Members

Permanent TSB’s Norma Conway tells Accountancy Ireland why neurodiversity must be part of every organisation’s diversity, equity and inclusion strategy Employers who embrace neurodiversity stand to benefit from new ideas and fresh thinking that can boost the bottom line. So says Norma Conway, Diversity and Inclusion, Wellbeing and Engagement Manager with Permanent TSB. As Conway sees it, the neurodivergent community is currently a largely untapped resource for employers in Ireland, many of whom are unaware and unprepared for the strengths and capabilities this cohort can bring to the talent pool. “The benefits of neurodiversity are undeniable. Companies with neurodiversity programmes already in place report improved retention rates, reduced turnover and increased productivity and innovation,” Conways says. In “Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage”, an article published in The Harvard Review in 2017, for example, authors Robert D Austin and Gary P Pisanom reported that neurodiverse teams were 30 percent more productive than their neurotypical counterparts. Similarly, a still oft-quoted survey commissioned back in 2003 for the BBC series Mind of a Millionaire found that 40 percent of the UK’s self-made millionaires were dyslexic. Neurodiversity: what it means So, what is neurodiversity? The term was coined in the late nineties by Judy Singer, an Australian sociologist, to recognise that everyone’s brain develops in a unique way.  Harvard Health defines neurodiversity as, “the idea that people experience and interact with the world around them in many different ways; there is no one ‘right’ way of thinking, learning, and behaving, and differences are not viewed as deficits”. While Singer primarily views neurodiversity as a social justice movement, research and education in the area is also increasingly used by clinicians to understand numerous conditions, according to Harvard Health. These conditions range from autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to dyslexia, dyscalculia and dyspraxia. The upside for business For Conway, the benefits of these different ways of thinking are obvious for employers.  “Neurodivergent people bring a ‘business upside’ literally because they think differently,” she says. “In general, people with dyslexia are better at visual thinking and they are more creative. They have an approach to looking at data and problem-solving that I wouldn’t see myself.  “People with ADHD bring creativity, energy and passion. That’s built into the mindset of how they think and how they approach problems.” For employers, this can mean valuable access to better problem-solving capabilities and a more effective approach to strategising. “In most workplaces, we are generally trying to solve problems, improve things or find solutions, so having someone in the room who thinks differently automatically brings a new approach,” Conway says. “If you’re trying to brainstorm ideas and you bring someone into the mix who thinks differently, is more creative and asks questions nobody else is asking, the power in that is phenomenal.” Understanding and embracing neurodiversity in workplaces, schools and communities can also improve inclusivity for everyone, Conway adds.  “Every human is unique, with a unique combination of abilities and needs. Creating an environment that is helpful to neurodivergent people and that recognises everyone’s individual strengths and talents embraces this idea,” she says.  While she sees growing awareness of neurodiversity in society generally, Conway says the majority of employers continue to adopt a one-size-fits-all approach to recruiting, managing and supporting their employees.  “We have students in Ireland now receiving supports and accommodations throughout school and college, but they reach the workplace and hit immediate barriers as these supports and accommodations don’t exist in most companies,” she says. There is a “huge opportunity” here for employers to access a talent market that is thus far largely untapped, says Conway. The Same Chance Toolkit: A Step by Step Guide to Becoming an Autism Friendly Employer, published earlier this year by AsIAm, Ireland’s national autism charity, revealed that 85 percent of autistic individuals are either unemployed or underemployed.  “This is an opportunity for companies, not only to fill roles, but also to contribute to social justice and employment equity,” says Conway. The Permanent TSB experience As a large organisation employing 3,000 people nationwide, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DE&I) first became a key strategic priority for Permanent TSB back in 2017. Neurodiversity has been part of this strategy from day one and continues to evolve in line with developments in the wider world. “The focus on neurodiversity has changed in more recent years and there is an awareness that we need to do more, which has been captured as part of our latest DE&I Strategy for 2023 to 2025,” Conway says. “We now understand the complexities of neurodiversity, how neurodivergent colleagues are impacted by the work environment and the multiple potential business advantages to having diversity of thought in teams.” Ability is one of the main areas of focus in Permanent TSB’s DE&I strategy. “In May, we announced the establishment of our Ability Employee Resource Group (ERG) encompassing both physical ability and neurodiversity. We wanted to hear from colleagues and get their input as we plan to increase awareness and supports,” Conway says. “We’ve worked with the Trinity Centre for People with Intellectual Disabilities (TCPID) for a number of years and more recently we started working with Specialisterne (specialisterne.ie) and AsIAm (asiam.ie) to help understand what a positive experience should look like for candidates and colleagues when hiring neurodiverse talent.  “We have taken their advice on how we can improve our existing processes, onboarding and training and they have also helped us to understand accommodations that may be needed.”  AsIAm is currently working with Permanent TSB’s Digital and Direct Office teams on a sensory review of the banks’ premises and facilitating training for managers.  “It’s important that managers have a core understanding of the realities of neurodiversity and have the strategies needed to respond and take action,” Conway explains.  “Our first Ability ERG workshop will be facilitated in October by the Irish Centre for Diversity and, from there, we will have a clear plan of action based on our colleagues’ feedback and their needs.” Best practice advice for employers Based on her own experience with Permanent TSB, Conway’s advice for other employers is that supporting the needs of employees who are neurodivergent starts right at the beginning of the employment relationship – the recruitment stage. “Standard recruitment practices can be a barrier. Aptitude tests or complex job descriptions and formal interview processes can be challenging – so working with external experts who can advise on any adjustments needed has been a big help for our team,” she says.  Accommodations should be considered relative to the built environment, communications and sensory supports.  “Simple adjustments, such as the lightbulbs we use, or having a decompression room available away from the open-plan office space if needed, can make a difference,” Conway says. “We’re also in the process of rolling out Microsoft 365 and a team of neurodiverse colleagues and allies have worked with IT to ensure that all accessibility features are switched on for all colleagues.  “To complement this, we aim to introduce a support toolkit to include, for example, noise-cancelling headphones and screen readers colleagues can order online.”    Also key to supporting employees who are neurodivergent is buy-in and input right from the top of the organisation. “The support of our own leadership at Permanent TSB has been very important for us,” Conway explains. “It’s great to try to start initiatives and broaden communications and training but without their support – and a willingness to be visible in their support – it would be very challenging.” Start today: first steps  So, what are the first steps employers can take now to begin implementing a workforce strategy that encompasses neurodiversity? “First, listen to the experts,” Conway says. “There are many organisations out there that understand the complexities and supports needed that can guide you – they have the answers so ask for advice as you map out a plan.”  Second, listen to your employees. “Most people now have a personal interest in making the workplace more neurodiverse inclusive, whether it’s from their own perspective, a family member’s or a friend’s,” Conway says.  “Listening to these employees, encouraging them to share their stories and helping them shape your strategy will build trust that is invaluable.”    Ultimately, implementing a workforce strategy that accommodates neurodiversity benefits everyone, Conway says: “It has a knock-on effect on how we interact with each other, our openness with each other, and comfort in sharing information. It is well worth the effort.” Written by Tess Tattersall and Elaine O’Regan  

Ireland’s true gender pay gap will only emerge when SMEs begin reporting and now is the time for this crucial business cohort to start preparing, writes Padraic Hayes Dr BJ Fogg, a renowned behaviour scientist at Stanford University, postulates in his book Tiny Habits that small but frequent incremental changes are often the safest and most effective approach to delivering extraordinary results. One hopes this hypothesis will ring true for the SME sector when it comes to preparing for gender pay gap reporting.  The first gender pay gap reporting obligation came into force in 2022 for companies with over 250 employees.  This will extend to SMEs with over 150 employees next year and even further in 2025 when companies with over 50 employees will also be obligated to commence reporting their first gender pay gap. These milestones are very significant when you consider that, according to the most recent Central Statistics Office figures, SMEs with fewer than 250 employees make up 99.8 percent of active enterprises in Ireland and employ 68.4 percent of the workforce. Gender pay gap reporting thus far has only covered the other one percent of Irish enterprises. We can therefore infer that we have yet to see Ireland’s true gender pay gap figure.  As a result, SMEs are going to be in the full glare of both industry and the media once their first reports are published in 2024. This could be Ireland’s de-facto ‘silver bullet’ solution to truly move the needle on the gender pay gap.  What is the gender pay gap? There continues to be a lot of confusion surrounding what exactly the gender pay gap is. It is defined as the difference between the average hourly wage of men and women in the workplace.  The gender pay gap is an assessment of the gender representation of men and women at each level of an organisation characterised by the overall difference in their pay.  For example, how many males and females are in the top quartile of an organisation’s earners versus the lowest quartile – i.e. how well-represented are females by comparison to males?  It is important that the gender pay gap is not confused with “equal pay for equal work”, which is already a legal obligation for employers in Ireland.  The gender pay gap can be caused by a variety of factors such as unconscious bias, company policies or the division of caring responsibilities in the home. According to the United Nations, women worldwide earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by men.  This suggests that over their lifetime, women’s earning potential is significantly less, a staggering realisation in the modern age.  In Ireland, the gap stands at 11.3 percent, which is slightly more favourable than the EU average of 13 percent (Eurostat). This still equates to about one month a year when a woman essentially works for free. It is important to point out also that this is not just a ‘female’ issue, but an economic issue that affects us all. The reduced earning potential for females affects the overall household income.  It is common for women to find it more cost-effective to stay at home to offset childcare costs, for example, and this places downward pressure on household income in an escalating cost-of-living crisis, and thus the cycle repeats.  For this reason alone, we should all feel motivated to proactively figure out the root cause of this socio-economic issue and break the chain once and for all.  Who needs to report and when? Currently, the obligation to report remains solely on organisations with over 250 employees. The first gender pay gap reports were published in December 2022 and the second are due in December 2023. Next year, however, the obligation will extend to all employers with more than 150 employees. The employers will pick a ‘snapshot’ date in June 2024 and report their gender pay gap metrics for the previous 12 months.  Crucially, the employer will also be required to provide the underlying reason why the gender pay gap exists and, more importantly, what actions they are planning to take to rectify it.  Furthermore, they will need to publicly publish their report either on their website or on the government portal planned for introduction later this year.  As SMEs look ahead to this new landmark reporting requirement, they will be taking the steps needed to ensure they meet these first-time obligations. Here is my advice on the steps you should take and the pitfalls you will need to avoid. Challenges for SMEs  Data collection from disparate systems The gender pay gap report will require inputs from a range of data sources. It is rare for any organisation, no matter what size, to be in a position to extract the data they need from a single source. Finance, payroll and HR systems are disparate in nature and contain data of differing quality. This challenge is amplified where spreadsheets persist in place of systems as the book of record. It can be time-consuming and challenging for non-technical users to extract, organise combine and compare this data and significant effort may be required to cleanse existing datasets in preparation for reporting.  Resourcing The amount of time and effort required to complete the gender pay gap report will be significant – it should not be underestimated. For SMEs, this could prove especially challenging because they are more likely to need to divert attention away from regular activities in situations where there is no dedicated reporting team. This may be especially challenging for the leadership team, who will be required to input into the report and sign it off. All of this increases the risk of introducing ‘bias’, akin to someone correcting their own homework so to speak, which you should avoid at all costs. Availability of expertise  Smaller organisations are highly unlikely to have access to the broad range of expertise needed to complete the gender pay gap report. To create a detailed report requires independent expert skills from a range of disciplines such as data analytics, visualisation and organisational change specialists.  Navigating legislative nuances The guidance in relation to how to report has evolved since the initial introduction of gender pay gap reporting. While many issues have been ironed out through the FAQs available on the government website (gov.ie), there are still nuances in the preparation of the report. My advice is to carefully study the available guidance to ensure you are compliant.  Comparing results While many organisations will be tempted to compare and contrast how they ‘measure up’ against their peers, it is worth bearing in mind that there is no right or wrong answer per se. The gender pay gap is a broad, multifaceted and pervasive issue that goes far beyond the numbers. Focus instead on assessing and improving the aspects of your own company practices, policies and culture that influence the gender pay gap – and your gender pay gap result will follow.  Best practice recommendations for SMEs Fail to prepare, prepare to fail It is important to be prepared for the questions you may get from your employees once your gender pay gap report is published. It is critical that you communicate the result of the report and ensure they fully understand what the data is saying and, more importantly, what it is not saying. It is very common for people to misunderstand the metrics contained in the gender pay gap report. As they say, good news travels fast, but bad news travels twice as fast – lead the narrative. Action planning In your final report, you need to provide a list of actions that you are going to follow to improve your gender pay gap in the 12 months ahead. Set goals for the next year in your report using the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Time-Bound) technique. It is worth noting again here the importance of focusing on your company practices, policies and culture – and take advantage of the opportunity for a yearly reset. Remember, “what gets measured gets done”.   Get help early on I cannot overstate this enough: get help early on. The requirements of your gender pay gap report may look straightforward at the outset, but do not be fooled.  Preparing such a report can be a time-consuming and intricate process requiring expertise in both data analytics and visualisation and organisational psychology, which together provide a complete assessment.  Moreover, significant input from departments and teams across the organisation will also be needed – typically human resources, finance and payroll, and senior management.  Final word Numerous organisations have come to us seeking help having realised just how complex preparing a gender pay gap report can be.  The best approach is to view it as an in-depth reporting process akin to an annual audit of your workforce analytics, practices, policies and culture.  Padraic Hayes is an Associate Director on Grant Thornton’s digital transformation advisory team and heads the firm’s gender pay gap service offering

