• Current students
      • Student centre
        Enrol on a course/exam
        My enrolments
        Exam results
        Mock exams
      • Course information
        Students FAQs
        Student induction
        Course enrolment information
        Key dates
        Book distribution
        Timetables
        FAE elective information
        CPA Ireland student
      • Exams
        CAP1 exam
        CAP2 exam
        FAE exam
        Access support/reasonable accommodation
        E-Assessment information
        Exam and appeals regulations/exam rules
        Timetables for exams & interim assessments
        Sample papers
        Practice papers
        Extenuating circumstances
        PEC/FAEC reports
        Information and appeals scheme
        Certified statements of results
        JIEB: NI Insolvency Qualification
      • CA Diary resources
        Mentors: Getting started on the CA Diary
        CA Diary for Flexible Route FAQs
      • Admission to membership
        Joining as a reciprocal member
        Admission to Membership Ceremonies
        Admissions FAQs
      • Support & services
        Recruitment to and transferring of training contracts
        CASSI
        Student supports and wellbeing
        Audit qualification
        Diversity and Inclusion Committee
    • Students

      View all the services available for students of the Institute

      Read More
  • Becoming a student
      • About Chartered Accountancy
        The Chartered difference
        Student benefits
        Study in Northern Ireland
        Events
        Hear from past students
        Become a Chartered Accountant podcast series
      • Entry routes
        College
        Working
        Accounting Technicians
        School leavers
        Member of another body
        CPA student
        International student
        Flexible Route
        Training Contract
      • Course description
        CAP1
        CAP2
        FAE
        Our education offering
      • Apply
        How to apply
        Exemptions guide
        Fees & payment options
        External students
      • Training vacancies
        Training vacancies search
        Training firms list
        Large training firms
        Milkround
        Recruitment to and transferring of training contract
      • Support & services
        Becoming a student FAQs
        School Bootcamp
        Register for a school visit
        Third Level Hub
        Who to contact for employers
    • Becoming a
      student

      Study with us

      Read More
  • Members
      • Members Hub
        My account
        Member subscriptions
        Newly admitted members
        Annual returns
        Application forms
        CPD/events
        Member services A-Z
        District societies
        Professional Standards
        ACA Professionals
        Careers development
        Recruitment service
        Diversity and Inclusion Committee
      • Members in practice
        Going into practice
        Managing your practice FAQs
        Practice compliance FAQs
        Toolkits and resources
        Audit FAQs
        Practice Consulting services
        Practice News/Practice Matters
        Practice Link
      • In business
        Networking and special interest groups
        Articles
      • Overseas members
        Home
        Key supports
        Tax for returning Irish members
        Networks and people
      • Public sector
        Public sector presentations
      • Member benefits
        Member benefits
      • Support & services
        Letters of good standing form
        Member FAQs
        AML confidential disclosure form
        Institute Technical content
        TaxSource Total
        The Educational Requirements for the Audit Qualification
        Pocket diaries
        Thrive Hub
    • Members

      View member services

      Read More
  • Employers
      • Training organisations
        Authorise to train
        Training in business
        Manage my students
        Incentive Scheme
        Recruitment to and transferring of training contracts
        Securing and retaining the best talent
        Tips on writing a job specification
      • Training
        In-house training
        Training tickets
      • Recruitment services
        Hire a qualified Chartered Accountant
        Hire a trainee student
      • Non executive directors recruitment service
      • Support & services
        Hire members: log a job vacancy
        Firm/employers FAQs
        Training ticket FAQs
        Authorisations
        Hire a room
        Who to contact for employers
    • Employers

      Services to support your business

      Read More
☰
  • Find a firm
  • Jobs
  • Login
☰
  • Home
  • Knowledge centre
  • Professional development
  • About us
  • Shop
  • News
Search
View Cart 0 Item

News

☰
  • Home/
  • News/
  • News item
☰
  • News
  • News archive
    • 2024
    • 2023
  • Press releases
    • 2025
    • 2024
    • 2023
  • Newsletters
  • Press contacts
  • Media downloads
Tax UK
(?)

Latest Agent Forum items, 8 April 2024

Check out the latest items on the Agent Forum. Remember, in order to view each item, you must be signed up and logged in.   All agents, who are a member of a professional body, are invited to join HMRC’s Agent Forum. This dedicated Agent Forum is hosted in a private area within the HMRC’s Online Taxpayer Forum. You can interact with other agents and HMRC experts to discuss topical issues and processes. 

Apr 08, 2024
READ MORE
Tax UK
(?)

Don’t be caught out by downtime to HMRC online services from 12 to 16 April 2024

Do you use HMRC online services? Don’t be caught out by the planned downtime to some services. HMRC are warning about the non-availability of specific services on the HMRC website, a range of services are impacted from 12-16 April 2024. Check the relevant page for information on planned downtime.   In particular, we have been advised that as part of regular maintenance, the following services will be unavailable between the stated times below. The HMRC Service Availability pages will be updated to reflect the affected services.  Services unavailable from 5.30pm Friday 12 April 2024 to 9am 16 April 2024:-  Trusts and Estates;  The Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings;  CGT Property Disposal;   EPAYE;  VAT Registration Service;    Claim VAT Enrolment;   VAT View and Change;   Plastic Packaging Tax; and  The Agent Services Account. 

Apr 08, 2024
READ MORE
News
(?)

The seven traits of a successful sustainability leader

Navigating the complexities of sustainability leadership demands a multifaceted approach, writes Catherine Duggan More companies are grappling with a rising regulatory burden and heightened stakeholder expectations regarding sustainability, presenting the need for a captain to lead the team. Here is a selection of the components that can help make this role successful. 1. Knowledge of the business The impacts, risks and opportunities sustainability presents for each business are unique. Understanding sustainability, along with intimate knowledge of your business operations, stakeholders and future strategic plans, is critical to ensuring the successful integration of the sustainability agenda. 2. Commercial mindset Perhaps more than other disciplines, sustainability tends to attract people who are passionate about the topic and driven by the need to be change-makers. While enthusiasm is certainly necessary, particularly on more challenging days, the ability to consider and incorporate commercial aspects into the wider conversation can prove more effective than passion alone. 3. Risk management While sustainability may be a developing area of expertise in companies, risk management is not. The risk posed by the transition – or failure to transition – to a more sustainable economy can and should be considered through existing risk management processes, enhanced skill sets and frameworks. Being familiar with the vocabulary and the approach that is being taken can help with the incorporation of sustainability considerations. 4. Communication management Many of the sustainability regulations that are being introduced focus on disclosing sustainability-related information to facilitate stakeholder decision-making. The implications of these disclosures must be understood in the wider context of any supervisory oversight. In addition, consistency of investor messaging and alignment with previous external disclosures, public commitments and marketing campaigns are crucial factors for the effective management of external communications. 5. Stakeholder management Getting internal stakeholders onside is the most fundamental skill required to develop and deliver a credible sustainability programme. The ultimate goal of a sustainability function is that it should become business as usual, part of everyone’s day job. Until that point, support is required from all parts of the business at a time when resources are often already at capacity. The ability to tailor messaging to specific functions, outlining the drivers, risks, opportunities and executive support, is critical. 6. Change management All parts of the business will eventually feel the impact of sustainability through the implementation of a new strategy, regulation, processes or responsibilities. Agnostic of sustainability, change management is required to embed this level of transformation and support into the culture of an organisation. 7. Resilience While sustainability aims to deliver long-term resilience for people, the planet and profit, a degree of personal resilience is required to chart the path. In a fluid regulatory environment, an organised and curious mind is needed to develop best practices. A support network is also important to ensure the workload is shared. Building a sustainable future together While the above list may seem unrealistic, it’s important to emphasise sustainability’s ‘team’ nature and the need for support from across the organisation. Identifying a resource proficient in all of the skills outlined above is a challenge. Securing someone with working knowledge of some or all of these areas – and who can upskill – is more achievable. Few people today began their career with the intention of becoming a sustainability professional, but there is now a growing community forging a new path for their companies, with the aim of highlighting the reality that we are all in the same boat and the water is rising. Catherine Duggan is Director of Sustainability at Grant Thornton

Apr 05, 2024
READ MORE
News
(?)

Are CFOs doing enough to future-proof finance?

Ireland’s CFOs continue to prioritise cost control and efficiency over investment in AI but will they pay the price further down the road? asks Derarca Dennis As Ireland’s Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) step up to future-proof the finance function, their role in leveraging technology to improve efficiencies is becoming increasingly pivotal. According to the EY Ireland CFO Survey 2024, finance leaders are not just looking to elevate business performance, they are also actively seeking to tap into the potential of technology while simultaneously strengthening their collaborative alignment with Chief Technology Officers (CTOs). The continued focus on technology investment is unsurprising, considering that 47 percent of respondents identified manual processes and controls as an area where time is used least efficiently in the finance function. It is perplexing that such a high number of respondents continue to cite manual processes and controls as an area for improvement in the finance function. This suggests that organisations have some way to go in their automation efforts, and significant further investment in technology will be required over the coming years. AI and the finance function Despite the investment in technology, the survey results for artificial intelligence (AI) indicate that it is a low priority for organisations right now. Finance leaders in Ireland are still at the very early stages of Generative AI (GenAI) adoption and are firmly focused on using cost reduction and efficiency gains to realise growth. AI use remains modest, with just 26 percent claiming to have leveraged it for enhanced efficiency, automating manual tasks and risk detection, among other use cases. The uptake of GenAI is even lower at just 15 percent. This may come as a surprise to some. While GenAI has been commanding the headlines over the past 15 months, the technology is still not at the stage where it can be employed to carry out advanced functions in finance departments. CFOs are naturally exercising caution until they see some applications proving that GenAI can be trusted in terms of output and security. Just six percent of respondents say they will leverage advanced AI to enhance the finance function or acquire AI skills in the next two years. The figure for a longer five-year span is only moderately higher, with nine percent saying they will integrate AI and advanced AI into the finance function in that timeframe. The results of the survey indicate that organisations are still at the discovery and use case definition stage in relation to AI. Automation It is surprising that greater use has not been made of the technology for automation purposes, given the continued inefficiencies created by manual processes and controls in finance functions. Interestingly, the survey shows a fairly significant budget increase is anticipated, albeit from a low base, for advanced AI (including GenAI) from one to 3.2 percent in the next two years. This suggests an openness to applying the technology as soon as use cases are identified and better understood. Not all AI solutions are expensive or require custom development. To get their organisations to accelerate the AI journey, CFOs can recommend adopting pre-built AI solutions that drive cost efficiency. Cybersecurity In their role as strategic business partners, CFOs must do more than just comprehend the organisation’s risk tolerance; they are also responsible for steering the budget towards areas that need more attention. Just 39 percent of the respondents in the EY Ireland survey say they have ramped up investment in security tools, compared with 60 percent in 2023. This may indicate a degree of complacency regarding cybersecurity, or it could be that investments have begun to plateau following significant increases in recent years. In a very welcome finding, 31 percent of the respondents say they instituted a cybersecurity task force compared with the eight percent in 2023. CFOs’ north star The relatively low priority given to technology-driven transformation and the low rate of AI adoption in finance functions is surprising given current talent shortages. Right now, cost control and efficiency remain the north star for finance leaders in Ireland. Derarca Denis is Assurance Partner and Sustainability Services Lead at EY Ireland 

Apr 05, 2024
READ MORE
News
(?)

