Latest news

In his book The Closing of the Auditor’s Mind?, David J. O’Regan, FCA, examines how an erosion of trust in modern auditing might be remedied and reversed. Increasingly fragmented patterns of accountability and social trust are in the ascendant and there are implications for a crucial area of our socio-economic existence—internal auditing. Internal auditing faces not only a challenge of adaptability to emerging patterns of accountability and social trust, it is also confronted by broader challenges of reforms required to encourage such adaptability. One might prefer the term “crises” to “challenges” but let us avoid leavening our analysis with hyperbolic language. Nonetheless, the severity of internal auditing’s two contemporaneous and interconnected challenges discussed is not to be underestimated. Should the challenges remain unaddressed, they may well develop into profound crises. Regarding the first challenge of adaptability, internal auditing has failed to keep pace with global trends toward a flattening of traditional, vertical hierarchies of the command-and-control variety, and their replacement with complex patterns of horizontally distributed accountability and social trust. Our trust in traditional institutions and in politicians, business leaders and the cultural elite is eroding. We are increasingly placing trust in non-hierarchical networks, both digital and human. And where trust has been displaced, flows of accountability adapt accordingly. The emergent patterns of accountability and social trust are so far-reaching that they threaten to leave internal auditing marooned, like a shipwreck, in the detritus of history. Internal auditing is therefore at a crossroads, both practical and conceptual. The most demanding needs of accountability and social trust increasingly fall into three domains – in the inner workings of organisations; in transitional spaces at organisational boundaries; and in extra-mural activities. Internal auditing remains fixated on the innards of traditional, bureaucratic structures and is ill-positioned to address the assurance demands arising at both the liminal spaces at the fringes of formal organisational structures and from locations beyond institutional boundaries. The peripheral and external domains are characterised by an absence of clear markers of responsibilities, and by fast, flexible and disorienting flows of accountability that bear little resemblance to the shape of traditional bureaucracy. Their records of accountability are typically digital rather than tangible, and the significance of their assurance demands defies easy evaluation. Importantly for our analysis in this book, we encounter the new patterns of accountability and social trust where the writ of internal auditing, as well as external auditing, runs weakest. The versatility of both internal and external auditing is hampered by restraints. The external auditor’s opinion on an organisation’s annual financial statements once satisfied the assurance needs of traditional hierarchies of accountability and social trust, but it is ill-equipped to meet the demands of the emergent, horizontally distributed accountability paradigm. In contrast to external auditing, internal auditing’s activities are framed in more elastic terms, and internal auditing therefore offers, on paper at least, a greater scope for adaptation. Yet internal auditing, like external auditing, faces an uncertain future, owing to the need for the types of reform without which the necessary agility and adaptation are unlikely to develop. At this point, a word of caution is in order. Even amid the newly emerging patterns of horizontally distributed accountability, bureaucratic organisations characterised by command-and-control structures will continue to exist. A demand for external and internal auditors’ services will therefore remain, as long as stakeholders continue to be interested in financial statements and in the inner workings of organisations. But the real action on accountability and social trust will increasingly be found elsewhere on the fringes of organisations and in extra-mural locations. Already, assurance is becoming increasingly piecemeal. We can expect the emergence, in the near future, of innovative, diffuse assurance mechanisms to address the pressing demands of the new patterns of accountability and social trust. Both external and internal auditing therefore face a future of marginalisation as they remain shackled to the outdated frameworks of bureaucratic institutions. Internal auditing faces not only a challenge of adaptability. It also contends with a second challenge arising from its increasing tendency toward algorithmic and mechanistic activities. In particular, the dangers arising from a swelling tide of amoral and pedantic literalism in internal auditing are difficult to overstate. A humane approach to internal auditing founded on creativity, individual judgment, and critical thinking. In this context, there is a sense of loss that seems an inevitable accompaniment to progress. Or, perhaps more accurately, an accompaniment to misplaced notions of progress. Internal auditors today have at their disposal vast pools of data, along with powerful technological tools that mine and arrange the data into auditable information. Technological advances encourage internal auditors to approach well-worn topics in fresh ways and to explore newfangled activities. Only a Luddite would be hostile to technological advances in internal auditing, from data analytics to the use of drones for the purposes of aerial surveillance of dispersed inventory. But internal