As people across the world condemn the attack by Russia on Ukraine, they also want to show their support through donations and using their influence for humanitarian intervention. Professional accountants will find themselves in positions of influence with many stakeholders including clients, employers, employees, and local communities.  Níall Fitzgerald, Head of Ethics and Governance outlines some practical considerations for accountants and business leaders in this context:    Fundraising for humanitarian or other reliefs People and organisations are looking to help the millions of Ukrainians displaced by the invasion by donating directly or running fundraiser events. Be aware of fraud risk and recommend controls that ensure the safeguard of any monies raised and that they are used for the purpose for which they were raised. Ensure the necessary licences are obtained for any public fundraising activity. Be clear on the purpose for the funds and how they will be channelled to the beneficiaries. Ensure compliance with national charity law and check that charitable donations are only made to a properly registered charity in your jurisdiction. Social media Understandably, many people and corporates are sharing their views on Russia's  invasion of Ukraine via social media. The distinction between when a view is a personal view or that of the organisation where a person works is not always clear. If you are an officer of a company, e.g. a director, chief executive, or the public relations officer, and you are commenting on a matter related to your area of responsibility, then it is very difficult to separate your view from the corporate view. For this reason, many organisations will have clear corporate social media policies in place and that is the first reference point if in doubt. However, before reacting to a colleague's personal post, it is important to also consider their right to hold and express an opinion. There can be a cultural aspect to this within an organisation, especially where respect, tolerance, diversity and inclusion, and psychological safety are highly valued. The specific circumstances of the person expressing the view might also be taken into account, for example their emotional proximity to the issue.  Developing corporate positions Many organisations are using their influence for good by publicly denouncing the invasion of Ukraine, with some going further to withdraw from investments and business operations in Russia, and any dealings with Russian state-owned entities. These decisions are not always the most straightforward to implement. Legal and other expert advice should be sought to consider how an organisation can address contractual obligations, restructure, and relocate operations. Many Russian citizens are against the actions of the Russian Government, and Russian employees, contractors, etc., should receive fair treatment and not be discriminated against. Reporting progress and being transparent on these positions, including any setbacks, is very important as corporates will be held to account by stakeholders and members of the public to honour their commitments. Careful thought should be given before making any wide-sweeping statements. The global economy, with its complex interconnected markets, creates practical difficulties when seeking to divest of everything connected to Russia.   Whistleblowing and speaking up Clearly defined and well-communicated whistleblowing and speaking-up policies and procedures can increase an organisation’s awareness of any weaknesses in it’s internal controls and practices relating to sanctions, anti-money and anti-bribery and corruption compliance. Communicating to employees the organisation’s position in relation to this crisis and reminding them about whistleblowing and speaking-up policies and procedures, promotes a safe environment in which individuals feel comfortable to raise any concerns about the organisation’s actions, or inactions. Corporate reporting While the scale of the impact of this crisis on organisations will differ, it will dwarfed by the impact on millions of Ukrainians. Organisations have important social obligations and responsibilities to corporate stakeholders. Accountants should ensure transparency and accountability in corporate reporting by highlighting the impact of the crisis on the organisation’s operations, asset valuations and exposure to liabilities. Examples of the sources of this impact include: supply-chain disruption; the cost of ceasing operations in Russia or the conflict/invasion zones; rising commodity prices; inaccessibility of certain markets due to trade or travel restrictions; difficulty maintaining required levels of capital reserves; and loss of key customers. Accountants will have a central role in collecting, measuring, and reporting the necessary information and ensuring it is reported in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements and relevant reporting frameworks. They should also understand the limitations to their expertise and call for the involvement of experts where necessary. Directors and senior management will need to consider expert advice when making highly judgemental decisions on values and estimates and in determining the future implications for the organisation.    Boundaries between personal life and professional life Negative emotions, such as anger and fear, increase the risk of self-defeating behaviours. The developing situation in Ukraine will understandably evoke such emotions in many. In this context, it is useful to refer to guidance issued by the CCAB bodies, in July 2021, to help accountants consider and distinguish if their personal behaviour could be viewed as conduct that might discredit the profession. While the facts and circumstances of every situation will differ, the CCAB guidance provides some examples of such behaviours, including the use of seriously offensive or threatening language causing distress, or threatening behaviour, towards a client or a member of the public outside of the work environment.  This non-exhaustive list of considerations may need to be reconsidered as the crisis in Ukraine develops. In many situations, increasing ethical awareness or the ability to address an ethical dilemma requires reflection. Professional accountants may find it useful to refer to, or circulate to professional accountancy staff, the Chartered Accountants Ireland Ethics Quick Reference Guide available from our Ethics Resource Centre. This article was adapted for members overseas from an article written by Níall Fitzgerald on the Institute’s Ethics Resource Centre.

