered into force on 4 December 2024. These regulations are aimed at taxpayers who “intentionally avoid a second Late Payment Penalty by not paying their tax before the end of the two-year time limit”.   The regulations allow HMRC to assess and charge the second late payment penalty where the outstanding tax has not been paid in full, towards the end of the two-year time limit.

Due to the decrease in the Bank of England base rate at the beginning of November, HMRC subsequently announced the associated decreases in its interest rates. The new rates took effect from Monday 18 November 2024 for quarterly instalment payments, and 26 November 2024 for non-quarterly instalments payments. The two new decreased rates of interest are as follows:- late payment interest, set at base rate plus 2.5 percent, is now 7.25 percent; and repayment interest, set at base rate minus 1 percent, with a lower limit of 0.5 percent (known as the minimum floor), is now 3.75 percent.

Last week the Scottish Finance Secretary, Shona Robison, delivered the draft Scottish Budget 2025/26. Chapter 2 of this Budget publication sets out the Scottish Government’s tax policy and strategy. Scotland’s Tax Strategy: Building on our Tax Principles was also published last week. The key tax devolved to Scotland is income tax. The draft Budget announced that for 2025/26, the starter rate band will increase by 22.6 percent and the basic rate band will increase by 6.6 percent meaning that the thresholds for paying both the basic and intermediate rates of tax will increase by 3.5 percent, both of which are above inflation. The higher, advanced, and top rate thresholds will be frozen to the end of the current parliamentary term in Spring 2026. Our fellow Professional Body ICAS has been looking at these measures in more detail. The Scottish Fiscal Commission has also published its report Scotland’s Economic and Fiscal Forecasts – December 2024 along with a one page graphic of key figures and a summary document. Background information is also available including spreadsheets with data for tables and charts. The following documents were also published: Scottish tax ready reckoners, Scottish Income Tax 2025/2026: factsheet, Scottish Budget 2025/26: pre-budget engagement summary, and Climate Xchange: International evidence on fiscal levers to deliver reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

