In his book The Closing of the Auditor’s Mind?, David J. O’Regan, FCA, examines how an erosion of trust in modern auditing might be remedied and reversed. Increasingly fragmented patterns of accountability and social trust are in the ascendant and there are implications for a crucial area of our socio-economic existence—internal auditing. Internal auditing faces not only a challenge of adaptability to emerging patterns of accountability and social trust, it is also confronted by broader challenges of reforms required to encourage such adaptability. One might prefer the term “crises” to “challenges” but let us avoid leavening our analysis with hyperbolic language. Nonetheless, the severity of internal auditing’s two contemporaneous and interconnected challenges discussed is not to be underestimated. Should the challenges remain unaddressed, they may well develop into profound crises. Regarding the first challenge of adaptability, internal auditing has failed to keep pace with global trends toward a flattening of traditional, vertical hierarchies of the command-and-control variety, and their replacement with complex patterns of horizontally distributed accountability and social trust. Our trust in traditional institutions and in politicians, business leaders and the cultural elite is eroding. We are increasingly placing trust in non-hierarchical networks, both digital and human. And where trust has been displaced, flows of accountability adapt accordingly. The emergent patterns of accountability and social trust are so far-reaching that they threaten to leave internal auditing marooned, like a shipwreck, in the detritus of history. Internal auditing is therefore at a crossroads, both practical and conceptual. The most demanding needs of accountability and social trust increasingly fall into three domains – in the inner workings of organisations; in transitional spaces at organisational boundaries; and in extra-mural activities. Internal auditing remains fixated on the innards of traditional, bureaucratic structures and is ill-positioned to address the assurance demands arising at both the liminal spaces at the fringes of formal organisational structures and from locations beyond institutional boundaries. The peripheral and external domains are characterised by an absence of clear markers of responsibilities, and by fast, flexible and disorienting flows of accountability that bear little resemblance to the shape of traditional bureaucracy. Their records of accountability are typically digital rather than tangible, and the significance of their assurance demands defies easy evaluation. Importantly for our analysis in this book, we encounter the new patterns of accountability and social trust where the writ of internal auditing, as well as external auditing, runs weakest. The versatility of both internal and external auditing is hampered by restraints. The external auditor’s opinion on an organisation’s annual financial statements once satisfied the assurance needs of traditional hierarchies of accountability and social trust, but it is ill-equipped to meet the demands of the emergent, horizontally distributed accountability paradigm. In contrast to external auditing, internal auditing’s activities are framed in more elastic terms, and internal auditing therefore offers, on paper at least, a greater scope for adaptation. Yet internal auditing, like external auditing, faces an uncertain future, owing to the need for the types of reform without which the necessary agility and adaptation are unlikely to develop. At this point, a word of caution is in order. Even amid the newly emerging patterns of horizontally distributed accountability, bureaucratic organisations characterised by command-and-control structures will continue to exist. A demand for external and internal auditors’ services will therefore remain, as long as stakeholders continue to be interested in financial statements and in the inner workings of organisations. But the real action on accountability and social trust will increasingly be found elsewhere on the fringes of organisations and in extra-mural locations. Already, assurance is becoming increasingly piecemeal. We can expect the emergence, in the near future, of innovative, diffuse assurance mechanisms to address the pressing demands of the new patterns of accountability and social trust. Both external and internal auditing therefore face a future of marginalisation as they remain shackled to the outdated frameworks of bureaucratic institutions. Internal auditing faces not only a challenge of adaptability. It also contends with a second challenge arising from its increasing tendency toward algorithmic and mechanistic activities. In particular, the dangers arising from a swelling tide of amoral and pedantic literalism in internal auditing are difficult to overstate. A humane approach to internal auditing founded on creativity, individual judgment, and critical thinking. In this context, there is a sense of loss that seems an inevitable accompaniment to progress. Or, perhaps more accurately, an accompaniment to misplaced notions of progress. Internal auditors today have at their disposal vast pools of data, along with powerful technological tools that mine and arrange the data into auditable information. Technological advances encourage internal auditors to approach well-worn topics in fresh ways and to explore newfangled activities. Only a Luddite would be hostile to technological advances in internal auditing, from data