The vital role of cybersecurity in business acquisitions

Amid rising cyber threats, integrating cybersecurity into the due diligence process for business acquisitions is becoming increasingly important, writes Mark Butler With the recent rise in digital data breaches, cybersecurity’s critical role in due diligence engagements during business acquisitions cannot be underestimated. Embedding a cybersecurity-focused lens into the due diligence framework is an essential part of helping accountants and their clients tackle and manage potential vulnerabilities before investing proactively. This approach can strengthen defence against cyber threats, support informed, strategic decision-making and enhance a company’s resilience in the face of digital-age risks while ensuring full visibility of the purchaser’s potential exposure. The urgency of prioritising cybersecurity due diligence hinges on four key considerations: Assessing the business’s technological framework In today’s digital-driven business environment, a company’s technological infrastructure is integral to its operational success. Cybersecurity due diligence offers a deep dive into the resilience of the business’s networks, systems and software, revealing potential vulnerabilities. This critical assessment aids in understanding the implications and costs associated with securing or upgrading technological assets post-acquisition, facilitating strategic planning and integration efforts. Ensuring the security of sensitive information The acquisition process provides access to sensitive data, from client details and intellectual property to financial records and employee information. A focused cybersecurity due diligence process is crucial for evaluating how robust the target company’s data protection measures are. Early identification of security gaps enables the implementation of stringent safeguards, thus securing the integrity and confidentiality of vital data assets against potential breaches. Mitigating financial and legal exposures Cybersecurity breaches carry operational risks and significant financial and legal ramifications. A thorough cybersecurity due diligence process can uncover potential liabilities arising from data breaches, regulatory non-compliance and other legal challenges. Forearmed with this knowledge, acquirers can better negotiate the terms of the acquisition, allocate resources for addressing identified risks, and adjust the purchase price to reflect any investments needed to improve cybersecurity. Safeguarding business continuity and brand reputation Maintaining business continuity and reputation is paramount for a successful acquisition. Cyber incidents can severely disrupt business activities, erode customer trust and damage brands. By incorporating cybersecurity due diligence, potential threats can be identified and mitigated through comprehensive incident response planning. This proactive strategy ensures that appropriate measures are in place to minimise the impact of cyber threats on the company’s operational integrity and reputation. Prioritising cybersecurity within the due diligence framework is not merely a precautionary measure; it is a strategic business imperative that gives the purchaser adequate visibility of the acquired business. It can support a thorough assessment of technology-related risks, fortify the protection of sensitive data, mitigate potential financial and legal consequences, and protect the viability and reputation of the business. Finding expertise in cybersecurity can be difficult, however. I advise seeking out recognised specialists offering comprehensive assessments that adhere to international standards. This approach during the due diligence process can help accountants and their clients to understand and proactively address the cybersecurity challenges that come with business acquisitions, laying the groundwork for long-term success. Mark Butler is Managing Partner at HLB Ireland

Apr 05, 2024
READ MORE

Technical Roundup 5 April

Welcome to the latest edition of Technical Roundup. In developments since the last edition, IAASA has issued a revised version of ISA (Ireland) 505 – External Confirmations. The revised standard is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2024 with early adoption permitted.  The Financial Reporting Council has welcomed the culmination of the first phase of the government’s review of non-financial reporting requirements for UK companies which aims to simplify the reporting framework as part of its Smarter Regulation agenda. Read more on these and other developments that may be of interest to members below. Financial Reporting The Financial Reporting Council has issued its final amendments to the FRS 102 and FRS 105 accounting standards, which will finalise the periodic review of the standards. The amendments (of which most come into effect from 1 January 2026) include changes to revenue recognition rules under FRS 102 and 105, and changes in the way some leases are measured & recognised under FRS 102. For more information please see our recent news item. The FRC has issued some guidance material relating to the amendments. They are also planning a webinar to discuss the amendments to the standards on 15 May. The International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) deadline for responding to their recent Exposure Draft  Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity Proposed amendments to IAS 32, IFRS 7 and IAS 1 has passed. The Financial Reporting Technical Committee of Chartered Accountants Ireland has issued its response to this consultation, which includes some recommendations to the IASB in finalising the project. The UK Endorsement Board has also published its response to the same consultation. The IASB has announced that it plans to issue its next IFRS standard, IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, on 9 April 2024. The IASB, in conjunction with the Education Committee and the Financial Reporting Standards Committee of the European Accounting Association (EAA) is holding an education workshop on 22 April to provide an overview of the standard. The IASB has published for public comment the Addendum to the Exposure Draft Third edition of the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard, which supplements the exposure draft published in September 2022. The deadline for responding to this consultation is 31 July 2024. The IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) has issued its Q1 2024 podcast. This considers some recent activity, including the treatment of climate related commitments under IAS 37 Provisions Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. IFRIC has also released its March 2024 update. The IFRS Foundation has issued its March 2024 monthly news summary as well as its National Standard Setters Newsletter. The IASB has also issued a March 2024 update and podcast. EFRAG, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group has extended the deadline for responding to its two surveys on the post-implementation review of IFRS 16. The deadline remains open until 22 April 2024. The UK Endorsement Board has announced some outreach activities to understand UK stakeholder views on IASB’s Exposure Draft Business Combinations – Disclosures, Goodwill and Impairment. The FRC has published its Plan and Budget for 2024-25, outlining its aims for a year of consolidation and prioritisation to support public interest outcomes and UK economic growth. The UK Government has announced its plans to legislate following its non-financial reporting review. The planned measures include a planned increase to the company size thresholds by approximately 50%, as well as other measures designed to streamline and improve reporting requirements. The FRC has welcomed the announcement. The IFRS National Standard Setters March 2024 Newsletter has been issued which features details on the upcoming 2024 World Standard Setters Conference in London and ISSB recent highlights. Auditing IAASA has issued a revised version of ISA (Ireland) 505 – External Confirmations. The main changes to the standard relate to: Clarification on what constitutes an electronic external confirmation. Prohibition on the use of negative external confirmations. Strengthened link with ISA (Ireland) 330 The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks. Enhanced requirements concerning the investigation of exceptions. The revised standard is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2024, with early adoption permitted. The revised ISA (Ireland) 505 is available here. Anti–money laundering and sanctions We have recently prepared an information booklet entitled The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – Changes in Companies House outlining the first set of changes introduced by Companies House on 4 March 2024. The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act gives Companies House, along with the Registrar of Companies for Scotland and the Registrar of Companies for Northern Ireland, the power to play a more significant role in tackling economic crime and supporting economic growth. Over time, its measures will lead to improved transparency and more accurate and trusted information on its registers. The Dept. Of Justice has recently published Guidelines for Designated Persons supervised by its Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Unit (AMCLU). The purpose of the Guidelines is to assist those Designated Persons supervised by the AMLCU in understanding and meeting their Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism obligations under the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010 as amended and related Statutory Instruments. Please click here for a press release with some further details. Insolvency The CCAB-I Insolvency Committee has recently published Technical Alert - Cross Border Insolvency and Brexit. This Technical Alert considers the impact of Brexit on both the recognition of Irish Insolvency proceedings in the UK and the recognition of UK Insolvency proceedings in Ireland. Sustainability The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has issued an update on the jurisdictional progress made in adopting the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. This includes details of the countries who are consulting on their adoption, as well as those who have completed their jurisdictional consultations. The ISSB has issued its March 2024 update and podcast. The FRC has announced the launch of its first market study to examine the UK market for sustainability assurance services. The study aims to ensure this rapidly growing market is functioning effectively and providing high quality assurance over companies' sustainability reporting. The GRI has published three new guidance documents to support global policymakers. These documents cover Double Materiality, Due Diligence and the CSRD. The Ministers for Finance and for Public Expenditure recently published the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund Bill 2024. The Bill will provide for the establishment of the two funds in its title. One is the Future Ireland Fund which is for the purpose of supporting State future expenditure pressures including ageing, climate, digitalisation and other fiscal and economic challenges in a consistent and sustainable manner from 2041 onwards. The other is the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund which is for the purpose of supporting State expenditure, in 2026 or any year after that to assist with climate change objectives and nature, water quality and biodiversity issues. The Fund will provide for resources for spending in a future downturn to support expenditure through the economic and fiscal cycle and to support designated environmental projects. Please click here for a press release on the Future Ireland Fund and Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund Bill 2024 which provides further information. Other news The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published its third consultation package under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). As part of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC)’s review of the UK Stewardship Code 2020, a series of roundtable discussions are being held on the efficacy of the 2020 Code in order to receive feedback on areas for potential improvement and the extent to which the Code continues to meet its stated purpose.  These discussions will run from 26 March to 7 May. The FRC and the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) have announced a Memorandum of Understanding on Reciprocal Arrangements (MOURA) making it easier for auditors to work between both countries. The UK’s Financial Intelligence Unit has issued the 25th edition of its SARs in Action magazine which focusses on the Illegal Wildlife Trade. Powering Prosperity – Ireland’s Offshore Wind Industrial Strategy, is the first strategy of its kind for Ireland which aims to build a successful and impactful offshore wind energy industry.  It was developed as part of close ongoing collaboration between the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and other government departments and agencies within the Offshore Wind Delivery Taskforce (OWDT). Proposed new company law provisions The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment published the General Scheme of Companies (Corporate Governance, Enforcement and Regulatory Provisions) Bill 2024 on 15 March 2024. The General Scheme proposes wide ranging changes to the Companies Act 2014. Changes which may be of interest to readers include a change to loss of audit exemption, receiverships, SCARP and winding up, three new grounds for involuntary strike off, changes for Corporate Enforcement Authority and provisions relating to IAASA. You can click here to read an Institute news item giving more detail about the proposed changes. Corporate Enforcement Authority Readers can also find more detailed information on changes that the Companies (Corporate Governance, Enforcement and Regulatory Provisions) Bill 2024 proposes for the Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA) in the CEA’s recently published  information note and press statement. For further technical information and updates please visit the Technical Hub on the Institute website.      This information is provided as resources and information only and nothing in the information purports to provide professional advice or definitive legal interpretation(s) or opinion(s) on the applicable legislation or legal or other matters referred to in the information. If the reader is in doubt on any matter in this complex area further legal or other advice must be obtained. While every reasonable care has been taken by the Institute in the preparation of the information we do not guarantee the accuracy or veracity of any resource, guidance, information or opinion, or the appropriateness, suitability or applicability of any practice or procedure contained therein. The Institute is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of the resources or information contained herein.    

