Adverse weather can bring disruption to businesses and their staff. Gemma O’Connor explains how an adverse weather policy can help employers to minimise its impact Adverse weather can bring power outages, high winds, and flooding and can cause major destruction of towns and villages across the country. Furthermore, employers dealing with storm and weather warnings may also face staff absenteeism. So, what can they do if employees are unable to be at work for the day because of the effects of poor weather conditions? Experts recommend putting an adverse weather policy in place. Pay obligations Payment obligation is a common topic employers ask about when bad weather strikes. A strict interpretation of the law allows employers to determine whether payment is owed to employees for workdays they miss due to extreme weather. If a company’s premises are open but employees are absent, there is no legal obligation to pay them for what is technically an unauthorised absence. Choosing to withhold pay should be considered with care, however. Doing so may affect staff morale and your reputation as an employer. Employees may also rely on prior experiences to argue that payment is due. If an has organisation paid absent employees during a previous weather warning, they will expect the same going forward. During an extreme weather event, it is possible that companies may need to close their premises. When employees are sent home or told not to come to work due to adverse weather, it is recommended that they be paid as normal. Employee options If employees can’t attend work due to the extreme weather, there are a few options available: Ask them to work from home and continue to pay them as normal. Allow them to make up any missed time later. With the agreement of the employees, the organisation could deduct any absences from their paid annual leave entitlement. Many people are already currently working from home. Employers with remote working arrangements should include a clause on working from home in their adverse weather policy. This clause could specify, for example, that staff are permitted to work from home during periods of bad weather and will be paid as normal even if the employer’s premises are closed. Change of roster An employer is entitled to change a roster at short notice in exceptional events, including extreme weather. Keep in mind that outside of these exceptional circumstances, however, employees are entitled to a notice of at least 24 hours for any roster change. Employee safety As an employer, the safety of employees should always be paramount. An employer’s statutory duty is to provide a safe place of work. This also includes ensuring that employees are not required to undertake a hazardous journey to get to work. Employers should know that, if public transport isn’t operating, they face a heightened risk of claims and reports to the Health & Safety Authority (HSA) by employees who suffer accidents on their way to work. Time for a policy Adverse weather can be a reminder and an opportunity to develop your own internal policy regarding how weather warnings will be handled. If this policy is reasonable and clearly communicated to employees, organisations can minimise their exposure to the winters of employee discontent. Gemma O'Connor is Head of Service at Peninsula Ireland

As 2024 unfolds amidst continued global challenges, Loretta O’Sullivan outlines why the island of Ireland will still likely see some economic growth We are just a few weeks into 2024 and it has already acquired many labels. It's the year of rate cuts, war and global elections. Despite this, the all-island economy is expected to be a year of growth. EY Ireland's Winter Economic Eye report forecasts reasonably solid growth in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and a modest expansion in Northern Ireland (NI). Outlined below are the four forces we see shaping both economies in 2024. 1. A subdued external environment The world economy is recovering from a multitude of shocks – the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and decades-high inflation. The likelihood of a soft landing has increased, but geopolitical tensions, including the conflict in the Middle East and the Red Sea attacks, are among many headwinds. Prospects for key trading partners in 2024 are mixed, with growth set to slow in the US, but due to pick up in the Eurozone and the UK. 2. A turn in monetary policy After introducing a series of interest rate hikes in 2022 and 2023, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England are both on hold. Higher borrowing costs are expected to weigh on business spending decisions in 2024. Proactive digitalisation and decarbonisation agendas should provide support, however, and we can look forward to rate cuts later this year. The Irish government is also undertaking a large-scale capital spending programme to enhance public infrastructure and underpin digital and green transitions. In NI, the restoration of power-sharing and a Stormont Executive should encourage future investment. 3. Inflation is on the retreat Inflation has eased significantly and the passing on of lower wholesale energy prices to household bills and business costs, coupled with the transmission of monetary policy to economic activity, points to further easing ahead. In ROI, an inflation rate of 3.0 percent is forecast for 2024, falling to 2.0 percent in 2025. This downward trend will alleviate pressure on household purchasing power and improve consumer confidence, which bodes well for consumer expenditure. 4. Warm labour markets While the ROI and NI labour markets put in a strong performance in 2023, signs of softening are beginning to emerge and some cooling is likely this year. Nonetheless, unemployment rates are projected to remain low by historical standards and many businesses will continue to experience staff recruitment and retention challenges. Given the tight labour market and some compensation for past inflation, wage increases are also anticipated. This year is shaping up to be one of rate cuts, elevated geopolitical tensions and monumental elections. Yet, amidst these events, households and businesses can likely expect to see some growth across the two economies on the island of Ireland. Loretta O’Sullivan is Chief Economist and Partner at EY Ireland

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has announced important revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code).  The revisions aim to enhance transparency and accountability of UK plc and deliver on the FRC’s intentions following the FRC’s largest ever stakeholder consultation on the Code in 2023. The FRC has kept changes to the Code to the minimum that are necessary. The FRC is conscious that the expectations for effective governance must be targeted and proportionate. In addition the FRC has published guidance to the Code. The purpose of this guidance is to support those who use the Code by providing advice, further detail and examples but it is not intended to be prescriptive. To make the guidance user-friendly, the FRC has included links in the Code to relevant sections of the guidance, and links in the guidance to other materials which may be of interest. The FRC will be keeping the guidance under regular review to ensure it is relevant and up to date.  The revised code can be accessed here.