auditing’s technological achievements have come at a high cost – as an addictive substitute for critical thinking. Internal auditors are increasingly gripped by an algorithmic mindset, and they tend to look at technology, not as a means to an end, but as an end in itself. This technologically driven approach has crowded out arduously gained humane aspects of internal auditing. The relentless, metallic clatter of technological advance does not therefore necessarily imply improvements in understandings of underlying concepts. Our collective faith in data analytics and sampling software has created the seductive but dangerous myth that we are better auditors than our predecessors. We seem unaware that accretions of prowess in data handling and number-crunching often offer little more than illusions of certainty, if not groundless uncertainties. The technology of internal auditing may progress, but the cogency of the concepts and principles of internal auditing remain enduring. Diagnostic acumen, analytical rigor, inferential precision, a healthy scepticism, and a resistance to transient faddism are unchanging prerequisites for good internal auditing, and our progressive internal auditing environment now needs them more than ever. Modern internal auditing does not lack energy. However misplaced, its enthusiasm is in constant motion, exuding an exaggerated sense of industriousness. But the blustering, frenetic pace of internal auditing today masks an underlying intellectual inertia, a kind of hallucinatory lassitude in which highly agitated activity serves only to endow clockwork routines with decreasing significance. Beneath whirlwinds of risk assessments, data analytics, and trending buzzwords, and beyond the dubious recommendations that often flow from such mechanisms, we see process increasingly triumphant over substance. It is at internal auditing’s eerily muted core where the absence of timeless concepts of validity and truth are most keenly felt. A technocratic conformity is descending on internal auditing like a smothering shroud, leaving us with muffled reverberations of futile routines, hollow platitudes, and a steady decline in the public’s trust. Only a fundamental overhaul of internal auditing’s self-understanding and methodologies, driven by a tempering of its algorithmic mindset, will open the door to a return to a style of auditing marked by creativity and judgment. Without such an overhaul, internal auditing is unlikely to survive a take-over by automated auditing software and machine-processed artificial intelligence, let alone adapt to the evolving paradigm of accountability and social trust. About the author David J. O’Regan has authored nine books on auditing and related themes. A Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, he earned a doctorate in accounting and finance from the University of Liverpool and his auditing experience spans more than three decades, in the private, public and academic sectors. O’Regan joined the United Nations system in 2005, working initially at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons at The Hague in the Netherlands. He has served as Auditor General to the Pan American Health Organization in Washington D.C. since 2009. For more, see davidoregan.com.

Seamus Parle is leading the way at Rotary Ireland in his role as District Governor of the international organisation on Irish soil, writes Barry McCall. The move to semi-retirement in 2023 allowed Wicklow-based Seamus Parle to devote more time to his voluntary work with Rotary Ireland, ultimately taking on the role of District Governor of the all-island organisation in July 2024. For Parle, the role marks an important milestone in his professional endeavours, allowing him to apply skills learned over the course of a successful career for the betterment of society. “Rotary is dedicated to serving communities both here and abroad, and through its voluntary work, provides an excellent platform for people to develop socially and professionally,” he explains. “Rotary members are people with a social conscience who want to put their skills and expertise into the service of the community. “Whether it’s supporting a health or education project here in Ireland, providing housing for families in Ukraine or funding a water pump project in rural Kenya, Rotary has no shortage of projects for people to become involved in.” Professional career Parle’s professional career began in 1975 with Bank of Ireland. “There weren’t many jobs around at the time. When I left the bank four years later, people said I needed my head examined. But I was studying accountancy at the time, and it was difficult to get to classes in Dublin from Baltinglass, Co. Wicklow, where I was working,” he says. From Bank of Ireland, Parle moved to engineering company TMG Group as an Assistant Accountant. “It was in Wexford and even further away from my classes,” he recalls, “But I got practical hands-on experience of doing accounts and I then moved to Waterford Iron Foundry.” His next move saw him take up a role with Ballyfree Farms in Wicklow. “I qualified as a Management Accountant (CIMA) while I was there. The company was taken over a number of times, most recently by Kerry Group. If I wanted to progress my career, I had to be prepared to move to Tralee or even further afield. Our first child was on the way and that wasn’t for me.” This led to Parle’s move into practice. “I went to work for my friend Cathal Cooney at his practice. The plan was to stay for a year while looking for another role in industry. I was still there 33 years later—I never escaped,” he jokes. “After