Despite severe economic challenges, Northern Ireland has avoided the wave of corporate failures seen in England and Wales, though future risks remain uncertain, writes Gareth Latimer Since the onset of the global pandemic in March 2020, assessing the restructuring market has become increasingly important. This is evident by the recent publication of The Northern Ireland Labour Market Report and The Company Insolvency Statistics for Northern Ireland, which gives a detailed analysis of redundancies and insolvencies in Northern Ireland. Below, we discuss what this trend could mean. Redundancies and insolvencies in Northern Ireland Published in July this year, The Northern Ireland Labour Market Report has put the annual number of confirmed redundancies in Northern Ireland up to June 2024 at 2,560 – almost double the figure for the previous year (1,340). Similarly, The Company Insolvency Statistics for Northern Ireland for June 2024 highlighted 17 corporate insolvencies in June 2024, which was 13 percent higher than in June 2023. Understanding the statistics As with any statistics, we must delve beyond the headlines to see their impact on the Northern Ireland market. The raw numbers tell one story, but the underlying trends and their broader implications reveal much more about our economic landscape. Initial predictions and government intervention When the COVID-19 pandemic hit the UK in March 2020, some commentators predicted a ‘tsunami of corporate failures and mass redundancies’. Thanks to the introduction of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, commonly known as the Furlough Scheme, the predicted large number of redundancies did not occur. Additional liquidity measures Several other liquidity measures, including the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) and the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) also played their part in staving off the large number of corporate failures many had predicted. Financial lifelines, in the form of loans and grants, were available to allow companies to survive the various lockdowns and the unprecedented drop in GDP in April and June 2020. However, having recovered from the economic effects of the pandemic, we then had the Russia-Ukraine war and the subsequent energy crisis. High inflation and interest rates followed. It is no wonder, then, that companies have been struggling. New insolvency procedures To help companies facing insolvency, two new procedures were created when The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, which also applied to Northern Ireland, was implemented. Company moratorium: Designed to give struggling businesses formal breathing space in which to explore rescue and restructuring options, free from creditor and other legal action. Except in certain circumstances, insolvency proceedings cannot be instigated against a company during the moratorium period. Restructuring plans: Introduced to support viable companies struggling with unmanageable debt obligations. These plans allow the court to sanction a plan that binds creditors to a structuring plan if it is deemed fair and equitable. Creditors vote on the plan, but the court can impose it on dissenting classes of creditors (cram down) if the necessary conditions are met. However, despite the introduction of these new procedures, between 26 June 2020 and 30 June 2024, there was only one moratorium in Northern Ireland and no restructuring plans. The figures suggest that these options may hold less relevance for the Northern Ireland market compared to more traditional restructuring options. Labour market report insights One might have expected the Northern Ireland Labour Market Report to paint a bleak picture. The UK economy slipped into a mild recession in 2023, and the cost of living crisis continues. However, the anticipated surge in redundancies due to corporate failures has not materialised.  In fact, the unemployment rate in Northern Ireland for March to May 2024 fell over the quarter and the year to 2 percent. It is useful here to analyse and compare the June 2024 insolvency statistics. Northern Ireland saw 17 company insolvencies. And while each of these cases demonstrates financial distress for the company and employees involved, considering the economic backdrop, one might have anticipated a higher number of corporate failures. Indeed, this picture contrasts sharply with the headline insolvency statistics from England and Wales, where registered company insolvencies in June 2024 reached 2,361 – 16 percent higher than in May 2024 and 17 percent higher June 2023. The number of company insolvencies in England and Wales have remained much higher than those seen both during the COVID-19 pandemic and between 2014 and 2019. The disparity suggests that Northern Ireland’s insolvency rate is proportionately lower than that of England and Wales. Whether this resilience will hold, or if the rising tide of corporate failures in England and Wales will eventually reach these shores, remains to be seen. Future outlook with new government Given the recent Labour Party landslide victory in the UK, many are wondering how this shift will impact corporate failures and job redundancies. The new Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is poised to play a crucial role. A former Bank of England employee, Reeves has continually stressed the importance of fiscal discipline, and given the current state of public finances, she may have no choice. It appears that the economic strategy is to grow the economy, and this will improve the Treasury coffers; easy to say but harder to deliver. The future It seems that in 2024, Northern Ireland has been somewhat insulated from the wave of corporate failures sweeping through England and Wales. While specific factors contribute to this relative calm, the recent reports suggest that, despite ongoing economic pressures, we’ve seen more of a ripple than a tsunami of insolvencies. Thankfully, the anticipated surge in corporate failures has not materialised. Clearly, this is positive news for the economy. Yet, with the recent economic headwinds, one can’t help but wonder if we are simply delaying the inevitable. Will 2025 finally bring the wave of corporate failures some have been expecting? Only time will tell. Gareth Latimer is a Director at Grant Thornton NI

Fractional executives can bring genuine value to business leaders, offering specialised knowledge and niche experience on a flexible basis, writes Tony Dignam The business landscape has undergone significant transformation in recent years, driven by advances in technology, economic shifts and evolving work patterns.  One notable trend that has emerged is the rise of the fractional executive. These seasoned professionals offer their expertise to multiple companies on a part-time or “fractional” basis, providing strategic leadership without the commitment of a full-time role.  What is a fractional executive?  A fractional executive is an experienced leader who offer their services to businesses on a flexible basis as and when needed.  They can occupy various roles such as Chief Finance Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, Chief Technology Officer, and more.  These professionals can bring a wealth of experience and specialised skills to the table, helping companies navigate complex challenges and phases of growth or change.  Benefits of the fractional executive The concept of a fractional executive is not entirely new, but it has gained significant traction in recent years.  Economic uncertainties and the need for cost-effective solutions have driven many businesses to reconsider traditional employment models.  Hiring a full-time executive can mean a substantial overhead, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises that may not have the budget for high salaries and benefits packages.   Fractional executives offer a more affordable alternative, potentially allowing companies to access top-tier talent “on demand”.  The gig economy has revolutionised the way people work, with a particular emphasis on flexibility and project-based engagements.  Fractional executives fit perfectly into this model, offering their expertise for specific projects, limited periods or ongoing for an agreed number of days per week or per month.  This flexibility benefits both the executive, who enjoys diverse work experiences, and the company they work with, which can tap into specialised skills as needed.   Access to specialised expertise  Fractional executives often have broad subject matter expertise and plenty of relevant experience they can bring to the table and fast. Many will have held senior positions in their field and possess a deep understanding of best practices in their industry.  This knowledge can be invaluable for businesses looking to implement strategic initiatives or navigate complex change or growth.  Flexibility and scalability  One of the main advantages of fractional executives is their flexibility. Companies can engage them for specific projects, short-term needs, or on an ongoing fractional basis.  This scalability can give businesses more scope to adjust their executive resources according to their existing needs without long-term commitments.  Cost-effective leadership  Hiring a full-time executive can be a significant financial burden, especially for smaller companies. Fractional executives can offer a cost-effective alternative, potentially providing access to top-tier leadership at a lower cost.  This financial efficiency can be crucial for start-ups and SMEs operating on tight budgets, or for employers for whom long-term senior executive needs are harder to forecast.  Fresh perspectives  Fractional executives often work with multiple companies across different industries. This diverse experience means they can bring fresh and innovative perspectives to the businesses they serve.  Their ability to think outside the box can help companies to overcome challenges and seize new opportunities.  These executives sometimes also bring the benefit of fresh contacts and networks to senior teams, which can add value to scaling businesses. This means that the fractional executives can support and enhance business leadership by offering specialised expertise on a flexible, cost-effective basis.  Tony Dignam, FCA, is Managing Director of The Agile Executive

Embracing failure as a learning opportunity can drive innovation, turning business setbacks into strengths and fostering growth, writes Joanne Powell One of the challenges of innovation, advancement and continuous improvement is that sometimes getting it wrong is inevitable. No one likes to fail. We’re naturally predisposed to want to achieve and do better. Whether in life or in business, innovation, advancement and achievement are key markers of success. Traditionally, failure is either not an option or it is perceived as a sign of weakness. There is a growing body of thought that challenges traditional perspectives on failure, however. Business leadership author Simon Sinek talks about “falling” rather than “failure” – i.e. because you can get up from a fall and move forward. Amy Edmondson, Professor of Leadership at Harvard Business School, has written extensively on the notion that it “…doesn’t matter if you fail. It matters how you fail”. New York Times bestselling author, John C Maxwell, has noted that, “the difference between average people and achieving people is their perception of and response to failure.” There are any number of articles from Forbes, HBR and other notable journals in a similar vein. The key message is that failure can be a very positive catalyst for success – but only if done well. Doing failure ‘well’ means seeing it as a key part of the process: a chance to learn, to reflect and to move forward. It can also help to see lessons learned from failure as part of the inevitable tapestry of life. One of the ways I practice this myself is through inspiration from Mary Wallace, the Irish artist. Her popular Precious Bowls series is inspired by two Japanese concepts: Kintsugi: using gold or other precious metal to repair broken pottery. Wabi-sabi: seeing beauty in imperfection. For me, ideas around learning from failure really come together with the concept of wabi-sabi and the idea of “beauty in imperfection”. Some sources translate the concept of wabi-sabi as “nothing is perfect”, which is considered to be inherently positive as it suggests that there is always potential for 'more'. Kintsugi is an equally wonderful tradition, as it treats flaws and imperfections as part of the history of an object rather than something to be disguised or hidden. In the context of business, this can provide a constructive lens through which to process “failure” and to see the final product (or latest iteration) as being stronger and even more precious because of the journey it has travelled. I keep one of the Mary Wallace ‘Precious Bowls’ prints over my office desk. Every time I look at it, I’m reminded of three key principles: Every project or strategy has potential – The ethos behind any project or strategy should be one of continuous improvement. You must recognise that nothing is perfect and, instead, optimise the potential available. The ability to innovate and remain agile and open to change is key. Innovation requires us to take calculated risks and be open to the prospect of failure. It is knowing and understanding that sometimes we get it “wrong”, that strategies and innovations don't always produce the desired impacts. Wabi-sabi reminds me to take time to reflect and learn from “failure”, and to produce something better. Create and encourage strong, trust-filled and (psychologically) safe organisations. By creating a culture where stakeholders are encouraged to reflect and to find ways to improve, we are, in a way, creating our own version of kintsugi, where failure is recognised as an inevitable side-effect of any organisation that values innovation and progress. It is how we respond to these “failures” that matters most. Joanne Powell is Head of Advisor Services at QED: The Accreditation Experts

