Chartered Accountants considering a career abroad can benefit from a number of mutual reciprocity agreements with fellow Institutes worldwide. Chartered Accountants Ireland, through the Common Content Project (CCP), has been working with leading European Institutes to develop a new education benchmark for professional accountants that is fully EU and IFAC compliant and which supports auditor mobility within the EU. Following the agreement of the new benchmark, the Institute’s own education and assessment processes were assessed, confirming compliance with the CCP requirements. If you are a registered auditor in Ireland, you can gain audit rights (and depending on the country, membership rights) through the passing of a local law and tax examination. Further details are available about the project at www.commoncontent.com.   Other agreements include: Access to membership Chartered Accountants Ireland has mutual reciprocity agreements (MRAs) with a number of other leading global Institutes, which allow Chartered Accountants Ireland members to apply for membership of those bodies and allow members of those Institutes to apply to Chartered Accountants Ireland for membership. Applicants to Chartered Accountants Ireland will usually have access to membership without examination. To do so, you will need to contact the relevant reciprocal body and provide evidence of good standing and pay the requisite fee. Retention of membership is a requirement of this process. Practice rights Access to practice rights is not automatic and will normally require the passing of local company law and taxation (or similar) exams. Should you wish to gain practice rights, it is suggested that you should preferably gain rights in Ireland before seeking rights overseas. In those jurisdictions where practice rights and membership are synonymous, an examination must be passed. Audit rights are not automatically covered by these agreements as there can be specific local requirements in some cases.  Irish Chartered Accountants who are planning on gaining audit practice rights should gain Irish audit rights first before leaving home.   Chartered Accountants Ireland has MRAs with the following Institutes: The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)/National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA). This agreement provides access to membership, practice rights and audit rights subject to members meeting the specific entry criteria and the passing of the IQEX examination. NASBA administers the IQEX and issues the AICPA license; Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ, formerly the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia and the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants); Chartered Professional Accountants Canada (CPA Canada, formerly the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants); The Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA); The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS). No examination is required to gain practice rights); The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW). No examination is required to gain practice rights; The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Zimbabwe (ICAZ); The Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (ISCA); and The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA). For more information, contact Paula Dreelan on +353 1 637 7216 or email registry@charteredaccountants.ie. For any technical queries, contact Ronan O’Loughlin, Director of Education and Training at ronan.oloughlin@charteredaccountants.ie or 01 637 7329. You can read more about living and working overseas in Chartered Accountants Abroad, the publication from Accountancy Ireland for Chartered Accountants Ireland members abroad.

Blockchain represents both an end and a beginning for the accountancy profession. By Fearghal McHugh and Dr Trevor Clohessy Transparency can be considered the holy grail of governance best practice. The codes, acts and markets demand it as it enhances the view of corporate transactions, which has in turn affected issues such as environmental and sustainability reporting. Transparency is the core of blockchain, which will affect accountancy while satisfying this core principle and driver of good corporate governance. The difference is that it will not take the blockchain elements outlined below as long to become mainstream as it has taken to impact on environment and sustainability concerns. The consensus is that blockchain and its technologies will change the people skills, the processes, the systems and the structure of accounting practice currently applied to any transactions involved in the recording of any information. This has big implications for those in the sector but, significantly, gives a market opportunity to those who are not. Indeed, this opportunity is further enhanced when artificial intelligence integrates with blockchain. Scale of disruption The potential disruption is on the same scale as Amazon, which competes with all retail shops in the country. The first to market with the ‘Accountazon’ brand, named here first, will dent the current position of large or small practices. Accountazon requires accountants, but the ability to scale, integrate and generate output