In the news

This item has been updated since its original publication on 20 June 2024 following coming into force of 14th EU package of sanctions. Readers will be aware that since June 2022 there has been an EU ban on the provision of accounting services to the Russian government and legal entities and persons established in Russia. The banned services include accounting, auditing, including statutory audit, bookkeeping or tax consulting services. Click for more information on the ban on provision of accounting services on  the Institute’s website. Within the regulation imposing the ban there is an exemption for the provision of services intended for the exclusive use of Russian entities which are subsidiaries of EU companies and companies established in certain other allied jurisdictions (The list of jurisdictions has been updated in the 14th package). However, with the 12th package of sanctions, introduced in December 2023 came a wind down of the exemption permitting the provision of restricted business services to those subsidiaries. This wind down had originally been set for 20 June 2024 after which a licence from EU Member States will be required to continue providing services to Russian affiliates. However, the 14th package of sanctions extended this wind down date to 30 September 2024. The 14th package also introduces an exemption from the ban whereby EU nationals that are residents of Russia (and were so before 24 February 2022) are permitted to provide the prohibited professional services, excluding software, to EU/Western-owned subsidiaries who are their employers. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

Introduction Readers will know that sanctions are adopted at EU level but may or may not be aware that enforcement relies on member states amongst which definitions of sanctions violation and associated penalties vary. These inconsistencies led to a concern in the EU about undermining of the EU sanctions regime and that potential offenders would deliberately act in jurisdictions where penalties were lighter. Click here for a briefing document by the EU Parliament which wrote ”…The significant differences between national systems, particularly in terms of offences and penalties for breaches of EU sanctions, are thought to weaken their efficacy and the EU's credibility….”  On 24 April 2024 the European Union adopted a directive to harmonise criminal offences for violation of EU sanctions. (the “Directive”). Click here for a link to a European Parliament press release on the Directive. The Directive was introduced to limit sanctions circumvention and to tighten enforcement. The Directive provides a common definition of what constitutes a violation of EU sanctions and provides for penalties for the violation of European Union restrictive measures. The Directive provides for criminalisation for an intentional violation of sanctions but also where there is serious negligence in the circumstances set out in the Directive. It also criminalises attempted violations. What constitutes a criminal offence and exemptions? Article 3 sets out conduct constituting a criminal offence. These include failing to freeze funds, not respecting travel bans or goods embargoes, transferring funds to persons subject to sanctions, or doing business with state-owned entities of countries under sanction. Providing financial services in violation of sanctions will also become a punishable offence. Inciting, aiding, or abetting the commission of offences is also a criminal offence. Member states can exempt conduct from criminal sanction for violations involving funds, economic resources, goods, services, transactions, or activities of a value of less than €10,000.  An exemption is also given for legal professionals regarding information obtained while ascertaining the legal position of a client or defending or representing judicial proceedings. There is also an exemption for providing humanitarian assistance. Penalties The Directive provides for prison sentences and fines. It also includes measures such as withdrawal of permits and authorisations, disqualifications, and temporary bans on running for public office. For natural persons penalties can be between one and five years’ imprisonment depending on the seriousness of the offence. The Directive also provides for liability and penalties for legal persons. Maximum fines can be from 1% to 5% of worldwide turnover of a legal person, depending on the offence. Directive on combatting money laundering by criminal law (2018/1673) amended The definition of criminal activity is amended in this directive to add the violation of Union restrictive measures as a new criminal activity. Entry into force The Directive enters into force on 19 May 2024 and member states have until 20 May 2025 to implement it into national law. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.  

In the UK the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has recently launched a UK Financial Sanctions FAQs webpage. Ninety-one questions and answers are listed including featured FAQs “Are UK entities’ subsidiaries located outside the UK expected to comply with UK sanctions? “and “How do the fees and expenses caps apply? Is it per DP (i.e., for all a DP’s matters across all law firms) or is it per law firm being instructed by a DP?”   This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

The UK Government published its first sanctions strategy on 22 February 2024. The strategy addresses how it uses sanctions as a foreign and security policy tool. It sets out the continued investment, partnerships and structures that support UK government sanctions and the cross-government architecture built to deliver sanctions. It outlines the partnerships developed with the private sector, NGOs, and international partners, and the steps being taking to strengthen sanctions implementation and enforcement. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