industry, I found the diversity of practice work very enjoyable. You are involved in totally different assignments from one day to the next. In industry, it’s pretty much the same every day. “After a few years, I realised I wouldn’t be able to sign audit reports as a Management Accountant, so I did the CPA exams to become a Certified Public Accountant. In 2023, we merged with a larger firm which allowed me to retire from the practice.” Parle’s involvement with Rotary dates back to his taking over from Cathal Cooney as Managing Partner of Cooney Parle & Co. Accountants (now GBW Cooney Parle & Co. Accountants) in 2012. “Cathal had always looked after business development while I stayed in the office. I had to step into his role and decided to do some networking, so I joined Rotary,” he explains. Parle became Wicklow Club President in 2014 and Assistant Governor with responsibility for eight clubs in 2016. “I became District Treasurer with responsibility for finance for Ireland in 2018 and, on 1 July 2024, became District Governor for the Rotary organisation on the island of Ireland for a one-year term.” Rotary history and development Rotary Ireland has 1,450 members while the international organisation has 1.2 million members at 35,000 clubs in over 200 countries worldwide. “Rotary was founded in 1905 as a business networking group by four people in Chicago,” Parle explains. “They decided that if each of them recommended each other to their contacts, all the businesses would grow as a result. If you want to recommend someone, you need to know that they will do a good job, so you need to know them quite well. “They met weekly in each other’s offices on a rotational basis, hence the name. The businesses prospered and after a few years, they decided to give back a proportion of those gains to the community.” The first beneficiary was the community in a town outside Chicago. The nearest doctor’s horse had died, depriving the town of access to the doctor. The Chicago Rotary Club solved the problem by buying a new horse for the doctor. The second project was the construction of a new public convenience in the city of Chicago. “Such facilities were quite novel at the time,” Parle says. The Irish connection goes back a long way. “The first Rotary Club outside North America was in Dublin. The ‘Dublin Number 1’ club was founded in 1911 and is still meeting today. That’s the origin story.” Rotary was founded for business and social networking and to provide an opportunity for people to perform community service and for their own self development in areas like project management, teamwork and leadership, Parle explains. “Involvement teaches members about work and life and gives them a different perspective on things. Members also have access to all 35,000 clubs around the world. I was in Brazil recently and had the privilege of visiting the Rotary Club of Copacabana.” Rotary club members are drawn from all walks of life, and each brings something to the table. Accountants can be particularly valuable, Parle points out. “Every club needs a Treasurer. In Rotary, you are dealing with other people’s money, whether that’s the members’ money or money raised through charity fundraising. Accountants have high ethical standards, are skilled at making the most effective use of scarce resources and are seen as a safe pair of hands.” Irish Rotary Club projects Irish Rotary Clubs have been involved in a range of projects in recent years. These include the annual Trees of Remembrance, a Christmas initiative hosted in many shopping centres around the country. “Just over half the clubs in Ireland are involved in that. People can write a note to remember a loved one who has passed on or is ill and can make a donation which usually goes to an end-of-life charity,” Parle explains. Another initiative has seen Rotary Clubs tackle waste at the same time as providing bicycles to schoolchildren in Africa. “A number of years ago, we got €250,000 from the Government’s anti-dumping initiative. We used that to put containers in recycling centres to allow people to dump unwanted bikes,” Parle says. “We bring them to Loughan House and Shelton Abbey open prisons for refurbishment where the prisoners acquire skills in bike maintenance. The bicycles are shipped to Gambia where students might live a two- or three-hour walk from their school. Having a bicycle leads to better educational outcomes for them.” Other projects involve road safety advisory sessions for transition year students in Ireland and the provision of microcredits to people starting businesses in the developing world. Parle also mentions a former winner of Rotary’s Youth Leadership Development Competition—Rotary honorary life member, former Taoiseach and current Tánaiste Simon Harris. “Simon learned a lot through his involvement in Rotary and it shows the benefits of becoming involved at a young age regardless of whichever party you support or are a member of,” he says. New members are always welcome. “New members from different backgrounds, with different perspectives, all are welcome, and we would really like to see more young people, particularly women, joining,” Parle says. “In Ireland, we have clubs throughout the country. People interested in joining can contact their Rotary Club through Rotary.ie. We have people waiting to respond to membership enquiries. They are all volunteers, we have no paid staff, no offices and no admin costs as such. “Through Rotary, I’ve learned so much and met so many wonderful people from all over the island of Ireland and beyond. Quite simply, joining Rotary was the best decision I made this century.”