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions Q. My organisation is going through a lot of change; there is a new leadership structure at the top, but some changes are still undecided. I am hoping that some roles in my area (which were regionalised about eight years ago) will be recentralised under my management. While this has not yet been decided, the regions have got ahead of this with quite a public challenge to the leadership to retain roles at regional level. They have much more clout than my small team and me. A. I am going to assume that your query is about the quality of the work your function provides rather than simply headcount. In any case, a couple of things are immediately clear: Whatever happens, your relationship with the regional directors, as well as with other colleagues currently fulfilling regional roles, is very important. This ‘inter-regnum’ period could be very useful to all of you (in the regions and centrally) by giving you time to get together to work on issues relating to this restructure with a view to making improvements – no matter the eventual outcome. Perhaps someone on the senior leadership team could initiate and sponsor this. You need to play a long game; organisations make changes all the time and how you are seen to deal with this issue will impact your profile. Avoid ‘either/or’ thinking (i.e. ‘they either report to the regions or to me’). There could be many ways to create win-win outcomes. Until a decision is made, there is room for negotiation (see the book suggestion below). I suggest you carefully work out a couple of positions, including: Your ideal outcome (and how to transition to it); Acceptable outcomes if you don’t get your ideal outcome (e.g. dotted line responsibility, developing the more interesting aspects of your role, new structures to support your team, developmental support, etc); and Unwelcome outcomes (and how to avoid them). It could be useful to work on this with your team. I have no doubt that they would have a lot to add to the conversation. Q. My team is under huge pressure – as am I. I try hard to help them, but they keep coming back with the same issues and they are very negative. A. It is the leader’s role to help, but how do we help? Sometimes, it’s by fixing, helping and advising.  And sometimes it’s by listening and empowering the team member to fix it themselves.  As leaders, we are often scared by negativity and we jump in quickly with advice and fixes. I suggest you listen deeply to your direct reports. When they bring up something negative, stay with it and help them to explore it.   The pull to fix is great, so this is much more difficult than it sounds. Arranging to meet to discuss the issue will give you the time to pull together some great questions that will help your team member think through the issue and come up with solutions. Of course, you can suggest solutions too – but people are much more likely to listen to your suggestions when you have helped them to think things through first. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant at Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie If you read one thing... Getting to yes – negotiating an agreement without giving in by Roger Fisher and William Ury. We often go into negotiations with an  ‘either/or’ attitude. Either they win or I do. Getting to Yes offers a framework for ‘principled negotiation’ helping us to come up with creative options where both parties (or more) can achieve what they want. 

The new 15 percent global corporate tax rate will have a big impact in countries across the world, but arguably nowhere more so than in Ireland’s small FDI-reliant economy. Three Chartered Accountants dissect the implications of the tax change and how it could reshape our economic landscape. Paul Dillon, Tax Partner, Duignan Carthy O’Neill Ireland has signed Pillar Two of the OECD agreement on taxation into Irish law, introducing a minimum corporation tax rate of 15 percent for large domestic groups or multinationals with revenue of €750 million or more in at least two of the four preceding fiscal years. The current 12.5 percent corporation tax rate will remain in place for most companies in Ireland, with certain groups having to pay a top-up tax of 2.5 percent – the qualified domestic top-up tax (QDTT) – directly to the Irish exchequer.   The QDTT is initially due for periods commencing 1 January 2024, but the first payments will not be made until 2026.  The rules are complex and will require significant investment from the companies it applies to so that they can understand the scope and application of these new provisions.  In the short-term, Pillar Two provisions could lead to the Irish exchequer collecting additional tax as it is estimated that close to 1,600 entities in Ireland will be liable to pay QDTT. If a group entity is liable to pay QDTT in a jurisdiction such as Ireland, the top-up taxes due outside Ireland are expected to reduce to zero. These safe harbour rules should protect the Irish tax base and result in more taxes being collected in Ireland in the short term. It is also worth noting that any QDTT paid in Ireland should be allowed as a credit against what is termed an Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) or Undertaxed Profit Rule (UPR) tax liability a group is due to pay in other jurisdictions. This will provide additional protection to the multinational tax base in Ireland. In brief, the IIR requires the ultimate parent entity of the group to determine if its constituent entities have paid the minimum 15 percent tax in each jurisdiction and pay the additional taxes in its jurisdiction to meet the minimum tax rate.  The UPR taxes groups that are not resident in a jurisdiction that has adopted the Pillar Two rules and applies to groups not paying the minimum 15 percent tax. The UPR rule will require an increase in tax at the subsidiary level.  In the short term, most economic commentators believe that the new Pillar Two provisions will lead to Ireland collecting additional tax. In the longer term, the taxes collected will depend on the economic presence of groups in Ireland and how they organise their structures going forward.  The impact of the proposed Pillar One changes, which will reallocate some taxing rights based on market jurisdictions, may ultimately have an adverse effect on the tax base in Ireland and could, in the longer term, reduce the taxes collected from multinationals in Ireland. Alma de Bruijn, Tax Director, PwC Ireland The introduction of a global minimum effective tax rate of 15 percent has come after a lengthy period of negotiations as part of implementation of Pillar Two. Ireland was actively involved in these negotiations, securing the removal of “at least” with respect to the rate and thereby ensuring that the rate could not be increased in the future. The newly introduced provisions, which will lead to an effective 15 percent tax rate, could lead to incremental Irish corporate tax for many companies, i.e. above Ireland’s long-standing corporate tax rate of 12.5 percent.  Ireland’s corporate tax policy has generally focused on ensuring substance-based investment, coupled with a rounded tax regime of incentives.  A significant number of multinationals are well established in Ireland, and while Pillar Two may increase the effective tax rate of multinational groups, the new rules should not act as an incentive to move investment out of Ireland in favour of other OECD jurisdictions.  This is supported by the OECD’s recent taxation working paper, The Global Minimum Tax and the Taxation of MNE Profit, in which a key finding was that the global minimum tax substantially reduces the incentives to shift profits.  It is also worth noting that the domestic effective tax rate applicable in many other jurisdictions will significantly exceed the 15 percent effective rate that will apply under Pillar Two. While the introduction of the new global minimum tax rate marks the biggest change in the corporate tax landscape in a generation, it is a change that has been embraced by Ireland.  Ireland has been clear in its commitment to the implementation of the Pillar Two rules from the outset and has consulted with stakeholders throughout the implementation process. This commitment and consultation have offered certainty to businesses.  I think that, despite the change in rate for large multinationals, Ireland will continue to remain competitive with a highly educated, skilled workforce, direct access to the EU market and international supply chains, and a stable business environment that promotes investment. James Smyth, Partner, Deloitte  Following the adoption of the EU directive on the adoption of a global minimum tax by EU Member States, Ireland has taken steps to enact the required legislation to comply with the provisions of the directive.  The Irish legislation on the global minimum tax came into effect from the start of this year. The reality for any impacted group is that the rules are very complicated and require careful analysis to assess the impact fully. It’s fair to say that the level of complexity in the new rules is not like anything we have seen before in the tax world and requires an increased level of interaction between global tax and finance teams. The likely impact on Ireland is difficult to assess and there are certainly different views on it. The 15 percent minimum tax rate could impact Ireland’s competitiveness, but the wider offering for businesses looking to invest in Ireland extends far beyond tax alone, including an English-speaking population, an educated workforce, membership of the EU and favourable business conditions.  The mechanics of how the rules work are such that the imposition of the global minimum tax rate of 15 percent in Ireland should not automatically result in an additional tax liability of 2.5 percent (being the differential between Ireland’s headline rate of corporation tax of 12.5 percent and the new global minimum tax rate of 15 percent).  The devil is in the detail and the new rules could result in a neutral or positive impact on Ireland.