Advocating for yourself at work is vital, especially if you're a neurodivergent person. Antje Derks explains how to navigate workplace challenges and secure the support you need Advocating for yourself in the workplace can be challenging for anyone, but it can be especially daunting for those who are neurodivergent. Neurodivergence encompasses a range of conditions, including autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia and other cognitive differences that affect how individuals think, learn and interact with the world. While these differences can bring unique strengths to the workplace, they can also create specific needs and challenges. Understanding how to ask for reasonable accommodations and advocate for yourself is crucial for thriving in your professional environment. Neurodivergent individuals often have distinct ways of processing information, communicating and completing tasks. These differences can be assets, bringing innovative perspectives and problem-solving skills to a team. The traditional workplace environment may not always be conducive to neurodivergent work styles, however, leading to potential misunderstandings and obstacles. Workplace challenges Neurodivergent individuals often face specific challenges in the workplace. Sensory sensitivities, such as noise, lighting or office layouts, can overwhelm a neurodivergent brain, leading to overstimulation. Organisational and time management difficulties can also arise, as can challenges with social interactions and communication. Many neurodivergent colleagues appreciate clear, explicit instructions and feedback. The more precise and direct the language, the better. While this approach works well for many, it's important to remember that neurodivergence varies greatly from person to person. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Self-advocacy Self-advocacy involves understanding your own needs and communicating them effectively to others. For neurodivergent individuals, self-advocacy is essential for creating a work environment that supports their success. Here are key steps to advocate for yourself effectively. Familiarise yourself with workplace policies and legal protections related to disabilities In many countries, laws provide the right to reasonable accommodations. Take time to reflect on your specific needs and how certain accommodations can help you perform your job better. This might include flexible work hours, noise-cancelling headphones or written instructions for tasks. Schedule a meeting with your manager or HR representative to discuss your needs. Prepare to explain your neurodivergence in a way that highlights both your strengths and the challenges you face. Remember to use clear and specific language when requesting accommodations. For example, instead of saying, "I need a quieter workspace," you might say, "I need a desk in a quieter area of the office to help me concentrate better." It is important to try and frame your requests in a way that shows you are looking for solutions that benefit both you and the company. Emphasise how the adjustments will help you to be more productive and contribute effectively to the team by suggesting reasonable accommodations that are specific and actionable. For example, "Can I have a standing desk to help me stay focused?" or "Can we have a weekly check-in meeting to ensure I am on track with my projects?" will show your manager that you are actively seeking to take responsibility for yourself rather than shifting all the expectation on to them. Make reasonable adjustments depending on your needs Reasonable adjustments vary depending on individual needs and job requirements. Flexible work arrangements, such as remote work, flexible hours or modified schedules, can help manage sensory overload and align work with peak productivity times. Assistive technology, including speech-to-text software, organisational apps or noise-cancelling headphones, can aid concentration and efficiency. Physical workspace adjustments, like a quieter workspace, a standing desk or specific lighting, can create a more comfortable and productive environment. Structured communication, with clear, written instructions and regular feedback, ensures understanding and proper task execution, while regular check-ins can provide ongoing support and clarification. Additionally, access to a mentor or job coach who understands neurodiversity can offer valuable support and guidance. Monitor the effectiveness of the adjustments Communicate with your manager or HR about how well (or not) the adjustments are working for you. If things need tweaking slightly, don't hesitate to request them. Keep records Keep a record of your communications and any agreements made. This documentation can be helpful if you need to revisit the discussion or if there are any disputes. Promoting an inclusive workplace culture Advocating for yourself is an important step, but fostering a more inclusive workplace culture requires broader efforts from the whole organisation. Employers and colleagues can contribute by promoting awareness and understanding of neurodiversity through training and education, as well as encouraging open dialogue about individual needs and adjustments. But most importantly, it is about helping to create a supportive environment where all employees feel valued and included – whether they’re neurodivergent or not. By advocating for yourself and working towards a more inclusive workplace, you can not only enhance your own job satisfaction and performance but also contribute to a diverse and dynamic work environment where everyone's unique strengths are recognised and valued. Antje Derks is a Marketing Executive with Chartered Accountants Worldwide

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions A long-standing member of my team works to a good standard, but does the bare minimum. She is retiring soon. She takes no part in social outings and at team meetings, both in person and online, she works on her computer, only lifting her head to respond to direct questions. I have new people joining the team soon and I don’t want her muddying the water. I’m afraid if I tackle this, she will ‘go sick’. She has done this before. My team is under huge and growing pressure. A. It is so easy to feel undermined by one person, so pay close attention to where your energy goes. It’s essential to prioritise creating a positive experience for your new joiners as well as the rest of the team.  During interviews, induction and early reviews with your new team members, communicate this by organising a team lunch, bringing treats to meetings or refreshing the team meeting format. Also, take a look at the agenda: What is discussed? Who gets to talk, present, discuss or consult?  If you decide to deal directly with the issue, remember her behaviour has evolved for a reason and, in her head, makes perfect sense. Whether it’s discomfort, disrespect, payback or self-protection, there is a message in her behaviour. It could be interesting to find out why she seems disinterested in engaging with the team.  You need to be genuinely curious – this can be hard when you feel undermined and anxious. It’s possible the team member may need help getting back into the group. Consider pairing her up with someone on a project, asking her to train a new team member, or finding ways to acknowledge her long service and experience. If you decide to discuss this with her, start with the context (which you have outlined in your question): she is retiring soon, new people are starting and pressure is growing.  For those reasons, you need everyone to be fully present to onboard new joiners, deal with important issues and prepare for the future. This means putting the work away for a while.  You can be firm, gentle and respectful in this conversation. She may give you a range of reasons for her behaviour – for example, she’s too busy, the meeting takes too long, it’s not interesting, it doesn’t concern her or she knows all this stuff already.  Don’t argue with her. Agree and go back to your request: “I know you are busy but I need you there. So, how can we make it a more useful meeting?”   Be sure to have an exit strategy ready to avoid going round in circles.  The request you are making to this long-serving team member is reasonable. If you receive an outright refusal, the stakes get very high (and we are firmly in ‘going sick’ territory).  Consider your options: Do you stick with the status quo? Insist she engages with the team? Ask her not to attend team meetings if she can’t pay attention?   Telling her, “I’d rather have you there than not there, but I’d really appreciate it if you were fully present,” might be the safest option and keeps the door open. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant with Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and  team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie

The ethical use of AI and how it is governed today and as it continues to evolve in the years ahead is top of mind for many in the profession. Accountancy Ireland asks three Chartered Accountants for their take on the ethics of AI Owen Lewis  Head of AI and Management Consulting KPMG in Ireland It is crucial for all of us in the profession to ensure the integrity and transparency of solutions driven by artificial intelligence (AI).  We must audit and validate AI algorithms to ensure they comply with regulatory standards and ethical guidelines. Monitoring systems for biases and inaccuracies is also crucial to ensuring that financial data and decisions remain fair and reliable. By providing independent oversight, we can help to maintain trust in AI-driven financial processes and outcomes for clients.  Where AI is used to inform large-scale decisions, it should be supplemented with significant governance measures, such as explainability, transparency, human oversight, data quality and model robustness and performance requirements. This technology is continuing to advance rapidly, and we need to be open to both its current and potential capabilities.  By putting the correct governance mechanisms and controls in place – beginning with low-risk test applications and building from there – organisations can adopt AI safely and obtain real benefits from its use. I am working with organisations to help them think through what AI means for them, develop strategies for its adoption, put the necessary governance and controls in place, scale solutions sensibly and ensure business leaders get real value from their investment.  Whatever their goal may be – more efficient operations, accelerated content generation or improved engagement with stakeholders – we help organisations decide if AI can help, and if it can, how to use it in the right way. >Bob Semple Experienced Director Governance and Risk Management Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most misunderstood, yet transformative, technologies impacting the way we work today. Here are 10 essential steps Chartered Accountants should take to navigate the landscape of AI effectively. Take a leadership role – If we don’t take the lead, we risk missing the golden opportunity AI presents. Conduct an AI “stocktake” –According to a recent Microsoft survey, 75 percent of employees are already using AI. Identifying current AI usage within your organisation is essential. Assess the downside risks of AI – Legislative and regulatory requirements are exploding (e.g. NIS 2, the AI Act, DORA and more) and risks abound (AI bias, explainability, privacy, IP, GDPR, cyber security, resilience, misuse, model drift and more). Organisations must act on their AI responsibilities. Conduct a dataset stocktake – Just as the Y2K challenge was about identifying IT systems, today’s challenge is to catalogue all datasets, as these are crucial for AI functionality. Draft appropriate policies and procedures – Establish clear responsibilities and accountability for AI initiatives. Pay special attention to how AI impacts decision-making processes. Strengthen data curation – Implement new processes to improve how data is collected and used. Identify opportunities for the smart use of AI – Brainstorm and prioritise AI use-cases that can drive efficiency and innovation. Provide training – Ensure that board members, management and staff are all adequately trained on AI principles and applications. Manage the realisation of benefits – Safeguard against excessive costs and subpar returns by carefully managing the implementation of AI projects. Update audit and assurance approaches – Seek independent assurance on AI applications and leverage AI to enhance risk, control and audit processes. As we adopt AI, it is critical that we pay particular attention to distorted agency – i.e. giving too much agency to, or relying unduly on, AI outputs and doubting our own agency to make the most important decisions. Exercising professional judgement is the key to minimising the risks associated with AI and realising its benefits, and that surely is the strength of every Chartered Accountant. *Note: GPT4 was used to assist in drafting this article.   Níall Fitzgerald Head of Ethics and Governance Chartered Accountants Ireland Artificial intelligence (AI) is proving to be transformative, impacting competitiveness and how business is done.  Chartered Accountants Ireland has engaged with members working in various finance and C-suite positions, including chief executives, chief financial officers and board members, to understand how AI is impacting their day-to-day work.  One thing is clear. AI is being used in some shape or form in many businesses across the country.  In 2023, the Institute’s response to the UK’s Financial Reporting Council proposals on introducing governance requirements for the use of AI noted several governance mechanisms that are likely to be impacted by AI currently or in the very near future in many organisations.  We highlighted the focus on corporate purpose and how market forces, emerging threats and opportunities driven by AI, may challenge the purpose of an organisation and its long-term objectives.  AI may impact how organisations decide on their strategic focus in terms of how they deliver their product or service and, indeed, how their product or service is designed in the first instance.  It may also impact these organisations’ values as they consider how to deploy and use AI in an ethical manner. The EU AI Act, which enters into force on 1 August 2024 over a phased basis, introduces requirements for the development of codes of conducts, risk and impact assessments and staff training to ensure adequate human oversight around the use of AI systems within organisations. This has specific resonance for Chartered Accountants who are members of a profession bound by a code of ethics governing objectivity, confidentiality, integrity, professional behaviour and competence and due care. Chartered Accountants must now ensure that they understand how AI uses, analyses and then outputs data.  Organisations must ensure that any AI-driven information they share, and how they deploy the technology itself, satisfies principles of integrity, honesty and transparency.  Chartered Accountants are well-positioned, with their ethical mindsets, to ensure the integrity of AI systems, and their use within organisations.