Twelfth sanctions package The EU  adopted a twelfth package of sanctions on 18 December 2023.Please see attached press release providing details . Some of the measures include a new obligation to contractually prohibit re-exportation of sensitive goods to Russia. Exporters will be required to contractually prohibit the re-exportation to Russia and re-exportation for use in Russia when selling, supplying, transferring or exporting to a third country (with certain exceptions) goods or technology such as aviation and space items, jet fuel and additives and firearms and other arms and ammunition . Other measures include financial restrictions such as a ban on Russian nationals owning, controlling or holding any posts on the governing bodies of those providing crypto-asset wallet, account or custody services to Russian persons and residents. The existing prohibition on the provision of services will be extended to include a ban on the provision of software for the management of enterprises and software for industrial design and manufacture. A new measure is introduced that will require the notification of certain transfers of funds out of the EU from EU entities directly or indirectly owned by more than 40% by Russians or entities established in Russia. Member States must designate by October 31, 2024, a national authority to identify and trace funds and economic resources belonging to, or owned, held, or controlled by designated individuals and entities located in their jurisdiction, to prevent and detect attempts or instances of sanctions violations or circumvention. Click here for Q&A from the European Commission on the twelfth package and here to see the consolidated FAQs from the European Commission. OFSI Annual review On 14 December 2023, the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) published its Annual Review for the financial year 2022 to 2023. It states that in the medium term the outlook indicates continued intensity for financial sanctions. The report contains reporting on assets frozen under UK financial sanctions regulations. The review discloses that £22.7 billion of assets have been frozen in relation to Russia and OFSI staffing has increased significantly. However, there has been no fines for a post-Feb 2022 sanctions breach in relation to the UK's Russia sanctions regime. Penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures  Currently member states have different definitions of what constitutes a violation of restrictive measures and what penalties should be applied in the event of such a violation. On 12 December 2023 the EU Council and Parliament reach political agreement to criminalise violation of EU sanctions .Please click here for the proposal made by the EU council in May 2023  in relation to the definition of criminal offences and penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures  , the press release of June 2023 and the press release on December 2023  . This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.    

On 17 November 2023 HM Treasury published guidance on Ownership and Control: Public Officials and Control guidance. The guidance sets out that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office  does not generally consider designated public officials to exercise control over a public body in which they hold a leadership function, such that the affairs of that public body should be considered to be conducted in accordance with the wishes of that individual. However, if there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the designated individual exercises control over the public body within the meaning of the relevant regulations, then the relevant legal test under UK sanctions regulations may be met. The guidance follows on from a notable decision of the UK Court of Appeal Mints & Ors v PJSC National Bank Trust & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 1132 which was handed down 6 October 2023. Please click here for our recent news item on the judgment. Please also see the recent UK High court case of 15 November 2023 Litasco SA Claimant, Der Mond Oil and Gas Africa SA and Locafrique Holding SA. There the High court judge appears to create a test that distinguishes between actually existing control and prospective control, stating his belief that the better interpretation of Regulation 7(4) is that it is concerned with an existing influence of a designated person over a relevant affair of the company …. not a state of affairs which a designated person is in a position to bring about. Were matters otherwise, it would follow that President Putin was arguably in control, for Regulation 7(4) purposes of companies of whose existence he was wholly ignorant, and whose affairs were conducted on a routine basis without any thought of him. Readers can also listen to a recent (20th Nov 2023) interesting webinar on the subject entitled “Webinar with UK government on sanctions ownership/control”. The webinar was hosted by UK firm Peters & Peters and the UK deputy director of sanctions David Drake and deputy director in OFSI Beth Davis spoke on the topic. Acknowledgement that any links to BAILII website (above) are free. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.    

The European Parliament has recently issued a report on EU sanctions implementation and monitoring. It includes recommendations to reinforce the EU’s capacities to implement and monitor sanctions. The think tank writes that the EU should agree on a joint definition of what constitutes a competent national authority, ensure adequate guidance for the EU’s economic operators, enhance the involvement of implementation and enforcement expertise in the planning phase of sanctions regimes, and design a new horizontal sanctions regime to counter circumvention. You can access the think tank summary and the report here.