When and how the war between Israel and Hamas ends, Israelis and Palestinians will have to find a way to live side by side, writes Judy Dempsey The long-running conflict between Israel and the Palestinians has been one of missed opportunities. The 1995 Oslo Peace Accords were supposed to usher in a kind of co-existence. That didn’t happen. Israel did not stop withdrawing the illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. It designated areas for Jewish settlers.  The Palestinian Authority (PA), bankrolled by the European Union, didn’t use the opportunity to introduce democratic reforms. The former head of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) Yasser Arafat could not make the transition from freedom fighter to democrat.   His successor Abu Mazen has presided over a corrupt PA, refusing to hold elections due back in 2006. He has lost credibility among Palestinians. Mazen did Israel’s bidding: keeping the lid on opposition to the occupation and preventing the establishment of a vibrant civil society that could challenge his authority.   In Gaza, the Islamic Hamas movement took over the strip in 2007 after ousting the discredited PA. Hamas is the precursor to the Muslim Brotherhood encouraged by Israel in the 1980s as a means to divide and weaken the PLO. Since 2007, Hamas has run Gaza with an iron fist. It has its own agenda: to not recognise the state of Israel, even to destroy it.  Fast forward to 7 October and Israel’s devastating response to the gruesome Hamas massacre of Israeli civilians. This will make it more difficult than ever to change a mindset on both sides concerning the need to end the cycle of violence and resume peace talks.   Gaza is in ruins. Suffering people have nowhere to go. At least 20,000 have been killed. There is no systematic flow of humanitarian aid. Hamas shows no signs of negotiating over Israeli hostages.  As for Israel, its right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – who never believed in a two-state solution and who is (conveniently) beholden to his far-right-wing coalition partners – believes he can destroy Hamas.   This ignores the day after for the hapless, suffering citizens of Gaza and for Israelis who have been shocked by the failures of their military and intelligence services.    The day after is difficult to think about. The United States and the European Union still support a two-state solution but how might it be achieved? A few ideas:  Benjamin Netanyahu needs to be replaced with a moderate leader.    Abu Mazen and the PA need to be replaced by younger people who want democratic change.  A two-state solution is impossible unless Jewish settlements in the West Bank are dismantled. They prevent a viable Palestinian state.  Middle Eastern countries must play a central role. They see the wider impact of the Israeli-Hamas conflagration. The Arab countries, and even possibly Iran – a pivotal player in supporting Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthi rebels in Yemen – cannot afford a war in the Middle East.   Egypt and Jordan (which have peace agreements with Israel) and Saudi Arabia (which had considered establishing relations with Israel before 7 October), need to take the diplomatic and political lead in ending the war between Israel and Hamas.    Former US President Donald Trump missed an opportunity when he didn’t link the Abraham Accords – signed in 2020 by the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan to normalise relations with Israel – to negotiating a peace deal between Israel and Palestine.  A two-state solution is unthinkable today. Anger and radicalisation on both sides will demand time and a special mediation to make any sustainable peace possible, but what is the alternative?  Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe.  *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the February/March 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

  In this week’s Sustainability/ESG bulletin, we invite readers to take our survey on climate action where we want to to understand your knowledge of supports available for businesses.  You can also read about our recent webinar on collaboration between finance and IT teams to create effective sustainability reporting programmes, and two new diplomas from Chartered Accountants Ireland on Sustainability Reporting and Sustainability Assurance. Also covered is Ireland’s Business for Biodiversity members hub, Irish business and human rights, more investment in safe walking and cycling in Ireland, Invest NI's Grow Green programme, European developments, a software guide to carbon accounting, and the usual resources, articles, and upcoming events. IRELAND Chartered Accountants Ireland – The Climate Survey Chartered Accountants Ireland is running a short survey to understand our members’ knowledge of the Irish Government climate targets and the supports available for businesses to help achieve them.  Link to survey Watch back: Chartered Accountants Ireland, CSRD – Building Finance & IT partnerships Click here to find links to our webinar from 7 February 2024 on how Finance and IT Teams can partner to deliver sustainability reporting programmes compliant with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ('CSRD') requirements. Speakers David Codd and Paul Power discuss how to establish effective collaboration between the finance and IT teams, what pitfalls to avoid and how to build a strong partnership to deliver an effective sustainability reporting programme. Call for Irish businesses to sign up to Business for Biodiversity members’ hub The Business for Biodiversity Ireland platform is calling on Irish businesses of every size and sector to come together to accelerate action for nature by signing up to their members’ hub. The Government-backed national platform's membership function – free until 31 March 2024 – includes an easy-to-follow roadmap which aims to demystify the multitude of biodiversity frameworks, guidance documents and tools for businesses facing new rules on reporting their impacts on nature. Irish business and human rights Trinity Business School’s Centre for Social Innovation has published its latest Irish business and human rights benchmark report into the 50 largest companies in Ireland. The report finds that voluntary action is not driving uptake, with corporate uptake of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) “remaining a work in progress”, with 52 percent of companies assessed scoring 30 percent or less. The Government’s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights is currently being drafted. Separately, the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission has told the UN that Ireland is violating the economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights of “entire sections” of Irish society. In its report submitted recently to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as part of Ireland’s fourth periodic review, the Commission raised particular concerns over housing and homelessness crises, extreme poverty, income and wealth inequalities and the climate. Ireland to be referred to CJEU on water plans The European Commission has decided to refer Ireland and five other countries to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for failure to finalise the revision of their water plans. In a separate decision, the European Commission has called on Ireland to comply with the Urban Wastewater Directive. Ireland has two months to respond and address the shortcomings raised by the Commission, failing which the Commission may decide to issue a reasoned opinion.  €1 billion investment by Government since 2020 to prioritise safe walking and cycling The Government has announced investment of €290m in funding to local authorities across Ireland to support the rollout of walking and cycling infrastructure in 2024. This brings to over €1bn the Government’s total investment for active travel infrastructure since 2020. This investment has seen more than 600km of cycling, walking and wheeling infrastructure delivered since 2020 under the NTA Active Travel Programme. The full list of Active Travel projects receiving funding can be found here. NORTHERN IRELAND Ambition To Grow | Go Green programme Invest NI is looking to support ambitious, innovative businesses in the Green Economy offering a product or tradeable service that can create new employment opportunities and grow sales outside Northern Ireland. Through its Ambition to Grow | Go Green programme, it is calling for applications from Northern Ireland businesses that have a focus on sustainable activities. Details of funding levels and eligibility criteria can be found here.  EUROPE  The European Commission has recommended that the EU reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90 percent by 2040, compared to 1990 levels. This is an interim target to be achieved by 2040, a ‘steppingstone’ between its 2030 emissions reduction target of 55 percent and its overall goal of ‘climate neutrality’ goal by 2050. By 2022 the bloc had reduced emissions by 32.5 percent compared to 1990. Following a legislative proposal made by the next Commission after the summer’s EU election, the European Parliament and EU members will need to reach agreement before any 2040 target can become enshrined in law.   The European Commission this week adopted an Industrial Carbon Management Strategy which presents a framework of the actions necessary to establish a Single Market for CO2. Industrial carbon management involves the use of a range of technologies to capture, store, transport and use CO2 emissions from industrial facilities, as well as to remove CO2 from the atmosphere.   The European Parliament and the Council have reached provisional political agreement on the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA). The Act is part of the Green Deal Industrial Plan, which sets out how the EU will scale up manufacturing capacity for the net-zero technologies and products required to meet EU's ambitious climate targets. Today's agreement is now subject to the formal approval of both EU co-legislators, and once adopted, will enter into force after its publication in the Official Journal of the EU.    The European Parliament and the Council have also reached provisional political agreement on proposed common rules to promote the repair of goods for consumers. Once adopted, the new rules will introduce a new ‘right to repair' for consumers, both within and beyond the legal guarantee, which will make it easier and more cost-effective for them to repair products instead of simply replacing them with new ones. Separately, the European Parliament published an infographic showing facts and figures on E-waste in the EU. GLOBAL Carbon accounting – a software guide Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ) has published a Carbon Accounting Software Guide which explores the two predominant tracking methods of tracking and reporting on carbon emissions - Spend Tracking and Activity Tracking. The article describes the pros and cons of each approach, and how to embrace carbon accounting. Did you know? Chartered Accountants Ireland is launching two new Diplomas in Sustainability in March 2024: a Diploma in Sustainability Reporting and a Diploma in Auditing and Assuring Sustainability Reporting.  Join us for a virtual open day, including a Q&A, where you can find out more from lead tutor Dr Louise Gorman, Trinity College Dublin. Date: Wednesday 14 February Time: 12.00pm – 1.00pm Register your place now: Webinar Registration - Zoom Resources  Entrepreneurship for All Platform A training platform initiative developed by the European Union is now offering three levels of expertise (Beginner, Intermediate, or Advanced), centred around the four pillars of Entrepreneurial Competences; Financial Literacy for Entrepreneurs; Sustainability Competences for Entrepreneurs; and Digital Competences for Entrepreneurs. Find out more here. EENergy Grant Aid Now Open The EEN has launched supports for SMEs in their efforts to improve their energy efficiency including for their buildings, processes and production lines. Find out more here. Articles  “Wake-up call”: Big firms’ flakiness on human rights puts them in Brussels’s firing line (The Currency (Subscriber Only)) The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive: Getting to grips with double materiality (Accountancy Ireland) Upcoming Events   Accountancy Europe Supporting SMEs with sustainability information  Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) data requests that SMEs are getting from financial institutions and large value chain partners, voluntary initiatives such as the planned non-listed SME standard for sustainability reporting, the OECD’s work and industry-led initiatives, and SMEs’ support requirements for their sustainable transition  21 February, 17:00 - 19:00 Brussels time  A4S Sustainability In Action Webinar: Management Information  An interactive webinar focusing on techniques to help finance professionals develop and integrate information needed to respond to social and environmental risks and opportunities into core management information processes.  27 February, 08:00    A4S Sustainability In Action Webinar: Capitals Accounting  An interactive webinar exploring various aspects of capitals accounting and how it is being applied in practice. The discussion will explore the information needed to tackle a range of impacts.  28 March, 08:00 GMT  Chartered Accountants Ireland ESG Masterclass: Take your sustainability knowledge to the next level (ROI/NI)  Masterclass designed for all professional accountants working in business or practice, wishing to consolidate their knowledge and understanding of the sustainability regulatory, reporting and assurance landscape.  18 April, 08:30 – 13.00  National Sustainability Summit 2024  Dates: May 28-29  Locations: RDS    Network for Chartered Accountants working on ESG projects  Are you a Chartered Accountant working in ESG or working on ESG-related projects? Would you like an opportunity to engage with other Chartered Accountants working in this space to share insights, challenges and opportunities?  Chartered Accountants Ireland now has a network to allow members working in sustainability/ESG to meet and discuss all matters of interest re ESG and accounting.  When: Wednesday, 28 February, 14:00-15.30  Where: Teams  If you would like to attend, please email sustainability@charteredaccountants.ie  You can find information, guidance and supports to understand sustainability and meet the challenges it presents in our online Sustainability Centre.

Ronan Murray, the incoming Managing Partner of EY Ireland’s Cork office tells us how his Big Four career progressed from audit to mergers and acquisitions, and gives his take on M&A trends in 2024  Ronan Murray is the incoming Managing Partner of EY Ireland’s Cork office. Kerry-born Murray has lived in Cork for over 25 years, forging a successful career in corporate finance, starting in audit and progressing to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory and services. As Partner, Corporate Finance, Strategy and Transactions, with EY Ireland in Cork for the past two years, Murray has provided strategic advice to Irish companies on acquisitions and disposals. Q. Tell us a bit about your background and education?  I grew up in Tralee and I’m still firmly connected to family, friends and clients in Co. Kerry, but I have lived and worked in Cork for a long time. It’s a fantastic place and my two daughters will be proud Corkonians! I started out studying commerce at University College Cork (UCC), graduating in 2001 with a commerce degree and returned to UCC in 2010 to complete an Executive MBA with a focus on developmental leadership education in a knowledge economy.  