As the “year of elections” continues to unfold, Ireland faces a changing global tax environment, but with change comes the opportunity to position the country as a beacon of stability for continued FDI. Cillein Barry and Susan Buggle dig into the details As a small, open economy, Ireland is a competitive location for foreign direct investment (FDI). However, we are also subject to the impact of changes to tax regimes globally, most notably those driven by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the European Union (EU) and the US. Changes to the tax regime in the US, in particular, have an indirect material impact on Ireland’s attractiveness as a location for FDI.  This year has been cited as “the year of elections”, with roughly half the world’s population going to the polls in 2024. The outcome of elections across the EU and, later this year, in the US may serve to shape future tax policy impacting Ireland.  Here at home, though the Irish Government has denied claims of an early election in 2024, an anticipated “giveaway” budget on 1 October means an early Irish election remains a distinct possibility. The US presidential election and tax policy While the outcome of the US presidential election cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time, we do have some insight into the tax policy objectives of both the Democrats and the Republicans should they come to power this year.  In considering possible changes to US tax policy, it is important to note that the approval of tax legislation generally requires 60 votes out of 100 in the US Senate.  This means that one party must hold a large majority or, alternatively, there must be bi-partisan co-operation to approve any proposed changes to tax policy. Neither of these scenarios seems likely in the aftermath of the upcoming presidential election.  While tax legislation may also be passed by a simple majority using a process known as “budget reconciliation”, the relevant tax measures cannot increase the long-term deficit of the US.  In an era of limited bi-partisan co-operation, significant US tax reform is therefore unlikely, as it would require either a super-majority in the Senate or the introduction of tax measures regarded as fiscally neutral over the long-term.  Understanding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act In 2017, then US President Donald Trump’s Republican administration introduced some of the most significant reforms to the US tax code in three decades under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).  The key measures for US businesses were broadly designed to lower the US corporate tax rate to one more comparable with competitors among OECD member countries and to protect the US tax base. These included: Corporate income tax rate: a reduction of the US corporate income tax rate from 28 to 21 percent. Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI): a 10.5 percent tax on a portion of the income earned by foreign subsidiaries of US companies. Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII): a preferential rate of 13.25 percent for income earned by US companies outside the US on certain intellectual property. Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT): a minimum 10 percent tax on base erosion payments made by US entities to related parties outside the US. The TCJA was introduced using the budget reconciliation process at a time when there was a Republican congressional majority combined with a Republican president – not a single Democrat voted in its favour.  Having already introduced such significant reform, what more could the Republican side seek to introduce in 2025? In answering this question, it is important to note that a large part of the TCJA measures were temporary, with 25 of the tax cuts introduced under the Act due to expire in 2025. This includes a slated increase in the rate of GILTI (10.5% to 13.125%), BEAT (10% to 12.5%) and FDII (13.125% to 16.406%). The Republicans are likely to face pressure from US businesses to reverse these planned increases and preserve the impact of the TCJA.  However, the Republicans are also likely to face pressure to extend several individual tax cuts included in the TCJA, which together impact more than half of US households. Indeed, both Democrats and Republicans are in favour of retaining at least some of these measures. The Democrats’ tax proposals The Democrats’ preferred tax policy was outlined in March 2024 in Joe Biden’s “Green Book” budget proposals. These proposals seek to reverse many of the TCJA tax cuts and include: Increasing the corporate tax rate from 21 to 28 percent; Increasing to the GILTI rate from 10.5 to 21 percent; and A repeal of the preferential rate for FDII. To introduce such tax proposals under a new leader, the Democrats would likely require a significant majority, as it would be challenging to introduce such measures while balancing the books to achieve a fiscally neutral outcome.  US Presidential elections: the likely outcome Many US commentators predict a split government in the aftermath of the US presidential elections, with neither party controlling the House and Senate.  Marrying this with the complex procedures required to pass tax legislation and the political pressure to preserve tax cuts for individuals, the most likely outcome for US business taxation is little change to the status quo regardless of who will be elected as the new US President.  Though Republican rhetoric has centred on cutting the federal corporate income tax rate to 15 percent, this should be viewed in a similar light, although the threat of 10 percent tariffs and the EU’s response will need to be monitored closely.  The other key area to watch is US engagement with the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 tax proposals. Under Pillar Two of BEPS 2.0, this year has seen the most significant change in international tax in recent memory, with many countries, including Ireland, introducing a minimum 15 percent tax on the corporate profits of large multinational groups.  Despite positive indications from the US Treasury, achieving sufficient political support to introduce the Pillar Two proposals in the US has proved elusive. However, the mechanics of these rules will mean that US-headquartered groups are likely to be affected by the global minimum tax rules from 2026 onwards.  If Pillar Two plans proceed as anticipated, it remains to be seen how the US will react and whether the party in power will seek to introduce retaliatory measures.  Republicans sitting on the powerful Ways and Means Committee have already outlined proposals to impose an additional five percent tax rate each year on the US income of entities located in foreign jurisdictions applying the Pillar Two rules.  The outlook in Europe We have witnessed significant political developments across Europe in recent weeks, including the election of a new European Parliament in June and domestic parliamentary elections taking place in several neighbouring European countries, most notably France and the UK.  In July, Hungary took over its Presidency of the Council of the European Union and Ursula von der Leyen was re-elected as the President of the European Commission. EU commissioners and working groups will be appointed in the coming weeks. These developments will play a key role in shaping the future direction of taxation policy in the EU.  Recent years have seen the introduction of a swathe of EU-wide tax initiatives, including measures aimed at tackling tax avoidance (e.g. the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive), measures to increase transparency (e.g. the EU public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive) and measures to introduce OECD BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two provisions across the EU via the Minimum Tax Directive.  While Pillar Two has progressed, work on the OECD’s other key initiative to reallocate a portion of the profits of the largest multinational groups to jurisdictions in which customers are located (known as Pillar One) is at best delayed, but more likely dead.   With progress on Pillar One potentially stalling, a renewed focus may be placed on introducing alternative Digital Service Taxes (DSTs), either unilaterally or on an EU-wide basis. In this regard, the current moratorium on introducing DSTs at an EU level is due to expire on 31 December 2024. EU-wide tax measures EU institutions are continuing to work on a range of other tax measures, including Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT), a proposal for a consolidated EU tax base that would be allocated to Member States, and the proposed “Unshell Directive” aimed at tackling the potential misuse of entities without sufficient substance for tax purposes. It remains to be seen which tax initiatives will get priority treatment under the incoming Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the EU, with its stated slogan – “Make Europe Great Again” – focusing on European competitiveness as a key priority.  This is likely to signal shifting sands ahead for EU taxation policies, particularly in the context of Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orban publicly calling BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two “a catastrophic failure,” serving to dampen competitiveness.  EU Member States have also advised the European Commission to slow the pace of development of direct tax proposals, given the significant volume of measures introduced in recent years. Therefore, a more benign approach to tax policy is expected at an EU level for the foreseeable future. Shifting taxation policy: the Irish impact  In an environment of increasing uncertainty, it is worth bearing in mind Ireland’s unique position as an economic gateway for both Europe and the US.  While US investment in Ireland is well-publicised with more than 950 US companies located here, Ireland now also ranks as the ninth largest foreign direct investor in the US, employing about 100,000 people in the States.  Ireland is also the only English-speaking common law trade and investment gateway to the EU. Ireland’s competitive corporate tax rate and transparent and stable tax policies have been a crucial factor in attracting FDI. This tax policy has consistent cross-party support.  Other key factors include our highly educated and skilled pool of graduates, particularly in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), our clear and consistent regulatory environment in key areas such as data protection, and Ireland’s attractiveness as a place to live and work. Ireland must, however, guard against complacency. In a constantly evolving environment, it is essential that we focus on ensuring that Ireland remains a competitive and attractive location for FDI. This includes reducing the cost of doing business and facilitating access to talent.  On a global basis, tax competition remains alive and well and a new wave of incentives and subsidies is being introduced by competing jurisdictions.  Our regimes for attracting high-value jobs and businesses – particularly our research and development (R&D) tax credit, reliefs for intellectual property and international assignees – continue to be key pillars in this space.  With ongoing uncertainty within the EU and across the Atlantic, we now have an opportunity to position Ireland as a beacon of stability and a safe harbour jurisdiction for foreign direct investment. This opportunity must be grasped.    Cillein Barry is Tax Partner with KPMG  Susan Buggle is Tax Principal with KPMG

Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the US presidential race marked the departure of the last “Atlanticist” in American politics and Europe is ill-prepared for what lies ahead, writes Judy Dempsey  The decision by Joe Biden not to run against Donald Trump has upturned American politics. There are so many uncertainties about who will be elected as the next president of the United States on 5 November.  Until then, America will be preoccupied with domestic politics. It’s going to demand huge effort by the departments of state and defence to keep the focus on Ukraine, Israel and what is happening in the Middle East, not to mention China.   With the exception of Ukraine, Europe is a bystander, but Biden’s decision could change the transatlantic relationship.  Few European leaders, apart from French President Emmanuel Macron, understand how this fundamental shift in transatlantic dynamics could affect Europe’s defence, security and intelligence gathering.  Biden is the last “Atlanticist.” His career, experience in foreign policy and age made him a believer in the enduring bonds between the United States and Europe. Yes, his administration complained about Europeans not taking their defence or security seriously, but intellectually and emotionally, he is an Atlanticist.  Donald Trump cares little about Europe, the EU, NATO, or the idea of “the West”. Even if Europe increased its share of defence spending to NATO, it would never be enough. For Trump, Europeans are free-riders and unable collectively to think and act defensively. For him, this is Europe’s problem, not America’s. Just as Ukraine is not America’s problem either. If a Democrat wins the US presidential election, they will likely belong to the younger generation whose past has no connection with Europe and which is more attuned to the emerging competition between the United States and China, Russia and other countries resentful of America and what it represents.  This shift also has major implications for Europe’s security, its economy and future developments in Ukraine. Yet, Europe is not prepared for the changes taking place across the Atlantic.  The post-1945 era that was built on multilateral institutions, arms control and a confident West is ending, so what can Europe do to deal with such irreversible change?  EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen wants Europe to have a Defense Tsar and a collective defense-spending policy. Neither is likely to fly – and not just because neutral countries would not buy into them.  Germany has rejected proposals to finance new defence purchases through joint borrowing, arguing that there is already enough industrial and research funding for defence.  On top of this, because defence is such a national issue, it is hard to see member states ceding any of this sovereignty to Brussels. The real issue here is Europe. The 27 member states can’t agree on which direction the union should take. More political and economic integration would make sense, but several countries want to regain more sovereignty at the expense of making Europe capable of speaking with one voice.   As the United States and the West decline, there is a chance for Europe to step in. Unfortunately, member states and EU leaders lack the courage to do what is needed.  Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