Ahead of the UK’s general election on Thursday 4 July, we take a look at the tax policies of the two largest parties in Northern Ireland.  The DUP’s tax policies and promises  The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) published its full manifesto last week. The party continues to argue that further work is needed on the Windsor Framework and “we will continue to argue the case for the full primacy of the United Kingdom internal market, and we will continue to reject the undermining of its integrity………..In October, as part of the NI Assembly vote on the current arrangements, we will not hesitate to vote against their continued application and, drawing upon the new mechanisms at our disposal, we will continue our quest through the inbuilt review.”  A lower rate of corporation tax for Northern Ireland also featured, something which the Institute has been campaigning on for many years. The Institute is currently developing a briefing paper on the benefits, challenges, and potential mitigations to any challenges of a lower rate of corporation tax for Northern Ireland which it plans to use as a mechanism to drive this issue forward.   The DUP’s analysis of a lower rate of corporation tax for Northern Ireland features on page 29 of their manifesto and reads as follows:  “Lowering the rate of corporation tax in Northern Ireland has been a longstanding DUP policy. This would boost Northern Ireland as an attractive investment opportunity, building on the strength, skill and ingenuity of our workforce. The minimum effective 15% rate in the Irish Republic places firms in Northern Ireland at a competitive disadvantage and we want to see this addressed. We continue to advocate for a reduction in corporate tax across the United Kingdom and DUP MPs opposed the increase in the main UK corporation tax rate from 19% to 25% in 2023.   The DUP believes there are a number of fundamental issues that require resolution with the Treasury before the powers to vary corporation tax rates - which are already provided for in law - can be enacted. We are clear that progress must be based on solid foundations. That means ensuring a process of implementation that protects spending on public services in the short to medium-term.”  DUP MPs will also campaign to:   Oppose the freeze on the personal tax allowance and higher rate income tax threshold  Seek further reductions in national insurance  Support an increase in the starting age for employee national insurance  Encourage the government to explore the merits of moving to single tax on all income, replacing income tax and national insurance  Freeze vehicle excise duty  Abolish VAT on domestic electricity bills  Maintain the freeze on fuel duty  Oppose any increase in insurance premium tax   Increase the tax-free childcare allowance from 20 percent to 35 percent  Remove the cap on tax free childcare above £2,000  Scrap VAT on school uniforms  Support the triple lock on state pensions   Support the personal allowance for pensioners always being above the amount of the state pension  Increase the VAT registration threshold for SMEs to £100,000 and then uprate it in line with inflation  Drive up the number of SMEs benefiting from tax reliefs  Ensure the national insurance liability for small businesses is fair: the Employment Allowance should be uprated in line with increases to the national living wage  Promote greater awareness of capital allowances and R&D tax reliefs among local businesses  Explore the potential introduction of an online sales tax targeting online corporates and marketplaces  Support robust efforts to crack down on global tax evading corporations  Aim for the VAT system to be better utilised to incentivise investments that promote improved productivity through low-carbon and green technologies  Continue to campaign for a reduction in VAT for hospitality across the UK, and   Expand UK research & development tax relief for small and medium sized enterprises to include capital expenditure.  In its 2022 Assembly Election manifesto, the DUP also argued that the necessary capacity did not exist for Northern Ireland to devolve additional fiscal powers. That remains its position at this time.   Sinn Fein’s tax policies  Sinn Fein published its full manifesto in mid-June, a 10 page document which did not contain any detail on tax pledges. However publicly, the party has taken a slightly different position to the DUP on the devolution of more fiscal powers arguing that although there are "important considerations" about the political and administrative capacity for Stormont to take on new responsibilities, the experiences of Scotland and Wales demonstrate that this capacity can be developed over time which "it is not a reason in itself to not consider devolution". 