In early 2025, before Donald Trump had even stepped foot inside the White House to begin his second time as US President, corporate America rushed to back out of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) promises made to consumers in 2016. Three members give us their take on the potential impact on DEI policies in the wider working world. John McNamara Executive Director and CFO, AIB life There has never been a more exciting time to be interested in diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). “Too woke! Too preachy! More masculine energy! Shut it down!” Regardless of the invective linked to its unexpected politicisation, what seemed to be an unquestioned progression in DEI awareness and acceptance has now been seriously disrupted. How we react will determine its evolution, and indeed existence, in the years ahead. “Never waste a crisis” is the truism, and this period of transition offers businesses the opportunity to double down, tread water or cease their DEI activities. At its core, DEI aims to tackle important issues, such as workplace gender equality and discrimination based on sexuality and racial biases, while also raising awareness of age, ability and access in a safe environment. Within organisations, this effort is supported by a culture that is visibly led from the top and engages those affected, along with their allies. Diverse teams produce better products resulting in higher profits, the latter being ironic in the context of much of the current US narrative. What DEI isn’t is tokenism. It isn’t about marking certain days of the year, while ignoring what they represent the rest of the time—participating in a Pride parade annually, for example, without putting in place supportive policies for LGBT+ people. The responsibility for DEI often gets passed to HR, where it withers away, remaining separate from the rest of the organisation. Lanyards and name badges are produced only to be tossed in (virtual) drawers, often in the absence of management leading by example. So, if all of that ceases now, then frankly, no loss. However, those businesses that stay the course have a valuable opportunity to reflect on how DEI sits within—and is communicated across—their organisation. In the short term, check in with your team to find out how they are feeling about current events, and to understand if they feel unsettled. Even small gestures build trust and inclusion. Less emphasis on targets, quotas, enforcement or policies may also be welcome—and more on ensuring that workplaces better represent the full diversity of the communities they employ, engage with and serve. The pendulum will swing again. Those businesses that re-commit to DEI now when challenged will arguably be more invested than ever before—and that’s a good thing. Sandra Quinn, Founder and CEO Quinn & Associates, Executive Search Partners For over 15 years as a recruiter and the previous 10 as a Chartered Accountant, I have seen how work shapes careers, identities and aspirations. Where we spend our nine-to-five matters. It influences our sense of purpose, opportunity and belonging. I have always been guided by two principles: A lesson from my father: “Love is an understanding of one another”; and A simple truth I share with my children: “If we were all the same, the world would be very boring.” These ideas highlight the value of difference, not just in theory but in the strengths diverse perspectives bring to the workplace. DEI initiatives have played a key role in fostering more inclusive environments. They have broadened access to opportunity, challenged outdated biases and helped organisations recognise talent in all its forms. Neurodiverse individuals, for example, bring fresh thinking and problem-solving skills yet, too often, face barriers unrelated to ability. Similarly, many disabled professionals are not limited by their own capabilities but by workplaces that fail to accommodate them. The real challenge is not whether people can contribute but whether workplaces create the conditions for them to do so. As some organisations scale back DEI efforts, an important question arises: what comes next? True inclusivity should not depend on a policy. It should be embedded in how we lead, hire and collaborate. Fairness, respect and opportunity must be more than corporate buzzwords. They should define workplace culture. Sustaining progress requires more than policies. It demands emotional intelligence, empathy and a willingness to challenge bias. The success of DEI will not be measured by whether programmes persist, but by whether their impact endures. Understanding and celebrating difference is not just the right thing to do; it is what makes workplaces stronger, teams more innovative and organisations more successful. Mark Fenton, CEO & Founder, MASF Consulting Ltd For years, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practice has shaped workplaces globally and enhanced performance by embracing diverse contributions and driving innovative decision-making. Recently, however, we have seen some high-profile corporations and educational institutions begin to dismantle their DEI initiatives. DEI is seen by some as non-essential, with initiatives viewed as a zero-sum game or unhelpful political correctness. So, are DEI programmes still important? The answer is yes. DEI programs are not just about fairness; they drive business success. Research consistently shows that diverse teams are more innovative, perform