Chartered Star 2024 winner Evan O’Donnell talks to Susan Rossney, Sustainability Advocacy Manager with Chartered Accountants Ireland, about the future of sustainability in the profession Evan O’Donnell was recently named Chartered Star 2024, an annual designation recognising outstanding work in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).   Run in partnership with One Young World and Chartered Accountants Worldwide, the aim of the annual Chartered Star competition is to celebrate the difference-makers in the profession who are helping to combat the climate crisis by bringing real, positive change to their workplaces and communities. As Chartered Star 2024, O’Donnell will attend the One Young World Summit, representing Chartered Accountants Ireland and Chartered Accountants Worldwide, in Montreal, Canada, in September. Here, he talks to Susan Rossney about his interest in sustainability and social responsibility. Tell us about your decision to become a Chartered Accountant. What attracted you to the profession? I loved accounting in secondary school – that “yes” moment when you know your inputs are the same as your outputs! My mother was a mathematics teacher, and my father was a banker, so figures are certainly in my DNA.  I studied accounting at University College Cork, but it wasn’t until I attended a careers fair that I understood the versatility of a career in accounting and the many doors Chartered Accountancy can open.  Have you always been interested in sustainability?  I’ve been interested in social responsibility from the time I was 16 when I travelled to India and worked with street and slum children in Calcutta.  Since then, I’ve volunteered for a range of charities, including Trócaire, Mary’s Meals, HOPE, Cork Penny Dinners, Pieta, Irish Guide Dogs for the Blind, the Irish Cancer Society and Breakthrough Cancer Research.  My interest in sustainability started when I led a sustainable gardening project at college. Volunteers completed training certificates and visited local nursing homes to assist the elderly residents in planting flowers and growing vegetables. It showed me what was possible. Since then, I’ve looked for opportunities to do more and was delighted when I got the chance to host a sustainability networking event at the Apple headquarters in Cork when I was Co-Chairperson of Chartered Accountants Student Society Cork. What initially sparked your interest in becoming a Chartered Star? I heard about the Chartered Star competition during the first year of my training contract with PwC.  In 2020, I was fortunate to be part of a fantastic network, the Irish FinBiz Task Force, with 30 finance and business professionals across Ireland. It had been founded by two previous Chartered Stars and, as the years went on, more Chartered Stars emerged from the network. I was on the network’s SDG Awareness Team where Patrycja Jurkowska (2019 winner) provided us with great insight and knowledge on the topic.  I saw how the competition opened many doors for my colleagues, and I felt it was an opportunity to meet amazing ambassadors of sustainability, be part of a knowledge platform and share key learnings with my network.  I am very proud to be part of the Chartered Accountants Ireland Chartered Star family! What do you see as the greatest sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities for Ireland?  Ireland faces significant sustainability challenges, but also has many opportunities. Climate change is causing more extreme weather, threatening infrastructure and agriculture. Biodiversity loss, due to urbanisation and intensive farming, is reducing ecosystem services like pollination and water purification. Resource depletion, including water scarcity and soil degradation, is harming agriculture and water supplies. Economic risks include the vulnerability of agriculture to climate variability and potential negative impacts on tourism from environmental degradation.  Dependence on fossil fuels poses a risk as global policies shift towards renewables.  Social risks involve health issues from heatwaves and pollution, as well as displacement due to coastal erosion.  Regulatory risks stem from the high costs of complying with EU environmental regulations. However, through all this, there are significant opportunities.  Renewable energy development, particularly wind and marine energy, can reduce fossil fuel dependence and create jobs.  Sustainable agriculture, including organic farming and agroforestry, can boost biodiversity and resilience.  Green technology and innovation, such as circular economy practices and smart grids, can enhance sustainability and efficiency.  By implementing robust policies through the Climate Action Plan and participating in the EU Green Deal, Ireland can lead in global sustainability efforts, attract investment and build a resilient future. Where do you see opportunities for young professional Chartered Accountants in sustainability? Chartered Accountants have many opportunities to help meet sustainability challenges. We can leverage our skills in financial analysis and reporting to enhance transparency in sustainability metrics, ensuring that companies’ environmental and social impacts are accurately reported and assessed.  We can specialise in sustainability assurance, auditing environmental, social and governance (ESG) reports to provide stakeholders with credible information. We can advise businesses on integrating sustainable practices into their operations and strategies and identify cost-saving measures through energy efficiency, waste reduction and sustainable supply chain management.  We can also influence policy by working with regulatory bodies to shape sustainability standards and frameworks.  Additionally, we can drive innovation by supporting the development of green finance products, such as green bonds and sustainable investment funds.  By combining our financial expertise with a commitment to sustainability, young professional Chartered Accountants can play a crucial role in fostering sustainable economic growth and addressing global environmental challenges. Can you tell us about your sustainability role with PwC? I always had a passion for sustainability, and I wanted to incorporate this into my day-to-day life at PwC.  During my time with PwC Cork, I worked in the Assurance Department specialising in high-technology and pharmaceutical company audits along with pensions and grant engagements.  In 2019, while on placement, I was on the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee, and worked under the food pillar of PwC Ireland’s Sustainability Council, focusing on food waste reduction initiatives primarily in PwC offices around Ireland.  I also became an SDG Champion with PwC by completing ‘The Sustainable Life School’ course. This course inspired me to apply for, and later become, a Climate Ambassador earlier this year, where I have equipped myself with education about climate. What does being named Chartered Star 2024 mean to you?  Being the Chartered Star, an ambassador of Chartered Accountants, means representing my profession and country on a global stage.  Having been selected to attend the One Young World Summit in Montreal this September, I am deeply honoured and grateful to have this opportunity.  The Summit brings together young leaders from around the world to discuss and address critical global issues, including sustainability, innovation and social impact. I am committed to making both my profession and my country proud by actively participating in the Summit, sharing insights and learning from global peers. This unique experience will enable me to bring valuable knowledge and innovative ideas back to my colleagues, fostering growth and development within our community.  I look forward to leveraging this platform to highlight the pivotal role of Chartered Accountants in driving sustainable and ethical business practices, ultimately contributing to a better future for all.

Lindsay Russell, a Partner with EY Northern Ireland, talks to Liz Riley about the evolution of her career, professional inspiration and constant thirst for knowledge, variety and challenge in her working life  My interest in accountancy was first sparked as a teenager. During school holidays, while doing my GCSEs and A Levels, my parents encouraged me to gain valuable work experience, which led to a job with WHR Accountants in Armagh under the tutelage of Ken Harrison, one of the founding partners.  WHR had a fantastic team of about 15 who took me under their wing and got me started with the basics of accounting.  After writing out many cheque journals, cash books and extended trial balances manually, I learned that “balancing” numbers gave me a great sense of satisfaction. Something clicked and I realised that accountancy was a career I wanted to pursue.  This summer job continued for four years and greatly influenced my decision to study accountancy at university in Scotland. After graduating, I was fortunate to secure a position with EY Northern Ireland in 2004 and completed my professional exams in 2006. It has been a real privilege to become a Chartered Accountant, specifically an auditor in practice.  As auditors, we are afforded an insight into so many successful organisations across sectors and industries and are in a unique position to support and work with talented individuals through complex and interesting transactions and business initiatives.   The trust we provide as accountants, auditors and business advisors is something that is often underplayed, but is vital to the capital markets and the success of organisations, and I still consider myself lucky to say I play a part in that.  Almost 20 years later in this profession, and I have not looked back. Championing women In those 20 years, I have seen significant changes in the gender profile of our profession, particularly in the last decade.  I am pleased to have been part of this change personally, but what I am really proud of is being able to champion and sponsor female talent within our profession to ensure that others can share in the experiences and opportunities I was afforded early in my career.  As a female partner and leader, I am acutely aware of the responsibility I have in championing other women in our profession. In the long term, my goal is that we create a profession, industry and world in which such an active focus on gender diversity is no longer essential because we have created an environment where opportunities are afforded equally to all people and are fulfilled based on the right person for the role, regardless of gender or any other characteristics.  However, I know we still have some way to travel to make this a reality. I fully appreciate and understand that we must create the right environment for all our talented people to flourish.  For example, organisations must take parental responsibilities and flexible working into consideration. They must do all they can to provide a workplace in which working mothers know they can have a sustainable and rewarding career. I would also highlight that, while gender diversity is important to me as a female leader, I believe that diversity of thought, background and experience is the basis for excellence in any team.  It is not only the experiences of diverse groups, but also their willingness to be open to the views and experiences of others, that creates the best and highest-performing teams, delivering the most for clients and helping to build a better working environment for all.  Embracing education in your career I believe professional development is achieved via a combination of formal learning and on-the-job development.  Formal learning is very important, particularly in our changing regulatory environment, and I find it useful to check my own Continuing Professional Development (CPD) monthly and quarterly to ensure I am on track for compliance.  However, I also find on-the-job learning critical in putting all the theory we learn into practice, and developing the wider skill set that is so valuable and necessary for the accountants of today and tomorrow.  We are living in a world in which technology and the way we work is continuing to evolve, particularly with the advent of generative artificial intelligence. My advice is to embrace change and learn as much as you can from those around you.  Lastly, I would say it’s important to remember that the accountancy skill set remains as valuable today as it ever was and will remain a key part of the workplaces and businesses of tomorrow.  The fluidity of work-life balance There is no magic answer to work-life balance. For me, work-life balance is something that is fluid and needs to be reassessed and flexed regularly and continuously.  I learned an important lesson early in my career: your work-life balance will have ebbs and flows depending on what is going on in both your work and home life.  It is important to be flexible at times and, at others, to know and stand by your “non-negotiables.”  I recognise that at certain times I will have busier and more demanding times in the office, and that it is important to stay focused for the benefit of my teams and my clients.  Equally as important is the need to have planned downtime. I am protective of this downtime when it arrives so I can make sure my family and friends get a fully committed version of me. Everyone will have different styles and different ways of working. My advice is to ensure you understand your own style. Know your peak times, take time out and ensure you communicate clearly with those around you, both personally and professionally, about your work-life balance needs.  Stepping outside your comfort zone When I look back over my career, I can see that my biggest development has come about when I have embraced new opportunities (or challenges) and have been pushed out of my comfort zone.  It is very easy to stay comfortable, but trying new things, seeking out new learning opportunities and working with different people and teams is what accelerates our development, and ultimately, our career prospects.  My career advice is to say “yes” and give it your all. You will always be amazed at where it can take you! It is sometimes the tasks or roles that you think you didn’t want – or didn’t think you would be good at – that are the ones that help you progress and move on to your next role.  I also like to remind people that variety and new opportunities can come from staying in the same job or profession and do not always require drastic change.  I have been with EY for almost 20 years now, which feels increasingly rare in a world where new opportunities are everywhere. I am proof that you can have a varied career with many different roles and opportunities all with the same employer and within the same profession. My final piece of advice is to be honest and true to yourself. Someone once told me to hold a mirror up and be honest with myself about my strengths and weaknesses and what I ultimately want from my career.  I realised early on that I get easily bored and need variety in my work. I know that I am competitive, hard-working and need to feel I am adding value. I recognise that this combination of attributes means I often work too hard.  However, it also means that I am continuously rewarded with challenging opportunities for development, which keeps me motivated and stimulated.  Everyone in our profession must figure out what works for them and remember that their career path, regardless of direction, should be unique to them. Your career doesn’t have to replicate what anyone else before you has done, or what those around you are doing today.

Cormac Lucey explores the misunderstood roots of Ireland’s FDI success and questionable management of surging tax revenues against the backdrop of rising state spending Two important aspects of Ireland’s multinational success story are generally misunderstood.  The first concerns the low-tax strategy that has been the key reason many multinationals have located in Ireland.  As Professor Frank Barry of Trinity College Dublin revealed in his essay “Foreign Investment and the Politics of Export Profits Tax Relief 1956”, this low-tax strategy resulted from then Taoiseach John A. Costello overruling the Department of Finance and forcing an idea promoted by the Department of Industry and Commerce into the Budget.  Underlining the precariousness and capriciousness of life, this strategy didn’t begin to really function until the 1990s.  The second aspect of our multinational story, not generally understood, is how utterly dependent our economy is on American business.  While it is widely known that more than 85 percent of the state’s corporation tax revenues come from multinationals, their contribution to other tax headings is not so well-known.  When you consider multinationals’ 55 percent share of Ireland’s income taxes and 54 percent share of VAT – and apply this lower 54 percent rate to other tax headings – you will see that the multinational sector contributes over 60 percent of the State’s total tax revenues.  How well is the state managing the resulting surge in tax revenues? Well, it’s all being spent, and then some.  According to the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council’s Fiscal Assessment Report published in June 2024, “Excluding excess corporation tax receipts, a deficit of €2.7 billion (0.9% GNI) is forecast for this year. This comes despite a strong economy, with record high employment and historically low unemployment. The question arises: if underlying surpluses are not being run now that the economy is strong, when would they be run?” The quality of much of this spending is highly questionable. The epicentre of rampant State spending growth is occurring in healthcare. A recent Department of Health report analysed hospital activity and expenditure between 2016 and 2022.  It reported a 3.8 percent increase in overall activity, compared with an inflation-adjusted rise in expenditure of 45 percent (nominal rise of 68 percent) and a 29 percent increase in staffing numbers. The Department of Health badly needs budgetary incontinence pads. Or maybe members of the Irish public service simply need to learn how to manage.  Consequence-free management is the key obstacle to effective budgetary control. When staff are treated the same regardless of whether they perform extraordinarily well or extraordinarily badly, should we be surprised when mediocrity results?  The Republic’s governing political class is happy to bask in the reflected glory of multinational-induced prosperity. However, according to the 2023 annual report from the IDA, Ireland’s inward investment agency, the global foreign direct investment landscape is becoming “increasingly challenging and complex.”  And, if he becomes the next US President, Donald Trump plans to significantly undermine Ireland’s attractiveness to US multinationals by putting a 10 percent tariff on US imports. Even though it accounts for 69 percent of employment, Ireland’s domestic sector of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is the orphan of this story. SMEs need targeted tax incentives along the lines of those outlined by Deloitte’s Kim Doyle in the Accountancy Ireland newsletter Briefly. The SME sector also needs a systematic programme to reduce the regulatory burden imposed upon it. Under the guidance of Michael Diviney, Chartered Accountants Ireland recently published Reducing Red Tape, a detailed position paper showing just how that could be done.  The instinctive mindset of government – that ministers are in charge of a great national trainset they can play with at will – flies in the face of the reality that policy decisions involve tricky trade-offs not amenable to facile headlines.  Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.  