Ronan McGovern, FCA, barrister and Stanford Scholar, talks about his experience living with ADHD and why more support is needed for neurodiversity at work  He is a Chartered Accountant, barrister and strategy manager with one of Ireland’s biggest banks but, for Ronan McGovern, the title he is most proud of is Stanford University Scholar. It was while studying for his MBA at the prestigious US university in 1996 that McGovern was first diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). And it was through his continued work with Stanford that McGovern would go on to discover what he calls his “life purpose”. “In 2019, I was invited to work for six months on the Stanford Neurodiversity Project at Stanford Medical School, and it changed my life,” he explains.  “I discovered my unique offering to the world – what I was put on this earth to do; to be a neurodiversity champion and innovator.” His path to learning he had ADHD and discovering the world of neurodiversity was a long one, however. McGovern was already well into his thirties by the time he received his diagnosis. Although, these days, he views ADHD as the fuel powering “all the amazing things I have done in my life”, his experience growing up with the condition was not always positive. “I have been given these amazing gifts – academic excellence, creativity, ideas, energy, productivity – I stand out and I am authentically myself. I think differently but thinking differently wasn’t a good thing in the Ireland I grew up in,” he says. “In Irish society in the sixties and seventies, there was a very homogenous culture. Being different generally meant you were punished.” Early years McGovern grew up in the west Dublin suburb of Palmerstown and started primary school in 1965.  “It was long before there was any recognition of neurodiversity and I have to say I learned very little because my mind was always wandering,” he says. “Everybody’s mind wanders, but for an ADHD person, the inattention and mind-wandering are pronounced. The teachers had no idea I wasn’t learning anything. I just basically sat in class not telling them.” By the time he was ready to progress to secondary school in 1975, corporal punishment was still very much part of “the school culture” in Ireland, McGovern says.  “Some teachers saw me as what, in those days, they might have called a ‘a bold boy’, disrupting the class and with no apparent interest in learning,” he reflects. “During my time at secondary school, I would say corporal punishment was used on me maybe four or five times more often than my peers. “There was also shaming of different descriptions – I remember being put outside the door of the classroom as punishment – but that kind of treatment wasn’t exclusive to my secondary school at that time.” Despite this, McGovern’s academic performance remained strong throughout his school years with his exam results “ranging from average to top of the class”. “I believed in myself,” he says now. “Sometimes I was made to feel ‘less than’; I was shamed and ridiculed for being honest and straightforward, but throughout it all, I always believed in myself.” Path to diagnosis After leaving school, McGovern went on to train with a small accountancy practice and joined PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Dublin office in the early eighties. “In 1993, I was accepted into the MBA programme at Stanford Business School. The tuition at that time was about €30,000 per quarter so I decided to apply for a transfer to PwC New York for the sole reason of earning the money I would need to join the Stanford programme,” he says.  McGovern began his MBA studies in 1995 and was about eight months in when he was approached one day by one of his classmates.  “She said to me, ‘Ronan, I want to ask you a question. Have you ever heard of ADHD?’ I said no. She explained the condition and said that she had been watching me in class and believed I may have it,” he explains. “She was a doctor, and she knew a lot about autism and ADHD. She gave me a reference to the Stanford Medical Centre and told me they would point me in the direction of an educational psychologist who could assess me.”  Following a 10-hour assessment by an educational psychologist in Palo Alto, McGovern received a 15-page report.  “It told me that I had what was called Combined ADHD; a combination of hyperactivity and inattention. That was in early June 1996,” he says. “At the time, I felt a bit of sadness over the fact that I had not been diagnosed earlier, but I also felt a bit of relief and then excitement. My final observation was: Let me see what I can do in the future now that I have this diagnosis.” In the years since, McGovern has come to view his ADHD as “a gift”. “I bring creativity and ideas to the table,” he says, “an understanding of how everything is connected, be it biology, business or machine learning. That has really stood to me in my life and work.” Stanford Neurodiversity Project McGovern took a six-month career sabbatical in 2019 and returned to California to take part in the Stanford Medical School Neurodiversity Project. Led by Dr Lawrence Fung, the aims of the Stanford Neurodiversity Project include maximising the potential of neurodiversity and establishing a culture that treasures the strengths of neurodiverse individuals.  It defines neurodiversity as “a concept that regards individuals with differences in brain function and behavioural traits as part of normal variation in the human population” and says, “the movement of neurodiversity is about uncovering the strengths of neurodiverse individuals and utilising their talents to increase the innovation and productivity of society as a whole”. Following his six-month stint on the neurodiversity project, McGovern took part in Stanford Rebuild Innovation Sprint, launched in 2020 to help develop solutions for the challenges and opportunities society would face in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. “Stanford invited alums and others to initiate an entrepreneurial project aimed at rebuilding society,” he explains. “Professors gave their time to assist volunteers and I volunteered to do something on neurodiversity in business and formed a core team with Susan O’Malley, an Irish Stanford business school alum, and Tiffany Jameson, a neurodiversity consultant.  The group recruited 50 other volunteers and, “over three months in the summer of 2020, we all co-authored our Stanford Rebuild Report,” McGovern says. “When our Rebuild project drew to a close that August, we formed NDGiFTS to prevent this work coming to an end.” NDGiFTS stands for Neurodiversity Giving Individuals Full Team Success and is, McGovern explains, a movement dedicated to building a “global community whose aim is to increase the inclusion and celebration of neurodiversity at work”.  To this end, NDGiFTS has produced a 78-page report, available at ndgiftsmovement.com, with input from 70 contributors and insights from 300 stakeholders worldwide. NDGiFTS’ mission “The mission of the NDGiFTS movement is to prove that neurodiverse individuals are worth investment from organisations who stand to reap the reward of innovation,” McGovern says. “Our core belief is that the neurodivergent individual, when appropriately supported and embraced, brings cultural and economic advantages to the workplace, including creativity, innovation and entrepreneurial energy.”  According to McGovern, as many as 20 percent of people worldwide have neurodivergent conditions ranging from ADHD and autism spectrum disorder to dyslexia, dyscalculia and dysgraphia. “Even now, all these years since my diagnosis, the sad truth is that society has not yet built the structures to support and service people who are neurodiverse,” he says. “This applies as much to the business environment, apart from a very small minority of companies, Goldman Sachs being a particular exception to the rule.” In 2019, the US banking giant launched the Goldman Sachs Neurodiversity Hiring Initiative, an eight-week paid internship for people who identify as neurodiverse. “It went on to hire more than 50 neurodivergent people over three years. Every one of the participants in that internship programme was made a permanent employee,” McGovern says. As it stands, however, Goldman Sachs remains the outlier with few organisations having made the same strides in neurodiversity inclusivity. McGovern is, meanwhile, once again partnering with Stanford University to publish a book in 2024 that will detail his experiences growing up and living with ADHD. “My own experience of work was that my experience at school carried through to my professional life. When I was challenged to progress in a certain role, I found the perception was that I didn’t fit the mould of my other colleagues,” he says. “My message now is that we need to focus on the intentional recruitment of the neurodiverse talent base, similar to the Goldman Sachs model. “I would like employers to look at my personal journey and start thinking seriously about neurodiversity and the potential of people like me.  “My story is not unique, but I think I can help to open a serious conversation about neurodiversity in Ireland and around the world. We should not have a society where people spend all their time swimming against the tide.” Written by Elaine O’Regan

Accountants will be the profession best placed to bring the necessary rigour to the analysis and governance of critical data in the age of AI, writes Sharon Cotter Canadian philosopher Marshall McLuhan has suggested: “We become what we behold. We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us”. This is important to remember today, when the spotlight is on the potential consequences, intended and unintended, of the artificial intelligence (AI) tools being shaped by humans. The rise of AI AI encompasses a vast range of computer science research. Since the 1950s, scientists have pursued the goal of building machines capable of completing tasks that normally require intelligent human behaviour.  Machine learning (ML), a subset of AI, enables machines to extract knowledge from data and to learn from it autonomously.  In the past decade, the exponential increase in the volume of data generated, captured, stored and available for analysis, coupled with advances in computing power, have created the impetus and means to rapidly advance ML, which in turn has facilitated the development of narrow AI applications.  In essence, narrow AI applications are computer programs, or algorithms, specifically trained, using very large datasets, to carry out one task, or a limited number of tasks. Best suited to tasks that do not require complex thought, narrow AI algorithms can often accomplish such tasks better and more swiftly than humans.  Most of the AI capability we use today is narrow AI – from Alexa and Siri, which carry out human voice commands, to ChatGPT and Bard, which generate output based on conversational text prompts, and Dall-E2, which generates visual images based on text prompts, to name but a few.  In the field of accounting, we can utilise coding languages and software tools such as Python, ‘R’ and Alteryx to generate predictive forecasts and models.  We often use these tools without realising that we are using elements of narrow AI. For example, these programming languages and software tools embed many of the statistical algorithms that allow us to easily carry out linear regression analysis, a common method of predicting future outcomes based on past data. Adapting to broaden our role The word ‘computer’ was first coined by the English poet Richard Brathwaite in 1613 to describe a person who carried out calculations or computations. For the next 350 years or so, most humans who needed to perform calculations used mental arithmetic, an abacus or slide rules until the widespread availability of electronic handheld calculators in the 1970s. As accountants, we have seamlessly adapted to the tools available to us – whether these are an abacus, double-analysis paper, a totting machine, or computer software tools like Excel and Alteryx.   The use of these tools, and the time saved by their use, have allowed us to broaden our role from recording, summarising and presenting the underlying economic transactions to providing a much wider range of useful information to decision-makers both within, and outside, organisations.  This is reflected in commentary from the professional accountancy bodies emphasising the importance of good organisational decision-making and suggesting that the core purpose of our profession should be to facilitate better decisions and identify the business problems that better decisions will resolve. Asking the right questions In 1968, Pablo Picasso is reputed to have said: “Computers are useless. They can only give you answers”. While the remark may have been dismissive of the then cumbersome mainframe computer, it does encapsulate the notion that the real skill lies in figuring out the right question to ask, as this requires both judgement and creativity.  Useful, timely and relevant information for decision-making can only be produced if the right question is asked of the right data at the right time. On the face of it, this seems simple and straightforward, but in practice it is often much more difficult to achieve.  Deciding what question to ask requires knowledge of the business context, and an understanding of the issue being addressed as well as an ability to clearly articulate the issue. Critical thinking is key to identifying what answers are needed to identify the range of solutions for the issue at hand. Deciding what data is appropriate to use in the analysis requires an understanding of what data is available, where it is stored, how it is stored, what each data element selected represents, how compatible it is with other data, and how current that data is. It also requires knowledge of the limitations posed by using particular sets of data. Being able to generate the answer to the right question using the right data is only relevant if it can be produced at the point at which this information is needed. Sometimes, not all the data needed to answer the question is readily available, or available in the required format. Data from several sources may need to be combined and, where data is incomplete, judgement will be needed on the assumptions necessary to generate a relevant and timely set of data. Accountants are well-positioned The skills, experience and mindsets we develop as part of our professional training positions accountants well to provide the best possible decision-enabling information to decision-makers.  Scepticism is a key tenet of our profession. We look to spot anomalies in data and information, and to question the information by asking “does it make sense?” We are trained to be methodical, thorough and to look beyond the obvious. Training and experience enable us to develop our professional judgement, which we apply when determining what is relevant, appropriate and faithfully represents the underlying economic transactions.  We are adaptable and flexible in the tools we use, and aware of the need to stay up to date with the law and regulation applying to the storage and use of data. In short, we are valued problem-solvers and critical thinkers. Accountants’ ‘jurisdiction’ In his book The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, Andrew Abbott uses the term ‘jurisdiction’ to represent the link between a profession and its work.  Jurisdiction is an important concept, as the acknowledged owner of a task is likely to be able to shape the characteristics of that task. In the context of accountants’ work, the term ‘jurisdiction’ means the extent to which organisations, and society, accept that due to their professional expertise, only specific roles and responsibilities should be carried out by accountants.  Within organisations, accountants’ jurisdiction is not static. The roles and responsibilities that fall within their remit can, and do, change.  The jurisdiction of accountants can be encroached upon. Others within the organisation may also have expertise allowing them to claim work once exclusively identified with accountants. Challenges to jurisdiction The emergence of new roles, such as data or information specialists, who collect, clean and analyse data, has meant that complex analysis of financial information can now be done by non-accountants.  Some organisations have explored ways in which operational managers and decision-makers can be given direct access to financial systems.  Known as ‘self-service’ menus, such direct access to information allows decision-makers to drill down into the detail of transactions – for example, to identify the underlying causes of deviations from budget, all without the need to consult with their colleagues in the finance department.  If an organisation transfers responsibility for data analysis and decision support to data specialists and/or decision-makers, then the jurisdiction of the accountant may be narrowed or reduced. Opportunities for role expansion Equally, however, accountants’ roles and responsibilities can be increased, resulting in their jurisdiction being broadened or expanded.  The expansion of an accountant’s role requirements can either result from increased job tasks and responsibilities, or from changes in the tools and technologies available to carry out these tasks and responsibilities.  Recent research and professional body commentary has, for example, explored the extent to which management accountants have embraced changes in their role or taken on wider responsibilities, such as business partnering.  Multiple elements such as role identity, the ability to embrace change in a positive way and developing strong communication skills, to name but a few, all contribute to the successful adoption of additional responsibility. Futureproofing with digital fluency The rapid and on-going development, enhancement and availability of software tools that can be used to capture, store, identify, slice and dice data, and present information in visual graphics, are forcing accounting professionals to consider the level of IT competency required to operate efficiently and effectively in today’s digital world.   Professional accountancy bodies emphasise the importance of digital skills in futureproofing the accountant’s role while many of the larger multinational companies espouse the need for finance staff to have good digital fluency. Challenges and opportunities Both encroachments and expansions to the jurisdiction of accountants bring their own set of challenges and opportunities.  Maintaining, and expanding, accountants’ jurisdiction over the integrity of data, and the provision of information for decision-making, should be a key part of the profession’s strategy in the digital age.  I believe that the ‘governance’ of data, rather than the use of specific AI tools, should be the focus of the accountancy profession when formulating strategies for its future direction. In addition to enhancing our digital skills, we need to consider strategies such as adapting and changing the role of the chief financial officer to include overall direct responsibility for data analytics.  The governance, management and analysis of data should be as important as traditional responsibilities in finance.  Governance of data requires rigour and objectivity to ensure that its integrity is preserved. We should noticeably stake our claim as the profession best placed to bring that rigour and objectivity to the governance and analysis of data used for decision-making.  Failure to consider such strategies may mean we increase the risk that encroachments rather than expansions to our role – our jurisdiction – will become a reality. We should strive to ensure that our future role is shaped by us rather than by these new digital tools and techniques. Sharon Cotter, FCA, lectures in accounting and finance at the University of Galway