The Irish Corporate Governance Code represents a progressive approach to ensuring best practice among companies listed on Euronext Dublin and enhances the reputation of ‘Ireland Inc’ globally. Níall Fitzgerald and Louise Gorman explain why Did you know that Ireland hosts one of the most extensive corporate governance infrastructures in Europe?  In Ireland, there are specific governance codes applicable to listed companies, charities, state bodies, financial services institutions, funds and sports organisations.  This is in addition to other entity-specific requirements that may also apply – charities may have to comply with multiple governance requirements as a condition of receiving state funding, for example.  Yet, until recently, Irish listed companies have relied on the best practice principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code (UK Code).  It is therefore worth considering the extent to which the recent publication of the Irish Corporate Governance Code 2024 (Irish Code) presents a new opportunity to tailor best practice in corporate governance to Irish listed companies. The Irish Code will apply initially to a small number of companies listed on Euronext Dublin, the Irish Stock Exchange, for financial years commencing 1 January 2025. Those dual-listed in both Ireland and the UK have the option to either follow the Irish Code or the UK Code in respect of their Irish listing.  The introduction of the Irish Corporate Governance Code is nonetheless significant.  Four years on from the UK’s departure from the European Union (EU), the Irish Code signals that the time has come for Irish companies to follow a path aligned with EU policy and practice, while remaining loyal to the overarching best practice principles established by the UK. It also reflects welcome proactivity in protecting and enhancing the reputation of ‘Ireland Inc’ on the global stage.  Historically, many corporate governance codes and laws internationally have been introduced in response to corporate failings.  By contrast, the Irish Code has emerged out of a desire to ensure that best practice is suitably tailored to the specific circumstances of Irish listed companies.  This comes at no cost to our competitiveness. We retain our well-established ‘comply or explain’ principles-based approach, while also remaining globally connected via our EU membership. Further, we host a US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board presence relating to both Irish companies listed on US Stock Exchanges and US listed companies operating in Ireland. What does this mean for Irish companies? Irish companies already complying with the UK Code will, for the most part, maintain their existing governance practices. They will need to address some specific Irish Code requirements, however. The extent of any differences here will vary depending on each company’s governance policies and structures.  Some companies may find the adjustment process less challenging, particularly those already preparing for the new UK Code applying from 1 January 2025 (apart from Provision 29, which applies from 1 January 2026).  The UK Code served as the basis for developing the Irish Code. Euronext Dublin has made changes only where necessary to ensure proportionality and relevance.  To enhance the principle-based approach, Euronext Dublin has also taken the decision not to include some of the more prescriptive requirements driven largely by the UK regulatory environment.  Maintaining close alignment makes sense as the UK Code is highly regarded and sets a high standard for corporate governance that is emulated internationally.  Our table illustrates some of the key differences between the Irish and the UK Code. Some of these differences, and what they mean for Irish companies, are further explained below. Internal control and risk management: A significant new requirement in the UK Code is included within Provision 29. This requires boards to provide a “declaration of effectiveness” on internal controls, identifying any ineffective controls as of the balance sheet date. Compliance will require boards to establish an independent framework to monitor and assess their internal control and risk management systems. The Irish Code also requires boards to review and report on the effectiveness of these systems, but it is less detailed, not requiring specific declarations or publication of ineffective controls at the balance sheet date. Audit committees: The UK Code requires audit committees to adhere to the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) “Audit Committees and the External Audit: Minimum Standard.” In contrast, the Irish Code outlines the roles and responsibilities of audit committees, which are consistent with Companies Act 2014 (Section 167) requirements, without reference to an additional standard, specifying that their work should be detailed in the annual report. Maintaining the principle-based approach in this area is practical, as best practices for audit committees are evolving in accordance with emerging recommendations on audit tendering oversight and sustainability reporting coming from bodies such as the FRC and Accountancy Europe. Less prescriptive and more proportionate: The Irish Code retains core principles, such as workforce engagement, but leaves it to boards to choose the most appropriate methods for their companies’ needs. This facilitates greater flexibility relative to equivalent parts of the UK Code which specify detailed considerations or criteria. The Irish Code aligns some provisions with those in smaller EU capital markets, enabling a proportionate governance approach. For example, while one of the criteria for assessing non-executive directors’ independence in the UK Code requires a five-year employee cooling-off period to be considered, the Irish Code sets this at three years, balancing market size and available talent. Regulatory oversight and enforcement: Like the UK, the Irish Code relies on the market mechanism. It aims to promote high standards of integrity, transparency and accountability. Investors and stakeholders can evaluate disclosures and make comparisons across companies in assessing corporate governance quality. These assessments then inform decisions and actions taken in the markets, such as the decision to buy or sell shares. The implication of this in the UK experience is that the FRC has no sanctioning authority in instances of weak compliance; sanctioning is left to the market mechanism. The FRC does, however, conduct thematic reviews to guide improvements in corporate reporting and governance. Ireland currently has no equivalent body for corporate governance assessment. However, the Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority reviews annual reports for EU Transparency Directive compliance, without a specific corporate governance focus. While sanctions do not apply for weak governance compliance, Euronext Dublin can impose sanctions or suspend listings for violations of the listing rules. The Financial Conduct Authority in the UK has a similar approach.   The Irish Code and the UK Code: key differences Workforce engagement  The Irish Code requires boards to explain workforce engagement methods and their effectiveness, without mandating a specific method as in the UK Code. Additionally, it requires a board review of policies for raising concerns. This requirement aligns with the OECD Corporate Governance Principles 2023.  Threshold for addressing shareholder dissent The threshold for consulting with shareholders on a dissenting vote against a board recommendation is set at 25 percent under the Irish Code (20% in the UK Code). Unlike the UK, there is no requirement to provide a six-month shareholder update on the consultation, but it should be addressed in the next annual report. Non-executive director independence  When considering the independence of a non-executive director (NED), the criteria relating to previous employment by the company is whether they have been an employee of the company within the last three years (compared to five years in the UK Code). Board appointments The Irish Code does not include the UK Code restriction on the number of appointments a non-executive director has in a FTSE 100 or other significant undertaking. The Irish Code requires all commitments to be considered when determining whether the NED has the capacity to fully commit to the board. Company Secretary The Irish Code further elaborates on the role of the Company Secretary in ensuring a good information flow within the board, its committees and between management and non-executive directors – recording accurate minutes, facilitating induction and assisting with professional development of non-executive directors. Board evaluation The Irish Code replaces the UK Code reference to FTSE 350 companies with “companies with a market capitalisation in excess of €750 million” in the requirement to conduct an external board evaluation at least once every three years. Board skills and expertise The Irish Code includes an additional requirement for the nomination committee to use the results of a board evaluation to identify the board’s skills, knowledge and expertise requirements. This should be reflected in board succession plans, professional development plans and steps taken to ensure the board has access to the skills, knowledge and expertise it requires. This requirement is consistent with good governance practices in other EU countries, e.g. the 2020 Belgium Code on Corporate Governance. Diversity and inclusion Whereas the UK Code includes reference to UK equality legislation for diversity characteristics, the Irish Code requires companies to have a diversity and inclusion policy regarding gender and other aspects of diversity of relevance to the company and includes measurable objectives for implementing such a policy. The Irish Code requires this policy to be reviewed annually. Audit Committee To ensure consistency with the Companies Act 2014, the requirement for one member of the Audit Committee to have “recent and relevant financial experience” is changed to “competence in accounting or auditing”. Reference to “financial reporting process” is replaced with “corporate reporting process” to better reflect the audit committee’s role in monitoring financial and non-financial reporting, e.g. sustainability reporting. Reference to the UK specific Financial Reporting Council guidance on “Audit Committees and the External Audit: Minimum Standard” is also removed. Internal controls and risk management systems The Irish Code does not include the UK Code provision for the board to include a declaration of effectiveness of material controls, but the requirement to monitor the company’s internal control and risk management systems and review their effectiveness remains.  Remuneration Under the Irish Code, share awards in long-term incentive plans must vest over at least three years, unlike the UK’s five-year minimum. Malus and clawback provisions should be described generally in annual reports, and executive pensions require thoughtful comparison to workforce pensions, with less prescriptive rules than the UK Code. What next for the Irish Code?  Euronext Dublin is in the process of revising the Listing Rules to give effect to the new Irish Code and is further streamlining the requirements.  An Irish Corporate Governance Panel will be established, with responsibility for reviewing and advising on changes to the Irish Code in the context of the evolving corporate governance landscape in Ireland, the UK and Europe alongside other factors.  What impact the Irish Code will have remains to be seen. It represents a sensible approach to building on the reputation and quality of the UK Code, and while there are some differences between the Irish and UK Code, they are mostly aligned.  We have been careful to note that the Irish Code initially applies only to a small number of companies, so one may be forgiven for questioning its true significance. Nonetheless, key issues on the European regulatory horizon suggest that it may mark the start of a greater departure from the UK’s approach to governance.  The recent transposition of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive into Irish law provides another example of this as the CSRD’s required disclosures on governance introduce an EU influence into governance in Irish companies.  Future revisions to the Irish Code may further reflect this newly established autonomy in governance in Ireland, particularly as we adopt the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and other directives the European Commission will inevitably introduce over time.  Currently, best practice principles for Irish private companies are limited to voluntarily following the UK’s Wates Corporate Governance Principles for Large Private Companies. Just as the UK Code has influenced these principles, the Irish Code may provide a basis for further extension to large private entities.  There is also a strong argument that any evolution in corporate governance guidance deserves due consideration, particularly as boards deal with increasing risks and opportunities from environmental, social, economic and technological developments.  As it happens, there are no immediate plans to draft guidance to support the Irish Code, and the FRC’s Corporate Governance Code Guidance should, in the short term, be sufficient to fill the gap.  Experts in the area have long noted that attention tends be paid to corporate governance only when a failure occurs.  Given the level of public scrutiny such failures attract, and the associated reputational costs borne by board members, any Irish listed company director should be asking themselves if they can really afford not to pay attention to the new Irish Corporate Governance Code. Níall Fitzgerald, FCA, is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland Louise Gorman is Assistant Professor at Trinity Business School