Ireland’s medium-sized businesses are more optimistic than their global peers but a more ambitious approach is needed to deliver their expectations, writes Patrick Dillon Ireland’s medium-sized businesses are uniquely optimistic in their outlook ahead of the upcoming US presidential elections and in the wake of the recent elections in France and the UK.  Just 17 percent see geopolitical disruptions as a barrier to growth, compared to 42 percent in the Eurozone and 49 percent globally. This confidence follows through in the main findings among the Irish respondents to our latest Grant Thornton International Business Report (IBR), which captures insights into the outlook of 10,000 mid-market firms across the globe.  Our Irish IBR respondents are optimistic about the outlook for the Irish economy in the 12 months ahead. Close to three-quarters (73%) of the Irish medium-sized companies we surveyed predict a positive future. The findings are reflective of the resilience of Irish companies that have had to navigate a polycrisis in a short period of time, trading through the pandemic, cost-of-living challenges and disruption to global supply chains. This is not just a case of looking at the world through rose-tinted glasses, however. Irish medium-sized companies are anticipating a healthy bottom line over the next year.  Close to three-fifths of the Irish companies we surveyed predict a rise in revenues (57%), profits (59%), and headcount (52%) in the 12 months ahead. While it is fantastic to see such a strong sense of confidence among this cornerstone of the Irish economy, if the last few years have taught us anything, it is that none of us knows what’s around the corner.  To this end, the companies that will continue to succeed in the future will be those that remain hyper-focused on staying one step ahead of the competition – and this is where our International Business Report makes for slightly more concerning reading.  There is a significant difference in attitudes to innovation among Irish firms compared to their international peers. Just under a quarter (24%) of Irish businesses are preparing to increase investment in research and development over the next twelve months compared to three-fifths (60%) of their global peers.  We found a similar gap in levels of planned technology investment, with just under half (48%) of Ireland’s medium-sized firms budgeting for an increase, compared to 67 percent globally. Ireland is a small pool compared to the ocean that is the global marketplace. If Irish firms are to realise their ambition and potential, then they need to look to new markets.  Investing in innovation is key to unlocking these opportunities, whether it is leveraging digital channels to reach customers in every corner of the world or developing tailored products or services for a specific customer segment internationally.  A confident economic outlook is great, but it doesn’t put money in your pocket. To paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, an investment in innovation pays the best interest.   Patrick Dillon is Head of Deal Advisory with Grant Thornton Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

Revisions to International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 600 will result in higher-quality group audits, but more work will be required to deliver this benefit, writes Noreen O’Halloran The International Standard on Auditing (ISA) (Ireland) 600 has been revised. Issued by the Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority (IAASA), the revised standard applies to the audit of group financial statements.  Effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2023, these revisions aim to enhance audit quality and address inconsistencies in practice. They bring some challenges, however.  The purpose of ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised (the revised standard) is to enhance the quality of the audit delivered, by ensuing better co-ordination and understanding  between the group auditor and the auditor of a group component.  Audit committees, along with group and component management teams, will also experience changes in how the group auditor conducts the group audit.  Roles and responsibilities Various definitions are amended within the revised standard. These include the definition of a component, which now includes entities, business units, functions or business activities, or some combination thereof, determined by the group auditor for the purposes of planning and performing audit procedures in a group audit.  This concept of the auditor’s view of a component marks a departure from the previous standard. Under the previous standard, a component was identified by the group auditor based on the level at which the group or component management prepared the financial information.  As a result, audit committees can expect to see some changes in the identification of the components for the purpose of the group audit. The group engagement partner is responsible for the work performed by the engagement team. The definition of “engagement team” within ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised includes component auditors.  Therefore, it must be clarified that the group engagement partner along with members of the engagement team – other than component auditors (i.e. the group auditor) – will take responsibility for the nature, timing and extent of the direction and supervision of the component auditor’s work and the review of such work.  To fulfil this obligation, in addition to engaging with group management, the group engagement partner will need to be more involved with component auditors and, potentially, component management.  The definition of “significant components” has been removed. This means that there is no longer a set quantitative threshold above which a significant component’s financial information must be audited.  Rather, a more risk-based approach is required. Emphasis has been given to the consideration of the risk of material misstatement at the assertion level of the group financial statements associated with components.  This will mean that more decisions are made by the group auditor in terms of the level of work that is to be performed by each component and by whom this work will be performed. Component auditors may, therefore, expect changes to the scope of their work compared to previous years. The definition of group financial statements has been clarified. The standard focuses on the concept of a consolidation process. This includes the aggregation of the financial information of business units and is wider than the definition of the consolidated financial statement in financial reporting. As a result, audit committees may see a change in the approach to auditing an entity with multiple branches or divisions, as this is now considered to be a group audit.  The standard emphasises the need for a comprehensive approach to auditing all components contributing to group financial statements, ensuring that the audit covers all relevant aspects of the group’s financial reporting. The clarity regarding the definition of a component (including the removal of the significant component), the involvement of the engagement team and the responsibility of the group auditor, may enhance the quality of the audit delivered.  However, additional time will be incurred by the group auditor as a result, who must now ensure that all component auditors are adequately supervised.  The changes to the definition of a component will provide greater flexibility for the group auditor when identifying components. However, this may result in the entity’s management receiving requests for information regarding components that were not previously in scope. Risk-based approach One of the most significant changes in ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised is the alignment of the standard with the principles in ISA (Ireland) 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement.  This requires the group auditor to focus more on identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement at the group level when planning and performing the group audit, rather than simply defaulting to a full scope audit at the component level.  The alignment to ISA (Ireland) 315, and the requirement for the group auditor to take a more active role in identifying and assessing the risks of the material misstatement of group financial statements, will assist in improving audit quality.  It will also require more time, resources and effort on the part of the engagement team, however, and particularly the group engagement partner.  The group auditor will be heavily involved in identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement at the group level and planning the approach to the entire audit, rather than delegating this to the component auditor.  The additional time and effort required will be most evident in large groups with components in multiple locations. The entity’s management may also receive additional, or more granular, requests for information from either the group or component auditor to support the group auditor’s risk assessment procedures.  Communication and documentation ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised reinforces the need for two-way communication between the group auditor and component auditor to ensure that both parties are in sync.  The group and component auditor together comprise one engagement team, so a collaborative environment is essential. The revised standard also emphasises that all ISAs, including ISA (Ireland) 230 Audit Documentation, must be applied in a group audit.  In applying ISA (Ireland) 230, the group auditor must demonstrate in their documentation how they are directing, supervising and reviewing the component auditor’s work.  The group auditor must consider the scenarios where access to either individuals or information at the component auditor level is restricted and how these restrictions are overcome. Enhanced documentation and two-way communication from the beginning of the audit will improve audit quality.  However, it will also require more co-ordination and collaboration, which may be challenging, particularly for complex groups with many components.   Early communication will be essential to addressing the changes in scope, higher levels of group auditor involvement and in identifying any challenges to this involvement, including restrictions on sharing audit documentation electronically or at all, or restrictions on travel to a specific area.  To fulfil their supervisory role, the group auditor may need to navigate various obstacles, including different time zones and language barriers.  Other practical challenges may include how to ensure that component auditors are part of the discussions required by the other ISA (Ireland) standards, including the fraud discussion required by ISA (Ireland) 240. Professional scepticism The revised standard clarifies how the requirements in ISA 220 (Revised) Quality Control for an audit of financial statements – particularly the importance of professional scepticism – applies to achieving audit quality in a group audit.  The group auditor must exercise professional scepticism by remaining alert to inconsistent information from component auditors, component management and group management, regarding matters that may be significant to the group financial statements.  The group auditor must take appropriate actions when inconsistencies are identified. In addition, the group auditor must emphasise the importance of exercising professional scepticism to each of the engagement team members, including the component auditors.  Exercising professional scepticism at the component level may result in the group engagement partner needing to engage more extensively with component auditors and component management throughout the audit.  Crucial supervisory role The revisions to ISA (Ireland) 600 introduce more requirements for group auditors and their component auditors. This requires increased resources, enhanced communication, increased documentation and a greater emphasis on professional scepticism.  Audit committees and group and component management will also see an increase in the level or type of information required from the group or component auditor so that the group auditor can fulfil their requirements in accordance with ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised.  The need for greater group auditor involvement in the planning and risk assessment stages, and the two-way communication required, highlights the importance for all auditors to understand the new requirements and ensure that they have the skills and resources needed to meet them.  To align with the revised standard, group and component management may see a change in the type or nature of information requested by auditors.  The supervisory role the group auditor plays is crucial to the execution of high-quality group audits.  Both the group auditor and the component auditor will need to be familiar with the new requirements and align their audit methodologies accordingly, while group and component management should be willing to provide the additional information required by the auditor.  While the revisions to ISA (Ireland) 600 will undoubtedly increase the workload of both auditors and group and component management, it will result in higher quality audits. This will, in turn, generate greater benefits to the public interest and may avoid high-profile group audit failures in the future.   Noreen O’Halloran is Principle, Audit Quality and Professional Practice Department, KPMG Ireland

The CSRD has changed the sustainability outlook for SMEs reliant on business from larger entities in scope of the directive. Susan Rossney outlines what they can do now to keep ahead of the curve  Chartered Accountants Ireland is a global organisation with close to 33,000 members in positions of influence across society and the economy. With fewer than 250 employees, however, the Institute is also a small to medium-sized enterprise (SME). These SMEs are not often discussed in the context of climate change, but their combined carbon footprint is, on average, five times greater than that of their large corporate counterparts, according to CDP, the not-for-profit climate-disclosure organisation.  The European Commission estimates that SMEs contribute more than 60 percent of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced across Europe.   SMEs tend not to be at the forefront of sustainability discussions either, which have long been treated as the purview of larger accounting practices that have clients with sustainability reporting obligations.  This is expected to change with the implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which introduces an obligation on (mostly) larger businesses to report on the carbon emissions of their supply chain partners.  As part of this, the focus of attention has moved to the SMEs in these larger companies’ supply chains, caught in a so-called ‘trickle-down effect’. These small businesses are expected to find themselves asked by key customers for climate-related information, often for the first time, with the risk of losing valuable contracts if they fail to do so. Despite this, Irish businesses – particularly SMEs – were found to be reluctant or unable to decarbonise, with 86 percent of Irish businesses having no set commitments or targets to decarbonise, and just 11 percent measuring and tracking performance on total CO2e emissions, according to a 2022 study.  Chartered Accountants Ireland aims to provide leadership in this area for businesses in Ireland, first leading by example in our own SME operations. Here are some of the steps we have taken to act on our central ethos, “for tomorrow, for good”. In 2020, we kicked off an Environmental and Climate Impact Project (ECIP) focused on managing carbon emissions, resources (water, paper, catering supplies, etc.) and waste.  We commissioned an energy auditor registered by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland to carry out an internal energy audit for us, and we are working through their recommendations. Measures we have taken to reduce our carbon footprint include: Beginning the process of splitting our water and premises heating systems; Switching to light-emitting diode (LED) lights; Installing a roof net to prevent seagulls eating the insulation;  You can’t manage what you don’t measure, so in 2022, we invested in locally sourced emissions tracking software.  In 2022, we recorded a 13 percent decrease in carbon emissions on our 2021 baseline, and we recorded a 39 percent year-on-year reduction in carbon emissions at our Dublin headquarters in December 2023.   Similarly, there are many steps SMEs can take to reduce emissions and otherwise engage in sustainability practices. Our online Sustainability Centre signposts a variety of resources available to support businesses in these efforts.  Small steps make a big difference, but it’s a marathon not a sprint. My advice is start now, get help, measure – and keep going.  Susan Rossney is Sustainability Advocacy Manager with Chartered Accountants Ireland