The latest Tax Gap publications for 2022/23 were published last month by HMRC and set out how the tax gap has increased by £1.7 billion to £39.8 billion in absolute terms. In percentage terms the tax gap is 4.8 percent (5.2 percent 2021/22) of the £823.8 billion total theoretical tax liabilities for 2022/23. The tax gap is the difference between what HMRC expects the total tax take for 2022/23 to be, and the actual tax received. According to the statistics in the publications which are linked below, small businesses accounted for nearly two thirds of unpaid tax.   The largest components of the tax gap by tax type are the Corporation Tax gap and the Income Tax, National Insurance Contributions and Capital Gains Tax gap, both at a 34 percent share, followed by the VAT gap with a 20 percent share. As in previous years, the tax gap from small businesses is the largest component of the tax gap by taxpayer group which was a 60 percent share in 2022/23.   There was also strong year-on-year growth in HMRC’s tax receipts in these two years, most likely due to fiscal drag. You can read the published receipts figures on GOV.UK.  The 2022/23 Tax Gap publications are as follows:  Measuring tax gaps tables  Quality report: Measuring tax gaps, and  Measuring tax gaps 2024 edition: tax gap estimates for 2022 to 2023.   

Do you complete expenses and benefits returns? Or do you complete online filing for employment related securities? If so, you have a key role to play in ensuring returns are submitted by the 2023/24 filing deadline of 6 July 2024 and payments are made on time. The 2023/24 deadline to apply for a PAYE settlement agreement (PSA) is 5 July 2024, with payments due by 22 October 2024 (19 October 2024 if not paying electronically).  By way of reminder, from 6 April 2023, forms P11D and P11D(b) can only be submitted online by employers (except for the digitally excluded). Also, since 6 April 2023, an online service is available for employers and their agents to apply for a PSA.   It should also be noted that where Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) options are granted on or after 6 April 2024, although the statutory reporting deadline is 6 July following the end of the tax year, some plan rules require the employer to notify HMRC within 92 days of grant. If this is the case, failure to report within the deadline can lead to the option lapsing or becoming non-tax advantaged. We recommend that employers check any EMI plans urgently to ensure this deadline is not missed.     Here’s a reminder of the key deadlines:  6 July 2024 - deadline for submitting all 2023/24 P11D(b) and P11D forms, and the employee must receive their copy of the P11D  6 July 2024 – deadline for online reporting of the 2023/24 annual return in respect of employment related securities  19 July 2024 - deadline for non-electronic payment of Class 1A National Insurance Contributions (NIC) for 2023/24, and   22 July 2024 - deadline for electronic payment of Class 1A NIC for 2023/24.   Looking ahead to the future, we also remind you that from April 2026, the reporting and payment of income tax and Class 1A National Insurance Contributions on benefits in kind must be done via payroll software.  

