The Institute has today released Technical Release 02 2023 Solicitors Accounts Regulations 2023  This publication has been jointly developed by the member bodies of the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies – Ireland (CCAB-I), being the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, the Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. The Law Society have recently introduced new Solicitors Accounts Regulations, which came into operation on 1 July 2023, and apply to accounting periods beginning on or after that date. The new Regulations build on the 2014 Regulations and seek to increase protection for money held in client bank accounts. TR 02/2023 is intended to provide information for members undertaking reporting engagements in accordance with the Regulations. It replaces Technical Release 01/2016 Solicitors Accounts Regulations 2014 – Republic of Ireland. The Technical Release summarises some of the key requirements of the Regulations which are available on the website of the Law Society of Ireland.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has launched a consultation on revisions to the Ethical Standard. The proposed revisions enhance prohibitions where an audit firm's independence could be threatened. There are also changes proposed to reflect findings from audit inspections and enforcement cases, as well as changes to reflect developments in the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) since the FRC last revised the standard in 2019. The consultation remains open until 31 October 2023.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has issued its proposed International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA) 5000, General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements. This proposed standard will now undergo a consultation period running until 1 December 2023 and stakeholders are encouraged to respond and share their feedback to the proposed standard. ISSA 5000 is a principles-based, overarching standard suitable for both limited and reasonable assurance engagements on sustainability information reported across any sustainability topic. It is intended to work with various sustainability reporting frameworks (including the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards). The standard is drafted as a profession agnostic standard and should be suitable for use by accountant and non-accountant assurance practitioners. With the sustainability reporting requirements for certain entities set to increase over the coming years, a standalone sustainability standard is seen as a key piece of the framework to help ensure that users of sustainability information can place greater trust in the information they are consuming on an entities Environmental, Social and Governance impacts. In launching the consultation, IAASB Chair Tom Seidenstein commented “Our proposed ISSA 5000 is a crucial step in enhancing confidence and trust in sustainability reporting. This proposal directly responds to the International Organization of Securities Commissions recommendations and complements the work of other standard setters, including the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants,”. The comment period remains open until 1 December and the IAASB are seeking a broad range of views on the standard to gather the views and insights needed to finalise it.

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions I am an experienced manager who is comfortable with delegating work and trusting my team to get on with it. This allows me to keep a strategic focus. I moved to a new organisation recently and find that my manager and other senior leaders expect me to have detailed knowledge of the work of my direct reports. I do not want to get sucked into operational detail. How do I stay high level while keeping my seniors happy? I always put options on a continuum of ‘do nothing’ (i.e. comply) to ‘the nuclear option’ (i.e. leave), and then identify the options in between.  Before you begin, reflect carefully on what is important for you so that you can shape a clear and positive message. Watch the language – are you ‘getting sucked into the operational detail’ or ‘on top of the data’? My guess is that this is a cultural issue, and if you want to effect change, you need to remain credible. Reflect on what the seniors need: do they need you to have information at your fingertips to save them time? To make important decisions? Are there trust issues around work done by more junior people? Is there something else?  Working this out will help you to meet seniors where they are (not where they ‘should’ be). Ask your manager for their support in meeting expectations while contributing at a higher level (focus on both/and rather than either/or). Bring the same question to your team and get their input and solutions. Reflect on your own expectations – you may need to give a little.  Identify the colleague who navigates this most effectively – ask them how they do it. Build the profile of your team: bring them to meetings. Find a reason to host an event at which your team members share their insights, demonstrate their capabilities and build relationships with your seniors. There may be practical solutions. Could you contact seniors before meetings to check if there are issues they want to discuss? Maybe you could create a shared folder where updated information is posted (either so that you can access it quickly – or colleagues can access it). There are a few options in between. There are many more. Just be open to looking for them. Two colleagues who don’t get on keep trying to drag me into their issues. I feel caught in the middle. In such cases, tapping into our sincerity often gives us the clarity and courage to address tough issues. My guess is that you want to support both without siding with either. Imagine one of your colleagues is sitting in front of you. What would you most like to say? It might be “I am uncomfortable as I feel stuck in the middle” or “That sounds difficult. How can I help you to address this with him?” or “It can be hard to work with someone whose style is so different”.  Try it and see what comes out. Then whittle that down to a sincere and helpful response. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant at Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and  team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie.

Audit committees face increasingly complex risks in modern business, according to the latest KPMG survey. Arlene Harris speaks to Niall Savage about the four main risks and how committees can mitigate them KMPG recently published the results of its Global Audit Committee (AC) Institute survey, which collates the views of 768 AC members and chairs, of which 31 were operating in Ireland.  Niall Savage, Partner and Head of Audit Markets at KPMG, says the survey results indicate that, while it may seem at odds with its traditional role, the AC and its members continue to have a “bellwether role for the business as they scan the risk horizon”.  Consequently, ongoing geopolitical issues, cyber threats, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and considerations around environmental, social, and governance (ESG) will remain top of the AC agenda in the coming months. “The traditional and essential role of an AC is overseeing the numbers, controls and, as its title suggests, the audit process – both internal and external,” he says. “So its priority is more in the monitoring than the advising. This work is critical for ensuring financial transparency, confidence and compliance but does not encompass the broader aspects of business. “However, given the typical composition of the AC, the external non-executives with wide-ranging experience, the effective AC Chairperson draws upon the insights of their members to identify and advise on risk areas and strategies to address them.  “The findings suggest that the things driving the agenda of the AC are big-picture risks that underpin their organisations’ strategies. And four key themes – geopolitical, cyber, AI and ESG – were identified as foremost in the minds of AC members.” Indeed, these four themes don’t come without challenges, but there are ways in which ACs can navigate them in their role, supporting the board and management. The effects of risk on the market “Volatility by its nature creates uncertainty in the market, making it difficult for businesses and their stakeholders to make strategic operational and investment decisions,” says Savage. “For example, consumer sentiment in uncertain times can fall rapidly, with non-essential purchases frequently deferred, impacting large parts of the consumer market and leisure industries. “Geopolitical volatility can also undermine investor confidence, cutting off access to finance and creating barriers for businesses through restricted access to markets, currency fluctuations and shifts in trade policies. There is also a heightened risk of supply chain disruption.” In the last 12 months, ACs have been faced with:  post-lockdown uncertainty, which is driving cashflow forecasts (and risks) of how to meet consumer demands; geopolitical conflicts, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, necessitating a rapid response to secure the safety of people and assess the impact on the business in addition to instability in Latin America and the Middle East; rapid and often unexpected inflation across energy, wheat and other commodities, which created unforeseen risks of business failure if these could not be passed on easily; increased interest rate rises and global financial market fluctuations in response to inflation, which changed base case forecasts for investment decisions, funding, and potentially going concerns; ongoing global trade tensions, including those between the US and China, with increasing tariffs, which had ripple effects on global supply chains; and the fallout from COVID and Brexit, which continued to affect the global economy. Geopolitical risks “It is difficult to predict what the next 12 months have in store, but some key actions for AC members to manage these risks include engaging with management and stakeholders to understand their assessment of geopolitical risks and existing strategies to mitigate those risks, and asking management to provide timely updates on geopolitical developments and the organisation’s risk mitigation efforts,” said Savage.   “Also, understanding the geopolitical risks that can impact the organisation and monitoring global political developments, regional tensions, trade disputes, regulatory changes and other geopolitical factors that may have implications for the organisation. “And, staying informed about current events and diplomatic developments that can impact the organisation’s operations – along with knowing if the organisation is especially exposed to certain regions or risks, should the AC consider recruitment or training to ensure that they have the expertise to address any challenges they face, is also important.” Savage also suggests assessing an organisation’s exposure to geopolitical risks, understanding management’s approach to contingency planning, and understanding the full list of regulatory compliance requirements and whether the organisation has processes in place to identify, monitor and adhere to applicable regulations.  ACs must also consider with management the need for scenario planning to model impact and respond to geopolitical events. Cyber risks Advances in modern technology have also brought about a growing number of cyber threats, and in the past 12 months, many Irish businesses and organisations have reported data leaks and thefts as cybercriminals become more sophisticated and professional in their approach to both getting access to systems through ransomware and social engineering but also monetising this access.  As firms try to protect themselves from this, the list of targets and potential weaknesses continues to grow with the proliferation of the internet of things (IoT), which may not have the same level of security and is, therefore, easier to compromise. “For those engaged in public work, there is an additional political dimension and risk to cybercrime with nation state targeting for political gain, which has seen recent coverage of European Commission staff removing certain apps from their phone restrictions on Telco suppliers due to concerns over security,” says Savage. “But there are some essential actions that ACs can take, which include understanding the cyber risk landscape, the type of threats it faces, potential vulnerabilities and the impact of a cyber incident.  “They can also evaluate the organisation’s cybersecurity governance and strategy while focusing on risk assessment, incident response, training and vendor competence. It is important to be informed – stay on top of cybersecurity initiatives and maintain open lines of communication to address any concerns or gaps identified.” He would also encourage organisations to consider engaging external cybersecurity experts or conducting independent audits/penetration testing to assess the effectiveness of these controls, to ensure the AC is informed of cybersecurity incidents and evaluate the organisation’s response and promote cybersecurity awareness through training and incident reporting and ensure that appropriate cybersecurity risk reporting mechanisms are in place. AI risks The advent of AI has brought a new set of risks to business. “Although long discussed and the subject of many films (Terminator 2 springs to mind), the potential impact of AI really hit home late last year with the launch of ChatGPT, which was quickly followed with spectacular claims of cost savings, entire professions wiped out and of course the danger of ‘the rise of the machines’,” says Savage. “Clearly, there are significant risks and opportunities for businesses and ACs to deal with, many of which are ‘unknown unknowns’ to combat this and assess risk.” In the face of this new business landscape, “ACs should understand the concerns and opportunities for people, customers, suppliers and regulators. They should try to understand how best to get the right level of knowledge, evaluate the existing risk management framework to assess whether additional controls are needed, consider policies around the implementation and use of AI and review critical AI implementation projects.” ESG risks The final issue Savage addresses is ESG, which he says has been an “alphabet soup of regulation” for the past few years – and KPMG research indicates compliance with standards is only one of the ESG risks occupying the minds of AC members.  “There is a broader menu of risks to consider, which impact reputation, performance and financial success,” he says. “Failure to address these can lead to reputational damage and financial implications. So, AC members should consider the potential reputational risks associated with the company’s ESG performance and how they are managed. Climate change risks can impact the value of assets, and non-compliance can result in fines or penalties.”  To address these risks, it is important for ACs to understand and work closely with all stakeholders including management and internal auditors. Areas of focus should: ensure the AC has the necessary expertise to effectively assess ESG risks – this may involve recruiting or training existing committee members; engage with investors, regulatory bodies and industry associations to understand their expectations and perspectives on ESG; develop a list and understanding of ESG risks relevant to the company across climate change, labour, data and inclusion and diversity; review how data is currently captured and analysed and how reporting is verified; look at the existing risk management practices and policies and assess the key controls and how the risks are currently monitored and reported; benchmark these to peer groups and industry standards to ascertain whether they align with recognised frameworks; and seek regular updates on ESG initiatives and consider external assurance on related reporting.  “There are more insights to the survey, and it is interesting to benchmark different priorities across the regions, priorities around finance team talent, the need for in-person time with management and a focusing agenda to maximise effectiveness,” says Savage. “However, by elaborating on and identifying some common-sense actions on the four critical themes – geopolitical, cyber, AI and ESG – we have supported AC members for the next, hopefully, less volatile, 12 months.”  