analytics to the use of drones for the purposes of aerial surveillance of dispersed inventory. But internal auditing’s technological achievements have come at a high cost – as an addictive substitute for critical thinking. Internal auditors are increasingly gripped by an algorithmic mindset, and they tend to look at technology, not as a means to an end, but as an end in itself. This technologically driven approach has crowded out arduously gained humane aspects of internal auditing. The relentless, metallic clatter of technological advance does not therefore necessarily imply improvements in understandings of underlying concepts. Our collective faith in data analytics and sampling software has created the seductive but dangerous myth that we are better auditors than our predecessors. We seem unaware that accretions of prowess in data handling and number-crunching often offer little more than illusions of certainty, if not groundless uncertainties. The technology of internal auditing may progress, but the cogency of the concepts and principles of internal auditing remain enduring. Diagnostic acumen, analytical rigor, inferential precision, a healthy scepticism, and a resistance to transient faddism are unchanging prerequisites for good internal auditing, and our progressive internal auditing environment now needs them more than ever. Modern internal auditing does not lack energy. However misplaced, its enthusiasm is in constant motion, exuding an exaggerated sense of industriousness. But the blustering, frenetic pace of internal auditing today masks an underlying intellectual inertia, a kind of hallucinatory lassitude in which highly agitated activity serves only to endow clockwork routines with decreasing significance. Beneath whirlwinds of risk assessments, data analytics, and trending buzzwords, and beyond the dubious recommendations that often flow from such mechanisms, we see process increasingly triumphant over substance. It is at internal auditing’s eerily muted core where the absence of timeless concepts of validity and truth are most keenly felt. A technocratic conformity is descending on internal auditing like a smothering shroud, leaving us with muffled reverberations of futile routines, hollow platitudes, and a steady decline in the public’s trust. Only a fundamental overhaul of internal auditing’s self-understanding and methodologies, driven by a tempering of its algorithmic mindset, will open the door to a return to a style of auditing marked by creativity and judgment. Without such an overhaul, internal auditing is unlikely to survive a take-over by automated auditing software and machine-processed artificial intelligence, let alone adapt to the evolving paradigm of accountability and social trust. About the author David J. O’Regan has authored nine books on auditing and related themes. A Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, he earned a doctorate in accounting and finance from the University of Liverpool and his auditing experience spans more than three decades, in the private, public and academic sectors. O’Regan joined the United Nations system in 2005, working initially at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons at The Hague in the Netherlands. He has served as Auditor General to the Pan American Health Organization in Washington D.C. since 2009. For more, see davidoregan.com.

The Statement on Internal Control is critical to the effective risk management and governance of Ireland’s State bodies. Tom Ward and Níall Fitzgerald offer their best practice insights Recent challenges faced by Irish entities in the public, non-profit and private sector have emphasised for many boards (and, where relevant, their funding bodies) the critical importance of the adequacy and operational effectiveness of internal controls, risk management and governance. Ultimately, a systematic and proactive approach to testing and reviewing controls, addressing weaknesses and implementing remedial actions in a timely manner, can only enhance confidence in public sector governance and best practice. In this regard, the Statement on Internal Control (SIC) plays a crucial role. State bodies in Ireland are required to report on all of their internal controls, risk management and governance in their annual SIC in accordance with the Irish Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies 2016 (Code of Practice).  Such reporting encompasses financial, business, operational and compliance controls and State bodies are subject to a swathe of such controls as standard, spanning: The discharge of public business. Project delivery and cost management. Monitoring and control of assets. Fraud prevention and detection. IT systems and technology (including cybersecurity).  Procurement. Additional controls specific to the nature of each bodies’ activities include clinical governance for public hospitals, infrastructure guidelines for large infrastructural projects and controls relating to onward funding to other public bodies or non-profits. The SIC must acknowledge the Board’s responsibility for ensuring that effective internal control systems are in place, the approach taken to reviewing these systems to ensure they are working (including steps taken by the Board and its Committees) and must identify any significant weaknesses or breaches. While the format for the SIC is prescribed, the content should be tailored according to the size and complexity of the organisation. However, there is limited guidance on the extent to which the Board should tailor this approach and content. At a recent SIC event co-hosted by Chartered Accountants Ireland and the Institute of Public Administration’s Governance Forum, Andy Harkness, from the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG) Office, provided examples of SIC best practice for State bodies, including the need for:  Good documentation clearly explaining the work carried out to support the review of controls; Assurance statements provided by senior managers; The involvement of the internal audit team, including key changes arising from their reviews and recommendations; and  If appropriate, an assurance statement from  independent assurance service providers.  