Rory Mulvaney talks us through a multi-faceted career that has taken him from law to accountancy and on to entrepreneurship as the founder of his own corporate and compliance service firm  Belfast-born Rory Mulvaney, FCA, is founder and Managing Director of VANTRU, an independent provider of corporate and compliance services with a presence in Ireland, Britain and the Netherlands. Established in 2017 under the name Mulvaney, the company underwent a rebrand in 2023 to become VANTRU and employs a 20-strong team comprising accounting, tax and legal professionals. Here, Mulvaney tells Accountancy Ireland about the evolution of his career and path to entrepreneurship. Tell us a bit about yourself. Why you decided to become a Chartered Accountant? I was born in Belfast and my family then moved to Newry where I grew up and went to Abbey Grammar School. I now live in Rostrevor with my wife, Seana and our four children, Jack, Rory, Olivia and Charlie.   Starting out, I studied law at Queen’s University Belfast and, from there, undertook a Diploma in Legal Practice at the University of Law before joining Bank of Ireland and then McCartan Turkington & Breen in Belfast. At that stage, I decided that a career as a Chartered Accountant would give me the knowledge needed to one day become a business leader and I went on to train with John MacMahon & Co in Northern Ireland and undertook further training as a Tax Consultant with KPMG in Dublin. Looking back now, are you glad you made the decision to qualify as a Chartered Accountant?  Yes, absolutely! I wouldn’t say I had a career plan starting out, but I’m naturally ambitious and driven to succeed, so I always had a desire to do well and to do something meaningful with my life.  When I first decided to qualify as a Chartered Accountant, I could see that it would give me the freedom to work anywhere in the world for any type of organisation and possibly, one day, for myself.  After qualifying, I moved into industry with Bruce Shaw, now known as Linesight, a global cost management consultancy firm, where I was Group International Tax Manager for five years. What was it that prompted you to set up your own business? My first industry role with Bruce Shaw was inspirational. Working with a successful Irish business that was growing at pace and expanding overseas gave me confidence and a wealth of experience. In 2017, I decided to set up as a Corporate Service Provider (CSP) and established Mulvaney as part of Trustmoore, a global corporate services firm which had worked with Bruce Shaw on corporate services outside Ireland.  Trustmoore viewed Ireland and the UK as strategic jurisdictions for business growth. We established a two-year co-operation agreement after I pitched to the founders in Amsterdam in 2016. This was a pivotal moment in my career and a valuable opportunity to learn about the inner workings of the business. I was able to travel to global offices, attend internal academies and spend lots of time with Trustmoore’s founder and owners. Come March 2019, I established Mulvaney Corporate Services. I wanted to launch Northern Ireland’s first locally established, independently owned corporate services provider and to lead the market by providing a unique set of corporate and compliance services to foreign organisations across key jurisdictions. Today, we remain the first and only company of our kind in Northern Ireland. That makes me very proud. What prompted you to rebrand the business to VANTRU in 2023? We mainly service clients with foreign direct investment needs, both inward and outward, for trading and investment purposes, as well as clients in the capital markets space for whom Ireland is a relevant and attractive jurisdiction. As the company has grown, we have had opportunities to work with some high-profile global organisations and last year, seven years after our initial launch, I felt that the time was right to establish an identity and brand that would enable us to compete at the highest levels. What do you regard as your proudest achievements as a business owner? I am extremely proud of the fantastic team of qualified professionals who have chosen to work with VANTRU. It is also a massive achievement for me personally that VANTRU is recognised by many highly respected law firms, auditors, tax advisors and asset managers. We are in the very fortunate position of having financial institutions and CSP firms in other jurisdictions refer work on to us.  What are some of the most important lessons you have learned over the years?  Someone once told me: “people buy from people.” As a business owner, surrounding yourself with great people who can bring something unique to the table is key. In my wider career, I have had the privilege to work for and alongside people who have taught me valuable lessons. John MacMahon is a well-known Chartered Accountant from County Armagh who has built a fantastic all-island practice and property empire. John was always generous with his time, giving me plenty of valuable advice when I was starting out in my own career. Brendan O’Mara, Derry Scully and Gerard Campbell of Bruce Shaw also stand out. A natural entrepreneur, Brendan was the Founding Partner of Bruce Shaw in Dublin over 40 years ago.  Derry was the Group Chair during my time with the firm. He was both technically gifted and able to maintain a lot of key client relationships globally, including with some of the world’s biggest companies. I worked very closely with Gerry, as CEO, and learned a great deal from him also.  In my own journey, I have found myself adopting a lot of their habits, especially Gerry’s, with his little black books and knack for “getting things done”.  In the world of corporate services, I have learned a lot from two Dutchmen – Trustmoore founder Steven Melkman, who is an inspirational and charismatic leader, and Jan Jaap Kuipers, the former CEO of the BK Group.  Who do you most admire right now in business or public life? In business, it has to be Phil Knight, founder and former CEO of Nike Inc. I recently read his memoir, “Shoe Dog,” and was very inspired by his story. I found myself relating to his experiences, especially in the early days. In sport, despite being a Manchester United supporter, it has to be Pep Guardiola. I also read his biography, “Another Way of Winning,” by Guillem Balagué. Guardiola is so much more than just a football coach.  How has the role of the accountant evolved since you first joined the profession? The role of the accountant has been impacted by ongoing advances in technology, including the introduction of new and improved accounting software and cloud-based tools, which automate routine tasks such as bank reconciliations.  We are now also starting to see the impact of artificial intelligence, which will remove the need to carry out routine tasks for finance departments and accounting teams, such as data entry, reconciliations and generating reports.  The daily work patterns of accountants have also changed dramatically. At VANTRU, all of our employees have adopted hybrid working with some team members working remotely on a full-time basis. We recently hired a new team member who is based in Germany! There are many positives to this way of working for our business. We are moving towards a fully cloud-based business model, which will mean that we can hire people from anywhere in the world.   What are your plans for VANTRU in 2024 and beyond?  We have fulfilled most of the goals outlined in our 2019 business plan and we are in the process of agreeing our strategic plan for the next five years with the help of John-George Willis, our Non-Executive Director.   These plans will centre around improving our brand awareness, IT systems, processes and people. We will also consider growth by acquisition if the right opportunity arises.  Put simply, I want our company to continue to grow. I am very involved in developing new business opportunities and, every day, we talk to prospective clients from all over the world.  I am really looking forward to what we can achieve over the next decade.

A new report published by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment could hold the key to unlocking crucial capital for scaling Irish companies, writes Sarah-Jane Larkin The Irish Venture Capital Association welcomes the report, The Use of Finance as a Catalyst to Develop a Scaling Ecosystem, published recently by Peter Burke, FCA, TD, Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment.  This comprehensive report highlights the critical role access to finance plays in the growth and development of businesses in Ireland. We commend the government for its focus on enhancing financial support mechanisms to empower Irish enterprises to scale and compete on a global stage.  We are also pleased to see the commitment to establish an implementation committee to immediately start work on recommendations to help high potential start-ups access scaling finance.  The recommendation to investigate options for pension fund participation in scaling equity funds, and encourage corporate venturing in Ireland, is particularly welcome.  This report has been published at a time when Ireland’s economy stands as one of the most dynamic and robust in Europe, comparing favourably to other small, advanced economies worldwide.  However, it has become evident for Irish companies seeking larger rounds of capital that the dramatic transformation in our economic fortunes in the last 30 years cannot outrun the impact of our longer-term economic history.  The measures suggested in The Use of Finance as a Catalyst to Develop a Scaling Ecosystem, if implemented, would contribute to rectifying the deficits caused by this history.  Ireland’s economic history has been marked by periods of colonisation, famine and political upheaval. All have contributed to some of the financial challenges we now face in terms of the capital available to our SMEs today.  During British rule, Ireland’s economy was heavily controlled, leaving little room for the accumulation of private wealth. The Great Famine further decimated the population and weakened economic structures, leading to widespread poverty and emigration.  Up until the 1970s and in the early stages of the boom in foreign direct investment (FDI), Ireland remained largely agrarian.  Our relatively recent prosperity, rooted in an open FDI-oriented economy, has resulted in a shortfall in the institutional and corporate investment typically seen in other European countries.  Unlike other nations, Ireland did not undergo a transformative industrial revolution in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, nor have we had the same opportunity to create domestic multinationals or intergenerational wealth.  As a result, there are very few domestic multinationals in Ireland that typically deploy assets in domestic venture capital funds or direct investment in start-ups. Over the last 30 years, successive Irish governments have implemented various policies to address these challenges, such as encouraging entrepreneurship, providing grants and subsidies for small businesses, investing in education and innovation and seeding a domestic venture capital and private equity industry.  These measures have met with mixed success due to deep-rooted structural issues, however, and the lack of sources of private capital. What The Use of Finance as a Catalyst to Develop a Scaling Ecosystem shows is that, while Ireland’s economic history has been shaped by a persistent lack of private funds, understanding these historical and structural challenges is crucial in developing strategies to overcome them.  The report’s recommendations to incentivise pension funds to invest in growing Irish businesses could significantly boost the available capital.  By enacting the report’s recommendations and addressing these issues head-on, Ireland could build a more robust and self-sustaining economic future.   Sarah-Jane Larkin is Director General of the Irish Venture Capital Association *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

As the new Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society, Gillian Sadlier wants to demonstrate the many benefits a career in the profession can offer potential new entrants For Gillian Sadlier, the recently elected Chair of the Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society, attracting and retaining accountancy talent will be a key priority in the months ahead.  A Senior Manager with Bank of Ireland UK, Sadlier was elected as Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society at its 117th AGM held in Belfast on June 7. Taking office, Sadlier committed to advancing measures to address the skills shortage that is impacting the accountancy profession and wider economy in Northern Ireland.    It is a cause close to Sadlier’s heart, having trained as a Chartered Accountant with Coopers and Lybrand (now PwC) in the early nineties after graduating from Queen’s University Belfast with an economics degree. “I am immensely proud to be a Chartered Accountant and I feel hugely honoured and privileged to now hold the position of Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society,” Sadlier says. “My Dad always told me that accountancy was a solid career choice and maths was my first love at school, largely thanks to an inspirational teacher. I later found myself embarking on my Chartered journey when I started applying for jobs in the November of my final year of university and went on to train with Coopers and Lybrand in Belfast.” Having trained on the small business team at Coopers and Lybrand, Sadlier moved into audit and took the opportunity to relocate to the firm’s Singapore office on a three-month secondment. Already, she could see how building a career as a Chartered Accountant could open doors and enable mobility and opportunity on a global level. “The Chartered Accountancy designation offers a wide range of career benefits – that’s very clear to me. Most of my career has been spent working in roles that have required me to hold the qualification, or an equivalent,” she says. “Though I haven’t strayed too far from home, several of my peer group took advantage of the mobility offered by the qualification to progress their careers overseas in places like Australia, the US and the Cayman Islands.” In her own early career, Sadlier chose to leave Coopers and Lybrand to join ASM Chartered Accountants in 1996. After nine years with the firm and having risen to Director level working across accountancy, audit and corporate finance, she moved to Invest NI, Northern Ireland’s economic development agency. “I really enjoyed being involved in commercial due diligence work, which allowed me to get right ‘under the bonnet’ of a business, so when the opportunity arose shortly after the birth of my second child to join Invest NI as a Corporate Finance Executive, I took it,” she says.  Sadlier spent seven years with Invest NI, carrying out commercial appraisals across a wide range of businesses. “I was privileged to work with some of the largest and most successful indigenous businesses and inward investments in Northern Ireland, something I don’t think I would have experienced working elsewhere,” she says.   “In 2012, I joined Bank of Ireland as part of their ‘challenged’ team, spending two years working closely with a portfolio of business customers with stressed borrowing, before moving into the lending team in 2014.”   Sadlier moved to her current role as a Senior Manager at Bank of Ireland’s UK Chief Executive’s Office in 2021. “Based on my career experience alone, it’s clear that the skills required for, and developed through, the Chartered Accountancy qualification are highly transferable and can open doors to a very broad range of careers right across the public, private and third sectors.” It is this message that Sadlier is intent on imparting to younger generations during her term as Chair of Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society.  Against the backdrop of skills shortages in Northern Ireland, she will focus on the need to attract and retain accountancy talent, so that the profession can continue to support economic growth and development.  “Northern Ireland has so much economic potential, with unique access to Great Britain and EU markets, strong transport links with our neighbours, an educated workforce and a stable business environment,” she says. “However, the skills shortage affecting so many companies is threatening our ability to realise this economic potential.”  Recent research carried out for Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society found that three-in-five (61%) of member businesses and organisations are currently experiencing skill shortages, compared to 62 percent in 2022 and 48 percent pre-COVID.  Seventy-five percent of the Chartered Accountants Ireland Ulster Society members surveyed reported difficulty finding the right people for jobs in Northern Ireland. The same percentage said they expect the shortfall in skilled labour to negatively impact Northern Ireland’s economic performance in the year ahead. “My focus in the coming months will be on promoting Chartered Accountancy as a profession. I want to show potential new entrants to the profession just how varied and full of opportunity a career in accountancy can be and to demonstrate the reality that being a Chartered Accountant genuinely allows you to become a ‘difference maker,’” Sadlier says. This work will include engaging with second and third level students and working closely with trainees and young professionals to support them in the early stages of their careers.   “Our qualification is widely regarded as an indicator of a broad range of skills and attributes, including professionalism, analytical ability, technical capability and commercial acumen,” Sadlier says.  “Taken together with the mobility of the qualification, opportunities to develop personal and professional skills, pursue related specialisms and network effectively, the qualification really can open doors to endless career options.”

