Andrea Dermody explains how organisations can develop a culture of belonging where employees can thrive Do you remember a time when you weren’t picked for a team? Or a time when you felt like the ‘other’, the ‘only’, in a group? Do you remember how that felt? These feelings relate to your sense of belonging, your fundamental human need for connection and affinity with others. Over the last few years, we have seen the narrative around diversity and inclusion expand to include equity and belonging, ‘DEIB’ for short. But what does the ‘belonging’ element mean? The dictionary defines belonging as “a feeling of being happy or comfortable as part of a particular group and having a good relationship with the other members of the group because they welcome you and accept you”. According to research by Coqual, a non-profit think tank, a sense of belonging at work is rooted in four elements: Being seen for your unique contributions; Feeling connected to your co-workers; Being supported in your daily work and career development; and Being proud of your organisation’s values and purpose. The research found that employees with high belonging scores also have high engagement scores, higher retention scores, greater loyalty to their organisation and are more likely to recommend their company as a good place to work. When individuals feel a genuine connection to their organisation and their colleagues, they are more likely to contribute their unique skills, ideas and perspectives. This is critically important as 72 percent of European employees report feeling disengaged from their workplace. Might a culture of belonging address this challenge? Creating a culture of belonging How do we build belonging? Belonging is in the little things and, according to Geoffrey L. Cohen in Belonging – The Science of Creating Connection and Bridging Divides, “slight adjustments in the way we interact with people in our daily lives can do much to nurture belonging”. Here are some of the strategies that work: Lead from the top by acknowledging that the objective of the organisation is to create a culture where DEIB is part of how you do business every day and tying its achievement to reward and the promotion of leaders. Spotlight diverse role models to overcome the challenge described by Amy Edmondson in The Fearless Organisation as “when no one at the top of the organisation looks like you, it can make it harder for you to feel you belong”. Be respectfully curious. Don’t assume that what gives you a sense of belonging is the same for everyone. Ask questions and actively listen to learn who people are and what makes them feel they belong. Develop your leaders to understand the difference between diversity, inclusion, equity and belonging and their role as culture shapers and carriers. Build psychological safety by promoting a culture where everyone feels comfortable speaking up, taking risks and celebrating the learning acquired from mistakes. Belonging does not exist in isolation from the other components of DEIB. Organisations need to take a balanced score card approach to build capability, accountability and action across all four areas, regardless of how they label this work. When employees feel they belong, they are more likely to thrive and contribute their best work. Organisations that get this right will reap the benefits of a diverse, engaged and high-performing workforce. Andrea Dermody is the founder of D&I advisory consultancy Dermody  

Leaving work to go on holiday can be stressful. Moira Dunne outlines how to prepare effectively so you can really enjoy your break The week before we go on holiday is often the busiest of the year. We become super-productive as we crack through our ‘To Do’ list to clear tasks before we leave. The hard deadline of that final day provides a sharp focus. This helps us stay on track and avoid the usual distractions. I bet you don’t take an extended coffee break on the afternoon before your holiday! Here are three key tips to optimise your last week at work before your holiday. 1. Prioritise, prioritise, prioritise Most people I know have more work to do than they have time to do it. It is important to prioritise every week, but particularly the week before you finish up. Consider the work you have to do and decide: What is important (high priority) and what is nice to have (low priority)? What needs to be done this week, and what can be pushed out? What can be handed over to someone else? The looming deadline of a holiday helps us act more assertively. We can’t say yes to everything as we won’t be at the desk to complete it. So, we negotiate priorities and deadlines because we have no choice. 2. Capture everything In the final days before your holiday, you will be really on top of your workload. Capture everything now so that you get the benefit when you return. Update all your project plans and task lists. This frees your brain to help you switch off quickly. It also helps you get back up to speed when you return refreshed and relaxed from your holiday. 3. Plan the first week back Capitalise on that high-focus period before your break by planning your first days back in the office before you finish up. You may want to ease back into work with a low-key schedule or hit the ground running with some key meetings. Either way, planning ahead will help you switch off during your time off, so you can really rest and recharge. Moira Dunne is a Productivity Consultant and founder of beproductive.ie  

Jean Evans explores how the language women use at work can adversely affect their career prospects and how they can change it The way women use language can sometimes be perceived as undermining their confidence. It’s something women have been conditioned to do and it’s a part of how they communicate. No matter how expert, qualified or senior a woman is in the workplace, the consequences are the same. They are often unaware of the negative impact using self-defeating language can have on their career progression and professional life. Confidence and how women (and men) are perceived is often subliminal and imperceptible. Confident people get promotions, access to projects, support, financing and so much more. So, what happens when a woman is not confident at work? What happens when she undermines herself consistently without even realising it? What happens when her choice of words expresses a lack of self-belief or imposter complex? The result is that she may be turned down for a new job, passed over for a promotion, not given access to projects, or financial support ... the list goes on. Several factors can contribute to this perception: Hedging: Women tend to use more hedging language or qualifiers in their speech, such as “I think”, “maybe” or “sort of” to soften their statements or appear less assertive. This can create an impression of uncertainty or lack of confidence along with a need for validation from others. Apologising: Women often apologise more frequently than men, even when it may not be necessary. Apologising unnecessarily can give the impression that a woman lacks confidence in her opinions or actions. Politeness: Women are often socialised to be more polite and accommodating in their speech. While politeness is generally valued, it can sometimes be perceived as a lack of assertiveness or confidence. Upward inflection: Women sometimes use upward inflection, or ‘uptalk’, at the end of their sentences, making statements sound like questions. This can make them seem as if they are doubting themselves and seeking outward validation. Minimising achievements: Women often downplay their accomplishments or use self-deprecating humour to avoid appearing boastful. While this may be a way to navigate social norms, it can also inadvertently undermine their perceived confidence in their achievements. Minimising the intrusion: This often shows up as “I’m just ...” The word ‘just’ is heavily tied to point 2 in this list – apologising for intruding on someone by email, phone, etc. It’s important to note that these linguistic behaviours are not inherently indicative of a lack of confidence. No matter how expert she may be in her field, any woman may still fall into these linguistics patterns. They can be influenced by societal expectations and unconscious bias. But the fact is that every time this undermining language is used, women lose out. What’s the antidote? Firstly, it’s about women becoming aware of how they speak and write. My advice is that, if you can engage a coach or have a trusted bestie, mention this to them and ask them to highlight any linguistic tendencies that may not be serving you. After a few goes, you will become aware of when you’re doing it and then you can start redefining your speaking habits to back up just how confident and able you actually are. I had a coaching client recently who used the word ‘just’ a lot. I asked her to reread her emails before sending them and to catch herself whenever this word popped up. She texted me back the very next day to say her confidence had shot up exponentially because of this seemingly minor change. She hadn’t even noticed until then how she had been apologising for almost everything! And that was her first step towards a really positive change. Jean Evans is Networking Architect at NetworkMe

Tim Bicknell explores how to unlock the potential of innovation as a positive force for business growth Innovation, that elusive force propelling organisations forward, has become the ultimate strategic imperative in our fast-moving and sometimes chaotic business landscape. But what does it take to forge a culture of innovation? The answer lies, not just in visionary leadership and cutting-edge technology, but also in the delicate and skilled work of transforming teams and businesses into hotbeds of creative brilliance. 1. Leadership as catalyst Leadership commitment is the bedrock upon which a culture of innovation is built. Those at the top of the organisation must prioritise and actively support innovation initiatives, signalling to all the value placed on creativity and smart risk-taking. They must build an environment in which experimentation is encouraged, providing resources and dedicated time for visionary pursuits. Through personal example and unwavering support, leaders can pave the way for a culture that embraces, nourishes and rewards innovative thinking. 2. Rewarding the brave: A culture of risk-taking At the heart of innovation lies the spirit of audacious risk-taking. Organisations must, not only encourage, but also reward those who dare to dream big and venture into uncharted territory. Empowering employees to propose daring ideas, while embracing failure as a stepping-stone to success, creates an environment in which considered risk-taking can thrive. By recognising and incentivising risk-takers, regardless of the outcome, organisations send a clear message that innovative thinking is both cherished and actively encouraged. 3. Fostering cross-functional collaboration Innovation flourishes where cross-functional collaboration is supported. Organisations must shatter the silos that breed stagnation and nurture an environment in which diverse perspectives converge, birthing a breeding ground for creativity and ground-breaking solutions. By creating platforms that encourage individuals from various backgrounds to collaborate, exchange ideas and harness collective expertise, organisations can tap into a wellspring of knowledge and insight, fuelling the innovation process. 4. A learning mindset for continuous growth A culture of innovation thrives on the relentless pursuit of knowledge and growth. Organisations must provide pathways for employees to enhance skills, acquire new knowledge and stay attuned to emerging trends and technologies. Through immersive training programmes, workshops and mentorship, organisations not only arm individuals with the tools for innovation, but also showcase their commitment to personal and professional development. By nurturing a culture of lifelong learning, organisations unleash the creative spirit of their teams, enabling them to adapt and thrive in the face of an ever-changing market landscape. 5. Nurturing a culture of open communication Effective communication and a continuing, open exchange of ideas can support a culture of innovation. Organisations need to construct channels and platforms that foster a seamless flow of ideas across all levels. Regular brainstorming sessions, idea-sharing platforms and innovation forums become the lifeblood of a culture that thrives on open dialogue. Leaders must be seen to be receptive – actively listening to employee suggestions and providing constructive feedback. It is through this culture of open communication and inclusivity that organisations can unlock the creative potential within their teams. 6. Unleashing the power of diversity and inclusion Diversity and inclusion form the bedrock upon which innovation stands tall. Teams comprised of individuals with different skill sets and expertise challenge conventional thinking, leading to fresh ideas and ground-breaking solutions. Organisations must actively seek diversity and foster an inclusive environment in which all voices can be heard and valued. By embracing diverse perspectives, experiences and backgrounds, organisations can effectively foster a culture of innovative brilliance. Cultivating a culture of innovation within a team and business requires a multifaceted approach. Organisations unlock the potential for creative breakthroughs by: prioritising visionary leadership; embracing risk-taking; fostering collaboration and open communication; promoting continuous learning; and nurturing diversity. When these critical success factors are woven into the DNA of an organisation, innovation becomes a driving force, propelling their teams and business towards sustainable growth and success. Tim Bicknell is Managing Director of Deep Cove

Employers seeking qualified accountants should consider recruiting from outside the EEA through the Critical Skills Employment Permit, writes Emma Richmond With Ireland now at close to full employment, employers are increasingly facing challenges in recruiting suitably qualified staff to meet their needs. One area in which this challenge is becoming acute is in accountancy and finance.  However, it doesn’t have to be that hard! One solution to tackle this is to broaden the recruitment pool by availing of a work permit to bring in a non-EEA worker to meet the requirement. In recent times, there has been an increase in work permit applications from accountancy firms and, particularly those relating to suitably qualified audit staff. Figures published by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment show that, so far this year, almost 700 work permits have been issued in the finance sector. Through the Critical Skills Work Permit, Irish government policy has strategically targeted the sectors most in need.  The Government is using this permit to attract highly skilled people into the labour market where there are identifiable skills shortages, and with the aim of the holders taking up permanent residence in the State.  The list of roles designated for a Critical Skills Work Permit is updated on a biannual basis following consultation with stakeholders with the aim of ensuring that the permit system is meeting the demands of the market at any given time. The Critical Skills Employment Permit is the ‘golden ticket’ of work permits. It is available to individuals for a role with a minimum salary of €64,000 or where the role is listed on the Critical Skills Employment List and there is a minimum salary of €32,000.  The advantage of this permit is that it offers a spousal permit to any spouse of the holder of the work permit. From the time of their arrival in Ireland, the holder will also begin gaining residency recognition for a future citizenship application. These elements make this type of permit very valuable and attractive to non-EEA nationals looking to relocate to Ireland on a permanent basis. The more common work permit applications processed for accountancy firms relate to the following roles:  qualified accountants with at least three years’ auditing experience; chartered and certified accountants and those specialising in regulation, solvency or financial management; and taxation experts specialising in tax compliance. These roles are all listed on the Critical Skills Employment List and, as such, these permits are granted with relative ease once all the necessary proofs and details have been provided in the application. The current processing time is two to three weeks from the date of application.  It is worth noting that, depending on nationality, prospective employees may still need to apply for a visa if they are coming from a visa-required country, and this should be factored into the lead time when recruiting by this means. The Critical Skills Work Permit provides a fast and effective way of bridging the gap between the demand for suitably qualified accountancy staff and the supply.  Emma Richmond is a Partner with Whitney Moore