Apr 05, 2024
READ MORE
Tax
(?)

Chartered Accountants Ireland secures important visa change for international hires

Following constructive engagement with Government departments, the Institute has secured a change which should make the process of hiring non-EEA accountants by way of a Critical Skills Employment Permit (CSEP) less burdensome. In recent months, member firms have reported to us a significant increase in the need to apply for bridging CSEP visas for their workers while their residency status is being processed.  New rules announced this week should substantially reduce this requirement. CSEP’s are valid for a period of two years, after which employees holding this permit can typically go on to apply for continued residence in Ireland under what is known as a Stamp 4. Since November 2023, in order to secure a Stamp 4, the holder of a CSEP was required to complete a minimum of 21-months' work following the issuance of a Stamp 1 (a permission to work visa). Delays in issuing a Stamp 1 meant that member firms have had to apply for bridging CSEPs because the 2-year CSEP would expire before accountants could meet the 21-month work requirement. Amplifying our members concerns, we called for a reinstatement of the previous system whereby a Stamp 4 could be secured 21 months from the commencement of employment in the State - rather than from the commencement of a Stamp 1. Following a sustained period of engagement with department officials, this suggestion was formally adopted by the Department of Justice with immediate effect – details of the changes can be found here. Chartered accountants are currently listed on the Government’s Critical Skills Occupations List – meaning that due to capacity shortages in the industry, suitable candidates from non-EEA jurisdictions are eligible to apply for a Critical Skills Employment Permit (CSEP) to come and work in the profession here. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and the Department of Justice have jurisdiction over the issuance of CSEP’s and Stamp 4 residence permits. Further information on CSEPs can be found here on gov.ie. The previous changes announced by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (DETE) on November 15 2023 can be found here. Should you have an issue which you would like to bring to the attention of the public policy team, please reach out via our email publicpolicy@charteredaccountants.ie

Apr 05, 2024
READ MORE
Insolvency and Corporate Recovery
(?)

Technical Alert - Cross Border Insolvency and Brexit

The CCAB-I Insolvency Committee has recently published Technical Alert - Cross Border Insolvency and Brexit. This Technical Alert considers the impact of Brexit on both the recognition of Irish Insolvency proceedings in the UK and the recognition of UK Insolvency proceedings in Ireland.

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Careers
(?)

The coach’s corner -- April/May 2024

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions Q. I manage a team of four people in a large organisation. Up until recently, we all got on and worked well together. However, the mood has changed. The work is getting done, and everyone is polite, but I am being shut out. I think this is in response to company-wide changes during which we lost a popular team member. I had no control over this. A. One of the key things leaders do is act as a buffer between the hard shell of the organisation – with its policies, structures and procedures – and the social and emotional needs of individuals. It is a tough gig.  Right now, it sounds like your team is angry with the organisation. Sadly, they are not going to tackle the CEO, so you are getting the flack. When change is perceived negatively, there is a lot of blame. Leaders often get sucked into explaining, defending and rationalising – which only makes things worse. In reality, people are frightened and worried. They are wondering, ‘Can I cope with the changes?’, ‘Will I be next?’ They are placing blame at your feet to hold those fears at bay. While you may be unable to control the changes your company decides to make, you can help your team to navigate them.  Allow people to air their fears – and listen without judgement. Underneath it all, your team does not blame you. They understand that changes need to be made to keep organisations competitive. When you listen, people will start talking about what is important to them, and this is where you can have a connected conversation. I suggest you raise this issue at a team meeting. Say that you have noticed a change in the team mood and feel it would be useful to discuss this in one-to-ones or at the next team meeting.  If people bring up the issues, connect with them where they are. Prepare to listen and absorb. You might have to listen to a rant – at the end of a rant, there is often an apology and an acceptance of the need to move on.  When the time is right, agreeing on how to move forward may be useful. Have some ‘connecting’ questions ready, for example: What is important for you/the team? What could I/we have done differently? What do you want from me/from each other at this time? What can I help you with?  How do we support each other? How do we want to move forward? Finally, it may be important to look at how your team member left. Did you and the team get a chance to mark that properly? If not, the team may like to fix that. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant with Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Member Profile
(?)

Measurement beyond KPIs

Three Chartered Accountants tell us how they use performance metrics to enhance organisational efficiency beyond traditional benchmarks Niamh McCarthy Finance Business Partner Primark Relying solely on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) can mean ignoring the human elements that impact performance. Focusing only on a project’s outcomes might meet KPIs, but it can also make people feel that their wellbeing or personal development is not a priority. In my experience, the best way to ensure a balance between quantitative metrics and qualitative assessments is to set clear expectations when setting annual goals, provide feedback and coaching more regularly than in one-off annual reviews so that everyone is aligned, and add weighting to both quantitative and qualitative metrics based on their importance to the company.  Subjective factors such as employee behaviour, teamwork and communication skills are crucial in performance evaluations.  These measures can influence a company’s culture as employees feel heard and that they can collaborate with their peers. These positive behaviours drive a positive culture. The more positive employees feel, the more productive they tend to be.  Careful consideration is required before implementing alternative performance measures to ensure clear definitions of the metrics. Transparency is a must to ensure everyone understands the metrics that are being used.  A standardised approach is also needed for all employees. To achieve this, the managers setting these performance measures need adequate and uniform training to ensure consistency for everyone.  Employees should be involved in their goal-setting every year, of these goals must align with the company’s values and objectives. There should be a sense of ownership over these so that they are not just ‘given’ to the employee but they instead feel that they have created them, can drive them and ultimately achieve them.  These goals should be reviewed regularly – not just annually – to ensure that they are still relevant. Otherwise, you risk employees feeling disconnected from their own objectives or those of the business.  Unlike traditional performance metrics focused solely on quantitative outputs, alternative performance measurement methods often take a more holistic approach.  Various factors are considered, such as skills, behaviours, contribution to the team and alignment with company values. This comprehensive assessment provides employees with a more nuanced understanding of their strengths and potential areas for improvement, facilitating targeted development efforts.  Employees who feel they can grow and develop within a company are more likely to actively contribute to the business. The more you give back to employees in terms of recognising their development and wellbeing, the more they will give back in turn. Mark Riseley Strategic and Financial Consultant/Fractional CFO My lens is formed from a career working for high-growth scale-ups where change is constant, requiring systems, data, processes and (most importantly) people to flex as the company grows.  Traditional KPIs are often unsuited to measuring capacity to scale efficiently, for both people and companies, and do not capture a company’s true enterprise value along that path. Some alternate measures of performance include: Time management – In high-growth environments, time may be a team’s most valuable commodity. Does the company measure time, quantity and output generated by meetings?  Data – What is high-quality data, and what is just noise? Instead of just measuring data output, measure the speed and efficiency of decisions to determine which data is worth keeping. Adaptability to a culture of change – Identify, hire and measure based on key personality traits, such as decision-making capacity, adaptability/flexibility, resilience, trust, diligence and communication skills, rather than just the known skills of the profession. Effectiveness of organisational design – Is the organisation’s design scalable, or does it need to pivot to enable growth? Does it allow executives to delegate/empower decision-making? Check employee turnover to determine the effectiveness of your organisation’s outlay. Common goal – Is the common goal clear? Do companies measure the clarity of messaging, such as doing spot checks on the elevator pitch, for example? Do performance measures flow from the corporate to departmental and individual level? Make sure all messaging is aligned. Enterprise value – Is enterprise value (EV) clear, measured and reported? Is there a consequence to hitting forecasts? The ability to do this can mean the difference between a rear-view EV and a front-view EV. Are margins increasing, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of scaling systems, processes and people? To ensure that alternative performance measures align with organisational goals and contribute to overall success, companies must clearly define their goals, objectives and values so that employees fully understand and can align them with their own goals, objectives and values.  Alignment and collaboration between different departments and teams within the organisation will ensure alternative performance measures are consistent and mutually reinforcing. Success is more likely if all employees feel they are working towards a common goal aligned with the company’s goals.  Yier Hu Senior Associate in Management Consulting KPMG   There are certain limitations to relying solely on KPIs for performance measurement. Although KPIs provide quantitative metrics to measure performance, they tend to overlook crucial perspectives essential for a comprehensive evaluation.  At KPMG, we recognise the importance of looking beyond KPIs to ensure a thorough approach to performance measurement. The quantitative matrix can fail to account for a series of subjective factors, such as employee behaviour and communication skills. These intangible elements offer valuable insights into employee performance and should be considered alongside quantitative measures. KPMG employs its own separate benchmark for performance measurement, analysing performance from six distinct perspectives: client, people, innovation, financial strength, public trust, quality and development. We advocate for measuring performance from multiple perspectives, recognising the importance of a holistic approach. These alternative measurements assess the benefits an employee brings to clients while also evaluating their contributions to the working environment.  From the people perspective, we focus on how the team studies and improves, how to be a strong mentor to the team, how to build internal communication and culture and how to make everyone feel like a part of the team.  From an innovation perspective, we prioritise building trust with the team and client, supporting the team to identify opportunities, and leading by example. This is crucial and creates long-term value while also enhancing overall satisfaction within the company.  By embracing a multi-dimensional approach to performance measurement, organisations can gain a more nuanced understanding of their employees’ contributions and foster a culture of continuous improvement and growth.

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Comment
(?)