Earlier today HMRC advised us that some of its telephone helplines are currently experiencing a reduced level of service due to a technical issue. HMRC first made us aware of this late last week. HMRC is working urgently to resolve this. Taxpayers and agents can continue to use online services, where relevant, which we have been advised are working as normal.

COP29 concluded in late November with uneasy agreement on the controversial Baku Finance Goal pledging $300 billion in climate funding to developing countries, writes Susan Rossney COP29, the global climate summit, concluded in the early hours of 24 November in Baku, Azerbaijan. There were some positive developments, such as the deal reached on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement to finally allow countries to trade carbon credits with each other. Most significantly, though, for this ‘climate COP’, was the final agreement called the Baku Finance Goal. In 2009, at COP15 in Copenhagen, parties agreed a collective goal for developed nations to provide $100 billion annually in climate financing to developing countries. The new goal agreed at COP29 ups the annual financial target to $300 billion, to be funded from public sources, with provision for the shortfall to be made up of funding from private sources. To say opinion was divided on this new goal is an understatement. While some parties are cautiously optimistic that the agreement would at least keep the core principles of the Paris Agreement alive, many more were outraged by how much the new goal falls short of what is actually needed. It is generally agreed that $1 trillion per year by 2030 (rising to $1.3tn per year by 2035) is needed to help developing countries build resilience, prepare for disasters and cut emissions of planet-warming greenhouse gases. While this figure is enormous, it’s worth noting for context that $2.4 trillion was spent on weapons in 2023, and at least $1 trillion was spent in 2022 on subsidies to keep fossil fuel prices artificially low. Also worth noting is that the provision of financial support to developing countries for climate action serves both a moral and economic purpose for wealthier countries. The chaos caused by the climate and biodiversity crises to societies and economies is not limited to developing countries alone. This was demonstrated most recently by the 224 lives lost in Spain as a result of flooding linked to rising temperatures in the Mediterranean Sea. On 28 November, Spain’s government approved a new “paid climate leave” entitlement of up to four days to allow workers take time off if unable to travel to their place of work in the event of official warnings of extreme weather conditions. The Institute for Economics and Peace further predicts that one billion people face being displaced within 30 years due to the climate crisis, with huge impacts for both the developed and developing worlds. COP30 will take place in Belém, Brazil in 2025. Its focus will centre on efforts by each country to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change (the so-called ‘NDCs’ or ‘nationally determined contributions’). It remains to be seen if COP30 will achieve what G20 leaders have said it should – i.e. to be “our last chance to avoid an irreversible rupture in the climate system”. Susan Rossney is Sustainability Advocacy Manager at Chartered Accountants Ireland. Check out Chartered Accountants Ireland’s sustainability centre for signposts to a variety of resources available to businesses. Also, subscribe to the Institute’s fortnightly Technical Round Up and weekly Sustainability/ESG Bulletins, both in the weekly Chartered Accountants Ireland newsletter, and on LinkedIn.