Exam prep, study and practising in exam-day conditions are all important to acing your exams. Caelainn McGonigle knows it's important to take care of yourself, as well During your Chartered education, stress is unavoidable. When you experience high levels of stress, it can present itself by impacting physical and mental health.  Below are several steps to mitigate these stressors and give ourselves the best opportunity to excel when it counts. Sleep When we are stressed, it's easy to think of sleep as “time-consuming”, but allowing our mind and body to rest is critical to our success.  By the time we reach exam week, countless hours will have been spent preparing by attending lectures, revising notes and attempting sample papers. Without achieving seven to nine quality hours of sleep a night, we risk restricting our exam performance on the day.  If you encounter difficulties resting in the lead up to your exams, attempt to close the books an hour earlier and reduce screen time before bed. Exercise and fresh air Taking a break to move your body and relish the fresh air enables your mind and body to relax and reset.  Exercise, whether walking, running or cycling, can moderate our stress levels and improve sleep quality.  When heading outside, you might prefer to enjoy the silence of the outdoors, or need a little motivation to move your body, such as listening to a podcast or music – either is excellent for your mind and body as long as you are getting your heart pumping. Nutrition Maintaining nutritional balance in your meals can be taxing when stressed. It can lead us to over-indulge in meals and snacks, or forgo them all together. We must uphold a nutritious diet to aid focus levels and sustain energy.  Meal planning in advance of high-stress periods, like exam week, along with keeping enjoyable snacks to hand, is a sure way to remain fuelled when working hard.  Positive mindset during exams Stress can amplify our emotions. Preserving a positive mindset and prioritising being gentle with ourselves is critical.  It's important to remember the efforts you have made to reach exam season. The groundwork is complete, and it’s time to flaunt what we have learned.  Exams are important, but maintaining our health is a necessity. If you struggle with positivity, try subscribing to a “quote of the day” app or social media page – it may give you the boost you need at just the right time! Reach out If stress is increasing faster than you can handle, reach out to a fellow student, friend or family member.  Alternatively, the amazing Thrive team and the Chartered Accountants Ireland Wellbeing Hub are on hand to offer help and support throughout our journey.  We have excelled through stressful situations in the past. Accept that stress is unavoidable but manageable, and you haven’t come this far only to come this far. Caelainn McGonigle is PR Officer with CASSI and a trainee with Gilroy Gannon

As we approach the final months of 2023, three Chartered Accountants take a moment to contemplate the hurdles Ireland has surmounted and share their aspirations for the remainder of the year Sinéad Nolan Financial Accountant AXA Insurance The economy is fine on paper (GDP and domestically); however, housing is a major issue, in both affordability and availability. The cost-of-living crisis is only exacerbating a problem that was already there for young professionals starting off their careers. Paying rent is a continuous challenge, as is looking for an affordable house to purchase. The interest rates keep rising, and house prices don’t seem to be reducing. Many in the country felt the challenge of paying bills in the wintertime. On top of that, there has been a lot of uncertainty with the war in Ukraine.  On the plus side, there has recently been slight moderation in the price of energy and in inflation, and the pleasant weather in June was a bonus! (Less pleasant in July, admittedly.) Also, the unemployment rate in the Republic of Ireland fell to a record low of 3.8 percent in May. To help, my employer has hosted many financial wellness webinars, which, given the current economic crisis, have been great.  We also received a well-being day off, not to mention personal interaction is happening in the office again – we are attending social events, which is brilliant.  As for the rest of the year, I hope the housing crisis settles, and there is more support given to first-time house buyers from the Government. I joined the Young Professionals Committee in July after attending the wonderful Pride BBQ in June. I am looking forward to organising and hosting events, and connecting with other members of the Institute. The Young Professionals Committee is a great networking platform, so I am very excited to get stuck in with it. Jim Stafford Consultant Friel Stafford I work every day at the coalface, advising companies and individuals who are dealing with financial challenges, and thus I appreciate the issues facing the economy.  While there is an economic brew of uncertainty caused by inflation, geopolitical issues, etc., the biggest impact we have seen this year has been the dramatic increase in interest rates, which has shaken some people to the core.  We have observed a noticeable increase in Members Voluntary Liquidations from businesspeople who are deciding to ‘cash in their chips’ now rather than face future uncertainty.   One of the positives that I have always enjoyed when working with people under financial pressure is recognising the levels of resilience people have. On the ‘resilience spectrum’, I am delighted to see some clients who bounce back stronger than ever.   The highlight for me personally this year was the sale of Friel Stafford to Ifac, which will enable us to provide restructuring services such as the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP) across Ifac’s 30+ offices.  The association with Ifac has moved us into the top ten accountancy firms in Ireland, which has opened the doors to certain types of work, making it easier for us to attract and retain talent.  A big development during the year was the growth of artificial intelligence (AI). While there is great potential for generative AI to change the workplace, there is also huge scope for more sophisticated fraud.  Looking to the year ahead, a big challenge for some businesses will be the ending of the Revenue warehousing scheme, which was a valuable lifeline for many.  We expect to see an increased number of SCARPs next year.  Another big challenge for some firms will be the Companies Registration Office and the Corporate Enforcement Authority increasing their enforcement activity on companies that are struck off. Gordon Naughton  Chief Executive Officer Tactive   January represented a strange and uncertain time for the Irish and global economy. Many initiatives were placed on hiatus due to significant inflationary, economic and geopolitical concerns.  In January, it was startling to see how quickly the mood had shifted from November and December. Since then, the business community and consumers have learned to live with these concerns and are in a positive state of mind.  Currently, the Irish economy is showing tremendous resilience, with the overall tax intake and consumer spending being unexpectedly high. It seems the country is forging ahead. However, if the past three years are a barometer for future challenges, predicted and day-to-day issues tend to be easy to deal with. It’s the unpredicted challenges that can pose the most difficulty.  My key lesson from this period is that businesses need to be agile, efficient and have contingency plans for the three main ways an economy can move – up, down or steady on.  Luckily, I have great clients, a good support structure and network that has brought me through any uncertainty. I am so lucky to work from home and spend time with my wonderful family.  Continuous learning is a facet of my life, as I simply like reading and expanding my knowledge. This year I obtained a black belt in Lean, which has helped me professionally and personally.  As for the rest of 2023, I hope to continue to work with outstanding clients.   

The Digital Services Act aims to better protect users in the online world, but its requirements will impose many new obligations on service providers, say Mary Loughney, Shane O’Neill and Filipa Sequeira The increased use of digital technology dramatically raises the chances of end users being exposed to illegal or harmful online content. Regulations and laws are catching up with the fast-paced world of emerging digital services and online platforms to ensure online services’ security, accountability and openness.  The Digital Services Act (DSA), an EU regulation, aims to modernise the digital landscape and defend users’ rights. What digital services does the DSA cover? The DSA encompasses a broad range of online intermediaries, including internet service providers, cloud services, messaging platforms, marketplaces and social networks.  Hosting services, such as online platforms (a hosting service provider that “stores and disseminates to the public information, unless that activity is a minor or purely secondary feature of another service”), social networks, content-sharing platforms, online marketplaces and travel/accommodation platforms, have specific due diligence obligations.  The DSA’s most significant regulations target very large online platforms, with a substantial societal and economic impact reaching a minimum of 45 million EU users, representing 10 percent of the population.  Similarly, very large online search engines with over 10 percent of the EU’s 450 million consumers will have greater responsibility for combating illegal content on the internet. Key provisions of the DSA The DSA outlines specific responsibilities for online platforms, including big platforms, intermediaries and hosting service providers.  Due to their significant societal impact, the Act introduces categories called Very Large Online Platforms (VLOP) and Very Large Online Search Engines (VLOSE), which are subject to stricter regulations and audit requirements.  An independent audit must cover all the obligations imposed on VLOPs and VLOSEs by the DSA, including the duties to remove illegal content, provide users with transparency about how their data is used and prevent the spread of disinformation.  The following focus areas are central to the DSA’s requirements: Due diligence around safety and content moderation: The DSA lays out guidelines to address illegal content, such as hate speech, terrorist propaganda and fake goods. Online platforms must set up efficient content moderation systems and offer ways for users to report unlawful content. This may involve using automated tools for detection and removal. User rights and transparency about terms of service, consent, algorithms and advertising practices: Companies must offer more transparency about how their platforms operate, including their terms of service, algorithms and advertising practices. This will help users to understand how their data is being used. Users’ ability to control their privacy settings and flag harmful content: Companies must provide users with tools to manage their privacy settings and flag harmful content. This will help users to protect their personal data and keep themselves safe online. Companies are also required to respond to flagged content within a reasonable timeframe. Measures to prevent the spread of disinformation: Companies must take steps to prevent the spread of disinformation, such as by labelling sponsored content and providing users with access to reliable information. This may involve working with fact-checking organisations or other companies to share information about disinformation. Accountability for the content hosted on platforms: Companies must be accountable for the content hosted on their platforms. This means they must be able to remove illegal content promptly and co-operate with law enforcement authorities. With these provisions in mind, a sensible place to begin your journey may involve conducting a maturity assessment using a risk-based approach so the organisation is aware of the risks that require mitigation: Maturity assessment: The risk assessment should consider a range of factors, such as the nature of the platform, the type of content hosted and the potential for harm to users. Address DSA requirement gaps: As a result of the risk assessment, organisations should identify their exposed risks and implement necessary measures, which include enhancing content moderation tooling, increasing transparency and enabling more robust end-user control mechanisms. Compliance reporting: Organisations would be required to comply with third-party external audits. While that audit would evaluate the platform’s systems and processes, compliance reporting may also include information on overall risk mitigation efforts. The challenging aspects of the DSA’s audit requirements To ensure compliance with the DSA’s provisions, digital service providers, predominantly VLOPs and VLOSEs, will be subject to independent audits. The audit must be conducted in accordance with the methodology and templates established in the delegated regulation, and the audit should review whether the VLOP or VLOSE: has a clear and transparent policy on how it addresses illegal content; has a system in place for detecting and removing illegal content and preventing the spread of disinformation; and provides users with adequate transparency about how their data is used. The audits will evaluate the platform’s efforts to deal with illegal content, the openness of content moderation procedures, adherence to DSA requirements, and the efficiency of user reporting mechanisms. The platform’s practices for data security and privacy will also be examined.  It will be challenging for online intermediaries to comply with some DSA requirements.  Accurate classification of digital services The DSA distinguishes between different types of digital services, such as intermediaries, hosting services and online platforms. Assigning the correct classification to a specific service can be complex, especially for hybrid platforms with multiple functionalities. Accurately defining the obligations and responsibilities associated with each classification requires careful analysis. Removing illegal content in a timely manner The DSA requires the removal of unlawful content in a timely manner after being made aware of its existence. Implementing effective content moderation mechanisms while respecting freedom of expression and avoiding over-removal or under-removal of content is a complex task. Developing sophisticated algorithms and human review processes to strike the right balance poses significant technical and operational challenges.  Further transparency about how content is moderated  The DSA requires more transparency about how online intermediaries moderate content. This includes providing information about the criteria used to moderate content, the processes used to make decisions and the appeals process available to users who flag moderation issues.  It can be difficult to require online intermediaries to disclose sensitive information about their internal operations. Additional steps to protect users’ privacy rights  The DSA requires additional steps to protect users’ privacy and enhance users’ rights. This includes transparency, user control over content and redress mechanisms.  These new provisions can be challenging to implement as they require online intermediaries to change their business practices significantly.  Implementing user-friendly interfaces and operative-complaint resolution mechanisms to ensure seamless user experiences can be technically complex and resource intensive. Compliance with new rules on targeted advertising  The DSA introduces new rules on targeted advertising. These rules prohibit online intermediaries from using sensitive personal data to target users with ads, and they require online intermediaries to give users more control over the ads they see.  Co-operation with authorities The DSA emphasises co-operation between platforms and regulatory authorities.  Ensuring information sharing, responding to legitimate requests and establishing effective communication channels with various national authorities across the EU pose many challenges. Maintaining confidentiality and data protection while complying with these requirements can be tricky. Interpretation of the DSA The interpretation of the DSA may evolve as it undergoes the legislative process. As such, there are themes associated with how one might expect an audit will be conducted: Transparency: The audits must be conducted transparently. Accountability: The audits are designed to ensure that VLOPs and VLOSEs are accountable for compliance with the DSA. Effectiveness: The audits must effectively identify and address any compliance gaps. Proportionality: The audits must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the VLOPS and VLOSEs. Flexibility: The delegated regulation allows auditors to adapt the audit methodology to the specific circumstances of the VLOP or the VLOSE. These are just some specific requirements that are tricky and complicated to implement. However, the DSA is essential to creating a safer and more accountable online environment. Best practice The table above displays exemplary and tactical actions that could be considered when enhancing users’ privacy rights and transparency about terms of service, consent, algorithms and advertising practices. In addition to these specific steps, companies should consider implementing several general best practices: A well-defined risk management framework: Establishing ongoing risk assessment activities will help companies identify and mitigate user risks. A culture of compliance: This will help ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the DSA requirements and committed to complying with them. A robust process for responding to incidents: This will help companies to respond quickly and effectively to any incidents that may arise. An oversight process for monitoring and reporting on compliance: This will help companies track their progress and identify areas where they may need to improve. A trustworthy online environment The DSA represents a significant step toward regulating online platforms and digital services within the EU. By introducing audit requirements, the DSA enhances transparency, accountability and user protection in the digital world. Independent audits will serve as a mechanism to ensure compliance with the DSA’s provisions, thereby fostering a safer, fairer and more trustworthy online environment. Mary Loughney is Director and Head of Technology Risk Consulting at Grant Thornton  Shane O’Neill is Partner and Head  of Technical Change, Financial Services Advisory at Grant Thornton  Filipa Sequeira is Senior Consultant of Financial Services Advisory at Grant Thornton