Why the European Parliament elections matter

Growing support for extremist and smaller parties across Europe could change the fundamental composition of the new European Parliament, writes Judy Dempsey Elections to the European Parliament (EP) take place every five years. Until recently, the outcomes were predictable. The conservative European People’s Party has dominated with the Progressive Alliance of Socialists, albeit with declining numbers, and Democrats (S&D) coming in second.  Their decline reflects waning support for mainstream parties and an increasing fragmentation of European party systems at national and European levels.  This time round, the EP election is about how the growing support for extremist and smaller parties across Europe could change the composition of the parliament and the EU. Integration is taking a back seat. The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) reckons the major winner in the EP elections will be the radical right Identity and Democracy (ID) group.  “We expect it to gain 40 seats and, with almost 100 MEPs, to emerge as the third largest group in the new parliament,” states ECFR.  The political elites across Europe are nervous as far-right parties in France, Germany, Austria, Portugal, Hungary, Italy and other countries are campaigning hard to strengthen their presence in the EP. And, despite backroom deals and trade-offs taking place inside the EP regarding which countries will become EU commissioners, a different political constellation could upset the way things have been done in the past. The political status quo across Europe is changing. The 2009 global financial crisis dented the belief that the EU was on a permanent trajectory towards prosperity. The wars in Syria that led to well over a million people seeking refuge in Europe in 2015 created divisions inside the EU regarding identity and values. COVID-19 and Russia’s war in Ukraine dented the unity and self-confidence of the EU even further.  More importantly, as EU leaders grapple with these global issues, they must respond to their electorates back home.  Citizens want security, affordable housing, better access to good schools, healthcare and other public services. These services are under pressure as governments, struggling with inflation, weigh up the cost of spending or saving more.  The far-right, nationalist and far-left parties, from the comfort of not being in office, exploit these crises. They want their governments to stop sending weapons to Ukraine; to stop the inflows of asylum seeks or refugees fleeing wars, famine and the effects of climate change. They question the costs of protecting the environment.  In short, the sense of security that characterised most of (Western) Europe after 1945, and even after the reunification of Germany after 1991, is being replaced with an uncertainty that populist and far-right and far-left parties are tapping into.  They challenge the status quo that oversaw the establishment of today’s EU.    If they gain many seats in the EP, they will not want to leave the EU. The financial benefits are too big and support for the EU is still high across the bloc. Instead, they want to change the EU from within.  The issue for these parties is sovereignty. Like Brexit, they want to ‘regain’ their national sovereignty but remain in the EU.  Yet EU membership requires ceding some sovereignty in return for certain benefits. With few exceptions, EU leaders shy from selling those benefits to their citizens. Their reluctance plays into the hands of the far right and the far left.   Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Technical
(?)

EU audit reform: 10 years on

Patrick Gorry delves into the findings of the European Commission’s Market Monitoring Report and revisits the broader context and impact of EU audit reform On 5 March 2024, the European Commission published its triennial Market Monitoring Report, analysing Public Interest Entity (PIE) audit data from 2019 to 2021 across 27 Member States as well as Norway.  A decade after the enactment of European Union (EU) audit reform legislation, the report underscores the persistent market dominance of the main firms in PIE audits, resulting in limited choices for auditors. Background and objectives of EU audit reform The introduction of EU audit reform stemmed from several key drivers and broader contextual factors.  Amidst the global financial crisis of 2008, weaknesses in financial reporting and corporate governance practices were exposed, prompting the EU to prioritise enhancing the integrity and transparency of audit processes.  In 2014, the EU adopted two legislative instruments: Directive 2014/56/EU, which amended Directive 2006/43/EC on the statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (the Audit Directive), and Regulation No. 537/2014 on specific requirements regarding the statutory audit of PIEs (the Audit Regulation).  The legislation was led by several key EU institutions, including the EU Commission, EU Parliament, EU Council, European Securities and Marketing Authority (ESMA) and national regulatory authorities in EU Member States.  While the overarching goal was to increase the quality of statutory audits, the four primary objectives set out for the reform were to: Reinforce auditor independence; Promote market competition; Enhance transparency for investors; and Strengthen pan-European supervision. Measurement of success  To evaluate the legislation’s effectiveness, we must examine each objective. Reinforcing auditor independence The legislation mandates the rotation of audit firms for PIEs after a specified period to help address familiarity and independence issues, promote fresh perspectives and improve audit objectivity.  It also restricts audit firms from providing certain non-audit services to their audit clients and imposed limits on fees for such services.  These measures aim to promote independence, prevent conflicts of interest and uphold audit integrity. The legislation has strengthened auditor independence by enforcing mandatory rotation for auditors of PIEs. This has reduced conflicts of interest and enhanced audit objectivity.  Stricter rules regarding non-audit service provision have further bolstered auditor independence, ensuring a focus on high-quality audit services. Mandatory rotation has, however, faced criticism for potential unintended consequences, such as increased costs for companies and concerns about the disruption of longstanding audit relationships.  The Market Monitoring Report revealed limited choice in tenders within the EU audit sector: 16 percent of the tenders had just one bid and 59 percent left PIEs with a limited choice of two to three bids.   In the same report, 51 percent of surveyed audit committees that had undergone auditor changes indicated that it was too early to evaluate the impact of auditor rotation or that no assessment had been made at the time the Commission issued the questionnaire.  Furthermore, 22 percent of audit committees rated the impact of auditor rotation as ‘neutral’, while 12 percent rated it ‘positive’. Promoting market competition The legislation aims to promote market competition and diversity in the audit sector by encouraging smaller audit firms to participate in PIE audits. It is meant to drive innovation, enhance audit quality and offer clients a broader selection of service providers. To achieve this, the legislation mandates regular rotation or tendering of audit engagements to stimulate competition.  It also promotes joint audits to facilitate smaller firms’ involvement and enhance market competition.  Additionally, the legislation aims to increase transparency in the audit market by publishing data on audit firm market share and concentration. Despite these efforts, market concentration remains a challenge. Larger firms continue to dominate, limiting the entry of smaller firms and hindering diversity among service providers.  While the largest firms’ dominance in the number of PIE audits has fallen slightly, they still control a significant portion of the market from a fee perspective.  Interestingly, a growing demand for joint audits indicates a potential shift in the market landscape toward increased diversity. The Market Monitoring Report highlighted the continuing imbalance: In terms of total turnover among audit firms, the largest four firms collectively accounted for approximately 80 percent of the market, consistent with previous reports from the European Commission. Despite a decline in their share of PIE audits, these firms still hold a dominant position, capturing 86 percent of revenue from this source.   Joint audits now account for 16 percent of the PIE market, up from nine percent in 2018. This trend is evident across an increasing number of Member States, with five additional countries adopting joint audits since 2018, bringing the total to 13. Among the six Member States with the most diversified PIE audit markets, joint audits are prevalent in five: France, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland and Greece. The findings relating to European market concentration are replicated in the Irish market. The Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority’s most recently published Annual Audit Programme and Activity Report put the market share of the four largest firms at 87 percent.  Enhancing transparency for investors The legislation mandates increased audit reporting transparency, requiring additional information disclosure.  This increased transparency aims to improve communication between auditors, clients and stakeholders, providing a more comprehensive view of the audit process. The new rules have significantly improved the informational value of audit reports, which is a key success of the legislation.  The mandates have improved communication between auditors, clients and stakeholders, ensuring investors can access relevant information to make informed decisions.  However, challenges remain in effectively communicating audit findings to investors. Discussions are ongoing concerning further enhancements to meet the investors’ evolving needs.  Strengthening pan-European supervision The reform introduced measures to enhance governance and oversight of audit firms, including establishing regulatory bodies and oversight mechanisms to monitor compliance with audit standards. The objective was to improve the consistency and effectiveness of audit supervision across Europe. The legislation has undoubtedly increased cross-border cooperation and information sharing among national competent authorities.  Harmonising audit standards and practices across Member States has aligned regulatory requirements, fostering a unified framework for audit supervision while improving quality and consistency at the European level. However, one of the main challenges of strengthening pan-European supervision is the divergence in implementation of the audit regulation and oversight practices across Member States. Future audit reform EU audit reform represents progress, but there’s still work ahead. While successes are evident, challenges persist, notably the dominance of major audit firms. The 2022 EU Commission study on the impact of the audit reform highlights improvements in harmonising national frameworks. However, it underscores lingering disparities in the transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU audit legislation across countries. The legislation has profoundly impacted audit firms and the profession by reshaping regulatory requirements and enhancing independence, quality standards and transparency within the EU.  Yet, ongoing evaluation is necessary to ensure continued progress in the improvement audit quality, transparency and governance. Recent high-profile accounting scandals, such as the Wirecard bankruptcy in Germany, underscore the need for further reform, especially amid increasing demand for sustainability reporting and digital audits.  With a new EU Commission and Parliament taking office imminently, however, further legislative developments are unlikely in the near term.  On the other hand, the Market Monitoring Report identifies potential challenges, including inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, geopolitical instability and the growing use of data analysis tools and artificial intelligence, which will require attention sooner or later.  One thing appears certain – what audit will look like in another 10 years will dramatically differ from what it looks like today. Whether an EU Audit Reform 2.0 is one of key change drivers remains to be seen. Patrick Gorry is a Partner in the Audit and Assurance Financial Services Group of Mazars Ireland

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Member Profile
(?)