Three new reporting requirements are pushing nature and biodiversity up the ESG agenda. Orla Delargy explains why Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) topics are currently top of mind in business and finance. Climate change has dominated under the ‘E’ of ESG, but nature and biodiversity are catching up. Three developments have helped drive the momentum: the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the new Global Biodiversity Framework. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures    The latest Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) status report found that over 3,800 organisations support the TCFD and are working towards TCFD-aligned reporting. The question is whether the newer Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) will follow the same path, and whether nature-related disclosures will become mandatory in certain jurisdictions.  Like the TCFD framework, the TNFD proposes disclosures across four pillars: Governance – the organisation’s governance around nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities; Strategy – the actual and potential impacts of nature-related risks and opportunities for the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning where such information is material; Risk & impact management – how the organisation identifies, assesses and manages nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities; and Metrics & targets – the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities where such information is material. Relatively few organisations have started incorporating biodiversity into their broader ESG governance and strategy. However, over 200 organisations are piloting the TNFD guidance and there is a public consultation currently open, with the first full version of the framework expected in September 2023.  Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive  Where the TNFD is a global, voluntary framework, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is EU-specific and mandatory. The CSRD significantly expands the existing rules on non-financial reporting, with close to 50,000 companies across Europe likely to be affected in the coming years.  The CSRD disclosure requirements on biodiversity go much further than the previous reporting directive, requesting information on biodiversity metrics, policies and targets. Again, organisations are asked to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities that relate to biodiversity, and the TNFD is explicitly referenced.  Crucially, organisations are asked to disclose whether they have a transition plan in line with the new Global Biodiversity Framework, agreed during the UN conference in Montreal in December 2022. Global Biodiversity Framework  The overarching vision of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is no net loss of biodiversity by 2030, net gain from 2030 and full recovery by 2050. The GBF sets out a plan for the next decade, with four long-term goals and 23 targets, spanning a wide range of topics including spatial planning, nature restoration, invasive alien species, agriculture and climate change. Although almost all the targets are relevant to the private sector, Target 15 stands out. It asks countries to take measures to ensure that organisations assess and disclose their risks, dependencies and impacts on biodiversity. The question is how national governments will interpret this and what measures they will take.  How organisations can use the frameworks Organisations will be encouraged to see the degree of alignment and overlap between emerging frameworks such as the TNFD, CSRD and GBF. The challenge is to get familiar with these frameworks and, crucially, get started now.  As many of the frameworks discussed above are still in development, it is tempting to adopt a ‘wait-and-see’ approach. However, organisations can progress training and capacity building now. This is a new topic for many people but getting informed is the prerequisite for taking the right actions. Orla Delargy is an Associate Director with KPMG

As cyber security comes increasingly under threat, Michael Rooney outlines how businesses can deal with a cyber attack  Accountancy firms are a rich target for hackers because of the types of documents they handle. Beyond the normal personally identifiable information (PII) that they store for clients and employees, accountancy firms also deal with sensitive information on financial transactions, payroll and business affairs. Without a good cyber security strategy, businesses affected by an attack can incur serious costs, including remediation of the security breach, reputation damage and data privacy compliance penalties.  The steps you take after a breach can either increase or reduce the impact. Not having a cyber security response plan can lead to you paying much higher costs due to a delayed reaction. In its Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022, IBM estimated the average global cost of these incidents at €4.43 million. But organisations with a tested incident response plan can reduce that by €2.71 million, a saving of 39 percent. Here are seven steps accountancy firms should take immediately following the discovery of a data breach, ransomware incident or another attack to minimise its impact. 1. Disconnect infected devices from your network Many types of malware are designed to spread throughout a network as fast as possible. This is especially true for ransomware, which locks users out of their files using encryption.  As soon as you discover that a breach has occurred, disconnect the infected device(s) from your network. This includes disconnecting the device from Wi-Fi and any hardwired ethernet connections. You shouldn’t necessarily shut off the device’s power until you’ve spoken to an IT professional. But you should isolate it from other systems, including any syncing cloud services. 2. Have a professional assess the damage Don’t try to deal with a cyber breach yourself or download a free virus scanning tool (it could actually be a malware trap). Instead, once your machine has been isolated, get a trusted IT provider to assess the damage and provide guidance.  3. Remediate the infection  Once the breach is assessed, your IT security expert will begin remediating the breach. This will secure your network so your client files or sensitive business information isn’t stolen while you’re dealing with the fallout.  4. Determine whether client data was breached Find out what type of data was compromised e.g. client database, sensitive cloud documents. It is important to determine the extent of the breach so you can notify impacted third parties (such as your clients) whose data might have been exposed. 5. Contact accountancy enforcement and the police Report the incident to accountancy enforcement and the police. This has several benefits: You have a record of the incident for any potential insurance claims. Accountancy enforcement can track the breach, which may connect to others that have been reported. Your police report can be referred to in data privacy compliance reports and this shows responsibility on the part of your organisation. 6. Carry out a notification plan according to data privacy requirements Review the data privacy regulations that your office is subject to, such as General Data Protection Regulation, and notify third parties in accordance with these guidelines. If notification isn’t made in a timely manner, it can lead to penalties, as well as a significant loss of trust in your business. 7. Improve defences to stop future breaches Reinforce your defences by having a cyber security assessment performed. This can help an IT provider pinpoint specific weaknesses in your network that need to be fortified to ensure this type of attack doesn’t happen again. Michael Rooney is Managing Director of FutureRange   

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions I am terrified of making a mistake or being seen as stupid. So, I work very long hours, perfecting my tasks, rarely speaking at meetings and avoid taking any kind of risk. How can I feel confident about what I am doing? When clients tell me about a fear they have, such as making a mistake, I ask them when was the last time they made a mistake. Most clients can’t come up with any evidence at all to support their fear.   In fact, they mostly have evidence to contradict their fear, such as praise from organisational leadership.   Isn’t it interesting that our thoughts trump our lived experiences?   To overcome your fears, write down the evidence you have proving it’s legitimate as well as evidence that contradicts your fear.   What does looking at those lists change?  Here’s a mnemonic I love: FEAR – False Evidence Appearing Real.  The ‘false evidence’ is your thoughts and the ‘appearing real’ is the impact of those thoughts on your emotions, physical experience and behaviour.   It is often worth bringing issues of self-esteem and confidence to a therapist. It could be worthwhile to enquire about access to your organisation’s Employee Assistance Programme.   I contribute a lot at meetings but don’t make an impact.  I love my job; I am always well prepared and I’m a confident speaker – but I don’t seem to get my point across. Whether making a formal presentation or speaking at a meeting, I often advise clients that every word should work for its place.   When we know a lot about a subject, there can be a tendency to want to over-share that information – more than the audience needs – especially at a presentation.  In addition, extraverted types (who make sense of things by talking about them) often use 10 words where one would do, then they add another example, which reminds them of something that happened… You get the picture.   Whenever you have an important presentation, rehearse what you want to say out loud. It takes real discipline to pare your points back to the core and trust that you have said enough.   It’s important to hold onto this learned discipline at the Q&A by giving short answers. People can always ask for more information if they want it (whereas it is hard to say “that’s enough, thank you”). At meetings, I suggest that people preface what they want to say with a line such as, “I have three (two or one) main points” and then number the points as you make them.  This puts structure on what you want to say and helps you to be brief.   Make sure to reflect on your audience – how interested in the subject are they? How much do they already know? What is the objective of your presentation?  What part of your contribution are they more or less interested in? Tailor your answer to their needs.  Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant at Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie. 

As a hub for US tech firms, Ireland’s security is vulnerable but the Government is not yet prepared to think about ending Ireland’s neutrality despite the war in Ukraine, writes Judy Dempsey I was recently invited to meet a group of Irish TDs from across the political spectrum. There was a lot on the agenda, but Irish neutrality did not make the cut.  Some TDs said Russia’s war in Ukraine was not the right time to discuss the future of Ireland’s neutral stance. Others said the issue was taboo. For a democratic country anchored in the EU, which itself is becoming a defensive player because of the war in Ukraine, Irish neutrality is still a highly emotional and ideological issue.  Even though successive Irish governments have cherished this status over the years, they have not been prepared to pay for it. Only now is the defence budget being increased, having already been decimated.  Only now is the Government looking at the role of the Russian embassy in Dublin, whose diplomats know full well the strategic importance of Ireland.  Ireland is a hub for American IT, software and cyber security companies. It is an underwater gateway for cables packed with data that pass back and forth in the depths of the Atlantic Ocean.  What a treasure trove for intelligence officers. In short, Ireland’s security is vulnerable.  This is where security and neutrality come into play. The Irish Government and the public are not yet prepared to think about ending our neutrality despite the war that is being waged in Europe.  But look at Finland and Sweden – staunch defenders of their own neutrality. The Russian invasion of Ukraine persuaded them to join NATO because their neutrality, despite spending much on defence, was not enough to make them feel secure. Ireland may not have a sense of insecurity regardless of cyber-attacks on its health service and its geostrategic position as an IT hub, but here is a hypothetical question:  If Ireland were a member of NATO, would it support Ukraine being offered NATO membership when the US-led alliance meets on 11 and 12 July in the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius?  Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has been pleading with NATO countries to give Ukraine the green light to join.  The United States is, for now, opposed to the idea. The Biden administration does not want a confrontation with Russia.  The US Government, along with several European countries, believes that offering Ukraine membership now would lead to more escalation because Russian President Vladimir Putin could simply claim that NATO wants to attack Russia. But it has been Russia that has been escalating: the indiscriminate bombing of infrastructure and civilian targets, rape, torture, preventing Ukrainian grain exports and abducting children. Several big cities and towns in Ukraine now lie in ruins. The contrary view is that, if Ukraine is not offered NATO membership at Vilnius now, Russia will prolong the war.  One need only look at what happened after the NATO Bucharest summit in 2008 when France and Germany vetoed NATO from offering Ukraine (and Georgia) the Membership Action Plan – a roadmap to join the alliance. Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, Ukraine in 2014 and again in 2022.  The consequences of a ‘no’ in Vilnius, or the refusal by a group of countries to offer concrete security guarantees will not only prolong the war, it will also give Putin the signal to interfere in more countries in the region, leading to more instability, more destruction and more refugees.    That is the choice facing NATO and neutral countries. Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe

As Group Finance Director with Galgorm Collection, Tiarnán O’Neill has learned the value of constant reinvention and reinvestment in the competitive hospitality market In his role as Group Finance Director with Galgorm Collection, Tyrone-born Tiarnán O’Neill plays a leading role in the strategic direction of one of Northern Ireland’s most successful locally owned hospitality groups. Established in 1991 by brothers Nicholas and Paul Hill with the opening of Galgorm, the group has since expanded with the acquisition of two further hotel properties – The Rabbit Hotel & Retreat in Templepatrick and The Old Inn in Crawfordsburn – as well as Fratelli Restaurant and Parisien in Belfast. Even so, Galgorm, now a 380-acre spa and golf resort, remains the flagship property in the group. “We are very fortunate to have a loyal customer base that know Galgorm to be firmly focused on investment and innovation in their product offering. Our owners have invested heavily to establish Galgorm as an award-wining international and world-class tourism destination,” says O’Neill. “When they acquired the original Galgorm site on the River Maine back in 1991, it was a country house with 20 bedrooms. Over the last number of years, we have grown into an award-winning and world-class collection of hotels and restaurants, which will generate revenue circa £50 million this year.” Constant reinvestment Even as the dust settles on two recent acquisitions – The Rabbit Hotel & Retreat in Templepatrick, bought in 2019, and the historic Old Inn in Crawfordsburn, acquired in 2021 – The Galgorm Collection continues to look to the future with ambitious plans for the next five years.   “We’ve invested £20 million in The Rabbit Hotel & Retreat since the property was acquired and now it offers stylish accommodation, a luxury outdoor spa and lakeside walk, an onsite bar and restaurant and an events space for weddings and conferences,” says O’Neill.   “We were honoured to be recognised by the AA at their 2023 awards, with The Rabbit Hotel & Retreat being crowned Northern Ireland Hotel of the Year.  This is a fantastic endorsement of all the hard work that has gone into the extensive redevelopment.” The Galgorm Collection now plans to commence work on an additional 17 guestrooms at The Rabbit Hotel & Retreat at a cost of £2.5 million, following the opening of an exclusive £2.5 million resident-only outdoor Treetop Spa at The Old Inn. All 32 guestrooms at The Old Inn are also being upgraded as part of plans to revitalise and upgrade the historic destination.   “We’re confident that The Old Inn’s new-look offering will deliver a new chapter of growth for us and for Northern Ireland,” says O’Neill. Since 2010, £60 million has been invested into Galgorm and the first phase of a £30 million project to further expand and enhance the resort and spa facilities by 2027 has just been completed.   “Our guests’ appetite for new experiences, and our own desire to build on our reputation, means that the investment has got to continue,” says O’Neill. Early career Before joining Galgorm Collection, O’Neill had begun his career training as an Accounting Technician with PwC in Dungannon, his hometown. “After getting my A Levels, I actually went to Queen’s University Belfast first to study for a degree in economics and management,” he says. “I’d gone to the local grammar school and, if you got the grades there, you were expected to go to university, but it just didn’t suit me.” Instead, O’Neill decided to become an Accounting Technician, beginning his training with PwC and qualifying as a Chartered Accountant in 2012. “I just became a Fellow of Chartered Accountants Ireland last December and it was a proud moment for me, but I’m also very grateful that I started as an Accounting Technician, because I think that gave me some really valuable early-stage commercial experience,” he says. “Right at the very start of my time with PwC, I was looking after the accounts of sole traders, small partnerships, SMEs and a lot of farmers – it was non-audit accounting work, which gave me a firm grounding in debits and credits and the basics generally.  “My start was different to a lot of trainee Chartered Accountants who get sent into audit early on and don’t necessarily get experience in preparing a set of accounts. That’s stood me in good stead in the years since.” In all, O’Neill spent close to a decade with PwC. “After starting off as a technician, I then spent some time in personal tax before settling into the firm’s audit practice,” he says.  “Before I left, I was working with some quite big clients that were among the top 100 companies in Northern Ireland, local success stories in manufacturing, financial services, life science and biomedical – it was fantastic to get experience in such varied industries.   “Once qualified, I got to spend two to three months per year traveling to work in the likes of London, Edinburgh and Jersey in the Channel Islands, and New York.” A fresh challenge In 2017, O’Neill decided to leave behind the world of practice to take on a fresh challenge. “I wasn’t actively looking for a new opportunity, but I got a call one day asking if I would be interested in taking on the newly created role of Chief Operating Officer of the Diocese of Down and Connor,” he says. In this role, O’Neill was responsible for the financial management of the second largest diocese on the island of Ireland, after Dublin. “The Charity Commission for Northern Ireland had come into being, which brought new regulations and the requirement that some organisations, which had been run as charities up until then, be formally recognised as such,” he explains. “Working with the Diocese of Down and Connor, I went from being an audit manager to, overnight, being responsible for a £100 million-plus balance sheet, income of about £30 million and a 330-strong team.” The role involved streamlining operations and was “hugely enjoyable”, O’Neill says now. “It was about bringing the organisation back to its core, which meant divesting excess assets and services. O’Neill reported to a highly experienced Board of Trustees with high-profile members drawn from the legal, financial and other respected professions in Northern Ireland. “It was a tough board to be accountable to, but all of the members were very successful professionals in their own right. They were willing to give me their time, point me in the right direction and I learned a lot from all of them,” he says. Aged just 30 at the time he took on the role, O’Neill learned some valuable lessons in management and communication. “I found myself managing people who were quite a lot older than me in some cases. What I learned is that you have to find out what makes people tick and flex your style accordingly, so you can bring people with you rather than creating conflict.” The COVID-19 pandemic By mid-2019, O’Neill was once again ready for a new challenge, but just six months after joining Galgorm Collection, the pandemic took hold and Northern Ireland was plunged into the first of a series of lockdowns in March 2020. “We went from being a cash-rich business with a constant churn of coming in every day, to suddenly having nothing coming in overnight. We were lucky we had enough reserves to get us through,” he says. Galgorm Collection also implemented an employee assistance programme to support its nearly 1,000-strong team. “Ultimately, the pandemic made us more resilient, and we are extremely proud that we had no COVID-related redundancies throughout the entire pandemic,” says O’Neill. “We kept in contact with all of the team members. We had some employees who were used to working 40 to 60 hours a week in a very busy setting.  “All of a sudden, they were pulled out of this bustling work environment. We wanted to help them with the stresses of finding themselves isolated and locked down at home. The right balance The management team at Galgorm Collection adheres to a stringent corporate governance model to ensure that the right decisions are made, and the correct procedures followed at all times. “Any investment over a certain level has to be approved by the board, which meets bi-monthly. As long as the numbers stack up, we aim to make it work. We are not a highly leveraged business.  “The view is that, while we continue to invest and constantly enhance and add to our product offering, we also keep paying down any borrowings we have and stay lean, so we are in a position to grasp any opportunities that come along.” Galgorm Collection is always on the lookout for acquisitions that might fit, O’Neill says: “If it makes sense for us, we won’t turn down the right opportunity.”

Our Chartered Star 2023 winner Peter Gillen tells us about his work helping companies to reach their sustainability goals and gives us his take on sustainable finance  Peter Gillen, a sustainability manager in Grant Thornton’s Financial Services Advisory Department, was recently named Chartered Star 2023, an annual designation recognising outstanding work in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).   Run in partnership with One Young World and Chartered Accountants Worldwide, the aim of the annual Chartered Star competition is to celebrate the difference-makers in the profession who are helping to combat the climate crisis by bringing real, positive change to their workplaces and communities.  A graduate of Trinity College Dublin, Gillen grew up in Dundrum and began his career training with PwC before his passion for sustainability led him to join the Sustainability Team at Grant Thornton in 2021. As Chartered Star 2023, Gillen will attend One Young World Summit, representing Chartered Accountants Ireland and Chartered Accountants Worldwide, in Belfast in October. Here, he tells Accountancy Ireland about his interest in sustainability and gives us his take on ongoing developments in sustainable finance globally. Tell us about your decision to become a Chartered Accountant? What attracted you to the profession? When I was younger, particularly in the lead-up to the CAO application process in sixth year, family and friends told me accountancy was one of those qualifications that would allow me to work in any sector anywhere in the world. This has come to pass in my career so far as I’ve had the opportunity to work in Europe and the US as well as here in Ireland. Travel, in general, is one of the best ways I have found in my own life to learn from others. That’s why attending One Young World Summit later this year is so exciting to me. There will be so many people from many different countries, and we will have the opportunity to learn from both our shared experiences and different perspectives. What is it that initially sparked your interest in sustainability? I’ve always had an interest in sustainability and was frustrated by the slow pace of progress in the last decade or so. During the pandemic, when everyone had more time to reflect, I reconsidered the direction of my career and decided I would try to merge my training in financial services with my passion for sustainability. It was really about finding ways to use my knowledge to bring about real change and help companies on their sustainability journey. Chartered Accountants in general are uniquely placed to be right at the heart of sustainability discussions, and to deliver concrete plans to transition to a greener economy. There isn’t a medium- to large-sized organisation in the world that doesn’t employ a Chartered Accountant and we are uniquely placed to support ESG efforts, because of our problem-solving and analytical skill sets, our ability to take a step back and see the bigger picture, and lastly being able to apply our learnings from financial reporting to the impending sustainability reporting requirements, which will be applicable to companies over the next few years. What do you see as the greatest sustainability-related threats and challenges of our time? In terms of threats, it’s the classic, “the wants of the few outweigh the needs of the many”. Those in power – the few – often have self-interest in mind and their actions can have a disproportionate impact on others – the many. Those who have the power to influence real change are sometimes reluctant to do so. A classic example here is the large oil companies, or sometimes political leaders. Chartered Accountants working in leadership positions in large corporations really do have an important role to play in leading the way and convincing their stakeholders to tackle the climate crisis, not just for the planet but also for their companies’ long-term viability. For me, it comes down to collaboration, both nationally and internationally. Humankind is the single greatest determinant of the fate of our planet. We have the power to save our planet from becoming an uninhabitable place.  The challenge is trying to unite a large group to focus on one shared goal. History has shown us how difficult this can be, but also that it is possible and that it is often at times of catastrophic crisis that we unite. One example is the European Union, which was born in the aftermath of World War II. I’m confident that this time we can unite before it’s too late and introduce sufficient measures to address the issue. What is your take on current progress on Ireland’s Climate Action Plan? I think we have made a lot of progress, but we still have a long, long way to go. There are challenges but there is also immense opportunity for a country like Ireland. In particular, we have a unique opportunity to harness our coastline for the purposes of renewable energy – wind and wave, for example – and become a net exporter of energy instead of relying on imported fossil fuel-based energy sources. Reaching Ireland’s climate targets isn’t just about government action, though. Every single person has a role to play. For example, we have all become too reliant on convenience and this mindset needs to change. We need to learn to repair the goods we have where we can, instead of automatically replacing them – thinking differently about the lifespan of the items we own and the waste we generate. Tell us about Grant Thornton’s sustainability team and your role in it. I am a sustainability manager within our Financial Services Advisory Department. Our team helps our clients navigate all of the new environmental, social and governance (ESG) rules and regulations the EU and other regulatory bodies are bringing out. The world has really woken up to the climate crisis, so our work is evolving on a daily basis as legislators and regulators work to promote the transition to a greener economy. We help our clients to understand these requirements and the roadmap they need to put in place to meet them. My biggest career goal is to continue to help companies to support the UN SDGs, primarily by supporting SDG 13 Climate Action, because, for me, climate change is, without a doubt, the biggest challenge of our time. What do you think of the progress made by the European Commission thus far in progressing the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive? I’m optimistic about the progress they have made so far. The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), the European body drafting these standards, delivered their first set of draft standards to the European Commission last November. In order to ensure companies can implement these new standards, Mairead McGuinness, European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and the Capital Markets Union, has asked EFRAG to prioritise efforts on capacity-building, basically providing the relevant companies with a support function to help them implement the standards. As a result, EFRAG is pausing the roll-out of sector-specific standards for now, which I can understand given the circumstances. It’s important that companies are given sufficient support so that they may implement the sector-agnostic standards appropriately before moving forward with the sector-specific standards. What does it mean to you to be named Chartered Star 2023? It was an honour to win it and something I wouldn’t have thought possible all those years ago when I started my career in accountancy. The list of past winners is so impressive. To be chosen this year is a privilege and I have a responsibility as Chartered Star 2023 to continue the high standard in everything I do. Ultimately, I hope to continue to work towards the achievement of the UN’s SDGs for many years to come both in my personal life and through my career.