Maria McHugh shares how she set boundaries, shed the notion that she “can do it all”, and that achieving a successful career while prioritising family is possible with the right mindset and support Growing up, I had a keen interest in business and enterprise. Because of this, I completed a BSc in Finance at University College Cork, and, after considering career options, I felt that becoming a Chartered Accountant was the best fit for me and a good start to my business career.  This, however, wasn’t without its challenges. Coming back after a break Like many women, I had to make a decision about having children and consider how my career would be impacted.  Between 2014 and 2021, my husband and I had three children, and during that time, we decided that I would be a full-time stay-at-home mum because of a lack of childcare availability.  This unplanned, seven-year break in my career had a much bigger impact on me mentally than I ever would have thought. I felt that I had lost my professional self. I didn’t realise how important that identity was to me.  I watched as my peers’ careers progressed and felt left behind.  After seven years at home, I started to consider what returning to work would look like; frankly, it was terrifying.  I suffered from post-natal depression after my second baby, and it left me with low confidence and self-belief. Thankfully, earlier in my career, I met Karin Lanigan in Member Services at Chartered Accountants Ireland, and I always remembered her openness and honesty.  Personal priorities While I wanted my career back on track, it was also important that I continue to be available for my children. I lost my mum at 13 years old, so it has always been especially important to me to be at home for my children. I had to consider what type of professional role I wanted and how to balance my work and home life.  I felt passionate about helping start-ups, sole traders and being involved in local enterprises. Having completed the Chartered Accountants Ireland Diploma in Tax in 2018, opening my accountancy and tax practice seemed the best fit for me and the family.  I was excited by the prospect, but I was also incredibly overwhelmed, daunted, and the self-doubt and fear were crippling.  I had three small children, was moving from Dublin back to my native Dungarvan, and was now opening my own practice. It seemed insurmountable. Karin guided me in breaking the tasks into manageable steps and helped me see that this was achievable. Professional Standards and Practice Consulting were also very supportive, and I was delighted that so much support was offered by Chartered Accountants Ireland.  While on my journey back into the workplace, I was really heartened by all the supports that were available through the Institute, and I hope these only grow and extend to more women.  In some ways, I think women put themselves under too much pressure with the social narrative that “we can do it all”. I think we are our own worst critics, and we can each have an expectation for ourselves that we should be doing everything, and when we don’t, we think we are failing.   This perception is false and needs to change. It is OK to choose to stay at home with young children, and that  decision should not feel detrimental to our career or be something we need to explain or justify.  For me, it is all about balance, and this is personal to every family. We are all just doing our best to have a career in whatever way possible to suit our family life.  Setting boundaries Since I started my business, I have always had the mindset that I am going at my own pace.  The aim of having my own practice was that I could balance both my career and my family life but I recognised early on that working in my practice full time was just not going to work for my family. As a result, I learned how to say no. I created boundaries around my work schedule, especially during school holidays, and I don’t apologise  for it.  I sometimes think that women feel they need to be singularly career-orientated and driven to succeed to be taken seriously or that admitting the kids come first is a weakness. I don’t agree at all.  At the start of the summer, I announced on social media that I was taking a step back from work for the school summer holidays. The support from peers and clients was fantastic. People told me that my being upfront about the summer break was refreshing and inspired other parents to do the same.  It’s like anything – if you don’t see it being done, you don’t realise you can do it. This doesn’t mean that I am not career-driven or don’t have aspirations for my own business. But this is a marathon, not a sprint, and I will do it in my own time. Building your tribe Networking is vital to sole practitioners for promoting themselves and, more importantly, building solid support. When I started my practice, I had no colleagues to bounce ideas off or to ask questions. I feel strongly that this kind of support is important for my personal development, so I reached out to a fellow mum in practice from my PwC days and asked how she would feel about coming together to set up a small group.  We now have a core group of four accountants (also mums) in practice. We support each other, answer technical questions and get opinions on issues we come across. This group has been vital to growing my confidence and has shown me that there are others also dealing with the same problems. In my experience, the most important qualities for women in business are self-belief and self-confidence.  I am a great champion of women and our abilities but I have struggled with self-confidence in the last few years. When left unchecked, this self-doubt can be very limiting.  I would love to see the topic of low self-confidence as ways to manage it spoken about more. My self-confidence has grown over time, but it is something I work on and still struggle with to this day.  The more it is discussed, the more women will realise, like me, that they are not alone in this mental battle.  I am also very lucky to be a member of the 2023 Chamber of the Year, Dungarvan and West Waterford Chamber. Through this membership I have found another group of like-minded women on their own business journey. We support each other, attend events together and help each other when we can.  Finding your tribe in business is so important and having that sense of community and support from different groups has had a positive impact on my own business and personal development. Maria McHugh is Founder Owner of McHugh Accounting and Consultancy

Recent European heatwaves have highlighted the impact climate change has on society and the economy. Susan Rossney explores the challenges facing Irish businesses when taking steps to tackle the crisis Recent severe heatwaves in continental Europe have shown how the effects of global warming are coming ever closer to home. Forced migration, drought, forest fires and biodiversity loss are some of the many ways climate change will impact Irish society.  Its impact on the economy will be acute, affecting everything from the health and wellness of employees to the cost of raw materials, scarcity of resources and supply chain disruption.  Ireland and climate change Climate change poses risks to humans, nature and Ireland as a nation.  Ireland is legally bound to meet ambitious national and international climate targets. According to the Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC), an independent advisory body, Ireland will not meet the climate targets it has set for itself in the first and second carbon budget periods. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) provisional estimates on 2022 greenhouse gas emissions show that Ireland already used 47 percent of the carbon budget for 2021–2025 in the past two years.  An annual reduction of 12.4 percent is now required for each of the remaining years if Ireland is to stay within budget.  However, as emissions fell only 1.9 percent in 2022, this has been described as “extremely challenging” by the EPA.  It is clear that action is required across all sectors of the economy and society, including: Mitigation: reducing activity that causes climate change, like burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas); and Adaptation: making changes to deal with the effects of climate change, from operational changes to cope with rising summer temperatures or winter flooding to factoring in the risk of developing stranded assets and increased carbon tax liabilities. Ireland’s perception of climate change According to Climate Change in the Irish Mind, EPA research conducted in 2021, most Irish citizens share a desire for action on the climate crisis.  However, other EPA research has found that our emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) continue to rise.  Environmental Indicators Ireland 2022, published by the Central Statistics Office (CSO), shows that Ireland’s 2022 emissions were 11 percent higher than in 1990.  Enterprises contributed an estimated 12.7 percent to Ireland’s overall emissions in 2018, according to the Climate Action Plan 2023. Although this is less than the contributions of other sectors, there remains a need for Ireland’s enterprises to take action to reduce their emissions.  However, a 2022 national survey of 380 SMEs and larger enterprises across industry and service sectors by Microsoft and University College Cork found that Irish businesses are underprepared to make the necessary changes to transition to a net zero future. According to the study, 86 percent have no commitments or targets to decarbonise.  Barriers to action  In the face of evidence of climate change – and Ireland’s willingness to take action – what is preventing Irish businesses from responding to the crisis?  As an issue, climate change is complicated, abstract and overwhelming. Multiple interdependent factors cause it, and it is nearly impossible to avoid contributing to it in our daily lives. Buying products, driving a car or taking a flight for a foreign family holiday (full disclosure: I’m just back from one) all add to the overall problem. The solutions to the climate crisis are also interdependent and complicated. The positive changes we can make as individuals can feel insignificant, especially compared with large countries’ continued pollution.  The European Commission’s Annual Report on European SMEs 2021/22 – SMEs and environmental sustainability identified access to finance, limited expertise and skills, and regulatory and administrative barriers among the challenges facing SMEs in particular. Businesses that want to take climate action often have limited time, cash flow, resources and support (both financial and non-financial) to take action.  Knowledge is also a barrier. Many professionals qualified at a time when climate change was not identified as a business risk. They now find themselves having to skill up mid-career in an area that is famous for changing frequently.  Finally, many citizens and businesses are still struggling with crises related to COVID-19, inflationary pressure, supply chain disruption and high energy costs. Staying afloat is a crisis in itself.  Firms, particularly SMEs, focusing on the practicalities of running a business, paying staff and grappling with cash flow and costs are more likely to see climate action as the responsibility of governments or, at the very least, large corporations rather than them.  On top of that, climate discussions are often politicised. They are regularly reduced to a ‘them vs us’ polarised debate in mainstream media rather than discussing how everyone can work together to deliver solutions.  Threats and opportunities  For businesses, climate change presents both threats and opportunities.  Threats The threats have been categorised as physical risks (both ‘acute’ and ‘chronic’) and transitional risks.  Opportunities  Taking action on the climate crisis enables businesses to restore lost ecosystems, improve air quality, community health and well-being, and avail of the opportunity to make a lasting positive impact. There are additional advantages to consider: Reduced costs – the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) estimates that the average SME can save up to 30 percent on its energy bill by becoming more energy efficient (improved heating and lighting, lower maintenance of electric vehicles, efficient water and materials management and using recycled materials with a lower climate impact all contribute to lower costs);  Reduced reliance on exposure to fluctuating oil and gas prices from switching from fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) to renewable energy sources; Reduced exposure to carbon tax, which is increasing €7.50 per tonne to €100 per tonne in 2030; Access to grants, allowances and tax reliefs; Improved access to capital and finance from investors and lending looking to ‘green’ their portfolios; and A competitive edge in attracting talent, clients and customers. Steps to climate action Businesses looking to take action on the climate crisis can take several steps: Build your knowledge. There are many resources out there, several provided by the Government and Chartered Accountants Ireland. Begin measuring emissions with tools like the Government’s Climate Toolkit for Business.  Consider an internal energy audit to find ways of reducing your carbon footprint. SEAI maintains a list of registered energy auditors and offers SMEs a €2,000 voucher towards the audit cost. Consider setting up an internal environment and climate impact team to devise a decarbonisation plan.  See also the Sustainability Glossary in the Sustainability Centre of the Chartered Accountants Ireland website.  For more, see www.charteredaccountants.ie/sustainability-centre/sustainability-home Susan Rossney is Sustainability Officer at Chartered Accountants Ireland Reporting and climate change The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is an EU Directive requiring certain companies to disclose information on sustainability-related impacts. It proposes significant changes to how entities report on their business’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) impacts. These changes will affect many enterprises – directly and indirectly.  Businesses ‘in scope’ of the CSRD are required to consider their supply chain when reporting on sustainability matters. This will mean that companies not in scope that form part of a supply chain may be asked to provide climate-related information by companies in scope. Small companies should prepare for this and have a mechanism to measure and disclose their carbon emissions. For more on the CSRD, see the Chartered Accountants Ireland Technical Hub. Dee Moran is Professional Accountancy Lead at Chartered Accountants Ireland  