In this week’s EU exit corner, we bring you the latest guidance updates and publications relevant to EU exit. The most recent Trader Support Service bulletin is also available and HMRC is warning about issues with license data flows between the Customs Declarations Service (“CDS”) and the Department for Business and Trade's (DBT) electronic licensing systems.   CDS licensing issues  HMRC has become aware of issues with licence data flows between the CDS and the DBT’s electronic licensing systems (also known as SPIRE/LITE). According to HMRC, these are temporary issues which happen if a CDS export declaration contains errors that impact the licence. If this occurs, the declaration cannot progress to cleared. HMRC has published guidance for declarants on how to deal with the issue and is currently working on a resolution with the DBT. An update will be provided in due course.  Miscellaneous updated guidance etc.   Recently updated guidance, and publications relevant to EU exit are set out below:  Authorised Consignee Temporary Storage (ACTS) location codes for Data Element 5/23 of the Customs Declaration Service  Known error workarounds for the Customs Declaration Service (CDS)  Claim repayment or remission of charges on rejected imports  How to claim a repayment of import duty and VAT if you've overpaid  Transit newsletters — HMRC updates  Internal temporary storage facilities (ITSFs) codes for Data Element 5/23 of the Customs Declaration Service  Data Element 2/3: Documents and Other Reference Codes (Union) of the Customs Declaration Service, and  Apply for release of a private vessel on payment of Customs Duty and VAT.   

The Institute has issued revised CPD Regulations with effect from 1 July 2024.  The minor changes to the CPD Regulations facilitate a planned simplification of the Institute's Individual Annual Return process for members. To access these regulations, please click on the link provided.

The Companies Registration Office have recently issued a guidance note in relation to The Do’s & Don’ts when filing B10 forms. The guidance note highlights some of the common issues that occur with filing B10 forms and assist presenters to avoid making mistakes when filing B10 forms. This is a very useful document and following the guidance should assist in ensuring that B10s are not rejected. Please note that the guide is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you have any further queries, please email the relevant CRO section at: companyofficers@cro.ie

On 19 June, continuing with the Legal Series with A&L Goodbody, the Ulster Society hosted a webinar on 'When contracts go wrong - remedies, termination and heads of loss'. James Flanagan, Partner in A&L Goodbody’s Litigation team presented on when contracts go wrong, including managing disputes, how to prepare for termination and what constitutes loss, such as indirect or consequential loss. When Contracts Go Wrong - June 2024 slidedeck

Sean Nolan and Joe Struble outline how the introduction of the new Corporate Transparency Act will impact Irish companies operating in the US Irish companies with business ties to the United States are now subject to new regulatory requirements under the US Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) 2021, which took effect on 1 January this year. This new legislation imposes stringent reporting obligations on both US and foreign companies, including those from Ireland, as part of a broader effort to combat financial crimes such as money laundering and terrorist financing. The legislation, while US-based, has significant implications for Irish businesses due to the global nature of modern commerce and close economic ties between Ireland and the US. The CTA also applies to individuals who own investment properties in the US through investment companies. What is required? The CTA mandates that all companies, including foreign entities registered to do business in the US, file a beneficial ownership information report with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's (FinCEN) new Beneficial Ownership Secure System (BOSS). This system is designed to increase transparency by disclosing the identities of the beneficial owners of companies, thereby reducing the potential for illicit activities facilitated through corporate anonymity. We are seeing a surge in requests for compliance assistance from Irish businesses uncertain about their obligations under the new US law. This emphasises the importance of compliance given the severe penalties for non-compliance, which include a daily default penalty of US$500 and potential imprisonment. Compliance burden The legislation reflects a strong commitment by law enforcement agencies in both Ireland and the US to tackle financial crime. It also introduces a significant compliance burden for legitimate businesses, however, which must now ensure they are fully prepared to meet these new requirements. For entities formed in 2024, the deadline to file their BOI reports is within 90 days of formation. Entities formed before 2024 have until 1 January 2025 to file. The required information includes detailed personal data about the beneficial owners, such as names, addresses, dates of birth and identifying numbers from documents like passport or driver’s licence. The BOSS database will be accessible to various US agencies, including those involved in national security, intelligence and law enforcement, as well as to state and local and enforcement agencies with court authorisation. This broad access aims to enhance the US government's capabilities in preventing, detecting and prosecuting international crime and terrorism. CTA filing requirements For Irish-owned companies operating in the US, analysing the CTA filing requirements and preparing an initial filing for a foreign-owned company can be complex. This is because of the limited availability of exemptions and the challenges in documenting beneficial ownership. The new Corporate Transparency Act aligns with several aspects of the European Union’s directives aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorist financing, which have been part of Irish law since 2016. The Act represents a significant shift towards greater corporate transparency and could set a precedent for future legislation in other jurisdictions, impacting global business operations. The implications of non-compliance could extend beyond financial penalties, potentially complicating future business dealings in the US due to criminal records against company owners or principal shareholders. Sean Nolan is a partner with Clark Hill in Dublin and Joe Struble is a corporate attorney with Clark Hill in San Antonio in the US