Within this approach, the C&AG highlighted the importance of documenting any issues that may arise and adequately supporting any work undertaken to ensure that significant risks have been identified, including risks arising from changes to the control environment. Also emphasised was the importance of assessing the effectiveness of the controls in place, the assurance results and the effectiveness of follow-up steps taken in response to any control deficiencies identified.  Board and board committees should minute their review and conclusions with regard to the effectiveness of the systems of internal controls under review, and record recommended changes to governance, internal controls and risk management matters arising from the review. Also speaking at the recent SIC event, several experienced non-executive directors provided examples of the approaches they have taken to preparing the SIC within their organisation. In particular, they noted challenges associated with the absence of formal guidance and the ambiguity surrounding the term “operating effectiveness”, which is typically associated with Sarbanes–Oxley applying to companies listed on the US Stock Exchange.  In an Anglo-Irish context, assurance on the effectiveness of controls has traditionally been limited to financial and reporting controls. This is, however, changing. To achieve best practice in SIC reporting, the Boards of State bodies in Ireland may currently rely on: Guidance issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in Britain in relation to the UK Corporate Governance; International Standards on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3402 Reports; Sarbanes–Oxley literature for directors and auditors;  Guidance or circulars issued by the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Services, Reform and Digitalisation or the C&AG; and General assurance standards and guidance. Some best practice insights for State boards arising from the recent SIC event include: The benefit in defining, adopting and communicating a common framework for performing the review of internal controls. The importance of the work needed to support and underpin the SIC. The need to ensure that the findings reported in the SIC are consistent with other supporting documentation approved and minuted by the Board. The need to disclose any scope limitations encountered in the processes necessary to support the SIC and to consider their impact on the directors’ assertion on compliance with the Code and SIC requirements. Above all, the importance of understanding that the reporting of significant weakness is just one part of the equation—this must be accompanied by reporting on the steps since taken (or to be taken) to address these weaknesses. The focus on robust internal controls, comprehensive risk management and effective governance remains a critical requirement for State bodies.  The SIC is not just a compliance requirement; it also serves as a reflection of the organisation’s commitment to transparency, accountability and continuous improvement.  As State bodies navigate evolving challenges and expectations, adopting a standardised yet adaptable framework, combined with clear guidance, will strengthen overall SIC governance practice.    Dr Tom Ward is Senior Governance Specialist, Professional Development, with the Institute of Public Administration Níall Fitzgerald, FCA, is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Colette Devey, Risk Consulting Partner, Chief Risk Officer and Consumer Sector Lead with EY Ireland, talks us through her impressive career path and some of the important lessons she has learned along the way. Colette Devey was appointed Chief Risk Officer at EY Ireland in September 2024. Devey also leads EY Ireland’s Consumer Products and Retail Practice and is a Partner in the firm’s Risk Consulting Business. She joined EY in 2003 and became a Partner in 2019. Tell us a bit about yourself and why you decided to become a Chartered Accountant? I grew up in Raheny in Dublin and attended Manor House School before moving on to University College Dublin. I chose a degree in business and legal studies because I felt it would offer promising career options in both the legal and finance fields. Initially, I thought I would become a lawyer, but over the course of my four-year degree, I realised my strengths lay in business and finance. This realisation led me to choose a career in finance, joining the assurance practice of a big four firm in London to train as a Chartered Accountant and working with clients in the financial services sector. How has your career evolved from qualification through to your current role with EY Ireland? After qualifying, I spent two more years in London, building my experience and learning to manage client engagements. It was an exciting