The NATO summit was not only about Ukraine. It was about the role of the past and how it affects NATO and the EU, writes Judy Dempsey By the time you read this, we’ll have all moved on from the NATO summit that took place in the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius in July towards other persistent topics.  There’s Ireland’s housing crisis; the worry that Donald Trump might beat President Joe Biden in the 2024 election for the White House; and Russia’s continuing war against Ukraine, to name a few. The list is long. But a common threat runs through these issues: the enduring role of the past and how societies in the 21st century have to deal with it. The past is a compass. It offers the way to the future if there is a political willingness to deal with history. The past can also be distorted.  That sense of the past was clear when attending the NATO summit.  The summit’s conclusions fell short – for some, way too short – by failing to offer Ukraine membership of the US-led military alliance once the war was over.  Lithuania and the other two Baltic States, Estonia and Latvia, but also Poland and the Czech Republic, were disappointed. They believed that Biden and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who led the opposition against a membership date, did not have the political courage or historical compass to offer Ukraine at least a timetable.  The bottom line is that, for different reasons, this decision was about Russia.  Biden, who is facing re-election and simmering unpopularity with American support for Ukraine, does not want to drag NATO into a direct confrontation with Russia. Germany thinks the same but is not committed to admitting Ukraine to NATO. Yet, this war has given Germany a big chance to lead Europe and create a strong NATO caucus inside the alliance. Germany demurred.  This brings us to Lithuania.  It has been a staunch ally of the Belarussian opposition and an unremitting supporter of Ukraine. For Lithuania, it is about Kyiv defeating Russia. But it is more than that. Lithuania and the other Baltic States see the war in Ukraine through the prism of Russia but in a special way, distinct from Western Europe.  For Lithuania, this is about Russia trying to regain control over the countries of Eastern Europe, which include not only Ukraine but also Belarus, Moldova, Georgia and Armenia.  Lithuania also sees Russia aiming to create a new cordon sanitaire between the EU/NATO countries and Eastern Europe – a kind of updated version of the Cold War divisions of Europe.  In the view of the Central Europeans, Russia’s imperial ambitions must be stopped. Eastern Europe must not be turned into a grey Russian-controlled zone. The prospects for instability would be too high and dangerous. Germany and the United States, for their part, see the war in Ukraine through the prism of Russia as a nuclear power and threat – as if Russia is not already threatening the security of Europe. They do not see it in terms of the past but in terms of realpolitik. For Central Europe, the past is the legacy of the violent Soviet occupation of the region that must not be repeated in Ukraine.  The past for Western Europe is how, with huge American support, today’s EU was built. It was a peace project constructed upon the ruins of World War Two. This peace project is now being challenged by Russia. The war in Ukraine is about two different European narratives. It is time to reconcile them.  Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe  

As we approach the final months of 2023, three Chartered Accountants take a moment to contemplate the hurdles Ireland has surmounted and share their aspirations for the remainder of the year Sinéad Nolan Financial Accountant AXA Insurance The economy is fine on paper (GDP and domestically); however, housing is a major issue, in both affordability and availability. The cost-of-living crisis is only exacerbating a problem that was already there for young professionals starting off their careers. Paying rent is a continuous challenge, as is looking for an affordable house to purchase. The interest rates keep rising, and house prices don’t seem to be reducing. Many in the country felt the challenge of paying bills in the wintertime. On top of that, there has been a lot of uncertainty with the war in Ukraine.  On the plus side, there has recently been slight moderation in the price of energy and in inflation, and the pleasant weather in June was a bonus! (Less pleasant in July, admittedly.) Also, the unemployment rate in the Republic of Ireland fell to a record low of 3.8 percent in May. To help, my employer has hosted many financial wellness webinars, which, given the current economic crisis, have been great.  We also received a well-being day off, not to mention personal interaction is happening in the office again – we are attending social events, which is brilliant.  As for the rest of the year, I hope the housing crisis settles, and there is more support given to first-time house buyers from the Government. I joined the Young Professionals Committee in July after attending the wonderful Pride BBQ in June. I am looking forward to organising and hosting events, and connecting with other members of the Institute. The Young Professionals Committee is a great networking platform, so I am very excited to get stuck in with it. Jim Stafford Consultant Friel Stafford I work every day at the coalface, advising companies and individuals who are dealing with financial challenges, and thus I appreciate the issues facing the economy.  While there is an economic brew of uncertainty caused by inflation, geopolitical issues, etc., the biggest impact we have seen this year has been the dramatic increase in interest rates, which has shaken some people to the core.  We have observed a noticeable increase in Members Voluntary Liquidations from businesspeople who are deciding to ‘cash in their chips’ now rather than face future uncertainty.   One of the positives that I have always enjoyed when working with people under financial pressure is recognising the levels of resilience people have. On the ‘resilience spectrum’, I am delighted to see some clients who bounce back stronger than ever.   The highlight for me personally this year was the sale of Friel Stafford to Ifac, which will enable us to provide restructuring services such as the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP) across Ifac’s 30+ offices.  The association with Ifac has moved us into the top ten accountancy firms in Ireland, which has opened the doors to certain types of work, making it easier for us to attract and retain talent.  A big development during the year was the growth of artificial intelligence (AI). While there is great potential for generative AI to change the workplace, there is also huge scope for more sophisticated fraud.  Looking to the year ahead, a big challenge for some businesses will be the ending of the Revenue warehousing scheme, which was a valuable lifeline for many.  We expect to see an increased number of SCARPs next year.  Another big challenge for some firms will be the Companies Registration Office and the Corporate Enforcement Authority increasing their enforcement activity on companies that are struck off. Gordon Naughton  Chief Executive Officer Tactive   January represented a strange and uncertain time for the Irish and global economy. Many initiatives were placed on hiatus due to significant inflationary, economic and geopolitical concerns.  In January, it was startling to see how quickly the mood had shifted from November and December. Since then, the business community and consumers have learned to live with these concerns and are in a positive state of mind.  Currently, the Irish economy is showing tremendous resilience, with the overall tax intake and consumer spending being unexpectedly high. It seems the country is forging ahead. However, if the past three years are a barometer for future challenges, predicted and day-to-day issues tend to be easy to deal with. It’s the unpredicted challenges that can pose the most difficulty.  My key lesson from this period is that businesses need to be agile, efficient and have contingency plans for the three main ways an economy can move – up, down or steady on.  Luckily, I have great clients, a good support structure and network that has brought me through any uncertainty. I am so lucky to work from home and spend time with my wonderful family.  Continuous learning is a facet of my life, as I simply like reading and expanding my knowledge. This year I obtained a black belt in Lean, which has helped me professionally and personally.  As for the rest of 2023, I hope to continue to work with outstanding clients.   

In today’s rapidly changing world, organisations are embracing inclusive leadership. Karin Lanigan explores what it means, why it matters, and the essential traits of effective inclusive leaders As a result of recent seismic and lasting changes in the workplace, many organisations are now adopting an inclusive approach to leadership. What is inclusive leadership, and why does it matter? A complex and diverse world We are operating in an increasingly complex world that is constantly evolving. The pace and enormity of the changes taking place require a different approach to leadership: inclusive leadership. A new leadership style is required To be an effective leader now requires a move away from a traditional style of leadership to an inclusive leadership approach. This doesn’t mean that the conventional aspects of leadership are defunct. In fact, the core fundamentals of leadership still apply. However, moving to inclusive leadership involves a change from an autocratic, top-down, centralised leadership approach to a more decentralised, democratic, shared and participative process involving employees across all levels of the organisation. Traits of an inclusive leader An inclusive leader is aware of their own biases and proactively seeks out, encourages and considers different perspectives to facilitate better decision making and more effective collaboration. They strive to ensure that colleagues are treated equally, feel a sense of belonging and value, and work in a psychologically safe space where they can contribute and are supported to achieve their full potential. There is no doubt that inclusive leadership is now a critical capability. The core skills and competencies that are typically exhibited by inclusive leaders include: Self-awareness. Inclusive leaders have a strong awareness of their own biases and blind spots. Similarly, a high level of emotional intelligence enabling the effective management of emotions, their own and those of others, is fundamental.  Empathy. Being an inclusive leader requires having both the willingness and capacity to comprehend and acknowledge the emotions and viewpoints of others. Cultural intelligence. Inclusive leaders aim to establish a workplace that welcomes and values all cultures, allowing everyone to make meaningful contributions. This requires a sense of curiosity and a willingness to learn about different cultures and their traditions. Communication. Clear and effective communication supports an inclusive leadership style. Inclusive leaders look to understand and adapt their communication style to be understood by a diverse audience.  Collaboration. Inclusive leaders foster an environment that is psychologically safe, enabling every member to contribute their ideas and innovations to achieve better outcomes. Commitment and courage. Inclusive leaders are role models, challenge the status quo, and advocate for others.   Why does inclusive leadership matter? Much research has been conducted to assess the benefits of inclusive leadership. The results point to increased staff engagement, attraction and retention; improved workplace relations, communication and collaboration; enhanced transparency resulting in higher levels of trust; better decision-making and problem-solving arising from more varied insights and contributions; and increased innovation and creativity by bringing diverse skills and perspectives together. Ultimately, inclusive leaders significantly enhance employee engagement, performance and overall business results. There is no doubt that inclusive leadership is now a critical and unique capability and one that can support career progression and the achievement of personal and corporate potential.  Karin Lanigan is Head of Member Experience at Chartered Accountants Ireland