A notable decision of the UK Court of Appeal Mints & Ors v PJSC National Bank Trust & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 1132 was handed down on 6 October 2023. The case concerns the UK Russian sanctions’ regime. There were three issues raised in the appeal and they are set out at paragraph 3 of the judgment. (The regulations referred to in the judgment are the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“Regulations”). The first issue raised was whether a judgment can lawfully be entered for a designated person by the English court following a trial at which it has been established that the designated person has a valid cause of action; The second is the circumstances whereby Treasury /OFSI can license certain payments; The third is whether a designated person controls an entity within the meaning of Regulation 7 where the entity is not a personal asset of the designated person, but the designated person is able to exert influence over it by virtue of the political office that he or she holds at the relevant time. (The control issue). The Court of Appeal found that as (1) the entry of  a money judgment in favour of a designated person was not prohibited by the UK sanctions regime and (2) the payments/litigation steps could be authorised by licence, the issue of control did not arise .However the judge said that as the control issue was fully argued and of some general  significance he would briefly address it .The remarks are therefore obiter dicta ,not a binding part of the decision and of persuasive authority only . The judge said  that the wording of Regulation 7 does not distinguish between different forms of “non-ownership control” or “calling the shots”. He concluded that control can be established under Regulation 7 by whatever means including political and corporate office. In any event the judge said that even though he would have found for the appellants on this issue, because they lost on the first two issues, the appeal must be dismissed. Following the decision the UK Foreign ,Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO)  issued a statement on the Mint decision saying that it was carefully considering its impact. It said that the FCDO would look to designate a public body where possible when designating a public official if FCDO considered that the relevant official was exercising control over the public body. It went on to say that there is no presumption on the part of the Government that a private entity based in or incorporated in Russia or any jurisdiction in which a public official is designated is in itself sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the relevant official exercises control over that entity. The statement helps to support the conclusion that the UK government did not intend for all Russian companies to be subject to sanctions restrictions by virtue of Mr Putin’s designation, but legislative clarity on this issue would be best to ensure certainty in this area. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority recently issued a publication on firms’ response to increased sanctions due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In the publication the FCA set out key findings from its assessments of sanctions systems and controls and includes examples of good practice and areas for improvement. While the publication is in respect of financial services firms, the findings in relation to good practices and areas that need improvement may be of interest in any efforts to making improvements to the approach to identifying and assessing the sanctions risks that firms are exposed to.

In September 2023 the EU Commission issued a guidance note for EU operators on implementing enhanced due diligence to shield against Russia sanctions circumvention. It is to help European operators to identify, assess, and understand the possible risks of Russian sanctions circumvention. It includes circumvention red flags related to business partners and customers that EU operators should watch for when they enter into a commercial relationship with a new trading partner . The EU Guidance note is in the same vein as the summary AML Alert  Russia sanctions – Trade sanctions circumvention  which was  produced by the Accountancy AML Supervisors’ Group (AASG) from an extract from the UK Department of Business and Trade notice NTE 2023/08: Russia sanctions – Trade sanctions circumvention published 22 May 2023  . Details of this notice were brought to members attention in a news item from Professional Standards Dept. of the Institute of August 23, 2023 where they alluded to awareness of the risk and obligations in relation to sanctioned goods as an important first step for those working in the accountancy profession so that they do not become party to the trade sanctions circumvention.

The latest, 11th EU sanctions package was implemented on 23 June 2023. Click here and here for the press releases from the EU Council. The package introduces further trade, transport and energy restrictions. It also lists  over 100 additional individuals and entities subject to asset freezes and other restrictions  such as extension of the media ban to 5 additional channels. Click here for a summary of the key elements. Click here to go to the European Commission website where readers can find further information on the eleventh package including Q&A on the package. The European Union External Action webpage has a booklet on their website summarising the provisions of the eleventh package which you can access here. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.  

In February 2023 the UK government updated its guidance on supplying professional and business services to a person connected with Russia. Readers will recall that during 2022 legislation was passed outlawing the direct or indirect provision of accounting services and audit services to a person connected with Russia. The guidance outlines the two exceptions to the ban on audit services and if an audit firm signed an audit engagement letter prior to 16 December 2022, the firm has until 31 May 2023 to complete the audit. However, the firm must notify the Secretary of State that they will be completing the work by 15 March 2023. While the guidance has a caveat that individual firms must take their own legal advice as to whether their activity falls within scope of the sanctions it also gives guidance on some common audit scenarios. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.  

On 23 February 2023 the Council of the European adopted its tenth package of sanctions against Russia. You can read more details on the tenth package on the European Commission website here a press release on the tenth package here and  Questions and Answers: tenth package of restrictive measures against Russia here.