Thought leadership can be highly effective in professional services marketing, especially for accountancy firms. By showcasing expertise, firms can enhance their reputation and attract clients. Mary Cloonan explains how In today's competitive business-to-business landscape, thought leadership has emerged as a vital marketing strategy, especially for the accountancy profession. By establishing themselves as industry experts, firms can differentiate their services, build trust and attract high-value clients. Outlined below are seven steps you can take to enhance your firm’s marketing offering through the medium of thought leadership. Establish authority: thought leadership positions firms as knowledgeable leaders in their field. By consistently sharing insights, research and expert opinions, they demonstrate their expertise and reliability. Enhance brand visibility: regular publication of thought-provoking content can help firms stay top-of-mind among potential clients and industry peers. This increased visibility can lead to greater brand recognition and credibility. Build trust and relationships: clients are more likely to trust and engage with firms that provide valuable, insightful content. Thought leadership can foster long-term relationships by demonstrating a deep understanding of industry challenges and solutions. Drive business growth: thought leadership content can generate leads by attracting professionals seeking expert advice. It helps in converting prospects into clients by showcasing the firm's ability to solve complex problems. Validate and engage: content published by thought leaders acts as a validation point, which can reinforce your firm's expertise. This content can be shared on social media and forwarded to clients and prospects, further extending its reach and impact. Differentiation: in a crowded market, thought leadership sets firms apart. By sharing unique perspectives and innovative solutions, firms can differentiate themselves from competitors. Continuing Professional Development (CPD): Hosting, or offering to participate in, CPD events and workshops can help to educate clients on industry trends and also demonstrate the firm's expertise, fostering a culture of continuous learning and professional growth. How to implement thought leadership content To implement your thought leadership content, consider the following: Content creation: publish whitepapers, blogs and research reports regularly and bear in mind that this can be more effective if the research is industry-specific. Speaking engagements: participate in industry conferences and webinars. Social media: leverage platforms like LinkedIn to share insights and engage with your audience. Client education: host CPD events to educate clients on industry trends. The power of thought leadership For accountancy and advisory firms, thought leadership can be more than just a marketing tactic. It can offer a strategic approach to building authority, fostering trust and driving growth. By consistently demonstrating expertise and providing value, firms can create lasting client relationships and achieve sustainable success. Moreover, leveraging published content as validation on social media and for client communications amplifies its effectiveness with a view to building credibility with prospective clients. Mary Cloonan is the founder of Marketing Clever.