The Digital Services Act aims to better protect users in the online world, but its requirements will impose many new obligations on service providers, say Mary Loughney, Shane O’Neill and Filipa Sequeira The increased use of digital technology dramatically raises the chances of end users being exposed to illegal or harmful online content. Regulations and laws are catching up with the fast-paced world of emerging digital services and online platforms to ensure online services’ security, accountability and openness.  The Digital Services Act (DSA), an EU regulation, aims to modernise the digital landscape and defend users’ rights. What digital services does the DSA cover? The DSA encompasses a broad range of online intermediaries, including internet service providers, cloud services, messaging platforms, marketplaces and social networks.  Hosting services, such as online platforms (a hosting service provider that “stores and disseminates to the public information, unless that activity is a minor or purely secondary feature of another service”), social networks, content-sharing platforms, online marketplaces and travel/accommodation platforms, have specific due diligence obligations.  The DSA’s most significant regulations target very large online platforms, with a substantial societal and economic impact reaching a minimum of 45 million EU users, representing 10 percent of the population.  Similarly, very large online search engines with over 10 percent of the EU’s 450 million consumers will have greater responsibility for combating illegal content on the internet. Key provisions of the DSA The DSA outlines specific responsibilities for online platforms, including big platforms, intermediaries and hosting service providers.  Due to their significant societal impact, the Act introduces categories called Very Large Online Platforms (VLOP) and Very Large Online Search Engines (VLOSE), which are subject to stricter regulations and audit requirements.  An independent audit must cover all the obligations imposed on VLOPs and VLOSEs by the DSA, including the duties to remove illegal content, provide users with transparency about how their data is used and prevent the spread of disinformation.  The following focus areas are central to the DSA’s requirements: Due diligence around safety and content moderation: The DSA lays out guidelines to address illegal content, such as hate speech, terrorist propaganda and fake goods. Online platforms must set up efficient content moderation systems and offer ways for users to report unlawful content. This may involve using automated tools for detection and removal. User rights and transparency about terms of service, consent, algorithms and advertising practices: Companies must offer more transparency about how their platforms operate, including their terms of service, algorithms and advertising practices. This will help users to understand how their data is being used. Users’ ability to control their privacy settings and flag harmful content: Companies must provide users with tools to manage their privacy settings and flag harmful content. This will help users to protect their personal data and keep themselves safe online. Companies are also required to respond to flagged content within a reasonable timeframe. Measures to prevent the spread of disinformation: Companies must take steps to prevent the spread of disinformation, such as by labelling sponsored content and providing users with access to reliable information. This may involve working with fact-checking organisations or other companies to share information about disinformation. Accountability for the content hosted on platforms: Companies must be accountable for the content hosted on their platforms. This means they must be able to remove illegal content promptly and co-operate with law enforcement authorities. With these provisions in mind, a sensible place to begin your journey may involve conducting a maturity assessment using a risk-based approach so the organisation is aware of the risks that require mitigation: Maturity assessment: The risk assessment should consider a range of factors, such as the nature of the platform, the type of content hosted and the potential for harm to users. Address DSA requirement gaps: As a result of the risk assessment, organisations should identify their exposed risks and implement necessary measures, which include enhancing content moderation tooling, increasing transparency and enabling more robust end-user control mechanisms. Compliance reporting: Organisations would be required to comply with third-party external audits. While that audit would evaluate the platform’s systems and processes, compliance reporting may also include information on overall risk mitigation efforts. The challenging aspects of the DSA’s audit requirements To ensure compliance with the DSA’s provisions, digital service providers, predominantly VLOPs and VLOSEs, will be subject to independent audits. The audit must be conducted in accordance with the methodology and templates established in the delegated regulation, and the audit should review whether the VLOP or VLOSE: has a clear and transparent policy on how it addresses illegal content; has a system in place for detecting and removing illegal content and preventing the spread of disinformation; and provides users with adequate transparency about how their data is used. The audits will evaluate the platform’s efforts to deal with illegal content, the openness of content moderation procedures, adherence to DSA requirements, and the efficiency of user reporting mechanisms. The platform’s practices for data security and privacy will also be examined.  It will be challenging for online intermediaries to comply with some DSA requirements.  Accurate classification of digital services The DSA distinguishes between different types of digital services, such as intermediaries, hosting services and online platforms. Assigning the correct classification to a specific service can be complex, especially for hybrid platforms with multiple functionalities. Accurately defining the obligations and responsibilities associated with each classification requires careful analysis. Removing illegal content in a timely manner The DSA requires the removal of unlawful content in a timely manner after being made aware of its existence. Implementing effective content moderation mechanisms while respecting freedom of expression and avoiding over-removal or under-removal of content is a complex task. Developing sophisticated algorithms and human review processes to strike the right balance poses significant technical and operational challenges.  Further transparency about how content is moderated  The DSA requires more transparency about how online intermediaries moderate content. This includes providing information about the criteria used to moderate content, the processes used to make decisions and the appeals process available to users who flag moderation issues.  It can be difficult to require online intermediaries to disclose sensitive information about their internal operations. Additional steps to protect users’ privacy rights  The DSA requires additional steps to protect users’ privacy and enhance users’ rights. This includes transparency, user control over content and redress mechanisms.  These new provisions can be challenging to implement as they require online intermediaries to change their business practices significantly.  Implementing user-friendly interfaces and operative-complaint resolution mechanisms to ensure seamless user experiences can be technically complex and resource intensive. Compliance with new rules on targeted advertising  The DSA introduces new rules on targeted advertising. These rules prohibit online intermediaries from using sensitive personal data to target users with ads, and they require online intermediaries to give users more control over the ads they see.  Co-operation with authorities The DSA emphasises co-operation between platforms and regulatory authorities.  Ensuring information sharing, responding to legitimate requests and establishing effective communication channels with various national authorities across the EU pose many challenges. Maintaining confidentiality and data protection while complying with these requirements can be tricky. Interpretation of the DSA The interpretation of the DSA may evolve as it undergoes the legislative process. As such, there are themes associated with how one might expect an audit will be conducted: Transparency: The audits must be conducted transparently. Accountability: The audits are designed to ensure that VLOPs and VLOSEs are accountable for compliance with the DSA. Effectiveness: The audits must effectively identify and address any compliance gaps. Proportionality: The audits must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the VLOPS and VLOSEs. Flexibility: The delegated regulation allows auditors to adapt the audit methodology to the specific circumstances of the VLOP or the VLOSE. These are just some specific requirements that are tricky and complicated to implement. However, the DSA is essential to creating a safer and more accountable online environment. Best practice The table above displays exemplary and tactical actions that could be considered when enhancing users’ privacy rights and transparency about terms of service, consent, algorithms and advertising practices. In addition to these specific steps, companies should consider implementing several general best practices: A well-defined risk management framework: Establishing ongoing risk assessment activities will help companies identify and mitigate user risks. A culture of compliance: This will help ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the DSA requirements and committed to complying with them. A robust process for responding to incidents: This will help companies to respond quickly and effectively to any incidents that may arise. An oversight process for monitoring and reporting on compliance: This will help companies track their progress and identify areas where they may need to improve. A trustworthy online environment The DSA represents a significant step toward regulating online platforms and digital services within the EU. By introducing audit requirements, the DSA enhances transparency, accountability and user protection in the digital world. Independent audits will serve as a mechanism to ensure compliance with the DSA’s provisions, thereby fostering a safer, fairer and more trustworthy online environment. Mary Loughney is Director and Head of Technology Risk Consulting at Grant Thornton  Shane O’Neill is Partner and Head  of Technical Change, Financial Services Advisory at Grant Thornton  Filipa Sequeira is Senior Consultant of Financial Services Advisory at Grant Thornton

Maria McHugh shares how she set boundaries, shed the notion that she “can do it all”, and that achieving a successful career while prioritising family is possible with the right mindset and support Growing up, I had a keen interest in business and enterprise. Because of this, I completed a BSc in Finance at University College Cork, and, after considering career options, I felt that becoming a Chartered Accountant was the best fit for me and a good start to my business career.  This, however, wasn’t without its challenges. Coming back after a break Like many women, I had to make a decision about having children and consider how my career would be impacted.  Between 2014 and 2021, my husband and I had three children, and during that time, we decided that I would be a full-time stay-at-home mum because of a lack of childcare availability.  This unplanned, seven-year break in my career had a much bigger impact on me mentally than I ever would have thought. I felt that I had lost my professional self. I didn’t realise how important that identity was to me.  I watched as my peers’ careers progressed and felt left behind.  After seven years at home, I started to consider what returning to work would look like; frankly, it was terrifying.  I suffered from post-natal depression after my second baby, and it left me with low confidence and self-belief. Thankfully, earlier in my career, I met Karin Lanigan in Member Services at Chartered Accountants Ireland, and I always remembered her openness and honesty.  Personal priorities While I wanted my career back on track, it was also important that I continue to be available for my children. I lost my mum at 13 years old, so it has always been especially important to me to be at home for my children. I had to consider what type of professional role I wanted and how to balance my work and home life.  I felt passionate about helping start-ups, sole traders and being involved in local enterprises. Having completed the Chartered Accountants Ireland Diploma in Tax in 2018, opening my accountancy and tax practice seemed the best fit for me and the family.  I was excited by the prospect, but I was also incredibly overwhelmed, daunted, and the self-doubt and fear were crippling.  I had three small children, was moving from Dublin back to my native Dungarvan, and was now opening my own practice. It seemed insurmountable. Karin guided me in breaking the tasks into manageable steps and helped me see that this was achievable. Professional Standards and Practice Consulting were also very supportive, and I was delighted that so much support was offered by Chartered Accountants Ireland.  While on my journey back into the workplace, I was really heartened by all the supports that were available through the Institute, and I hope these only grow and extend to more women.  In some ways, I think women put themselves under too much pressure with the social narrative that “we can do it all”. I think we are our own worst critics, and we can each have an expectation for ourselves that we should be doing everything, and when we don’t, we think we are failing.   This perception is false and needs to change. It is OK to choose to stay at home with young children, and that  decision should not feel detrimental to our career or be something we need to explain or justify.  For me, it is all about balance, and this is personal to every family. We are all just doing our best to have a career in whatever way possible to suit our family life.  Setting boundaries Since I started my business, I have always had the mindset that I am going at my own pace.  The aim of having my own practice was that I could balance both my career and my family life but I recognised early on that working in my practice full time was just not going to work for my family. As a result, I learned how to say no. I created boundaries around my work schedule, especially during school holidays, and I don’t apologise  for it.  I sometimes think that women feel they need to be singularly career-orientated and driven to succeed to be taken seriously or that admitting the kids come first is a weakness. I don’t agree at all.  At the start of the summer, I announced on social media that I was taking a step back from work for the school summer holidays. The support from peers and clients was fantastic. People told me that my being upfront about the summer break was refreshing and inspired other parents to do the same.  It’s like anything – if you don’t see it being done, you don’t realise you can do it. This doesn’t mean that I am not career-driven or don’t have aspirations for my own business. But this is a marathon, not a sprint, and I will do it in my own time. Building your tribe Networking is vital to sole practitioners for promoting themselves and, more importantly, building solid support. When I started my practice, I had no colleagues to bounce ideas off or to ask questions. I feel strongly that this kind of support is important for my personal development, so I reached out to a fellow mum in practice from my PwC days and asked how she would feel about coming together to set up a small group.  We now have a core group of four accountants (also mums) in practice. We support each other, answer technical questions and get opinions on issues we come across. This group has been vital to growing my confidence and has shown me that there are others also dealing with the same problems. In my experience, the most important qualities for women in business are self-belief and self-confidence.  I am a great champion of women and our abilities but I have struggled with self-confidence in the last few years. When left unchecked, this self-doubt can be very limiting.  I would love to see the topic of low self-confidence as ways to manage it spoken about more. My self-confidence has grown over time, but it is something I work on and still struggle with to this day.  The more it is discussed, the more women will realise, like me, that they are not alone in this mental battle.  I am also very lucky to be a member of the 2023 Chamber of the Year, Dungarvan and West Waterford Chamber. Through this membership I have found another group of like-minded women on their own business journey. We support each other, attend events together and help each other when we can.  Finding your tribe in business is so important and having that sense of community and support from different groups has had a positive impact on my own business and personal development. Maria McHugh is Founder Owner of McHugh Accounting and Consultancy