based on fully transparent and rules-based decision-making at the lower level of processing while, at the upper level, having the decision-making and knowledge base of a collective of highly-paid accountants will affect the accounting industry. This can drive the accounting industry to build on specialisation and value proposition offerings at a higher level than those currently generating income. In other words, intelligent computer systems will do what accountants currently do. The impact will force the industry to seek a new place away from rudimentary transaction-type roles of fundamental audit and tax processes. This will require in-depth knowledge (which artificial intelligence can replace) to pure decision-making; in essence, the better the decision-making, the higher one’s revenue and reputation. The purpose and role of accountants will remain, but will be implemented at a higher knowledge application and analysis level and further away from the current operations position and perspective. A personal approach There is no need for panic yet. As with Amazon, retail shops have continued in business but the pricing, delivery, support, convenience and speed we enjoy from the online retailer may also need to be addressed in the accountancy industry; we need to make accountancy accessible, friendly, convenient, productive and transparent. Either the market or the technology will drive the change, or the accountancy industry will embrace it first and deliver value. A Ryanair approach, encouraging a more direct business model using technology, could be applied in the accountancy industry and is more likely now with blockchain and artificial intelligence. The middleman remains the accountant, however, and if it is deemed that a lot of processes don’t add value, the middleman needs to present a value proposition that cannot be offered by the system itself in order to add future value. In the Ryanair model context, so many travel agents adjusted and seem to have found that personal service, customisation and the time taken to provide a tailored travel package for customers is what many consumers want. The drive for digitisation An example of a driver of this type of change arose earlier this year when the then-head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, urged central banks to launch digital currencies to satisfy public policy, financial inclusion, security, consumer protection and privacy in payments. While blockchain is mostly linked with cryptocurrencies, digitisation policies embraced by companies like Nestlé, Guinness and Glanbia are being encouraged by stakeholders but embraced in a controlled manner. Blockchain technology is part of the cryptocurrency system that actually worked. It is becoming embedded in many industries from manufacturing to web-based services, facilitating faster and more secure transactions on a growing scale. When companies and consumers have a better, easier, faster and more transparent way to do business, they will select it as time is a critical factor in corporate life. The practical elements and approaches to blockchain, as highlighted below, will be seen by clients as having the potential to reduce charges and the time involved in accountant reviews and advice, which Revenue could see as a means of speeding up returns. Public versus private Blockchain is not a mobile application, a company or a cryptocurrency. In its simplest terms, blockchain is a ledger that records transactions digitally and records details about the transaction. These details are recorded in multiple places on the same network. Blockchain comes in two flavours: public and private. A public blockchain allows anybody on the network to input transactions and data onto the blockchain. No single entity controls the network. A public blockchain operates like Wikipedia in that users have a composite view that’s constantly changing. Bitcoin, the tradename used to represent the familiar digital currency along with another called Ethereum are examples of public blockchains. Private blockchains work in a similar fashion to public blockchains, but with access restrictions that control who has access to the network. One or multiple entities control the network. Think of this in terms of a traditional database system that can only be accessed by specific authorised employees. Two features differentiate blockchain digital ledgers from traditional ledgers. First, the assets and transactions recorded in these digital ledgers are secured through cryptography. As an example, in season four of the Netflix drama, Narcos, Guillermo Pallomari’s financial ledgers records are taken as evidence by the Drug Enforcement Authority (DEA). However, due to the complicated coding system deployed by Pallomari within these financial ledgers, the DEA is unable to decipher the transactions and/or assets in order to use them as evidence. Pallomari holds the encryption key, which would enable the DEA to crack the code. In terms of blockchain, this also holds true. Due to sophisticated encryption keys, the transactions and assets are secure, immutable and unforgeable. Second, blockchain encompasses the disintermediation of traditional financial intermediaries (e.g. banks, brokerages, mutual funds). This disintermediation is