time to be in the city and I was very lucky to have college friends who moved over at the same time. There was a great Irish gang of us all together. The work environment in which I began my career was very different to today. My work was 100 percent client- or office-based with much less technology and it was still quite male-dominated. The firm had just two female partners at the time and, in many of the teams I worked on, I was the only woman. After five years in London, I was ready for a change and moved to Sydney, Australia, for two years. It was there I first had the opportunity to work as a consultant, rather than an auditor, and I immediately knew this was the area I wanted to progress my career in. As a Risk Consultant, I discovered I enjoyed the operational aspects of businesses, from the shop floor or factory site through to profit and loss and the balance sheet. This role allowed me to leverage my core accounting skills while also gaining deep knowledge in process, risk and controls, and I have since continued to build my career in this specialism. I joined EY Ireland in Dublin in 2003, then spent 15 years in consulting with EY UK. After returning to Dublin in 2022, I took up the position of EY Ireland Consulting Partner and Consumer Sector Lead. In this role, I work extensively with local and international businesses in the agricultural, consumer products and retail sectors, helping them navigate a rapidly changing landscape driven by evolving consumer behaviour, regulatory changes and emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI). I also lead our work on the Irish EY Future Consumer Index, which tracks changing consumer sentiment and behaviours bi-annually, identifying new trends and emerging segments. Talk us through your day-to-day work as Chief Risk Officer with EY Ireland. My role as Chief Risk Officer is very broad and complements my continued service to clients across our 150-strong Risk Consulting team here in Ireland. My team and I focus on ensuring EY Ireland manages and mitigates a number of key risks. This can range from data privacy and protection—where we work closely with colleagues on our legal team to assess the data risks arising from the introduction of new technology, notably AI—through to assessing the implications of external events. This might be social or, as in more recent months, weather-related. On top of day-to-day matters, there are also times when we have to react quickly to protect the firm, our people and our clients—from cyber risks, in particular. As an example, when the CrowdStrike software update caused significant outages globally, we had to immediately consider what impact this might have on our clients. Thankfully, in this instance, the impact was minimal. What do you enjoy most about your current role, and what are the challenges? What I enjoy most is the variety and this has continued to be the case over the course of my entire career to date. No two days are the same. My team and I need to be very agile so that we can quickly reprioritise activities and plans based on changing circumstances. This also brings challenges, such as tight deadlines or the need for fast decision-making. In my experience, however, these challenges are easily overcome when there is a strong and aligned team working together and communicating effectively. This is something I am very grateful to have with my current team. Are you glad you made the decision to qualify as a Chartered Accountant at the start of your career? Yes, without a doubt. My qualification as a Chartered Accountant has opened many doors and opportunities for me throughout my career. It has been foundational to the work I do with my clients, whether that is delivering internal audit services, transforming governance, risk and internal control frameworks, or supporting the implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) requirements, mandating strict reforms to improve financial disclosures and prevent accounting fraud. Although much of this work focuses on strategic, operational and compliance risks, we are never too far away from considering the financial impact on the business. Did you have a career plan starting out? How have your career goals evolved in the years since? If I am completely honest, no, I didn’t set out with a long-term career plan. I knew I wanted to become a Chartered Accountant and work for organisations offering opportunities for career progression, alongside enriching professional and personal experiences. I didn’t set out with the end in mind and could not have imagined some of the opportunities I have had along the way, including working with incredible clients, fantastic teams and on exciting projects while also being able to live and travel all over the world. In the early part of my career, my approach was to say ‘yes’ to every opportunity that came along. In more recent years—and particularly since I set myself the goal of becoming a Partner—my goal setting has become more deliberate and focused. I want to keep growing and developing my professional experience and expertise, while also creating opportunities and experiences for my team and colleagues. Tell us about the most important professional lessons you have learned in your career. The three most important professional career lessons I have learned over the years are: Be the role model for others you would have wanted for yourself. Listen to those around you and take their feedback on board—but, ultimately, you have to trust and