AI is revolutionising accountancy by automating routine tasks, enhancing data analysis and providing valuable insights for strategic decision-making. Conor Flanagan explains how Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force across various industries and accountancy is no exception. As AI technologies advance, they are reshaping the accounting landscape by enhancing efficiency, accuracy and strategic decision-making.  The emergence of AI can be traced back to the 1950s when pioneers like Alan Turing began exploring the concept of machine intelligence.  Turing’s famous “Turing Test” proposed that a machine could be considered intelligent if it could engage in conversation with a human without being distinguishable from a human interlocutor. Since the 1950s, AI has continued to evolve through different phases, including the notable period in the 1970s known as the “AI Winter” when there was a significant fall-off in funding and interest in the technology.  Since then, and coinciding with advances in computational power coupled with the development of machine learning algorithms, interest in AI has been reignited, with breakthroughs in natural language processing, computer vision and data analytics paving the way for more practical applications.  This progress, although impressive, has been somewhat dwarfed by the advent of Generative AI in recent years, with companies like OpenAI and its now infamous ChatGPT platform sparking widespread interest in the technology and its potential.  Generative AI has given rise to exciting new systems now capable of performing complex tasks, such as image recognition, language translation and content creation. And for the sceptics among us – no, this article was not written by ChatGPT. The Microsoft experience AI is revolutionising accountancy by automating routine tasks, enhancing data analysis and providing valuable insights for strategic decision-making. At the recent Chartered Accountant Technology Conference, held in January 2024, Daragh Hennelly, Senior Finance Director with Microsoft in Ireland, shared the story of how the company is unlocking business value through AI-enabled outcomes in finance. Microsoft began its AI journey over seven years ago, leveraging traditional AI to create models that could recognise patterns in data and use this to predict and act on potential outcomes, driving significant efficiency gains. Some examples include: Task automation and content creation Microsoft is using AI to automate tasks such as setting up purchase orders and logging expense reports. Streamlining processes and reducing risks Invoice approvals: AI assigns real-time risk scores to automate more than one million low-risk invoices and cuts the manual effort required for the rest by 50 percent, resulting in 125,000 hours of time saved for finance team members who can now use that time to focus on more strategic tasks. Journal entry anomaly detection: Machine learning algorithms have been built to review thousands of journal entries to detect anomalies with the aim of reducing reporting risks or misstatements.  Enhancing contract review efficiency: AI reads and scores thousands of contracts, reducing the time needed for manual review by 50 percent and allowing finance professionals to focus on high-risk contracts. The recurring theme in all these examples is how AI can be deployed to either automate manual tasks previously carried out by Microsoft’s finance team or unearth and present anomalies requiring additional review.  This demonstrates how AI can create efficiencies in finance functions and processes, but as accountants, we still need to be professionally trained to make decisions based on a smaller and more focused sample base.Over the past 18 months, in particular, the opportunity to transform business and finance processes has accelerated with the roll-out of Generative AI and its ability to create original content – such as text, images, video, audio or software code – in response to user prompts and requests. Today, Microsoft is adopting Generative AI to further enhance processes and unlock business value. This opportunity can be categorised across four main areas: Summarise information. Generate content. Recommend actions. Simplify tasks. 1. Summarise information Recap meeting transcripts to capture key points and assign actions. Distil collection agents’ call notes into actionable plans. Flag key terms in contracts related to payments, pricing and discounts. Synthesise complex workflow documents to highlight handoffs and commonalities. Summarise earnings scripts to identify significant trends and highlights. 2. Generate content Draft financial close decks and write analytical comments and insights. Write contractual language based on simple notes. Draft collection calls and follow-up emails in different languages with payment plan details. Write initial internal audit reports and investor relations earnings call scripts. Produce market sentiment analysis using transcripts from corporate earnings calls and central banking authorities. 3. Recommend actions Analyse financial close variances and recommend areas of the business to investigate variance drivers. Define collection strategy based on customer payment history. Evaluate audit workpapers and resolution disputes against audit controls.  Guide users in setting up purchase orders, invoices, expenses and payments. Recommend policy adherence within workflows. 4. Simplify tasks Accelerate financing requests by automating credit checks and policy reviews. Review sourcing contracts to ensure compliance and reduce human error.  Automate Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) operational controls and summarise insights. Prioritise collection emails, tag disputes and identify resolution owners. Streamline tax and customs procedures by identifying compliance obligations from different global jurisdictions. Central to the success of this transformation of finance at Microsoft is a strong culture of encouraging and rewarding employees to leverage new technologies to transform finance processes. As Amy Hood, Microsoft’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, puts it, “by adopting innovative technologies, finance will strengthen its business leadership through compliance, accuracy and efficiency.”   Microsoft is at the forefront of the Generative AI wave, advancing ideas of what is possible and investing in AI solutions such as CoPilot. CoPilot is integrated into Microsoft’s applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and Teams), working alongside the user with the aim of helping them to work more creatively and efficiently.  It is also enhancing business application products such as Power Platform, Business Central and Dynamics Sales, facilitating advanced data analytics and the creation of complex workflows using natural language that would previously have required the intervention of a developer.  AI’s other early adopters Outside Microsoft, there are other examples of organisations that have successfully implemented AI in their accounting processes, demonstrating the technology’s practical benefits in our field.  HSBC The multinational banking and financial services company has implemented AI to enhance its fraud detection capabilities. HSBC’s AI system analyses transaction data in real-time, identifying suspicious activities and flagging potential fraud cases. This has resulted in a substantial reduction in fraudulent transactions and improved security for customers. Xero The cloud-based accounting software provider uses AI to automate bookkeeping and financial reporting tasks for small and medium-sized businesses. Xero’s AI-driven platform can categorise transactions, reconcile bank statements and generate financial reports, saving time and reducing the risk of errors for business owners. AI and ethical risk While AI offers numerous benefits to the accounting profession, it also raises some ethical concerns. These issues must be carefully considered to ensure the responsible use of AI in accountancy. Data privacy and security AI systems rely on vast amounts of data to function effectively. This raises concerns about data privacy and security, as sensitive financial information may be at risk of unauthorised access or misuse. Organisations must implement robust data protection measures to safeguard against data breaches and ensure compliance with privacy regulations. Bias and fairness AI algorithms are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. If the training data contains biases, the AI system may produce biased or unfair outcomes. This is particularly concerning in areas such as fraud detection and financial forecasting, where biased algorithms could lead to discriminatory practices. It is essential to ensure that AI systems are trained on diverse and representative datasets to minimise bias and promote fairness. Transparency and accountability AI systems often operate as “black boxes,” making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their decisions. This lack of transparency can be problematic in the context of financial reporting and auditing, where accountability is crucial. Organisations must strive to develop explainable AI models that provide clear insights into their decision-making processes. AI and the work of the accountant The automation of routine accounting tasks through AI has raised concerns about job displacement and the future of the accounting profession.  While AI can handle repetitive and mundane tasks, it cannot replace the strategic thinking and judgment accountants bring to the table.  That said, accountants may need to adapt to new roles and develop new skills to remain relevant in an AI-driven landscape. Like electricity, the roll-out of AI will have a major impact on every industry and many professions, but only those who embrace it will learn to harness its power. Accountants must be prepared to adapt to the changing landscape by acquiring new skills and knowledge. Continuous learning and professional development will be essential for accountants to thrive in an AI-driven world. This includes gaining proficiency in data analytics, machine learning and other emerging technologies. Rather than viewing AI as a threat, accountants should embrace it as a valuable tool that can augment their capabilities. By leveraging AI to handle routine tasks, accountants can focus on higher-value activities, such as strategic planning, financial analysis and advisory services. AI is undeniably transforming the field of accountancy, offering numerous benefits in terms of efficiency, accuracy and strategic decision-making.  From automated data entry and fraud detection to financial forecasting and auditing, AI is revolutionising traditional accounting processes. Its widespread adoption also raises important ethical questions, however. To fully realise the potential of AI while addressing this challenge, organisations must prioritise ethical considerations while also investing in reskilling and upskilling their people and fostering collaboration between humans and AI.  By doing so, the accounting profession can harness the power of AI to drive innovation and deliver greater value to clients and stakeholders. If you have found this article interesting, join us for the next Chartered Accountants Ireland Technology Conference on Friday 24 January 2025. Conor Flanagan is ERP Lead with Storm Technology and a member of the Technology Committee of Chartered Accountants Ireland

The European Union’s new Artificial Intelligence Act brings opportunities for businesses but will not be without challenge, writes Keith Power Just seven percent of Irish businesses currently have governance structures in place for artificial intelligence (AI) or generative AI (GenAI). Despite this, the overwhelming majority (91%) believe that GenAI will increase cybersecurity risks in the year ahead. This is according to PwC’s latest GenAI Business Leaders survey, published in June 2024.  The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) is a sweeping new regulation aimed at ensuring that businesses have the appropriate AI governance and control mechanisms in place to deliver safe and secure outcomes.  Indeed, a large majority (84%) of our survey respondents welcomed the introduction of the EU AI Act, saying regulation is necessary to prevent the potential negative impact of AI in the future.  The new EU AI Act will also bring challenges, however. Its aim is to protect businesses, consumers and citizens in the EU from potential risks associated with AI in terms of health, safety, fundamental rights, democracy, rule of law and the environment.  By introducing standards and providing legal certainty, the Act also seeks to foster innovation, growth and competitiveness in the EU’s internal market.  It is the EU’s first comprehensive legal framework for AI and will level the playing field for businesses using the technology.  The Act adopts a risk-based approach, with its biggest compliance requirements applying to “high risk” AI systems.  These requirements include addressing data governance concerns, mitigating bias, ensuring transparency and implementing a system of quality management.  The Act also requires that users must be informed when they are interacting with chatbots, and that any AI-generated content must be clearly identifiable as such.   Several specific risks are particular to the EU AI Act, including failure to identify all uses of AI across a business as well as the potential for the inaccurate risk classification of AI uses.  The Act also obliges organisations to assess all of their use cases for AI. This may prove an onerous and time-consuming task given the dispersed nature of the use of AI in many companies. The risk of misclassification is high as risk classifications may change as an organisation’s use of AI evolves over time.  This necessitates the implementation of appropriate ongoing governance and control procedures to maintain compliance, bringing its own challenges. There is also a risk that the focus on compliance may lead to a drag on innovation.  The nuanced nature of some of the language used in the Act, coupled with risk classifications and role designations being subject to change, may prove problematic for some organisations.  The use of AI systems by third parties acting on behalf of organisations may also cause a degree of complexity.  There is much to be considered by Irish businesses to ensure they will be compliant with the new EU AI Act.  It will bring competitive opportunities, but complying with the new regulations will be a complex process. Keith Power is a Partner with PwC Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