“Operate with integrity at all times – your reputation is everything”

John Hansen talks us through his career as a Chartered Accountant and new role as Chair of the Institute of Directors in Northern Ireland John Hansen is the newly appointed Non-Executive Chair of the Institute of Directors in Northern Ireland. Formerly Partner in Charge at KPMG in Belfast and KPMG’s international representative to KPMG Greece for two years, Hansen is also currently Non-Executive Chair of Titanic Quarter Limited. He sits on the business funding committee of Invest NI and holds directorships in several other companies. Tell us a bit about yourself and why you became a Chartered Accountant?  I grew up in Belfast. My father worked at the Ulster Museum and my mother at the Royal Victoria Hospital. I am married to Linda and have two daughters and four grandchildren. I studied economics with accountancy at Queen’s University but wasn’t really sure at that time what I wanted to do after graduating. I drifted towards accountancy because people told me it was a versatile qualification that could provide a solid grounding for lots of different business-related careers and would give me options. They were right!  I took part in the graduate recruitment process in my final year at university and opted to join Coopers and Lybrand, which would eventually morph into PwC.  I started out working in insolvency for a year or so, which I really enjoyed. Then I requested a move so I could gain more accounts experience and was sent to Omagh for a year – another great experience. After that, I returned to insolvency and stuck with it for the rest of my career, eventually moving into forensic work, which became my greatest interest. I went on to head up Coopers and Lybrand’s Insolvency Division before joining the Industrial Development Board for Northern Ireland (now Invest NI) on secondment. The secondment opportunity gave me fantastic consultancy and commercial experience and became a real turning point for me professionally.  I was able to expand my skill set significantly, learning so much about business and what makes companies ‘tick’. I also met some wonderful people during that time, some I still count as friends today.  Did you have a career plan starting out? Has your career unfolded as you anticipated? I wouldn’t say I had a career plan as such. I wanted to pass my exams – and I did, apart from one small hiccup, which I put down to too much partying! – and then see where opportunities might take me. Work life led me down the insolvency and forensics path, and my career sort of developed from there. I recall when I was approached with an offer to join McClure Watters by the firm’s two partners. The idea of moving from a safe environment to a start-up division was daunting, but I decided to accept and believe it was from there I developed a reputation as a leading insolvency practitioner. Due to the firm’s relatively small size (compared with the Big Four), the really big jobs didn’t tend to come my way. So, when I was approached to join KPMG in Belfast to head up its restructuring and forensics division, I again opted to make the move.  It wasn’t an easy decision from a personal perspective. I had a wonderful time working with McClure Watters, but my time with KPMG turned out to be equally fulfilling, and I ultimately became Partner in Charge of KPMG in Northern Ireland. On retirement from that position, I was approached to take on the role of KPMG International’s representative to KPMG Greece for two-and-a-half years during the Covid pandemic. Some of the biggest challenges for me in my career have been the difficult decisions to leave existing roles and move to new organisations. It wasn’t easy. Every move involved serious soul-searching, but with hindsight, each move propelled my career forward.  What is your proudest achievement during your tenure as Partner in Charge of KPMG in Northern Ireland? I was Partner in Charge at KPMG in Northern Ireland from 2015 to 2019 and, during that time, we moved the business to fantastic new premises in the Soloist Building at Lanyon Place while also delivering business growth of over 30 percent.  Relocating to the new office really reinvigorated our people and allowed me, in part, to leave a legacy for those who continue to work with KPMG in Northern Ireland now and in the future. Among the people you have worked with, who has been your biggest inspiration?  I remember my first meeting with John Ross, my boss at Coopers and Lybrand. He asked me a technical question, I answered it and he then enquired as to whether I had checked all relevant legislation, guidance notes and checklists before arriving at my response. There was just one technical note I had overlooked. John told me to go away and research the subject matter “properly”.  My answer to the issue remained unchanged, but this time around, John accepted it because I had done the research “properly”! Never again in my time with him did I make the same mistake. Since then, my approach has always been to leave no stone unturned in arriving at any decision. Is there any career advice you would offer your younger self if you could? Do whatever you can to surround yourself with good people, whether you are starting out (which can be challenging, as you tend to inherit people at this point in your career) or when building a team.  I have been very fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with fantastic people and that has only ever benefited me.  It is important to be transparent and open in your work and to operate with integrity at all times. Your reputation is everything.  I have always worked hard to build lasting relationships and have always picked up the phone to answer calls – you just never know who might be calling!  What I’ve learned is that the smallest leads can develop into the biggest assignments. I have also tended to deal with what I can see in front of me – viewing each ask as a number of small, manageable tasks, even when others may have viewed it as a major challenge. As a result, throughout the years, I hope I have developed a reputation as someone who can solve difficult problems and who is honest, trustworthy and direct. I consider myself commercially minded and have always had a reasonable amount of common sense (I hope!).   The experience I gained in my career, together with the esteem in which the Chartered Accountant brand is held, are the reasons I believe I’ve been approached to take on non-executive roles in the years since leaving KPMG.  In your experience, how has the role of the accountant evolved since you first joined the profession? The accountancy profession has become more regulated over the years and accountants today tend to work in silos more than might have been the case when I started my career, driven by considerably more lines of business. With the emergence of new service lines and increasing public and professional accountability, the role of the accountant – in Northern Ireland, in particular – has become more challenging. I would view the whole area of risk management for accountants in a very different light today than I did when I started out. What prompted you to become involved in non-executive directorships? My first directorship was with Wilsanco Plastics in Dungannon, Co. Tyrone. I had worked with the owner previously and he got in touch.  I remember the conversation well. I said, “You want me to help you and you will pay me for something I have never done before?” and he said, ‘I trust you,’ – end of conversation!” I have been Non-Executive Chair of Titanic Quarter Limited for close to three years, working with two great executive directors pioneering sustainable development at Belfast’s Maritime Mile. We have an ambition to increase investment to over £2 billion. I am now also taking on the role of Chair of the Institute of Directors (IoD) in Northern Ireland. I have been on the committee of the IoD in Northern Ireland for four years and I am looking forward to my new role. I find non-executive work very enjoyable. I don’t need to be ‘full time’, and I enjoy the interaction with executive teams.  I can focus on strategy, relationships and the bigger picture – knowing the detail, but without having to get into the execution of that detail.  Being able to advise and challenge based on the experiences I have gained over the years really allows me to add value.  Tell us about the work of the Institute of Directors in Northern Ireland? The Institute of Directors in Northern Ireland has a small team of great people delivering big things, led by Kirsty McManus and Heather White who are fantastic.  We represent our members’ views on policy, economic and business activity in Northern Ireland.  We offer great networking opportunities covering topics like governance, legislative and governmental developments, which are essential to ensuring that those who hold directorships do the best job possible.  We take ‘the pulse’ of our membership and represent their views, needs and priorities in the political arena.  We also offer professional development opportunities and a pathway to achieving Chartered Director status.  Gordon Milligan, the outgoing Chair of the Institute of Directors in Northern Ireland, carried out fantastic work in developing the organisation during his tenure.  I want to continue to grow our membership and continue to develop the fantastic training and certification opportunities we offer our members. Ultimately, we are all about connecting, influencing and developing. 

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Innovation
(?)

Riding the wave of digital transformation

New technologies are transforming the way accountants work and the profession must adapt to and embrace this sea change to foster future success, writes Conor Flanagan How people interact with technology is changing as it becomes increasingly powerful, and our expectations of what it can and should deliver continue to rise.  In our profession, the risk does not come down to a lack of technological literacy or the complexity of new accounting technologies; the risk is that we might ignore the wave of change sweeping through the profession.  If you ride the wave, however small, you will grow and develop with the changing industry. But ignore the wave, and you risk being left behind in the shallow waters of a pre-digital world. Investing in the future Digital transformation should not be viewed as a cost, but rather an investment in the future of your business – an investment that can improve processes and ensure your business is at the cutting edge of technology and the benefits that come with it.  A successful digital transformation can unleash the potential of your business and your team by freeing your time to focus on strategic and value-added tasks, ultimately driving growth. We are all aware of digital transformations that have gone wrong, however, costing some organisations dearly, so what measures can companies take to ensure success? The key to success starts long before the implementation itself begins and relies on: Successful system selection;  A clear understanding of existing business processes;  Key user/management buy-in;  Selecting the correct partner;  A willingness to embrace change; and Understanding your data. Taking time before implementation to focus on the above will help ensure you enter the transformation prepared for an optimal outcome.  This will not only result in a smooth implementation, but by understanding your data and your business requirements, you will also be able to see the true potential of your new solution and help drive your business forward. At the recent Chartered Accountants Technology Conference, held in January 2024, we had the pleasure of hearing from two Irish organisations that recently underwent significant digital transformations.  We heard their stories, alongside the lessons they learned from their own implementation projects and the benefits each delivered. Glanbia’s HANA solution First, we heard from Eoin Butler, Finance Systems Centre of Excellence Lead with Glanbia plc, who shared the global nutrition group’s experience implementing the SAP S/4HANA solution.  S/4HANA is a ready-to-run cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. With operations in 32 countries and annual group revenue exceeding $5.4 billion, Glanbia needed a scalable solution with proven capacity to handle the needs of a complex global business.  The vision at the outset, Butler explained, was to “digitise the Glanbia business to drive value”.  It was agreed early on that a brownfield approach would be used for the engagement. This is usually the case if the existing system has been in use for some time and may require significant modifications or integrations during the migration.  In Glanbia’s case, Butler noted that the brownfield approach was one of the key reasons for the project’s success. Although a complex global business, Glanbia opted to work with just one single global instance of SAP ERP Central Component (ECC).  Because the project involved significant customisations and integrations with Glanbia’s existing system, these requirements were considered as a key aspect of the solution selection process.  Already a SAP customer for over 20 years, Glanbia opted to stay within the SAP ecosystem and migrate to a newer version of its existing solution. A significant challenge that emerged at an early stage in the project was the data already held on the existing system. An engagement was required to cleanse and fully understand this data before migration could take place.  Understanding your master data, and multiple data sources, is key to ensuring a successful migration or implementation. Taking time to understand and cleanse this data put Glanbia in a much better position to be able to improve reporting and efficiency.  Finally, Butler pointed out that any implementation on this scale cannot be done alone. A strong internal team, hardware and software partners, as well as helpful buy-in from SAP resulted in a successful implementation for Glanbia. Although there were benefits in finance, such as upgrades to the credit function, the new general ledger module within the SAP solution and profitability analysis, most of the benefits were technological and under the hood, laying the foundation to make Glanbia tech-ready for years to come. Cullen Cleaning Services Cullen Cleaning Services (CCS) is a commercial contract cleaning company operating across Europe. Headquartered in Dublin, its clients include household names such as Primark, River Island and H&M.  At this year’s Chartered Accountants Ireland Technology Conference, Brian Flannery, Chief Financial Officer with CCS, outlined the company’s experience implementing a Dynamics 365 Business Central solution with a business intelligence (BI) warehouse reporting solution on top. Flannery covered the evolving role of today’s finance leader in such a project, which involves leading people through digital change.  In the case of CCS, Flannery noted that the implementation had “accelerated the digital transformation in [the] business”.  Pivotal role of finance leaders The top priorities for CFOs set out in a 2024 Executive Priorities Survey by management consultancy Gartner included: transformation; improving finance metrics; leading change management; and  improving the finance function.  As accountants and finance leaders, we have the skillset to deliver on these priorities. More than that, there is an expectation that we play a central role in leading digital transformation and driving high standards in systems and reporting. Before its migration, CCS had a mainly paper-based solution, requiring team members to enter the same data multiple times while also relying heavily on Microsoft Excel for data manipulation and reporting. It was identified that the move to the cloud would help reduce manual labour by integrating with other solutions. Ultimately, integration improved the accuracy of the company’s data, thereby facilitating greater collaboration between departments. Integrating previously isolated data sources and reducing data entry time provided deeper insight to company management, improving the speed and quality of decision-making. Flannery emphasised the importance of treating system selection and partner selection as two distinct processes.  Although the first partner you speak with may have the solution that meets your needs, it is still worth talking to additional partners.  The partner you choose will become a key player in your implementation journey and, as Flannery put it during his presentation, “becomes an additional employee”.   Like a disruptive employee, a disruptive implementation partner can cause damage that no amount of planning or preparation can help you recover from. Finally, after ‘go live’, Brian stressed the importance of taking time to conduct a review: has the project been a success, and have your goals been met? It is quite often the case that system implementations go live even though parts of the team using it still have unmet requirements.  Review and improve It is important to track additional requirement gaps that arise during the implementation and address them after the new system has gone live as ‘phase two’ of the project.  Scope creep is a looming risk for every digital project; focusing on the key deliverables and timelines is paramount.  The additional scope should be noted and readdressed after the go-live date, if not business critical, because you are never truly finished with digital transformation. So, where is CCS? The company has a fully integrated solution using modern Application Programming Interface (API) integrations. It relies heavily on Optical Character Recognition to automate the accounts payable and data entry processes.  In addition to a Business Central solution, CCS has implemented a full BI reporting solution, sitting on top of the ERP solution and assisting with the preparation of management accounts.  This has taken one day off the month-end close process – an additional day for finance staff to focus on other value-added tasks. Focus on people After reviewing the project, Flannery noted some key takeaways he would keep in mind for any future transformation projects.  The key point to note here is that all these takeaways are people-focused – not technical-focused. For a transformation to be successful, it will be entirely dependent on people.  These systems work. There are thousands of references and case studies worldwide attesting to this, but whether your solution works for you depends entirely on how you approach soft skills and the implementation process itself. The four key points to remember are: Do not under-resource; Communicate clearly and thoroughly; Remember, change does not equal transformation; and Celebrate the wins. To finish, Flannery shared a quote from Albert Einstein: “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existence.” Reluctance to embrace technology and change will be the number one occupational hazard facing accountants over the next decade, but it will be people and relationships that drive the successful implementation of new technology.  Future leaders may not intimately understand this technology, but they do understand the importance of embracing a change mindset and working with their colleagues and partners to achieve it.    Conor Flanagan is ERP Lead with Storm Technology and a member of the Technology Committee of Chartered Accountants Ireland