believe in yourself. Most importantly, never forget that clients are individuals with their own aspirations and plans. Developing strong relationships at a personal level, as well as professionally, typically leads to healthy, trust-based and long-term client relationships. How has the role of the Chartered Accountant evolved since you first joined the profession, and how do you think it will change in the years ahead? The biggest change I have observed in our profession relates to technology and how it continues to impact the work we do. First, there is the role technology plays in business, creating risk, but also opportunity. Second, technology is now key to delivering accounting, auditing and consulting services. When I first started with a big four firm in London, we didn’t even have individual laptops. Instead, each engagement team had just one Mac computer, which came with its own wheely bag. The most junior person on the team (i.e. me) had to bring it to and from the office and client sites! Times have changed so much since then, and I believe technology—in particular, data—will continue to play a critical role in our profession’s future development as emerging technologies, including AI, become even more prominent in business, accounting, risk consulting and wider society. What advice would you offer young Chartered Accountants about forging a successful and fulfilling career? My advice would be to take the time to truly understand your strengths, consider where and how you want to grow and develop professionally, and identify the roles that will give you energy and motivation while also allowing you to be your authentic self. With these strands in place and the Chartered Accountancy qualification behind you, you will be in a strong position to grasp opportunities for a rewarding and enriching career. What are your career plans from here on in? That is a very good question! With EY’s new global leader, Janet Truncale, and our ‘All In’ global strategy in place, there are many exciting developments ahead. For now, my focus is on my clients, growing our business and developing the teams I work with, as well as ensuring we manage and mitigate the risks we face as a firm. These responsibilities are more than enough to keep me busy for the time being, but I am always open to new experiences and opportunities, so I will keep an open mind as to where my career will take me in the future—as everyone reading this should.

Resilire founder Joyce McCarthy, FCA, is helping scaling organisations embed a sustainable growth culture that supports people and boosts resilience “Recalibrate. Resolve. Rise.” When Joyce McCarthy launched her HR advisory and coaching firm Resilire in September 2024, she knew exactly where her focus needed to be. Inspired by her own experience re-evaluating her career and life priorities in response to events beyond her control, McCarthy resolved to use this very personal insight to help others prepare for, overcome and learn from professional challenges and setbacks. “Resilire comes from the Latin word for ‘resilient’. When I decided I wanted to set up my own business and work for myself, there was never any doubt about what my focus would be; I knew it had to be about helping people to embrace change and build resilience to achieve their goals.” McCarthy had begun her own career training in Dublin as a Chartered Accountant before moving into banking, first in Australia and then the UK, where her career focus shifted first to sales and then to people and performance management, and organisational culture. “When I moved to London, I started a new job at a large organisation managing a big team and leading innovation in people management,” McCarthy says. “We were overseeing all aspects of performance management from metrics to bonuses, rewards and recognition schemes, and really focusing on how to innovate and improve this whole area. “That was when I started to think seriously about what the culture of an organisation really means, and the level of stress individuals can experience when they are under pressure to perform.” McCarthy “absolutely loved” her work and was delighted when she was promoted to director level and selected for fast-track progression through the organisation’s senior ranks. “Then, I got pregnant. I had just started my new role and I didn’t want to have to go on maternity leave, but I remember the doctor saying to me, ‘You need to prioritise your health and your pregnancy now,’ and that was a shock to me at the time.” McCarthy endured a difficult birth and serious complications with the arrival of her first child. “I was recovering when I was told my employer was carrying out a cost-cutting exercise and essentially downsizing,” she says. “I felt I needed to rush back to work early from maternity leave to try to claim a chair, but, essentially, the music stopped and I had nowhere to sit.” Losing her job in this way was a shock for McCarthy. “My whole world was completely rocked,” she says. “I had gone back to work before I had physically or emotionally recovered. I already felt vulnerable and then I was told my job was at risk of being made redundant. “At the time, I felt really let down by my employer and that’s when I started to think, ‘I need to be my own boss and never again depend on an employer’. The experience also opened McCarthy’s eyes to the very human cost of high-pressure work environments built solely to service the bottom line. “It gave me a lot of empathy for other people and their circumstances. I went from being really focused on performance, productivity, output and just working really, really hard, to questioning everything and asking myself, ‘am I going too fast here?’ “I was a first-time parent and really unwell for the first time in my life. I had to stop and think, ‘There’s more to life than work; your health and the health of your family is so much more important’.” McCarthy subsequently decided to complete a diploma course in resilience coaching and left London in 2021 to return to Dublin with her husband and young family. She established Resilire six months ago, specialising in talent and performance management strategy alongside executive coaching. “My focus is on supporting scaling businesses to reach their potential by helping them with people and culture goals,” McCarthy says. “This is especially important to me because Ireland is just such an entrepreneurial, relationship-focused country.  “When I came back home, I started building a network of wonderful, supportive entrepreneurial people almost straight away.  “These entrepreneurs and others like them build amazing businesses, but when these businesses reach a certain size, they are going to need to define their own identity from a people perspective, and that’s where I come in.” Culture is key to resilience in any organisation, McCarthy says, and embedding a culture of   psychological safety and trust is paramount in a growing company. “Blame culture really doesn’t support business performance,” she says. “The focus should always be the end goal. As long as you’re focused on that bigger goal, you can absorb and withstand the little mistakes that happen along the way, the things that go wrong and the unexpected events and setbacks. “Ultimately, people need to know that they can be open and honest; that it is safe to raise issues; and that the people around them have their back. “Embedding a ‘test and learn’ environment that encourages people to fail fast with no repercussions actually encourages innovation and boosts performance.” In tandem, it is important for employers to understand that their people are multi-faceted humans with full lives outside work, who are often contending with a whole plethora of competing and shifting demands. “People are not bots; they’re not widgets. They don’t just show up to work to perform a task. Typically, people have a lot more going on in their lives than work, and their resilience can be depleted over time by a whole range of factors, be they family-, health- or money-related. “That is why, I think rightly, we are seeing the people management focus shift towards wellbeing as a holistic concept. “At the end of the day, people want to be seen and supported at work; to feel that they can share their challenges in a safe environment; and to be recognised for their contribution and all the ‘small wins’ along the way. “This is what performance management is really about, I think, and helping companies build a culture that genuinely supports it is my core focus with Resilire.”  

Seamus Parle is leading the way at Rotary Ireland in his role as District Governor of the international organisation on Irish soil, writes Barry McCall. The move to semi-retirement in 2023 allowed Wicklow-based Seamus Parle to devote more time to his voluntary work with Rotary Ireland, ultimately taking on the role of District Governor of the all-island organisation in July 2024. For Parle, the role marks an important milestone in his professional endeavours, allowing him to apply skills learned over the course of a successful career for the betterment of society. “Rotary is dedicated to serving communities both here and abroad, and through its voluntary work, provides an excellent platform for people to develop socially and professionally,” he explains. “Rotary members are people with a social conscience who want to put their skills and expertise into the service of the community. “Whether it’s supporting a health or education project here in Ireland, providing housing for families in Ukraine or funding a water pump project in rural Kenya, Rotary has no shortage of projects for people to become involved in.” Professional career Parle’s professional career began in 1975 with Bank of Ireland. “There weren’t many jobs around at the time. When I left the bank four years later, people said I needed my head examined. But I was studying accountancy at the time, and it was difficult to get to classes in Dublin from Baltinglass, Co. Wicklow, where I was working,” he says. From Bank of Ireland, Parle moved to engineering company TMG Group as an Assistant Accountant. “It was in Wexford and even further away from my classes,” he recalls, “But I got practical hands-on experience of doing accounts and I then moved to Waterford Iron Foundry.” His next move saw him take up a role with Ballyfree Farms in Wicklow. “I qualified as a Management Accountant (CIMA) while I was there. The company was taken over a number of times, most recently by Kerry Group. If I wanted to progress my career, I had to be prepared to move to Tralee or even further afield. Our first child was on the way and that wasn’t for me.” This led to Parle’s move into practice. “I went to work for my friend Cathal Cooney at his practice. The plan was to stay for a year while looking for another role in industry. I was still there 33 years later—I never escaped,” he jokes. “After industry, I found the diversity of practice work very enjoyable. You are involved in totally different assignments from