better financially and make better decisions. Inclusive workplaces lead to higher employee engagement, retention and job satisfaction. While Meta, Google and Amazon’s about-face on DEI has grabbed the headlines, there are many more organisations (Apple, Coca-Cola and Citigroup, for example) that have come out in favour of DEI and reaffirmed their strategic intent. Indeed, at the recent Davos summit, the CEOs of both JP Morgan Chase and Cisco delivered strongly supportive statements on the impact of DEI. Nonetheless, the DEI ‘industry’ is partly to blame for the current backlash in that some of the language it uses is viewed (ironically) as exclusionary, and some initiatives as favouring certain groups over others. This can hamstring diverse viewpoints, prioritising identity factors over merit and muddying the link between diverse perspectives and innovation and performance. Leaders need to: Engage the audience: Simplify the message of what DEI means for each individual and release the constraint of ‘mandatory training’. Refine, not reduce: Review language used and mitigate negative perceptions of DEI supporting unfair quotas and/or unwanted activism—do not, however, reduce efforts and continue to maintain progressive company values. Link to business: Ensure measurable outcomes and better integration into corporate strategies. Our world is evolving and the need for inclusive and equitable workplaces remains. Organisations that stay committed to DEI will not only gain a competitive edge in an increasingly diverse and dynamic marketplace but will also benefit society as a whole.

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions. Question I work in HR in a large organisation. We put great store in supporting managers to select the best talent with job descriptions, interviews, onboarding, managing probation and so on. We stress the importance of feedback and tackle any issues that arise during probation. We often hear that everything is fine. Then, when things go wrong, managers call on us to sort out issues that were known about during probation. We have tried to tackle the issue in many ways, but the problem continues. Answer It is tough to work in HR. HR straddles the challenging divide between ensuring compliance—managing systems, procedures and policies to meet legal and organisational standards—and curating the culture that enables leaders to create an engaging, inclusive and high-performing environment. This dual responsibility requires HR to act as both the guardians of organisational integrity and the architects of a thriving workplace culture. Under pressure, compliance almost always wins. The question you have shared is very common, and there are several issues at play. First, the need to urgently ‘fill a gap’ caused by an impending departure or increased workload may take precedence over finding the right fit. Second, managers often wish to emphasise the positive and worry that developmental feedback will demotivate their team. They might not have established, whether at the interview or during induction, that sharing feedback is a normal practice. Under pressure, they may hesitate, hint or hope that instances of poor performance do not reoccur. Third, managers often lack the language to address subtle issues, such as high performance paired with poor behaviour (or vice versa), and they fear they do not possess sufficient ‘evidence’ to support any concerns they have. The plethora of policies, procedures and laws surrounding these issues can be daunting. Most importantly, managers often believe they are accountable for their team’s performance and that underperformance reflects poorly on them. This perception often drives them, leading them to overlook or conceal issues, even rejecting offers of assistance. HR can help managers realise that nobody can ‘own’ the performance of another person—people own their own performance. However, the manager owns the responsibility for setting appropriate goals, creating the right environment, sharing positive and developmental feedback and running great meetings. HR should assist managers in introducing the topic of feedback during both the interview and induction. This creates an expectation in the new hire that they will receive feedback, making it easier for the manager to access this space. My advice to you is to maintain close communication with managers during probation and avoid depending solely on the probation forms/procedure. Engage with managers about their new hires and reflect on the interview: Are the promised skills evident? What positive feedback has the manager provided to the new hire? What developmental areas are being worked on? Is the new hire the right fit? It may be smart for the senior manager to conduct this process with the hiring manager, as it predominantly concerns the organisational culture, which should be championed by senior leadership. Encouraging senior leadership to fulfil their ongoing role as shapers of organisational culture can be a challenge for HR, requiring consistent advocacy, a clear vision and deep commitment to the cause. If you read one thing... Flourishing: How to achieve a deeper sense of well-being, meaning and purpose—even when facing adversity by Dr Maureen Gaffney. This book helps individuals to build confidence and self-awareness, which is very helpful for leaders. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant with Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie.