I met my wife Aideen Creedon, Head of Internal Audit at UCC, while we were both on our Chartered Accountants Ireland training contracts in Cork and studying for our exams.  Q. What inspired you to pursue a career in accountancy?  I remember during the graduate intake period at university reading the various job brochures from companies and organisations. I was struck by the Chartered Accountant (CA) qualification being a portable tool you could use as a foundation to build a wide and varied career in professional services. It certainly hasn’t disappointed. I have been able to gain wide-ranging experience from external audit to transaction services over the course of 22 years working for Big Four firms.  Through secondments, I’ve had the opportunity to live and work in both New York and London.  I started in audit, qualifying as a Chartered Accountant in 2005 and becoming an External Audit Manager in 2006.  I joined the Transactions Team at EY in 2007 and worked until 2016 in various roles before returning to the firm in 2022 as a Partner in our M&A/Corporate Finance Team. I may be biased, but in the world of corporate finance and M&A, the CA qualification is regarded as a differentiator and a distinct advantage.  It is a badge of honour you can take with you into any boardroom environment. The skills I have acquired through the qualification have served me exceptionally well throughout my career.  Q. As your career progressed, what prompted you to move from audit into M&A?   There is one moment that stands out as an important pivot point for me. Back in 2007, I got to spend some time working with a partner preparing the content for an information memorandum relating to a potential transaction.  I was intrigued and excited by the prospect of supporting on the deal. It was this experience that made me consider moving into M&A. I really enjoy the variety the role offers day-to-day. I get to work with so many different people and businesses. It is fast-paced and I find helping business owners to achieve their goals hugely rewarding. My audit experience has been essential in helping me to understand the core value drivers in business and, over time, it enabled me to move towards the M&A side of the market. Q. What does your day-to-day role involve?  I spend most of my time working with business owners to devise strategies that will allow them to de-risk and obtain growth capital while executing a transaction that delivers value.  Achieving the best outcome is a fine balancing act. It’s important to take time to meet with owners, funders, legal intermediaries and wider market players to ensure your “finger is on the pulse” when it comes to potential opportunities for your clients. I have a lot of meetings with local and international investors so I can fully understand their investment criteria and match them with suitable Irish companies.  The rest of my time is focused on deal execution – preparing information memorandums, agreeing heads of terms and reviewing sale and purchase agreements in tandem with legal colleagues.  From a private equity perspective, business owners often have an opportunity to obtain growth capital and commence a ‘buy and build’ process with a defined M&A strategy.  Dealmakers are looking at synergies across the various functions of a larger organisation. Investors are focused on the objectives behind a transaction. Often, the deal is about unlocking the potential and value that exists in an organisation.  Over the course of my career, I’ve been involved in hundreds of exciting transactions on both the buy and sell side. Some of the recent stand-out deals include the sale of PFH Technology Group to Japanese firm Ricoh and Phoenix Equity’s investment in Nostra Technologies. I have also enjoyed working with Zeus Packaging on several acquisitions in recent years.  Q. What are the biggest trends in the M&A market currently?  There was a global slowdown in transaction activity in 2022 and the first half of 2023, primarily due to uncertain debt markets and macroeconomic factors.  The M&A landscape has since improved and the Irish market is well-placed to see an uplift in deal volumes this year, as Irish assets continue to attract interest from investors, both local and international.  Ireland is a very competitive country internationally with an innovative, technology-driven, service-focused and open trading economy.  Our regions have grown and developed into destinations of choice for global companies, as well as providing a platform for indigenous private companies to develop and scale.  Acquirers are seeking strategic assets and the fundamentals of the Irish economy remain strong, making Ireland an attractive location for investment.  Private equity investment in the mid-market, driven by the availability of ‘dry powder’, is also playing a much deeper role in the Irish market. As we move forward, private business optimism coupled with the existence of a more developed and balanced risk appetite, will define the level of activity for the year ahead.  Q. You are currently President of Cork Chamber. How did this role come about and what does it mean to you?  The passing of both my parents in a short period of time gave me more perspective and a sense that maybe I should work to make more of a difference in society and business in a way that would complement my professional role with EY.  I was appointed Chair of Cork Chamber’s Economic and Enterprise Committee for two years in 2013. Then, in 2018, I joined the Board as Honorary Treasurer and became Vice-President in 2020. I was elected President and Chair of the Board of Cork Chamber in May 2022 for a term of two years.  It was a proud moment and I have fully embraced it and enjoy the role.   Being President of Cork Chamber allows me to play a more active business and political leadership role in the region. The chamber has over 1,200 members employing some 120,000 people. Being President gives me a significant platform to represent the business community in the city and county.  Top tips for M&A transactions Ireland remains a highly attractive location for investment and, looking to the year ahead, there is significant appetite to deploy capital as business owners continue to seek growth capital.  The technology sector continues to dominate the M&A landscape in Ireland in terms of transactions, partnerships and strategic alliances.  Other sectors of interest include engineering, financial services, business support services, healthcare, life sciences (both pharma and medtech) and ESG.  The green transition to a lower carbon economy is also driving investment decisions, and companies with sustainability credentials will continue to be attractive. For Irish companies undertaking a merger or exit, being well-prepared is essential for maximising the value of the transaction. Here are my top five tips: Understand key value drivers; this is essential to both preparation and execution; Have a clear growth story with understandable drivers that underpin financial projections to match specific investor criteria and strategic objectives; Align key management in preparation for a transaction process, while also ensuring the team has the bandwidth to focus on the day-to-day running of the business; Ensure the business/economic cycle supports your plan exit (e.g. historic company performance versus forecast performance and macroeconomic environment); Ensure compliance across all areas of the business (e.g. regulatory, environmental and sustainability). Addressing these areas well ahead of undertaking a potential M&A process will help reduce the risk of value erosion during a transaction.  Appointing advisors can also ease the transaction process and enhance value by allowing owners and managers to continue to focus on successful day-to-day operations. And to advisors, I would also say: take the time to listen carefully. It’s important to be humble and confident. There is no place for arrogance. 