Organisational practices and culture often drive workplace conflicts. Ian Brinkley examines the impact of conflict and how it can be resolved and prevented in the future The modern workplace is often a place of harmonious or at least tolerable relationships, but sometimes things go wrong. Ranging from one-off tiffs to more serious and systematic incidents, conflict can occur even in the best run workplace. In early 2024, the Chartered Institute for Personnel Development (CIPD) conducted a large-scale workplace survey in the UK focused on the incidence, impact and resolution of conflict. What is conflict? According to the survey, conflict included feeling humiliated or undermined at work, being shouted at or in a heated argument, verbal abuse, unfair allegations, sexual and physical harassment, intimidation and assault and discrimination for a protected characteristic such as race, gender, disability or age. (The survey question did not mention religion.) About 25 percent of the UK workforce reported at least one form of conflict in the preceding 12 months. The most common conflicts involved being humiliated or undermined at work, being shouted at, followed by verbal abuse and discrimination linked to a protected characteristic. The most serious incidents, such as sexual and physical assault were thankfully rare. Most attention focuses on formal processes such as industrial tribunals, grievances and mediation as a means to resolve disputes. However, in practice, very few reported conflicts ever make it to this stage – just one percent ended up in employment tribunals, for example. The most common reactions are informal. About half of those who reported conflict reported that they let it go. Involving managers and HR was the second most common way of resolving conflict. Unresolved conflict About two-thirds of conflicts are either fully or partially resolved. However, one-third are not resolved at all. Unresolved conflicts may not be escalated because they are not serious enough, especially “one-offs”, or because people fear the repercussions if they do. The survey does not tell us directly which is more likely, though evidence on the impact of the conflict suggests the former is more common. Most people who reported conflict also said they had good working relations with managers and colleagues. However, they were more negative when it came to specific actions – for example, whether they were always treated fairly. We think this apparent contradiction is down to people making a distinction between working relations in general and specific incidents. Conflict also had relatively little impact on voluntary effort. Those who reported conflict were almost as likely to say they were willing to work harder than they needed to in order to help their organisation and just as likely to say they would help colleagues under pressure or make innovative suggestions. However, we do find a clear negative association between conflict and a range of other indicators of the quality of work. For example, those who report conflict are much more likely to say work had adversely affected their mental health and that they experienced excessive workloads and work pressures most or all of the time. We cannot tell from the survey whether the conflict was the cause of these negative impacts or whether workplaces, where work quality was already poor, are more likely to suffer conflict. Both are likely to be true. A decrease in workplace conflict The survey asked about conflict in 2019 and since then there has been a significant decrease from 30 to 25 percent of the workforce. There are, however, two important caveats. First, the improvement was largely confined to older white males in permanent, higher-skill white-collar jobs without disabilities. There was little or no improvement for the young; those in temporary or zero-hours jobs and short-hour contracts or those with disabilities, ethnic minorities and women. Non-heterosexual workers also saw less conflict over this period, but it still remains at a high level. In 2024, the latter groups reported significantly higher levels of conflict than the former, and since 2019 that gap has widened. Second, the fall in conflict has also been greatest for those groups that saw the biggest rise in home-working. Those who work at home are less likely to report conflicts such as being shouted at or subject to verbal abuse. Reducing workplace conflict No strategy to improve the quality of work can fully succeed unless the incidence of conflict is reduced, especially among the “left behind” groups. Improving the relative bargaining power of those who are more likely to report conflict may help. Legislative change focusing on formal dispute resolution may be justified but is unlikely to make much difference to the overall incidence of workplace conflict. The biggest impact is going to be from organisational practice. Improving work quality in workplaces with below-average work quality is an obvious priority, but even well-run organisations can suffer conflict. In both cases, mitigating some of the underlying causes of conflict, such as excessive workload combined with helping line managers manage conflict better in the future, will be required if progress is to be made over the next five years. Ian Brinkley is a labour market economist

The Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment has announced that the European Union (Adjustments of Size Criteria for Certain Companies and Groups) Regulations 2024 (S.I. No. 301 of 2024) were signed into law on the 19 June and come into operation on the 1 July 2024. The purpose of the Regulations is to adjust company size thresholds in line with 25 per cent inflation, thereby reducing the regulatory and administrative burden on some companies, which would otherwise become subject to audit and additional financial reporting requirements.  The Regulations, which transpose delegated Directive 2023/2775/EU, amend the Companies Act 2014 increasing company size thresholds as set out below. These size thresholds are contained in sections 280A to 280I of the Companies Act 2014, with company size being typically determined based on the company meeting two out of the three size criteria (with other relevant factors also applying). The increased size criteria are as follows; micro company –a balance sheet total of not greater than €450,000, a net turnover of not greater than €900,000 and no more than 10 average employees. small company – a balance sheet total of not greater than €7.5 million, a net turnover of not greater than €15 million and no more than 50 average employees. medium sized company – a balance sheet total of not greater than €25 million, a net turnover of not greater than €50 million and no more than 250 average employees. large company –continues to be defined as a company that does not qualify as micro, small or medium (ie. balance sheet total of greater than €25 million, net turnover of greater than €50 million and more than 250 average employees). Group size thresholds have also increased as set out below; small group- group balance sheet total of no greater than €7.5 million net (or €9 million gross), group turnover no greater than €15 million net (or €18 million gross) and no more than 50 average employees of the group. medium group- group balance sheet total of no greater than €25 million net (or €30 million gross), group turnover no greater than €50 million net (or €60 million gross) and no more than 250 average employees of the group. The measures apply for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2024, enabling companies to benefit from the adjusted thresholds immediately.  Companies may elect to apply the measures on or after 1 January 2023. Please see the DETE announcement. Chartered Accountants Ireland are delighted to see this regulation signed into law, giving clarity to companies on size thresholds, and their reporting requirements.      