With the concept of a four-day working week gaining traction, three members of Chartered Accountants Ireland give us their take on the potential pros and cons of working fewer hours as standard in the future Kerri O’Connell Principal  Obvio Tax Services The four-day work week is an idea whose time has come! We are all aware that we are living through an era of great societal change, with many people questioning their lifestyle, their desire to buy more ‘stuff’ and the impact all of this has on the natural world around us.  The arrival of more advanced Artificial Intelligence is also likely to have a huge impact on our working lives. From a business perspective, many sectors are struggling to recruit and retain staff. The pressure is on in many aspects of the service industry, including professional, medical, construction and hospitality, and we are all aware of shortages of certain foods, medicines, etc. An economic ‘growth at all costs’ model, and accelerating expectations of ‘always available’ goods and services, create pressures that are doing none of us any good. Neither is a working week model that requires people to work on all of the days during which the services they require are accessible. Consider that the five-day working week (itself only 100 years old) was a sea change from the previously standard six-day week and, at the time, regarded as a great upheaval. That change bedded in over time, just as a four-day working week will too. The opportunity for parents to spend more time with children, for people to have more time available for caring obligations, or volunteer for a social/charitable organisation, is not just a ‘nice to have’ – it would bring fundamental benefits to our society and our environment. Many of us feel very resistant to change and only make a change when we are forced or pressurised to do so. If the past three years have taught us anything, however, it is that we are all more adaptable than we think. Shaun McGlade Managing Director SMCG Ltd. There has recently been a major shift in the perception of a four-day working week, which is now starting to gain real traction as an exciting workplace policy.    At its core, the paradox of shortening working hours for no less pay is in stark contrast to the dominant burnout culture of past decades, where working more was viewed as working better. Pilot schemes trialling the effectiveness of the four-day working week have yielded positive results. The largest to date was carried out last year in the UK by 4 Day Week Global, in partnership with Autonomy, an independent research organisation, the University of Cambridge and Boston College. Sixty-one companies employing 2,900 people took part in the UK’s Four-Day Week Pilot between June and December 2022. More than 92 percent opted to continue with a four-day working week after the six-month study concluded. With many people having adapted to flexible working following the pandemic, and a greater focus on work-life balance, there is a growing need for businesses to think differently about how they operate. A four-day working week could give some a competitive edge in the war for talent.  One of the most interesting findings of The UK’s Four-Day Week Pilot was that, among the 61 participating companies, revenue remained broadly the same over the course of the six-month trial, rising by 1.4 percent on average, weighted by company size.  When compared with a similar period from previous years, participants reported an average 35 percent revenue rise. So, while some employers are sceptical about the potential benefits of a four-day working week, my view is that it holds numerous potential benefits. These benefits range from a competitive edge for employers in the employment market, to higher staff retention, improved well-being, lower absenteeism, less burnout and reduced childcare costs for employees. Teresa Campbell Partner FPM  Around the world, interest in the potential benefits of a four-day working week is on the rise as employers and employees look for ways to improve well-being, enhance organisational performance and reduce the adverse impact of working life on society and the environment.  It is these positive outcomes that could make the four-day work week popular among employers in the future, so I think it is likely that we will see it become increasingly common – including in SMEs and accountancy practices – provided it is introduced in ways that do not adversely affect customer/client service.  In our own organisation, all of our team are actively encouraged to think about how we structure each working day.  We want our people to enjoy a healthy work-life balance, develop their careers and contribute to society in a meaningful way. We support flexible working and have measures in place to ensure that this does not disrupt our client services.  We are largely laptop-led, with a ‘work anywhere, anytime’ culture. We hold monthly virtual team gatherings and have developed and implemented a hybrid and flexible working policy, which piloted a four-day working week. More than 10 percent of our team avail of this option and our people say that the flexibility has changed their quality of life.  This is in addition to the over 22 percent who are working part-time, with the remainder either finishing at 1pm on a Friday or working the standard working week.     Our strategy has enabled some team members to continue to work while travelling internationally, and has also facilitated higher levels of female participation in our leadership teams.    One of the main factors for the success of our flexible working policies is that they enhance job satisfaction and encourage autonomy. Our experience is that team members both appreciate flexible working and are themselves very willing to be flexible, stepping up where necessary to meet urgent client demands.  Overall, it is a two-way process with everyone committed to enhancing, rather than diluting, our clients’ experience. 

Ross O’Connor, CFO with aircraft leasing company Avolon, talks us through the career path that took him from practice to a high-flying career in international aviation Originally from Ballinrobe in County Mayo, Ross O’Connor studied at Trinity College Dublin and qualified as a Chartered Accountant while working with Deloitte in Ireland. After joining Avolon in 2011 as a business analyst, he rose through the ranks at the aircraft leasing company to become Chief Financial Officer. Here, O’Connor tells Accountancy Ireland about the factors that prompted his move from practice to industry and his experiences in a niche sector with international reach. Tell us about your career starting out and how and why you became a Chartered Accountant? I studied Management Science and Information Systems at Trinity College Dublin and then joined the CFO Services Group at Deloitte as an analyst, eventually becoming a senior consultant.  By the time I left six years later, I’d worked across a pretty broad range of projects in the public and private sector and knew I wanted to move into industry, so I could really get to know and progress my career in a specific sector as opposed to working across a range of sectors. I had qualified as a Chartered Accountant as well by that stage, which gave me a structured qualification I felt I could rely on in any professional environment. Why did you decide to move into the aircraft leasing sector?  I didn’t know a whole lot about the sector at that stage, to be honest, but the more I learned about it, the more it appealed to me.  The sector emerged in Ireland in the 1970s and there is now a wealth of talent in the country. There is also an increasing focus on the sector through specialised training courses like the MSc in Aviation Finance at UCD Smurfit School. A big attraction for countries dealing with aircraft leasing companies like Avolon in Ireland is that we have double tax treaties throughout the world. This gives us a big advantage over leasing companies in other countries.  For me, the highly transactional nature of the business is really appealing. There is constant momentum and movement, and when I joined Avolon in 2011, it was still in the start-up phase.  The company had only just launched the previous year, it was well capitalised and key decisions were being made here in Ireland. I knew I would have a really great opportunity to grow and develop my career.  It is a small sector, so relationships are important. It is also competitive. Ultimately, you want to win business. A lot of the aircraft we lease are similar, so how successful you are comes down to how competitive you can be and how strong your relationships with your customers are. How did your career path with Avolon progress from 2011 onwards? I started as a business analyst on the Transaction Structuring Team, which helped me to learn about the various elements of how the business operated and, from there, I moved into a sales role in Aircraft Trading, which involved selling aircraft to global investors and leasing companies. That work allowed me to travel in Asia and the US and gave me a chance to see the world, which was brilliant on both a professional and personal level.  From there, I moved to the Capital Markets Team, which funds the business, raising money from banks, public markets and other investors.  At that time, we were evolving from a bank-funded model through to funding primarily in public markets, which was an interesting journey.  I was appointed Head of Capital Markets in 2020 and then took up my current role as Chief Financial Officer in October 2022. Talk us through how Avolon has evolved since you joined the company? Today, we have $30 million of assets, 578 aircraft flying around the world and customers in 65 countries. It’s a big business with an international presence. It’s taken us a while to get here. We had 20 staff in 2011 and we were private equity backed. We listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2014 and that was a huge event.  We were public for about a year and then we were taken private again by Bohai Leasing, a company in China, at a 55 percent premium to our listing price. Bohai had a real ambition to grow and injected more equity into the business.  In 2017, we acquired the aircraft leasing business of CIT Group, one of our competitors, for $10 billion. That deal doubled our size and catapulted us into a different realm in terms of global scale.  We’ve continued to grow the business since. Last year, we had $2.3 billion revenue and $253 million net income.  What impact did COVID-19 have on Avolon and on your role as CFO? It was a black swan event where we suddenly had a global fleet grounded across the board. At that time, I was working on the funding side of the business with $18.5 billion of outstanding debt so a lot of our investors were calling and asking what was happening.  We run stress tests on our business all the time and one of our key points is that our assets are usually transferable from a challenging market to somewhere else in the world where there is demand, but COVID-19 was a global phenomenon. Thankfully, we were in the position to leverage a strong balance sheet, investment grade credit rating and high levels of liquidity, so we could protect the business through the challenges.  When airlines started asking for deferrals on their rentals during the pandemic, we were able to support them in a lot of cases because we already had a lot of liquidity.  We started to defer some of our order book to make sure we had enough cash in the business and quantitative easing in the US allowed us to raise capital to support this. Our profitability was hit in 2020 and 2021 when some of our airline customers went bankrupt or restructured, so now the focus is on returning the business to our pre-COVID profitability. It’s going well. Air traffic is back up and the reopening of China has driven increased traffic in Asia. We are seeing rising demand for our aircraft because supply chains for manufacturers like Boeing are struggling to produce aircraft quickly enough. What next for Avolon in 2023 and beyond? We are focused on growth and driving our financial performance following the impact of COVID. The major positive is that the market backdrop is very supportive. Airline demand for aircraft and aircraft leasing has increased dramatically with rising passenger traffic.  Right now, we own a fleet of 578 planes, with a further 252 on order. We have 147 customers spread around the world and about 45 percent of our business is in Asia, with long-term demographic trends that are very supportive of aviation. India and the Middle East are also big growth regions for us.  We issued a US$750 million bond offering in May. We haven’t issued a bond since August 2021 because the markets have been quite volatile due to COVID-19, the war in Ukraine and rising interest rates.  We have lots of different funding channels and we have relied on some of our private funding channels over the last year to 18 months, but ultimately, we see the primary source of our funding as coming from public markets. Getting back into the bond market was an important milestone.  From an internal perspective we’re really focused on further enhancements to the learning and development opportunities we offer the team.  Recently we launched Accelerate, a bespoke leadership development programme for emerging leaders with a particular focus on developing our female leadership pipeline. Looking back now, do you have any regrets  about the decision to train as a Chartered Accountant? No, no regrets. The training you get as a Chartered Accountant gives you a very good grounding in terms of the quality and scope of what you can offer as a professional.  When I was working in sales and trading here at Avolon, I was able to understand how the financials would impact and, when I went on to work in capital markets, I was able to figure out angles on the deals I was working on because of my knowledge as a Chartered Accountant. The world opens up to you because there are so many career options available to you. The appeal for me with Avolon is that it is an Irish-based company with a global reach and outlook.  That creates opportunity. It’s a constantly changing environment and that is what makes it so exciting and fulfilling for me.