In case readers missed our news item in our weekly Round Up last week ,we reported that the Irish Central Bank (CBI ) has  updated its sanctions webpage with an infographic and financial sanctions FAQs . We were locating a link for readers to EU guidance on ownership and control referenced in the FAQs. This is now linked below. The CBI FAQs includes a question on whether sanctions only apply to those on the sanctions lists? In the answer CBI says that where you identify that a sanctioned individual or entity owns or controls the individual/entity with whom you are transacting, you should fully assess the impact of this ownership or control. When conducting this assessment, you should refer to the EU Commission’s guidance on ownership and control. This guidance on ownership/control can be found in EU Best Practices which was updated in 2022. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages. Chartered Accountants Ireland can accept no responsibility for the content on any site that is linked to/from the Institute website. Links are provided in good faith for the potential support of members and students.  

Readers may be aware that the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) (Amendment) (No. 17) Regulations 2022 (the No. 17 Regulations ) were recently passed in the UK bringing into effect further prohibitions  from 16 December 2022 including a ban on auditing services which was announced in September 2022. “Auditing services “is defined and means services consisting of examination of the accounting records and other supporting evidence of an organisation for the purpose of expressing an opinion as to (a) whether financial statements of the organisation present fairly its position as at a given date, and (b) the results of its operations for the period ending on that date, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Readers should note that the No. 17 Regulations bring further changes into effect including a prohibition on the provision of trust services and they also contain certain exemptions from the prohibitions contained in the No.17 Regulations (see section 60DA(3) in relation to auditing services) . This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages. Chartered Accountants Ireland can accept no responsibility for the content on any site that is linked to/from the Institute website. Links are provided in good faith for the potential support of members and students.  

THE LEGISLATIVE PROHIBITION The Russia (Sanctions) (Eu Exit) (Amendment) (No. 14) Regulations 2022 (“No.14/2022 Regulations”) came into force on 21 July. An explanatory memorandum was issued with the No.14/2022 Regulations which the reader can access here . The No.14/2022 Regulations amend the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“2019 Regulations”) and provide for a ban on certain professional and business services. Under newly enacted section 54C a person must not directly or indirectly provide “accounting services” to a person connected with Russia. “accounting services” is defined in new section 54B and means accounting review services, which are services involving the review by a person of annual and interim financial statements and other accounting information, but excluding auditing services; compilation of financial statements services, which are services involving the compilation by a person of financial statements from information provided by a client, including preparation services of business tax returns when provided together with the preparation of financial statements for a single fee, but excluding such preparation services of business tax returns when provided as a separate service; other accounting services such as attestations, valuations, preparation services of pro forma statements; bookkeeping services, which are services consisting of classifying and recording business transactions in terms of money or some unit of measurement in the books of account, but excluding bookkeeping services related to tax returns; Readers can see that the definition scopes out certain services, auditing services is excluded from the prohibition under “accounting review services”, preparation services of business tax returns when provided as a separate service is excluded and so are bookkeeping services related to tax returns. Regulation 21(2) of the 2019 Regulations sets out what a person connected with Russia means. A person is to be regarded as “connected with” Russia if the person is— (a) an individual who is, or an association or combination of individuals who are, ordinarily resident in Russia, (b) an individual who is, or an association or combination of individuals who are, located in Russia, (c) a person, other than an individual, which is incorporated or constituted under the law of Russia, or (d) a person, other than an individual, which is domiciled in Russia. DEFENCES, EXCEPTIONS AND LICENCES New section 54C provides that it is a defence for a person to show that they did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the person to whom the services were provided was connected with Russia. New section 60DA provides certain exceptions to the ban. The prohibition is not contravened if the act is done: - to satisfy UK statutory or regulatory obligations (not arising under contract). - in respect of contractual obligations concluded before 20 July 2022 provided the act is done before the end of the period of one month beginning with the day on which the No 14/2022 Regulations came into force (21 July 2022) and that the person doing the act has notified the Secretary of State in the UK no later than the day 10 working days before the day on which the act is carried out. -out of necessity for the official purposes of a diplomatic mission or consular post in Russia or of an international organisation enjoying immunities in accordance with international law. Licensing provisions are contained in Part 7 of the 2019 Regulations. Please see Chartered Accountants Ireland  sanctions webpages for further information and links including paragraph  3.2 of updated government guidance  UK Government webpage on “Russia Sanctions: Guidance”. Please see here for a useful article on the sanctions by Stephenson Harwood LLP UK sanctions: professional and business services to Russian clients (shlegal.com) .The article includes  a comparison with the EU ban on provision of accounting services introduced in early June 2022 and about which see further Chartered Accountants Ireland recent news item . Readers attention is drawn to an update whereby  the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) (Amendment) (No. 17) Regulations 2022 (the No. 17 Regulations ) were  passed in the UK bringing into effect further prohibitions  from 16 December 2022 including a ban on auditing services which was announced in September 2022. “Auditing services “is defined and means services consisting of examination of the accounting records and other supporting evidence of an organisation for the purpose of expressing an opinion as to (a) whether financial statements of the organisation present fairly its position as at a given date, and (b) the results of its operations for the period ending on that date, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Readers should note that the No. 17 Regulations bring further changes into effect including a prohibition on the provision of trust services and they also contain certain exemptions from the prohibitions contained in the No.17 Regulations (see section 60DA(3) in relation to auditing services) . This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages. Chartered Accountants Ireland can accept no responsibility for the content on any site that is linked to/from the Institute website. Links are provided in good faith for the potential support of members and students.  