Numra co-founder David Kearney, FCA, sees a world of potential in the advent of AI for accountants who can now expect to see their work move up the value chain David Kearney vividly recalls the release of the first version of ChatGPT, the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, by US tech firm OpenAI in November 2022. A Chartered Accountant, entrepreneur and self-confessed “techie,” Kearney had sold Peblo, his first start-up, just months earlier and was on the look-out for ideas for a new venture with global potential. “That first ChatGPT release was really the first time I’d come across the concept and capabilities of generative AI (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs),” Kearney says. “It was all I could think about at the time. I remember spending a full week of evenings staying up late just playing with ChatGPT, getting to know it, reading all about GenAI and LLMs and learning about how it all works. I was fascinated.” Almost immediately, based on his own experience as a Chartered Accountant, Kearney could see a potential commercial application for the technology in the professional field he was most familiar with. “There are literally dozens of use cases out there for GenAI. The one I zeroed in on was accountancy,” he explains.  Kearney established Numra in August 2023 and, alongside his co-founder Conor Digan, began to develop an AI-powered automation platform for finance teams.  Numra closed a €1.5 million seed funding round in December led by Elkstone Partners, the early-stage venture capital firm, and released the first version of “Mary,” its AI assistant for finance teams. Numra’s AI platform is aimed primarily at mid-sized companies with in-house finance teams processing high-volume transactions. “One of the biggest things Mary can help these teams with is workflow automation. She excels at repetitive tasks, such as invoice processing, three-way matching, payments and reconciliations,” Kearney explains. “If we take accounts payable as an example, Mary can identify an invoice from an email, extract the required invoice data and enter it into the accounting system. She can then send the invoice to whomever needs to approve it and, from there, she can execute the payment.” Kearney says Mary has been designed to behave like a “real-life team member.” She can be trained up on existing company processes and can interact with communication platforms already in use, such as email, Microsoft Teams and Slack.  “You onboard Mary, just like a normal team member. You train her on your internal processes, you give her access to your systems and then get her to start helping you with your workload,” he says. “She can manage complex tasks like answering vendor queries and performing detailed cost allocations, improving over time through user feedback. “That’s really the beauty of GenAI. It has this capability to ingest and process vast amounts of unstructured data and take on tasks that were previously too complex to automate.” The result, Kearney says, is that the role of the Chartered Accountant will be elevated with a new focus on higher-value activities that require strategic thinking and creativity. “There has been quite a lot of fear mongering around how AI is going to impact jobs in the future, including jobs in the accounting profession,” he says. “That’s kind of understandable, but AI actually represents more of an opportunity than a risk for accountants and other professions. I think it should be embraced.” Kearney began his own career as a Chartered Accountant as an undergraduate studying commerce at UCD. He undertook a one-year placement with PwC and went on to train in the firm’s audit department. “The Chartered Accountant qualification had been on my radar for a long time and I specialised in accounting in my final year at college to get the CAP1 exemption,” he explains. “I always had a very strong interest in business and entrepreneurship and I felt that the Chartered Accountant qualification would be a really good launchpad for my career. It’s very dynamic and it gives you a lot of career options.”  After qualifying, Kearney moved to southeastern Australia in 2018 where he spent three-and-a-half years in Melbourne working for large-scale organisations like PZ Cussons, RACV and National Australia Bank.  “I worked in finance departments, mainly in financial planning and analysis. I had an amazing time and built up some great experience in commercial roles, but it was always in the back of my mind that I wanted to do something for myself,” he says. After returning to Ireland with his partner Grace in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, Kearney hit upon the idea for Peblo, his first venture.  Peblo was a financing platform for content creators and influencers. Kearney established the start-up in late 2020 with co-founder Jake Browne and sold Peblo less than two years later to Wayflyer, the Irish-owned e-commerce funding platform. “Peblo was a bit of a crazy idea. It was an invoice factoring company for influencers and their talent agencies.  We were basically buying sponsorship invoices from influencers, so they could get paid sooner for sponsored work for brands. It took off. It grew legs really quickly and we sold in early 2022.” Peblo’s rapid growth and early acquisition was like “lightning in a bottle,” Kearney says now. “It’s rare enough that a start-up would scale that quickly and attract interest from a buyer,” he says. “It was good timing, a good value proposition. Sometimes things just work out.” Peblo may have taken off at lightning speed, but Kearney’s interest in technology goes right back to childhood. “One of my earliest memories is of my grandad’s Apple Macintosh computer. That was back in the early nineties. I was glued to the thing every time we visited and he ended up gifting it to me before I had even started primary school.  “I must have been about four and I still remember the excitement. Since then, I’ve been a bit of an early adopter of new technology. I love trying new things. Technology has always been a big part of my life.” Now, with Numra’s seed funding round secured, Kearney has ambitious plans for the fledgling venture. “We’ll use the funding to accelerate customer acquisition in the US and to invest further in product development,” he says. “Our main target market will be the finance teams in mid-sized organisations. These teams often have too much work and too few heads. They are the most likely to recognise, and benefit from, this kind of AI-enabled workflow automation from the get-go.” For Chartered Accountants fearful that the advent of such automated financial platforms could upend the profession, Kearney says the critical role the profession plays across all sectors will not be replaced. Rather, it will evolve. “The data entry, the document processing and the ‘number-crunching’ is going to go away. AI can do all of that better than we can,” he says. “AI is very good at doing a lot of the time-consuming work people don’t tend to enjoy and that is a positive for Chartered Accountants who can instead start to focus on more valuable strategic work. “Ultimately, I think we can expect to see the day-to-day work of Chartered Accountants move away from ‘the doing’ and more towards orchestrating and reviewing.”

Artificial intelligence is ushering in a new era of tech-enabled efficiency in many sectors, but its widespread adoption also throws up ethical dilemmas. Dr Susan McKeever digs into the details Dr. Susan McKeever is Head of Discipline for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Technological University Dublin’s School of Computer Science. Here, McKeever talks to Accountancy Ireland about the benefits AI is bringing to sectors reliant on data and how regulators, Chartered Accountants and other professions must ensure its ethical adoption as it continues to evolve at a rapid pace. How is the emergence of AI impacting the world of accounting and other professions and sectors? Any profession, function or industry reliant on large amounts of data and repetitive data-related tasks traditionally carried out by people will be impacted by the advent of AI, if they are not being impacted already. These repetitive tasks might involve data entry, data assessment and the generation of reports and correspondence based on this data. AI is very “friendly” to taking over these kinds of tasks. It is really good at getting to grips with a lot of data, interpreting and analysing this data and generating knowledge from it.  The medical sector is one example of an AI-friendly sector, as is the legal sector and insurance. Accountancy is, in a sense, data-driven, but uses a very specific kind of data that needs to be assessed and interpreted, so it is quite specialist.  You can train AI to do simple, repetitive, data-related tasks in accounting. It won’t get tired and it won’t forget what it has already learned.  You can continue to re-train AI as the world moves along, or as the situation changes, and it will continue to build on its existing knowledge and become more and more intelligent. People are excited about the emergence of AI, but also fearful – is this fear well-founded? One of the fears surrounding AI is the general concept that it will “take over” in certain fields. I do believe that the widespread uptake of AI across industries will displace certain kinds of repetitive jobs further down the value chain – the kind of roles that can easily be automated.  The silver lining – and I do truly believe this – is that, as a result, we will see an uptick in higher-value roles. If you take accountancy, we will likely see a shift away from the very granular, detail-driven examination of individual transactions, for example.  Instead, with AI gathering and analysing this data, the accountant will be able to focus on higher-value work, spotting interesting patterns or anomalies of immediate value to their organisation. My advice to accountants, as with all professions, is to go with it. AI is here to stay.  ChatGPT really seeded the concept of AI in the public imagination. It is just one of the larger language models out there, but it just happens to be the one that has really landed in the public consciousness. You have all sorts of people already using ChatGPT to write letters, draft CVs and so on. Change is inevitable. The widespread use of AI is inevitable. My advice to all professionals is to adapt and prepare. Re-train or upskill if you need to. Try not to resist it too much.  What else should we be concerned about when it comes to the widespread adoption of AI? There is a fear out there that AI will start to make decisions we, as humans, used to own.  What is really important here – and this needs to be enshrined in legislation – is that, at all times, humans must be responsible for any decisions made.  So, while AI may be by your side, acting as an “intelligent” support to you in your work as an accountant, you – the human – must always be responsible for any decisions made.  Once you move away from this principle, you enter problematic territory. AI must be accountable to humans. People must maintain ownership of any and all decisions made, always. We train AI based on existing data and data sets – does this carry its own risk? In AI, machine learning models are trained using previous examples. This subset of AI uses algorithms to interpret large amounts of data. It learns from experience. So, if you use a machine learning model to train an AI algorithm to recognise suspicious transactions, for example, you might give it a dataset of 1,000 transactions in which 100 are suspicious. The model will start to figure out the pattern of what makes a transaction suspicious where a human might not have been able to decipher the “rules” underpinning these suspicious transactions.  If you train your AI algorithm based on 1,000 transactions, it might get a certain level of detail. If you up this training to a larger dataset comprising 100,000 examples, your AI algorithm will start to get really good at recognising the patterns in suspicious transactions.  One issue with this kind of machine learning is bias. If you are training your AI algorithm on what has gone before, you are also embedding biases that have existed over time. You are enshrining the world as it is, or was, into the trained examples you use. You have to be very careful that you do this well.  Already, we have seen how the use of AI-driven CV evaluation systems has brought bias to the hiring process based on race, gender, age and other factors. It is something we need to be very aware of. Are we doing enough to regulate and legislate for the safe and ethical use of AI now and in the future? The effective regulation of AI is something I feel very strongly about. This technology, like so many others, is already shaping our society and will continue to do so in the future. Our legislation is lagging behind the rapid evolution and deployment of AI in Ireland and across the world. We are behind the wave, and this is a problem. In the European Union, the Digital Service Act came into full effect in February and the Artificial Intelligence Act is also coming down the line. Its aim is to ensure that AI systems placed on the European market, and used in the EU, are safe and respect fundamental rights and EU values. These regulations are welcome, but their introduction is too slow. It is not keeping pace with AI. Our legislators are falling behind, and this has to be addressed. Otherwise, we could be looking at a society that is framed by technology instead of the democratic and legislative code that should prevail. This is not to paint an entirely negative picture. AI can be used for so much good. There is so much to be positive about in this extraordinary technology. It is up to us to make sure that it is used for good, however, and that the necessary controls are in place to make sure that we continue to have the kind of society we want. To do this, the legislation needs to get in front of the technology, and this is something we need to prioritise today.