Revenue has updated the Tax and Duty Manual which outlines procedures to make an application to pay Local Property Tax (LPT) by SEPA monthly direct debit. Paragraph 4 of the manual has been revised to include Andorra and the Vatican City in the list of countries in the SEPA area, and the screenshots to demonstrate online procedures in appendix 7 have been refreshed.

Revenue has updated the Stamp Duty Manual which provides guidance on the exemption from stamp duty on conveyances and transfers of property between associated companies. The exemption is provided under section 79 SDCA 1999 and is generally referred to as “associated companies relief”. The manual has been updated to clarify the treatment that may apply where the transferred property comprises shares in a company that is liquidated or dissolved within a two-year period following the transfer, resulting in the extinguishment of those shares (section 5.3.1).

Revenue has updated the Tax and Duty Manual regarding the confidentiality of taxpayer information. The updated guidance addresses the authorised disclosure of taxpayer information in the context of Joint Audits carried out by Revenue officials in conjunction with nominated officials from other EU Member States(paragraph 4.13). Section 891L TCA 1997, introduced by Finance (No. 2) Act 2023, implemented article 12a of DAC7. A joint audit is an administrative inquiry conducted by Revenue and the competent authority of another Member State when linked to a person of common or complimentary interest in both jurisdictions. At a recent meeting of the TALC Audit Sub-Committee, Revenue confirmed that the joint audit process is outside the scope of the Compliance Intervention Framework.

Revenue has updated the following guidance to reflect increases in the 2024 tax rate bands and tax credits in Finance (No.2) Act 2023: High Income Individuals' Restriction regarding income chargeable to tax at the standard rate in joint assessment cases; PAYE reviews where Week 53 applies; and Guidance on the income tax treatment of married persons and civil partners.

Revenue has updated the Tax and Duty Manual which provides guidance on tax relief for charitable donations to approved bodies. The amendments include: Examples of payments to "approved bodies" which are not considered a relevant donation for the purposes of the Charitable Donation Scheme (paragraph 3); Educational institutions defined in section 53(1)(a) of the Higher Education Authority Act 2022 and the Royal Irish Academy are added to the list of approved bodies (paragraph 6); and The increase to €250,000 in the minimum annual income limit for audited financial accounts (paragraph 8).

Revenue’s Economic Research Unit is running a survey of medium sized tax agents to further inform its understanding of the issues facing tax agents in order to improve the quality of the service it provides. Agents selected for the survey will receive an email inviting them to complete the online survey before Monday 8 July 2024. Revenue has confirmed that it will not ask for financial or personal information in this, or in any other survey, or email. The survey is not in any way connected with an agent’s individual tax affairs. Further information is available in Revenue’s press release.

