Following public consultation last year, IAASA has published a revised Ethical Standard for Auditors (Ireland). As part of the revisions to the standard, IAASA has also updated its Glossary of Terms. IAASA has also published a feedback paper which summarises its response to the main points raised by the consultation respondents. The effective date of the revised standard is for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026. Early adoption is permitted. The feedback paper is available here. The responses received are available here. The revised standard is available here. The revised Glossary of Terms is available here.    

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has released its revised International Standard on Auditing 570 (Revised 2024), Going Concern. The revised standard responds to corporate failures that raised questions regarding auditors’ responsibilities by significantly enhancing the auditor’s work in evaluating management’s assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The revise standard is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 15 December, 2026. ISA 570 (Revised 2024) introduces several key changes: Robust risk assessment. Auditors must conduct, in a more timely manner, thorough risk assessments to determine whether events or conditions are identified that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Evaluating Management’s Assessment. Auditors must evaluate management’s assessment of going concern irrespective of whether events or conditions are identified. In doing so, auditors must consider the potential for management bias and evaluate the underlying method, significant assumptions, and data used when management formed its assessment. Additionally, auditors must evaluate whether management’s judgements and decisions indicate potential bias. Extended date of evaluation period. The auditor’s evaluation period for going concern now extends at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements, contributing to an assessment of more relevant, decision-useful information. Enhanced transparency. The standard requires clearer communication in the auditor’s report about the auditor’s responsibilities and work related to going concern and strengthened communications with those charged with governance and external parties. The IAASB also developed a fact sheet and Basis for Conclusions, which are available on the IAASB’s website. The IAASB will also issue a frequently asked questions document and technical overview video to support the revised standard’s implementation.

The Institute has today published a webpage on Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 - Changes in Companies House.  The aim of this webpage is to inform members of the recent Companies House identity verification changes and how to register as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider. These identity verification requirements came into effect on a voluntary basis on 8 April 2025 and will be mandatory for all company directors and People with Significant Control from Autumn 2025.  It also sets out other changes to be introduced by Companies House at a later date and reminds members of the changes from phase 1 last year.   

In a unsettled world in which global temperatures continue to rise, accounting for sustainability has never been more important, writes Susan Rossney  On 26 February 2025, the European Commission proposed changes to the laws governing, among other things, sustainability reporting.  Regardless of any changes to sustainability reporting legislation, there will be little let-up in the momentum of the sustainability policy developments impacting those accountants working to embed sustainability in company strategies and operations. Accountants and sustainability  ‘Sustainability’ is a broad term, defined in 1987 by the United Nations (UN) as: “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.  Financial professionals often describe it as ‘ESG’—i.e. measuring an organisation against specific environmental, social and governance metrics.  The need to gather the data required to measure business performance, and allow investors to compare businesses, is one of the many reasons sustainability has become increasingly important for accountants.  Even before the introduction of legislation compelling disclosure of sustainability information, however, many businesses had been working hard to integrate sustainability into their operations. This is partly because it makes good business sense—reduced energy costs being just one of them—but also because businesses are run by and for people who appreciate that businesses depend on a functioning society. And society, in turn, needs functioning ecosystems—energy, raw materials and a healthy workforce with access to clean air, clean water, food and security.  The risk of the ‘wicked problem’  Climate change and biodiversity collapse are archetypal ‘wicked problems’, a term coined in the 1970s by design theorists Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber. Wicked problems describe planning and social policy problems that seem difficult or impossible to solve. They resist resolution. Like Whac-A-Moles, you hit one part of a wicked problem on the head and another one pops up to surprise you.  Solving wicked problems requires thousands of stakeholders to do “everything, everywhere, all at once,” as UN Secretary-General António Guterres has put it.  