one day to the next. In industry, it’s pretty much the same every day. “After a few years, I realised I wouldn’t be able to sign audit reports as a Management Accountant, so I did the CPA exams to become a Certified Public Accountant. In 2023, we merged with a larger firm which allowed me to retire from the practice.” Parle’s involvement with Rotary dates back to his taking over from Cathal Cooney as Managing Partner of Cooney Parle & Co. Accountants (now GBW Cooney Parle & Co. Accountants) in 2012. “Cathal had always looked after business development while I stayed in the office. I had to step into his role and decided to do some networking, so I joined Rotary,” he explains. Parle became Wicklow Club President in 2014 and Assistant Governor with responsibility for eight clubs in 2016. “I became District Treasurer with responsibility for finance for Ireland in 2018 and, on 1 July 2024, became District Governor for the Rotary organisation on the island of Ireland for a one-year term.” Rotary history and development Rotary Ireland has 1,450 members while the international organisation has 1.2 million members at 35,000 clubs in over 200 countries worldwide. “Rotary was founded in 1905 as a business networking group by four people in Chicago,” Parle explains. “They decided that if each of them recommended each other to their contacts, all the businesses would grow as a result. If you want to recommend someone, you need to know that they will do a good job, so you need to know them quite well. “They met weekly in each other’s offices on a rotational basis, hence the name. The businesses prospered and after a few years, they decided to give back a proportion of those gains to the community.” The first beneficiary was the community in a town outside Chicago. The nearest doctor’s horse had died, depriving the town of access to the doctor. The Chicago Rotary Club solved the problem by buying a new horse for the doctor. The second project was the construction of a new public convenience in the city of Chicago. “Such facilities were quite novel at the time,” Parle says. The Irish connection goes back a long way. “The first Rotary Club outside North America was in Dublin. The ‘Dublin Number 1’ club was founded in 1911 and is still meeting today. That’s the origin story.” Rotary was founded for business and social networking and to provide an opportunity for people to perform community service and for their own self development in areas like project management, teamwork and leadership, Parle explains. “Involvement teaches members about work and life and gives them a different perspective on things. Members also have access to all 35,000 clubs around the world. I was in Brazil recently and had the privilege of visiting the Rotary Club of Copacabana.” Rotary club members are drawn from all walks of life, and each brings something to the table. Accountants can be particularly valuable, Parle points out. “Every club needs a Treasurer. In Rotary, you are dealing with other people’s money, whether that’s the members’ money or money raised through charity fundraising. Accountants have high ethical standards, are skilled at making the most effective use of scarce resources and are seen as a safe pair of hands.” Irish Rotary Club projects Irish Rotary Clubs have been involved in a range of projects in recent years. These include the annual Trees of Remembrance, a Christmas initiative hosted in many shopping centres around the country. “Just over half the clubs in Ireland are involved in that. People can write a note to remember a loved one who has passed on or is ill and can make a donation which usually goes to an end-of-life charity,” Parle explains. Another initiative has seen Rotary Clubs tackle waste at the same time as providing bicycles to schoolchildren in Africa. “A number of years ago, we got €250,000 from the Government’s anti-dumping initiative. We used that to put containers in recycling centres to allow people to dump unwanted bikes,” Parle says. “We bring them to Loughan House and Shelton Abbey open prisons for refurbishment where the prisoners acquire skills in bike maintenance. The bicycles are shipped to Gambia where students might live a two- or three-hour walk from their school. Having a bicycle leads to better educational outcomes for them.” Other projects involve road safety advisory sessions for transition year students in Ireland and the provision of microcredits to people starting businesses in the developing world. Parle also mentions a former winner of Rotary’s Youth Leadership Development Competition—Rotary honorary life member, former Taoiseach and current Tánaiste Simon Harris. “Simon learned a lot through his involvement in Rotary and it shows the benefits of becoming involved at a young age regardless of whichever party you support or are a member of,” he says. New members are always welcome. “New members from different backgrounds, with different perspectives, all are welcome, and we would really like to see more young people, particularly women, joining,” Parle says. “In Ireland, we have clubs throughout the country. People interested in joining can contact their Rotary Club through Rotary.ie. We have people waiting to respond to membership enquiries. They are all volunteers, we have no paid staff, no offices and no admin costs as such. “Through Rotary, I’ve learned so much and met so many wonderful people from all over the island of Ireland and beyond. Quite simply, joining Rotary was the best decision I made this century.”