The Institute, under the auspices of the CCAB-I, made representations on behalf of members at last week’s meeting of the TALC Collections Sub-Committee. At the meeting, Revenue provided an update on the Debt Warehousing Scheme and the local property tax (LPT) and vacant home tax (VHT) compliance projects which it has commenced. Revenue confirmed that it is preparing updated guidance on 2023 income tax filing requirements for non-resident landlords and it has updated its system to allow agents to pay Relevant Tax on Share Options for pre-2024 liabilities. Debt Warehousing Scheme Revenue confirmed that if taxpayers have phased payment arrangements (PPAs) for both warehoused debt at 0 percent interest and other debt at the standard rate, PPA payments are automatically allocated against the oldest debt. Taxpayers cannot elect to allocate payments against debt with a higher interest rate if this did not precede the warehoused debt. However, it may be possible to reduce the interest charge if the taxpayer makes a payment outside the PPA towards current taxes.   Revenue explained that PPA compliance monitoring is fully automated once commenced. If there is a failed payment, the taxpayer is notified that Revenue will retry in 21 days. If there is a further failure, the taxpayer will lose the 0 percent interest rate and standard enforcement will commence.   Local Property Tax Revenue noted that some taxpayers who pay their LPT by deduction at source from pay or pension have failed to file an LPT return. Revenue advises that they file an LPT return as soon as possible in order to avoid issues at a later date. Revenue will write to this cohort of taxpayers in September to remind them to file the outstanding return; agents will not be copied. Vacant Homes Tax Revenue intends writing to persons that own 2 to 19 properties, asking them to declare whether the property is occupied or is vacant. Where vacant, and not already returned, a return and payment will be required to regularise their affairs. In September Revenue will issue 2024 reminder letters to those that previously declared a VHT liability. Non-resident Landlords A consequence of the commencement of the non-resident landlord withholding tax (NLWT) portal on 1 July 2023 is the requirement, in some cases, for two income tax returns for 2023. This arises in instances where a collecting agent was responsible for the non-resident landlord’s rental affairs for the period to 30 June 2023 then opted to utilise the NLWT portal from 1 July 2023 onwards. Revenue is preparing guidance to outline how a single return can be filed in such circumstances for 2023. Single filing will require the chargeable person (responsible for period 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023) to cease registration and the non-resident landlord will file all rental details for the 2023 year. Letters will issue in the coming weeks to chargeable persons. If they want to retain registration, they must contact Revenue to do so. Revenue has confirmed that non-resident landlords should not include details of Irish rental income that is being returned by a chargeable person. Payment of RTSO As readers will be aware, from 1 January 2024, the taxation of a gain realised on the exercise, assignment, or release of share options no longer falls under individual self-assessment. Instead, employers are responsible for collecting income tax, USC, and PRSI from employees on share option gains and for remitting those taxes to Revenue as part of the payroll process. Revenue has updated its website for these changes and additional text has been added to screens to alert anyone trying to submit RTSO for 2024. The self-assessment regime continues to apply to gains arising on or before 31 December 2023, as does the obligation to register for RTSO. Revenue has confirmed that is has updated its system to allow an agent to make an RTSO payment for pre 1 January 2024 liabilities.

At the most recent meeting of the TALC Direct & Capital Taxes Sub-committee, Revenue announced that it is finally updating its practice surrounding the review of its Tax and Duty Manuals (TDMs), including a commitment to make historic TDMs available on its website. The plan over the summer months is to commence a two-stage process to enhance the availability of Revenue guidance in future. Stage one will see up to four previous versions of a manual made available on Revenue’s website. The TDM will bear a watermark conveying that the particular manual is “out of date” and so may not be relied upon. Revenue has committed to refreshing its website so that the four most recent previous versions of guidance are available (excluding the current version). Stage two will see a change to the annual TDM review process whereby the manual under review will remain available during the review process. The manual will bear a watermark conveying that the guidance is “out of date/under review” and so may not be relied upon. The Institute, under the auspices of the CCAB-I, raised this issue in April 2022 via the TALC Direct & Capital Taxes Sub-committee (see Item 3). In October of that year, a delegation of stakeholders met with Revenue to progress the matter further (see Item 3(c)). Although it has taken time to implement the recommendations arising from this earlier engagement, this change in practice will make a significant difference to practitioners and taxpayers in future. As such, we are grateful for the continued engagement of both Revenue and those representing CCAB-I through the TALC process as a key forum to raise pressure points arising on both sides of the tax administration divide.