Employment may be holding up for now but rising recessionary signals point to troubled times ahead, writes Cormac Lucey For some time now, recessionary signals have   been building up. Looking back over half a century, recessions tend to follow a distinct path.  First, central banks raise interest rates and tighten financial conditions. Second, the sectors most exposed to interest rates – construction and property – begin to suffer.  Third, the next most exposed sectors – banking and finance – undergo financial stress. And finally, deflationary pressures hit the general economy and the employment market suffers.  Midway through 2023, we have already hit stages one, two and three.  After a slow start, the European Central Bank has raised rates at a faster pace than ever before. The property sector is already suffering. Shares in the Irish Residential Properties REIT have dropped by about 40 percent over the last nine months.  And while the share prices of Irish banks have been holding up well, there is an air of subdued panic across the entire banking sector following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, Credit Suisse and First Republic.  Like characters in an Agatha Christie thriller, banks are anxiously wondering who will be next to be written out of the script.  So far, though, labour markets remain firm. In March, Ireland’s unemployment rate was 4.3 percent, a smidgen above the 3.9 percent minimum achieved in 2000/2001.  There are two features of this economic cycle that may be delaying the labour market’s rendezvous with recession. These features apply to Ireland and across the Western world.  First, following the massive fiscal splurge to cushion the economic effects of COVID-19, people on both sides of the Atlantic have hefty cash positions, making them less sensitive to interest rate hikes.  The latest Central Bank of Ireland quarterly financial accounts show that, comparing September 2022 with March 2020, Irish households’ financial assets have grown by €79.6 billion (19%) while their net worth has grown by €253.5 billion (32%). Second, lockdown mandates to stay at home, greater vulnerability to COVID-19 as one gets older, and the State’s pandemic splurge appear to have led a significant cohort of people to accelerate the move to retire.  With fewer people at work, full employment can be achieved with fewer total jobs.   But the main reason the unemployment dog has yet to bark is that employment is a lagging economic indicator.  Changes in employment trends happen after changes in the direction of economic output. When the economy moves from growth to contraction, employers do not immediately cut their workforce. They wait until they are sure that they must.  Many employers rushed to downsize during the pandemic and then found it difficult to recruit again once recovery arrived. Similarly, employers won’t immediately rehire once economic recovery kicks in. They will put staff on overtime while assessing the situation. On his True Insights website, investor Jeroen Blokland has observed that, on average, the US unemployment rate rises by four percentage points in the aftermath of a significant Federal Reserve tightening cycle. “Unemployment tends to start rising after the Fed is done hiking,” he noted.  Blokland reckons there is an average gap of about 20 months between the final Fed interest rate hike and the ensuing peak in unemployment.  Even if the Fed announced in June that it had completed raising rates, we might have to wait until March 2025 to reach peak unemployment. With Ireland having undergone significant private sector deleveraging since the financial crash, there is little likelihood of a self-feeding credit crunch, but our economy is highly dependent on a small number of US multinationals.  It has been reported that, last year, Apple paid €8 billion in corporation tax to the State. This represents about €1.3 million per employee. It contrasts with the roughly €60,000 Apple paid on corporation tax for each employee outside Ireland.  It’s a fragile foundation on which to build the public finances.  Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Sustainability is often seen as the domain of large corporates but SMEs have the collective potential to be more powerful players. Sheila Killian explains why Social and environmental sustainability is often seen as more relevant to big multinational companies (MNCs) than to SMEs, small-to medium enterprises employing no more than 250 people. MNCs are more likely to have a sustainability strategy, and resources for its implementation, monitoring, reporting and communication.  They are more likely to report externally, integrating their reporting across sustainability and financial activities, and to be scored by ESG rating agencies.  This does not mean that MNCs carry all the responsibility or should reap all the benefits, however.  SMEs are enormously impactful in aggregate and have a huge amount to gain by getting involved. So, why and how should they engage? The potential impact of SMEs on sustainability SMEs have a massive collective impact. In Ireland, they account for seven jobs in 10. While large companies are commonly exporters, SMEs tend to serve their local region.  In terms of where people live, work, shop and spend their leisure time, smaller enterprises dominate. This amplifies both their responsibility, and the opportunities open to them. Because SMEs are embedded in their communities, they often make a huge contribution socially without realising it. This may lie less in strategy than in values.  David O’Mahony of O’Mahony’s Booksellers Ltd, a long-established independent bookshop in the south-west, sums up the position: “It’s only when you really think about it and put all the things together that you realise that there’s a lot more going on … [in corporate responsibility and sustainability] … than we would have probably realised ourselves.”  O’Mahony’s enjoys high social capital locally, gained through understated good work for the community and environment, derived from values and a sense of neighbourliness rather than from formal reporting.  Why SMEs do not report Despite this implicit moral accountability, many SME owners do not think about reporting externally on their sustainability. This is often because they don’t see the value to be gained. Compared with MNCs, there is much less separation between ownership and management/control in SMEs.  Therefore, the need for both internal and external reporting is reduced because the main shareholders are already intimate with what is going on in the business, and employees are closer to the leadership.  Unless the business is considering raising external finance, there is little need to consider how potential investors might perceive it, and if there is a perception that customers are not interested in sustainability activities, these will not be reported.  It seems to come naturally to SMEs to be community-oriented, however, often because they are family-owned, and such behaviour reflects the origins and values of the family.  Such firms tend not to have formal, written codes of conduct, but instead propagate the personal values of their owners, who do not consider that a separate, published set of values and reporting on their social and environmental activities is necessary for business. Why SMEs should report One reason for SMEs to begin some form of sustainability reporting is so that they can compete with MNCs locally to attract and retain talented employees.  The labour market is tight, remote working has shifted the power balance, and younger generations are more focused on sustainability.  Increasingly, SMEs are framing their sustainability credentials more clearly, and connecting them with their employer brand so that they can attract the talent they need.  There is also a consumer angle. The challenge posed by behemoth online retailers to small, local bricks-and-mortar businesses is now well-rehearsed.  A small, independent business, like a bookshop, needs to clarify and articulate its values and personal touch as a competitive advantage.  This ‘personality’ needs to be communicated externally if it is to reach the right customers effectively. Sustainability reporting can convey a sense of what the company is all about, its values and purpose – its ‘soul’. A third reason, particularly applicable to SMEs operating in the business-to-business sphere, is that reporting on strong sustainability metrics confers an advantage in entering the supply chains of larger firms.  If, for instance, an MNC is moving towards zero-carbon, it is likely to require smaller companies in its supply chain to be also on that journey.  A fourth reason to report is the internal value to be gained from paying attention to sustainability. Measuring, reporting and constructing a narrative around social and environmental values will improve the culture of the business, and pave the way to greater innovation.  Hotel Doolin in County Clare is an example of a small business that tells its sustainability story effectively. It has shortened its supply chain by buying local produce.  The hotel harvests rainwater, it has eliminated single-use plastics, and uses environmentally low-impact energy and heating. It became Ireland’s first carbon-neutral hotel in 2019, under the Green Hospitality Programme, ahead of many larger competitors.  The business also promotes social sustainability, employing refugees, supporting local community groups and actively seeks to be a good employer. This has enhanced its reputation not only locally but nationwide.  Partnering with not-for-profits Smaller companies that are ambitious in terms of sustainability targets will inevitably want to achieve things that are beyond their capacity.  If, for example, a business decides to work on the water quality in the area in which it operates, it may lack in-house expertise, jeopardising its credibility with the local community. One solution may be a partnership with a not-for-profit organisation (NFP). NFPs often have the expertise to tackle social and environmental issues but lack the resources, whereas companies may have resources (money) but lack the knowledge. A partnership can achieve sustainability goals if the match is right.  The NFP needs to be operating in the area in which the company wants to make progress, and the company needs to align with the NFP’s approach to society and the environment.  Mutual respect and consultation are key. At worst, a partnership can be seen as a ‘fig leaf’ for the SME and can undermine the legitimacy of the NFP. At best, it can be truly impactful for all involved. SMEs’ supply chain responsibilities  MNCs are famously held responsible for the working conditions in which their goods are produced by companies in their supply chains. Scandals, including the sweatshop labour exposed in the 1990s to the Rana Plaza garment factory collapse in Bangladesh in 2013, have forced companies such as Nike, Gap and Nestlé to change their practices.  Bad practices persist today, however, even where goods are produced close to home. In 2020, for example, it was revealed that online vendor BooHoo was selling clothes made in extremely poor working conditions in Leicester in the UK.  For a small, independent retailer, this means that, unless it takes steps to assure itself of the origin of the goods it sells, the risk remains that all or some element/s of those goods may have been produced in sweatshop conditions.  Smaller firms may lack resources to monitor conditions in their suppliers’ factories. Nor are they likely to have the requisite buying power to impose a code of conduct on their suppliers. So, what can they do about the conditions under which the goods they sell are produced? The International Labour Organization has clarified that a firm has responsibility as far up the supply chain as it has ‘reasonable influence’.  Large firms can leverage direct buying power to positively impact supplier. Starbucks works with its coffee producers to bring them up to higher social and environmental sustainability standards, for example.  A small trader is, however, limited to choosing suppliers wisely, and using their influence when feasible, perhaps working with other firms in the sector. The key differences between the supply chain responsibility of MNCs and SMEs, then, relate to power and influence. This principle also applies to other areas of sustainability. More power means more responsibility and the potential to make a positive impact.  SMEs need to address all the key issues of fair pricing, employee welfare, human rights and environmental impact within their own operations and – as far as possible – outside of them, bearing in mind their levels of resources and power.  The key questions here are: “Are we doing all we reasonably can to achieve sustainable practice?” and “Are we seeking to improve?”  Sometimes, acting in concert with other SMEs, can achieve more. The outcome may not be perfection, but honest efforts in the right direction will carry collective weight.  Sustainability and the SME advantage While corporate sustainability is often seen as the domain of MNCs, SMEs – because of their numbers and connection with, and impact on, society – are potentially more important players.  Many SMEs do not report their sustainability policies for several reasons, including informality, time and resource pressures, unfamiliarity with reporting standards and frameworks, or because a strong internal locus of value and ethical behaviour is already vested in their owners and leaders.  However, SMEs generally have high levels of engagement with their local communities and implement sustainability on an intuitive basis, drawing on leaders’ personal values. Reporting these efforts can bring significant advantages externally and internally.  Despite a lack of resources relative to larger companies, the key to building sustainable value for SMEs lies in making the best choices that are within their power at a given time. Sheila Killian is Associate Professor at Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, and author of Doing Good Business: How to Build Sustainable Value