In the UK the National Economic Crime Centre (NECC) and others have this month issued a red alert on Financial Sanctions Evasion Typologies: Russian Elites and Enablers. The purpose of the alert is to provide information on some common techniques suspected to be used to evade financial sanctions.  It lists some indicators of methods being used to evade sanctions and provides some industry recommendations. Read also the NCA news item here.

The Irish Central Bank Director of Enforcement & Anti Money Laundering  has this week contacted business groups and professional representative bodies  including Chartered Accountants Ireland regarding financial sanctions obligations .You can read details of the press release here. The Central Bank  has asked for a letter they have written on sanctions to be circulated to members. The letter advises recipients that the Central Bank is the competent authority for the administration and enforcement of financial sanctions and that the adoption of sanctions places legally binding obligations on all individuals and entities. You can read the full contents of the letter here.

On 3 June 2022 the European Commission announced its sixth package of sanctions against Russia. Further details are now available  on the Institute’s webpage on Sanctions. One of the measures is that the provision directly or indirectly of certain business-relevant services such as accounting, auditing including statutory audit, bookkeeping and tax consulting services, business and management consulting, and public relations services to the Russian government, as well as to legal persons, entities or bodies established in Russia are now prohibited. The relevant legal acts, a Decision 2022/884 and a Regulation 2022/879 have been published in the Official Journal. The recitals to Regulation 2022/879 provide a little more detail of the services which fall within the sanctions. They state that “......accounting, auditing, bookkeeping and tax consultancy services cover the recording of commercial transactions for businesses and others; examination services of accounting records and financial statements; business tax planning and consulting; and the preparation of tax documents….” Exemptions to the EU sanction are provided. There is an exemption for provision of services that are strictly necessary for the termination by 5 July 2022 of contracts which are not compliant with the Article (i.e now prohibited by the sanction) which were concluded before 4 June 2022 or of ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such contracts. Exemption is also given for services that are strictly necessary for the exercise of the right of defence in judicial proceedings and the right to an effective legal remedy. An exemption is given for services for the exclusive use of entities established in Russia but owned, solely controlled, or jointly controlled, by an entity in an EU Member State. Derogations (which would have to be sought) are provided for services necessary for humanitarian purposes. The provisions are somewhat vague. For example, the wording on the applicable date is not entirely clear though it seems that the services are banned with a deadline for cessation of activities ,the provision of services that are strictly necessary, of 5 July 2022. Strictly necessary services are not defined either. On 24 June 2022 the EU Commission updated its FAQs to include an FAQ document on prohibition of certain business relevant services. You can click here to read the FAQs on sanctions on certain business relevant services. In the UK a ban on professional services exports to Russia was announced by the UK government  on May 4th.No further details have been publicly announced although we understand that legislation is being prepared on those sanctions. We will provide further information when available. Please see links below for some recent news items on this issue: European Commission press release on Sixth package of sanctions Arthur Cox, solicitors Linklaters Responses to the Russia/Ukraine Crisis – Sanctions Update No.3 Reed Smith This news item is provided as resources and information only and nothing in the news item  purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the news item. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of the news item we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in the news item. Chartered Accountants Ireland can accept no responsibility for the content on any site that is linked to/from the Institute website. Links are provided in good faith for the potential support of members and students.