made possible by smart contracts, which are complex algorithms that execute the terms and conditions of a traditional contract without the need for human intervention. This leads to a superior ability to prove custodianship and ownership of assets, which could potentially improve efficiency and enhance transparency while also reducing costs and income in the accountancy profession. Complexity and novelty Today, a number of multinational technology organisations enable businesses to implement blockchain practically. For instance, Microsoft currently offers a blockchain development solution that combines the advantages of cloud computing (e.g. virtualisation, scalability, pay-as-you-go pricing model) and blockchain. This service is called Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) and comes with a set of development templates (e.g. smart contract development and integration) that users can deploy and configure with minimal blockchain knowledge. However, prior to diving into the blockchain sea, accountancy organisations should adopt a caveat emptor mantra. History suggests that two dimensions impact on how a new technological trend and its business use can evolve. The first is complexity, which is represented by the level of coordination required by the organisation to produce value with the new technology. The second dimension is novelty, which describes the level of effort a user requires to understand the problems that the new technological trend can solve. The more novel a concept is, the greater the learning curve. Accountancy organisations can develop adoption strategies that map possible blockchain implementations against these two dimensions. Complexity and novelty can vary from low to high in terms of the stage of technology development. For instance, accountancy organisations that are new to the blockchain concept may want to introduce a pilot initiative that is low in novelty and low in complexity. One such initiative could encompass the inclusion of cryptocurrency transactions in a firm’s transactions processes. New skills While blockchain is spread across many systems, it is not public. It protects transactions because they are shared and copied on many parts of storage devices, and would require all parts and copies of the transaction to be amended and/or deleted to have an effect. Deleting a transaction in one place is easy, deleting it from several locations and tracking each one – while not impossible – would require some work. This capability could potentially scare some in that transactions cannot suddenly be erased, but it is encouraging for others. Apply this concept first to the level of payments and receipts and build that up to management reporting, budgets and strategic reports to ensure a higher level of accuracy and clarity. This will eventually lead to a sense of integrity, another governance ideal. With reference to speed, this can move business from reliance on past information to live analysis and if it’s faster, it will be cheaper in the long-run to produce. While a positive for business, it will not require the skill of a finance professional but a computing-finance professional. In a 2018 Irish industry report, one of the authors, Trevor Clohessy, identified that IT/education providers must do more to demystify blockchain and expedite the learning process. The report outlined how the core competencies and skills required for blockchain are broader than the core technology and encompassed skill sets, which fall under the following categories: Foundational technology (e.g. cryptography, public key architecture); Distributed ledger technology (e.g. mining, consensus algorithms); Forensics and law enforcement (e.g. money laundering, dark-net); Markets, economics and finance (e.g. business modelling, cryptonomics); Industrial design (e.g. supply chain, Internet of Things); and Regulations and standards (e.g. smart contracts, governance frameworks). From an accountancy perspective, it is envisaged that certain traditional skills relating to accountancy will be eliminated or reduced (such as reconciliations or provenance assurance, for example). Blockchain transactions will enable new value-adding activities but while the range of extant skills required will change, this change need not be Byzantine. It is envisaged that the markets and regulations categories outlined above will be important for bridging the blockchain literacy gap between various business and technology stakeholders. Looking ahead, accountancy practices can examine their business models in order to derive value from blockchain. Janus, the Roman god, contained both beginnings and endings within him. That duality characterises blockchain too. It will put an end to traditional ways of doing things and usher in a new era for business and for the world at large. It will be divisive, pervasive and transformational all at the same time, and will encourage accountancy professionals to look ahead and not base their operations and decision-making on past data. The blockchain future is one with present and predictive transacting data systems with in-built transparency and integrity.   Fearghal McHugh is a lecturer in Chartered Accountants Ireland and GMIT. Dr Trevor Clohessy is a researcher and lecturer in GMIT.