Mentorship is key for young accountants transitioning to business development, offering guidance on effective networking, client engagement and relationship-building, says Mary Cloonan The challenge can feel significant for young accountants stepping into roles with business development targets for the first time. New responsibilities, particularly those requiring skills like networking and relationship-building, are often far removed from their previous technical focus. This is where mentorship can help, providing guidance and support to help them grow into the demands of their new role. Business development requires more than technical expertise. It involves cultivating relationships, strategic thinking and communicating value—skills not typically part of an accountant’s formal training. A mentor can: Provide practical guidance: Teach the mentee how to approach client engagement, network effectively and communicate persuasively. Build confidence: Support them as they tackle new challenges and unfamiliar scenarios. Set the example: Offer insights through real-world experiences and professional behaviour. Align efforts with strategy: Help them understand how their contributions support the firm’s broader goals. Effective mentoring: seven steps Here are seven steps experienced accountants can take to be a good mentor. 1. Simplify the starting point Break down business development into manageable steps. Help your mentee see this as relationship-building exercise rather than purely sales-focused. Concentrate on: Recognising potential opportunities in their network. Understanding the firm’s unique value proposition. Developing a genuine interest in client needs. 2. Set measurable goals Define clear and realistic targets. For example: Attend one networking event per month. Schedule two introductory meetings with prospective clients. Contribute to a team pitch or proposal. These bite-sized goals can help to build momentum without overwhelming them. 3. Practice through role-play Simulated scenarios are invaluable for building confidence. “Practice” situations with your mentee, such as: Introducing themselves at events. Explaining the firm’s services to a potential client. Handling objections effectively. Role-playing in a safe environment can help to prepare them for real-world challenges. 4. Encourage observation Let your mentee shadow experienced professionals. Whether it’s a client meeting, negotiation or event, watching mentors in action is a powerful learning tool. Follow up with discussions to reinforce key takeaways. 5. Emphasise listening Strong business development is rooted in active listening. Encourage them to: Ask open-ended questions. Pay close attention to what clients are really saying. Build trust by understanding challenges from the client’s perspective. 6. Give constructive feedback Feedback is essential. Review your mentee’s performance after meetings or pitches— highlight strengths and suggest improvements. Recognising small wins can boost confidence and foster growth. 7. Highlight the bigger picture Help your mentee to connect their efforts with your firm’s success. Discuss how building relationships can drive growth, create opportunities for cross-selling and enhance career prospects. Benefits for both mentors and mentees An effective mentorship programme benefits everyone. Firms gain future leaders with technical and business development skills, while clients will likely experience better service through improved relationship management. For young accountants, developing these skills early can boost their confidence and open up potential avenues to career advancement. Mary Cloonan is Founder of Marketing Clever

Amid political pushback and regional divides, investment in ESG remains a long-term bet driven by sustainability, transparency and innovation, writes Dan Byrne Publicly, the battle over Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) principles is heating up, and 2025 will be a make-or-break year. US President Donald Trump’s 2024 victory, buoyed by agendas dedicated to combatting so-called “woke capitalism”, has thrown a wrench into the ESG movement in the United States. But while some parts of the world are doubling down on anti-ESG sentiment, others—like Europe and Asia—are charging ahead with ambitious sustainability plans, so far unfazed by angry rhetoric elsewhere.  The conundrum surrounding ESG is that, for many people, it is all about politics. Much of the media will reinforce this viewpoint because it provides the juiciest angle, filled with conflict and the makings of a good story.  ESG goes much deeper than politics, however. The real decisions are made at quieter levels, where investment patterns continue and corporate strategies align with investor priorities. Although it may not be as juicy, this is the main factor fuelling success or failure in ESG.  ESG investing in 2025 When it comes to investing, there is one main conclusion: ESG isn’t going anywhere.  