Michael Diviney and Níall Fitzgerald explore the ethical challenges arising from artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ‘narrow’ AI, and highlight the importance of ethics and professional competence in its deployment Earlier this year, artificial intelligence (AI) industry leaders, leading researchers and influencers signed a succinct statement and warning: “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” Was this a publicity stunt? Well, probably not, as the generative AI ChatGPT was already the fastest-adopted application in history.  Was this an over-the-top, alarmist statement by a group possibly trying to steal a march on self-regulation of a rapidly emerging technology and growing industry?  Again, this is unlikely if one considers the warnings of pioneer thinkers like Nick Bostrom, Max Tegmark, Stephen Hawking and Astronomer Royal Martin Rees. They concur that there is an existential threat to humankind if human-level or ‘general’ AI is developed and the ‘singularity’ is reached when AI surpasses human intelligence.  Autonomous weapons and targeting are a clear risk, but more broadly, unless we can ensure that the goals of a future superintelligence are aligned and remain aligned with our goals, we may be considered superfluous and dispensable by that superintelligence.  As well as the extinction threat, general AI presents other potential ethical challenges.  For example, if AI attains subjective consciousness and is capable of suffering, does it then acquire rights? Do we have the right to interfere with these, including the right to attempt to switch it off and end its digital life?  Will AI become a legal entity and have property rights? After all, much of our economy is owned by companies, another form of artificial ‘person’. Ethical challenges from ‘narrow’ AI Until general AI is here, however – and there is informed scepticism about its possibility – the AI tools currently in use are weak or ‘narrow’ AI. They are designed to perform a specific task or a group of related tasks and rely on algorithms to process data on which they have been trained.  Narrow AI presents various ethical challenges:  Unfairness arising from bias and opacity (e.g. AI used in the initial screening of job candidates include a gender bias based on historical data – in the past more men were hired); The right to privacy (AI trained with data without the consent of the data subjects); Threats to physical safety (e.g. self-driving vehicles); Intellectual property and moral rights, plagiarism and passing-off issues in the use of generative AI like ChatGPT and Bard; and Threats to human dignity from the hollowing out of work and loss of purpose. Regulation vs. ethics Such issues arising from the use of AI, particularly related to personal data, mean that regulation is inevitable.  We can see this, for example, with the EU’s landmark AI Act, due to apply by the end of 2025, which aims to regulate AI’s potential to cause harm and to hold companies accountable for how their systems are used. However, as Professor Pat Barker explained at a recent Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (CCAB) webinar, until such laws are in place, and in the absence of clear rules, ethics are required for deciding on the right way to use AI.  Even when the regulation is in place, there are likely to be cases and dilemmas that it has not anticipated or about which it is unclear. Legal compliance should not be assumed to have all the ethical issues covered, and as AI is evolving so quickly, new ethical issues and choices will inevitably emerge.  Ethics involves the application of a decision-making framework to a dilemma or choice about the right thing to do. While such a framework or philosophy can reflect one’s values, it must also be objective, considered, universalisable and not just based on an instinctual response or what may be expedient. Established ethics frameworks include: the consequentialist or utilitarian approach – in the case of AI, does it maximise benefits for the greatest number of people?; and the deontological approach, which is based on first principles, such as the inalienable rights of the individual (an underlying philosophy of the EU’s AI Act). (The Institute’s Ethics Quick Reference Guide, found on the charteredaccountants.ie website, outlines five steps to prepare for ethical dilemmas and decision-making.)  A practical approach While such philosophical approaches are effective for questions like “Should we do this?” and “Is it good for society”, as Reid Blackman argues in Harvard Business Review, businesses and professionals may need a more practical approach, asking: “Given that we are going to [use AI], how can we do it without making ourselves vulnerable to ethical risks?”  Clear protocols, policies, due diligence and an emphasis on ethical risk management and mitigation are required, for example responsible AI clauses in agreements with suppliers. In this respect, accountants have an arguably competitive advantage in being members of a profession; they can access and apply an existing ethical framework, which is evolving and adapting as the technology, its opportunities and challenges change.  The Code of Ethics The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) recently revised the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (Code) to reflect the impact of technology, including AI, on the profession. The Chartered Accountants Ireland Code of Ethics will ultimately reflect these revisions.  IESBA has identified the two types of AI likely to have the most impact on the ethical behaviour of accountants:  Assisted intelligence or robotic process automation (RPA) in which machines carry out tasks previously done by humans, who continue to make decisions; and  Augmented intelligence, which involves collaboration between human and machine in decision-making. The revisions also include guidance on how accountants might address the risks presented by AI to ethical behaviour and decision-making in performing their role and responsibilities.  Professional competence and due care The Code requires an accountant to ensure they have an appropriate level of understanding relevant to their role and responsibilities and the work they undertake. The revisions acknowledge that the accountant’s role is evolving and that many of the activities they undertake can be impacted by AI.  The degree of competency required in relation to AI will be commensurate with the extent of an accountant’s use of and/or reliance on it. While programming AI may be beyond the competency of many accountants, they have the skill set to:  identify and articulate the problem the AI is being used to solve;  understand the type, source and integrity of the data required; and assess the utility and reasonableness of the output.  This makes accountants well placed to advise on aspects of the use of AI. The Code provides some examples of risks and considerations to be managed by professional accountants using AI, including: The data available might not be sufficient for the effective use of the AI tool. The accountant needs to consider the appropriateness of the source data (e.g. relevance, completeness and integrity) and other inputs, such as the decisions and assumptions being used as inputs by the AI. This includes identifying any underlying bias so that it can be addressed in final decision-making. The AI might not be appropriate for the purpose for which the organisation intends to use it. Is it the right tool for the job and designed for that particular purpose? Are users of the AI tool authorised and trained in its correct use within the organisation’s control framework? (One chief technology officer has suggested not only considering the capabilities of the AI tool but also its limitations to be better aware of the risks of something going wrong or where its use may not be appropriate.) The accountant may not have the ability, or have access to an expert with that ability, to understand and explain the AI and its appropriate use.  If the AI has been appropriately tested and evaluated for the purpose intended. The controls relating to the source data and the AI’s design, implementation and use, including user access. So, how does the accountant apply their skills and expertise in this context?  It is expected that accountants will use many of the established skills for which the profession is known to assess the input and interpret the output of an AI tool, including interpersonal, communication and organisational skills, but also technical knowledge relevant to the activity they are performing, whether it is an accounting, tax, auditing, compliance, strategic or operational business decision that is being made.  Data and confidentiality According to the Code, when an accountant receives or acquires confidential information, their duty of confidentiality begins. AI requires data, usually lots of it, with which it is trained. It also requires decisions by individuals in relation to how the AI should work (programming), when it should be used, how its use should be controlled, etc.  The use of confidential information with AI presents several confidentiality challenges for accountants. The Code includes several considerations for accountants in this regard, including: Obtaining authorisation from the source (e.g. clients or customers) for the use of confidential information, whether anonymised or otherwise, for purposes other than those for which it was provided. This includes whether the information can be used for training AI tools.  Considering controls to safeguard confidentiality, including anonymising data, encryption and access controls, and security policies to protect against data leaks.  Ensuring controls are in place for the coding and updating of the AI used in the organisation. Outdated code, bugs and irregular updates to the software can pose a security risk. Reviewing the security certification of the AI tool and ensuring it is up to date can offer some comfort.  Many data breaches result from human error, e.g. inputting confidential information into an open-access web-based application is a confidentiality breach if that information is saved, stored and later used by that application. Staff need to be trained in the correct use and purpose of AI applications and the safeguarding of confidential information. Dealing with complexity The Code acknowledges that technology, including AI, can help manage complexity.  AI tools can be particularly useful for performing complex analysis or financial modelling to inform decision-making or alerting the accountant to any developments or changes that require a re-assessment of a situation. In doing so, vast amounts of data are collected and used by AI, and the ability to check and verify the integrity of the data introduces another level of complexity.  The Code makes frequent reference to “relevancy” in relation to the analysis of information, scenarios, variables, relationships, etc., and highlights the importance of ensuring that data is relevant to the problem or issue being addressed. IESBA was mindful, when revising the Code, that there are various conceivable ways AI tools can be designed and developed to use and interpret data.  For example, objectivity can be challenged when faced with the complexity of divergent views supported by data, making it difficult to come to a decision. AI can present additional complexity for accountants, but the considerations set out in the Code are useful reminders of the essential skills necessary to manage complexity. Changing how we work As well as its hugely beneficial applications in, for example, healthcare and science, AI is proving to be transformative as a source of business value.  With a range of significant new tools launched daily, from personal effectiveness to analysis and process optimisation, AI is changing how we work. These are powerful tools, but with power comes responsibility. For the professional accountant, certain skills will be brought to the fore, including adaptability, change and risk management, and leadership amidst rapidly evolving work practices and business models. Accountants are well placed to provide these skills and support the responsible and ethical use of AI.  Rather than fearing being replaced by AI, accountants can prepare to meet expectations to provide added value and be at the helm of using AI tools for finance, management, strategic decision-making and other opportunities. Michael Diviney is Executive Head of Thought Leadership at Chartered Accountants Ireland Níall Fitzgerald is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Imelda Hurley, CEO at Coillte, the semi-state forestry company, talks about her passion for sustainability and the importance of Ireland’s climate action and biodiversity agenda for the Irish economy and society  Imelda Hurley knew from an early age that she was destined for a career in business. Hurley tells Accountancy Ireland about her career path and how Coillte’s strategic vision will further support its contribution to Ireland’s climate targets, optimising the multiple benefits from forestry.  Tell us about yourself and the start of your career. I grew up on a family dairy farm just outside Clonakilty in West Cork. My first job was with Clonakilty Black Pudding, a little-known brand back then, but now a very successful and entrepreneurial operation. I completed a Business Studies degree at the University of Limerick. Following that I joined Arthur Andersen and became a Chartered Accountant. During that time, I had the opportunity to engage with multinationals and indigenous companies. That gave me a great lens into how organisations successfully operate, develop and implement strategy. How has your career evolved since you qualified as a Chartered Accountant? A: I always had an ambition to become a CFO and eventually a CEO. My career experience has been from farm to fork to forestry, working in the food, agribusiness and agriservices businesses across a variety of ownership structures.  During my role as CFO and Head of Corporate Sustainability at PCH International in China, I had the opportunity to learn more about sustainable product development and supply chain management.  That was over 10 years ago, when few organisations were talking about sustainability. I’m left reflecting on how times have changed over those 10 years and how there is an increased focus on sustainability today.  You were appointed as CEO of Coillte in November 2019. Tell us about your role and what attracted you to the position. I really enjoy the outdoors and nature. Coillte gave me a great opportunity to work in a business with a commercial focus, but also a business delivering social good. I joined Coillte in November 2019 and I spent much of the first two years navigating the pandemic. I wanted to ensure that Coillte emerged from the pandemic as a sustainable, viable and vibrant organisation. I am pleased to say that when we reported our 2021 results, we delivered record revenues, record profitability and a record dividend to the State.  Coillte manages 440,000 hectares of primarily forested land, circa seven percent of Ireland’s land, with about 6,000 individual properties. We have just over 800 employees and 1,200 contractors working across three divisions: Coillte Forest, Land Solutions and Medite Smartply.  Coillte is the nation’s largest forester and producer of certified wood, a natural, renewable and sustainable resource and the largest provider of outdoor recreation space in Ireland. It enables wind-energy on the estate, processes forestry by-products and undertakes nature rehabilitation projects of scale. When you were presented with your Businessperson of the Year Award in December, you were described as an “advocate for sustainable business practices and a leader in sustainability discussions”. Why is sustainability important to you? We are on a journey that requires us to leave the planet in a better place than we found it. There is a financial balance sheet but also an environmental and social balance sheet. Good business brings these together. From my perspective, I accepted the award on behalf of Team Coillte, all of whom work every day to balance and deliver the multiple benefits of forestry.  Tell us about the strategic vision you launched last year and Coillte’s plans for the next 12 months and beyond. In April 2022, we launched a new forest strategic vision focusing on four pillars – Forests for Climate, Wood, Nature and People. This vision sees us, as an example, enabling the creation of 100,000 hectares of new forests by 2050. Those forests will sink approximately 18 million tonnes of CO2.  We are also working on how we manage our existing forests to capture an additional 10 million tonnes of CO2 by 2050.  We have an ambition to redesign approximately 30,000 hectares of peatland forests through a programme of rewetting or rewilding for climate and ecological benefits and also aiming to enable the generation of one gigawatt of renewable wind energy by 2030.  From a people and recreational perspective, we are targeting to enable €100 million of investment to create world-class visitor destinations by 2030.  In July 2022, we launched Beyond The Trees, Avondale at Avondale Forest Park in County Wicklow and in June of this year, we opened the newly refurbished Avondale House, further adding to Avondale Forest Park experience, which has had over 300,000 visitors since June 2022. Our ongoing focus is to continue to ensure a strong, viable, vibrant Coillte that focuses on optimising our contribution to Ireland’s Climate Action plan, while continuing to deliver sustainably certified timber to support the decarbonisation of the built environment.  Our strategic vision also involves increasing from 20 percent of the estate being primarily managed for nature and biodiversity to 30 percent by 2025 and to 50 percent in the long-term. Another major focus for us is workforce capacity, planning for our organisation and the industry more broadly. We have 440,000 hectares under management and between now and 2050 the State has an ambition to increase forest cover from 11.6 percent to 18 percent. As such there will be a requirement to attract more people into our sector going forward. Are you glad you made the decision to qualify as a Chartered Accountant and what career advice would you offer your younger self? A: In the early years of my career, I looked up to others. Ultimately, I realised what was much more important was to follow my own path and enjoy the journey. You have to do what makes you happy and if you work hard and are determined, good things will come.  

Patrick McCarthy's failed Y-combinator interview changed his perspective on problem-solving. He highlights five common stressors experienced by ACAs and suggests developing skills to address them In 2019, I had a 10-minute interview that could have made me a millionaire.  Y-combinator is a business accelerator program in San Francisco famous for being early investors in Stripe, Airbnb and Dropbox. Of 15,000 applications, they interview 600, of which 50 percent will be chosen for investment. We made that 600.  I won’t drag you through the suspense. We didn’t get in. They hated our idea (to create a Netflix for Continuous Professional Development), but the explanation of why they hated it changed the way I have looked at problems and solutions forever. Performing under pressure… or not Fifteen seconds into the interview, we pitched our idea.  I don’t remember most of the next nine minutes specifically, but I do remember being really annoyed that they kept asking us the same question: “How would you create content that was broad enough for a mass audience but make it specific enough to solve the problems on an individual scale?”  We answered it. They asked it in a different way. We answered again. They asked in a different way. Continuous loop.  We had prepared over 50 questions, and they still hadn’t moved past this one. I felt the time passing. It was infuriating, and I wasn’t handling it well.  A chime went off; it was the timer to signal the 10 minutes were up. They said thanks, and the Zoom call ended.  It's not you (or me) Y-combinator communicates the process to you ahead of time. If you’re successful in the interview, someone will call you immediately. Otherwise, you receive an email with feedback.  We waited for the email. The feedback was painful and centred on the looping question. It felt like a personal rejection. But it wasn’t. And that’s the key takeaway from the whole debacle. So many people attribute blame to themselves when the blame can often be inherent in a situation.  Take our position into consideration. Y-combinator has invested in various companies trying to do what we were doing. They all failed based on the content creation for a mass audience not being specific enough on an individual basis. Millions of dollars had been wasted. The interview panel had invested in those ideas. That’s why they were interviewing us. The obsession with that question was to see if we had some sort of unique insight into how to solve it. Without an insight, we had no chance of succeeding.  It didn’t matter what we’d done or who we were. We weren’t special. We were just two more people with a common idea who had no insight on how it could grow apart from “we’ll figure it out”.  I’m not going to pretend I enjoyed the experience. I didn’t. But the lessons were invaluable.  Their rejection wasn’t personal. The problems we inherited weren’t personal either. They were situational. Anyone building a business in this space inherited the problems we did. Why that matters to you There are five problems almost all ACAs experience stress around. They’re inherent in qualifying as an ACA. You may not experience any of them ever, but you’d be unique if that was the case.  I hear these problems from hundreds of people every year through my lecturing. They’re always the same. Here they are in no particular order: Their manager: The feeling of support from your manager is  one of the cornerstones of enjoying and staying in your job. The minute you don’t feel supported, you’d have one foot out the door. Personal fulfilment: Some people want to find a large element of personal fulfilment and satisfaction in their work, and if that disappears, they often question their jobs. Professional development: In some positions, competition for promotions and leadership roles can be fierce, and this can create pressure and anxiety for individuals who are seeking to advance their careers. Social pressure: There is often societal pressure to 'succeed' and advance in one's career, and this can create additional stress and worry for people who feel that some jobs may be more prestigious than others. Work-life balance: The trade-off between working hours and salary is a constant battle for most people. Most of these problems have a large portion of generality followed by a flavour of individualism.  For example, you fight with your manager because you format documents differently from how they do. The generality of that problem is a relationship issue with your manager (everyone has them). The specific piece is it’s based on formatting (individual part).  It would make sense generally to develop skills to deal with these five problems instead of taking on each one personally. What (I think) I would do I have purposely kept this light because I refuse to give specific advice to a general audience (Y-combinator echoing in my mind). What I will do is outline exactly what I think I would do.  First, I would evaluate my own job based on how things are going.  Most people are quite happy in their roles. If you are one of the people who aren’t, take out a piece of paper and rate your issues on a scale of 1–10 with 1 meaning you don’t care about that problem much and 10 meaning that it matters a lot to you.  Now you have narrowed it down to what you care about.  Second, I would find someone a few years older than you to reach out to for advice. It may be an ACA or someone else you admire. I would ask them what they would do if they were experiencing one of your problems, or if have they any advice on how to manage the situation.  In every situation there is an element of responsibility that has to be taken on by you. However, if this isn’t the first or second time you’ve found yourself with this issue, you may need to look at your skillset in problem resolution.  Getting advice from an objective person can be invaluable in this context.  There are 30,000 qualified Chartered Accountants in Ireland. I have yet to meet one who wouldn’t spare 10 minutes to offer advice to someone asking in the right way. Navigating our growth Ultimately, my failed Y-combinator interview may not have made me a millionaire, but the lessons learned and the changed perspective on problems and solutions have proven invaluable. Rejections should not be taken personally but rather viewed as situational challenges to overcome, and by developing skills to address common stressors and seeking advice when needed, we can navigate these challenges and grow both personally and professionally. Patrick McCarthy is a Chartered Accountant and Founder of Performance Labs

You’ve finished up your exams and now have some time to relax. However, you want to make sure you don’t lose focus. Suvi Inkinen shares her tips on staying motivated while having a restful summer With the CAP1 and CAP2 exams completed for the summer, some students might feel a slump in their productivity or worry they will get out of their established study-work-life routine. Here are a few ways to stay active while getting a much-needed break. Upskilling The summer is the perfect time to upskill in ways that may be unrelated to work.  For most students, it is a slightly quieter period and thus is great for branching out into different work-related tools. For example, teaching yourself how to use various digital assets. This is a good way to keep the brain active during summer. Prioritise your health Students should learn to prioritise their health to maintain an excellent work-life balance.  Working or studying late some evenings is a must, but students should always ensure that they’re getting enough exercise and rest.  A simple way to ensure a good work-life balance is to take your lunch break and have it blocked off on your calendar every day. If I’m working from home, I love to head out on a walk during lunchtime.  Another fantastic way to ensure there is balance in your busy life as a Chartered Accountancy student is to get actively involved in related societies, such as CASSI (or regional societies for Dublin, Cork, Ulster, Galway, Mid-West, Midlands and Limerick) for students or Young Professionals (YPs) once you qualify.  CASSI & YPs provide academic content through webinars, CPD events, exam top-tips and career evenings throughout the year, along with social activities such as BBQs, quizzes, cruises and weekends away with fellow Chartered Accountants. Prep for the next term? I recommend taking a break from studying over the summer period and starting fresh once the term begins.  The Institute’s exams are much more challenging than any college exam (in my opinion), and your brain deserves a break before starting again in September.  I always find myself motivated to begin studying again after taking time off and relaxing. You’ll have plenty of time to study before the next set of exams! CASSI CASSI is there for students, and you can contact us through any of our socials, which include: Email Address: cassinetwork@gmail.com Instagram: @cai_student_society LinkedIn: Chartered Accountants Students Society Ireland Our CASSI Education Officer prepares an exam survey sent to students via the Institute’s student affairs team after each exam. I recommend that students complete this survey as the results are brought to the Institute for review when assessing the marking scheme. This contributes to how exams are run in the future, ensuring your needs are being met. Suvi Inkinen is a Risk Assurance Associate at PwC Ireland 