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Comment
(?)

The case for a pro-business agenda in the local elections

Cormac Lucey outlines his suggestions for an election manifesto that, he believes, would protect and sustain the Irish economy into the future  This June, voters in the Republic will go to the polls to vote in local and European elections. What would represent a sensible pro-business agenda to promote in these elections? Here are my ideas: 1. Tackling skewed public debate While media debate understandably focuses on public questions that often revolve around public spending, the simple fact of the matter is that far more people work in the private sector than in the public sector.  CSO data indicates that, at the end of 2023, just 20 percent of employees worked in the public sector. Given that the private sector generates our income and our wealth, why are its concerns so overlooked in public debate?  2. Cutting down on public spending High public spending, even through the exchequer, is heavily dependent on tax revenues from the multinational sector. My estimates suggest that in 2022, just over half of Ireland’s total tax take came directly (corporation tax) and indirectly (PAYE, VAT, etc.) from the foreign direct investment (FDI) sector.  Even though some of these FDI tax revenue streams may prove temporary, the Irish State has entered ongoing spending commitments based on the assumption that they will continue indefinitely.  3. Promoting indigenous business Economic and commercial policy should be primarily directed at promoting the indigenous sector. Our current national prosperity depends on revenue streams from FDI that are ultimately controlled by people outside the State. We should use those streams to invest in our future and build up our economic capacity.  4. Holding public officials to account The primary job of elected political officials is to hold unelected public officials to account. The recent RTÉ saga has, at its heart, been a story about the failure of those who were supposedly directing the organisation to adequately hold executive management to account. Was the lack of managerial accountability at RTÉ an exception or the rule? I fear it was the rule. 5. Improving State performance Why is State performance so lamentably weak across so many important areas? When we examine the public management of key national issues – such as housing, health, crime and immigration – our leaders demonstrate powerlessness and ineffectiveness.  Confronted by a complex web of constraints – managerial, legal, administrative and economic – public service leaders have repeatedly displayed a worrying incapacity. 6. Reducing public sector pay Why are Irish public servants paid so much? In the fourth quarter of 2023, public sector workers were paid, on average, €35.08 per hour. This was 32.6 percent more per hour than the €26.45 their private sector counterparts received.  These figures are before we take into account the gold-plated pensions public sector workers get. 7. Curbing inflated costs Ireland was named the most expensive country in the EU for goods and services by Eurostat in June 2023, with prices a staggering 46 percent higher than the average across the bloc. How can the State address the high costs of the Irish economy if it is the direct cause of high costs? The focus of Irish politics needs to change. It seems to me that our political class is looking in the wrong direction. Rather than investing in the future, it is focused on short-term results. A new approach is needed. *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the April/May 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.  Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
News
(?)

Turning the dial on gender inequality

The Gender Balance Working Group, a sub group of the Diversity & Inclusion Committee, focuses on issues related to gender equality, advocates for and supports the female members of Chartered Accountants Ireland The need for advocates for women in the Irish workforce stretches right back to the marriage bar in the Republic of Ireland.  The marriage bar required women to leave the labour force once they were married and the consequences of this legislation have lived long in the Irish psyche, affecting all women.  As Ireland strives to achieve greater equality for women, the Gender Balance Working Group is ideally placed to advocate for female Chartered Accountants in the profession. As a voluntary member-led working group, our personal and professional experience plays a central role in shaping our ongoing dialogue.  Raising awareness of the need for equitable opportunities for women – including equitable access to employment, compensation and development opportunities – comes at a pivotal moment, following the Government’s introduction of gender pay reporting metrics designed to close the gender pay gap in Ireland.  The Gender Balance Working Group supports Chartered Accountants Ireland’s recognition of International Women’s Day (IWD), celebrated annually on 8 March both nationally and internationally.  This year’s IWD celebrations marked the launch of the Women’s Mentoring Circle, an exciting new career support service, providing a space for women in the Chartered Accountancy profession to connect and collaborate. The first Mentoring Circle will take place at Chartered Accountants House, 47–49 Pearse Street, Dublin 2, at 5pm on Thursday, 18 April. The Gender Balance Working Group also seeks to address issues ranging from the need to break down biases impeding women’s ability to climb the career ladder, to the challenges women face when trying to balance professional and personal responsibilities and ambitions. Ultimately, we want to do all we can to improve the representation of female diversity in the Irish workforce.  Our working group has run a series of events, both in-person and virtual, inviting female Chartered Accountants to share their experiences: why they have chosen the profession; the career challenges they have faced; and their advice for the next generation coming behind them.  A recurring series in Accountancy Ireland called ‘My Story So Far’ continues to feature the stories and insights of a range of established and successful female Chartered Accountants. Its aim is to demonstrate to others that they should never feel as if they are taking on challenges in isolation.  The Gender Balance Working Group will continue to listen, and respond to, the needs, views and priorities of the female members of Chartered Accountants Ireland.  Equality is a journey, not a destination. It is important that the work this group is doing today sets a precedent for the next group of advocates to take on and advance further.  To find out more about the Gender Balance Working Group and other D&I resources, visit: charteredaccountants.ie/diversity-and-inclusion  

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Careers
(?)

“I remind myself routinely that I can do anything I put my mind to”