Unconscious bias isn’t going away – and neither is the pressure for diverse and inclusive workplaces, writes Dr Annette Clancy. Companies are under increasing pressure to improve gender equality, level the pay gap and generally change their approach to workplace inclusion. Part of this demand stems from equality legislation, but there is also growing public pressure to act. However, research tells us that we prefer to be in the company of people who are similar to us. We assume that we will have more in common, that we will be understood and liked, and that there will be minimal conflict. Of course, most of these assumptions are in the realm of fantasy – we all know people who are very similar to us but with whom we have fractious relationships. We also assume that the opposite will be true when it comes to people who are dissimilar to us. Consider, for example, the many stories in the US media of white people calling the police to complain about black people going about their business in their neighbourhoods. Head over heels? Freud went one step further and told us that the relationship between leaders and followers was like the act of falling in love or the state of trance between hypnotist and subject. What Freud was getting at was that we are unconsciously predisposed (in our personal and work lives) to choose people with whom we have a strong emotional attachment. At first glance, none of that makes for very good practice when it comes to increasing diversity, improving recruitment practices or searching for a new job. Hiring the most qualified candidate based on their CV and how they interview for a position seems straightforward enough, but it isn’t just what’s written down or their skills that will always convince the panel to appoint a candidate. Biases based on gender, race and other factors can present unconsciously and influence the decision, even when the panel has the best of intentions. Quick judgements Unconscious bias refers to a bias that we are unaware of and is out of our control. Our brain makes quick judgements about people and situations, and our culture, experiences and background influence these judgements. Everyone has unconscious bias and although training can increase awareness, research suggests that it has a limited effect on behaviour. One of the reasons why training is limited in its effectiveness is because the bias is ‘unconscious’. One afternoon’s worth of instruction is not going to eradicate a lifetime and a society-worth of unconscious programming. What has shown some promise is holding managers, teams and companies to account for the decisions they take. Other strategies include regular discussions on bias, making it an ordinary reflection point and not a ‘once-off’ conversation that is forgotten as soon as it happens. A good starting point for discussion is Harvard’s Project Implicit Tests, which will give you immediate feedback on your biases towards a wide range of issues. Mitigating bias Biases can affect your expectations of different groups. In hiring processes, it’s important to ask if you hold male, female or non-binary candidates to different standards. Assessing candidates ‘blind’ by concealing their name, for example, is another way in which organisations can mitigate bias. Likewise, as a jobseeker, do you have biases towards particular companies that are out of your conscious awareness and may be hindering your search? Biases can also affect how you manage your staff and may be a contributory factor as to why you retain or lose staff. Do you, for example, welcome challenges to your management style? Is it possible that you harbour different expectations of male and female staff members? How open are you to questioning your own unconscious bias? Unconscious bias isn’t going away, and neither is the pressure for diverse and inclusive workplaces. Bringing both of these topics right into the mainstream might be the first step towards having the conversation.   Dr Annette Clancy is Assistant Professor at UCD School of Art, History and Cultural Policy. Annette’s research focuses on emotions in organisations.

Sharon Cunningham ACA decided to co-found Shorla Pharma as an answer to her need to do something meaningful. Now, this women-led company is working towards bringing oncology therapies to global markets. Name: Sharon Cunningham Age: 34 Title: Co-founder, Shorla Pharma From: Waterford Hobbies: Running, gym, fashion and reading Favourite quote: ‘If you’re offered a seat on a rocket ship, don’t ask what seat! Just get on.’ - Sheryl Sandberg Why did you decide to become an entrepreneur? I found myself inspired and fascinated by other entrepreneurial journeys, particularly since joining  an early-stage pharmaceutical company post-training. I was motivated to do something meaningful and purposeful; to have a wider impact and create positive change, and I’ve always had an appetite for risk. I did an MBA at UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School and, upon graduating in 2015, a colleague and I began planning Shorla Pharma. We now have a pipeline of oncology products for global markets that deliver a major contribution to patient care and, ultimately, enhance patient outcomes.  Describe your typical day. There is no such thing as a ‘typical day’ for me anymore, and that is one of the aspects that I enjoy the most. My work is extremely varied. If I’m in the office, I can be working on anything from business development to product development to financial modelling. I’m in Dublin at least one day a week for conferences and meetings, and I travel frequently, particularly to the US to engage and interact with key opinion leaders, clinicians and the US Health Authority given that the US is a major market for Shorla Pharma.   What do you find most challenging? The business is progressing rapidly and it’s increasingly difficult to find time to reflect. Due to the fast pace, decisions need to be made quickly and change must be embraced regularly. I often take guidance from my intuition now, and that’s a big change given my analytical background. As a business owner, what traits do you value most? When selecting a consultant, employee or service provider to work with, I look for enthusiastic individuals who can demonstrate a desire to succeed – preferably with a proven track record. Organisational fit is essential; all the smarts in the world won’t make up for a personality that doesn’t fit the existing dynamic. Most importantly, I look for common sense – people who are pragmatic and possess a ‘can-do’ attitude. What is your best piece of business advice? Don’t overlook the basic fundamentals that a company needs to function. Create agile business systems, cover your legal and taxation bases, and pay close attention to the numbers. Above all, don’t forget to enjoy the journey and remember, there are rarely traffic jams on that extra mile.