Sustainability is often seen as the domain of large corporates but SMEs have the collective potential to be more powerful players. Sheila Killian explains why Social and environmental sustainability is often seen as more relevant to big multinational companies (MNCs) than to SMEs, small-to medium enterprises employing no more than 250 people. MNCs are more likely to have a sustainability strategy, and resources for its implementation, monitoring, reporting and communication.  They are more likely to report externally, integrating their reporting across sustainability and financial activities, and to be scored by ESG rating agencies.  This does not mean that MNCs carry all the responsibility or should reap all the benefits, however.  SMEs are enormously impactful in aggregate and have a huge amount to gain by getting involved. So, why and how should they engage? The potential impact of SMEs on sustainability SMEs have a massive collective impact. In Ireland, they account for seven jobs in 10. While large companies are commonly exporters, SMEs tend to serve their local region.  In terms of where people live, work, shop and spend their leisure time, smaller enterprises dominate. This amplifies both their responsibility, and the opportunities open to them. Because SMEs are embedded in their communities, they often make a huge contribution socially without realising it. This may lie less in strategy than in values.  David O’Mahony of O’Mahony’s Booksellers Ltd, a long-established independent bookshop in the south-west, sums up the position: “It’s only when you really think about it and put all the things together that you realise that there’s a lot more going on … [in corporate responsibility and sustainability] … than we would have probably realised ourselves.”  O’Mahony’s enjoys high social capital locally, gained through understated good work for the community and environment, derived from values and a sense of neighbourliness rather than from formal reporting.  Why SMEs do not report Despite this implicit moral accountability, many SME owners do not think about reporting externally on their sustainability. This is often because they don’t see the value to be gained. Compared with MNCs, there is much less separation between ownership and management/control in SMEs.  Therefore, the need for both internal and external reporting is reduced because the main shareholders are already intimate with what is going on in the business, and employees are closer to the leadership.  Unless the business is considering raising external finance, there is little need to consider how potential investors might perceive it, and if there is a perception that customers are not interested in sustainability activities, these will not be reported.  It seems to come naturally to SMEs to be community-oriented, however, often because they are family-owned, and such behaviour reflects the origins and values of the family.  Such firms tend not to have formal, written codes of conduct, but instead propagate the personal values of their owners, who do not consider that a separate, published set of values and reporting on their social and environmental activities is necessary for business. Why SMEs should report One reason for SMEs to begin some form of sustainability reporting is so that they can compete with MNCs locally to attract and retain talented employees.  The labour market is tight, remote working has shifted the power balance, and younger generations are more focused on sustainability.  Increasingly, SMEs are framing their sustainability credentials more clearly, and connecting them with their employer brand so that they can attract the talent they need.  There is also a consumer angle. The challenge posed by behemoth online retailers to small, local bricks-and-mortar businesses is now well-rehearsed.  A small, independent business, like a bookshop, needs to clarify and articulate its values and personal touch as a competitive advantage.  This ‘personality’ needs to be communicated externally if it is to reach the right customers effectively. Sustainability reporting can convey a sense of what the company is all about, its values and purpose – its ‘soul’. A third reason, particularly applicable to SMEs operating in the business-to-business sphere, is that reporting on strong sustainability metrics confers an advantage in entering the supply chains of larger firms.  If, for instance, an MNC is moving towards zero-carbon, it is likely to require smaller companies in its supply chain to be also on that journey.  A fourth reason to report is the internal value to be gained from paying attention to sustainability. Measuring, reporting and constructing a narrative around social and environmental values will improve the culture of the business, and pave the way to greater innovation.  Hotel Doolin in County Clare is an example of a small business that tells its sustainability story effectively. It has shortened its supply chain by buying local produce.  The hotel harvests rainwater, it has eliminated single-use plastics, and uses environmentally low-impact energy and heating. It became Ireland’s first carbon-neutral hotel in 2019, under the Green Hospitality Programme, ahead of many larger competitors.  The business also promotes social sustainability, employing refugees, supporting local community groups and actively seeks to be a good employer. This has enhanced its reputation not only locally but nationwide.  Partnering with not-for-profits Smaller companies that are ambitious in terms of sustainability targets will inevitably want to achieve things that are beyond their capacity.  If, for example, a business decides to work on the water quality in the area in which it operates, it may lack in-house expertise, jeopardising its credibility with the local community. One solution may be a partnership with a not-for-profit organisation (NFP). NFPs often have the expertise to tackle social and environmental issues but lack the resources, whereas companies may have resources (money) but lack the knowledge. A partnership can achieve sustainability goals if the match is right.  The NFP needs to be operating in the area in which the company wants to make progress, and the company needs to align with the NFP’s approach to society and the environment.  Mutual respect and consultation are key. At worst, a partnership can be seen as a ‘fig leaf’ for the SME and can undermine the legitimacy of the NFP. At best, it can be truly impactful for all involved. SMEs’ supply chain responsibilities  MNCs are famously held responsible for the working conditions in which their goods are produced by companies in their supply chains. Scandals, including the sweatshop labour exposed in the 1990s to the Rana Plaza garment factory collapse in Bangladesh in 2013, have forced companies such as Nike, Gap and Nestlé to change their practices.  Bad practices persist today, however, even where goods are produced close to home. In 2020, for example, it was revealed that online vendor BooHoo was selling clothes made in extremely poor working conditions in Leicester in the UK.  For a small, independent retailer, this means that, unless it takes steps to assure itself of the origin of the goods it sells, the risk remains that all or some element/s of those goods may have been produced in sweatshop conditions.  Smaller firms may lack resources to monitor conditions in their suppliers’ factories. Nor are they likely to have the requisite buying power to impose a code of conduct on their suppliers. So, what can they do about the conditions under which the goods they sell are produced? The International Labour Organization has clarified that a firm has responsibility as far up the supply chain as it has ‘reasonable influence’.  Large firms can leverage direct buying power to positively impact supplier. Starbucks works with its coffee producers to bring them up to higher social and environmental sustainability standards, for example.  A small trader is, however, limited to choosing suppliers wisely, and using their influence when feasible, perhaps working with other firms in the sector. The key differences between the supply chain responsibility of MNCs and SMEs, then, relate to power and influence. This principle also applies to other areas of sustainability. More power means more responsibility and the potential to make a positive impact.  SMEs need to address all the key issues of fair pricing, employee welfare, human rights and environmental impact within their own operations and – as far as possible – outside of them, bearing in mind their levels of resources and power.  The key questions here are: “Are we doing all we reasonably can to achieve sustainable practice?” and “Are we seeking to improve?”  Sometimes, acting in concert with other SMEs, can achieve more. The outcome may not be perfection, but honest efforts in the right direction will carry collective weight.  Sustainability and the SME advantage While corporate sustainability is often seen as the domain of MNCs, SMEs – because of their numbers and connection with, and impact on, society – are potentially more important players.  Many SMEs do not report their sustainability policies for several reasons, including informality, time and resource pressures, unfamiliarity with reporting standards and frameworks, or because a strong internal locus of value and ethical behaviour is already vested in their owners and leaders.  However, SMEs generally have high levels of engagement with their local communities and implement sustainability on an intuitive basis, drawing on leaders’ personal values. Reporting these efforts can bring significant advantages externally and internally.  Despite a lack of resources relative to larger companies, the key to building sustainable value for SMEs lies in making the best choices that are within their power at a given time. Sheila Killian is Associate Professor at Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, and author of Doing Good Business: How to Build Sustainable Value

With the Central Bank of Ireland’s consultation on the Individual Accountability Framework drawing to a close later this month, Níall Fitzgerald reviews the scope and effectiveness of similar regimes already in place in other parts of the world Following the 2008 financial crisis, global governance and regulatory reforms in the financial services sector have had a significant impact on how financial institutions, such as banks, insurance companies and investment firms, are run.  The EU has been at the forefront of regulatory change in financial services in Ireland since the creation of the Banking Union, which includes the European Supervisory Mechanism, and significant regulatory developments from rule-setters such as the European Banking Authority.  The Central Bank of Ireland has also put in place governance requirements for all financial institutions and implemented fitness and probity standards. These have included regulations requiring minimum competencies for individuals working in certain roles and, in some cases, regulatory pre-approval before individuals can be appointed to certain management positions, such as – to name just a few – board director, head of compliance, head of internal audit and chief risk officer. The proposed Central Bank of Ireland Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) is an extension of the current suite of regulations and efforts to address cultural failings and ensure better governance, performance and accountability among financial services firms.  The IAF is not the first of its kind, however, and while it has some unique features, it also shares similarities with regimes of this nature operating in other parts of the world.  UK: Senior Managers and Certification Regime The UK introduced the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) in 2016. Following a three-phase roll-out over three years, the SM&CR now applies to banks, insurance companies and a large portion of the remaining regulated financial services firms in the UK. This regime introduced: Prescribed responsibilities for certain roles; Requirements for firms to follow when allocating those roles to individuals, including: applying a certification process (up to obtaining pre-approval from the Regulator for an appointment to a role); and  the introduction of individual conduct rules. Hong Kong: Manager-in-Charge Regime In Hong Kong, The Securities and Futures Commission introduced the Manager-in-Charge (MIC) Regime for licensed corporations in 2017.  The regime did not bring in any new sanctions and was implemented by way of circular, rather than legislation, but it provided the regulator with additional powers of enforcement and the ability to hold individuals to account. A key objective of the MIC regime is to enable Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission to assess culture within the licensed organisation.  The regulator attributes non-compliance with elements of the regime – e.g. failure to assess whether individuals have discharged their responsibilities appropriately, as evidence of cultural failings. Australia: Banking Executive Accountability Regime  Australia’s Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) came into effect in 2018, applying to the directors of, and the most senior and influential executives within, banks and authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs). The regime introduced prescribed responsibilities for certain roles, an accountability framework, and a list of accountability obligations, which look a lot like conduct rules.  The regime also introduced a requirement for relevant firms to defer a portion of the variable remuneration of any person found to be non-compliant with the regime until an investigation concludes, whether or not any or all of the remuneration is subject to clawback.  Singapore: Individual Accountability and Conduct Guidelines  The Individual Accountability and Conduct (IAC) Guidelines were introduced in Singapore in 2021. Like the MIC regime in Hong Kong, Singapore’s IAC Guidelines are not supported by underlying legislation and are described as “best practice standards”.  The level of adherence to IAC Guidelines among the financial institutions will impact the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s overall risk assessment of the relevant organisation or individual.  These guidelines focus on embedding a strong culture of responsibility and ethical behaviour by ensuring individual accountability and a supportive governance framework within regulated organisations.  Prevention is better than cure While there are similarities between the accountability regimes outlined above, none is the same.  The instances of enforcement action taken under these regimes are very low and, if prevention is better than cure, this may be a good measure of success.  Just one enforcement action was taken against an individual for non-compliance during the first four years of the UK’s SM&CR, for example. Following a review of Australia’s Banking Executive Accountability Regime, and amid public criticism citing the lack of enforcement action, the Australian government is currently proposing the wider reaching Financial Accountability Regime (FAR).  The FAR contains additional requirements and extends the regime beyond banks to other financial service providers regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.  Elsewhere, the United Arab Emirates does not have a specific accountability regime. However, its laws and regulations, which pre-date 2016, give financial services regulators enforcement powers to hold individuals to account and apply sanctions.  Looking at just one member of the United Arab Emirates, Dubai, the Dubai Financial Services Authority has taken enforcement action against 32 individuals since 2016. The majority of these cases have related to individuals providing investment services.  Perhaps it is still too early to reliably judge the effectiveness of these various models of individual accountability regimes.  Sometimes, there is a benefit in not being first past the post in introducing a regime of this nature and being able to stand back and learn from global experiences.  With our Individual Accountability Framework, Ireland is building on a solid foundation of banking regulations and governance requirements. The IAF is only one of many regulatory changes impacting financial services providers. Other requirements on the way include the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and the inevitable evolution of governance codes, and other regulations, addressing sustainability and other emerging risks.  World-class standards are laudable, but their true outcome is only evident when we have a high level of public trust and a financial services sector that is efficient and competitive, driving a better future for society and a prosperous economy. Níall Fitzgerald, FCA, is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland Impact of individual accountability on organisational culture Chartered Accountants Ireland welcomes the timely publication by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) of the Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) draft regulations and guidance, and the certainty of action required for Irish financial services firms, writes Níall Fitzgerald.  The framework contains measures, including conduct standards and prescribed responsibilities, designed to enhance customer-focused cultures and embed responsibility and ethical behaviour across financial services in Ireland.  While it promotes the necessity for cultural change, the CBI agrees that more is required to achieve this. Insights from the introduction of similar measures in other jurisdictions show that an individual accountability regime better impacts on organisational culture when supported by: Promoting individual accountability but emphasising collective decision-making Being accountable as individuals for actions and behaviour is not new. Professionals are accountable to codes of ethics. There are also many laws and regulations that hold individuals accountable for their roles in an organisation, such as fiduciary duties of directors. However, many organisations thrive on collaboration, teamwork and diversity, which improve collective decision-making. Individual accountability is not designed to override this, and emphasising other positive behaviours, such as these, supports the objectives of the IAF. Promoting a ‘just culture’ and avoiding a ‘blame culture’ A blame culture focuses on identifying culprit/s, penalising them, and moving forward on the assumption that the same issue/s won’t happen again, because an example has been set.  A just culture acknowledges that mistakes and underperformance can occur, but that both are better addressed by reflecting on what went wrong and focusing on what can be learned to improve future outcomes.  Individual accountability exists in both scenarios, but the latter will have a more positive impact amongst the workforce, helping to achieve the objectives of the IAF. Promoting trust and integrity Certain informal reactions to a regime such as the Individual Accountability Framework can undermine its objectives. In some jurisdictions individuals with prescribed responsibilities prepare personal compliance files, for example, privately maintained outside of the firm’s documentation system.  A ‘cover your actions’ (CYA) approach has developed in these jurisdictions, whereby there is a tendency to give advice formally (e.g. in writing), which would differ if given informally (e.g. verbally).  Notwithstanding the risk of breaching privacy and confidentiality rules, these informal practices are indicative of low levels of trust and integrity within a firm.  Embedding a culture of psychological safety can deter this risk and foster greater trust within the organisation.