Recent European heatwaves have highlighted the impact climate change has on society and the economy. Susan Rossney explores the challenges facing Irish businesses when taking steps to tackle the crisis Recent severe heatwaves in continental Europe have shown how the effects of global warming are coming ever closer to home. Forced migration, drought, forest fires and biodiversity loss are some of the many ways climate change will impact Irish society.  Its impact on the economy will be acute, affecting everything from the health and wellness of employees to the cost of raw materials, scarcity of resources and supply chain disruption.  Ireland and climate change Climate change poses risks to humans, nature and Ireland as a nation.  Ireland is legally bound to meet ambitious national and international climate targets. According to the Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC), an independent advisory body, Ireland will not meet the climate targets it has set for itself in the first and second carbon budget periods. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) provisional estimates on 2022 greenhouse gas emissions show that Ireland already used 47 percent of the carbon budget for 2021–2025 in the past two years.  An annual reduction of 12.4 percent is now required for each of the remaining years if Ireland is to stay within budget.  However, as emissions fell only 1.9 percent in 2022, this has been described as “extremely challenging” by the EPA.  It is clear that action is required across all sectors of the economy and society, including: Mitigation: reducing activity that causes climate change, like burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas); and Adaptation: making changes to deal with the effects of climate change, from operational changes to cope with rising summer temperatures or winter flooding to factoring in the risk of developing stranded assets and increased carbon tax liabilities. Ireland’s perception of climate change According to Climate Change in the Irish Mind, EPA research conducted in 2021, most Irish citizens share a desire for action on the climate crisis.  However, other EPA research has found that our emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) continue to rise.  Environmental Indicators Ireland 2022, published by the Central Statistics Office (CSO), shows that Ireland’s 2022 emissions were 11 percent higher than in 1990.  Enterprises contributed an estimated 12.7 percent to Ireland’s overall emissions in 2018, according to the Climate Action Plan 2023. Although this is less than the contributions of other sectors, there remains a need for Ireland’s enterprises to take action to reduce their emissions.  However, a 2022 national survey of 380 SMEs and larger enterprises across industry and service sectors by Microsoft and University College Cork found that Irish businesses are underprepared to make the necessary changes to transition to a net zero future. According to the study, 86 percent have no commitments or targets to decarbonise.  Barriers to action  In the face of evidence of climate change – and Ireland’s willingness to take action – what is preventing Irish businesses from responding to the crisis?  As an issue, climate change is complicated, abstract and overwhelming. Multiple interdependent factors cause it, and it is nearly impossible to avoid contributing to it in our daily lives. Buying products, driving a car or taking a flight for a foreign family holiday (full disclosure: I’m just back from one) all add to the overall problem. The solutions to the climate crisis are also interdependent and complicated. The positive changes we can make as individuals can feel insignificant, especially compared with large countries’ continued pollution.  The European Commission’s Annual Report on European SMEs 2021/22 – SMEs and environmental sustainability identified access to finance, limited expertise and skills, and regulatory and administrative barriers among the challenges facing SMEs in particular. Businesses that want to take climate action often have limited time, cash flow, resources and support (both financial and non-financial) to take action.  Knowledge is also a barrier. Many professionals qualified at a time when climate change was not identified as a business risk. They now find themselves having to skill up mid-career in an area that is famous for changing frequently.  Finally, many citizens and businesses are still struggling with crises related to COVID-19, inflationary pressure, supply chain disruption and high energy costs. Staying afloat is a crisis in itself.  Firms, particularly SMEs, focusing on the practicalities of running a business, paying staff and grappling with cash flow and costs are more likely to see climate action as the responsibility of governments or, at the very least, large corporations rather than them.  On top of that, climate discussions are often politicised. They are regularly reduced to a ‘them vs us’ polarised debate in mainstream media rather than discussing how everyone can work together to deliver solutions.  Threats and opportunities  For businesses, climate change presents both threats and opportunities.  Threats The threats have been categorised as physical risks (both ‘acute’ and ‘chronic’) and transitional risks.  Opportunities  Taking action on the climate crisis enables businesses to restore lost ecosystems, improve air quality, community health and well-being, and avail of the opportunity to make a lasting positive impact. There are additional advantages to consider: Reduced costs – the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) estimates that the average SME can save up to 30 percent on its energy bill by becoming more energy efficient (improved heating and lighting, lower maintenance of electric vehicles, efficient water and materials management and using recycled materials with a lower climate impact all contribute to lower costs);  Reduced reliance on exposure to fluctuating oil and gas prices from switching from fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) to renewable energy sources; Reduced exposure to carbon tax, which is increasing €7.50 per tonne to €100 per tonne in 2030; Access to grants, allowances and tax reliefs; Improved access to capital and finance from investors and lending looking to ‘green’ their portfolios; and A competitive edge in attracting talent, clients and customers. Steps to climate action Businesses looking to take action on the climate crisis can take several steps: Build your knowledge. There are many resources out there, several provided by the Government and Chartered Accountants Ireland. Begin measuring emissions with tools like the Government’s Climate Toolkit for Business.  Consider an internal energy audit to find ways of reducing your carbon footprint. SEAI maintains a list of registered energy auditors and offers SMEs a €2,000 voucher towards the audit cost. Consider setting up an internal environment and climate impact team to devise a decarbonisation plan.  See also the Sustainability Glossary in the Sustainability Centre of the Chartered Accountants Ireland website.  For more, see www.charteredaccountants.ie/sustainability-centre/sustainability-home Susan Rossney is Sustainability Officer at Chartered Accountants Ireland Reporting and climate change The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is an EU Directive requiring certain companies to disclose information on sustainability-related impacts. It proposes significant changes to how entities report on their business’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) impacts. These changes will affect many enterprises – directly and indirectly.  Businesses ‘in scope’ of the CSRD are required to consider their supply chain when reporting on sustainability matters. This will mean that companies not in scope that form part of a supply chain may be asked to provide climate-related information by companies in scope. Small companies should prepare for this and have a mechanism to measure and disclose their carbon emissions. For more on the CSRD, see the Chartered Accountants Ireland Technical Hub. Dee Moran is Professional Accountancy Lead at Chartered Accountants Ireland  