From art to accountancy and audit to recruitment, Mark Baker has forged a multi-faceted career that speaks to the diversity and mobility of the profession today In his career as a financial recruiter, Mark Baker estimates he has met “thousands” of accountants. “Not one is the same as the next,” Baker says. “This clichéd idea that we are boring is just not true, but thankfully I think we’re seeing that cliché less and less these days.” Baker puts this shifting perception of accountants down to the rise of professional platforms such as LinkedIn – which has given people greater insight into the reality of the profession and how diverse it is. “Qualifying as a Chartered Accountant gives you such a strong career foundation. It opens up avenues and gives you a lot of different options,” he says. “You can go anywhere you want with it really because, if you are a Chartered Accountant, people know straight off the bat that you have a high level of competence in multiple areas – you need that to get the qualification in the first place.” As joint Managing Partner of Darwin Hawkins, the recruitment firm he established in 2018 with co-founder and fellow FCA Niall O’Kelly (ex-PwC), Baker has a bird’s eye view of emerging trends in the profession and what might lie ahead for the accountant of the future.   Range of career options Darwin Hawkins provides recruitment services to employers and candidates in the finance sector and has as its Chair investor James Caan, CBE, the British-Pakistani recruitment entrepreneur and former judge on the BBC series Dragons’ Den. “Every day, we’re talking to Chartered Accountants about their career options and the sheer range of choices open to them. You can go into a multitude of diverse areas such as data analytics, corporate finance or sustainability,” Baker says. “I’ve always viewed training contracts as apprenticeships. A lot of people train in audit for three-plus years and move directly into roles as financial accountants or financial analysts. “They can often even move into corporate finance on very good salaries straight after training in audit, but those two roles are actually very different. I think that really highlights the quality of the qualification and the mobility it gives you in terms of your career options right from the get-go.” Baker himself qualified as a Chartered Accountant with Deloitte in Dublin, training in audit, and went on to work in the banking sector with Certus, the specialist loan servicing group, before cutting his teeth in recruitment with FK International and partnering with Niall O’Kelly to launch Darwin Hawkins. His path to qualifying as a Chartered Accountant and finding his entrepreneurial niche in recruitment has not been a straightforward one, however, and, as Baker sees it, his story serves as a strong example of the diversity in the profession and varied career paths qualifying as a Chartered Accountant can support. “I really think young people need to hear our stories as Chartered Accountants; about what we do every day, the opportunities we have and how we got to where we are. That’s the best way we can show them what this profession has to offer,” he says.   Path to accounting Baker grew up in the south Dublin suburbs of Shankill and Sandyford, attending Cabinteely Community School, and went on to study Arts at University College Dublin (UCD). “When I was at primary school, all I can remember is that I wanted to play for Celtic FC and, as I got a bit older and wiser, I decided maybe I could be an artist. I was good at art, good at sports. My parents were always very supportive, so I grew up genuinely believing I could be anything I wanted to be,” he says. “I did quite well at school, but unfortunately like many people I know, I can’t say I had great career guidance at secondary school and I wasn’t sure what direction I wanted to go in.” While studying at UCD, Baker discovered his entrepreneurial flair, selling portrait paintings for impressive price tags in local art galleries and then online. “As a 20-year-old at college, in my spare time I was selling my paintings through galleries for €2,000 and €3,000. It was a simple business model – I put the work in and got paid for it in direct proportion. I was able to create something from nothing, go to market, and be financially rewarded. That entrepreneurial mindset was always there, and it was now being validated,” he says. “After college, I made the decision to go full-time doing that for a year to see how it would go – selling art through my website and the Green Gallery in Stephen’s Green Shopping Centre – famous faces, portraits, realism.” “I did reasonably well, but then the recession hit in 2008 and everything just fell off a cliff. Nobody wanted to spend money on paintings. My little bubble burst. I had to step back and ask myself, not just ‘What do I want to do?’ but also, ‘What’s a solid career?’ I didn’t want to be a starving artist.” To this day, Baker continues to paint in his own time and has been commissioned over the years to produce portraits of high-profile subjects, including Barack Obama, Stephen Spielberg and Dave Grohl, lead singer of the Foo Fighters. “I promised myself I would never give up on it and I haven’t. I still sell my paintings and hold exhibitions, but I knew when the recession hit that I also needed security. I liked the open-ended nature of accountancy. When you become an accountant, you can essentially go into any kind of business, and even start your own. That appealed to me,” he says.   Professional diploma in accounting Baker went on to complete the Professional Diploma in Accounting at DCU Business School, a conversion course designed for non-business graduates who want to work in accounting. After graduating, he joined Deloitte as a trainee and qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 2011. “I found Deloitte very supportive. They give you everything you need. The people are the best thing about it, particularly at your own level. You have a support group when you are doing your exams and training contract,” he says. “Without the support of those around me, and the opportunity to ask questions when I needed to, I think I would have struggled. I learned a lot. I learned what professionalism is. I learned what a high standard of performance is – the best in the business. For me, the Chartered Accountants Ireland professional training programme is the peak, the pinnacle. I learned a million little things through my training contract that still stand to me today.” Now, as a recruiter and co-founder of his own firm, Baker is intent on using his experience in life and work to provide candidates and employers with a personal, tailored recruitment experience. “With Darwin Hawkins, Niall and I backed ourselves and each other. We took a risk starting a recruitment business, but it’s also delivered the biggest reward. I believe that people need to take more risks,” he says. “We’re different from many of the other recruiters I’ve come across in our field. We’re a team of qualified accountants. Having met thousands of accountants, I know more now about every facet of accounting and every possible career path, than I ever would doing the one role. “Accountants are very nuanced due to the wide-ranging career paths open to them. Every accountant we meet has a different story, different skillsets, and will have different opportunities. We try to help people realise and seize these opportunities”.   Future of the profession As for the future of the profession? The basics will always matter, Baker says. “Employers will always want to know that candidates have the basics of accounting mastered. Interpersonal skills will always be a major selling point, but I think now with the emergence of different technologies, adaptability is also very important,” he says. “Employers want to know that you will be willing and able to get stuck into tasks and projects that are outside the day-to-day – a systems implementation project, for example, or something that’s heavy on data analytics”. “Knowledge and experience in big data and Power BI data visualisation tools are increasingly important along with a good understanding of systems implementation and process improvement”. “Because technology is evolving so much, these systems have to be implemented and finance teams are heavily involved because they are the ones who are going to be using them. When you get involved, you become an integral part of the business”. “Artificial intelligence is another obvious one. There are multiple AI tools already being used in finance, but you still need the people with the ideas and knowledge to train these systems with the correct prompts, and to ensure that ethical standards are being maintained. “I believe that there will always be a need for accounting talent, no matter what technology brings and how it might change the way we work.”