As this year’s annual LGBTQ+ celebration begins, we talk to six BALANCE members about their experiences in life and work As Pride celebrations kick off all over the world this month, six members of BALANCE, the Institute’s LGBTQ+ Allies network group, tell us about their experiences and what employers can do to support true equality.  Eimer Proctor Senior Manager When I first came out, Pride felt like a celebration and a safe space to be myself. Over the years, I’ve come to appreciate that this is not always possible, but I respect the path that has been forged by others to get us where we are today. During Pride 2023, I will remember those who lost their lives and stand in solidarity with my LGBTQ+ community around the world who still face persecution and continue to fight for their right to be who they are. It’s eight years since Ireland achieved marriage equality, and yet it was only in January 2020 that the law in Northern Ireland finally caught up. Given our current political situation in Northern Ireland, it’s unlikely that we will see any further advancements in LGBTQ+ rights and equality in the near future.  I find this very concerning given the rise in hate crimes, conversion therapy and anti-trans rhetoric in the media. It is up to everyone to help end discrimination for the LGBTQ+ community and promote equality.  There has been some great progress in recent years concerning diversity and inclusion in the workplace, but there is still work to be done to protect LGBTQ+ employees and at the heart of this is education.  Employers can introduce diversity and inclusion policies and practices, for example appoint diversity champions and work with employees to help them understand the appropriate language they should use in the workspace. Liaising with employees in the LGBTQ+ community and their allies is vital to understanding the obstacles the members of this community face every day. This, in turn, facilitates a greater understanding of how and why diversity and inclusion policies can directly impact business.  Those employees will, in time, become more comfortable to be themselves within their workplace, as they navigate the corporate world with the full support of their employer. Having these policies in place will also help to attract talented candidates, who will be carefully considering organisations with a strong commitment to diversity and inclusion.  Conor Hudson Finance Director It’s a general perception that Pride means ‘celebration’ and ‘party’. And, yes, this is a part of Pride – a platform to be yourself and express yourself, but still people are also joining Pride to ‘protest’ and it is important to remember that Pride started as a protest. Equality for LGBTQ+ colleagues in the workplace isn’t about sticking up a rainbow flag at the start of June.  Last year, in my organisation, a colleague and I launched an LGBTQ+ Employee Resource Group (ERG) with the intention of discussing Pride. While the initial reaction was positive, one response we received was, “We support LGBTQ+ rights; why do we still need to talk about Pride?” This remark justified why we needed an ERG – to increase visibility and offer a safe space to LGBTQ+ colleagues and colleagues with LGBTQ+ family. It is important for employees to feel part of an open and inclusive workplace from day one and allyship helps support this.  One of the actions we have taken to demonstrate visible allyship is to create MS Teams backgrounds and badges to highlight that this person identifies as an ally. We have found these a useful tool during recruitment and first introductions.  Allyship and open workplaces not only positively impact LGBTQ+ colleagues but can also support colleagues with LGBTQ+ friends and family.  Creating safe spaces for allies is equally important. They can’t be expected to know all the answers and they should be able to ask genuine questions without being judged. This culture not only creates open environments for LGBTQ+ colleagues, but also for other intersectional aspects of diversity. Hugo Slevin Head of Function Pride is a great day for us as an LGBTQ+ community, along with our allies, to come together and show unity, and strengthen through open visibility. It is always around this time of year that we start hearing the same question, “Why do we still have Pride?”, but I think it remains such an important day as shown by events over the past 12 months. First, we continue to witness attacks against our community members in ever-increasing numbers. Attacks across Europe are currently at a 10-year high and recent media coverage in Ireland has again brought this sharply into focus.  As a community, we should be able to feel safe in expressing and being who we are. Pride is very much our time to come together and have a platform to vocalise and display these concerns. We have also witnessed attempts to control the narrative on gay rights across the globe. Of significant concern has been what appears to be a regressing of rights in parts of the US, where this downward trend seems set to continue.  Even in Ireland, we have seen attacks on libraries and the cancelling of drag events in the last 12 months. Pride is the time of year during which our voices can be heard, and we stand against deliberate attempts to silence our community. Finally, Pride is fun! The streets of Dublin come alive – there is a real sense of occasion and happiness in the air. We get to walk the streets, dance and celebrate with our family, friends and co-workers. Jonathan Totterdell Major Programmes, Financial Services Pride in 2023 means a day of visibility and courage for both the progress we have made and the long path ahead for LGBTQ+ people around the world.  Recent events such as anti-LGBTQ+ Bills being passed in Florida and – closer to home, the rise of the far right and their anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric – remind us that progress can be rolled back quickly, and it is imperative that those who live in relative safety can make some noise for those who can’t, without fear of repercussions. Over the past decade, I think we have seen some huge successes with gay marriage, a more open culture and a focus by corporates among Ireland to bring diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) to the C-suite. The financial services sector has been making really impressive strides. While there is a business case for DE&I, and many studies have shown that it leads to improved return on investment, I would like to see corporates in Ireland mature on this front, continue to grow their social consciousness, and see DE&I as a positive without the need to prove its financial return. Employers are expected to be ‘all in’ on DE&I in 2023, having the uncomfortable conversations that sometimes come with this topic, appointing champions and including DE&I as part of their leadership ethos. Inclusion is key on the DE&I agenda. You can have a diverse workforce, but without active inclusion, you will be missing a vital ingredient.  One thing I practice is to try to make sure everyone gets a chance to speak up at meetings and contribute ideas and viewpoints to decision-making. When people feel comfortable, they will be able to communicate their ideas more effectively.  Padraig Kilkenny Finance Manager For me, Pride is first and foremost a celebration. It is also an opportunity to reflect on the struggles for equality, not only in our own country, but for LGBTQ+ people across the world.  There is no doubt that Ireland has made considerable progress in terms of LGBTQ+ rights and fostering greater equality in recent years. Landmark victories such as the 2015 Marriage Equality Referendum and gender recognition legislation have increased visibility and acceptance across Irish society.  The Ireland of today reflects a society that embraces diversity and supports LGBTQ+ rights. This has never been more evident than at Chartered Accountants Ireland with initiatives such as the BALANCE network and, more generally, with its support for diversity and inclusivity initiatives. Personally, I am fortunate that I have never felt discriminated against in the workplace, but this is not to say that discrimination does not exist. What I have found helpful in my career is having LGBTQ+ representation at senior levels of the organisation and feeling that I have support from my colleagues and leadership.  I think this support can come in many forms from the highest levels where diversity and inclusion form part of the organisation’s strategy, values and by extension its culture, to more practical efforts, such as establishing and enforcing inclusive policies that protect LGBTQ+ employees from discrimination in areas like recruitment, promotion and benefits. Effective allyship is more than just having policies and strategies in place. It is about supporting and advocating for the rights, well-being and inclusion of LGBTQ+ employees.  Everyone should understand and challenge their own biases through education and listen to LGBTQ+ colleagues, valuing their experiences, and amplifying their voices and perspectives in discussions and decision-making processes.  Pride is a great marker in the calendar for employers to stop and reflect where they are on this journey to foster and support real equality across the board. Áine Crotty Audit and Outsourcing Manager As a leader of a team in my workplace, I believe in the power of people and the true potential that is inside each and every one of my colleagues regardless of their gender, age, sexual orientation, etc.  Therefore, being an ally to my LGBTQ+ colleagues is important to me because it supports them in reaching their full potential.  Non-LGBTQ+ professionals need to be aware of their actions and any potential bias they might have – without the awareness, there cannot be any action or change.  I would recommend attending events such as those organised by BALANCE so you can become aware of the issues your LGBTQ+ colleagues are facing.  There are also some fantastic resources and training out there about unconscious bias that will enable you to change the language you use or how you perceive and treat your colleagues.  After awareness comes accountability. As a non-LGBTQ+ professional, hold yourself accountable to making your work environment a more inclusive place for your colleagues. Make a commitment to yourself and others to change how you act with your LGBTQ+ colleagues for the better. Become an ally and be open and proud of that fact. Letting your colleagues know that you are an ally, and that you fully support them, can make them feel more comfortable in the workplace and allow them to speak more freely about any issues or discrimination they might be facing. It is widely known and accepted that culture comes from the tone at the top. Leaders, whether it be partners or senior executive management team members, need to bring DE&I to the forefront of their agenda. They need to live and breathe what they believe in and what they are trying to achieve for their employees. They need to lead by example and visibly demonstrate their belief in equality for all.

Ann-Marie Costello became the first female partner on the Corporate Finance Team at Grant Thornton earlier this year. Her advice to other women? Back yourself and take opportunities I grew up in a family of medical professionals, so accountancy was not necessarily the expected path. I actually changed from veterinary to commerce and German the day before the CAO application process closed, so my career could have been very different.   Opting to do a degree in commerce and German gave me time to decide what I wanted to pursue as a career. I found I really enjoyed the economics and accountancy modules, so it felt like a natural progression to go on to do the Master of Accounting at UCD Smurfit School before taking up a training contract with KPMG Corporate Recovery.  At the time, the accountancy ‘milk round’ was more geared towards traditional audit and tax routes, so joining an advisory team was the path less taken, but I really wanted the commercial experience that came with it.  Hitting the ground running Having a solid background in accountancy meant I could hit the ground running in Corporate Recovery and I had great training working on trading insolvencies. After qualifying and becoming a manager with KPMG, I left Ireland for a year of ‘anti-reality’, travelling the world.  When I returned, I met with Grant Thornton’s Debt Restructuring Team, who were pivoting away from insolvency. I liked the team and the idea of working to bring businesses back onto a stable footing.  After a few years, I transitioned to Corporate Finance and I made Partner in January of this year, becoming the first female partner in the department.  These days, my work is focused on helping shareholders to position themselves for the sale of a business and to maximise value. Most of my work has an M&A or due diligence focus.  So, in my career so far, I have been able to work with businesses across the entire economic cycle. Fall-off in female talent It just so happens that the areas in which I have worked have been particularly male-dominated, especially at senior levels.  My intake and training contract had a healthy mix of female versus male trainees but, from the manager level onwards, I saw a fall-off in female talent.  The reasons for the fall-off vary, ranging from the lack of a clear path for career progression, lack of support or mentorship, and movement from practice to industry, to work-life balance considerations and family commitments.  The diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) agenda was not well-developed when I was training, and as that has begun to change in more recent years, I think that it has brought some significant benefits. I do believe we have seen a move towards greater equity at senior levels – although the pace of change is slower than we may like, I think we’re getting there. We do need more balanced representation to attract younger generations – the ‘if you can’t see it, you can’t be it’ adage.  Greater supports are needed in the form of allyship and mentorship, as well as ensuring the wider conditions to support talent retention are met – these include issues such as childcare, paternity leave (both availability and take up) and flexible working.  There are wider societal shifts that need to become the norm to level the playing field further. Gender pay gap reporting Gender pay gap reporting has been a welcome development in terms of driving good behaviours within business and providing employees with greater transparency.  However, nothing can substitute the conversations on the ground that can provide you with clarity as to where you stand.  Conversations regarding remuneration, promotion and performance are often uncomfortable, so we sometimes tend to avoid broaching these subjects.  Time and time again, recruiters and HR teams tell me that, as women, we often undersell ourselves and have lower expectations for remuneration. We need to value our contributions more.  Do your research, back yourself and don’t be afraid to step out of your comfort zone to take on opportunities as they present themselves. Learning the skills for success At some point in your career, you will need to do more than just to be ‘good at the job’. At that stage, developing your career becomes about your network, your profile and your leadership. It is important to learn to have confidence in yourself and to value your input. This often comes with surrounding yourself with the right people, so don’t be afraid to talk – to your peers, your friends and your network. You will only ever regret the things you didn’t do, or say, so speak up and say ‘yes’ to opportunities for development. In my own experience, navigating career development and parenthood is not without its challenges. You need all the support you can get and to always try to look after yourself.  We just had our second baby towards the end of last year, a year during which I was also going through the partnership process, as well as taking on the role of Chairperson of Chartered Accountants Ireland Leinster Society.  I took on a lot, but there were several opportunities that presented themselves around the same time and, weighing it all up, I chose to go for them. I am lucky in that I have huge support from my family and, in particular, my husband, who had to pick up some of the slack. The role of mentoring and networking I sincerely believe that mentoring and sponsorship are key to development, and I’m glad to see so many businesses providing necessary resources and supports in these areas.  It’s important to have someone who can mentor you – someone who will tell it how it is, act as your sounding board and provide constructive criticism.  It is equally important to have a sponsor within your organisation – someone who will support you and guide you in your career development. I would encourage these relationships to be with both male and female mentors and sponsors.  It can often be helpful to have a mentor outside of your work environment to speak to about your work and personal development. Chartered Accountants Ireland provides a mentorship programme for members, which is a helpful resource. Networking can seem like a daunting task, particularly with the reopening of society post-pandemic. However, it really is never as bad as it seems.   The network of people Chartered Accountants will have from their time at university and training will be huge, and the Irish accountancy profession is particularly well-connected at home and abroad.  Try to keep this network active. You never know when you might be able to help someone, or when they might be able to help you.