With the Central Bank of Ireland’s consultation on the Individual Accountability Framework drawing to a close later this month, Níall Fitzgerald reviews the scope and effectiveness of similar regimes already in place in other parts of the world Following the 2008 financial crisis, global governance and regulatory reforms in the financial services sector have had a significant impact on how financial institutions, such as banks, insurance companies and investment firms, are run.  The EU has been at the forefront of regulatory change in financial services in Ireland since the creation of the Banking Union, which includes the European Supervisory Mechanism, and significant regulatory developments from rule-setters such as the European Banking Authority.  The Central Bank of Ireland has also put in place governance requirements for all financial institutions and implemented fitness and probity standards. These have included regulations requiring minimum competencies for individuals working in certain roles and, in some cases, regulatory pre-approval before individuals can be appointed to certain management positions, such as – to name just a few – board director, head of compliance, head of internal audit and chief risk officer. The proposed Central Bank of Ireland Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) is an extension of the current suite of regulations and efforts to address cultural failings and ensure better governance, performance and accountability among financial services firms.  The IAF is not the first of its kind, however, and while it has some unique features, it also shares similarities with regimes of this nature operating in other parts of the world.  UK: Senior Managers and Certification Regime The UK introduced the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) in 2016. Following a three-phase roll-out over three years, the SM&CR now applies to banks, insurance companies and a large portion of the remaining regulated financial services firms in the UK. This regime introduced: Prescribed responsibilities for certain roles; Requirements for firms to follow when allocating those roles to individuals, including: applying a certification process (up to obtaining pre-approval from the Regulator for an appointment to a role); and  the introduction of individual conduct rules. Hong Kong: Manager-in-Charge Regime In Hong Kong, The Securities and Futures Commission introduced the Manager-in-Charge (MIC) Regime for licensed corporations in 2017.  The regime did not bring in any new sanctions and was implemented by way of circular, rather than legislation, but it provided the regulator with additional powers of enforcement and the ability to hold individuals to account. A key objective of the MIC regime is to enable Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission to assess culture within the licensed organisation.  The regulator attributes non-compliance with elements of the regime – e.g. failure to assess whether individuals have discharged their responsibilities appropriately, as evidence of cultural failings. Australia: Banking Executive Accountability Regime  Australia’s Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) came into effect in 2018, applying to the directors of, and the most senior and influential executives within, banks and authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs). The regime introduced prescribed responsibilities for certain roles, an accountability framework, and a list of accountability obligations, which look a lot like conduct rules.  The regime also introduced a requirement for relevant firms to defer a portion of the variable remuneration of any person found to be non-compliant with the regime until an investigation concludes, whether or not any or all of the remuneration is subject to clawback.  Singapore: Individual Accountability and Conduct Guidelines  The Individual Accountability and Conduct (IAC) Guidelines were introduced in Singapore in 2021. Like the MIC regime in Hong Kong, Singapore’s IAC Guidelines are not supported by underlying legislation and are described as “best practice standards”.  The level of adherence to IAC Guidelines among the financial institutions will impact the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s overall risk assessment of the relevant organisation or individual.  These guidelines focus on embedding a strong culture of responsibility and ethical behaviour by ensuring individual accountability and a supportive governance framework within regulated organisations.  Prevention is better than cure While there are similarities between the accountability regimes outlined above, none is the same.  The instances of enforcement action taken under these regimes are very low and, if prevention is better than cure, this may be a good measure of success.  Just one enforcement action was taken against an individual for non-compliance during the first four years of the UK’s SM&CR, for example. Following a review of Australia’s Banking Executive Accountability Regime, and amid public criticism citing the lack of enforcement action, the Australian government is currently proposing the wider reaching Financial Accountability Regime (FAR).  The FAR contains additional requirements and extends the regime beyond banks to other financial service providers regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.  Elsewhere, the United Arab Emirates does not have a specific accountability regime. However, its laws and regulations, which pre-date 2016, give financial services regulators enforcement powers to hold individuals to account and apply sanctions.  Looking at just one member of the United Arab Emirates, Dubai, the Dubai Financial Services Authority has taken enforcement action against 32 individuals since 2016. The majority of these cases have related to individuals providing investment services.  Perhaps it is still too early to reliably judge the effectiveness of these various models of individual accountability regimes.  Sometimes, there is a benefit in not being first past the post in introducing a regime of this nature and being able to stand back and learn from global experiences.  With our Individual Accountability Framework, Ireland is building on a solid foundation of banking regulations and governance requirements. The IAF is only one of many regulatory changes impacting financial services providers. Other requirements on the way include the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and the inevitable evolution of governance codes, and other regulations, addressing sustainability and other emerging risks.  World-class standards are laudable, but their true outcome is only evident when we have a high level of public trust and a financial services sector that is efficient and competitive, driving a better future for society and a prosperous economy. Níall Fitzgerald, FCA, is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland Impact of individual accountability on organisational culture Chartered Accountants Ireland welcomes the timely publication by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) of the Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) draft regulations and guidance, and the certainty of action required for Irish financial services firms, writes Níall Fitzgerald.  The framework contains measures, including conduct standards and prescribed responsibilities, designed to enhance customer-focused cultures and embed responsibility and ethical behaviour across financial services in Ireland.  While it promotes the necessity for cultural change, the CBI agrees that more is required to achieve this. Insights from the introduction of similar measures in other jurisdictions show that an individual accountability regime better impacts on organisational culture when supported by: Promoting individual accountability but emphasising collective decision-making Being accountable as individuals for actions and behaviour is not new. Professionals are accountable to codes of ethics. There are also many laws and regulations that hold individuals accountable for their roles in an organisation, such as fiduciary duties of directors. However, many organisations thrive on collaboration, teamwork and diversity, which improve collective decision-making. Individual accountability is not designed to override this, and emphasising other positive behaviours, such as these, supports the objectives of the IAF. Promoting a ‘just culture’ and avoiding a ‘blame culture’ A blame culture focuses on identifying culprit/s, penalising them, and moving forward on the assumption that the same issue/s won’t happen again, because an example has been set.  A just culture acknowledges that mistakes and underperformance can occur, but that both are better addressed by reflecting on what went wrong and focusing on what can be learned to improve future outcomes.  Individual accountability exists in both scenarios, but the latter will have a more positive impact amongst the workforce, helping to achieve the objectives of the IAF. Promoting trust and integrity Certain informal reactions to a regime such as the Individual Accountability Framework can undermine its objectives. In some jurisdictions individuals with prescribed responsibilities prepare personal compliance files, for example, privately maintained outside of the firm’s documentation system.  A ‘cover your actions’ (CYA) approach has developed in these jurisdictions, whereby there is a tendency to give advice formally (e.g. in writing), which would differ if given informally (e.g. verbally).  Notwithstanding the risk of breaching privacy and confidentiality rules, these informal practices are indicative of low levels of trust and integrity within a firm.  Embedding a culture of psychological safety can deter this risk and foster greater trust within the organisation.

As this year’s annual LGBTQ+ celebration begins, we talk to six BALANCE members about their experiences in life and work As Pride celebrations kick off all over the world this month, six members of BALANCE, the Institute’s LGBTQ+ Allies network group, tell us about their experiences and what employers can do to support true equality.  Eimer Proctor Senior Manager When I first came out, Pride felt like a celebration and a safe space to be myself. Over the years, I’ve come to appreciate that this is not always possible, but I respect the path that has been forged by others to get us where we are today. During Pride 2023, I will remember those who lost their lives and stand in solidarity with my LGBTQ+ community around the world who still face persecution and continue to fight for their right to be who they are. It’s eight years since Ireland achieved marriage equality, and yet it was only in January 2020 that the law in Northern Ireland finally caught up. Given our current political situation in Northern Ireland, it’s unlikely that we will see any further advancements in LGBTQ+ rights and equality in the near future.  I find this very concerning given the rise in hate crimes, conversion therapy and anti-trans rhetoric in the media. It is up to everyone to help end discrimination for the LGBTQ+ community and promote equality.  There has been some great progress in recent years concerning diversity and inclusion in the workplace, but there is still work to be done to protect LGBTQ+ employees and at the heart of this is education.  Employers can introduce diversity and inclusion policies and practices, for example appoint diversity champions and work with employees to help them understand the appropriate language they should use in the workspace. Liaising with employees in the LGBTQ+ community and their allies is vital to understanding the obstacles the members of this community face every day. This, in turn, facilitates a greater understanding of how and why diversity and inclusion policies can directly impact business.  Those employees will, in time, become more comfortable to be themselves within their workplace, as they navigate the corporate world with the full support of their employer. Having these policies in place will also help to attract talented candidates, who will be carefully considering organisations with a strong commitment to diversity and inclusion.  Conor Hudson Finance Director It’s a general perception that Pride means ‘celebration’ and ‘party’. And, yes, this is a part of Pride – a platform to be yourself and express yourself, but still people are also joining Pride to ‘protest’ and it is important to remember that Pride started as a protest. Equality for LGBTQ+ colleagues in the workplace isn’t about sticking up a rainbow flag at the start of June.  Last year, in my organisation, a colleague and I launched an LGBTQ+ Employee Resource Group (ERG) with the intention of discussing Pride. While the initial reaction was positive, one response we received was, “We support LGBTQ+ rights; why do we still need to talk about Pride?” This remark justified why we needed an ERG – to increase visibility and offer a safe space to LGBTQ+ colleagues and colleagues with LGBTQ+ family. It is important for employees to feel part of an open and inclusive workplace from day one and allyship helps support this.  One of the actions we have taken to demonstrate visible allyship is to create MS Teams backgrounds and badges to highlight that this person identifies as an ally. We have found these a useful tool during recruitment and first introductions.  Allyship and open workplaces not only positively impact LGBTQ+ colleagues but can also support colleagues with LGBTQ+ friends and family.  Creating safe spaces for allies is equally important. They can’t be expected to know all the answers and they should be able to ask genuine questions without being judged. This culture not only creates open environments for LGBTQ+ colleagues, but also for other intersectional aspects of diversity. Hugo Slevin Head of Function Pride is a great day for us as an LGBTQ+ community, along with our allies, to come together and show unity, and strengthen through open visibility. It is always around this time of year that we start hearing the same question, “Why do we still have Pride?”, but I think it remains such an important day as shown by events over the past 12 months. First, we continue to witness attacks against our community members in ever-increasing numbers. Attacks across Europe are currently at a 10-year high and recent media coverage in Ireland has again brought this sharply into focus.  As a community, we should be able to feel safe in expressing and being who we are. Pride is very much our time to come together and have a platform to vocalise and display these concerns. We have also witnessed attempts to control the narrative on gay rights across the globe. Of significant concern has been what appears to be a regressing of rights in parts of the US, where this downward trend seems set to continue.  Even in Ireland, we have seen attacks on libraries and the cancelling of drag events in the last 12 months. Pride is the time of year during which our voices can be heard, and we stand against deliberate attempts to silence our community. Finally, Pride is fun! The streets of Dublin come alive – there is a real sense of occasion and happiness in the air. We get to walk the streets, dance and celebrate with our family, friends and co-workers. Jonathan Totterdell Major Programmes, Financial Services Pride in 2023 means a day of visibility and courage for both the progress we have made and the long path ahead for LGBTQ+ people around the world.  Recent events such as anti-LGBTQ+ Bills being passed in Florida and – closer to home, the rise of the far right and their anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric – remind us that progress can be rolled back quickly, and it is imperative that those who live in relative safety can make some noise for those who can’t, without fear of repercussions. Over the past decade, I think we have seen some huge successes with gay marriage, a more open culture and a focus by corporates among Ireland to bring diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) to the C-suite. The financial services sector has been making really impressive strides. While there is a business case for DE&I, and many studies have shown that it leads to improved return on investment, I would like to see corporates in Ireland mature on this front, continue to grow their social consciousness, and see DE&I as a positive without the need to prove its financial return. Employers are expected to be ‘all in’ on DE&I in 2023, having the uncomfortable conversations that sometimes come with this topic, appointing champions and including DE&I as part of their leadership ethos. Inclusion is key on the DE&I agenda. You can have a diverse workforce, but without active inclusion, you will be missing a vital ingredient.  One thing I practice is to try to make sure everyone gets a chance to speak up at meetings and contribute ideas and viewpoints to decision-making. When people feel comfortable, they will be able to communicate their ideas more effectively.  Padraig Kilkenny Finance Manager For me, Pride is first and foremost a celebration. It is also an opportunity to reflect on the struggles for equality, not only in our own country, but for LGBTQ+ people across the world.  There is no doubt that Ireland has made considerable progress in terms of LGBTQ+ rights and fostering greater equality in recent years. Landmark victories such as the 2015 Marriage Equality Referendum and gender recognition legislation have increased visibility and acceptance across Irish society.  The Ireland of today reflects a society that embraces diversity and supports LGBTQ+ rights. This has never been more evident than at Chartered Accountants Ireland with initiatives such as the BALANCE network and, more generally, with its support for diversity and inclusivity initiatives. Personally, I am fortunate that I have never felt discriminated against in the workplace, but this is not to say that discrimination does not exist. What I have found helpful in my career is having LGBTQ+ representation at senior levels of the organisation and feeling that I have support from my colleagues and leadership.  I think this support can come in many forms from the highest levels where diversity and inclusion form part of the organisation’s strategy, values and by extension its culture, to more practical efforts, such as establishing and enforcing inclusive policies that protect LGBTQ+ employees from discrimination in areas like recruitment, promotion and benefits. Effective allyship is more than just having policies and strategies in place. It is about supporting and advocating for the rights, well-being and inclusion of LGBTQ+ employees.  Everyone should understand and challenge their own biases through education and listen to LGBTQ+ colleagues, valuing their experiences, and amplifying their voices and perspectives in discussions and decision-making processes.  Pride is a great marker in the calendar for employers to stop and reflect where they are on this journey to foster and support real equality across the board. Áine Crotty Audit and Outsourcing Manager As a leader of a team in my workplace, I believe in the power of people and the true potential that is inside each and every one of my colleagues regardless of their gender, age, sexual orientation, etc.  Therefore, being an ally to my LGBTQ+ colleagues is important to me because it supports them in reaching their full potential.  Non-LGBTQ+ professionals need to be aware of their actions and any potential bias they might have – without the awareness, there cannot be any action or change.  I would recommend attending events such as those organised by BALANCE so you can become aware of the issues your LGBTQ+ colleagues are facing.  There are also some fantastic resources and training out there about unconscious bias that will enable you to change the language you use or how you perceive and treat your colleagues.  After awareness comes accountability. As a non-LGBTQ+ professional, hold yourself accountable to making your work environment a more inclusive place for your colleagues. Make a commitment to yourself and others to change how you act with your LGBTQ+ colleagues for the better. Become an ally and be open and proud of that fact. Letting your colleagues know that you are an ally, and that you fully support them, can make them feel more comfortable in the workplace and allow them to speak more freely about any issues or discrimination they might be facing. It is widely known and accepted that culture comes from the tone at the top. Leaders, whether it be partners or senior executive management team members, need to bring DE&I to the forefront of their agenda. They need to live and breathe what they believe in and what they are trying to achieve for their employees. They need to lead by example and visibly demonstrate their belief in equality for all.