When in a professional crisis, it’s difficult to see the wood through the trees. Resolving this inflection point as a business leader can take a different set of skills not yet in your arsenal, explains Brian Fowler. An inflection point is a period when an organisation must respond to disruptive change in the business environment effectively or face deterioration but, in practice, it’s a rare but decisive moment that marks the start of significant change – often in crisis. These moments not only affect organisations and industries, but they also impact on careers, too. At an inflection point, we are in a situation where the expectations placed upon us have so fundamentally altered because of the changes in the profession or working environment that if we don’t adapt, ourselves or the business will fail. When managing senior appointments, I am in contact with executives facing career challenges every day. The different types of situation are so vast that I couldn’t outline them easily, but pending redundancy after being a part of an organisation’s long-term senior leadership team or an executive transitioning from the safe zone of their current position to a different organisational role are not uncommon. If it’s a job move, many recruiters will introduce you to great opportunities.  However, it’s important to remember that a recruitment consultant’s primary task is source a candidate for a particular job and requirement for their client. If you are at a career inflection point, not only do you need a job, but you need proper career advice.  Who can help? There is a saying “That for every will, there is a relative!” and, in business, for every problem, there is an advisor, both competent and incompetent. It’s human nature to start the discussion with people within your network, whom you feel could be a good advisor. Your family and friends know you, but do they understand your business strengths and achievements, and how you have coped and tackled challenges?  Soundboarding with your peers seems intuitive but is often detrimental. Similarly, there are brilliant people in academia, but they may not have been at the coal face of business. It would be best to talk to executives who have a successful business track record, and whose only objective is to support and advise you.  Finding the answers When a professional hits a career inflection point, feeling inadequate is not uncommon. As a business leader, you may find that the skills and training that have brought you to this point in your career may be insufficient to bring you into the next development phase. The approach you will want to take may be a continuation of how you have resolved usual day-to-day business issues in the past, but you must remember that you are at an inflection point, and possibly heading into unchartered territory. Professional support and guidance will pay dividends.  Working with an executive coach can be an eye-opening experience. Great coaches are masters at asking questions that help them understand exactly what you are grappling with, but more importantly, they will help you view your situation through a new lens. Coaches don’t have the answers, but their questions can guide towards the answer that will best suit you.  People experiencing a dramatic change, in work or life, tend to keep asking themselves the same questions over and over. These questions are within their comfort zone, but the inflection point problem needs a different approach. The executive needs to start asking a different set of questions to come up with a plan to resolve the situation. An executive coach is the person who can teach you what questions to ask. Interacting with a coach should not only help you develop tactics to overcome today’s issues but help you gain skills to overcome future challenges. You will need to come up with better answers when facing professional challenges, and those answers will come more easily if better questions inspire you.  Brian Fowler is the Founder and Managing Director of financial recruitment specialists, Accountancy Solutions.