Comments from Chartered Accountants Ireland were included in a recent Sunday Independent article on the operation of benefit-in-kind on staff benefits. The Institute’s Head of Tax, Gearóid O’Sullivan was recently featured in the Sunday Independent answering readers’ questions on the rent tax credit and dividing land that is jointly owned.

Revenue has published the following new VAT manuals:  VAT notes for guidance following Finance Act 2024, and VAT treatment of share transactions and trading platforms. In addition, the following manuals have also been updated:  VAT Treatment of Factoring and Invoice Discounting, VAT and Solicitors includes a new paragraph (4) on legal fees relating to lenders, and VAT treatment of stock exchange fees has been updated to provide guidance on the current regime.

Section 125A SDCA 1999 provides for a stamp duty to be levied on certain health insurance contracts entered into between health insurers and their customers. Revenue has updated the Stamp Duty Manual which provides guidance on the levy on authorised insurers. The updated manual now includes the rates of the levy for accounting periods commencing on or after 1 April 2025, as provided for by section 10 of the Health Insurance (Amendment) and Health (Provision of Menopause Products) Act 2024, which was enacted on 11 November 2024.  The following stamp duty manuals have also been updated to reflect amendments to Part 9 SDCA 1999 contained in Finance Act 2024:  Part 9: Levies Part 9 - Section 126AB - Further levy on certain financial institutions

Revenue has published a new Tax and Duty Manual which provides guidance on obtaining a corporation tax deduction for stock exchange listing expenditure. With effect from 1 January 2025, new section 81D TCA 1997 provides corporation tax relief for expenditure of up to €1 million incurred by a company on listing its shares for the first time on an EEA stock exchange. According to the manual, the admission to trading of the company’s shares must take place on or after 1 January 2025 and on or before 31 December 2029.   

Revenue has updated the Tax and Duty Manual which provides guidance on pre-letting expenditure in respect of vacant residential premises. The updated manual now reflects the extension to 31 December 2027 for the deduction of expenses incurred on a vacant residential property against rental income from those premises under section 97A(2) TCA 1997.  

The Central Statistics Office (CSO) has published the Quarterly National Accounts for the third quarter of 2024. Modified Domestic Demand increased by 1.3 percent relative to the previous quarter and was up 4.1 percent on an annual basis. Gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 3.5 percent in Q3 2024 and increased by 2.9 percent on an annual basis.  Commenting on the figures, the Minister for Finance, Jack Chambers TD, said: “I am pleased to see continued strength in the domestic economy in the third quarter of 2024. Modified Domestic Demand – my preferred metric of Ireland’s economic performance – grew by 1.3 per cent on a quarterly basis and recorded strong annual growth of over 4 per cent. Importantly, growth on an annual basis has been broad based in nature with both consumer spending (1.7 per cent) and modified investment (10.4 per cent) making a positive contribution. This solid growth is consistent with the strength of our labour market and the robust exchequer figures released yesterday. Taken together these metrics all demonstrate that the economy has performed strongly this year. While today’s figures are encouraging they are, of course, backward looking. Indeed, the economic outlook has become increasingly uncertain and risks are now clearly titled to the downside with the most pressing risks external in nature. As a small, open and highly globalised economy, Ireland is particularly vulnerable to any deterioration in the external environment.  Put simply, these are risks that we cannot control directly – we must instead focus on managing what is in our control. In particular, we must continue to build up our fiscal buffers, invest in our people and our infrastructure, and ensure the economy remains competitive. This will help ensure that we are in the best position possible to address future challenges.” 