Ann-Marie Costello became the first female partner on the Corporate Finance Team at Grant Thornton earlier this year. Her advice to other women? Back yourself and take opportunities I grew up in a family of medical professionals, so accountancy was not necessarily the expected path. I actually changed from veterinary to commerce and German the day before the CAO application process closed, so my career could have been very different.   Opting to do a degree in commerce and German gave me time to decide what I wanted to pursue as a career. I found I really enjoyed the economics and accountancy modules, so it felt like a natural progression to go on to do the Master of Accounting at UCD Smurfit School before taking up a training contract with KPMG Corporate Recovery.  At the time, the accountancy ‘milk round’ was more geared towards traditional audit and tax routes, so joining an advisory team was the path less taken, but I really wanted the commercial experience that came with it.  Hitting the ground running Having a solid background in accountancy meant I could hit the ground running in Corporate Recovery and I had great training working on trading insolvencies. After qualifying and becoming a manager with KPMG, I left Ireland for a year of ‘anti-reality’, travelling the world.  When I returned, I met with Grant Thornton’s Debt Restructuring Team, who were pivoting away from insolvency. I liked the team and the idea of working to bring businesses back onto a stable footing.  After a few years, I transitioned to Corporate Finance and I made Partner in January of this year, becoming the first female partner in the department.  These days, my work is focused on helping shareholders to position themselves for the sale of a business and to maximise value. Most of my work has an M&A or due diligence focus.  So, in my career so far, I have been able to work with businesses across the entire economic cycle. Fall-off in female talent It just so happens that the areas in which I have worked have been particularly male-dominated, especially at senior levels.  My intake and training contract had a healthy mix of female versus male trainees but, from the manager level onwards, I saw a fall-off in female talent.  The reasons for the fall-off vary, ranging from the lack of a clear path for career progression, lack of support or mentorship, and movement from practice to industry, to work-life balance considerations and family commitments.  The diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) agenda was not well-developed when I was training, and as that has begun to change in more recent years, I think that it has brought some significant benefits. I do believe we have seen a move towards greater equity at senior levels – although the pace of change is slower than we may like, I think we’re getting there. We do need more balanced representation to attract younger generations – the ‘if you can’t see it, you can’t be it’ adage.  Greater supports are needed in the form of allyship and mentorship, as well as ensuring the wider conditions to support talent retention are met – these include issues such as childcare, paternity leave (both availability and take up) and flexible working.  There are wider societal shifts that need to become the norm to level the playing field further. Gender pay gap reporting Gender pay gap reporting has been a welcome development in terms of driving good behaviours within business and providing employees with greater transparency.  However, nothing can substitute the conversations on the ground that can provide you with clarity as to where you stand.  Conversations regarding remuneration, promotion and performance are often uncomfortable, so we sometimes tend to avoid broaching these subjects.  Time and time again, recruiters and HR teams tell me that, as women, we often undersell ourselves and have lower expectations for remuneration. We need to value our contributions more.  Do your research, back yourself and don’t be afraid to step out of your comfort zone to take on opportunities as they present themselves. Learning the skills for success At some point in your career, you will need to do more than just to be ‘good at the job’. At that stage, developing your career becomes about your network, your profile and your leadership. It is important to learn to have confidence in yourself and to value your input. This often comes with surrounding yourself with the right people, so don’t be afraid to talk – to your peers, your friends and your network. You will only ever regret the things you didn’t do, or say, so speak up and say ‘yes’ to opportunities for development. In my own experience, navigating career development and parenthood is not without its challenges. You need all the support you can get and to always try to look after yourself.  We just had our second baby towards the end of last year, a year during which I was also going through the partnership process, as well as taking on the role of Chairperson of Chartered Accountants Ireland Leinster Society.  I took on a lot, but there were several opportunities that presented themselves around the same time and, weighing it all up, I chose to go for them. I am lucky in that I have huge support from my family and, in particular, my husband, who had to pick up some of the slack. The role of mentoring and networking I sincerely believe that mentoring and sponsorship are key to development, and I’m glad to see so many businesses providing necessary resources and supports in these areas.  It’s important to have someone who can mentor you – someone who will tell it how it is, act as your sounding board and provide constructive criticism.  It is equally important to have a sponsor within your organisation – someone who will support you and guide you in your career development. I would encourage these relationships to be with both male and female mentors and sponsors.  It can often be helpful to have a mentor outside of your work environment to speak to about your work and personal development. Chartered Accountants Ireland provides a mentorship programme for members, which is a helpful resource. Networking can seem like a daunting task, particularly with the reopening of society post-pandemic. However, it really is never as bad as it seems.   The network of people Chartered Accountants will have from their time at university and training will be huge, and the Irish accountancy profession is particularly well-connected at home and abroad.  Try to keep this network active. You never know when you might be able to help someone, or when they might be able to help you.

The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation is just a few weeks away but is it a case of too little, too late for a fledgling market already in disarray? asks Peter McGuigan In a few weeks, the EU’s long-awaited Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) will come into force, following agreement by EU policymakers last year.  Once formally enacted into EU law, the clock will start ticking for European issuers of stablecoins and crypto asset service providers (CASPs), who will have 12 months and 18 months, respectively, to prepare for implementing the new requirements. In many ways, MiCA is another example of the EU’s determination to be at the forefront of shaping the regulatory framework for digital or data-related industries – like the EU General Data Protection Regulation – while striving to further develop its overarching policy objective of “open strategic autonomy”.  At its core, and similar in some ways to other pieces of financial regulation, MiCA aims to create a “risk-based regime” that balances consumer and investor protection, financial stability and monetary sovereignty concerns, whilst supporting innovation within the EU.   Perhaps most importantly, it will also create legal certainty for crypto providers seeking to develop their activities in the EU.  Concretely, MiCA’s objectives will be operationalised through specific rules for issuers of both unbacked crypto assets and stablecoins. These rules cover authorisation, issuance, disclosure, governance, capital and own fund requirements, to name a few. The regulation also lays down a harmonised framework concerning CASPs, such as wallets and exchanges. CASPs will now be required to seek an authorisation in the EU before they can offer their services and will have to adhere to bespoke governance and satisfy market abuse regulation.  Can MiCA stabilise the crypto market? Since the collapse of FTX in the US last year and wider crypto volatility, views continue to be split between those who argue that the industry should be prohibited or pushed to failure, and others who advocate in favour of developing robust requirements to effectively bring it under the purview of financial regulators.   The reality, as recently outlined by the Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, Gabriel Makhlouf, is that the crypto industry is not going away, and that it is therefore sensible to put in place a set of industry-specific rules designed to support innovation and protect consumers. It is, of course, difficult to determine with exact precision if MiCA could have completely prevented recent failures in the crypto market.  There is, however, a strong case to be made that it would have provided much more robust oversight and transparency for supervisors – enabling them to react and identify areas of concern much sooner.  In tandem, rules concerning the segregation of client funds and crypto assets, enhanced disclosure requirements and stricter requirements on conflicts of interest – as envisioned by MiCA – would have undoubtedly made the sector more resilient in a time of stress, and discouraged misconduct.   Despite these positive provisions, it remains to be seen whether MiCA can curtail future upheavals in the crypto market and keep pace with rapid technological innovation. Arguably, two areas will be crucial to the success of the framework:   The need for a globally co-ordinated approach to regulation so that failures in other markets are not transmitted into the EU as a result of interconnectedness; That EU policymakers are able to produce useable technical standards and guidelines to support MiCA’s application in practice.   Policymakers push for alignment Positively, at a global level, policymakers – through the Financial Stability Board and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision – are already working on producing more horizontal principles and requirements for the sector.  Last year, for example, the Basel Committee published its position on the prudential treatment of banks’ exposures to crypto assets, while discussions are also ongoing among EU policymakers about how risk weights might be assigned to the asset class before the global standards are in place.  However, whatever capital requirements are assigned within the EU, it will be crucial that they are aligned with global standards in order to preserve a level playing field.  Work on MiCA’s technical standards and guidelines is expected to begin later this year, before supervisors need to enforce the rules in mid-2024 and early 2025.  As the legislation is a regulation, it should remove most of the risk of regulatory arbitrage within the EU, but it is crucial that all Competent Authorities take a harmonised approach with respect to licensing application processes. This is especially important as existing Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), which fall under national frameworks, will need to transition to the pan-EU regime.  Comments made in May by the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s Hester Peirce acknowledge that the US risks falling behind Europe without clear crypto rules.   Ultimately, time will tell if MiCA is a success or not, but at least the EU has been the first jurisdiction globally to identify the risks and opportunities presented by the crypto asset sector. This regulation sets a solid basis on which to further build upon.  Peter McGuigan is Head of EU Affairs at the Banking & Payments Federation Ireland