As the new President of Chartered Accountants Ireland, Sinead Donovan is intent on showcasing a vibrant profession to ‘Next Gen’ members As she prepares for the year ahead as President of Chartered Accountants Ireland, Sinead Donovan’s key objective will be positioning the profession to attract the next generation. Her appointment to the role at the Institute’s AGM on Friday, 19 May, was a source of deep and genuine pride for Donovan, whose late father Cecil Donovan took on the same role in 1986. “It means a huge amount to me personally because of my father’s legacy and, professionally, I see it as the pinnacle of my career so far,” says Donovan.  “I’ve wanted to get here for a long time, because it matters enormously to me to be able to emulate my father, whom I admired so much, and to represent the profession I love.”  In the year ahead, Donovan says she will give “every possible effort” to representing all members of Chartered Accountants Ireland on the island of Ireland and overseas.  “The way I look at it, this role is about passing on the baton for the benefit of our members and the wider profession now and into the future,” she says. “My father passed the baton to me and being a Chartered Accountant has always felt to me like being part of a family that is unique in how we support each other. “So, my job is to pass the baton to the next generation – to show them what this profession is really about, and all that it can offer – and bring them into the family of accountants in which I have been able to build a fulfilling career that I love.” Donovan’s career has brought her to the pinnacle of the profession, as Chair of Grant Thornton Ireland and a Partner in the firm’s Financial Accounting and Advisory Services practice. “There has been a lot of variety in my career and a lot of opportunity. I have built some amazing relationships and worked in environments that are just really people-focused. “So, I want to get away from this idea of the ‘grey-suited accountant’ who works only with numbers. That is just not what a career as a Chartered Accountant is about.” Despite this, the perception of the profession among the Gen Z cohort (born between the mid-90s and early 2000s) now entering the workforce is not as positive as Donovan would like it to be. Gen Z research findings Recent Gen Z research carried out by Chartered Accountant Ireland, under the auspices of Chartered Accountants Worldwide, revealed a troubling ‘perception gap’ between respondents who had no experience of chartered accountancy and those who had commenced their training.  The study aimed to find out how the ACA qualification is perceived by Gen Z respondents in Ireland and worldwide. The Gen Z respondents in Ireland with no experience of chartered accountancy reported viewing the profession as challenging (56%), numbers-based (34%) and boring (19%).  They were considerably less likely than the global average to view the profession as purpose-led (2%), creative (0%), or exciting (4%).  Encouragingly, however, the Irish respondents who had begun their training were far more likely to view it as varied (up from 8% to 25%) and purpose-led. The respondents in this cohort describing it as boring halved.    “It’s clear that, once students commence their training, they get a much better sense of what the qualification is about, but for those who haven’t made the decision yet, the perception gap is pretty stark,” Donovan says.   “Irish students recorded a significant difference in perception, which shows us there is work to do. Engaging the next generation of accountants and the next generation of leaders will be front of mind for the Institute this year.” There are more routes into the profession today than ever before, but as Donovan sees it, more must be done to promote the qualification to the next generation, including changing the established and accepted ways of doing things.  “If the next generation does not buy into what we do and see itself in our profession, it will be because we are not adequately selling it to them, whether at school or third level, or in the early stages of their professional training,” she says.  “I want to ensure that students understand what ACA is and what the benefits of entering the profession are. Gone are the days of calculators and ledgers. Our focus now is on technology, data analytics, leadership skills and global developments.  “Being an Irish Chartered Accountant is respected around the globe and the qualification enables truly global travel and ability to do business. Our profession is in the middle of a recruitment and retention challenge and if we don’t step up to harness this talent pool, we are missing out.” Next Gen values and skill sets  There has been a lot of attention in public discourse about the need to ‘step up’ post-pandemic and help students and new recruits adapt to the working environment, Donovan says.  “There is also a need for us to re-examine that status quo and use this opportunity to ensure the environment is one that works for the next generation of the profession. Those at the start of their careers are seeking a greater degree of flexibility and better work-life balance and genuine diversity, equity and inclusion at work. “This idea of the ‘grey-suited accountant’ is just not it anymore. What I see in our younger members is a very vibrant cohort who will be leading business decisions into the future,” Donovan says. “They value sustainability and Chartered Accountants have an enormous role to play here in every sense – not just in terms of reporting and assurance, but also in shaping sustainability policy within companies and in advising organisations on sustainability best-practice.” Technology will also continue to play an ever-greater role in the work of the Chartered Accountant of the future, Donovan says. “Our Next Gen members will have to be at the forefront of information technology and data analytics, and in understanding the impact Artificial Intelligence is bringing to the world,” she says. “So, we need to make sure their education in these technologies is deep and comprehensive so that they are fully equipped with the skills they need to thrive in a rapidly changing world.” Next Gen education  For Donovan, education is also critically important to ensuring that the profession is “represented credibly” to the Next Gen members of Chartered Accountants Ireland.  “We’ve got to engage them in interesting methods of learning, syllabus content and topics that are actually relevant to the work of the Chartered Accountant from second level right through to third level, in their training and exam experience with the Institute and right through their career from there,” she says.  “In terms of secondary-level education, Pat O’Neill, our outgoing President, has done amazing work over the past year in raising awareness of how outdated the current Leaving Cert accounting syllabus is.  “The Institute has had a number of meetings with the Department of Education and Minister Norma Foley on this issue and Pat will now continue in the year ahead to progress to the next phase of this effort, which will be about driving action in updating the syllabus sooner rather than later.” As it stands, Chartered Accountants Ireland is already leading the way in helping secondary school pupils around the country understand what a career in accountancy is really about. In early 2020, the Institute launched Boot Camp, an online programme designed to help Transition Year and Senior Cycle students improve their accounting and business skills. The Boot Camp Challenge presents participants with a realistic scenario of a business in trouble, whose management must make important decisions about its future. Students review the relevant financial information, consider the wider circumstances, and suggest a possible course of action.  The programme has over 5,000 users active in all 26 counties in the Republic of Ireland “I’ve done the Boot Camp challenge myself, it’s brilliant. It teaches pupils about business, about how accountants are engaged in really critical business decisions, and the impact these decisions can have,” says Donovan. “Most importantly, I think it shows them that accountancy is not all about maths and numbers and breaks that perception that, unless you’re really good at maths, a career in accountancy isn’t for you, because that’s not the case at all.” Project Athena roadmap Innovation is already leading the educational agenda within Chartered Accountants Ireland, which completed Project Athena in 2022. Undertaken with funding from the Chartered Accountants Education Trust, the extensive research project included close to 100 interviews with senior members, academics and regulators in Ireland and overseas.  The findings were academically validated by Trinity College’s Learnovate Centre and will now drive the Institute’s Next Gen educational strategy.  “The roadmap for future innovation in education stemming from Project Athena is in place and we will begin to introduce changes to our education tools and delivery methods from September 2024 starting with CAP 1 and moving to CAP 2 and FAE,” says Donovan. “Some of the developments we’ll be seeing over the next two to three years will include real-time exams, which will bring more certainty to students as well as greater flexibility.  “Data analytics will be used to review students’ activities and performance on an ongoing basis so we can see how each of them is getting on in real-time and identify who might need help and support before their exams.” Global member outreach Chartered Accountants Ireland is Ireland’s largest and oldest professional accountancy body. Dating back to 1888, it represents over 31,700 members around the world and is currently educating more than 7,000 students.  It is an impressive reach and one Donovan plans to harness as she endeavours to highlight the vibrancy and variety of the profession in her role as President. “Above all, I want all of our members to know that they can reach out to me. It’s incredibly important to me to be accessible and plugged into what people are doing. I’m on social media channels, particularly LinkedIn, and I’m more than happy to engage with people, if they want to, any time,” she says. With members in more than 90 countries and active local chapters in international cities ranging from New York in the US and Sydney in Australia to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, the Institute has a healthy presence outside the island of Ireland. “My outreach work over the next 12 months will be international as well as national. I want to meet as many members as I can in the UK, the US, Australia and the Middle East – wherever I can get to, I will! “I worked in Australia myself back in the 1990s, so I know how much it means when a President or Officer Group visits from the Institute.  “When you’re away from home, your accountancy family becomes even more important and it’s just lovely to see the President and to see them interact with, and hear the views of, members overseas.” On home turf, Donovan’s itinerary will be no less busy as she has plans to visit, celebrate and engage with District Society members across the island. “We plan to hold our council meeting in November in Cork with a dinner in the evening for our members there and that’s very much along the lines of what I want to do throughout the next 12 months — just get out there and meet members as much as I can.” Beyond its own activities, Chartered Accountants Ireland offers a crucial voice to members on the world stage in professional, policy-related and regulatory matters relevant to its membership.  The Institute is a founding member of Chartered Accountants Worldwide, an international network of over one million chartered accountants. It also plays key roles in the Global Accounting Alliance, Accountancy Europe and the International Federation of Accountants.   Advocacy and representation will be another key priority for Donovan. “I’m very keen to continue growing and solidifying these relationships so that our members have the voice they deserve wherever it needs to be heard,” she says.  “I want to build on the relationships and reciprocity agreements we have with other corporate bodies throughout the globe and to make sure that we take every opportunity to let the younger generations we want to attract to the profession know that ours is a global qualification that can take them all over the world.”

Remote work has given trainee accountants a lot of freedom. However, that freedom comes with some challenges that can be overcome with balance, says Jack Deignan It’s easy to list the obvious joys of remote work. The increased levels of flexibility in daily routines, the total elimination of the pains of the commute and the comfort to be found in working from your own home.  There’s also something to be said of the lack of pressure that working from home allows. There is no expectation to get out of your pyjamas, and you can take solace in knowing your favourite mug is just down the hall.  It can be much easier to get into the rhythm of the day if you just need to walk from your bed to your desk.  Work and study challenges However, working remotely is not without its challenges.  The lack of social cohesion in teams when everyone works from home can impact performance. It’s also difficult to foster a sense of comradery if every interaction is facilitated through a screen.  Learning on the job has also become more difficult in some cases. It’s almost always more beneficial to ask someone to explain something face-to-face.  The same goes for studying. When the pressure is on, it can feel isolating to be away from people who are going through the same kind of juggling act between work, study and life. A proper balance Working remotely has created an opportunity to reflect on what is gained and lost when given a chance to work from home.  We must balance our work and study while utilising the advantages of remote working. When working from home, you can get lost in a task and continue working more than what would be considered healthy for proper work-life balance. It’s important to remember to take breaks—go for a walk, get a coffee and don’t worry about going to the GP or running to the post office if needed. Similarly, studying can take over your life when you don’t have people around you that can keep you in check. Take the initiative to meet fellow trainees for a study session at the office or a local café.  Alternatively, set up a Teams or Zoom study call, so you don’t have to leave home but still have a study group. Having flexibility doesn't mean forgetting when the work and study day ends—it means you get some of that time back for yourself. Enjoy it. Jack Deignan is a Risk Assurance Associate at PwC  

The roadmap for the EU Commission’s milestone Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is taking shape and now is the time to start preparing for a brave new era in non-financial reporting, writes Conor Holland With the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) now approved by the European Council, entities in the EU must begin to invest significant time and resources in preparing for the advent of a new era in non-financial reporting, which places the public disclosure of environmental, social affairs and governance matters (ESG) matters on a par with financial information. Under the CSRD, entities will have to disclose much more sustainability-related information about their business models, strategy and supply chains than they have to date. They will also need to report ESG information in a standardised format that can be assured by an independent third party. For those charged with governance, the CSRD will bring further augmented requirements. Audit committees will need to oversee new reporting processes and monitor the effectiveness of systems and controls setup. They will also have enhanced responsibilities. Along with monitoring an entity’s ESG reporting process, and evaluating the integrity of the sustainability information reported by that entity, audit committees will need to: Monitor the effectiveness of the entity’s internal quality control and risk management systems and internal audit functions; Monitor the assurance of annual and consolidated sustainability reporting; Inform the entity’s administrative or supervisory body of the outcome of the assurance of sustainability reporting; and Review and monitor the independence of the assurance provider. The CSRD stipulates the requirement for limited assurance over the reported information. However, it also includes the option for assurance requirements to evolve to reasonable assurance at a later stage. The EU estimates that 49,000 companies across the EU will fall under the requirements of the new CSRD Directive, compared to the 11,600 companies that currently have reporting obligations. The EU has confirmed that the implementation of the CSRD will take place in three stages: 1 January 2024 for companies already subject to the non-financial reporting directive (reporting in 2025 for the financial year 2024); 1 January 2025 for large companies that are not presently subject to the non-financial reporting directive (reporting in 2026 for the financial year 2025); 1 January 2026 for listed SMEs, small and non-complex credit institutions, and captive insurance undertakings (reporting in 2027 for the financial year 2026). A large undertaking is defined as an entity that exceeds at least two of the following criteria: A net turnover of €40 million A balance sheet total of €20 million 250 employees on average over the financial year The final text of the CSRD has also set timelines for when the Commission should adopt further delegated acts on reporting standards, with 30 June 2023 set as the date by which the Commission should adopt delegated acts specifying the information that undertakings will be required to report. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group In tandem, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) is working on a first set of draft sustainability reporting standards (ESRS). These draft standards will be ready for consideration by the Commission once the Parliament and Council have agreed a legislative text. The current draft standards provide an outline as to the depth and breadth of what entities will be required to report. Significantly, the ESRS should be considered as analogous to accountancy standards—with detailed disclosure requirements (qualitative and quantitative), a conceptual framework and associated application guidance. Readers should take note—the ESRS are much more than a handful of metrics supplementary to the financial statements. They represent a step change in what corporate reporting entails, moving non-financial information toward an equilibrium with financial information. Moreover, the reporting boundaries would be based on financial statements but expanded significantly for the upstream and downstream value chain, meaning an entity would need to capture material sustainability matters that are connected to the entity by its direct or indirect business relationships, regardless of its level of control over them. While the standards and associated requirements are now largely finalised, in early November 2022, EFRAG published a revised iteration to the draft ESRS, introducing certain changes to the original draft standards. While the broad requirements and content remain largely the same, some notable changes include: Structure of the reporting areas has been aligned with TCFD (Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures) and ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board) standards – specifically, the ESRS will be tailored around “governance”, “strategy”, “management of impacts, risks and opportunities”, and “metrics and targets”. Definition of financial materiality is now more closely aligned to ISSB standards. Impact materiality is more commensurate with the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) definition of impact materiality. Time horizons are now just a recommendation; entities may deviate and would disclose their entity-specific time horizons used. Incorporation of one governance standard into the cross-cutting standard requirements on the reporting area of governance. Slight reduction in the number of data points required within the disclosure requirements. ESRS and international standards By adopting double materiality principles, the proposed ESRS consider a wider range of stakeholders than IFRS® Sustainability Disclosure Standards or the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published proposal. Instead, they aim to meet public policy objectives as well as meeting the needs of capital markets. It is the ISSB’s aim to create a global baseline for sustainability reporting standards that allows local standard setters to add additional requirements (building blocks), rather than face a coexistence of multiple separate frameworks. The CSRD requires EFRAG to take account of global standard-setting initiatives to the greatest extent possible. In this regard, EFRAG has published a comparison with the ISSB’s proposals and committed to joining an ISSB working group to drive global alignment. However, in the short term, entities and investors may potentially have to deal with three sets of sustainability reporting standards in setting up their reporting processes, controls, and governance. Key differences The proposed ESRS list detailed disclosure requirements for all ESG topics. The proposed IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards would also require disclosure in relation to all relevant ESG topics, but the ISSB has to date only prepared a detailed exposure draft on climate, asking preparers to consider general requirements and other sources of information to report on other sustainability topics. The SEC focused on climate in its recent proposal. The proposed ESRS are more prescriptive, and the number of disclosure requirements significantly exceeds those in the proposed IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. Whereas the proposed IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards are intended to focus on the information needs of capital markets, ESRS also aim to address the policy objectives of the EU by addressing wider stakeholder needs. Given the significance of the directive—and the remaining time to get ready for it—entities should now start preparing for its implementation. It is important that entities develop plans to understand the full extent of the CSRD requirements, and the implications for their reporting infrastructure. As such, they should take some immediate steps to prepare, and consider: Performing a gap analysis—i.e. what the entity reports today, contrasted with what will be required under the CSRD. This is a useful exercise to inform entities on where resources should be directed, including how management identify sustainability-related information, and what KPIs they will be required to report on. Undertaking a ‘double materiality’ analysis to identify what topics would be considered material from an impact and financial perspective—as required under the CSRD. Get ‘assurance ready’—entities will need to be comfortable that processes and controls exist to support ESG information, and that the information can ultimately be assured. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive represents a fundamental change in the nature of corporate reporting—the time to act is now and the first deadline is closing in.