Company law news

Introduction The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act  (ECCTA) which was passed in 2023 continues to bring legal change in the UK. ECCTA introduced identity verification requirements so that UK Companies House will know the identity of anyone setting up, running ,owning or controlling a company in the UK. As part of those changes, ECCTA also introduced the ACSP regime into UK law . A few  strands of the regime, including registration as an ACSP and performing verification and filing are considered in this article. We also consider some challenges which have arisen for our member firms in cases where they are not eligible to register as an ACSP, and we explore further if there are any solutions member firms can adopt. ACSPs :Verification and filing Since 18th November 2025 company directors and people with significant control (PSCs) are legally required to verify their identity under ECCTA. A 12-month transition period is now in place for existing directors and PSCs to comply with the new identity verification requirements by November 2026. The date during the transition period by which directors/PSCs must verify will depend on various factors. This includes whether they are a new director, in which case  they must comply before their registration or appointment as a new director. Existing directors or PSCs must comply based on the company confirmation statement due date during the transition period (and compliance by November 2026 is required). Failure to comply with identity verification requirements on time is an offence. Directors and PSCs can (1) verify themselves directly with Companies House or (2) verify by using an ACSP. Firms which are eligible to register with Companies House as an ACSP (see further below) have been able to register as ACSPs since 18 March 2025. If an accountancy firm  wants to verify its client company directors or PSCs then it must be registered now as an ACSP . Currently there is no change to filing procedures for Companies House and firms can continue to file documents with Companies House in the usual way for their clients without being registered as an ACSP. This will change later in 2026 . In January 2026, Companies House indicated that from no earlier than November 2026, firms will need to be registered as an ACSP to be able to file on behalf of clients. What firms can register with Companies House as an ACSP To become an ACSP, a firm must be supervised within the UK under the UK's Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (the Regulations) by a relevant Anti-Money Laundering (AML) supervisory body. See further details in the following paragraph. What if you cannot register with Companies House as an ACSP The roll out of identity verification and the ACSP regime has given rise to an issue for some Chartered Accountants Ireland member firms which are not AML supervised in the UK . Schedule 1 of the Regulations lists Chartered Accountants Ireland as an AML supervisory authority in the UK in relation to certain "relevant persons", namely relevant persons who are members of the Institute or who are regulated or supervised by it (Regulation 7). The Regulations apply to relevant persons acting in the course of business carried on by them in the United Kingdom. For the purposes of the Regulations a relevant person is to be regarded as carrying on business in the UK where their registered office is in the UK and the day-to-day management of the carrying on of the business is the responsibility of that office, or another establishment in the UK (Regulation 9). Republic of Ireland registered firms may have clients for whom they need to file with Companies House, but if the member firm is supervised for AML purposes in Ireland, not the UK under the Regulations then it is not eligible to register as an ACSP under the legislation as it stands.  In July 2025, the Institute made a representation to the UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade about this issue and for a change in the law to allow Irish AML supervised firms to apply to register as ACSPs. The issue has not yet been resolved to date , and the Institute continues to advocate for this change. If a member firm cannot register because it is not UK AML supervised (firms can check their status with the Institute ) then it might consider putting an arrangement in place with a third party registered  ACSP to carry out verification or filing work on behalf of its clients. If this option is used by member firms, it is considered outsourcing and appropriate outsourcing controls should be implemented by member firms including (1) performance of due diligence regarding the third party registered ACSP prior to appointment, (2) establishment of an outsourcing agreement with the third party ACSP including arrangements regarding information sharing requirements (3) post appointment, the member firm should perform on-going oversight of verification and/or filing activities performed by the third party ACSP on its behalf. The Institute does not endorse or recommend third party ACSPs and we urge members who are considering this route to give careful consideration to the guidance issued by Companies House on the list of ACSPs which it maintains . Members should study the article in full. Please note some of the highlights: the list is not a complete list of all registered ACSPs , it is not updated on a set schedule by Companies House so it may be incomplete or out of date. In addition , before a member  uses a third party ACSP they should always check that the ACSP is not on the list of ceased or suspended ACSPs. The work involved in verification to Companies House by an ACSP  An eligible firm may be considering expanding its offering by registering as an ACSP and taking on new business of verifying directors/PSCs for companies . Before undertaking this work, firms should satisfy themselves as to what is involved. For an ACSP to verify a client , Companies House requires ACSPs to have completed identity checks that meet the Companies House identity verification standard. It is important to note that these are different to customer due diligence checks to prevent money laundering. You can click to read guidance on how to meet Companies House identity verification standard. This includes asking for information about the person, getting  evidence to verify the person’s identity and the documents which can be used as evidence. It also covers the checking of identity documents either electronically by identification document validation technology (IDVT) or checking by a person . If this checking is by a person they must be trained in detecting false documents and be familiar with the guidance on examining identity documents to detect basic forgeries. The requirements to verify documents ,laid out in the guidance, is a significant step up from what is acceptable under anti money laundering  legislation. These checks and verifications will take time and may involve investment in technology or upskilling of people. All of this has  cost implications and will impact those practices which decide to register as ACSPs. Such firms must enhance their procedures and training and plan for this uplift in good time. Acting as an ACSP and performing verification and identity checking may be viable for a firm’s existing clients where the firm already knows much about the client . However , firms must give some pause for consideration of whether there is merit and the cost effectiveness of registering as an  ACSP to take on new business versus the risks which could potentially exist with this new business . Accountancy  firms  should perform their own risk assessment when deciding if they will take on this new business and firms should also ensure that the service is covered under their PII policy. Reminder to member firms to register as an ACSP If an eligible firm is willing to undertake the work involved in being an ACSP and is planning to verify the identity of its client directors and PSCs or wishes going forward to file information at Companies House on behalf of clients (or both) , it must  register to be an ACSP. Eligible firms are encouraged to register now and you can click to read more about how to register as a Companies House authorised corporate service provider and  Applying to register as a Companies House authorised agent - GOV.UK Firms are reminded that - To register you must be supervised for AML in the UK, - When completing the application process, you will be asked to provide your firm identity number, that will be your Institute firm number. Please ensure that the firm’s business name, address and any trading names provided to Companies House match what is recorded with the Institute, otherwise your application may be delayed, -A member’s name and membership number should not be used as the Institute’s authorisation for AML supervision is granted to firms not individuals , -if a sole practitioner is applying for authorisation, please use the unincorporated firm option, - You will be asked to complete identity verification as part of the application process, - There will be a registration fee of £55, payable to Companies House, - Once you are registered, you will be provided with a new digital account and unique identity number. This will allow you to file information and complete identity verification for your clients. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.  

From the Professional Accountancy team…... In December 2025 the Institute responded to a consultation by the Irish Dept of Enterprise Tourism and Employment on proposed changes to the Companies Act 2014 and related legislation. The consultation related to access to the residential addresses of company officers. The Institute welcomes the proposed changes in relation to directors’ addresses and we understand that the changes will generally be welcomed by the company secretarial community. Similar proposed changes are suggested in the drafting of the Co-Operative Societies Bill and the Registration of Limited Partnership and Business Names Bill. Progress on both these pieces of draft legislation is awaited and hopefully will be advanced by the Government in 2026. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.    

The UK Department of Business and Trade (DBT) has announced plans which seek to modernise Corporate Reporting requirements and make it easier for businesses to grow and invest. Some of the plans which DBT intend to bring forward include: An exemption for most medium-sized companies from the need to produce a Strategic Report. DBT have noted that this would mean that “medium-sized businesses who can benefit from existing exemptions will no longer need to prepare narrative reporting, so they can focus on running their business rather than producing information that is disproportionate to their scale and ownership model”. An exemption for wholly-owned subsidiaries from producing a strategic report if they are covered by the reporting of a UK parent. DBT have stated that this proposal would “eliminate duplicative reporting within corporate groups”. A removal of the requirement for preparing a Directors Report. The Department have noted that this report is often seen as a “cluttered, compliance-driven document that has accumulated numerous disclosures over time, which offers little useful insight for investors”. Under the proposal, some requirements which are deemed to be more useful, such as reporting on energy and emissions, would be retained and moved elsewhere in the Annual Report. In its announcement, the Minister for Small Business and Economic Transformation indicated his intention to deliver the proposed changes “as quickly as possible” In addition to the above proposals, DBT have announced an expansion of their non-financial reporting review to include financial reporting, remuneration reporting and governance reporting, as well as considering how reporting can be modernised for the digital age. In view of this expansion, the previously named “non-financial reporting review” will be renamed the “Modernisation of Corporate Reporting review”. To address this, DBT have announced its intention to hold a consultation on the corporate reporting framework next year. It has also issued a survey asking businesses to raise any issues they might have regarding regulation which is not fit for purpose.

Tips and pointers for the busy filing season  Important dates For the majority of Irish companies, the following timelines apply: For a financial year end date of 31 December, the 30 September is the most common Annual Return Date (ARD). Therefore, by Tuesday 25 November, 56 days from the ARD, the company’s Annual Return, financial statements and signed signature page should be electronically filed (only-no manual filing is permitted). Please note that not every 31 December year end has an ARD of 30 September so it is important to confirm the ARD and then it is 56 days from that date. Please click here for the Companies Registration Office information on peak filing. File early! We would encourage presenters to file early if at all possible. Do not leave filing till the last minute. The Companies Registration Office’s (CRO) position on timing of receipt of a document is when it has been received by the CRO and not when it has been sent by you or your agent. Therefore, if there are delays in the system which result in the documents being received after midnight on 25th November then the document is late even if it had been sent before midnight. Also, early filing will help to avoid problems with potential CRO systems and resource deficiencies. At a stakeholder meeting with the CRO on 3 September 2025 the CRO reported that it has a backlog of 20,000 B1’s to process. They estimate that this is a 6-week backlog. They anticipate that this will reduce by the beginning of peak filing season, but early filing may mitigate potential difficulties and delays. Please click for more companies office information on common errors on form B1. Other matters to keep in mind Please also check if there have been any changes in the company since the last annual return and that the forms have been filed to reflect these changes, and then update the B1 accordingly. Confirm that if you are claiming any exemptions such as audit exemption, abridgement or Section 357 Guarantee you are entitled to do so and check if there have been changes in the company size or the group thresholds. Remember also that the financial statements must be uploaded before the signature page is generated so anyone leaving it to the last day will have to make sure that the director and secretary are available to sign if there is no electronic filing agent , EFA appointed to the company. Please note that the Companies Registration Office (CRO) will not accept electronically signed documents. The signature page(s) must be physically signed i.e. “wet ink” and then scanned for submission. If you require help with CORE or have technical issues with filing your annual return, please contact the CRO Helpdesk support@cro-helpdesk.cloud.gov.ie. Agents who use software packages should contact their software vendor directly for information in relation to technical issues, such as upgrades of these systems. All other queries for Annual Returns can be directed to the dedicated mailbox CRO Annual Returns annualreturns@cro.ie Adverse consequences of late filing Late filing can have the following adverse consequences: Late filing fees Loss of audit exemption. The rules have changed since July 2025 .Click for a news item on the changes to audit exemption rules Possible application to district court for extension of time to file Involuntary strike off of the company Disqualification of director This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.    

UK Parliament has published a draft of the Companies (Directors’ Report) (Payment Reporting) Regulations 2025 (“Regulations”). It has also published a draft explanatory memorandum. The purpose of the draft Regulations is stated to be to make changes to reporting requirements to require large companies to report information about their payment practices and performance within directors’ reports. For further information on company size thresholds please click to access the Institute webpage on UK company thresholds. The draft Regulations when enacted will require the directors' report to include items such as the payment period specified in a company’s standard payment terms in its qualifying contracts between it and its suppliers. Where there are variations to standard payment terms, details of the variations and notifications/consultations with suppliers before making the variation should also be reported. Details should also be included about payments made including percentages and total sums not made within the company’s payment period. See the draft Regulations for full details. “Qualifying contracts” are defined in the draft Regulations, and the definition relates to exclusion of contracts for financial services and other terms dealing with the choice of law of the contract. The draft Regulations are stated to come into force on 1 January 2026 and will have effect in respect of a company’s financial year beginning on or after 1st January 2026. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.    

Readers may find interesting the Irish Revenue Commissioners e brief on Taxation of Partnerships dated July 2025. In addition to providing guidance on the taxation of partnerships, the e brief describes the background to partnerships, the 3 types of partnership available under Irish law which are general, limited and investment limited partnerships. It also details the main types of partners, general partners, salaried partners, fixed share partners and limited partners and gives some information on joint and several liability.   This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

Minister Burke has announced the commencement of Section 22 of the Companies (Corporate Governance, Enforcement and Regulatory Provisions) Act 2024.  This provision relates to a change to the current audit exemption regime, whereby small and micro sized companies will not, in future, automatically lose the privilege of audit exemption on a first occasion, in a five-year period, of late filing of an annual return with the Companies Registration Office. Section 22 will replace section 363 of the Companies Act 2014. Section 363 in summary provided that if a company failed to submit an annual return it would lose its audit exemption for the succeeding two years. Section 22 amends this and introduces a graduated regime which means that audit exemption will only be lost if a company files its annual return late more than once in a five-year period. Section 22 also provides that a company’s first annual return or previous failure to file an annual return before the commencement of the provision (as the company has already lost its audit exemption) shall not be considered a previous failure. This is a matter that we have made numerous representations on for the last number of years. While we advise members to file on time, there will be genuine reasons why a filing deadline is missed and commencing this provision should reduce the burden on those companies.   It is great to see the commencement of this piece of legislation before the peak filing season commences which will give clarity to members who may need to benefit from it.   Please see the press release here. Please see the DETE press release here and a notice from the CRO.      

The Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA) has today published its second Annual Report. The CEA writes that the Report details the CEA’s activities during 2024 in furthering its strategic objectives as set out in its Statement of Strategy 2022-2025. The Report features 22 case studies that highlight the wide-ranging impact of the CEA. Those case studies evidence a careful and tiered approach towards the utilisation of the CEA’s suite of enforcement powers. Please click the link to read the CEA press release with a summary of the highlights of the report and click to read the CEA 2nd Annual Report. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

From the Professional Accountancy team…... Update of 16 July 2025 :the High Court put a stay on the restriction order for four months to give the directors time to organise their affairs. It is not yet clear if the directors will appeal the decision to restrict them . Background In the  case of Downtul Limited (in liquidation ) Patrick O'Connell, Ciaran Butler and Colum Butler the liquidator of Downtul Limited (“Downtul”) sought to have two directors (the Respondents) restricted for a period of 5 years from acting as director or secretary of a company. Downtul entered a lease (“Lease”) with Stephen Court Limited (landlord) in respect of a property from which a Starbucks outlet was operated. A separate related company (Atercin Liffey Unlimited Company, “Atercin”) operated the Starbucks. Downtul did not occupy or use the leased property and had no income, or means to generate income, to discharge the liabilities arising under the Lease, including rent. There was also no evidence of any enforceable mechanism for Downtul to recover monies from Atercin to meet its liabilities. Restriction of director -acting honestly & responsibly The case established that Downtul bore the liability and burden of the Lease. The separate related company Atercin occupied and traded from the property and earned revenue from that trade. At all times since the Lease was entered, Atercin and not Downtul had occupied the Property and operated the coffee shop throughout the term of the Lease.  There was no evidence of any agreement or consideration being given to the rights of Downtul. In allowing Downtul to enter and maintain these arrangements, and in failing to ensure an enforceable mechanism by which Downtul could obtain the funds necessary to discharge its liabilities as they fell due or otherwise protect its position, the Respondents failed to demonstrate responsible conduct with regard to the interests of Downtul as a separate legal entity within the Group. Mainly for the above reasons the judge was not satisfied the respondents has acted responsibly in conducting the affairs of Downtul. It was noted that a finding of illegality or unlawfulness is not required to restrict a director under S819. the fact that a transaction is not unlawful does not mean it is not relevant to assessing a director’s honesty or responsibility. The judge also said that the failure to keep proper accounting records, the omission of material disclosures from the financial statements and the failure to minute a single board meeting since 2017 are also – independently of her primary findings of irresponsibility – separate grounds on which she was not satisfied that the Respondents acted responsibly. As she was not satisfied that the Respondents acted responsibly with regard to the conduct of the affairs of Downtul the judge said she was mandated by section 819(2) to make the declaration of restriction sought by the Liquidator.   Accounting records and materiality/disclosure/corporate governance The judgement stated that there were no accounting records, disclosures in financial statements, or board minutes which even refer to the apparent arrangements between Downtul and Atercin. The financial statements make no reference to the Lease or to the receipt of monies from Atercin to pay the rent and other charges associated with the Starbucks property. This the court said underlines the lack of transparency in relation to the affairs of Downtul. Company accounts and records should contain a true and fair view of the company’s financial position. The case also considered the issue of disclosure of material transactions under FRS 102(1A) to ensure a “true and fair view” is given of the company’s financial position. The judge said that a responsible view of Downtul’s financial position would lead to the conclusion that the Lease and issues that arose with the landlord (rent suspension, legal proceedings) are matters that would be material for a user of the financial statements. The evidence and perspective of the Liquidator that these items collectively are material and significant for Downtul was accepted by the court. The judge found in the particular circumstances of Downtul, and the specific evidence adduced, the books that were kept were not sufficient to demonstrate a responsible approach by the Respondents to the maintenance of accounting records such as to enable compliance with section 282 of the Companies Act 2014. the fact that it is a small company or a company with limited activity does not provide an excuse or justification for not maintaining even a minimum record of Downtul’s transactions (quite apart from the more fundamental issues with Downtul’s interaction with Atercin). Finally, on the corporate governance side the judge noted that the Respondents chose to become directors of more than 170 and more than 200 companies respectively. Being a director of so many companies brings with it onerous and important responsibilities. She was not suggesting this is a light task when the Respondents are responsible for some 150- 200 companies, but it was the Respondents who made the decision to incorporate and direct the affairs of such a significant number of companies. The fact they have so burdened themselves cannot absolve them of the obligation to separately discharge the duties incumbent on them in each of those roles. The only question is whether they acted responsibly with regard to the affairs of Downtul. In the absence of any record of a meeting or decision with regard to Downtul from 2017 onwards, she simply could not be, and was not, satisfied in that respect. Conclusion The judgment contains an extensive examination of the grounds for restricting a director under section 819 of Companies Act 2014. There are other useful aspects to this judgment also, including for example an account of the relevant duties of expert witnesses. Readers should note that the judge found that the respondents discharged the burden of showing they acted honestly. However, because she found they had not acted responsibly this was enough to trigger the operation of the restriction provisions in section 819. It should also be noted that the directors have been restricted for 5 years, not disqualified. Restricted means that the person cannot act as a company director (or secretary) for 5 years unless the company of which they wish to be director has an allotted share capital of €100,000 (in the case of companies other than PLCs) with each allotted share to be paid for in cash. Readers can find out more about disqualification of directors in the Corporate Enforcement Authority’s very useful note on the subject CEA Information Note 2024/1 -Circumstances leading to disqualification under the Companies Act 2014 and the associated consequences. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.                    

One of the measures set out in the UK Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act is one to improve transparency by making more company financial information available to the public.   Companies House has announced that over the coming days it will start to contact by email all the UK companies on their register to let them know that from 1 April 2027, all accounts filings must be made using commercial software. From then web and paper routes will be closed for accounts filings but will remain open for other statutory filings.   UK Accounts filing options will be also streamlined from April 2027 for small and micro-entity companies. From then micro-entities will be required to file a copy of their balance sheet and profit and loss account. Small companies will be required to file a copy of balance sheet, directors’ report, auditor’s report (unless exempt) and profit and loss account.  Companies will no longer be able to prepare and file ‘abridged’ accounts. Related changes include updates to audit exemptions and accounting reference periods. For more information on these planned changes readers can check out Changes to accounts article on Companies‘ House website. This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.

from the Professional Accountancy team ... The ‘28th regime’ a new EU legal framework for innovative companies is  a proposed legal framework that is additional to the national legal frameworks of the 27 Member States .It was referenced in the European Commission’s Competitiveness Compass of January 2025 and the European Commission's work programme of February 2025 .The idea behind it is that the EU will offer a parallel, elective legal framework that businesses can choose to operate under ,simplifying applicable rules and  bypassing the different national legal frameworks. In June 2025 the EU Commissioner for Justice Democracy and the Rule of Law ,Michael Mc Grath, appointed Dr Tom Courtney a solicitor ,leading author on Irish company law and previous chair of the Irish Company Law Review Group as his special adviser to advise him on the proposal for a new 28th regime company .Dr Courtney writes that this is a very important EU initiative to make it possible for companies to benefit from a simpler harmonised set of EU wide rules . This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in these pages purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the pages. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of these pages, we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained in these pages.  

The Institute has today published a webpage on Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 - Changes in Companies House.  The aim of this webpage is to inform members of the recent Companies House identity verification changes and how to register as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider. These identity verification requirements came into effect on a voluntary basis on 8 April 2025 and will be mandatory for all company directors and People with Significant Control from Autumn 2025.  It also sets out other changes to be introduced by Companies House at a later date and reminds members of the changes from phase 1 last year.