Maria O’Connell talks to Accountancy Ireland about how, through resilience, adaptability and the support of a strong female network, she has achieved career success I decided to become a Chartered Accountant when I was 16 after reading an accountancy career brochure. I didn’t know any Chartered Accountants at that stage and my school didn’t teach business subjects.  When I was growing up in Cork in the 1980s, career opportunities were scarce and often viewed through the lens of emigration. Qualifying as a Chartered Accountant seemed to offer an exciting career path with many opportunities, travel options and income security.  I qualified with PwC in 1989. The foundational skills underpinning my career – business management, communication, problem solving and technical knowledge – were laid during these years.  The Chartered Accountants Ireland training programme nurtured a highly transferable and versatile skillset, which has been integral to my career success.  Drawing on my bank of achievements  Keen to travel, I moved to PwC in Milan, Italy, in 1989. I learned to speak and work in Italian, integrated into a new working environment and experienced a beautiful country, people and culture. Then, in 1992, I interviewed for a junior finance role with JP Morgan in Milan but was offered the role of Bond Settlements Manager. I had no experience working in the Italian government bond market – a prerequisite for such a role.  However, the Director of Operations at JP Morgan in Milan was a Chartered Accountant and understood the value of my training and related skills. He could see an alternative approach to filling the position.  I took a chance and moved into this entirely unknown world. The job was exciting, challenging, fascinating and demanding. I loved every minute of it. My role at JP Morgan was the start of an exciting career journey, leading me to other incredibly fulfilling financial services roles in Italy and Ireland – roles that rarely followed the traditional accountancy career pathway. When I returned to Dublin in 1994, I focused my job search on companies in the developing International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) and that took me into the asset management industry. Always curious and genuinely interested in people, I continually seek new challenges and opportunities to add value and learn. These traits have propelled me to leadership positions covering strategic, business-critical, transformational and governance initiatives in global-facing organisations, such as Bank of Ireland Securities Services, Bank of Ireland Asset Management, Irish Funds and State Street Global Advisors. I have also been extremely privileged to work with highly talented people with vision and foresight who have always focused on my abilities, experience and potential. These role models provided me with precious opportunities for further development. Of course, I also encountered hurdles as I navigated my way, but every hard-earned success added to my internal bank of achievements, which I draw on to this day when my confidence falters or a challenge seems insurmountable. I remind myself routinely that I can do anything I put my mind to. As women, I think we often tend to focus on what we can’t do rather than what we can. Drawing strength from our bank of achievements will always direct us to our ‘can-dos’. Aligning my career with my life priorities  By 2004, I had three children aged six, eight and 10, and a fourth on the way. I decided to take a career break to focus on my family.  This decision was tough as I had invested so much in my career. Despite having a husband who shared the family workload and a flexible employer, I felt I was always letting someone down – my children, colleagues or clients.  Every family is different and we make our choices based on our unique set of circumstances. My decision to take a career break at that time was the choice that worked best for my family and me. Throughout my career, I have always tried to align my career with my life priorities. This choice was one of many steps on that alignment pathway.  Rebooting my career When I decided to return to work in 2013, my first port of call was Karin Lanigan, Head of Members Experience at Chartered Accountants Ireland, who gave me practical advice and guidance. I was lucky to secure a place on the first Reboot Your Career Programme, run by the Institute to support those returning to the workplace.  The course was invaluable in providing me with the confidence, toolkit and ready-made network to kick off my job search and set me on the next stage of my career journey.  It was not easy to return to the workplace after a nine-year break. Colleagues had passed me out on the promotion ladder, and the world of financial services had changed significantly following the financial crisis of 2008. I faced a very steep learning curve.  I was determined to learn as much as possible, however, concentrating on what I could achieve rather than on others who had moved ahead of me.  All the traits that had propelled my career forward in the past, resurfaced and I was able to move forward again in a senior leadership role at the EU headquarters of one of the largest asset managers in the world.  My advice to anyone rebooting their career would be to leverage the supports available from Chartered Accountants Ireland, your own network and to tap into your existing bank of achievements.  Don’t compare your career with others; focus on your own motivations, what you want to achieve and then go for it. The power of the female network As a trainee Chartered Accountant, many of my new female friendships evolved quickly into a highly supportive and powerful network in which experiences, challenges and solutions were openly shared.  This precious network of women, built up over many years, now extends to diverse roles and disciplines beyond the accountancy profession as well as different generations and geographies.  Building positive relationships as we move throughout our lives ensures that we stay connected with each other – and that we are not merely connections on a list.  None of us signed up to this network ‘overtly’, but we all understand the unwritten rule that anytime we reach out for advice, we will find support. Our natural empathy as women, innate ability to connect with and learn from each other and openness to share experiences are powerful tools in driving and embedding change. More women are holding senior decision-making roles, yet we are still navigating structures designed to cater to a single gender order.  Our networks are critical in harnessing our collective strengths as we and our male colleagues reimagine more equitable, diverse and inclusive structures.  I am grateful to be part of a network of diverse, insightful, talented and kind women. Our networks are intrinsic drivers of positive change and sustain us through tough times. Key lessons as a Chartered Accountant My career as a Chartered Accountant has far surpassed anything my 16-year-old self could have dreamed of. A kaleidoscope of experiences has gifted me these key lessons: Seek out those exciting, diverse, non-traditional roles. Don’t let others discourage you.  Stay curious, always looking for new challenges and new things to learn. Draw strength from your bank of achievements. You can do anything you want to.  Periodically assess how your career aligns with your life priorities. Don’t be afraid to make changes when they fall out of sync. Focus on what you want to achieve and what motivates you. Don’t compare your career with those of others. Value, nurture and leverage your female network. It is a precious resource.  Enjoy the journey. It will take you to amazing places. Maria O’Connell  B.Comm., DPA, FCA, is a consultant specialising in board governance and business strategy. She was formerly Vice President of Business Strategy and Governance at State Street Global Advisors Europe Limited

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Sustainability
(?)

Stemming the tide of greenwashing lies

Sustainability credentials are big business in 2024, but not all are genuine. Dee Moran looks at ongoing EU efforts to curb greenwashing through regulation Over the last number of years, investors, consumers and regulators have put companies under increasing pressure to be ‘green’.  Being green is big business. Consumers will pay a premium for sustainable products and investors are increasingly looking to invest in companies that are perceived as sustainable. Banks also want to lend to businesses showing green credentials.   This desire to be ‘green’ has, unfortunately, led to some entities not being wholly truthful about, or exaggerating, their green credentials. So-called ‘greenwashing’ has become so widespread that many stakeholders – including investors, regulators, consumers and company directors – are calling for action to curb it.  The latest PwC Investor Survey, published in January 2024, included responses from 345 investors and analysts in 30 countries – including 38 who invested in, or covered, companies in Ireland.   Ninety-seven percent of this 38-strong cohort believe that corporate reporting on sustainability performance contains unsupported claims. Globally, the corresponding figure stands at 94 percent.  The characteristics of greenwashing So, what is greenwashing? There is no global definition of ‘greenwashing’ but, in essence, it involves misleading consumers by giving a false impression of a product’s environmental impact or benefits.  It can be unintentional. One example is the use of vague and unspecific language, such as describing a product as ‘eco-friendly’ due to its use of recycled packaging while not conducting any actual research into the sustainability, or otherwise, of the raw materials used in that product.  Or, it can be intentional greenwashing, such as the Volkswagen scandal, whereby the German car manufacturer was found to have intentionally rigged its emissions testing to deliver greener results.  When this came to light in 2015, Volkswagen’s share price fell by 20 percent, wiping more than €13 billion off its capitalisation.  Greenwashing has become so prevalent that Planet Tracker, the UK-based sustainable finance think tank, has identified six distinct types: greencrowding; greenhushing; greenlabelling; greenlighting; greenrinsing; and greenshifting. Greencrowding is where an entity adopts a group initiative, such as forming an alliance, and then progresses at the pace of the slowest participant. While collaboration with other entities in a similar industry to create goals for sustainability initiatives can be beneficial, joint statements need to be clear about what will be achieved. Otherwise, tracking progress can become challenging. Greenhushing is where entities deliberately underplay, under-report or hide their environmental, social and governance (ESG) or green credentials to evade scrutiny because, for example, their sustainability practice might not be as impressive as claimed. Greenlabelling is where entities call a product or service ‘green’ or ‘sustainable’ but there is no evidence to support the assertion. Greenlighting is where an entity focuses its marketing on a particularly green feature of its operations or products, diverting attention from other damaging environmental practices. Greenrinsing is where entities modify their ESG targets before they are achieved, thereby avoiding being held accountable for, or actually achieving, their goals. Greenshifting is when entities imply that the consumer is at fault and shift the blame on to them. The potential effects of greenwashing The effects of greenwashing vary from fairly harmless to potentially very serious.  The more consumers hear about greenwashing, the less likely they are to believe any green claims made by companies and organisations as is evidenced in the PwC Investor Survey, outlined above.  Consumers purchase sustainable goods and services to play their part in protecting the environment, but greenwashing disrupts this, and consumers become cynical.  Furthermore, entities engaging in greenwashing tactics potentially harm not just themselves, but all other entities engaging with sustainable practices and particularly those companies with genuine green products or operations. Once trust is lost, it is hard to regain.   EU actions to mitigate greenwashing Regulation to prevent greenwashing has, until recently, been limited. Much of the enforcement has been performed by advertising regulators who have moved to ban misleading greenwashing ads, for example.  In the UK, Unilever placed an advertisement claiming that Persil laundry detergent was ‘kinder to our planet’ but didn’t explain how and, consequently, it was banned by the Advertising Standards Authority on the basis that the claim was unsubstantiated.  The Advertising Standards Authority of Ireland (ASAI) received 28 complaints about a sponsored article in which a celebrity referred to the use of the Land Rover Defender as “planting the seeds of a more sustainable life”.  This was held to be in breach of the ASAI Code on the basis that “evidence demonstrating that the vehicle justified being associated with sustainability claims, albeit qualified, has not been submitted.”   Where the article asserted that “mild hybrid tech cuts down on the amount of fuel,” the ASAI found that this was likely to mislead consumers due to the omission of a comparison with any other mode of transport. The ASAI then concluded that the claim should not be used again in its current format. The European Union (EU) is very focused on reducing greenwashing and lending transparency to corporate behaviour. Some of the regulations that have been – or are in the process of being – approved are outlined below. Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation The EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), introduced in 2021, requires financial market participants and financial advisors to evaluate and disclose sustainability-related data and policies at entity, service and product level.   The aim is to provide standardisation of the language used and to categorise investment products by how sustainable they are. Disclosure requirements are applied to each category.    Under the SFDR, all funds are classified into one of three categories: Article 6 Funds need not incorporate any sustainability information into the investment process (for example, oil producers). Article 8 Funds should promote environmental characteristics and have good governance practices.   Article 9 Funds should make a positive impact on society or the environment through sustainable investment and have a non-financial objective at the core of their offering.  In its February 2024 Regulatory and Supervisory Outlook Report, the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) referred to “a new phenomenon of understating how green a product is, known as ‘green bleaching’”.  Green bleaching can occur where a fund management company does not want to risk non-compliance with the more onerous requirements of Article 9.  Therefore, it categorises a fund under a category with less onerous requirements, which results in inaccurate disclosures.   The CBI report also highlighted one of the priority initiatives in addressing climate change and net-zero transition as “scrutinising and mitigating the risk of greenwashing in the promotion and sale of financial products to investors”. The EU Taxonomy Regulation The EU Taxonomy Regulation is a classification system establishing a list of environmentally sustainable economic activities; essentially, a common language for everyone.  It establishes six environmental objectives: Climate change mitigation; Climate change adaptation; Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; Transition to a circular economy; Pollution prevention and control; and Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.  In order to be considered aligned with the taxonomy, an entity must adhere to at least one of the environmental objectives and the related technical criteria, do no significant harm to the other objectives and meet minimum safeguards regarding human and labour rights. Disclosure obligations will apply from 1 January 2024 with respect to the 2023 financial year. In theory, this should create security for investors and help companies become more climate friendly. It should also prevent market fragmentation – something that has caused issues in the past. Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive In terms of reporting, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) – which commenced on 1 January 2024 for certain companies – is focused on improving transparency, particularly with the disclosures required to be made under the directive.  While it has not been stated that the CSRD will specifically prevent greenwashing, it will make greenwashing more difficult, given the significant requirements of the directive. These include the following: The framework underpinning the CSRD is the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which is a set of 12 standards covering ESG metrics. Entities will have to report on their ESG metrics, as will their competitors, making information more comparable and therefore more transparent and less prone to exaggeration, omission or suppression. The requirement to complete a double materiality assessment whereby a company must consider its impact, not only from a financial perspective, but also from the perspective of its impact on people and the environment. • There are a significant number of additional requirements over and above those required under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive or the voluntary frameworks, both quantitative and qualitative, which will leave less room for ambiguity and the individual interpretation of sustainability information. Mandatory independent assurance of company ESG information will be required under the CSRD. Initially, this will be limited assurance, but it is expected that reasonable assurance will be required by 2028. Therefore, companies will need to ensure that they have in place appropriate processes and controls – similar to financial reporting – so that they are in a position to comply with the new regulatory obligations. The requirement for external assurance should, above all, bring with it the trust investors have been looking for. As a single framework, the CSRD will bring increased comparability to ESG reporting, greatly assisted by the mandatory electronic XBRL tagging of the report. Investors will now be able to compare information provided by companies and make investment decisions based on this information, which will be more granular in nature, thereby offering a higher level of detail.  Draft Green Claims Directive The Green Claims Directive is the latest piece of regulation introduced by the EU to tackle greenwashing and is an important step in increasing transparency and trust in relation to environmental claims.  The European Commission first proposed this directive in March 2023 following the publication of a joint report by the European Parliament’s environment and internal market committees.  The report followed a European study in 2020, which found that more than 53 percent of environmental claims in the EU were misleading, vague or unfounded. The proposals for the Green Claims Directive include: Setting out detailed rules on substantiating and communicating explicit environmental claims; Ensuring that companies carry out an assessment to substantiate environmental claims on a host of requirements – if the claim concerns the whole product or a part of it, for example, reporting greenhouse gases offsets in a transparent way and looking at all significant environmental aspects and impacts; Potential penalties, such as a temporary exclusion from public procurement tenders or fines of at least four percent of annual turnover. The directive is due to come into force on a gradual basis, depending on company size, from 1 January 2026. Proactive approach All of these developments are very positive and demonstrate the EU’s proactive approach to regulating against greenwashing. The European Parliament’s rapporteur for the Environment Committee, Cyrus Engerer, has said, “it is time to put an end to greenwashing. Our agreement on this (Green Claims) text ends the proliferation of deceitful green claims which have tricked consumers for far too long.”   Regulation will work only if there is enforcement, however. Individual countries need to ensure that they have the processes in place to punish those who do not adhere to the regulations. Dee Moran is Professional Accountancy Lead with Chartered Accountants Ireland