With November being the most important month of the year for tax receipts, the Minister for Finance noted that the recent November Exchequer figures indicate that tax revenues continue to perform well. November is the month in which the largest payments are made for corporation tax, as well as the last VAT-due month of the year. Total tax receipts for November amounted to €22.8 billion, €7.2 billion (or 46.1 percent) higher than November 2023.   November is also the deadline for self-assessed income tax. Income tax receipts in November were €4.7 billion, only €60 million (or 1.3 percent) ahead of November last year. However, this relatively weak performance year-on-year was offset by continued growth in PAYE receipts. Overall, income tax receipts were €1.9 billion, or 6.4 percent, ahead of November 2023.   Corporation tax receipts in November amounted to €13.7 billion, which is €7.4 billion (or 116.8 percent) higher than November last year. The bulk of the increase is due to receipts arising from the Apple tax case ruling in September. On a cumulative basis, corporation tax receipts of €35.0 billion are now ahead of last year by €13.0 billion (or 59.1 percent).  VAT receipts to end-November are €3.1 billion, 1.3 billion (or 6.4 percent) up on the same period last year. The Exchequer surplus stood at €13.8 billion, to end-November, an increase of €8.4 billion in comparison with the same period last year, reflecting the Apple tax case revenues received in November. Commenting on the figures, the Minister for Finance, Jack Chambers TD, said:  “The Exchequer returns to end-November show most tax heads have demonstrated steady growth across the year. The growth in income tax and VAT receipts demonstrates the strength of our economy and labour market, but our public finances remain exposed to highly volatile corporation tax receipts. This revenue stream is also skewed by the receipt of around two-thirds of the revenue arising from the CJEU ruling of September 10th.”   