Cormac Lucey examines recent election turmoil in Romania, questioning the fragility of democratic processes and need for greater scrutiny in safeguarding electoral integrity We pride ourselves that our modern societies are democracies, but what if this is a comforting illusion? What if the foundations of our democracies are considerably more fragile than we imagine? Some recent developments suggest that caution is warranted. Last November, Romania held its first round of presidential elections. As nobody secured an overall majority, the second run-off round was due to be held on 8 December.  On 6 December, however, the Romanian Constitutional Court annulled the election, alleging Russian interference in the first-round outcome, which had been won by Calin Georgescu, a “Romanian far-right politician, agronomist and prominent conspiracy theorist, who worked in the field of sustainable development”, according to Wikipedia. Four days earlier, on 2 December, the Court had confirmed the first round results despite vote-rigging allegations.  It appears that intelligence agency reports alleging that TikTok had been used to spread political disinformation caused the Romanian Constitutional Court to change its mind. The election is now scheduled to be re-run in May, six months after the original, aborted election.  There are at least four concerns I have with this chain of events.  First, elections have always been battlegrounds of contention. One should not be able to cancel a democratic election without hard evidence of sustained manipulation. Is the assertion that untruths were told on TikTok now sufficient to overturn the election results of a democracy?  Second, the intelligence types asserting that social media fatally undermined the recent Romanian election are the same sort of people who claimed, in the run-up to the 2020 US election, that the disclosure of Hunter Biden’s emails had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation”. We now know that those emails (suggesting criminal behaviour by members of the Biden family) were true.  Those intelligence operatives who untruthfully dismissed the emails in 2020 were granted a pre-emptive Presidential Pardon by Joe Biden as he departed the White House.  Third, if democracy is as important as we are regularly told it is, why is Romania delaying the re-run of its cancelled November 2024 election until May 2025?  Fourth, while the mass media in Britain and Ireland cover in astonishing detail every twist and turn in American politics, there has been almost total silence regarding the cancellation of the results of a modern European democracy on pretty flimsy grounds.  It brings to mind the warning issued by Alexander Solzhenitsyn—the Russian dissident, Nobel laureate in literature and author of “The First Circle” and “The Gulag Archipelago”—shortly after he first arrived in the Western world in 1978 having been let out of the Soviet Union. Solzhenitsyn said: “The Western world has lost its civic courage…Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling and intellectual elite, causing an impression of a loss of courage by the entire society.” The UK’s 2016 vote to exit the European Union and last year’s vote for Trump to reprise his role as US President were as much votes of no confidence in those countries’ ruling political establishments, as they were votes in favour of the outcome.   There is a danger, in an ever more atomised world, that we—part of the ruling and intellectual elite—take democracy for granted, assume that everyone else is doing their job properly and fail to do our bit to sustain the system.  As Chartered Accountants, we are highly trained guardians and interpreters of fact at a time when the facts are increasingly in dispute. Maybe it’s time for us to speak a little louder in public debate.  Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the February/March 2025 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees or the editor.