By championing diversity, equity and inclusion, businesses have  the power to become agents of positive change in an uncertain time, write John McNamara and Conor Hudson Threats to the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) agenda are only growing stronger. It is important to understand the context, but more importantly to remind ourselves of the gaps DEI seeks to close and – as members – strive to engage and communicate on these issues more effectively. This year will be the biggest election year in history. More than 60 countries representing half the world’s population – four billion people – will go to the polls voting in presidential, government and local elections. This is also perhaps the biggest test yet for democracy as we continue to see certain extreme views previously confined to the fringes of society migrate to the mainstream. Most recently, this shift has included an anti-DEI movement that is now, perhaps unsurprisingly, featuring in the discourse surrounding the US presidential election due to take place later this year. At its core, anti-diversity activism views affirmative action as being racist and DEI initiatives and targets as being discriminatory. In the US, for example, there is currently a push from certain quarters to reduce funding for inclusion programmes in schools and universities. DEI resourcing levels are under scrutiny and there is also the ongoing weaponisation of transgender issues directly impacting the LGBTQ+ community. So how should we react to this assault, particularly given the likelihood that it will continue to grow and spread? Perhaps the answer lies in returning to the ‘first principles’ of the DEI business case whilst recognising the need to work harder communicating, explaining and persuading on the arguments that support DEI.  In particular, we need to ask ourselves: What role can we play as members in business and practice? Force for good Business can be a force for good and many business people are regarded with trust and respect. Businesses can therefore play a pivotal role in promoting DEI and serving as catalysts for wider societal change.  Embracing diversity within their workforce can foster innovation and creativity in companies, bringing together individuals with unique perspectives and experiences.  Inclusive hiring practices and equal opportunities not only give businesses access to a wider talent pool but also empower marginalised groups, helping to reduce social inequalities.  Moreover, businesses with inclusive policies tend to better understand and serve diverse consumer markets, increasing the likelihood of better financial performance.  Companies can enhance their reputation by prioritising DEI initiatives, creating a positive culture and potentially attracting top talent.  Doing so effectively is, however, about much more than simply adopting the signifiers of inclusivity (celebrating International Women’s Day or Pride, for example). It needs to be backed up by inclusive policies that are truly respected, accepted and enforced from the top down and right across the organisation. By championing DEI, businesses can become agents of positive change, influencing broader societal attitudes and norms. These businesses can, in turn, expect to benefit from an enhanced public image and perception of their brand, which can improve their reputation and lead to greater trust. So how can Chartered Accountants in leading business roles put us back on the right track? To navigate the path to DEI and move beyond the anti-DEI movement, members and business leaders must be aware that individuals in their organisations will be at different points in their personal journey. They should also consider the following steps when implementing their strategy: • Offering a safe space for those with diverse perspectives so that they can ask questions and their concerns can be understood and addressed with empathy. Don’t allow DEI to become a “Them” and “Us” scenario. • Communicate transparently about DEI initiatives, identifying the gaps in the organisation and how DEI policies can close them. Ensure that the initiatives have a strategy focusing on inclusion. Otherwise, they can be counterproductive. • Implement fair and objective metrics for evaluating progress in reaching DEI goals; this helps build credibility and legitimacy, but avoid these KPIs becoming a box-ticking exercise.  • Understand the experience of colleagues from diverse backgrounds in your organisation. Setting and reaching DEI goals related solely to the recruitment process cannot embed and maintain the culture needed to retain these new hires. • Collaborate with external experts or organisations in the DEI space who can provide the necessary insight, guidance and credibility to support a successful DEI journey.  Inclusion as a skill In the face of the anti-DEI movement, the skill of inclusion becomes a crucial asset. Treating inclusion as a skill involves actively fostering environments where diverse perspectives are not only welcomed but also valued.  This skill requires empathy, open-mindedness and effective communication to bridge divides and dispel misconceptions that fuel opposition to DEI efforts.  Organisations can help develop these skills through unconscious bias training, promoting employee resource groups (e.g. LGBTQ+) and actively seeking diverse perspectives in the decision making process. Inclusion as a skill empowers individuals to navigate conversations with those resistant to DEI, fostering understanding and promoting unity.  By emphasising the benefits of diversity and creating spaces where everyone feels heard and respected, individuals equipped with inclusion as a skill can play a pivotal role in countering anti-DEI sentiment. John McNamara is Chair of BALANCE,  the Institute’s LGBTQ+ allies network group and Executive Director and CFO at AIB life. Conor Hudson is a Finance Director and member of BALANCE.  

The implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive will introduce new challenges in business reporting, not least the tricky concept of double materiality, writes Mike O’Halloran In 2024, a new era of corporate reporting has kicked off. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) began to apply to some of the largest entities in Ireland for financial periods commencing on or after 1 January 2024.   The cohort of entities applying the CSRD will increase significantly in the years ahead as the numbers in scope rise in 2025, 2026 and 2028.  Under the European Green Deal, the European Commission aims to transform the EU into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy with no net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050, economic growth decoupled from resource use and no person or place left behind.  In seeking to achieve this goal as part of the deal, the CSRD will not be without its implementation challenges. One of the challenges that preparers will have to navigate is double materiality. The CSRD requires the assessment of the materiality of impacts, risks and opportunities relating to sustainability matters via a double materiality assessment. This will be new to most preparers of sustainability statements and those providing assurance on the information.  Double materiality is a unique concept of reporting under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).  It is the most notable difference between these standards and the International Sustainability Standards Board’s standards (IFRS S1 and IFRS S2), which will be adopted in other jurisdictions outside Europe. This will most likely include the UK where the Department for Business and Trade has indicated that it may be endorsed in 2024 as part of its Sustainability Disclosure Standards. Materiality – two perspectives As the name might suggest, a double materiality assessment is performed from two perspectives – financial and impact. The result forms the basis for what should be disclosed in a sustainability statement.  The use of two perspectives differs significantly from the “traditional” materiality assessments accountants will be familiar with. This is because a double materiality assessment focuses not just on matters that are financially relevant, but also on those that impact stakeholders, both internal and external, and the environment.  Without a double materiality assessment, an entity could simply focus on sustainability matters that are financially relevant to itself and ignore what is important to the wider society it affects. A double materiality assessment involves consideration of the entity’s direct and indirect impact. This means that it covers the entity’s own operations as well as its upstream (e.g. suppliers and pre-production activities) and downstream (e.g. post-production activities and end customers) value chain, when considering its material impacts, risks and opportunities.  The output from a double materiality assessment identifies impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability matters that are considered to be material for the entity, its stakeholders and the environment, and therefore must be reported on in its sustainability statement. Financial materiality For a sustainability matter to be material from a financial perspective, it must trigger (or must reasonably be expected to trigger) material financial effects on the undertaking. In assessing this, an entity must consider whether sustainability matters generate risks or opportunities that materially influence its development, financial position, financial performance, cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short-, medium- or long-term. The materiality of risks and opportunities should be assessed based on a combination of the likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of financial effects. Impact materiality Impact materiality looks at how an entity may have an impact on its stakeholders from an environmental, social and governance (ESG) point of view. For a matter to be material from an impact perspective, it must generate (or have the potential to generate) positive or negative impacts on people or the environment. The relevant person affected is the stakeholder and impact materiality is viewed through the eyes of the stakeholder to identify sustainability impacts. When an entity is considering impact materiality, then, it must consider actual or potential impacts, positive and negative impacts and impacts covering the short-, medium- or long-term. The assessment of the severity of its impacts, and therefore whether they are material, is based on three factors: • Scale – how grave or beneficial the impact is; • Scope – how widespread the impact is; and • Irremediability – whether or not the impact can be mitigated or resolved. Furthermore, if an entity is addressing potential impacts, it is required to consider the likelihood that the issue will occur. Engagement with stakeholders is a key consideration when reviewing impact materiality and it will help to inform the entity about its material sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities.  