Amendments to FRS 102: are you ready for change? Aimed at improving financial reporting practices, the latest FRS 102 amendments introduce important changes finance teams must begin preparing for today. Emer Fitzpatrick and Cayetano Bautista III delve into the details. FRS 102 is the predominant accounting standard used by small and medium businesses (SMEs) and private family businesses across the island of Ireland. It was introduced in 2013, applying to accounting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2015, with early adoption permitted. The UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is the standard setter for FRS 102 and performs periodic reviews of the accounting standard, at least every five years. The aim of these reviews is to take account of changes in global accounting standards – such as changes to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) accounting standards, and to respond to specific issues as they arise, such as regulatory decisions and stakeholder feedback. Amendments are then developed and proposed after feedback has been sought from the relevant stakeholders. The first periodic review of FRS 102 was completed in December 2017, coming into effect on 1 January 2019, and the FRC recently completed another periodic review in March 2024. This most recent review has taken several years to complete due to the need for extensive consultations with stakeholders. The effective date of the amendments arising from this review will be applicable for accounting periods on or after 1 January 2026. (Earlier effective dates apply to new disclosures about supplier finance arrangements, starting from 1 January 2025, with early application permitted). Early application is, however, permitted where all amendments are applied simultaneously. So, what are the key amendments arising from this review, and how can you prepare for these changes? FRS 102 review: key amendments Single lease accounting approach for lessees (Section 20) Under the current model, lessees classify leases as either finance or operating, depending on whether the lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership from the lessor to the lessee. This approach is similar to the model used under old Irish Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and IAS 17 – “Leases”. The FRS 102 amendments will largely align Section 20 with IFRS 16 – “Leases”, eliminating the distinction between finance and operating leases for lessees. This will require lessees to recognise right-of-use assets (ROU) and lease liabilities on the Statement of Financial Position (SOFP) for all leases, apart from short-term leases and low-value assets. Subsequently, the ROU is depreciated over the lease term on a straight-line basis, while the lease liabilities are amortised using the effective interest method, which results in a frontloading of the lease expense, reflecting the underlying financing nature of leases. Let’s illustrate this with an example. Lease term   3 years  Annual payment payable at the end of the year  €50,000  Discount rate (annual)  5% SOFP – lease commencement (rounded to the nearest €000)   ROU / lease liability   €136,000*   *The initial ROU/lease liability is for illustrative purposes only. These should be calculated using the following formula: Present value (PV) of lease payments not paid at that date and discounted using the appropriate discount rate. [PV of €50,000 × 3 years at 5%] In most cases, the ROU and lease liability will be equal to each other on the inception of the lease. Statement of Comprehensive Income (SOCI) – Year 1   ROU depreciation (operating profit)  €45,333 [€136,000 ÷ 3]  Interest on lease liability (finance cost)  €6,800 [€136,000 × 5%] SOFP – Year -1    ROU   €90,667 [€136,000 – €45,333]  Lease liability  €92,800 [€136,000 – €50,000 + €6,800] The amendments provide guidance on what constitutes a lease, how to determine the lease term, how to account for modifications and remeasurements and other practical expedients. It is important not to underestimate the complexity of this new lease model. Consideration must be given to several factors, such as whether an arrangement meets the definition of a lease and how to calculate an appropriate discount rate for every lease. Five-step revenue recognition model (Section 23) The FRS 102 amendments also introduce a comprehensive five-step model for revenue recognition aligning Section 23 of FRS 102 with IFRS 15 – “Revenue from contracts with customers.” The five steps are as follows: Identify the contract(s) with a customer. Identify the performance obligations in the contract. Determine the transaction price. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. Recognise revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The core principle is to align revenue recognition with the transfer of control of goods or services to customers which may either be over time or at a point in time. This also aligns revenue recognition with the contractual terms in relation to the enforceable rights and obligations of the customer and supplier. The five-step model aims to address the challenges in accounting for bundled goods and services by introducing the concept of allocating the consideration from the customer to the separate and distinct performance obligations, representing the promised goods or services within the contract. The amendments also provide guidance on several topics, such as combining two or more contracts entered into, at or near the same time with the same customers, contract modifications and some practical expedients. It is important to note that the new five-step revenue recognition model could alter the timing of revenue recognition, especially for complex contracts with bundled goods and variable consideration. Other important amendments to note The amendments to FRS 102 also contain several incremental improvements and clarifications including, but not limited to, the following: IAS 39 option removal: Entities not already applying IAS 39 recognition and measurement principles for financial instruments can no longer adopt such policies under Section 11 and 12 of FRS 102. Supplier financing: Section 7 of FRS 102 will now require additional disclosures about supplier finance arrangements and their impact on SOFP and cash flows. Fair Value measurement: A new Section 2A (Fair Value Measurement) replaces the Appendix to Section 2 of FRS 102, incorporating the principles of IFRS 13 – “Fair value measurement.” Going concern disclosures: Section 3 of FRS 102 has new requirements for management to affirm consideration of future information and to disclose significant judgments on going concerns. Business combinations: Section 19 of FRS 102 has been updated to include guidance on the identification of an acquirer in a business combination similar to the principles of IFRS 3 – “Business combinations.” Share based payments (SBP): Section 26 of FRS 102 includes enhanced guidance on accounting for vesting conditions, fair value determination and SBPs with cash alternatives. Uncertain tax treatments: Section 29 of FRS 102 includes guidance for uncertain tax treatments, which aligns with IFRIC 23 – “Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments” principles. FRS 102 amendments: next steps We have outlined some practical steps you can take to help prepare for these changes. Assess the impact on your financial statements and business metrics As discussed above, the changes to Leases and Revenue may have a significant impact on financial statements (FS). The new lease accounting model may affect your company’s financial metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) such as EBITDA, net profit and net debt, to name a few. Not only will the changes to KPIs have an impact on the FS but they may also impact your lending arrangements or covenants. For the new revenue model, consideration must be given to how any potential changes to the timing of revenue recognition may impact both reported and forecasted revenue and profits. You will also need to consider how the other amendments listed above will impact the FS and whether you have the necessary in-house expertise on your finance team to carry out the work required to comply with these amendments. Increased disclosure will be required in the notes to the FS, and this may include some new and previously undisclosed information. Understanding these requirements will help guide your accounting processes and the preparation of the FS. Being well-prepared will ensure compliance and transparency in your financial reporting. Consider whether operational changes are required The new lease accounting and revenue recognition models are closely tied to contractual terms and conditions. This will require additional information and financial modelling from contracts. An early assessment of your current accounting processes, systems and controls is essential to identify the necessary operational changes. Other considerations, such as the number of lease agreements and revenue contracts a company may have, will determine the amount of work involved, especially with regard to preparing an amortisation table and the potential need for external valuation expertise to determine an appropriate discount rate for every lease agreement. Determine the best game plan for the transition It is critical to ensure that your finance team is ready for these changes. Engaging your finance team through training courses, workshops and other methods – before and during the transition phase – will be important in ensuring your team fully understands the upcoming changes. Preparing for change: act now The aim of these FRS 102 amendments is to improve financial reporting by aligning FRS 102 more closely with IFRS. Although most of the amendments will not take effect until 2026, early application is allowed if all amendments are adopted simultaneously. Thus, it is critical that companies put a game plan in place today to determine the optimal timing, scope and method for adopting the FRS 102 amendments. The time to act is now. Emer Fitzpatrick is a Senior Manager in PwC Corporate Reporting Services and a member of the Financial Reporting Technical Committee of Chartered Accountants Ireland. Cayetano Bautista III is a Senior Manager in PwC Capital Markets and Accounting Advisory Services.

Ongoing turmoil in Europe’s largest economy will be exacerbated by Donald Trump’s pledged import tariffs, highlighting the need for EU countries to pull together to withstand transatlantic  trade disruption, writes Judy Dempsey Pity Germany’s next government. Olaf Scholz’s successor will have no time to lose when the federal elections end on 25 February 2025, bringing Scholz’s bickering coalition to a close.  Now, the economy is the priority. Germany’s outgoing government believed the old industrial model just needed a bit of tinkering to effectively counter China’s ever-increasing economic presence – but those days are over.  Massive job cuts announced by Volkswagen and ThyssenKrupp (the traditional giants of the car and steel industry, respectively) demonstrate how this government and its predecessor, led by Angela Merkel, failed to prepare for the inevitable impact of de-industrialisation. The replacement of the combustible engine with electric alternatives – which China has rapidly embraced – has been a shock for German industry, which had mistakenly earmarked China as a reliable export market.  No more.  Germany’s high energy costs and fierce competition from Beijing have combined to catalyse the failure of Germany’s old industrial model – so Berlin’s next government must hit the ground running.  This means making the transition from an old industrial base to more modern sectors driven by digital culture.  It means grappling with a demographic crisis that will only cost more unless the government introduces a robust immigration policy to address the huge labour shortages affecting most sectors.  None of this will happen unless Germany’s next leader loosens the ‘debt brake’ constitutionally limiting government spending.  Germany is in dire need of public financing if it is to invest in defence, climate adaptation, security, housing, transport health and education.   The debt brake (and overbearing bureaucracy) has starved investment. The government already has a spending gap of €64 billion for 2025. If, between 2025 and 2030, defence spending targets were to rise from two to three percent of GDP, it would cost another €300 billion.  This German malaise has serious consequences for Europe.  Last year, Germany had the highest level of intra-EU trade, contributing to 21 percent of the European Union’s exports of goods to other countries. What happens in the EU’s largest economy impacts the entire bloc. To make matters worse for Germany’s next Chancellor – and for the EU – is US President-elect Donald Trump’s stated intention to impose a 10 percent tariff on goods imported from Europe and 60 percent on goods from China.  Germany’s export-driven car industry, one of Trump’s targets, is particularly vulnerable and speeding up the manufacturing of electric-driven vehicles would only solve part of the problem. To escape tariffs, it is reasonable to expect the car industry to move manufacturing to the US. This is exactly what Trump wants.  However, back in Germany, the dwindling market in China for German cars could lead to further job losses.  Trump, too, will pile the pressure on Berlin and NATO allies to spend more on defence. It won’t be easy. Not only because of the costs involved but also because Germany’s far-right and far-left parties are opposed to NATO, opposed to supporting Ukraine and generally pro-Russia. All in all, Germany’s ability to deal with its finances, defence and investment issues will be complicated by the Trump administration.  Ultimately, EU countries need to pull together – even integrate – to withstand the pressures on the transatlantic relationship. Judy Dempsey is Nonresident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the December 2024/January 2025 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

Smaller employers completing gender pay gap reports for the first time in 2025 have a wealth of information to draw on but much work ahead, write Aoife Newton and Andrew Egan A lot can be learned from the first three years of gender pay gap reporting in Ireland, which means those employers new to this reporting in 2025 have a wealth of valuable data to learn from.  Many large employers are already producing in-depth and illustrative annual gender pay gap reports. Although primarily focused on statutory reporting requirements, they also reflect best practice approaches to tackling gender pay gaps and outline clear, insightful ways to explain these gaps.  For employers preparing to report for the first time, these reports are worth reading, if only to give you a sense of the approach others have already taken. As much as you can learn from this, however, you should not underestimate the volume of HR, payroll and other data required for gender pay gap reporting, the complexity involved in merging this data, the calculations required and the scrutiny you can expect to face when communicating your findings to stakeholders internally and externally.  Gender pay gap results published in 2025 will be based on data collected over 12 months, typically from July 2024 to June 2025, though the exact dates will depend on each employer’s chosen snapshot date.  This means employers not already focusing on gender representation across their organisation may find themselves having to explain sizable gender pay gaps. With Irish employers employing as little as 50 people in scope for reporting next year, we expect to see a lot more focus on this area from the media, employees and other stakeholders.  Smaller employers are subject to the same legislative requirements as their larger counterparts; there are no exemptions for employers with limited resources. This means they will be required to produce a report reflecting accurate results aligned with 11 statistical gender pay gap metrics along with a narrative detailing the reasons for existing gaps and measures (both existing and planned) to reduce or eliminate these gaps.  New 2024 regulations – new results? The Employment Equality Act 1998 (section 20A) (Gender Pay Gap Information) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 were introduced last May and it will be interesting to see what impact they have on this year’s gender pay gap reporting results. Under the 2024 Regulations, social welfare payments relating to certain periods of protective leave can now be included in gender pay gap calculations. This is a welcome development as it may help reflect parity of payment in line with notional hours worked.  Prior to this, the regulations have only included ‘top-up’ payment made by employers as relevant pay for gender pay calculations, providing that social welfare payments should be excluded (notwithstanding that full hours have been included).  The impact of this approach has been to reflect a lower hourly rate of pay for employees in receipt of certain welfare payments.  For 2024 reporting and beyond, employers will need to include both maternity leave benefit along with a maternity ‘top-up’ payment (i.e. 100% pay) matched with 100 percent hours.  This should reflect a notional increase in pay for women, thus helping to ‘reduce’ an employer’s gender pay gap compared to last year’s reporting. The 2024 Regulations also adjust the treatment of share options and interests in shares. These are now considered benefit-in-kind rather than forming part of bonus payments.   This could have a significant impact on the gender pay results of in-scope employers as benefit-in-kind is not included in either overall gender pay calculations or separate bonus calculations. Previously, share options and interests in shares were included in both.   The issue of actual shares (to be valued on the date of issue) continue to be part of the bonus calculation. So far in 2024, we are seeing steady results in completed reports compared to reports in the two years prior.  Typically, any significant variations in results can be explained by reference to changes in personnel at a senior level or due to business restructures. Both will continue to impact annual reporting.  Comparison is key An important aspect of reporting for many employers is how favourably, or otherwise, they compare with their peers operating in the same sector or industry. For example, if an employer operates in a sector that is traditionally male dominated (e.g. engineering), this will clearly influence their gender pay gap results.  In certain sectors, such as professional services, where employers are recruiting in the same talent pool as their competitors, how their organisation compares to their peers really matters.  Ideally, employers will want to see results that are either “similar to” or “more favourable than” their competitors.  If their results are not, boards and management should query why they are out of line with competitors with a similar resourcing structure recruiting from the same talent pool. In particular, it is worth examining whether there are discriminatory practices behind any results revealing a wide gender pay gap as this could be affecting female representation at the higher levels of the organisation – or perhaps the organisation’s pay and bonus structure is weighted in favour of men?  Ultimately, gender pay gap results serve to root out any embedded issues that may be impeding more equitable pay across the board. New developments in 2025 The biggest change in 2025 will be the extension of the gender pay gap reporting obligation to employers with just 50 employees. In addition to this development, we expect to see some changes to how the gender pay gap reporting process is carried out.  As it stands, employers must include their gender pay gap data and statement of information on their website – or have it available for public inspection.  We understand the Government has issued a tender for the development of an online gender pay gap portal, with development due to start in the coming weeks and testing earmarked for the new year.  It is expected that the portal will have similar functionality to an online gender pay gap portal already in operation in the UK.  If this is the case, the portal will allow employers and other interested parties to compare and contrast results with ease, rather than having to rely on the current, more laborious, manual process.  This new system of reporting is also expected to result in the reporting deadline being brought forward to the end of November 2025.  Employers – both those already reporting and new to the regime – will therefore have a five-month window in which to report, slightly shorter than the current six-month timeframe.  All employers in scope for reporting next year must thus be vigilant and ensure they are up to date at all times with the portal requirements and potential new deadline.  The EU Pay Transparency Directive Looking further ahead, as the EU Pay Transparency Directive (the Directive) is due to be transposed by June 2026, we expect to see many more changes to the reporting regime in the coming years.  The implementation of the new rules under the Directive will not only change the amount of data required but will also align gender pay gap reporting more closely with the employee engagement agenda.   Further, gender pay gap reporting under this Directive will not simply be about producing an annual report of results and narrative; it could also open up data results to scrutiny from trade unions and other employee representatives.  Where there are gaps of more than five percent in any category of worker (these categories are yet to be defined), which cannot be objectively justified and cannot be rectified within a six-month period, the employer may have to engage in a joint pay assessment.  Such joint pay assessments are expected to involve trade unions or other employee representatives.  Employers and all relevant stakeholders should, therefore, be more concerned about how the Directive will shine a light on their organisation’s gender pay gaps, bringing current reporting closer to the principle of equal pay and overall pay transparency.   Acknowledge the gaps Given the additional layer of data scrutiny under the EU Pay Transparency Directive, we are encouraging all employers with gender pay gaps in favour of male employees to commit to deeper analysis.  By better understanding the causes of such gaps at every level of their business, they will find these discrepancies easier to explain (based on objective criteria), and also potentially easier to rectify.  And while not all gaps may be fixable in the short-term, a deep analysis can give employers a good starting point to devise a longer-term solution, as well as greater scope to explain these gaps to legislators with reference to objective criteria. Ultimately, employers who are not focused on gender parity, closing gaps or preparing for the impending new regime, may be exposed to time-consuming and potentially contentious joint pay assessments.  Aoife Newton is Head of Employment and Immigration Law, KPMG Law LLP  Andrew Egan is a Director with KPMG, leading the firm’s tax data and analytics service offering