In the face of rising business costs, practitioners must ensure that more SMEs avail of the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process in the months ahead, writes Graham Kenny In 1990, the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein led a ground force invasion into Kuwait. This war was to serve as an unlikely catalyst for a radical overhaul of corporate restructuring in Ireland. It set in train a clear evolutionary lineage to the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP) recently enacted under the Companies (Rescue Process for Small and Micro Companies) Act 2021. To understand this evolution, it is important to consider what actually happened in 1990. The economic effects of the invasion of Kuwait had immediate and dire consequences for Ireland.  Up to 70 percent of Larry Goodman’s Anglo Irish Beef Group exports were sent to Iraq and its customers went into immediate default.   Faced with the collapse of one of the largest employers in the State, the then Taoiseach Charles J. Haughey hastily recalled the Dáil from its summer recess and passed the Companies (Amendment) Act in August 1990.  This piece of legislation introduced examinership into the Irish statute books and, for the first time, permitted protection from creditors and the subsequent write-off of company debts.  Over the past two decades, I have been involved in many of the seminal cases of examinership across a range of sectors, including the first Supreme Court hearing of an examinership (In Re Gallium Limited [2009] IESC 2009). My experience is that examinership has served as an essential corporate restructuring tool, saving thousands of jobs through schemes of arrangement. Often, however, the costs associated with such restructuring have been cited as a disincentive for smaller companies to use the process. As a result, examinership has notionally remained the preserve of larger companies. The genesis of SCARP In February 2020, COVID-19 reached Ireland and had a devastating effect on many small businesses. In response to the threat of another financial crisis, SCARP came into force in December 2021.  This new Act is based largely on the examinership model, but notably does not require an application to court for its commencement.  Like examinership, the idea behind SCARP was to give companies breathing space from their creditors in order to implement a restructuring plan, which ordinarily included the write-off of a portion of creditors’ debts.  Before discussing the necessary role SCARP will have to play in the coming months, it is important to first undertake a brief overview of the salient features of this new corporate restructuring tool.  Who can apply? The Companies (Rescue Process for Small and Micro Companies) Act 2021 is aimed at protecting ‘small’ and ‘micro’ companies.  Small companies are defined as having an annual turnover of up to €12 million, a balance sheet of up to €6 million and up to 50 employees.  Micro companies are defined as having a turnover of up to €700,000, a balance sheet not exceeding €350,000 and up to 10 employees.  How does a company prepare for SCARP? The first step a company should take in considering the SCARP process is that the directors should prepare a statement of affairs in accordance with section 558B(4) of the Act.  The statement of affairs is accompanied by a statutory declaration that is then given to a Process Advisor. What is a Process Advisor? The Process Advisor is ordinarily an experienced insolvency practitioner who will attempt to restructure the company’s debts. It may be noted that the company’s auditor or accountant cannot act as its Process Advisor.  The Process Advisor will review the company’s statement of affairs and other financial information (as set out in Section 558C(4)) and then outline their determination as to whether the company has a “reasonable prospect of survival”.  It is important to note that a Process Advisor does not take executive powers and that the board of the company maintains full control. The Process Advisor’s fees are subject to super-preferential status over all other creditor claims. How does the rescue process commence? If the Process Advisor determines that the company does have a reasonable prospect of survival, then they will confirm this in writing to the directors of the company.  Section 558D(2) sets out that, within seven days of receipt of such confirmation, the directors shall convene a board meeting to consider whether the appointment of a Process Advisor is appropriate.  Section 558K compels the Process Advisor to notify employees, creditors and the Revenue Commissioners within five days of their appointment.  Section 558O states that creditors must acknowledge receipt of such notice within seven days and further information regarding their claim within 14 days. Can a creditor opt out of the rescue process? Section 558L provides a list of potential excludable debts. This list includes the Revenue Commissioners.  Notably, the holders of such excludable debts have 14 days to notify the Process Advisor of their intention to be excluded from the rescue plan. Such creditors must give reasons for their decision to opt out.  From anecdotal evidence, it appears that the Revenue Commissioners is largely supportive of the process and generally determined to opt in. What is a Rescue Plan? Section 558Q sets out the matters that must be incorporated into any Rescue Plan. These include: a statement of affairs; the likely outcome for creditors on a winding-up or receivership; the effect of the plan on each creditor; the reasons why the plan is fair and equitable; and  details of the Process Advisor’s remuneration. How is the Rescue Plan approved? Section 558T puts the onus on the Process Advisor to call a meeting of members and creditors as soon as is practicable after preparing the Rescue Plan.  Section 558T(4) requires that such meetings shall be fixed for a date no later than 49 days after the date on which the Process Advisor was appointed.  It is important to note that creditors must be give seven days’ notice of such meetings, so in reality the meetings must be convened no later than day 42. Section 558Y(4) sets out that a Rescue Plan shall be deemed to have been accepted by a meeting of members or creditors when 60 percent in number, representing a majority in value of the claims represented at that meeting, have voted in favour. Section 558Y(5) sets out that the Rescue Plan shall be binding on members and creditors where at least one class of impaired creditor accepts the plan and, furthermore, that 21 days have passed from the date of filing of the notice of approval in the relevant court office and no objection is filed in accordance with section 558ZC. Section 558Z requires that creditors are given notice of such approval within 48 hours. It is important to note that under section 558ZB, the Rescue Plan will not become binding on members and creditors until 21 days have elapsed from the filing of the notice of approval. What does it mean for a Process Advisor to “certify” certain liabilities?  Like examinership, the Process Advisor is given the power under section 558ZAA to certify company liabilities.  This certification means that such liabilities are treated as expenses of the Rescue Plan and therefore give such creditors a preferential status.  This provision is often used as an incentive to encourage creditors to continue to trade with the company while a Rescue Plan is formulated.  The future of SCARP Corporate restructuring requires a fine balance between competing corporate interests, employee rights and duties to creditors.  An unfortunate consequence of this complexity is that the rules governing such restructuring, whether under examinership or SCARP, can be convoluted and sometimes confusing.  But this fact alone should not deter practitioners from seeking appropriate advice and permitting struggling companies from reaping the benefits of this multifaceted legislation.  The low number of companies availing of SCARP thus far is bewildering. I would suggest that one of the main reasons for this sluggish start is simply the unfamiliarity of practitioners with the process.  The well-worn path of liquidation is regrettably often proffered by advisors before a full consideration of SCARP (or indeed examinership) is properly undertaken.  I think the main reason SCARP has not taken hold, however, is down to the extensive supports and debt warehousing that has been offered by the State.  In my experience, entrepreneurial directors live in the moment and dream of a brighter future. Directors can be reluctant to focus on the dark clouds on the horizon and are often instead consumed with an arguably unrealistic optimism. A report published by the Revenue Commissioners in March 2023 highlighted that 13,000 businesses have been expelled from the tax warehousing scheme for non-compliance and are now facing a 10 percent penalty charge.  Perhaps more worryingly, the same report shows that about 63,000 businesses still had a combined €2.2 billion tax debt in the warehousing scheme. This report also revealed that such debts owed by businesses in the scheme ranged from 19,000 businesses owing less than €100 to 6,400 owing more than €50,000. Jobs and livelihoods at stake Behind all of these abstract statistics, it is important to remember that these businesses employ 400,000 people who, in turn, have families to support.  In the face of both cost-of-living and housing crises, it appears inevitable that any rise in corporate insolvency rates would have a devastating impact on countless families within the next two years.  In light of these stark numbers, it is incumbent on practitioners across Ireland to seek the appropriate advice from corporate restructuring specialists when consulted by companies in this quagmire of historical debt.  The sooner this advice is sought and considered, the more realistic the company’s chances of survival will be. SCARP offers a vital lifeline to many struggling companies, and in the coming months, it needs to become a standard go-to option for practitioners and  their clients.  Graham Kenny is a Partner in the Dispute Resolution and Litigation Practice Group at Eversheds-Sutherland LLP

In his new role as head of PwC Ireland, Enda McDonagh wants to attract the ‘best and the brightest’ with a culture of openness and trust As the incoming Managing Partner at PwC Ireland, Enda McDonagh is busy preparing to take over in his new role from 1 July. Although still “very much in the transition phase”, McDonagh is, he says, already clear on one of the biggest priorities ahead for his four-year term at the helm of the professional services firm.  “Our people are our single most important asset. Fundamentally, our business is about people,” McDonagh says.  “What differentiates the firm in the market is the calibre and quality of our people, so attracting the next generation of leaders – the best and the brightest – will be a key focus for me.” McDonagh has been Assurance Leader with PwC Ireland for the past eight years and part of the leadership team reporting to Feargal O’Rourke, the firm’s outgoing Managing Partner.   McDonagh’s career with PwC Ireland stretches right back to 1994, however, when it was still trading as Price Waterhouse and long before the move to its current flagship premises on Dublin’s North Wall Quay. “When I walked through the doors of our old office on Wilton Place that first time, would I have thought I would be where I am now 29 years later? I don’t think I could have predicted it,” McDonagh says. “I’ve worked for one firm in that time, but I’ve had multiple careers through the roles and the experience I’ve had.  “Working closely with so many clients across different sectors has taken me from indigenous companies operating in the domestic market right through to multinationals trading in Ireland – and offering them the support mechanism they need to invest here. “Ultimately, I think I’ve gotten to where I am now by taking every opportunity that has come my way and making the conscious decision to keep learning at every stage of my career.” The team around McDonagh has also helped. “I’ve had some ‘bad hair days’, we all do, but I’ve always had that support around me, not just when I’m at my very best, but also when I’ve needed help. That’s really crucial, I think. It’s why I’m still here and why I absolutely still love it.” Of particular importance to McDonagh has been the support and guidance he has received from Feargal O’Rourke, who has been Managing Partner at PwC Ireland for the past eight years. “Feargal has been a great role model and mentor to me,” he says. “His support and enthusiasm for our people and the business over the years has been unrelenting. I have really valued his leadership and would like to wish him every success in his next chapter.” As the new Managing Partner at PwC Ireland, McDonagh will lead a firm with national reach extending to 3,000 people in Dublin, Cork, Galway, Kilkenny, Limerick, Waterford and Wexford.    It will be far from a solo endeavour, however. “One of the most important tasks right now for me is assembling the leadership team I will work with over the next four years.  “One of our core values at PwC Ireland is that we work together as a team and this extends right through to me and how I work with the team around me,” he says. “Everything we achieve, we achieve as a team. No one person ever has the monopoly on good ideas. Equally, no one should ever be in a situation where they are left on their own to try to solve a problem, or to figure something out.  “You absolutely have to support people and give them the space to understand what they want from their career and what they need to grow as professionals, and as people.  “They can only really do that if they know and trust that they are in an environment in which it is okay to make mistakes.” A Partner with PwC since 2006, McDonagh held the role of Assurance People Partner for four years before he was appointed Assurance Leader in 2015. It was this role that gave him his first real insight into the strategic value of good people management and meaningful employee engagement. “I learned so much in those four years about how to make sure that all aspects of how you engage your people is as it should be, both operationally and from a management perspective,” he says.  “It’s really about how they experience the firm from recruitment through all the stages in their career, and making sure that what we are giving them is rewarding and exciting. That is enormously important.” McDonagh’s own interest in accountancy as a career took root when he attended Templeogue College in Southwest Dublin. “I had a tremendous accounting teacher who really kindled my interest and, after I did the Leaving Cert, I went on to study Commerce at UCD followed by the Master of Accounting at UCD Smurfit School.” He joined PwC Ireland, then Price Waterhouse, in 1994 while still studying for his master’s. “We hadn’t yet merged with Coopers & Lybrand at that stage to become PwC Ireland, so I’m really one of the dinosaurs here,” he says. In the years since, McDonagh’s career has centred mainly on large-scale listed Irish companies and multinational corporations. “From a business perspective, I’ve always worked in the non-financial services part of the practice,” he says.  “What we’ve called this has changed more times than I can tell you over the years, but, essentially, my focus has been on big companies in sectors like manufacturing, industrial products, pharmaceuticals, life sciences and food.” Although he has spent much of his working life with PwC in Ireland, McDonagh recalls a three-year stint with the firm’s Boston office in the early 2000s as a particularly important period in his career. “That time was really key for me in terms of the lessons I learned and how important they have been to me since,” he says.  “I moved to Boston as a manager and then became a senior manager over there. I think, for many of us, when you take yourself outside your own comfort zone, you learn the most. “For me, moving to Boston was like starting again. I didn’t know anyone. I didn’t have any connections in the city. “In that situation, you have to build your brand and reputation from ground zero, and in a much bigger market. It was a challenge, but one I loved and learned a huge amount from. “People are much more direct in business in the US, so you very quickly form a thicker skin. As my career has progressed in the years since, that resilience has stood to me.  “At the same time, I made some lifelong friendships professionally and personally with my PwC colleagues in the US, but also with people at the companies I worked with.  “Those relationships have stood me in good stead because Ireland as an economy has such a vibrant trading relationship with the US. Having experience and connections there is very helpful.” Now, as companies in Ireland, the US and elsewhere grapple with a fresh set of challenges post-pandemic, McDonagh is seeing a “singular view” emerging in boardrooms around the country.  “It’s an interesting time. The global economy is clearly softer now than it has been for some time and, as we know, there are multiple elements to this. “There are the rising interest rates, inflation, the cost of doing business, and the general economic outlook, which is far from clear. “Everyone is facing these challenges but there is also something else that is very much front-of-mind now in the boardroom and that is the pace of technological change. “There has been this sudden acceleration in the development of technologies like Artificial Intelligence, and that means that many companies are looking ahead to a pretty demanding change agenda no matter what sector they operate in.” This change will bring opportunity as well as challenge. “The positive here is that companies are able to see beyond current challenges, and they are thinking about how to position themselves for the opportunities that lie beyond,” says McDonagh. “And from an Irish perspective, economically we are certainly in much better shape than we were at the time of the global financial crisis.  “We have strong fiscal returns, and we still have good investment trade flows into Ireland. This tells me that we have the capacity to weather the storm and navigate the headwinds coming at us.”