David Duffy highlights the latest VAT cases and discusses recent VAT developments. Two-tier VAT registration In eBrief 114/19, Revenue announced the introduction of a “two-tier” VAT registration process which took effect from 15 June 2019. The purpose of this change is to help speed up VAT registration applications for most businesses while also protecting against fraudulent traders obtaining VAT numbers that would allow them to buy-in goods or services from abroad VAT-free. Under the new system, applicants must specify whether they are applying for a ‘domestic-only’ or ‘intra-EU’ VAT registration number. Businesses that trade in goods or services with counterparties in other EU member states should apply for intra-EU registration. Other businesses should apply for domestic-only status. It is our understanding that domestic-only and intra-EU numbers will follow the same format. However, only intra-EU numbers will be valid on the EU’s VAT Information Exchange System (VIES) website. The VIES website is intended to allow suppliers to validate their customers’ VAT numbers for the purpose of intra-EU trade. Domestic-only VAT registration numbers will not be valid on the VIES website. For new applicants to obtain an ‘intra-EU’ VAT registration, additional information will be required, including details of due diligence undertaken to establish whether their suppliers are genuine traders and the arrangements for the cross-border transport of goods (if applicable). Less information will be required for domestic-only applicants, but these applicants may at a later time apply for intra-EU status, at which time they will be required to provide additional information on their intra-EU activities. All VAT registrations in effect prior to the introduction of the two-tier system will be automatically treated as having intra-EU status and there is no requirement to contact Revenue in this regard. Further changes are expected to be introduced in September 2019 to accelerate the processing times of VAT registration applications. EU VAT updates Recovery of VAT incorrectly charged In the case of PORR Építési Kft (C-691/17), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that the Hungarian tax authorities were entitled to disallow a claim by the taxpayer, PORR, in respect of VAT incorrectly charged to PORR by the supplier of motorway construction services. This was on the basis that PORR should instead have self-accounted for VAT under the reverse charge procedure. The CJEU confirmed that in such circumstances, the customer must pursue the supplier for a reimbursement of the VAT incorrectly charged in the first instance. It is only if reimbursement from the supplier is impossible or excessively difficult (e.g. if the supplier is insolvent) that the customer can address their application to the relevant tax authority. However, the CJEU confirmed that the tax authority is not required to ascertain whether the relevant supplier can adjust the VAT before rejecting a claim by the customer for a deduction of VAT incorrectly charged. This case highlights the importance of adopting the correct VAT accounting mechanism in order to claim recovery of the VAT arising on the supply. VAT bad debt relief In A-PACK CZ case (C-127/18), the CJEU held that a tax authority cannot deny a supplier’s claim for a VAT adjustment on bad debts, simply as a result of the debtor ceasing to be VAT registered. The VAT legislation in the Czech Republic appears to have included a condition that a VAT bad debt adjustment could not be made in these circumstances. In addition to confirming that this condition was incompatible with EU VAT law, the CJEU went on to say that the fact that the customer is no longer VAT registered because of insolvency proceedings is, in fact, supportive of the position that it is a bad debt and that the supplier should, therefore, be entitled to an adjustment for the VAT previously remitted on those supplies. There is no equivalent condition in Irish VAT law, but confirming the principle of an entitlement to claim VAT bad debt relief when it is clear that the debt will almost certainly not be collected is helpful. VAT exemption for granting of credit Vega International Car Transport and Logistic (C-235/18) was an Austrian company which had a number of subsidiaries throughout the EU. Vega provided fuel cards to drivers employed by its subsidiaries to allow them to purchase fuel for the purpose of providing transport services. Vega paid for the fuel purchased with the fuel card and at a later date, on a monthly basis, passed on the cost of the fuel to its subsidiaries plus a surcharge. Accordingly, Vega allowed its subsidiaries to obtain the use of the fuel but only pay for that fuel at a later date, in return for an additional charge.  Vega sought to argue that this should be considered a VAT-exempt service to its Polish subsidiary of the provision of credit. The CJEU agreed with this analysis as it concluded that Vega had not bought and resold the fuel, but had instead provided it subsidiaries’ employees with an instrument to allow them to purchase fuel. The judgment reconfirmed a principle established in other cases that the VAT exemption for the granting of credit is not limited to loans or similar products granted by banks and financial institutions, but can in principle apply to other circumstances where an additional charge is levied for deferred payment. VAT recovery on investment activities The University of Cambridge case (Case C 316/18) asked whether there is any entitlement to recover VAT connected with activities that are outside the scope of VAT, if those activities could help generate funds for other VATable activities.  The University in this case provides VAT-exempt educational services as well as VATable services, such as commercial research, and therefore has a partial VAT recovery position on its general overhead costs. However, the University also received donations and endowments, which it invested through a fund. It was accepted that this investment activity was non-economic activity, i.e. outside the scope of VAT. The CJEU was asked whether the University could recover VAT on the management costs of the fund at its general overhead recovery rate.  The CJEU concluded that, based on the facts of the case, there was not the necessary direct and immediate link between the fund management costs and VATable output activities, and therefore the costs did not form part of the University’s overheads. Consequently, as the fund management costs instead related to an activity that was outside the scope of VAT, there was no entitlement to recover VAT on the fund management costs. David Duffy FCA, Chartered Tax Advisor, is a VAT Partner at KPMG.