The ESRS do not set out how an entity should engage with its stakeholders and the engagement process should be determined by the reporting entity.  Some of the stakeholder categories an entity may consider as part of its materiality assessment include employees, suppliers, customers, consumers, end users, regulators, local communities and nature. Double materiality sets the reporting boundary When an entity determines that impacts, risks and opportunities related to a sustainability matter are material because of a double materiality assessment, then it is required to disclose information required by the disclosure requirements related to that sustainability matter in the corresponding topical and sector-specific ESRS.  In addition, it is required to disclose any additional entity-specific information when an ESRS does not sufficiently cover this matter. As a result, a double materiality assessment sets the entity’s sustainability reporting boundary. If a matter is material from a financial perspective, an impact perspective or both, then it must be disclosed in a sustainability statement.  The challenges There are several challenges that entities performing a double materiality assessment may struggle with, particularly in the initial years of implementation. These include: Understanding and applying the concept While preparers will already be familiar with materiality, double materiality introduces some new parameters they will need time to become comfortable with. The ESRS do not specify a process to follow when carrying out a double materiality assessment. The reason for this is that no one process would meet the requirements of all the entities reporting under the standards. Therefore, an entity that performs a materiality assessment must design and apply a process tailored to its circumstances, while remaining within the requirements set out in ESRS 1. While such an approach allows entities to tailor their processes accordingly, the lack of a rules-based system may prove difficult for some entities to adapt to, particularly in the earlier years as practices and precedent are being established. In the absence of a strict rules-based approach, entities will need supplementary material to guide their methodologies. Currently the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group is drafting implementation guidelines to assist with this. The assurance requirement A key requirement of the CSRD is external assurance on an entity’s sustainability statement. This will initially require limited assurance before being upgraded to reasonable assurance at some point in the future. While assurance will help to ensure that the integrity and reliability of sustainability information reported on will be enhanced, it will also bring with it a level of complexity whereby the judgements made by preparers will be assessed by assurance providers. This may introduce differing opinions on what should be deemed as material from an impact or financial perspective. All eyes on the first reporters The number of reporters in the first wave of CSRD adopters in Ireland will be low in number but high in terms of market capitalisation.  All eyes will be on the sustainability statements prepared by these entities in early 2025 as users, preparers and other interested parties will be keen to see how they have approached double materiality.  Despite the low number of reporters for 2024 year-ends, many entities will be indirectly impacted as they will be part of the supply chain of reporters. They will therefore be providing information to entities preparing their sustainability statement.  Furthermore, many entities that will be subject to the requirements of the CSRD in future years will be keen to learn from the challenges encountered by the first adopters. Despite the onerous requirements of the new suite of standards and in particular double materiality, it is important for entities and their stakeholders to remember the reasons for their introduction and the underlying cause they seek to remedy.  The EU’s goals under the European Green Deal are ambitious, but they need the full support and backing of businesses to be successful. Mike O’Halloran is Technical Manager in the Advocacy and Voice Department of Chartered Accountants Ireland Double materiality: brewery example Consider an entity operating a brewery in Ireland. In carrying out a double materiality assessment it may, among other things, consider the following matters to be material, from one or both perspectives: Energy (financial perspective) – due to the energy intensiveness of the production process and the financial risk of increased energy prices; Pollution of water (impact perspective) – due to the large amount of water discharged during the production process and the impact that this may have on water quality locally; Water consumption (financial perspective) – due to the cost involved and the availability of sufficiently clean water; Land-use change as a direct impact driver of biodiversity loss (impact perspective) – due to the large amount of malt, barley and other crops used in the production process; Sustainability matters under the heading of “own workforce” including health and safety of employees (impact perspective) – due to the large workforce an entity has employed in its factory; Resource inflows and outflows (impact and financial perspectives) – given the amount and cost of packaging and storage materials used, particularly in an entity’s downstream activities; Personal safety of consumers and end users (impact and financial perspectives) – given the health implications of a breach of food safety regulations on consumers as well as the financial implications that it would bring; and Responsible marketing practices (impact perspective) – given the addictive and age-restricted nature of the product being produced by the brewery. This example is for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be a complete list, nor a list of the matters that are mandatorily material for a similar entity. Individual judgment must be applied in each instance.

The foundations for a common polity are eroding as increasingly polarised views and influences continue to flourish, writes Cormac Lucey It looks like voters in the United States will have to decide between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in November’s presidential election. It is symptomatic of how polarised American politics have become that the strongest argument for voting for Joe Biden is that he isn’t Donald Trump and vice versa.  Why have politics in the developed world become so opposite? And what is the likely future direction of travel? In my opinion, several secular factors are eroding the political centre and promoting the rise in political extremes.  Narrowcasting has replaced broadcasting. In the past, TV and radio channels were limited in number and had to cater for a large audience. The result was broadcasting that was jointly watched or listened to by large sections of the community. Today, it is viable to create media and social media offerings that cater for very narrow and specialised audiences. Broadcasting has been replaced by narrowcasting. Sectional views are being promoted. A common, integrated view is being relegated. Social media algorithms seek to maximise their audiences even if it means promoting a one-sided view of what’s happening. Just look at the US where the difference in political perspectives offered by Fox News and MSNBC is such that, even when covering the same story, they often appear to be reporting on different events. The commercial imperative to maximise audiences means that people are increasingly being told what they want to hear resulting in an echo chamber effect where contrary views are downplayed or ignored. Division is promoted – unity is structurally disadvantaged. The growth of technology has turbo-charged the division of labour. The essence of the Industrial Revolution is that people ceased to be farmers and moved off the land to earn their living by doing increasingly specialised tasks. While specialisation has promoted greater efficiencies and higher economic growth, it has come with the cost that we now have a reduced understanding of what others do and of how the entire system hangs together.  Society has become more politically polarised around socio-economic differences. In his book The Road to Somewhere, David Goodhart explained the shock of the Brexit and Trump 2016 votes. He described a UK society that was divided between “Somewheres” and “Anywheres”.  “Somewheres” are firmly rooted in a specific community and Goodhart reckons that this group constitute about half of the UK population. “Anywheres” are typically socially liberal, well-educated and generally living in cities – they could live and work anywhere (as the pandemic illustrated).  Goodhart reckons that they comprise just 20 to 25 percent of the population but dominate politics and the media. “Inbetweeners” oscillate between these two groups. Brexit and Trump represented a shock victory for the “Somewheres” over the “Anywheres”. Recent protests in Ireland against immigration by asylum seekers are probably being carried out by “Somewheres,” angry at the immigration policies of Dublin’s “Anywhere” political establishment.   In the future, the challenge will be that each of the drivers of political fragmentation listed above seem likely to continue to grow. If the foundations for a common polity are eroding, reaching political agreement is likely to be increasingly difficult in the future.   *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the February/March 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor. Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland