“Auto Enrolment has been talked about for decades – now it is finally happening.” The words of Social Protection Minister Heather Humphreys after the Automatic Enrolment Retirement Savings System Bill passed through the Houses of the Oireachtas. Ireland is one step closer to catching up with every other OECD country that already has some form of auto-enrolment. It might be finally happening, but when is less clear. Momentum is needed to avoid the work of the last two decades being squandered. Two-thirds of Chartered Accountants Ireland’s members work in business, many of whom will be required to put such a scheme in place for their employees. The most recent formal communication from government suggests a start date sometime in 2025. And yet, putting in place the infrastructure to facilitate a system of pensions auto-enrolment is a mammoth task, and the list of outstanding deliverables at Department level is concerning before it even comes time for businesses to act. Hurdles to clear The legislative hurdle has now been cleared, but the Department of Social Protection has only in recent weeks appointed a company to build and run the new system. We are encouraged to see they have chosen a company that has a record of success in building the UK equivalent. We urge the Department to now expedite the appointment of a firm to manage the underlying investments. In recent weeks, it was reported that the Department of Finance has raised concerns that the auto enrolment legislation has been framed in a way that will force the regulator to apply a lower standard of oversight than that imposed on firms in the private pensions market. Other details also need to be clarified. In recent months, this Institute has requested such clarity in several areas. Many employers with staff who are likely to come within the remit of auto-enrolment will already have occupational pension schemes in place. To avoid the administrative complexity of setting up and operating a second staff pension scheme under auto enrolment, such employers may instead offer to extend participation in their current pension scheme to currently non-pensionable employees. However, if even just one of these employees refused to join the staff scheme in favour of being automatically enrolled, the employer would still be compelled to undertake the cost of setting up and operating a second scheme. We also sought more information around the meaning of “employee”, defined in the legislation as “a person in receipt of emoluments”. Such a definition would extend to individuals already in full-time pensionable employment who also undertake additional work who will therefore be required to contribute to a second pension scheme. Communication is going to be key The government’s recent SME package put a premium on the importance of consultation and dialogue with SMEs and other groups before introducing new legislation or policy affecting them. Auto enrolment is an opportunity to put this into practice. The government now needs to publish a road map and stick to it. While feedback was invited as part of an initial public consultation in 2018, since then only a very basic four-page guidance note for employers has been issued by government. To gain and maintain momentum, extensive and continuous stakeholder engagement is needed - not least with employers and payroll providers, upon whom the successful operation of the new system will be largely dependent. In a survey of small businesses conducted by Chartered Accountants Ireland, almost 90% felt that businesses had not been adequately informed of the steps needed to be taken by them to comply with pensions auto-enrolment in time for an early 2025 start date. Interestingly, three quarters of those surveyed will be required to introduce the new pension scheme, and for many this will be alongside their existing occupational pensions. Businesses need to see what the journey to implementation will look like. In a high-cost environment, this will give much needed reassurance and help to allay concerns. What is a realistic timeline? In its pre-legislative scrutiny report on the Bill introducing auto-enrolment, the Joint Committee on Social Protection recommended a two-year lead-in period, following the Bill being signed into law, to allow sufficient time for implementation. Payroll providers have been consistent in highlighting the need for an initial pilot phase to facilitate testing of the new system and to allow sufficient time to assimilate auto enrolment with current payroll systems. Neither of these fit into a 2025 implementation timeline. If officials truly want auto-enrolment to be a success, this timeline should be revisited and a 2026 or beyond start date announced. They may wish to avoid yet another postponement to the launch of auto enrolment but what should really matter here is getting it done right and giving businesses a chance to adapt. This additional time needs to be wisely used, by facilitating ongoing dialogue between departments, third party partners in implementation, and the many business groups and stakeholders who have walked this long road to auto enrolment.

In an era of digital surveillance, employees resort to performative tactics like "mouse shuffling." True productivity thrives on trust, communication, and effective people management—not monitoring, writes Moira Dunne Have you heard of the ‘mouse shuffle’ or coffee badging’ or ‘productivity theatre’ yet? These terms refer to tactics used by employees to show that they are working hard. Why? Because they work in companies where surveillance tools are used to monitor performance. Where working visibility is valued more than actual productivity. Monitoring our employees A recent Forbes survey found that 43 percent of American employees say their online activity is being monitored in 2024. What are we doing? Why are we monitoring people and using surveillance tools? Where did it all go wrong? As a Productivity Consultant passionate about helping businesses improve by achieving productivity through employee motivation, engagement and empowerment, reading about performative tactics, surveillance and mistrust sadden me greatly. When and, perhaps more importantly, why did employers revert to such old-school thinking –  that being seen equals working hard? Of course, the shift to remote working since the pandemic has changed how we work, but matching that with intelligent thinking and planning will help us understand the implications of that change. Leaders should consider adopting an ‘old-school’ strategy to boost productivity – good old-fashioned people management! This involves communication, building one-to-one relationships, providing clear goals and direction, setting weekly targets, empowering people, and providing constructive feedback and training. Productivity tools Managers and team leaders have a key role in enabling productivity. Many of the barriers can be reduced or removed by good communication, clarity and allowing people to protect time for their priority work. Empowering employees is key to their productivity and well-being, and by providing tools to aid their productivity, you show your team that you’re all in this together, trusting them to achieve the organisation’s goals. Here are five ways to help employees feel empowered and productive: Reduce meetings and improve decisions, actions and follow-up; Put a smart email practice in place so less time is spent on email each day; Agree on team and individual priorities and plans every week; Identify distractions within the team (such as other departments taking resources, etc) and work to reduce them; and Minimise time spent on low-value activities. You need to work with your team to identify any productivity barriers and stress factors. Good people management We don’t need heavy-handed monitoring tools to manage our employees. We need human connection, leadership and to learn to trust our employees when they aren’t in our immediate eyeline. In his Forbes article about mouse shuffling, organisational consultant David Campbell stresses that only when companies start trusting employees more and focus on the work they produce—not on how much they seem to be working—will trends like the ‘mouse shuffle’ fade away. He predicts that better work-life balance and happier employees would be the result. “Businesses should measure success by results, not by how much time someone seems to be working,” Campbell advises. “They should trust employees to manage their time and focus on achieving their goals, rather than simply being online all the time.” Moira Dunne is Founder of beproductive.ie

As the global economy faces constrained growth, high inflation, and regulatory pressures, the food industry must adapt to rising costs, technological disruptions, and geopolitical volatility, says Brian MacSweeney The 2024 economic outlook paints a mixed picture. Constrained growth across the leading economies, stubbornly high inflation, and slowness to ease the tightened monetary policy cycle mean industries are facing challenging operating environments. The food industry is no different and its relationship with these macro-economic factors is complex. For many years, the developed world has generally had a stable supply of cheap high-quality food. Recently, the status quo has been challenged. Brexit, war, labour shortages, supply chain disruption, regulation and climate change mean that the complex interlinkage will continue, but it will be more volatile than stable. Here are some of the global micro-trends and the impact they are having on the food and beverage sector. Labour availability and cost The current global labour trend is marked by shortages and increased costs. This has a ripple effect, slowing food production and distribution, and ultimately increasing the price of food. An example is the recent minimum wage increase in California for fast-food workers. This was an important step towards better living standards for workers, but the corollary is higher food prices. Fast food prices across chains in California are increasing. At a time of higher inflation, this disproportionately affects cohorts from socially disadvantaged backgrounds which is a key trend globally in the industry.  Commodity prices and inflation The FAO Food Price Index (FFPI) for June 2024 stood at 120.6 points. To put this into perspective, the FFPI averaged 125.7 points in 2021, which was a 28.1 percent increase over 2020. Therefore, the current FFPI is lower than the average for 2021, but it is still relatively high compared to historical standards. This is driven by various macroeconomic factors including climate. The poor cocoa harvest in Ghana and Ivory Coast has caused cocoa prices to spike. Coffee, too, has experienced a similar fate, with futures of coffee spiking due to heatwaves affecting major producers in South-East Asia. While we await general inflation to subside due to continuing government interest rate intervention, events like climate keep food prices elevated.  Policy and regulation Europe leads the way when it comes to the regulation of food where labelling, nitrate levels, flavour use, and unfair trade practices all have been legislated over the last number of years. The introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in the EU is having a transformative effect. While regulation means well, it can impact food yield and cost. In terms of price, not every government is explicitly regulating food prices, but because the cost of food is one of the clear ways the population sees inflation impacting their wallets, governments are intervening because they want the price of food kept flat or even reduced. Recently, the Canadian Prime Minister summoned CEOs of Canada’s five largest retailers and gave them a deadline to reduce the price of food, warning they would be subject to heavier regulation if they didn’t comply. Similar conversations are happening in various jurisdictions around the world, putting real pressure on the margins and cash flow.  Geo-politics Geopolitical instability, particularly war, has a profound impact on consumers and producers alike. For example, the impact of Brexit on food availability in the UK and the effect of the war in Ukraine on grain prices are well documented. The simple diversion of shipping from the Strait of Hormuz because of Houthi attacks that disrupt vital shipping routes to around the Horn of Africa has added days to supply chains and cost increases for consumers. These events are becoming more frequent making outlooks more unpredictable.  Disruption and technological advancement The pace of technological advancement is a significant challenge but also an enormous opportunity. AI and weight suppressing medications are key emerging disruptors. AI can significantly impact the value chain right from crop yield monitoring to customer experience. Weight loss drugs, such as Wegovy and Ozempic are not widely available in Ireland, but the pipeline of new alternatives including orally ingested drugs may alter consumer eating habits and food preferences, leading to a decrease in the consumption of high-calorie snacks and fast food. This disruption is a prominent agenda item for the boards considering their product offerings and strategies.  Optimism and opportunity Despite the challenging macro environment, we are beginning to see an easing of inflationary pressures due to the tight monetary policies pursued by central banks around the world. As inflation calms, monetary policy and interest rates will fall. This will drive a renewed consumer demand which will stimulate economic growth. The food industry is well-versed in managing economic cycles and has always been resilient and adaptable. It has consistently demonstrated its ability to evolve through challenges and changes over the years. During this period, there is huge opportunity for the Irish food industry. Already, Ireland is leading the way in sustainability. The acquisition profile of our companies is strategic and niche in sectors like food preservation, for example. The integration between food and energy companies is becoming more pronounced, with solar farms emerging alongside food plants and ongoing trials for bio-methane production – this is to solve the emissions problem. Moreover, our universities are spearheading cutting-edge research and fostering strong industry collaborations. While the landscape presents its challenges, it also offers great opportunities. As always, the future holds promise and potential for those ready to adapt.  Brian MacSweeney is a Audit Partner at KPMG

Despite severe economic challenges, Northern Ireland has avoided the wave of corporate failures seen in England and Wales, though future risks remain uncertain, writes Gareth Latimer Since the onset of the global pandemic in March 2020, assessing the restructuring market has become increasingly important. This is evident by the recent publication of The Northern Ireland Labour Market Report and The Company Insolvency Statistics for Northern Ireland, which gives a detailed analysis of redundancies and insolvencies in Northern Ireland. Below, we discuss what this trend could mean. Redundancies and insolvencies in Northern Ireland Published in July this year, The Northern Ireland Labour Market Report has put the annual number of confirmed redundancies in Northern Ireland up to June 2024 at 2,560 – almost double the figure for the previous year (1,340). Similarly, The Company Insolvency Statistics for Northern Ireland for June 2024 highlighted 17 corporate insolvencies in June 2024, which was 13 percent higher than in June 2023. Understanding the statistics As with any statistics, we must delve beyond the headlines to see their impact on the Northern Ireland market. The raw numbers tell one story, but the underlying trends and their broader implications reveal much more about our economic landscape. Initial predictions and government intervention When the COVID-19 pandemic hit the UK in March 2020, some commentators predicted a ‘tsunami of corporate failures and mass redundancies’. Thanks to the introduction of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, commonly known as the Furlough Scheme, the predicted large number of redundancies did not occur. Additional liquidity measures Several other liquidity measures, including the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) and the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) also played their part in staving off the large number of corporate failures many had predicted. Financial lifelines, in the form of loans and grants, were available to allow companies to survive the various lockdowns and the unprecedented drop in GDP in April and June 2020. However, having recovered from the economic effects of the pandemic, we then had the Russia-Ukraine war and the subsequent energy crisis. High inflation and interest rates followed. It is no wonder, then, that companies have been struggling. New insolvency procedures To help companies facing insolvency, two new procedures were created when The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, which also applied to Northern Ireland, was implemented. Company moratorium: Designed to give struggling businesses formal breathing space in which to explore rescue and restructuring options, free from creditor and other legal action. Except in certain circumstances, insolvency proceedings cannot be instigated against a company during the moratorium period. Restructuring plans: Introduced to support viable companies struggling with unmanageable debt obligations. These plans allow the court to sanction a plan that binds creditors to a structuring plan if it is deemed fair and equitable. Creditors vote on the plan, but the court can impose it on dissenting classes of creditors (cram down) if the necessary conditions are met. However, despite the introduction of these new procedures, between 26 June 2020 and 30 June 2024, there was only one moratorium in Northern Ireland and no restructuring plans. The figures suggest that these options may hold less relevance for the Northern Ireland market compared to more traditional restructuring options. Labour market report insights One might have expected the Northern Ireland Labour Market Report to paint a bleak picture. The UK economy slipped into a mild recession in 2023, and the cost of living crisis continues. However, the anticipated surge in redundancies due to corporate failures has not materialised.  In fact, the unemployment rate in Northern Ireland for March to May 2024 fell over the quarter and the year to 2 percent. It is useful here to analyse and compare the June 2024 insolvency statistics. Northern Ireland saw 17 company insolvencies. And while each of these cases demonstrates financial distress for the company and employees involved, considering the economic backdrop, one might have anticipated a higher number of corporate failures. Indeed, this picture contrasts sharply with the headline insolvency statistics from England and Wales, where registered company insolvencies in June 2024 reached 2,361 – 16 percent higher than in May 2024 and 17 percent higher June 2023. The number of company insolvencies in England and Wales have remained much higher than those seen both during the COVID-19 pandemic and between 2014 and 2019. The disparity suggests that Northern Ireland’s insolvency rate is proportionately lower than that of England and Wales. Whether this resilience will hold, or if the rising tide of corporate failures in England and Wales will eventually reach these shores, remains to be seen. Future outlook with new government Given the recent Labour Party landslide victory in the UK, many are wondering how this shift will impact corporate failures and job redundancies. The new Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is poised to play a crucial role. A former Bank of England employee, Reeves has continually stressed the importance of fiscal discipline, and given the current state of public finances, she may have no choice. It appears that the economic strategy is to grow the economy, and this will improve the Treasury coffers; easy to say but harder to deliver. The future It seems that in 2024, Northern Ireland has been somewhat insulated from the wave of corporate failures sweeping through England and Wales. While specific factors contribute to this relative calm, the recent reports suggest that, despite ongoing economic pressures, we’ve seen more of a ripple than a tsunami of insolvencies. Thankfully, the anticipated surge in corporate failures has not materialised. Clearly, this is positive news for the economy. Yet, with the recent economic headwinds, one can’t help but wonder if we are simply delaying the inevitable. Will 2025 finally bring the wave of corporate failures some have been expecting? Only time will tell. Gareth Latimer is a Director at Grant Thornton NI

Fractional executives can bring genuine value to business leaders, offering specialised knowledge and niche experience on a flexible basis, writes Tony Dignam The business landscape has undergone significant transformation in recent years, driven by advances in technology, economic shifts and evolving work patterns.  One notable trend that has emerged is the rise of the fractional executive. These seasoned professionals offer their expertise to multiple companies on a part-time or “fractional” basis, providing strategic leadership without the commitment of a full-time role.  What is a fractional executive?  A fractional executive is an experienced leader who offer their services to businesses on a flexible basis as and when needed.  They can occupy various roles such as Chief Finance Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, Chief Technology Officer, and more.  These professionals can bring a wealth of experience and specialised skills to the table, helping companies navigate complex challenges and phases of growth or change.  Benefits of the fractional executive The concept of a fractional executive is not entirely new, but it has gained significant traction in recent years.  Economic uncertainties and the need for cost-effective solutions have driven many businesses to reconsider traditional employment models.  Hiring a full-time executive can mean a substantial overhead, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises that may not have the budget for high salaries and benefits packages.   Fractional executives offer a more affordable alternative, potentially allowing companies to access top-tier talent “on demand”.  The gig economy has revolutionised the way people work, with a particular emphasis on flexibility and project-based engagements.  Fractional executives fit perfectly into this model, offering their expertise for specific projects, limited periods or ongoing for an agreed number of days per week or per month.  This flexibility benefits both the executive, who enjoys diverse work experiences, and the company they work with, which can tap into specialised skills as needed.   Access to specialised expertise  Fractional executives often have broad subject matter expertise and plenty of relevant experience they can bring to the table and fast. Many will have held senior positions in their field and possess a deep understanding of best practices in their industry.  This knowledge can be invaluable for businesses looking to implement strategic initiatives or navigate complex change or growth.  Flexibility and scalability  One of the main advantages of fractional executives is their flexibility. Companies can engage them for specific projects, short-term needs, or on an ongoing fractional basis.  This scalability can give businesses more scope to adjust their executive resources according to their existing needs without long-term commitments.  Cost-effective leadership  Hiring a full-time executive can be a significant financial burden, especially for smaller companies. Fractional executives can offer a cost-effective alternative, potentially providing access to top-tier leadership at a lower cost.  This financial efficiency can be crucial for start-ups and SMEs operating on tight budgets, or for employers for whom long-term senior executive needs are harder to forecast.  Fresh perspectives  Fractional executives often work with multiple companies across different industries. This diverse experience means they can bring fresh and innovative perspectives to the businesses they serve.  Their ability to think outside the box can help companies to overcome challenges and seize new opportunities.  These executives sometimes also bring the benefit of fresh contacts and networks to senior teams, which can add value to scaling businesses. This means that the fractional executives can support and enhance business leadership by offering specialised expertise on a flexible, cost-effective basis.  Tony Dignam, FCA, is Managing Director of The Agile Executive

Embracing failure as a learning opportunity can drive innovation, turning business setbacks into strengths and fostering growth, writes Joanne Powell One of the challenges of innovation, advancement and continuous improvement is that sometimes getting it wrong is inevitable. No one likes to fail. We’re naturally predisposed to want to achieve and do better. Whether in life or in business, innovation, advancement and achievement are key markers of success. Traditionally, failure is either not an option or it is perceived as a sign of weakness. There is a growing body of thought that challenges traditional perspectives on failure, however. Business leadership author Simon Sinek talks about “falling” rather than “failure” – i.e. because you can get up from a fall and move forward. Amy Edmondson, Professor of Leadership at Harvard Business School, has written extensively on the notion that it “…doesn’t matter if you fail. It matters how you fail”. New York Times bestselling author, John C Maxwell, has noted that, “the difference between average people and achieving people is their perception of and response to failure.” There are any number of articles from Forbes, HBR and other notable journals in a similar vein. The key message is that failure can be a very positive catalyst for success – but only if done well. Doing failure ‘well’ means seeing it as a key part of the process: a chance to learn, to reflect and to move forward. It can also help to see lessons learned from failure as part of the inevitable tapestry of life. One of the ways I practice this myself is through inspiration from Mary Wallace, the Irish artist. Her popular Precious Bowls series is inspired by two Japanese concepts: Kintsugi: using gold or other precious metal to repair broken pottery. Wabi-sabi: seeing beauty in imperfection. For me, ideas around learning from failure really come together with the concept of wabi-sabi and the idea of “beauty in imperfection”. Some sources translate the concept of wabi-sabi as “nothing is perfect”, which is considered to be inherently positive as it suggests that there is always potential for 'more'. Kintsugi is an equally wonderful tradition, as it treats flaws and imperfections as part of the history of an object rather than something to be disguised or hidden. In the context of business, this can provide a constructive lens through which to process “failure” and to see the final product (or latest iteration) as being stronger and even more precious because of the journey it has travelled. I keep one of the Mary Wallace ‘Precious Bowls’ prints over my office desk. Every time I look at it, I’m reminded of three key principles: Every project or strategy has potential – The ethos behind any project or strategy should be one of continuous improvement. You must recognise that nothing is perfect and, instead, optimise the potential available. The ability to innovate and remain agile and open to change is key. Innovation requires us to take calculated risks and be open to the prospect of failure. It is knowing and understanding that sometimes we get it “wrong”, that strategies and innovations don't always produce the desired impacts. Wabi-sabi reminds me to take time to reflect and learn from “failure”, and to produce something better. Create and encourage strong, trust-filled and (psychologically) safe organisations. By creating a culture where stakeholders are encouraged to reflect and to find ways to improve, we are, in a way, creating our own version of kintsugi, where failure is recognised as an inevitable side-effect of any organisation that values innovation and progress. It is how we respond to these “failures” that matters most. Joanne Powell is Head of Advisor Services at QED: The Accreditation Experts

Advocating for yourself at work is vital, especially if you're a neurodivergent person. Antje Derks explains how to navigate workplace challenges and secure the support you need Advocating for yourself in the workplace can be challenging for anyone, but it can be especially daunting for those who are neurodivergent. Neurodivergence encompasses a range of conditions, including autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia and other cognitive differences that affect how individuals think, learn and interact with the world. While these differences can bring unique strengths to the workplace, they can also create specific needs and challenges. Understanding how to ask for reasonable accommodations and advocate for yourself is crucial for thriving in your professional environment. Neurodivergent individuals often have distinct ways of processing information, communicating and completing tasks. These differences can be assets, bringing innovative perspectives and problem-solving skills to a team. The traditional workplace environment may not always be conducive to neurodivergent work styles, however, leading to potential misunderstandings and obstacles. Workplace challenges Neurodivergent individuals often face specific challenges in the workplace. Sensory sensitivities, such as noise, lighting or office layouts, can overwhelm a neurodivergent brain, leading to overstimulation. Organisational and time management difficulties can also arise, as can challenges with social interactions and communication. Many neurodivergent colleagues appreciate clear, explicit instructions and feedback. The more precise and direct the language, the better. While this approach works well for many, it's important to remember that neurodivergence varies greatly from person to person. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Self-advocacy Self-advocacy involves understanding your own needs and communicating them effectively to others. For neurodivergent individuals, self-advocacy is essential for creating a work environment that supports their success. Here are key steps to advocate for yourself effectively. Familiarise yourself with workplace policies and legal protections related to disabilities In many countries, laws provide the right to reasonable accommodations. Take time to reflect on your specific needs and how certain accommodations can help you perform your job better. This might include flexible work hours, noise-cancelling headphones or written instructions for tasks. Schedule a meeting with your manager or HR representative to discuss your needs. Prepare to explain your neurodivergence in a way that highlights both your strengths and the challenges you face. Remember to use clear and specific language when requesting accommodations. For example, instead of saying, "I need a quieter workspace," you might say, "I need a desk in a quieter area of the office to help me concentrate better." It is important to try and frame your requests in a way that shows you are looking for solutions that benefit both you and the company. Emphasise how the adjustments will help you to be more productive and contribute effectively to the team by suggesting reasonable accommodations that are specific and actionable. For example, "Can I have a standing desk to help me stay focused?" or "Can we have a weekly check-in meeting to ensure I am on track with my projects?" will show your manager that you are actively seeking to take responsibility for yourself rather than shifting all the expectation on to them. Make reasonable adjustments depending on your needs Reasonable adjustments vary depending on individual needs and job requirements. Flexible work arrangements, such as remote work, flexible hours or modified schedules, can help manage sensory overload and align work with peak productivity times. Assistive technology, including speech-to-text software, organisational apps or noise-cancelling headphones, can aid concentration and efficiency. Physical workspace adjustments, like a quieter workspace, a standing desk or specific lighting, can create a more comfortable and productive environment. Structured communication, with clear, written instructions and regular feedback, ensures understanding and proper task execution, while regular check-ins can provide ongoing support and clarification. Additionally, access to a mentor or job coach who understands neurodiversity can offer valuable support and guidance. Monitor the effectiveness of the adjustments Communicate with your manager or HR about how well (or not) the adjustments are working for you. If things need tweaking slightly, don't hesitate to request them. Keep records Keep a record of your communications and any agreements made. This documentation can be helpful if you need to revisit the discussion or if there are any disputes. Promoting an inclusive workplace culture Advocating for yourself is an important step, but fostering a more inclusive workplace culture requires broader efforts from the whole organisation. Employers and colleagues can contribute by promoting awareness and understanding of neurodiversity through training and education, as well as encouraging open dialogue about individual needs and adjustments. But most importantly, it is about helping to create a supportive environment where all employees feel valued and included – whether they’re neurodivergent or not. By advocating for yourself and working towards a more inclusive workplace, you can not only enhance your own job satisfaction and performance but also contribute to a diverse and dynamic work environment where everyone's unique strengths are recognised and valued. Antje Derks is a Marketing Executive with Chartered Accountants Worldwide

Further to the notice in our most recent Regulatory Bulletin regarding proposed changes to the Institute’s Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) requirements, these changes have now been approved by the Professional Standards Board and revised Public Practice Regulations will come into effect on 1 September 2024.  The revised Public Practice Regulations will be available on the Professional Standards website from 1 September 2024. Main changes The main changes to the PII requirements are as follows: The minimum limit of indemnity will increase from €2.14m (£1.5m) to €2.34m (£2m). For firms with a gross fee income which is below €936,000 (£800,000), the minimum limit will be two and a half times the firm’s gross fee income, subject to a minimum of €290,000 (£250,000) (this is an increase from €142,000 or £100,000). Larger firms with gross fee income over €58.5m (£50m) will not be required to put in place ‘qualifying insurance’ but must have in place appropriate arrangements which will be monitored. (Currently this approach is available to firms with 50+ principals.) For firms that will be required to put qualifying insurance in place, the maximum aggregate excess should not exceed the higher of €3,500 (£3,000) or 3% of a firm’s gross fee income. Firms insuring in a group arrangement can be treated as single entity for the purposes of the regulations providing that certain criteria are met.  Firms in the structure can: (a) demonstrate common ownership, control or management; and (b) can demonstrate that they are aimed at co-operation, and (c) meet at least one or more of the following criteria: ·        the firms within the structure are clearly aimed at profit or cost sharing; ·        the firms within the structure share common quality control policies and procedures; ·        the firms within the structure share a common business strategy; ·        the firms within the structure share the use of a common brand-name; ·        the firms within the structure share a significant part of professional resources. Firms continue to be required to have run off cover in place for the first two years after cessation.  Firms should then take “all reasonable steps” to put run off cover in place for a further four years. The existing additional PII requirements for firms licensed under the Designated Professional Body Handbook or authorised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority to conduct insurance distribution activities (extant Public Practice Regulation 7.18) and firms authorised under the Investment Business Regulations (excluding firms that perform referral only business) (extant Public Practice Regulation 7.18A) continue to apply and are unchanged at this time.  Firms within the scope of 7.18A can however expect increases to the prescribed limits for policies renewing on or after 1 January 2025.  Firms will receive further information on these changes in due course. Timeline There will be a transitional period and the new requirements relating to minimum limits and excess will only apply to new policies once a firm renews its PII after 1 September 2024.  These new requirements will therefore apply to all firms from 1 September 2025.  Preparing for the changes In view of the changes, it is more important than ever for firms to engage early with their broker to identify if any changes will need to be made to the policy at next renewal, work out the relevant level of cover needed going forward, as well as carrying out the usual risk assessment. Members or firms who have any queries in relation to these changes should email professionalstandards@charteredaccountants.ie

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions A long-standing member of my team works to a good standard, but does the bare minimum. She is retiring soon. She takes no part in social outings and at team meetings, both in person and online, she works on her computer, only lifting her head to respond to direct questions. I have new people joining the team soon and I don’t want her muddying the water. I’m afraid if I tackle this, she will ‘go sick’. She has done this before. My team is under huge and growing pressure. A. It is so easy to feel undermined by one person, so pay close attention to where your energy goes. It’s essential to prioritise creating a positive experience for your new joiners as well as the rest of the team.  During interviews, induction and early reviews with your new team members, communicate this by organising a team lunch, bringing treats to meetings or refreshing the team meeting format. Also, take a look at the agenda: What is discussed? Who gets to talk, present, discuss or consult?  If you decide to deal directly with the issue, remember her behaviour has evolved for a reason and, in her head, makes perfect sense. Whether it’s discomfort, disrespect, payback or self-protection, there is a message in her behaviour. It could be interesting to find out why she seems disinterested in engaging with the team.  You need to be genuinely curious – this can be hard when you feel undermined and anxious. It’s possible the team member may need help getting back into the group. Consider pairing her up with someone on a project, asking her to train a new team member, or finding ways to acknowledge her long service and experience. If you decide to discuss this with her, start with the context (which you have outlined in your question): she is retiring soon, new people are starting and pressure is growing.  For those reasons, you need everyone to be fully present to onboard new joiners, deal with important issues and prepare for the future. This means putting the work away for a while.  You can be firm, gentle and respectful in this conversation. She may give you a range of reasons for her behaviour – for example, she’s too busy, the meeting takes too long, it’s not interesting, it doesn’t concern her or she knows all this stuff already.  Don’t argue with her. Agree and go back to your request: “I know you are busy but I need you there. So, how can we make it a more useful meeting?”   Be sure to have an exit strategy ready to avoid going round in circles.  The request you are making to this long-serving team member is reasonable. If you receive an outright refusal, the stakes get very high (and we are firmly in ‘going sick’ territory).  Consider your options: Do you stick with the status quo? Insist she engages with the team? Ask her not to attend team meetings if she can’t pay attention?   Telling her, “I’d rather have you there than not there, but I’d really appreciate it if you were fully present,” might be the safest option and keeps the door open. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant with Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and  team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie

The ethical use of AI and how it is governed today and as it continues to evolve in the years ahead is top of mind for many in the profession. Accountancy Ireland asks three Chartered Accountants for their take on the ethics of AI Owen Lewis  Head of AI and Management Consulting KPMG in Ireland It is crucial for all of us in the profession to ensure the integrity and transparency of solutions driven by artificial intelligence (AI).  We must audit and validate AI algorithms to ensure they comply with regulatory standards and ethical guidelines. Monitoring systems for biases and inaccuracies is also crucial to ensuring that financial data and decisions remain fair and reliable. By providing independent oversight, we can help to maintain trust in AI-driven financial processes and outcomes for clients.  Where AI is used to inform large-scale decisions, it should be supplemented with significant governance measures, such as explainability, transparency, human oversight, data quality and model robustness and performance requirements. This technology is continuing to advance rapidly, and we need to be open to both its current and potential capabilities.  By putting the correct governance mechanisms and controls in place – beginning with low-risk test applications and building from there – organisations can adopt AI safely and obtain real benefits from its use. I am working with organisations to help them think through what AI means for them, develop strategies for its adoption, put the necessary governance and controls in place, scale solutions sensibly and ensure business leaders get real value from their investment.  Whatever their goal may be – more efficient operations, accelerated content generation or improved engagement with stakeholders – we help organisations decide if AI can help, and if it can, how to use it in the right way. >Bob Semple Experienced Director Governance and Risk Management Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most misunderstood, yet transformative, technologies impacting the way we work today. Here are 10 essential steps Chartered Accountants should take to navigate the landscape of AI effectively. Take a leadership role – If we don’t take the lead, we risk missing the golden opportunity AI presents. Conduct an AI “stocktake” –According to a recent Microsoft survey, 75 percent of employees are already using AI. Identifying current AI usage within your organisation is essential. Assess the downside risks of AI – Legislative and regulatory requirements are exploding (e.g. NIS 2, the AI Act, DORA and more) and risks abound (AI bias, explainability, privacy, IP, GDPR, cyber security, resilience, misuse, model drift and more). Organisations must act on their AI responsibilities. Conduct a dataset stocktake – Just as the Y2K challenge was about identifying IT systems, today’s challenge is to catalogue all datasets, as these are crucial for AI functionality. Draft appropriate policies and procedures – Establish clear responsibilities and accountability for AI initiatives. Pay special attention to how AI impacts decision-making processes. Strengthen data curation – Implement new processes to improve how data is collected and used. Identify opportunities for the smart use of AI – Brainstorm and prioritise AI use-cases that can drive efficiency and innovation. Provide training – Ensure that board members, management and staff are all adequately trained on AI principles and applications. Manage the realisation of benefits – Safeguard against excessive costs and subpar returns by carefully managing the implementation of AI projects. Update audit and assurance approaches – Seek independent assurance on AI applications and leverage AI to enhance risk, control and audit processes. As we adopt AI, it is critical that we pay particular attention to distorted agency – i.e. giving too much agency to, or relying unduly on, AI outputs and doubting our own agency to make the most important decisions. Exercising professional judgement is the key to minimising the risks associated with AI and realising its benefits, and that surely is the strength of every Chartered Accountant. *Note: GPT4 was used to assist in drafting this article.   Níall Fitzgerald Head of Ethics and Governance Chartered Accountants Ireland Artificial intelligence (AI) is proving to be transformative, impacting competitiveness and how business is done.  Chartered Accountants Ireland has engaged with members working in various finance and C-suite positions, including chief executives, chief financial officers and board members, to understand how AI is impacting their day-to-day work.  One thing is clear. AI is being used in some shape or form in many businesses across the country.  In 2023, the Institute’s response to the UK’s Financial Reporting Council proposals on introducing governance requirements for the use of AI noted several governance mechanisms that are likely to be impacted by AI currently or in the very near future in many organisations.  We highlighted the focus on corporate purpose and how market forces, emerging threats and opportunities driven by AI, may challenge the purpose of an organisation and its long-term objectives.  AI may impact how organisations decide on their strategic focus in terms of how they deliver their product or service and, indeed, how their product or service is designed in the first instance.  It may also impact these organisations’ values as they consider how to deploy and use AI in an ethical manner. The EU AI Act, which enters into force on 1 August 2024 over a phased basis, introduces requirements for the development of codes of conducts, risk and impact assessments and staff training to ensure adequate human oversight around the use of AI systems within organisations. This has specific resonance for Chartered Accountants who are members of a profession bound by a code of ethics governing objectivity, confidentiality, integrity, professional behaviour and competence and due care. Chartered Accountants must now ensure that they understand how AI uses, analyses and then outputs data.  Organisations must ensure that any AI-driven information they share, and how they deploy the technology itself, satisfies principles of integrity, honesty and transparency.  Chartered Accountants are well-positioned, with their ethical mindsets, to ensure the integrity of AI systems, and their use within organisations.

As the “year of elections” continues to unfold, Ireland faces a changing global tax environment, but with change comes the opportunity to position the country as a beacon of stability for continued FDI. Cillein Barry and Susan Buggle dig into the details As a small, open economy, Ireland is a competitive location for foreign direct investment (FDI). However, we are also subject to the impact of changes to tax regimes globally, most notably those driven by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the European Union (EU) and the US. Changes to the tax regime in the US, in particular, have an indirect material impact on Ireland’s attractiveness as a location for FDI.  This year has been cited as “the year of elections”, with roughly half the world’s population going to the polls in 2024. The outcome of elections across the EU and, later this year, in the US may serve to shape future tax policy impacting Ireland.  Here at home, though the Irish Government has denied claims of an early election in 2024, an anticipated “giveaway” budget on 1 October means an early Irish election remains a distinct possibility. The US presidential election and tax policy While the outcome of the US presidential election cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time, we do have some insight into the tax policy objectives of both the Democrats and the Republicans should they come to power this year.  In considering possible changes to US tax policy, it is important to note that the approval of tax legislation generally requires 60 votes out of 100 in the US Senate.  This means that one party must hold a large majority or, alternatively, there must be bi-partisan co-operation to approve any proposed changes to tax policy. Neither of these scenarios seems likely in the aftermath of the upcoming presidential election.  While tax legislation may also be passed by a simple majority using a process known as “budget reconciliation”, the relevant tax measures cannot increase the long-term deficit of the US.  In an era of limited bi-partisan co-operation, significant US tax reform is therefore unlikely, as it would require either a super-majority in the Senate or the introduction of tax measures regarded as fiscally neutral over the long-term.  Understanding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act In 2017, then US President Donald Trump’s Republican administration introduced some of the most significant reforms to the US tax code in three decades under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).  The key measures for US businesses were broadly designed to lower the US corporate tax rate to one more comparable with competitors among OECD member countries and to protect the US tax base. These included: Corporate income tax rate: a reduction of the US corporate income tax rate from 28 to 21 percent. Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI): a 10.5 percent tax on a portion of the income earned by foreign subsidiaries of US companies. Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII): a preferential rate of 13.25 percent for income earned by US companies outside the US on certain intellectual property. Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT): a minimum 10 percent tax on base erosion payments made by US entities to related parties outside the US. The TCJA was introduced using the budget reconciliation process at a time when there was a Republican congressional majority combined with a Republican president – not a single Democrat voted in its favour.  Having already introduced such significant reform, what more could the Republican side seek to introduce in 2025? In answering this question, it is important to note that a large part of the TCJA measures were temporary, with 25 of the tax cuts introduced under the Act due to expire in 2025. This includes a slated increase in the rate of GILTI (10.5% to 13.125%), BEAT (10% to 12.5%) and FDII (13.125% to 16.406%). The Republicans are likely to face pressure from US businesses to reverse these planned increases and preserve the impact of the TCJA.  However, the Republicans are also likely to face pressure to extend several individual tax cuts included in the TCJA, which together impact more than half of US households. Indeed, both Democrats and Republicans are in favour of retaining at least some of these measures. The Democrats’ tax proposals The Democrats’ preferred tax policy was outlined in March 2024 in Joe Biden’s “Green Book” budget proposals. These proposals seek to reverse many of the TCJA tax cuts and include: Increasing the corporate tax rate from 21 to 28 percent; Increasing to the GILTI rate from 10.5 to 21 percent; and A repeal of the preferential rate for FDII. To introduce such tax proposals under a new leader, the Democrats would likely require a significant majority, as it would be challenging to introduce such measures while balancing the books to achieve a fiscally neutral outcome.  US Presidential elections: the likely outcome Many US commentators predict a split government in the aftermath of the US presidential elections, with neither party controlling the House and Senate.  Marrying this with the complex procedures required to pass tax legislation and the political pressure to preserve tax cuts for individuals, the most likely outcome for US business taxation is little change to the status quo regardless of who will be elected as the new US President.  Though Republican rhetoric has centred on cutting the federal corporate income tax rate to 15 percent, this should be viewed in a similar light, although the threat of 10 percent tariffs and the EU’s response will need to be monitored closely.  The other key area to watch is US engagement with the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 tax proposals. Under Pillar Two of BEPS 2.0, this year has seen the most significant change in international tax in recent memory, with many countries, including Ireland, introducing a minimum 15 percent tax on the corporate profits of large multinational groups.  Despite positive indications from the US Treasury, achieving sufficient political support to introduce the Pillar Two proposals in the US has proved elusive. However, the mechanics of these rules will mean that US-headquartered groups are likely to be affected by the global minimum tax rules from 2026 onwards.  If Pillar Two plans proceed as anticipated, it remains to be seen how the US will react and whether the party in power will seek to introduce retaliatory measures.  Republicans sitting on the powerful Ways and Means Committee have already outlined proposals to impose an additional five percent tax rate each year on the US income of entities located in foreign jurisdictions applying the Pillar Two rules.  The outlook in Europe We have witnessed significant political developments across Europe in recent weeks, including the election of a new European Parliament in June and domestic parliamentary elections taking place in several neighbouring European countries, most notably France and the UK.  In July, Hungary took over its Presidency of the Council of the European Union and Ursula von der Leyen was re-elected as the President of the European Commission. EU commissioners and working groups will be appointed in the coming weeks. These developments will play a key role in shaping the future direction of taxation policy in the EU.  Recent years have seen the introduction of a swathe of EU-wide tax initiatives, including measures aimed at tackling tax avoidance (e.g. the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive), measures to increase transparency (e.g. the EU public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive) and measures to introduce OECD BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two provisions across the EU via the Minimum Tax Directive.  While Pillar Two has progressed, work on the OECD’s other key initiative to reallocate a portion of the profits of the largest multinational groups to jurisdictions in which customers are located (known as Pillar One) is at best delayed, but more likely dead.   With progress on Pillar One potentially stalling, a renewed focus may be placed on introducing alternative Digital Service Taxes (DSTs), either unilaterally or on an EU-wide basis. In this regard, the current moratorium on introducing DSTs at an EU level is due to expire on 31 December 2024. EU-wide tax measures EU institutions are continuing to work on a range of other tax measures, including Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT), a proposal for a consolidated EU tax base that would be allocated to Member States, and the proposed “Unshell Directive” aimed at tackling the potential misuse of entities without sufficient substance for tax purposes. It remains to be seen which tax initiatives will get priority treatment under the incoming Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the EU, with its stated slogan – “Make Europe Great Again” – focusing on European competitiveness as a key priority.  This is likely to signal shifting sands ahead for EU taxation policies, particularly in the context of Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orban publicly calling BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two “a catastrophic failure,” serving to dampen competitiveness.  EU Member States have also advised the European Commission to slow the pace of development of direct tax proposals, given the significant volume of measures introduced in recent years. Therefore, a more benign approach to tax policy is expected at an EU level for the foreseeable future. Shifting taxation policy: the Irish impact  In an environment of increasing uncertainty, it is worth bearing in mind Ireland’s unique position as an economic gateway for both Europe and the US.  While US investment in Ireland is well-publicised with more than 950 US companies located here, Ireland now also ranks as the ninth largest foreign direct investor in the US, employing about 100,000 people in the States.  Ireland is also the only English-speaking common law trade and investment gateway to the EU. Ireland’s competitive corporate tax rate and transparent and stable tax policies have been a crucial factor in attracting FDI. This tax policy has consistent cross-party support.  Other key factors include our highly educated and skilled pool of graduates, particularly in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), our clear and consistent regulatory environment in key areas such as data protection, and Ireland’s attractiveness as a place to live and work. Ireland must, however, guard against complacency. In a constantly evolving environment, it is essential that we focus on ensuring that Ireland remains a competitive and attractive location for FDI. This includes reducing the cost of doing business and facilitating access to talent.  On a global basis, tax competition remains alive and well and a new wave of incentives and subsidies is being introduced by competing jurisdictions.  Our regimes for attracting high-value jobs and businesses – particularly our research and development (R&D) tax credit, reliefs for intellectual property and international assignees – continue to be key pillars in this space.  With ongoing uncertainty within the EU and across the Atlantic, we now have an opportunity to position Ireland as a beacon of stability and a safe harbour jurisdiction for foreign direct investment. This opportunity must be grasped.    Cillein Barry is Tax Partner with KPMG  Susan Buggle is Tax Principal with KPMG

Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the US presidential race marked the departure of the last “Atlanticist” in American politics and Europe is ill-prepared for what lies ahead, writes Judy Dempsey  The decision by Joe Biden not to run against Donald Trump has upturned American politics. There are so many uncertainties about who will be elected as the next president of the United States on 5 November.  Until then, America will be preoccupied with domestic politics. It’s going to demand huge effort by the departments of state and defence to keep the focus on Ukraine, Israel and what is happening in the Middle East, not to mention China.   With the exception of Ukraine, Europe is a bystander, but Biden’s decision could change the transatlantic relationship.  Few European leaders, apart from French President Emmanuel Macron, understand how this fundamental shift in transatlantic dynamics could affect Europe’s defence, security and intelligence gathering.  Biden is the last “Atlanticist.” His career, experience in foreign policy and age made him a believer in the enduring bonds between the United States and Europe. Yes, his administration complained about Europeans not taking their defence or security seriously, but intellectually and emotionally, he is an Atlanticist.  Donald Trump cares little about Europe, the EU, NATO, or the idea of “the West”. Even if Europe increased its share of defence spending to NATO, it would never be enough. For Trump, Europeans are free-riders and unable collectively to think and act defensively. For him, this is Europe’s problem, not America’s. Just as Ukraine is not America’s problem either. If a Democrat wins the US presidential election, they will likely belong to the younger generation whose past has no connection with Europe and which is more attuned to the emerging competition between the United States and China, Russia and other countries resentful of America and what it represents.  This shift also has major implications for Europe’s security, its economy and future developments in Ukraine. Yet, Europe is not prepared for the changes taking place across the Atlantic.  The post-1945 era that was built on multilateral institutions, arms control and a confident West is ending, so what can Europe do to deal with such irreversible change?  EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen wants Europe to have a Defense Tsar and a collective defense-spending policy. Neither is likely to fly – and not just because neutral countries would not buy into them.  Germany has rejected proposals to finance new defence purchases through joint borrowing, arguing that there is already enough industrial and research funding for defence.  On top of this, because defence is such a national issue, it is hard to see member states ceding any of this sovereignty to Brussels. The real issue here is Europe. The 27 member states can’t agree on which direction the union should take. More political and economic integration would make sense, but several countries want to regain more sovereignty at the expense of making Europe capable of speaking with one voice.   As the United States and the West decline, there is a chance for Europe to step in. Unfortunately, member states and EU leaders lack the courage to do what is needed.  Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

Chartered Star 2024 winner Evan O’Donnell talks to Susan Rossney, Sustainability Advocacy Manager with Chartered Accountants Ireland, about the future of sustainability in the profession Evan O’Donnell was recently named Chartered Star 2024, an annual designation recognising outstanding work in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).   Run in partnership with One Young World and Chartered Accountants Worldwide, the aim of the annual Chartered Star competition is to celebrate the difference-makers in the profession who are helping to combat the climate crisis by bringing real, positive change to their workplaces and communities. As Chartered Star 2024, O’Donnell will attend the One Young World Summit, representing Chartered Accountants Ireland and Chartered Accountants Worldwide, in Montreal, Canada, in September. Here, he talks to Susan Rossney about his interest in sustainability and social responsibility. Tell us about your decision to become a Chartered Accountant. What attracted you to the profession? I loved accounting in secondary school – that “yes” moment when you know your inputs are the same as your outputs! My mother was a mathematics teacher, and my father was a banker, so figures are certainly in my DNA.  I studied accounting at University College Cork, but it wasn’t until I attended a careers fair that I understood the versatility of a career in accounting and the many doors Chartered Accountancy can open.  Have you always been interested in sustainability?  I’ve been interested in social responsibility from the time I was 16 when I travelled to India and worked with street and slum children in Calcutta.  Since then, I’ve volunteered for a range of charities, including Trócaire, Mary’s Meals, HOPE, Cork Penny Dinners, Pieta, Irish Guide Dogs for the Blind, the Irish Cancer Society and Breakthrough Cancer Research.  My interest in sustainability started when I led a sustainable gardening project at college. Volunteers completed training certificates and visited local nursing homes to assist the elderly residents in planting flowers and growing vegetables. It showed me what was possible. Since then, I’ve looked for opportunities to do more and was delighted when I got the chance to host a sustainability networking event at the Apple headquarters in Cork when I was Co-Chairperson of Chartered Accountants Student Society Cork. What initially sparked your interest in becoming a Chartered Star? I heard about the Chartered Star competition during the first year of my training contract with PwC.  In 2020, I was fortunate to be part of a fantastic network, the Irish FinBiz Task Force, with 30 finance and business professionals across Ireland. It had been founded by two previous Chartered Stars and, as the years went on, more Chartered Stars emerged from the network. I was on the network’s SDG Awareness Team where Patrycja Jurkowska (2019 winner) provided us with great insight and knowledge on the topic.  I saw how the competition opened many doors for my colleagues, and I felt it was an opportunity to meet amazing ambassadors of sustainability, be part of a knowledge platform and share key learnings with my network.  I am very proud to be part of the Chartered Accountants Ireland Chartered Star family! What do you see as the greatest sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities for Ireland?  Ireland faces significant sustainability challenges, but also has many opportunities. Climate change is causing more extreme weather, threatening infrastructure and agriculture. Biodiversity loss, due to urbanisation and intensive farming, is reducing ecosystem services like pollination and water purification. Resource depletion, including water scarcity and soil degradation, is harming agriculture and water supplies. Economic risks include the vulnerability of agriculture to climate variability and potential negative impacts on tourism from environmental degradation.  Dependence on fossil fuels poses a risk as global policies shift towards renewables.  Social risks involve health issues from heatwaves and pollution, as well as displacement due to coastal erosion.  Regulatory risks stem from the high costs of complying with EU environmental regulations. However, through all this, there are significant opportunities.  Renewable energy development, particularly wind and marine energy, can reduce fossil fuel dependence and create jobs.  Sustainable agriculture, including organic farming and agroforestry, can boost biodiversity and resilience.  Green technology and innovation, such as circular economy practices and smart grids, can enhance sustainability and efficiency.  By implementing robust policies through the Climate Action Plan and participating in the EU Green Deal, Ireland can lead in global sustainability efforts, attract investment and build a resilient future. Where do you see opportunities for young professional Chartered Accountants in sustainability? Chartered Accountants have many opportunities to help meet sustainability challenges. We can leverage our skills in financial analysis and reporting to enhance transparency in sustainability metrics, ensuring that companies’ environmental and social impacts are accurately reported and assessed.  We can specialise in sustainability assurance, auditing environmental, social and governance (ESG) reports to provide stakeholders with credible information. We can advise businesses on integrating sustainable practices into their operations and strategies and identify cost-saving measures through energy efficiency, waste reduction and sustainable supply chain management.  We can also influence policy by working with regulatory bodies to shape sustainability standards and frameworks.  Additionally, we can drive innovation by supporting the development of green finance products, such as green bonds and sustainable investment funds.  By combining our financial expertise with a commitment to sustainability, young professional Chartered Accountants can play a crucial role in fostering sustainable economic growth and addressing global environmental challenges. Can you tell us about your sustainability role with PwC? I always had a passion for sustainability, and I wanted to incorporate this into my day-to-day life at PwC.  During my time with PwC Cork, I worked in the Assurance Department specialising in high-technology and pharmaceutical company audits along with pensions and grant engagements.  In 2019, while on placement, I was on the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee, and worked under the food pillar of PwC Ireland’s Sustainability Council, focusing on food waste reduction initiatives primarily in PwC offices around Ireland.  I also became an SDG Champion with PwC by completing ‘The Sustainable Life School’ course. This course inspired me to apply for, and later become, a Climate Ambassador earlier this year, where I have equipped myself with education about climate. What does being named Chartered Star 2024 mean to you?  Being the Chartered Star, an ambassador of Chartered Accountants, means representing my profession and country on a global stage.  Having been selected to attend the One Young World Summit in Montreal this September, I am deeply honoured and grateful to have this opportunity.  The Summit brings together young leaders from around the world to discuss and address critical global issues, including sustainability, innovation and social impact. I am committed to making both my profession and my country proud by actively participating in the Summit, sharing insights and learning from global peers. This unique experience will enable me to bring valuable knowledge and innovative ideas back to my colleagues, fostering growth and development within our community.  I look forward to leveraging this platform to highlight the pivotal role of Chartered Accountants in driving sustainable and ethical business practices, ultimately contributing to a better future for all.