Michael Diviney and Níall Fitzgerald explore the ethical challenges arising from artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ‘narrow’ AI, and highlight the importance of ethics and professional competence in its deployment Earlier this year, artificial intelligence (AI) industry leaders, leading researchers and influencers signed a succinct statement and warning: “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” Was this a publicity stunt? Well, probably not, as the generative AI ChatGPT was already the fastest-adopted application in history.  Was this an over-the-top, alarmist statement by a group possibly trying to steal a march on self-regulation of a rapidly emerging technology and growing industry?  Again, this is unlikely if one considers the warnings of pioneer thinkers like Nick Bostrom, Max Tegmark, Stephen Hawking and Astronomer Royal Martin Rees. They concur that there is an existential threat to humankind if human-level or ‘general’ AI is developed and the ‘singularity’ is reached when AI surpasses human intelligence.  Autonomous weapons and targeting are a clear risk, but more broadly, unless we can ensure that the goals of a future superintelligence are aligned and remain aligned with our goals, we may be considered superfluous and dispensable by that superintelligence.  As well as the extinction threat, general AI presents other potential ethical challenges.  For example, if AI attains subjective consciousness and is capable of suffering, does it then acquire rights? Do we have the right to interfere with these, including the right to attempt to switch it off and end its digital life?  Will AI become a legal entity and have property rights? After all, much of our economy is owned by companies, another form of artificial ‘person’. Ethical challenges from ‘narrow’ AI Until general AI is here, however – and there is informed scepticism about its possibility – the AI tools currently in use are weak or ‘narrow’ AI. They are designed to perform a specific task or a group of related tasks and rely on algorithms to process data on which they have been trained.  Narrow AI presents various ethical challenges:  Unfairness arising from bias and opacity (e.g. AI used in the initial screening of job candidates include a gender bias based on historical data – in the past more men were hired); The right to privacy (AI trained with data without the consent of the data subjects); Threats to physical safety (e.g. self-driving vehicles); Intellectual property and moral rights, plagiarism and passing-off issues in the use of generative AI like ChatGPT and Bard; and Threats to human dignity from the hollowing out of work and loss of purpose. Regulation vs. ethics Such issues arising from the use of AI, particularly related to personal data, mean that regulation is inevitable.  We can see this, for example, with the EU’s landmark AI Act, due to apply by the end of 2025, which aims to regulate AI’s potential to cause harm and to hold companies accountable for how their systems are used. However, as Professor Pat Barker explained at a recent Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (CCAB) webinar, until such laws are in place, and in the absence of clear rules, ethics are required for deciding on the right way to use AI.  Even when the regulation is in place, there are likely to be cases and dilemmas that it has not anticipated or about which it is unclear. Legal compliance should not be assumed to have all the ethical issues covered, and as AI is evolving so quickly, new ethical issues and choices will inevitably emerge.  Ethics involves the application of a decision-making framework to a dilemma or choice about the right thing to do. While such a framework or philosophy can reflect one’s values, it must also be objective, considered, universalisable and not just based on an instinctual response or what may be expedient. Established ethics frameworks include: the consequentialist or utilitarian approach – in the case of AI, does it maximise benefits for the greatest number of people?; and the deontological approach, which is based on first principles, such as the inalienable rights of the individual (an underlying philosophy of the EU’s AI Act). (The Institute’s Ethics Quick Reference Guide, found on the charteredaccountants.ie website, outlines five steps to prepare for ethical dilemmas and decision-making.)  A practical approach While such philosophical approaches are effective for questions like “Should we do this?” and “Is it good for society”, as Reid Blackman argues in Harvard Business Review, businesses and professionals may need a more practical approach, asking: “Given that we are going to [use AI], how can we do it without making ourselves vulnerable to ethical risks?”  Clear protocols, policies, due diligence and an emphasis on ethical risk management and mitigation are required, for example responsible AI clauses in agreements with suppliers. In this respect, accountants have an arguably competitive advantage in being members of a profession; they can access and apply an existing ethical framework, which is evolving and adapting as the technology, its opportunities and challenges change.  The Code of Ethics The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) recently revised the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (Code) to reflect the impact of technology, including AI, on the profession. The Chartered Accountants Ireland Code of Ethics will ultimately reflect these revisions.  IESBA has identified the two types of AI likely to have the most impact on the ethical behaviour of accountants:  Assisted intelligence or robotic process automation (RPA) in which machines carry out tasks previously done by humans, who continue to make decisions; and  Augmented intelligence, which involves collaboration between human and machine in decision-making. The revisions also include guidance on how accountants might address the risks presented by AI to ethical behaviour and decision-making in performing their role and responsibilities.  Professional competence and due care The Code requires an accountant to ensure they have an appropriate level of understanding relevant to their role and responsibilities and the work they undertake. The revisions acknowledge that the accountant’s role is evolving and that many of the activities they undertake can be impacted by AI.  The degree of competency required in relation to AI will be commensurate with the extent of an accountant’s use of and/or reliance on it. While programming AI may be beyond the competency of many accountants, they have the skill set to:  identify and articulate the problem the AI is being used to solve;  understand the type, source and integrity of the data required; and assess the utility and reasonableness of the output.  This makes accountants well placed to advise on aspects of the use of AI. The Code provides some examples of risks and considerations to be managed by professional accountants using AI, including: The data available might not be sufficient for the effective use of the AI tool. The accountant needs to consider the appropriateness of the source data (e.g. relevance, completeness and integrity) and other inputs, such as the decisions and assumptions being used as inputs by the AI. This includes identifying any underlying bias so that it can be addressed in final decision-making. The AI might not be appropriate for the purpose for which the organisation intends to use it. Is it the right tool for the job and designed for that particular purpose? Are users of the AI tool authorised and trained in its correct use within the organisation’s control framework? (One chief technology officer has suggested not only considering the capabilities of the AI tool but also its limitations to be better aware of the risks of something going wrong or where its use may not be appropriate.) The accountant may not have the ability, or have access to an expert with that ability, to understand and explain the AI and its appropriate use.  If the AI has been appropriately tested and evaluated for the purpose intended. The controls relating to the source data and the AI’s design, implementation and use, including user access. So, how does the accountant apply their skills and expertise in this context?  It is expected that accountants will use many of the established skills for which the profession is known to assess the input and interpret the output of an AI tool, including interpersonal, communication and organisational skills, but also technical knowledge relevant to the activity they are performing, whether it is an accounting, tax, auditing, compliance, strategic or operational business decision that is being made.  Data and confidentiality According to the Code, when an accountant receives or acquires confidential information, their duty of confidentiality begins. AI requires data, usually lots of it, with which it is trained. It also requires decisions by individuals in relation to how the AI should work (programming), when it should be used, how its use should be controlled, etc.  The use of confidential information with AI presents several confidentiality challenges for accountants. The Code includes several considerations for accountants in this regard, including: Obtaining authorisation from the source (e.g. clients or customers) for the use of confidential information, whether anonymised or otherwise, for purposes other than those for which it was provided. This includes whether the information can be used for training AI tools.  Considering controls to safeguard confidentiality, including anonymising data, encryption and access controls, and security policies to protect against data leaks.  Ensuring controls are in place for the coding and updating of the AI used in the organisation. Outdated code, bugs and irregular updates to the software can pose a security risk. Reviewing the security certification of the AI tool and ensuring it is up to date can offer some comfort.  Many data breaches result from human error, e.g. inputting confidential information into an open-access web-based application is a confidentiality breach if that information is saved, stored and later used by that application. Staff need to be trained in the correct use and purpose of AI applications and the safeguarding of confidential information. Dealing with complexity The Code acknowledges that technology, including AI, can help manage complexity.  AI tools can be particularly useful for performing complex analysis or financial modelling to inform decision-making or alerting the accountant to any developments or changes that require a re-assessment of a situation. In doing so, vast amounts of data are collected and used by AI, and the ability to check and verify the integrity of the data introduces another level of complexity.  The Code makes frequent reference to “relevancy” in relation to the analysis of information, scenarios, variables, relationships, etc., and highlights the importance of ensuring that data is relevant to the problem or issue being addressed. IESBA was mindful, when revising the Code, that there are various conceivable ways AI tools can be designed and developed to use and interpret data.  For example, objectivity can be challenged when faced with the complexity of divergent views supported by data, making it difficult to come to a decision. AI can present additional complexity for accountants, but the considerations set out in the Code are useful reminders of the essential skills necessary to manage complexity. Changing how we work As well as its hugely beneficial applications in, for example, healthcare and science, AI is proving to be transformative as a source of business value.  With a range of significant new tools launched daily, from personal effectiveness to analysis and process optimisation, AI is changing how we work. These are powerful tools, but with power comes responsibility. For the professional accountant, certain skills will be brought to the fore, including adaptability, change and risk management, and leadership amidst rapidly evolving work practices and business models. Accountants are well placed to provide these skills and support the responsible and ethical use of AI.  Rather than fearing being replaced by AI, accountants can prepare to meet expectations to provide added value and be at the helm of using AI tools for finance, management, strategic decision-making and other opportunities. Michael Diviney is Executive Head of Thought Leadership at Chartered Accountants Ireland Níall Fitzgerald is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Governments may opt for more quantitative easing to prevent global inflation from turning into a recession, writes Cormac Lucey Speaking about the Republic’s budgetary position in 1979, Charles Haughey famously declared that “as a community, we are living beyond our means”. But his remarks might just as well be applied today to Western world democracies.  An article in a June issue of The Economist proclaimed that “Fiscal policy in the rich world is mind-bogglingly reckless”. Global fiscal policy is unsuited to today’s economic circumstances. “High inflation and low unemployment mean the world needs tight policy, not loose,” it said.  Last month, the Department of Finance’s chief economist indicated that between 2019–2070, annual age-related expenditure is projected to increase from 21.4 to 31.5 percent of Irish national output. With a projected 2023 modified gross national income of €284 billion this year, that rise would cost €28.4 billion today. That’s over €10,000 annually for every person working, more than the budgetary damage done by the financial crash 15 years ago and roughly equal to one-third of total budgeted tax revenues this year.  The situation in the UK isn’t much better.  A report on “Fiscal Risks and Sustainability” from the Office for Budget Responsibility in July, projected an increase in primary spending between 2022–23 and 2072–73 of 8.6 percent of UK GDP. That’s equivalent to roughly £2.2 trillion in terms of today’s GDP, or around £6,000 annually per person working. Faced with inexorable spending pressures on one hand and political resistance to tax rises on the other, there is a structural risk that our political leaders will opt for greater borrowing as the way out.  The USA may be the forerunner in this regard.  It began running enormous budget deficits under President Trump even though the US economy was operating at near full capacity. It has continued this practice under President Biden. There has been no discernible political cost to be paid by either administration. And, as the issuer of the world’s largest reserve currency, it has seen precious little economic cost so far.  Fiscal dominance is shorthand for the fiscal needs of the central government dominating monetary policy set by central banks and occurs when central banks create fresh money (via quantitative easing) to prop up the prices of government debt securities and , thereby, contain the consequent interest rates.  Between 2009–2021, the share of their government’s issued debt held by central banks grew by about 15 percent in the USA and around 30 percent in the UK and the Eurozone. In essence, central banks were able to do something inflationary (create a lot of fresh money) because external circumstances were already very deflationary.  A justification can always be found: economies must be sustained through the financial crisis; we must not let a pandemic morph into a depression. The political cost was negligible. We can, therefore, expect more of the same in the future when fiscal push comes to monetary shove.  The constraint on fiscal dominance will not be rules or laws governing what is right or wrong but expedience: what can policymakers get away with?  The practical constraints will be financial market reactions and any inflationary effects of monetary loosening. But there may not be any noticeable market reaction: the Bank of Japan owns an estimated 45 percent of all Japanese government debt without any allergic market reaction.  The key question is whether inflationary pressures are stoked by aggressive fiscal dominance. The return of inflation explains why monetary restriction has replaced monetary exuberance.  But once inflation is out of the way, expect fiscal dominance (and more money-printing) to resume. That would be bullish for real assets (such as property and commodities) and bearish for paper assets.   Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Accountancy Ireland sits down with Carol Phelan, CFO of Dalata Hotel Group. From her journey at one of the Big Four to private equity, Phelan shares her insights into the business side of the hospitality industry and Dalata’s people-centric approach to success A lifelong interest in business took Carol Phelan on a career path that has seen her work in a Big Four firm, an Irish private equity house and, ultimately, become CFO of Dalata Hotel Group – Ireland’s largest hotel operator. Speaking to Accountancy Ireland  in Dalata’s new state-of-the-art headquarters in Sandyford in south Dublin, Phelan explains how she grew up on a farm in County Laois and was always interested in business.   “At school, I gravitated towards business success stories, particularly Irish ones. I was always strong with numbers – they made sense to me, but it wasn’t just about balancing the books. It’s what people are doing with the business. I did a broad Business degree at the University of Limerick. I specialised in accounting and finance and did a Master’s in Accounting. I knew it was a qualification that would stand to me whatever I did.” Her undergraduate degree included an internship component, and in a forerunner of her future career, it took her to work in a hotel in France for nine months. “I got to work with numbers in a real business and found I could bring some skill to that.” After college, she joined KPMG and qualified as a Chartered Accountant.  “I wanted to develop my skills and build my professional and business network,” she says. “I worked in the financial services and transaction services divisions. That allowed me to work with companies doing deals and making strategic acquisitions. I was able to go into businesses of different sizes in various sectors and work with leading advisors. I enjoyed my time with KPMG.” She also learned something about herself. “I realised I didn’t want to be an advisor. I wanted to be the one making the decisions and living with them.” Moving on from the Big Four Phelan joined private equity house Ion Equity in 2007, just before the global financial crash hit. It could hardly have been a more challenging time for that sector.  “It took me out of my comfort zone,” she says with no little understatement. “It was about going in, putting deals together, and putting money behind them. It was also about helping finance teams in investee companies deal with the challenges presented by the crash.” Given her qualifications and experience, she was often asked why she didn’t go to one of the major international private equity firms. “I wanted to be where the leadership was,” she explains. “I wanted to be close to the decisions. No matter how small a role I had, I wanted to be part of the decision making.” Her next move saw her join Dalata in 2014.  “I wanted to get into the finance function of a large Irish company,” Phelan explains. “The Dalata opportunity came up, and it ticked all the boxes. The people leading the company shared my values – ambition, a desire to grow and challenge oneself, and always wanting to do better. Dalata has that in spades.  “The company has always been led by people very concerned about building a business that works for everyone and not just about generating higher numbers and profits. They want a business that creates opportunities for everybody. I knew the people in Dalata before I joined, so I knew it was all true.” The company was on the cusp of significant change when she joined. “It was just after the IPO. All the structures had to be built to accommodate it. I was able to use my skills for that. It was great to have that challenge.” A people-centric business The culture of the business is very important to Phelan.  “Hospitality is a very people-centric business. It’s about more than numbers and the bottom line. That sits well with me and my background. Dalata has always said it wants people with ambition: ambition to grow and develop themselves but to bring others with them, as well.” Dalata places great store by training and development, with over 113,00 training courses completed by its staff in 2022.  “The company is growing and ambitious. I can’t tell you the opportunities that will exist in three years, but we will put everything behind people who want to grow and develop.  “People who joined the company in 2015 are now working in roles that didn’t exist back then. We give people support to get the experience and skills and take on those roles. We opened seven hotels in 2022, and the majority of the leadership teams in them is made up of people developed in Dalata. That creates opportunities for those following behind them.”  Career mobility is also important. “You can join the finance team here, but who knows where you will end up. We have operations people who ended up in finance and operations people who started in finance. You can’t pigeonhole people. As a major plc, we also have all the finance strands here so someone can build a full suite of experience.” There is a need to look beyond functional skills, she adds. “You can develop skills for a role in finance, but it has never been just about the numbers. I can tell by sitting across the table from someone if targets will be met without looking at numbers on a page. We all have that ability if we work on it.” The people-centric approach delivers real business benefits. “We see ourselves as an employer of choice. That’s very important in the hospitality industry. We are not as challenged as others in the industry regarding recruitment. We are now back at 2019 job vacancy rates. We will always have several vacancies. That’s the nature of the business.” “The only way was up” She was appointed Group CFO on 1 July 2021. “The only way was up, having been shut down for most of the previous two years [during the pandemic],” she says with a smile. “It was easy coming in after that. Anyone can look like a hero in those circumstances.” Looking back on COVID-19, she believes it showed Dalata at its best.  “We never panicked. We stood back and said it would resolve itself. That was based on a genuine belief that science would get there. That was our underlying expectation, and we had to be ready when we came out the other side. We looked at it through a longer lens. Everyone stepped in to do whatever needed to be done. Our bottom line was to protect our people. They represent our biggest asset. The accounting standards haven’t figured out a way to measure the strategic value of people yet, but we know what it is.” The aim was to keep people employed during COVID-19.  “Our focus was on everyone doing the right things in the right ways to keep people on. That’s the Dalata way of doing things. We ensured all our people had full access to the Dalata Online Academy. Even at home, they could continue to grow and develop.” The operations software platform also proved its worth. “We use it in the hotels for people management, rostering, onboarding, as a communications tool, and for pushing out video updates,” Phelan explains. “We have a lot of young people in the industry, and the ability to access information over the phone is so important to them, particularly when they can’t get together physically. We ensured people remained connected to the business even when apart.” That approach was extended to customers, landlords, suppliers, bankers and other stakeholders.  “We gave refunds to customers when they asked for them. We never even considered not paying rent. All our decisions were taken with a view to the long term. That will stand to us in the future.” Growth Having delivered record profits in 2022, there will be no let-up in the growth and development of Dalata Hotel Group, Phelan says.  “We now have 52 hotels in Ireland, the UK and continental Europe, and another five in the pipeline in London, Brighton, Manchester and Dublin. Forty percent of our rooms are in Dublin, 40 percent in the UK, and the balance is in regional Ireland and continental Europe.  “We have great ambitions for continental Europe, but our priority growth focus is the UK. There is a gap in the four-star hotel market, and we are in a great position to fill it. Dalata is a very ambitious company. The focus is always on what’s next. I love that attitude. But there is strong discipline. There will never be trophy assets in Dalata. Everything must make sense for the broader business and deliver a return for our shareholders.”  She concludes by pointing out that her own role reflects the core values of Dalata.  “I am an executive director and sit on the board as well as leading the finance team. I must be able to contribute to Dalata strategically, not just in my own expert area. Board members need to be able to challenge each other. We may approach it from slightly different angles, but it’s important to hear everyone’s views. That’s the Dalata culture overall. People are encouraged to bring their individuality to work. Everyone is encouraged to have a voice and to speak up. Who we are and where we’ve come from shapes that. We all bring different perspectives to the debate.”

Start-ups looking to grow have a range of options but carefully considering accounting standards is one way to reduce complexity, write Wuraola Raheem and Paddy McGhee For many Irish high-growth start-ups, the early years are consumed by the cash burn of developing a new product, followed by the cost of growing the market. The nuances of accounting standards are often a secondary consideration.  However, not being aware of some of the accounting standards considerations can have a negative impact on investor confidence and regulatory compliance. Here are nine areas of complexity that often arise for high-growth companies at the start of their journey. IFRS or FRS 102? If an organisation has an international shareholder base and international customers and suppliers, should it use IFRS?  While IFRS is a complete standard recognised globally, its measurement and valuation criteria, together with its disclosure requirements, are burdensome for a small company.  FRS 102 was written with small companies in mind, and in most cases, for a growing company, it will work as well as IFRS.  The decision to move to IFRS will be better taken when the company matures. For example, if a firm acquires other businesses along the way, the requirements for assessing the purchase price allocation are more onerous under IFRS than FRS 102.  Similarly, disclosure requirements are more onerous under IFRS. Revenue recognition There are very few modern businesses for which revenue recognition arises when the invoice is issued. Many companies provide multiple services and warranties, give a right of return or provide a service over a period of time or – increasingly in the tech sector – based on consumption.  This will give rise to the possibility of accrued revenue in which the service is provided in advance of billing or deferred revenue if billing has occurred, but the service or good has not been fully delivered. IFRS, US GAAP and FRS 102 are mainly consistent in their treatment of when revenue is recognised. Many growing companies enter into tailored contracts in order to make those first few sales often giving rise to additional free services or warranties that may lead to revenue deferrals.  Many other firms enter into agreements with large platform companies to sell their products or services, and the lines between marketing and delivery costs and net revenue can become blurred. Accounting for venture capital As companies begin to raise equity, the type of financing used is often not ordinary shares. Common forms of investing include: convertible loan notes; preferential loan notes; preference shares; and shares with a liquidation preference. Today, few investments are in the form of a loan or equity as investors look to protect their investment by having some form of preference. There is often a level of negotiation in these, so funding instruments will almost always have some individual nuances. The impact is that some convertible instruments include a hybrid instrument that needs to be assessed or, in other instances, while something may be called a ‘share’, if it has a fixed return, it may be accounted for as debt. Many companies also overlook the fact that the direct costs of raising equity are recognised in equity, or direct costs relating to debt are capitalised and amortised using an effective interest rate method. It’s not to say that many costs leading up to a finance raise are expensed, such as due diligence fees. Share-based payments There has been much valid criticism in Ireland that share-based remuneration has not received more tax concessions. For a young company, a popular route to attract staff is to offer share options, reducing the cash outlay.  In theory, share options are provided in lieu of a cash salary. Because of this, accounting standards require the intrinsic value of share options at the date they are issued to be recognised as an expense over the service period. Depending on the perceived volatility of the shares and the rights attached to them, this can result in a sizeable non-cash charge to the income statement and one that often does not appear in management accounts. Investing in cloud infrastructure The treatment of expenditure linking a business to cloud-based software has recently been a hot topic for large companies.  The reason for this is that IFRS accounting standard setters recently reminded companies that where they invest in linkages to a cloud-based infrastructure, the related costs should be expensed rather than capitalised on the basis that the firms do not own or control the cloud-based software. This meant that several multi-million Euro enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation projects were expensed rather than capitalised.  It is easy to see the frustration that some reporters faced as they will receive the benefit of those costs over several years. With many companies reliant on cloud-based infrastructure, it can be a shock to learn that not all the related costs meet the criteria for capitalisation. Capitalised development expenditure “Our enterprise value is €XX million so how come we cannot recognise that value on our balance sheet?” is a common question, followed by: “Given we have spent €XX million on product development, can we capitalise that?” Accounting standards are very detailed on what can be capitalised and what is expensed. Generally, costs relating to internally generated brands, start-up costs, training activities, research, advertising and internally generated goodwill are expensed. The one area in which companies may capitalise costs is where such costs relate to the development of a product or process that can be shown to bring future economic benefit.  There are, however, concise rules on what may be capitalised. While costs can be, it does not mean such costs meet the criteria for claiming research and development (R&D) tax credits.  While the costs can be closely aligned, they are not mutually inclusive. International expansion Given the size of Ireland’s indigenous market, most companies look to international expansion early on. Initially, companies need to assess how they will expand: Do they use foreign subsidiaries to make sales? Is a foreign subsidiary used for providing services to the parent company in sales and marketing, local maintenance or R&D? Regardless of the role played by the foreign subsidiary, from a tax perspective, the share of the taxable profit each country will get will need to be determined. This is where the concept of transfer pricing comes in, and companies need to determine where the profit would reside if the various companies were unrelated. Increasingly with foreign expansion, companies have to deal with employee taxes for foreign employees or employees who move to a new market to help set up a presence. Consolidation requirement As companies grow, they reach a stage where there is a requirement to prepare consolidated statutory financial statements. At a basic level, if a company is defined as a small company under Irish law, it is not required to prepare consolidated accounts. The requirement for consolidated accounts kicks in when a company exceeds two of the following criteria two years in a row: Third-party turnover of €20 million; Gross assets of €10 million; and/or 250 employees. Given the relatively high-level criteria for employee numbers, companies generally meet the requirement when they reach the turnover limit. Other regulatory requirements Irish company law and accounting requirements are generally well legislated for, ensuring that small companies are not overly regulated.  Having reached the consolidation requirement at €20 million turnover, a private company’s next legislative bar is the requirement to have a directors’ compliance statement if it reaches €25 million turnover. Having reached a consolidated turnover of €50 million, a company is required to put an audit committee in place or explain why one is not required. Wuraola Raheem is Audit Manager in Consumer Technology Business at Deloitte Paddy McGhee is Audit Manager in Consumer Technology Business at Deloitte

Chartered Accountant David Malone, Chief Executive of the Irish League of Credit Unions, believes that credit unions are uniquely positioned to fill the gaps left by the departure of major banks and cater to the needs of small businesses and individuals, offering a personalised and community-focused approach Having recently achieved the top ranking in the Ireland RepTrak 2023 study of corporate reputation, credit unions are now poised to provide a real alternative to traditional retail banks for the full range of financial services products.  The credit union sector’s strong local presence with over 500 locations across the island of Ireland demonstrates a clear community focus now combined with soon-to-be-enacted new legislation, which will see credit unions unlock their full potential to become the country’s primary financial services institution of choice. David Malone, Chief Executive of the Irish League of Credit Unions (ILCU), an advocacy body for credit unions in Ireland, believes the unique ethos and DNA of credit unions place them in a strong position to fill the void left by the departure of KBC and Ulster Bank, as well as other service gaps. “There have been significant changes in the financial services sector since the global financial crisis,” he says. “Twelve retail banks were operating in Ireland back then. It’s down to three now. That has led to a lack of customer choice, particularly in the mortgage and SME lending markets, where competition is highly concentrated between the three pillar banks.  “Along with that, we have seen bank branch closures, decimating Irish towns and even where branches remain, decision-making has migrated from the local branch to the centre.” That centralisation has created problems for customers, says Malone.  “For example, small businesses have a real challenge trying to get loans from banks,” he notes. “There is limited interaction with local bank branch managers. Many such loans are turned down. A small business owner can visit their local credit union and sit with staff to explain their business and its needs. Our staff have that vital local knowledge and will understand the specific needs of the business that, in many cases, can help in providing the appropriate loan finance.”  Building relationships Malone joined the ILCU as Head of Finance and Deputy CEO seven years ago, after spending over ten years in audit and assurance with PwC.  “I trained as a Chartered Accountant with PwC after doing my degree in Accounting and Finance and Masters in Accounting at DCU,” he says. “I am now a Fellow of the Institute. It’s a great qualification, providing a real platform for your career. “At PwC, I worked with a wide range of clients, from large Irish plcs to SMEs to Irish subsidiaries of multinationals. Going into different businesses and seeing how they are run was fascinating.” Auditing is much more than a numbers game, he explains. “You have to build relationships with audit clients. You are there to add value and recommend improvements to the client’s financial processes.” He was drawn to the business world as a student during his summer job. “I worked for five summers in my aunt’s business, which was a busy tour operator during the 90s. I learned all about customer service and how the true value of timely and reliable financial information is key to decision-making and strategic direction.” Malone was appointed ILCU CEO in July 2022.  “In conjunction with our board, I had been leading the transformation programme for the organisation prior to that,” he says. “The programme aims to deliver on our new purpose to lead, support and sustain the development of credit unions on the island of Ireland. “Our areas of focus include facilitating collaboration of credit unions, repositioning the credit union brand, and effective advocacy to government and regulators. We also provide a significant suite of professional services to member credit unions in areas such as risk and compliance, legal, human resources and training.” The evolution of credit unions “Our transformation has brought significant additional expertise into the organisation with a number of new skill sets adding huge value as we deliver our purpose,” Malone notes. Malone is excited by the evolution of credit unions. “Credit unions have a 42 percent share of the personal lending market. They have issued close to half a million loans in the last year. In addition, credit unions in over 200 locations across the country are now providing current accounts that are potentially accessible by over two million credit union members. These can be accessed through an app and support Apple Pay and Google Pay. Credit unions now account for over 10 percent of new current accounts opened.” The new legislation, the Credit Union Amendment Bill, is a game changer, Malone says. It allows for the establishment of Credit Union Service Organisations (CUSOs) by groups of credit unions. These CUSOs enable credit unions to pool resources to invest in back-office infrastructure that will enable more credit unions to provide a wider range of financial services, particularly SME lending and mortgages. The new legislation also allow credit unions to provide services to members of other credit unions where the credit unions agree and allows credit unions to pool loans and risk between each other. “Credit unions have significant funds to lend,” says Malone. “They are not relying on the wholesale money markets for their funding. Instead, members continue showing confidence and trust in credit unions by depositing their savings.  “A number of credit unions now offer some of the lowest interest rates in the mortgage market. Credit union mortgage lending has increased by 25 percent in the last year. There is circa €11 billion of funds in credit unions that is available to be lent and can be used to fund small businesses, help people buy their homes, and support community organisations. The new legislation will help credit unions significantly increase their footprint in these areas. “Digitalisation presents great opportunities,” he explains. “Credit unions embrace technology by providing online payments, digital membership and loan applications. However, there is an important difference: credit unions are not digital only; they are digital with the essential human touch. Credit unions are omnichannel, so you can go into a branch or call on the phone and get an answer in real-time.” There is also the issue of financial exclusion. “People still need access to cash, and with banks closing branches and removing ATMs around the country, credit unions have an important role to play in providing that access.” Trusted organisations Malone believes that personal service is the chief reason for credit unions’ top ranking in the Ireland RepTrak 2023 study of corporate reputation.  “We got under the bonnet of that ranking, and we found the key contributors are our human, friendly and authentic service. The study emphasises attributes such as trust and respect, which are core to the ethos of credit unions which are locally owned and managed. We are proud to be at the heart of communities nationwide working towards a more inclusive society, where no one is left behind.” That contrasts sharply with some of the other lenders in the market. Malone is concerned about the impact of ‘buy now pay later’ (BNPL) and personal contract purchase (PCP) products on borrowers. “People don’t realise they are accumulating significant amounts of small debts with these products,” he says. “When people get a loan from the credit union, it’s very transparent and open. We want a lifetime relationship with members. It’s not short-term. Credit unions have helped members consolidate debts to deal with issues created by those products.” He explains that credit union loans are very different to other loans.  “For example, credit union loans provide flexibility, including no early repayment penalties. There is also loan protection insurance that effectively repays the loan in the event of a member’s death. This is a unique credit union benefit that you won’t get with the bank.  “I recently learned about a young person in their twenties whose parents had died. The parents had bank and credit union loans. The credit union loans were paid off automatically as they were covered by the insurance. The bank offered a repayment plan. Our approach is so different to other credit providers. We genuinely care about our members.” That membership is ultimately the critical point of difference, he believes.  “Our members are much more than customers; they are part owners of their credit union. They have a say in how it’s run. Members can volunteer to be on the board and committees. The boards are made up of community volunteers who have the locality’s best interests at heart. They selflessly give their time to credit unions. I would encourage any Chartered Accountant to consider becoming a credit union director, as it is enormously rewarding. “We see credit unions becoming primary financial institutions of choice migrating from the periphery to the front and centre of the financial services landscape,” he continues. “We are building on over sixty years of service to communities around Ireland. We are here to stay, not retrenching or closing – quite the opposite. We are growing and moving forward. We are building on a great reputation and great customer experience. We are offering a much wider range of products and services across the country, and that’s great news for members and the people of Ireland.”