You may have read many news articles—particularly over the last 18 months—discussing divestment from ESG assets and the dwindling popularity of ESG among stakeholders. These stories are true, signalling that ESG is taking a beating in some quarters. If we zoom out, however, the numbers tell a different story.  As of late 2024, the global value of ESG assets is still expected to hit somewhere between $35 and $50 trillion by 2030, according to University of Chicago lecturer and Impact Engine Chief Investment Officer Priya Parrish, writing for Fortune last October.  In other words, the recent setbacks for ESG investment are small backflows, but the much more significant wave of overall ESG investment still exists.  Why the continuing surge? Investors are likely convinced that ESG-related investments are smart, long-term bets. Many of today’s ESG pillars involve adaptation, essential in governance thinking and good news for investors who always want clarity on how a company will succeed in five, ten or twenty years.  Even as critics argue that ESG is overhyped, woke or restrictive, a colossal chunk of capital remains, especially in Europe and Asia, where ESG investments are firmly entrenched.  Investors in the US will be much more cautious about ESG under Donal Trump’s presidency, but again, this is on the public political side, which we’ll explain more about below. ESG and politics The other firm conclusion is that the debate over ESG will not simmer down soon. Trump’s return to power in the US means that everything related to ESG will face even more backlash and legal headaches. These can range from limiting ESG considerations in federal contracts to questioning corporate motivations. The critics are loud and emboldened, and they will motivate anti-ESG movements elsewhere.  Will they succeed? It’s very iffy.  You might have heard that the bulk of the world’s population went to the polls in 2024, including the UK, India and the European Union (EU)—as a whole and within certain member states such as France. New governments with fresh mandates now exist in these places. Many will remain until about 2030, and most remain committed to ESG-related principles in some form.  The EU is doubling down, rolling out regulations such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) that demand greater transparency and accountability than ever before. In Asia, governments are leaning into sustainability to future-proof their economies.  The result? A fragmented world in which ESG is thriving in some places and under siege in others. Five main expectations So, are we likely to see governance professionals making key strategic decisions regarding ESG? Unfortunately, there is no clear answer here because each company’s ESG strategy depends on factors including its goals, industry and national stakeholder mood. However, we can make a few more general predictions right now: Regional divides will deepen. Europe and Asia remain ambitious about ESG and new regulations are coming into force. Meanwhile, the US and some emerging markets are grappling with political resistance. Expect the gap between these regions to widen, which is bad news for the boards of trans-Atlantic companies. Suddenly, they must ensure their business pleases two very different political regimes.  Transparency will require upskilling. Many companies, particularly in Europe and Asia, will realise the need for new expertise on boards and executive teams. This is the only way they can hope to comply with the new reporting regulations they face. Because of this, ESG-related training will become more crucial.  Tech will lead the charge. Artificial intelligence and blockchain are set to revolutionise ESG reporting. Think real-time monitoring of supply chains and automated sustainability audits. The future is digital because digital can make massive tasks more manageable, enabling companies to report with great depth and confidence.  “Hushing” will be the new ESG language in the US. How does a company pursue ESG investment without angering its anti-ESG government? The answer is hushing, which means being quiet on a particular issue, no matter how devoted you are, for fear that being public will attract too much unnecessary criticism. Corporate activism will rise: Whether or not companies and politicians like it, the most polarised attitudes around ESG will mean more activism among investors. Boards must be prepared for this because aggressive activism can sometimes threaten their entire agenda. The story of ESG is being rewritten in real-time. The loud political pushback in the media starkly contrasts with the continuing investment in sustainability, accountability and transparency.  Navigating all this is a considerable challenge for businesses, but there is also an opportunity for those who adapt quickly, embrace innovation and stay ahead of evolving regulations. Dan Byrne is Content Manager at The Corporate Governance Institute