Lindsay Russell, a Partner with EY Northern Ireland, talks to Liz Riley about the evolution of her career, professional inspiration and constant thirst for knowledge, variety and challenge in her working life  My interest in accountancy was first sparked as a teenager. During school holidays, while doing my GCSEs and A Levels, my parents encouraged me to gain valuable work experience, which led to a job with WHR Accountants in Armagh under the tutelage of Ken Harrison, one of the founding partners.  WHR had a fantastic team of about 15 who took me under their wing and got me started with the basics of accounting.  After writing out many cheque journals, cash books and extended trial balances manually, I learned that “balancing” numbers gave me a great sense of satisfaction. Something clicked and I realised that accountancy was a career I wanted to pursue.  This summer job continued for four years and greatly influenced my decision to study accountancy at university in Scotland. After graduating, I was fortunate to secure a position with EY Northern Ireland in 2004 and completed my professional exams in 2006. It has been a real privilege to become a Chartered Accountant, specifically an auditor in practice.  As auditors, we are afforded an insight into so many successful organisations across sectors and industries and are in a unique position to support and work with talented individuals through complex and interesting transactions and business initiatives.   The trust we provide as accountants, auditors and business advisors is something that is often underplayed, but is vital to the capital markets and the success of organisations, and I still consider myself lucky to say I play a part in that.  Almost 20 years later in this profession, and I have not looked back. Championing women In those 20 years, I have seen significant changes in the gender profile of our profession, particularly in the last decade.  I am pleased to have been part of this change personally, but what I am really proud of is being able to champion and sponsor female talent within our profession to ensure that others can share in the experiences and opportunities I was afforded early in my career.  As a female partner and leader, I am acutely aware of the responsibility I have in championing other women in our profession. In the long term, my goal is that we create a profession, industry and world in which such an active focus on gender diversity is no longer essential because we have created an environment where opportunities are afforded equally to all people and are fulfilled based on the right person for the role, regardless of gender or any other characteristics.  However, I know we still have some way to travel to make this a reality. I fully appreciate and understand that we must create the right environment for all our talented people to flourish.  For example, organisations must take parental responsibilities and flexible working into consideration. They must do all they can to provide a workplace in which working mothers know they can have a sustainable and rewarding career. I would also highlight that, while gender diversity is important to me as a female leader, I believe that diversity of thought, background and experience is the basis for excellence in any team.  It is not only the experiences of diverse groups, but also their willingness to be open to the views and experiences of others, that creates the best and highest-performing teams, delivering the most for clients and helping to build a better working environment for all.  Embracing education in your career I believe professional development is achieved via a combination of formal learning and on-the-job development.  Formal learning is very important, particularly in our changing regulatory environment, and I find it useful to check my own Continuing Professional Development (CPD) monthly and quarterly to ensure I am on track for compliance.  However, I also find on-the-job learning critical in putting all the theory we learn into practice, and developing the wider skill set that is so valuable and necessary for the accountants of today and tomorrow.  We are living in a world in which technology and the way we work is continuing to evolve, particularly with the advent of generative artificial intelligence. My advice is to embrace change and learn as much as you can from those around you.  Lastly, I would say it’s important to remember that the accountancy skill set remains as valuable today as it ever was and will remain a key part of the workplaces and businesses of tomorrow.  The fluidity of work-life balance There is no magic answer to work-life balance. For me, work-life balance is something that is fluid and needs to be reassessed and flexed regularly and continuously.  I learned an important lesson early in my career: your work-life balance will have ebbs and flows depending on what is going on in both your work and home life.  It is important to be flexible at times and, at others, to know and stand by your “non-negotiables.”  I recognise that at certain times I will have busier and more demanding times in the office, and that it is important to stay focused for the benefit of my teams and my clients.  Equally as important is the need to have planned downtime. I am protective of this downtime when it arrives so I can make sure my family and friends get a fully committed version of me. Everyone will have different styles and different ways of working. My advice is to ensure you understand your own style. Know your peak times, take time out and ensure you communicate clearly with those around you, both personally and professionally, about your work-life balance needs.  Stepping outside your comfort zone When I look back over my career, I can see that my biggest development has come about when I have embraced new opportunities (or challenges) and have been pushed out of my comfort zone.  It is very easy to stay comfortable, but trying new things, seeking out new learning opportunities and working with different people and teams is what accelerates our development, and ultimately, our career prospects.  My career advice is to say “yes” and give it your all. You will always be amazed at where it can take you! It is sometimes the tasks or roles that you think you didn’t want – or didn’t think you would be good at – that are the ones that help you progress and move on to your next role.  I also like to remind people that variety and new opportunities can come from staying in the same job or profession and do not always require drastic change.  I have been with EY for almost 20 years now, which feels increasingly rare in a world where new opportunities are everywhere. I am proof that you can have a varied career with many different roles and opportunities all with the same employer and within the same profession. My final piece of advice is to be honest and true to yourself. Someone once told me to hold a mirror up and be honest with myself about my strengths and weaknesses and what I ultimately want from my career.  I realised early on that I get easily bored and need variety in my work. I know that I am competitive, hard-working and need to feel I am adding value. I recognise that this combination of attributes means I often work too hard.  However, it also means that I am continuously rewarded with challenging opportunities for development, which keeps me motivated and stimulated.  Everyone in our profession must figure out what works for them and remember that their career path, regardless of direction, should be unique to them. Your career doesn’t have to replicate what anyone else before you has done, or what those around you are doing today.

Cormac Lucey explores the misunderstood roots of Ireland’s FDI success and questionable management of surging tax revenues against the backdrop of rising state spending Two important aspects of Ireland’s multinational success story are generally misunderstood.  The first concerns the low-tax strategy that has been the key reason many multinationals have located in Ireland.  As Professor Frank Barry of Trinity College Dublin revealed in his essay “Foreign Investment and the Politics of Export Profits Tax Relief 1956”, this low-tax strategy resulted from then Taoiseach John A. Costello overruling the Department of Finance and forcing an idea promoted by the Department of Industry and Commerce into the Budget.  Underlining the precariousness and capriciousness of life, this strategy didn’t begin to really function until the 1990s.  The second aspect of our multinational story, not generally understood, is how utterly dependent our economy is on American business.  While it is widely known that more than 85 percent of the state’s corporation tax revenues come from multinationals, their contribution to other tax headings is not so well-known.  When you consider multinationals’ 55 percent share of Ireland’s income taxes and 54 percent share of VAT – and apply this lower 54 percent rate to other tax headings – you will see that the multinational sector contributes over 60 percent of the State’s total tax revenues.  How well is the state managing the resulting surge in tax revenues? Well, it’s all being spent, and then some.  According to the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council’s Fiscal Assessment Report published in June 2024, “Excluding excess corporation tax receipts, a deficit of €2.7 billion (0.9% GNI) is forecast for this year. This comes despite a strong economy, with record high employment and historically low unemployment. The question arises: if underlying surpluses are not being run now that the economy is strong, when would they be run?” The quality of much of this spending is highly questionable. The epicentre of rampant State spending growth is occurring in healthcare. A recent Department of Health report analysed hospital activity and expenditure between 2016 and 2022.  It reported a 3.8 percent increase in overall activity, compared with an inflation-adjusted rise in expenditure of 45 percent (nominal rise of 68 percent) and a 29 percent increase in staffing numbers. The Department of Health badly needs budgetary incontinence pads. Or maybe members of the Irish public service simply need to learn how to manage.  Consequence-free management is the key obstacle to effective budgetary control. When staff are treated the same regardless of whether they perform extraordinarily well or extraordinarily badly, should we be surprised when mediocrity results?  The Republic’s governing political class is happy to bask in the reflected glory of multinational-induced prosperity. However, according to the 2023 annual report from the IDA, Ireland’s inward investment agency, the global foreign direct investment landscape is becoming “increasingly challenging and complex.”  And, if he becomes the next US President, Donald Trump plans to significantly undermine Ireland’s attractiveness to US multinationals by putting a 10 percent tariff on US imports. Even though it accounts for 69 percent of employment, Ireland’s domestic sector of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is the orphan of this story. SMEs need targeted tax incentives along the lines of those outlined by Deloitte’s Kim Doyle in the Accountancy Ireland newsletter Briefly. The SME sector also needs a systematic programme to reduce the regulatory burden imposed upon it. Under the guidance of Michael Diviney, Chartered Accountants Ireland recently published Reducing Red Tape, a detailed position paper showing just how that could be done.  The instinctive mindset of government – that ministers are in charge of a great national trainset they can play with at will – flies in the face of the reality that policy decisions involve tricky trade-offs not amenable to facile headlines.  Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.  