The Pre-Budget Submission 2024 tackles challenges in Ireland, from the ‘green’ transition to inflation and housing supply, offering recommendations to benefit businesses, says Gearóid O’Sullivan Each year, Pre-Budget Submission is prepared under the auspices of the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies – Ireland (CCAB-I).  It is a particularly influential document as it represents not only the views of Chartered Accountants but also our peers in other professional accountancy organisations. The Pre-Budget Submission is overseen by the CCAB-I’s Tax Committee South, of which the membership is predominantly Chartered Accountants. Pre-Budget Submission 2024 This year’s Pre-Budget Submission addresses several key issues impacting business in Ireland, from the so-called ‘green’ transition to the impact of inflationary pressures and, of course, ongoing supply issues on all sides of the residential property market.  The aim of any tax measure is ultimately to support the economy and wider society. Therefore, to the extent a measure represents an initial cost to the Exchequer, the hope and intention is that there is a corresponding benefit that exceeds the cost.  In some instances, the benefit is purely financial, e.g. our recommendation to permanently legislate for the Special Assignee Relief Program (SARP) and, in others, the benefit is a desired change in behaviour, e.g. our recommendation to introduce a ‘Help-to-Insulate’ scheme. Measures to alleviate capacity issues in the residential property market The residential property market faces issues on both the rental and retail sides.  On the rental side, we continue to advocate for measures to make renting more attractive, particularly for small-scale and accidental landlords.  Despite tax legislation recognising taxable profits in many cases, often small-scale and accidental landlords find themselves in a cash-flow negative position when the tax bill and any loans on the property are taken into account.  While it is reasonable to mention the economic benefit achieved through property ownership over the longer term, the cash-flow impact is often driving these small-scale and accidental landlords out of the rental market.  If this cohort of landlords were, in turn, selling their investment properties, there could be a sound basis from a policy perspective in maintaining the rules in their current iteration.  However, landlords will often have to first seek to evict and then sell. As such, vacancy represents a key policy issue for government when designing appropriate taxation rules for landlords. With the above in mind, CCAB-I has made several recommendations that we suggest will make letting sufficiently attractive for smaller-scale and accidental landlords: Local property tax should be available as a deduction against rental income. Expenses deductible under section 97 TCA 1997 should be aligned with Case I/II principles. Expenses that are revenue in nature and incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the rental business should be deductible, and rental losses should be available for offset against other income. Capital allowance rates for fixtures and fittings should be increased from 12.5 percent to 25 percent per annum to facilitate landlords investing in the maintenance of properties, providing the works do not result in the termination of an existing tenancy. Landlords who retrofit a property to enhance the property’s energy rating should be able to claim a 100 percent capital allowance where the renovations do not result in the termination of an existing tenancy. The Government should introduce measures to bring parity to the taxation of corporate and individual professional landlords by introducing a flat rate of 25 percent on Case V income for small landlords who opted to become ‘professional landlords’ by waiving their rights under Section 34 of the Residential Tenancy Act (2014), giving additional security to their tenants. We have also suggested a reasonable capital gains tax (CGT) relief to incentivise property sales with tenants in-situ: Professional landlords should be given access to succession reliefs (e.g. CGT retirement relief) to improve the long-term investment proposition of the residential rental business. To encourage landlords to remain in the private rental market, CGT relief of four percent per annum should accrue for the length of time the asset remains a rental property. (This was specifically examined in a 2017 Report of the Working Group on the Tax and Fiscal Treatment of Rental Accommodation Providers.) In addition to the above, we are also recommending that Government increases ‘Rent-a-Room’ relief to match standardised average rents and to remove the ‘cliff-edge’ over which relief is completely removed. Measures to combat inflationary pressures The level of inflation in the Irish economy is putting significant pressure on households.  The European Central Bank began increasing interest rates in a bid to dampen inflation. There is a balance to be struck between tax measures to combat inflation and the policy aim of reducing spending capacity. With that said, there is scope for a reasonable change in the personal tax regime, which should not be incongruent with the policy objectives of the European Central Bank.  Earlier this year, CCAB-I responded to the Department of Finance’s consultation on Ireland’s personal tax system. The Pre-Budget Submission includes many of the points raised in that earlier submission, including a recommendation to move to indexation of the income tax bands and credits.  In Ireland, a taxpayer begins to pay tax at the higher rate from €40,000, although the average industrial wage is €46,800. Therefore, the application of an indexed approach to increasing bands and credits should ensure that tax bands and credits remain valuable year to year. Otherwise, while the Government may not raise bands and credits in a particular year, the real value of after-tax wage is likely to have decreased due to the impact of inflation. We also recommend changes to other areas of the personal tax system, including several changes to the CGT and capital acquisition tax (CAT) regimes. These include: The CGT annual exempt amount available under section 601 TCA 1997 should be increased to €5,000.  The CGT indexation tables in section 556 TCA 1997 should be extended beyond 2003 to the present day. The rates of CGT and CAT should be reduced to 20 percent. The lifetime limit for claiming revised entrepreneur relief under section 597AA TCA 1997 should be increased to €5 million. The category A threshold for CAT should be increased to €350,000 in line with a rate reduction. The CAT small gift exemption should be increased to €5,000. Employers’ PRSI should not be increased at this time. As in 2022, we are also recommending that further consideration is given to an intermediate rate of income tax. This is a longer-term ambition.  However, the current system is complicated by the fact that we have three separate taxes on personal income (income tax, USC and PRSI). As such, all these taxes could be redesigned into a single tax, and in this scenario, an intermediate rate of tax becomes a key tool. Further recommendations Pre-Budget Submission includes further recommendations on measures to assist climate change, support foreign direct investment, SMEs and entrepreneurs, and enhance the tax system generally.  The document is a key feature of the tax department’s annual output. It reflects the views of professional accountants across the country and is presented directly to the Department of Finance each year.  While the Government faces several challenges in this year’s Budget as it balances a substantial surplus with increasing societal needs, it is hoped that our recommendations will be considered in terms of the benefit we believe they will bring to businesses in Ireland. Gearóid O’Sullivan is a Tax Manager at Chartered Accountants Ireland 

Imelda Hurley, CEO at Coillte, the semi-state forestry company, talks about her passion for sustainability and the importance of Ireland’s climate action and biodiversity agenda for the Irish economy and society  Imelda Hurley knew from an early age that she was destined for a career in business. Hurley tells Accountancy Ireland about her career path and how Coillte’s strategic vision will further support its contribution to Ireland’s climate targets, optimising the multiple benefits from forestry.  Tell us about yourself and the start of your career. I grew up on a family dairy farm just outside Clonakilty in West Cork. My first job was with Clonakilty Black Pudding, a little-known brand back then, but now a very successful and entrepreneurial operation. I completed a Business Studies degree at the University of Limerick. Following that I joined Arthur Andersen and became a Chartered Accountant. During that time, I had the opportunity to engage with multinationals and indigenous companies. That gave me a great lens into how organisations successfully operate, develop and implement strategy. How has your career evolved since you qualified as a Chartered Accountant? A: I always had an ambition to become a CFO and eventually a CEO. My career experience has been from farm to fork to forestry, working in the food, agribusiness and agriservices businesses across a variety of ownership structures.  During my role as CFO and Head of Corporate Sustainability at PCH International in China, I had the opportunity to learn more about sustainable product development and supply chain management.  That was over 10 years ago, when few organisations were talking about sustainability. I’m left reflecting on how times have changed over those 10 years and how there is an increased focus on sustainability today.  You were appointed as CEO of Coillte in November 2019. Tell us about your role and what attracted you to the position. I really enjoy the outdoors and nature. Coillte gave me a great opportunity to work in a business with a commercial focus, but also a business delivering social good. I joined Coillte in November 2019 and I spent much of the first two years navigating the pandemic. I wanted to ensure that Coillte emerged from the pandemic as a sustainable, viable and vibrant organisation. I am pleased to say that when we reported our 2021 results, we delivered record revenues, record profitability and a record dividend to the State.  Coillte manages 440,000 hectares of primarily forested land, circa seven percent of Ireland’s land, with about 6,000 individual properties. We have just over 800 employees and 1,200 contractors working across three divisions: Coillte Forest, Land Solutions and Medite Smartply.  Coillte is the nation’s largest forester and producer of certified wood, a natural, renewable and sustainable resource and the largest provider of outdoor recreation space in Ireland. It enables wind-energy on the estate, processes forestry by-products and undertakes nature rehabilitation projects of scale. When you were presented with your Businessperson of the Year Award in December, you were described as an “advocate for sustainable business practices and a leader in sustainability discussions”. Why is sustainability important to you? We are on a journey that requires us to leave the planet in a better place than we found it. There is a financial balance sheet but also an environmental and social balance sheet. Good business brings these together. From my perspective, I accepted the award on behalf of Team Coillte, all of whom work every day to balance and deliver the multiple benefits of forestry.  Tell us about the strategic vision you launched last year and Coillte’s plans for the next 12 months and beyond. In April 2022, we launched a new forest strategic vision focusing on four pillars – Forests for Climate, Wood, Nature and People. This vision sees us, as an example, enabling the creation of 100,000 hectares of new forests by 2050. Those forests will sink approximately 18 million tonnes of CO2.  We are also working on how we manage our existing forests to capture an additional 10 million tonnes of CO2 by 2050.  We have an ambition to redesign approximately 30,000 hectares of peatland forests through a programme of rewetting or rewilding for climate and ecological benefits and also aiming to enable the generation of one gigawatt of renewable wind energy by 2030.  From a people and recreational perspective, we are targeting to enable €100 million of investment to create world-class visitor destinations by 2030.  In July 2022, we launched Beyond The Trees, Avondale at Avondale Forest Park in County Wicklow and in June of this year, we opened the newly refurbished Avondale House, further adding to Avondale Forest Park experience, which has had over 300,000 visitors since June 2022. Our ongoing focus is to continue to ensure a strong, viable, vibrant Coillte that focuses on optimising our contribution to Ireland’s Climate Action plan, while continuing to deliver sustainably certified timber to support the decarbonisation of the built environment.  Our strategic vision also involves increasing from 20 percent of the estate being primarily managed for nature and biodiversity to 30 percent by 2025 and to 50 percent in the long-term. Another major focus for us is workforce capacity, planning for our organisation and the industry more broadly. We have 440,000 hectares under management and between now and 2050 the State has an ambition to increase forest cover from 11.6 percent to 18 percent. As such there will be a requirement to attract more people into our sector going forward. Are you glad you made the decision to qualify as a Chartered Accountant and what career advice would you offer your younger self? A: In the early years of my career, I looked up to others. Ultimately, I realised what was much more important was to follow my own path and enjoy the journey. You have to do what makes you happy and if you work hard and are determined, good things will come.  

The European Commission (EC) has adopted the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) on 31 July 2023. This marks a significant milestone in the development of European Sustainability Reporting Standards and is the culmination of great effort from the various parties tasked with its development- including the EFRAG Sustainability Reporting Board, the EFRAG Sustainability Technical Expert Group, its initial Project Task Force and respondents to the recent consultations on the ESRS. The EC has also published a press announcement and Q&As and have indicated that additional implementation guidance will be prepared and made available over the coming months. The standard will enter into force following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and the first wave of entities will report under the ESRS for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2024. The reporting requirements will then be phased-in over the subsequent years to various company types and sizes. If you wish to find out more about the ESRS, please see our recent free webinar "Further your knowledge about the European Sustainability Reporting Standards"

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has announced that it has concluded its decision making on two projects and will begin drafting and balloting two new IFRS Accounting Standards. The IASB expect to issue the new standards in the first half of 2024. The first of these standards will be the result of the Primary Financial Statements project and will supersede IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. This standard will result in companies reporting more consistently and transparently on their financial performance, making it easier for investors to compare companies. The second standard is the result of the Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosure project and will reduce the disclosure requirements for subsidiaries that are not traded on a public market, or who do not hold assets entrusted to them by their customers. The IASB have decided that the effective date for the two new standards will be periods commencing on or after 1 January 2027, with early adoption permitted.