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE

Change the filter and boost your wellbeing

Embracing a positive perspective is a key ingredient for personal wellbeing. Aaron O’Connell asks you to consider whether you’re a glass half full or glass half empty person, and he provides a useful exercise to help you view life with a different filter and to boost your well-being. Some questions for you to consider Do you have tendency to see things positively where you are focusing on the good things that happen around you, or do you focus on the negatives, those obstacles and problems you face?  If you have a to-do list and you manage to successfully complete 19 out of 20 things, are you happy about the long list of things you’ve accomplished, or are you upset about that one thing that you didn’t get to finish? It’s your choice A hundred good things (little highlights) and one bad thing (a little low-light) might happen during your day. You have the opportunity to appreciate and remember all the good things, or to focus only on the bad things. You can look at life through a different filter. Embracing a positive perspective One useful exercise I recommend to the athletes, students and business people I work with, and indeed practice myself every night at bedtime, is to recall seven positive things that happen during the day. It’s something I picked up from internationally acclaimed sport psychologist, Dr. Terry Orlick. Before you sleep, look back over your day chronologically and highlight those good things that happened. They don’t have to be major events. Little highlights will do. “I had a lovely breakfast.” “The sun was shining today.” “I got a call from a good friend.” “I went for a lovely walk today.” You could begin this exercise by recalling three positives and increase by one each time after a few days. Look for different ones each day. As Dr. Orlick would say, it’s like “using a yellow magic marker to highlight all the good things you do, see, hear, taste, feel, and learn in a day.” Even better, write them down in a journal or on your phone. You’ll get a buzz out of revisiting and re-reading these when you’ve had a tough day. Using a different filter and living with a positive perspective is like becoming your own best friend. It’ll change your outlook in life for the good. Challenge yourself to look for seven highlights a day. Once you start looking for them and finding them, your day and your life immediately become better. You’ll experience a boost in wellbeing along with an increase in gratitude. Aaron O’Connell is the owner of Mind Your Performance. He provides consultancy and training in mental skills, mental well-being, and performance enhancement for the education, business, and sports sector. Thrive is the Institute’s dedicated wellbeing hub which provides emotional and practical support to our members, students, and their family members for life. Should you find yourself in a difficult situation, the team at Thrive can help steer you through life’s ups and downs.  Talk to us today on mobile: (353) 86 024 3294 or email us.  

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
Member Profile
(?)

RSM Ireland poised for accelerated growth

Niall May, the new Managing Partner of RSM Ireland, outlines his strategic plans for the firm at a pivotal point in its evolution Niall May, FCA, was appointed Managing Partner of RSM Ireland in January following the recent announcement of a strategic investment in the firm by RSM UK. A partner and Head of Audit at RSM Ireland for close to 10 years, May has more than 25 years’ experience in professional services. He succeeds John Glennon, one of RSM Ireland’s founding partners, who will remain with the firm as a board member and Head of Strategy. Here, May talks to Accountancy Ireland about RSM Ireland’s plans to accelerate investment in service offerings and increase its share of the middle market. Can you give us an overview of RSM Ireland as it stands currently? We have 200 employees and ambitions to grow our headcount significantly in the short term.  We are an independent member of RSM International, the world’s sixth largest network of assurance, tax and consulting firms, and our business is centred on three key service lines – audit, tax and consulting, with a particular focus on middle market businesses, both locally and globally.  We work with domestic and international clients across a range of sectors, particularly life sciences, financial services, public sector, technology and media and telecommunications.  More than 65 percent of our audit and tax clients are active globally. Key for us is delivering innovative services to help them achieve their business goals.  The strength of RSM globally means we can work with member firms in other countries to serve our global clients with a presence here in Ireland and our domestic clients active in overseas markets. Our consultancy business spans a wide range of solutions, which include transformation, HR and change, finance support solutions, forensic investigations, restructuring advisory, technology and corporate finance services.  It is my ambition as Managing Partner to position RSM Ireland as the advisor of choice to the middle market and drive competition in the professional services sector. Talk us through the firm’s evolution since it was established in 1987 as Ryan Glennon & Company. The firm was established nearly 40 years ago by John Glennon and Liam Ryan and continues to have deep roots in the Irish business community.  We made the strategic decision to join the RSM International network in 2016 and that has been a game-changer in the firm’s evolution.  The RSM International network spans 120 countries with over 64,000 people in more than 800 offices. It has a very wide reach, particularly in the key markets we serve globally. Since 2016, RSM Ireland has doubled in size in both turnover and headcount and we have significantly increased the strength and depth of our services.  Our view is that all business now is essentially global and Ireland, in particular, is a very open economy. RSM is also very integrated and collaborative across borders, so we benefit from sharing skills, insights and resources.  RSM International saw record year-on-year growth in revenue of 16 percent with global revenues of US$9.4 billion for the 12 months to December 2023, and a 13 percent increase in global headcount.  Over the same period, RSM Ireland achieved revenue and people growth of 19 percent and 21 percent respectively. Tell us about RSM UK’s recent investment in RSM Ireland. We announced the strategic investment from RSM UK in November 2023. It is very significant for us because it will drive greater access to talent, technology, support and the services we can offer the corporate market. It will accelerate our ability to create long-term growth and drive increased competition in the professional services sector in Ireland. It also underlines the wider confidence in Ireland’s economy and the opportunities that exist in this market.  As well as increasing our physical footprint, the investment gives us access to greater resources, while better positioning the firm to target investments, invest in talent and technology and offer new services.  It will also allow us to create more opportunities for our staff, both new and existing. We aim to increase our graduate intake this year to over 50 while also creating exciting opportunities for experienced hires. What are the biggest changes you have seen in your market since joining RSM Ireland?  While Ireland remains an attractive destination for global companies to locate, build and grow their businesses, we are facing challenges right now relating to our infrastructural capacity, housing and energy supply.  We need to accelerate our response to overcoming these challenges so that Ireland can remain competitive.  Within the accountancy market, we are seeing a definite trend towards consolidation. For RSM Ireland, we could see that the investment from RSM UK offered a natural route to supporting and accelerating our next phase of the growth of our business. What will your strategic priorities be in your new role?  Looking first at developments in the global economy, I see opportunities to further grow our international client base.  A key ambition is to expand our teams across all service lines and develop new services, particularly in response to rising demand for environmental, social and governance, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence services.   We will be looking to develop our sector expertise further across financial services, life sciences, technology and media and telecoms.  Building strength in our global network will also be key though the RSM International network and expanding our International Desk Programme in key markets including the US. For the accountants you employ, what emerging skills are you focusing on now to future-proof their roles?  Embracing technology and adapting to ongoing changes in the world of work is key for all professionals.  Accountants, in particular, are very good at understanding the latest changes and developments and, more importantly, understanding the wider developments in business operations and the related risks.  We invest quite significantly in supporting our people as they adopt new technologies, and we will continue to do so. This is key for our business, because we absolutely must be able to understand our clients’ needs, and support and bring value to their business through meaningful, in-depth knowledge. I anticipate greater sustained spend on technologies to support further process automation and data analytics. This will be key to enabling our people to deliver rich insights to help clients improve business performance and stay ahead of developments in their markets.  What are your expectations for the economy in Ireland and globally in the months ahead?  On a positive note, current trends and projections point to calming inflation. There is now an expectation in Europe and beyond that interest rates will start to come down as soon as June.  I think we can expect to see a loosening of Central Bank fiscal policy and improved GDP forecasts, which will be positive for business. Business resilience will be tested in other ways, however. The war for talent will continue to rage and global tax developments – for example, Pillar Two tax reform and other initiatives – will bring their own challenges. We will also potentially have a new US administration, which may see changes in certain US policies. Despite all of this, I genuinely do believe that business leaders have good reason to feel more optimistic as they look ahead following a particularly turbulent period.

Apr 04, 2024
READ MORE
...31323334353637383940...

The latest news to your inbox

Please enter a valid email address You have entered an invalid email address.

Useful links

  • Current students
  • Becoming a student
  • Knowledge centre
  • Shop
  • District societies

Get in touch

Dublin HQ

Chartered Accountants
House, 47-49 Pearse St,
Dublin 2, D02 YN40, Ireland

TEL: +353 1 637 7200
Belfast HQ

The Linenhall
32-38 Linenhall Street, Belfast,
Antrim, BT2 8BG, United Kingdom

TEL: +44 28 9043 5840

Connect with us

Something wrong?

Is the website not looking right/working right for you?
Browser support
CAW Footer Logo-min
GAA Footer Logo-min
CCAB-I Footer Logo-min
ABN_Logo-min

© Copyright Chartered Accountants Ireland 2020. All Rights Reserved.

☰
  • Terms & conditions
  • Privacy statement
  • Event privacy notice
  • Sitemap
LOADING...

Please wait while the page loads.