Ireland’s medium-sized businesses are more optimistic than their global peers but a more ambitious approach is needed to deliver their expectations, writes Patrick Dillon Ireland’s medium-sized businesses are uniquely optimistic in their outlook ahead of the upcoming US presidential elections and in the wake of the recent elections in France and the UK.  Just 17 percent see geopolitical disruptions as a barrier to growth, compared to 42 percent in the Eurozone and 49 percent globally. This confidence follows through in the main findings among the Irish respondents to our latest Grant Thornton International Business Report (IBR), which captures insights into the outlook of 10,000 mid-market firms across the globe.  Our Irish IBR respondents are optimistic about the outlook for the Irish economy in the 12 months ahead. Close to three-quarters (73%) of the Irish medium-sized companies we surveyed predict a positive future. The findings are reflective of the resilience of Irish companies that have had to navigate a polycrisis in a short period of time, trading through the pandemic, cost-of-living challenges and disruption to global supply chains. This is not just a case of looking at the world through rose-tinted glasses, however. Irish medium-sized companies are anticipating a healthy bottom line over the next year.  Close to three-fifths of the Irish companies we surveyed predict a rise in revenues (57%), profits (59%), and headcount (52%) in the 12 months ahead. While it is fantastic to see such a strong sense of confidence among this cornerstone of the Irish economy, if the last few years have taught us anything, it is that none of us knows what’s around the corner.  To this end, the companies that will continue to succeed in the future will be those that remain hyper-focused on staying one step ahead of the competition – and this is where our International Business Report makes for slightly more concerning reading.  There is a significant difference in attitudes to innovation among Irish firms compared to their international peers. Just under a quarter (24%) of Irish businesses are preparing to increase investment in research and development over the next twelve months compared to three-fifths (60%) of their global peers.  We found a similar gap in levels of planned technology investment, with just under half (48%) of Ireland’s medium-sized firms budgeting for an increase, compared to 67 percent globally. Ireland is a small pool compared to the ocean that is the global marketplace. If Irish firms are to realise their ambition and potential, then they need to look to new markets.  Investing in innovation is key to unlocking these opportunities, whether it is leveraging digital channels to reach customers in every corner of the world or developing tailored products or services for a specific customer segment internationally.  A confident economic outlook is great, but it doesn’t put money in your pocket. To paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, an investment in innovation pays the best interest.   Patrick Dillon is Head of Deal Advisory with Grant Thornton Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.

Revisions to International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 600 will result in higher-quality group audits, but more work will be required to deliver this benefit, writes Noreen O’Halloran The International Standard on Auditing (ISA) (Ireland) 600 has been revised. Issued by the Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority (IAASA), the revised standard applies to the audit of group financial statements.  Effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2023, these revisions aim to enhance audit quality and address inconsistencies in practice. They bring some challenges, however.  The purpose of ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised (the revised standard) is to enhance the quality of the audit delivered, by ensuing better co-ordination and understanding  between the group auditor and the auditor of a group component.  Audit committees, along with group and component management teams, will also experience changes in how the group auditor conducts the group audit.  Roles and responsibilities Various definitions are amended within the revised standard. These include the definition of a component, which now includes entities, business units, functions or business activities, or some combination thereof, determined by the group auditor for the purposes of planning and performing audit procedures in a group audit.  This concept of the auditor’s view of a component marks a departure from the previous standard. Under the previous standard, a component was identified by the group auditor based on the level at which the group or component management prepared the financial information.  As a result, audit committees can expect to see some changes in the identification of the components for the purpose of the group audit. The group engagement partner is responsible for the work performed by the engagement team. The definition of “engagement team” within ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised includes component auditors.  Therefore, it must be clarified that the group engagement partner along with members of the engagement team – other than component auditors (i.e. the group auditor) – will take responsibility for the nature, timing and extent of the direction and supervision of the component auditor’s work and the review of such work.  To fulfil this obligation, in addition to engaging with group management, the group engagement partner will need to be more involved with component auditors and, potentially, component management.  The definition of “significant components” has been removed. This means that there is no longer a set quantitative threshold above which a significant component’s financial information must be audited.  Rather, a more risk-based approach is required. Emphasis has been given to the consideration of the risk of material misstatement at the assertion level of the group financial statements associated with components.  This will mean that more decisions are made by the group auditor in terms of the level of work that is to be performed by each component and by whom this work will be performed. Component auditors may, therefore, expect changes to the scope of their work compared to previous years. The definition of group financial statements has been clarified. The standard focuses on the concept of a consolidation process. This includes the aggregation of the financial information of business units and is wider than the definition of the consolidated financial statement in financial reporting. As a result, audit committees may see a change in the approach to auditing an entity with multiple branches or divisions, as this is now considered to be a group audit.  The standard emphasises the need for a comprehensive approach to auditing all components contributing to group financial statements, ensuring that the audit covers all relevant aspects of the group’s financial reporting. The clarity regarding the definition of a component (including the removal of the significant component), the involvement of the engagement team and the responsibility of the group auditor, may enhance the quality of the audit delivered.  However, additional time will be incurred by the group auditor as a result, who must now ensure that all component auditors are adequately supervised.  The changes to the definition of a component will provide greater flexibility for the group auditor when identifying components. However, this may result in the entity’s management receiving requests for information regarding components that were not previously in scope. Risk-based approach One of the most significant changes in ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised is the alignment of the standard with the principles in ISA (Ireland) 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement.  This requires the group auditor to focus more on identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement at the group level when planning and performing the group audit, rather than simply defaulting to a full scope audit at the component level.  The alignment to ISA (Ireland) 315, and the requirement for the group auditor to take a more active role in identifying and assessing the risks of the material misstatement of group financial statements, will assist in improving audit quality.  It will also require more time, resources and effort on the part of the engagement team, however, and particularly the group engagement partner.  The group auditor will be heavily involved in identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement at the group level and planning the approach to the entire audit, rather than delegating this to the component auditor.  The additional time and effort required will be most evident in large groups with components in multiple locations. The entity’s management may also receive additional, or more granular, requests for information from either the group or component auditor to support the group auditor’s risk assessment procedures.  Communication and documentation ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised reinforces the need for two-way communication between the group auditor and component auditor to ensure that both parties are in sync.  The group and component auditor together comprise one engagement team, so a collaborative environment is essential. The revised standard also emphasises that all ISAs, including ISA (Ireland) 230 Audit Documentation, must be applied in a group audit.  In applying ISA (Ireland) 230, the group auditor must demonstrate in their documentation how they are directing, supervising and reviewing the component auditor’s work.  The group auditor must consider the scenarios where access to either individuals or information at the component auditor level is restricted and how these restrictions are overcome. Enhanced documentation and two-way communication from the beginning of the audit will improve audit quality.  However, it will also require more co-ordination and collaboration, which may be challenging, particularly for complex groups with many components.   Early communication will be essential to addressing the changes in scope, higher levels of group auditor involvement and in identifying any challenges to this involvement, including restrictions on sharing audit documentation electronically or at all, or restrictions on travel to a specific area.  To fulfil their supervisory role, the group auditor may need to navigate various obstacles, including different time zones and language barriers.  Other practical challenges may include how to ensure that component auditors are part of the discussions required by the other ISA (Ireland) standards, including the fraud discussion required by ISA (Ireland) 240. Professional scepticism The revised standard clarifies how the requirements in ISA 220 (Revised) Quality Control for an audit of financial statements – particularly the importance of professional scepticism – applies to achieving audit quality in a group audit.  The group auditor must exercise professional scepticism by remaining alert to inconsistent information from component auditors, component management and group management, regarding matters that may be significant to the group financial statements.  The group auditor must take appropriate actions when inconsistencies are identified. In addition, the group auditor must emphasise the importance of exercising professional scepticism to each of the engagement team members, including the component auditors.  Exercising professional scepticism at the component level may result in the group engagement partner needing to engage more extensively with component auditors and component management throughout the audit.  Crucial supervisory role The revisions to ISA (Ireland) 600 introduce more requirements for group auditors and their component auditors. This requires increased resources, enhanced communication, increased documentation and a greater emphasis on professional scepticism.  Audit committees and group and component management will also see an increase in the level or type of information required from the group or component auditor so that the group auditor can fulfil their requirements in accordance with ISA (Ireland) 600 Revised.  The need for greater group auditor involvement in the planning and risk assessment stages, and the two-way communication required, highlights the importance for all auditors to understand the new requirements and ensure that they have the skills and resources needed to meet them.  To align with the revised standard, group and component management may see a change in the type or nature of information requested by auditors.  The supervisory role the group auditor plays is crucial to the execution of high-quality group audits.  Both the group auditor and the component auditor will need to be familiar with the new requirements and align their audit methodologies accordingly, while group and component management should be willing to provide the additional information required by the auditor.  While the revisions to ISA (Ireland) 600 will undoubtedly increase the workload of both auditors and group and component management, it will result in higher quality audits. This will, in turn, generate greater benefits to the public interest and may avoid high-profile group audit failures in the future.   Noreen O’Halloran is Principle, Audit Quality and Professional Practice Department, KPMG Ireland

The CSRD has changed the sustainability outlook for SMEs reliant on business from larger entities in scope of the directive. Susan Rossney outlines what they can do now to keep ahead of the curve  Chartered Accountants Ireland is a global organisation with close to 33,000 members in positions of influence across society and the economy. With fewer than 250 employees, however, the Institute is also a small to medium-sized enterprise (SME). These SMEs are not often discussed in the context of climate change, but their combined carbon footprint is, on average, five times greater than that of their large corporate counterparts, according to CDP, the not-for-profit climate-disclosure organisation.  The European Commission estimates that SMEs contribute more than 60 percent of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced across Europe.   SMEs tend not to be at the forefront of sustainability discussions either, which have long been treated as the purview of larger accounting practices that have clients with sustainability reporting obligations.  This is expected to change with the implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which introduces an obligation on (mostly) larger businesses to report on the carbon emissions of their supply chain partners.  As part of this, the focus of attention has moved to the SMEs in these larger companies’ supply chains, caught in a so-called ‘trickle-down effect’. These small businesses are expected to find themselves asked by key customers for climate-related information, often for the first time, with the risk of losing valuable contracts if they fail to do so. Despite this, Irish businesses – particularly SMEs – were found to be reluctant or unable to decarbonise, with 86 percent of Irish businesses having no set commitments or targets to decarbonise, and just 11 percent measuring and tracking performance on total CO2e emissions, according to a 2022 study.  Chartered Accountants Ireland aims to provide leadership in this area for businesses in Ireland, first leading by example in our own SME operations. Here are some of the steps we have taken to act on our central ethos, “for tomorrow, for good”. In 2020, we kicked off an Environmental and Climate Impact Project (ECIP) focused on managing carbon emissions, resources (water, paper, catering supplies, etc.) and waste.  We commissioned an energy auditor registered by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland to carry out an internal energy audit for us, and we are working through their recommendations. Measures we have taken to reduce our carbon footprint include: Beginning the process of splitting our water and premises heating systems; Switching to light-emitting diode (LED) lights; Installing a roof net to prevent seagulls eating the insulation;  You can’t manage what you don’t measure, so in 2022, we invested in locally sourced emissions tracking software.  In 2022, we recorded a 13 percent decrease in carbon emissions on our 2021 baseline, and we recorded a 39 percent year-on-year reduction in carbon emissions at our Dublin headquarters in December 2023.   Similarly, there are many steps SMEs can take to reduce emissions and otherwise engage in sustainability practices. Our online Sustainability Centre signposts a variety of resources available to support businesses in these efforts.  Small steps make a big difference, but it’s a marathon not a sprint. My advice is start now, get help, measure – and keep going.  Susan Rossney is Sustainability Advocacy Manager with Chartered Accountants Ireland

Rory Mulvaney talks us through a multi-faceted career that has taken him from law to accountancy and on to entrepreneurship as the founder of his own corporate and compliance service firm  Belfast-born Rory Mulvaney, FCA, is founder and Managing Director of VANTRU, an independent provider of corporate and compliance services with a presence in Ireland, Britain and the Netherlands. Established in 2017 under the name Mulvaney, the company underwent a rebrand in 2023 to become VANTRU and employs a 20-strong team comprising accounting, tax and legal professionals. Here, Mulvaney tells Accountancy Ireland about the evolution of his career and path to entrepreneurship. Tell us a bit about yourself. Why you decided to become a Chartered Accountant? I was born in Belfast and my family then moved to Newry where I grew up and went to Abbey Grammar School. I now live in Rostrevor with my wife, Seana and our four children, Jack, Rory, Olivia and Charlie.   Starting out, I studied law at Queen’s University Belfast and, from there, undertook a Diploma in Legal Practice at the University of Law before joining Bank of Ireland and then McCartan Turkington & Breen in Belfast. At that stage, I decided that a career as a Chartered Accountant would give me the knowledge needed to one day become a business leader and I went on to train with John MacMahon & Co in Northern Ireland and undertook further training as a Tax Consultant with KPMG in Dublin. Looking back now, are you glad you made the decision to qualify as a Chartered Accountant?  Yes, absolutely! I wouldn’t say I had a career plan starting out, but I’m naturally ambitious and driven to succeed, so I always had a desire to do well and to do something meaningful with my life.  When I first decided to qualify as a Chartered Accountant, I could see that it would give me the freedom to work anywhere in the world for any type of organisation and possibly, one day, for myself.  After qualifying, I moved into industry with Bruce Shaw, now known as Linesight, a global cost management consultancy firm, where I was Group International Tax Manager for five years. What was it that prompted you to set up your own business? My first industry role with Bruce Shaw was inspirational. Working with a successful Irish business that was growing at pace and expanding overseas gave me confidence and a wealth of experience. In 2017, I decided to set up as a Corporate Service Provider (CSP) and established Mulvaney as part of Trustmoore, a global corporate services firm which had worked with Bruce Shaw on corporate services outside Ireland.  Trustmoore viewed Ireland and the UK as strategic jurisdictions for business growth. We established a two-year co-operation agreement after I pitched to the founders in Amsterdam in 2016. This was a pivotal moment in my career and a valuable opportunity to learn about the inner workings of the business. I was able to travel to global offices, attend internal academies and spend lots of time with Trustmoore’s founder and owners. Come March 2019, I established Mulvaney Corporate Services. I wanted to launch Northern Ireland’s first locally established, independently owned corporate services provider and to lead the market by providing a unique set of corporate and compliance services to foreign organisations across key jurisdictions. Today, we remain the first and only company of our kind in Northern Ireland. That makes me very proud. What prompted you to rebrand the business to VANTRU in 2023? We mainly service clients with foreign direct investment needs, both inward and outward, for trading and investment purposes, as well as clients in the capital markets space for whom Ireland is a relevant and attractive jurisdiction. As the company has grown, we have had opportunities to work with some high-profile global organisations and last year, seven years after our initial launch, I felt that the time was right to establish an identity and brand that would enable us to compete at the highest levels. What do you regard as your proudest achievements as a business owner? I am extremely proud of the fantastic team of qualified professionals who have chosen to work with VANTRU. It is also a massive achievement for me personally that VANTRU is recognised by many highly respected law firms, auditors, tax advisors and asset managers. We are in the very fortunate position of having financial institutions and CSP firms in other jurisdictions refer work on to us.  What are some of the most important lessons you have learned over the years?  Someone once told me: “people buy from people.” As a business owner, surrounding yourself with great people who can bring something unique to the table is key. In my wider career, I have had the privilege to work for and alongside people who have taught me valuable lessons. John MacMahon is a well-known Chartered Accountant from County Armagh who has built a fantastic all-island practice and property empire. John was always generous with his time, giving me plenty of valuable advice when I was starting out in my own career. Brendan O’Mara, Derry Scully and Gerard Campbell of Bruce Shaw also stand out. A natural entrepreneur, Brendan was the Founding Partner of Bruce Shaw in Dublin over 40 years ago.  Derry was the Group Chair during my time with the firm. He was both technically gifted and able to maintain a lot of key client relationships globally, including with some of the world’s biggest companies. I worked very closely with Gerry, as CEO, and learned a great deal from him also.  In my own journey, I have found myself adopting a lot of their habits, especially Gerry’s, with his little black books and knack for “getting things done”.  In the world of corporate services, I have learned a lot from two Dutchmen – Trustmoore founder Steven Melkman, who is an inspirational and charismatic leader, and Jan Jaap Kuipers, the former CEO of the BK Group.  Who do you most admire right now in business or public life? In business, it has to be Phil Knight, founder and former CEO of Nike Inc. I recently read his memoir, “Shoe Dog,” and was very inspired by his story. I found myself relating to his experiences, especially in the early days. In sport, despite being a Manchester United supporter, it has to be Pep Guardiola. I also read his biography, “Another Way of Winning,” by Guillem Balagué. Guardiola is so much more than just a football coach.  How has the role of the accountant evolved since you first joined the profession? The role of the accountant has been impacted by ongoing advances in technology, including the introduction of new and improved accounting software and cloud-based tools, which automate routine tasks such as bank reconciliations.  We are now also starting to see the impact of artificial intelligence, which will remove the need to carry out routine tasks for finance departments and accounting teams, such as data entry, reconciliations and generating reports.  The daily work patterns of accountants have also changed dramatically. At VANTRU, all of our employees have adopted hybrid working with some team members working remotely on a full-time basis. We recently hired a new team member who is based in Germany! There are many positives to this way of working for our business. We are moving towards a fully cloud-based business model, which will mean that we can hire people from anywhere in the world.   What are your plans for VANTRU in 2024 and beyond?  We have fulfilled most of the goals outlined in our 2019 business plan and we are in the process of agreeing our strategic plan for the next five years with the help of John-George Willis, our Non-Executive Director.   These plans will centre around improving our brand awareness, IT systems, processes and people. We will also consider growth by acquisition if the right opportunity arises.  Put simply, I want our company to continue to grow. I am very involved in developing new business opportunities and, every day, we talk to prospective clients from all over the world.  I am really looking forward to what we can achieve over the next decade.

A new report published by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment could hold the key to unlocking crucial capital for scaling Irish companies, writes Sarah-Jane Larkin The Irish Venture Capital Association welcomes the report, The Use of Finance as a Catalyst to Develop a Scaling Ecosystem, published recently by Peter Burke, FCA, TD, Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment.  This comprehensive report highlights the critical role access to finance plays in the growth and development of businesses in Ireland. We commend the government for its focus on enhancing financial support mechanisms to empower Irish enterprises to scale and compete on a global stage.  We are also pleased to see the commitment to establish an implementation committee to immediately start work on recommendations to help high potential start-ups access scaling finance.  The recommendation to investigate options for pension fund participation in scaling equity funds, and encourage corporate venturing in Ireland, is particularly welcome.  This report has been published at a time when Ireland’s economy stands as one of the most dynamic and robust in Europe, comparing favourably to other small, advanced economies worldwide.  However, it has become evident for Irish companies seeking larger rounds of capital that the dramatic transformation in our economic fortunes in the last 30 years cannot outrun the impact of our longer-term economic history.  The measures suggested in The Use of Finance as a Catalyst to Develop a Scaling Ecosystem, if implemented, would contribute to rectifying the deficits caused by this history.  Ireland’s economic history has been marked by periods of colonisation, famine and political upheaval. All have contributed to some of the financial challenges we now face in terms of the capital available to our SMEs today.  During British rule, Ireland’s economy was heavily controlled, leaving little room for the accumulation of private wealth. The Great Famine further decimated the population and weakened economic structures, leading to widespread poverty and emigration.  Up until the 1970s and in the early stages of the boom in foreign direct investment (FDI), Ireland remained largely agrarian.  Our relatively recent prosperity, rooted in an open FDI-oriented economy, has resulted in a shortfall in the institutional and corporate investment typically seen in other European countries.  Unlike other nations, Ireland did not undergo a transformative industrial revolution in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, nor have we had the same opportunity to create domestic multinationals or intergenerational wealth.  As a result, there are very few domestic multinationals in Ireland that typically deploy assets in domestic venture capital funds or direct investment in start-ups. Over the last 30 years, successive Irish governments have implemented various policies to address these challenges, such as encouraging entrepreneurship, providing grants and subsidies for small businesses, investing in education and innovation and seeding a domestic venture capital and private equity industry.  These measures have met with mixed success due to deep-rooted structural issues, however, and the lack of sources of private capital. What The Use of Finance as a Catalyst to Develop a Scaling Ecosystem shows is that, while Ireland’s economic history has been shaped by a persistent lack of private funds, understanding these historical and structural challenges is crucial in developing strategies to overcome them.  The report’s recommendations to incentivise pension funds to invest in growing Irish businesses could significantly boost the available capital.  By enacting the report’s recommendations and addressing these issues head-on, Ireland could build a more robust and self-sustaining economic future.   Sarah-Jane Larkin is Director General of the Irish Venture Capital Association *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.