With all indicators pointing to a relentless rise in global temperatures, both mitigation (reducing harmful emissions) and adaptation (adapting to the effects of climate change—wildfires, floods, droughts, migration, costs etc) have never been more necessary for businesses to mitigate risks.  Systemic risks Systemic risks are the widespread and interconnected threats posed by the climate and biodiversity crises to the stability of financial systems and the global economy.  These risks include the world reaching so-called ‘tipping points’—levels of global warming and rising sea levels from which there is no return, for example.   A report commissioned by the European Central Bank in 2022 found that climate risk could substantially amplify losses in an interconnected financial system of banks, investment funds and insurers.  In a report published in December 2024, the European Central Bank and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority warned that climate change is increasing the frequency of natural disasters, resulting in multibillion euro costs left uncovered by insurance.  In January 2025, global reinsurer Aon disclosed that economic losses resulting from natural disasters in 2024 totalled $368 billion, marking 2024 as the ninth consecutive year of losses exceeding $300 billion.   Physical risks The physical risks to businesses can be both acute and chronic.  An example of an acute physical risk is a wildfire, such as the Los Angeles wildfires that took place in the US in January, which are likely to be one of the costliest natural disasters in US history.  A chronic risk could be a drought, such as those that cause water shortages in regions in which semiconductors are manufactured—a core component of enabling technologies critical to economic growth, national security and global competitiveness.  Along with the loss of life and suffering of those caught up in these physical events and their immediate and long-term aftermath, there are also risks to business. These include damaged assets, raw materials shortages, environmental degradation (such as those affecting tourism industries), resource scarcity, supply chain disruptions and business interruption.  Transition risks In the context of business and climate change, transition risks are the financial and operational uncertainties businesses face in the shift towards a low-carbon economy.  These transition risks include fluctuating costs and secure energy supply as the economy and societies transition to net zero. They also include increased operating costs for waste management and insurance and exposure to carbon tax liability, which is expected to rise to €100 per tonne of CO2 emitted in Ireland by 2030.  Recent reports from the World Economic Forum warn that climate inaction could cost businesses up to seven percent of annual earnings by 2035. Other risks include reputational risk and a threat to a company’s ‘social licence to operate,’ as well as legal challenges.  In 2024, London’s Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment reported that there are 2,666 ongoing climate litigation cases globally, noting a rise in the number of climate cases filed against companies. Another transition risk for businesses is their potential inability to secure lower-cost funding, as lenders and investors increasingly seek information on sustainability-related risks.  Equally, a company’s existing products or services could become obsolete in the transition, while competitors may gain an advantage by adopting new technologies and attracting or retaining valuable talent as more and more candidates vet companies’ ESG credentials before deciding to join or remain with a business.  This shift in preference towards more sustainably run companies extends to an organisation’s ability to tender for contracts, particularly in the public sector with the rise of green public procurement practices. In Ireland, for example, the Government published Buying Greener: Green Public Procurement Strategy and Action Plan 2024-2027 in April 2024 with the aim of driving green and circular procurement practices across the public sector. With annual public sector purchasing accounting for 10 to 12 percent of Ireland’s gross domestic product, this plan will likely influence a significant portion of economic activity and demand.  Regulations and policies Businesses must carefully consider sustainability-related regulations and policies that affect every level of the economy, from international to local. At the international level, treaties such as the Paris Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework join supranational policy initiatives, such as the EU Green Deal and EU Biodiversity Strategy, to ensure specific climate action and biodiversity protection commitments cascade to the national policy level.  Sustainability is one of the core pillars of Northern Ireland’s 10X Strategy where the Climate Change Act (Northern Ireland) 2022 requires at least 80 percent of electricity consumption in the region to be from renewable sources by 2030.  The Northern Ireland Executive’s Programme for Government 2024-2027, Our Plan: Doing What Matters Most, prioritises the development of a globally competitive and sustainable economy while also focusing on protecting the environment.  The UK government recently published its National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan in which it commits to achieving all 23 targets of the Global Biodiversity Framework at home. More recently, the UK government published the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs’ Corporate Plan for 2025-2027 which sets a strategic direction for its path towards a transition to a net-zero, nature-positive future. Ireland has implemented similar policies to achieve its climate and biodiversity targets through successive Climate Action Plans and sectoral targets for emissions. Additionally, under the fourth National Biodiversity Action Plan, a key objective is to engage 900 businesses in the Business for Biodiversity Ireland initiative by the end of 2025.  Other measures will prevent companies from making misleading claims about the environmental merits of their products and services, while also helping Ireland to transition to a circular economy.  Achieving the legally binding climate targets established under the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2021, which aims to ensure Ireland meets its national emissions reduction targets, is critical from both a financial and a climate perspective.  In December 2024, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) warned that the climate transition poses Ireland’s second largest budgetary challenge, second only to our ageing population.  In a 2025 joint report with the Climate Change Advisory Council, IFAC estimated that failure to meet our climate targets would incur penalties of up to €8 billion for Ireland and €26 billion for Europe. Alongside these policy developments, businesses will be required to gather more climate, nature and biodiversity information this year and beyond — and accountants in  the public and private sectors will play a critical role in managing it.  In a shock-prone world where all indicators point to a relentless rise in global temperatures, accounting for sustainability has never been more crucial.  Chartered Accountants Ireland’s Sustainability Centre offers guidance and resources for businesses. Additionally, members can subscribe to the Institute’s fortnightly Technical Round Up and weekly Sustainability/ESG Bulletins, both included in the weekly Chartered Accountants Ireland newsletter, and on LinkedIn.    Susan Rossney is Sustainability Advocacy Manager at Chartered Accountants Ireland

As the founder of Bleeper, the Dublin-based bike sharing venture, Hugh Cooney, FCA, is playing a crucial role in supporting and promoting sustainable travel in the nation’s capital A 2016 trip to China prompted a career change for Chartered Accountant Hugh Cooney who would go on to launch Bleeper, his Dublin-based dockless bike rental start-up, the following year. “It was when I was in China that I saw the world’s first standalone bike-sharing scheme,” Cooney explains.  “Up until then, it was all bikes at fixed locations. These standalone bikes each had smart locks which were opened by an app. I really liked the concept, and I spent the next four months or so looking at how to bring it to Ireland.” Path to accountancy His foray into sustainable entrepreneurship wasn’t Cooney’s first career shift. Prior to his 2016 trip to China, he had already lived in Shanghai for five years, working for property developer Treasury Holdings, before returning home to train as a Chartered Accountant. “I moved back to Ireland in 2010. The jobs market was tough at the time due to the global financial crisis. I didn’t want to stick with the property business and decided to add a qualification to my CV. I had always been interested in accountancy and had studied it at college,” he says. “I saw that Chartered Accountants Ireland had launched its Elevation Programme in 2009 to enable people to become Chartered Accountants without a training contract.  “I thought it would be perfect for me and signed up for it in 2010. I got a job in PwC’s corporate finance division, did my Final Accounting Exams in 2013 and became a qualified Chartered Accountant.” A subsequent role with KPMG saw Cooney working on aspects of the Irish Banking Resolution Corporation (IBRC) administration.  “I joined KPMG in 2014 and worked on the sale of IBRC non-performing loans in their transaction services division. We had to get the loan book into a condition where buyers were happy with the information provided,” he says. Then came that lightbulb moment in China and the launch of Cooney’s Bleeper business: “I left KPMG in April 2017 and Bleeper opened for business soon after,” he says. The birth of Bleeper The name for Bleeper came to Cooney one day as he was walking past the Luas stop on Dublin’s Harcourt Street.  “I heard the ‘ding ding’ sound of the Luas. The bikes make a bleep sound when they are unlocked, so I decided to call it Bleeper.” Start-up finance came from a mix of sources. “At the start, I had a joint venture with a Chinese company. They contributed the bikes and I raised money from friends and family as well. We started with a thousand bikes and the Chinese company also made the software we used.” Having the bikes, software and finance in place was just the beginning, however. It’s not possible to simply start a bike-sharing business in a city like Dublin without some form of permit or licence.  For Cooney, this ultimately came down to the introduction of a set of bylaws by Dublin City Council.  “Dublin city centre is so complex and there is such competition for road space, Dublin City Council needed to put some rules around it,” he explains, paying tribute to the speed with which council officials and elected members of the Strategic Policy Committee approved the bylaws.  “It usually takes a few years, but they started working on the bylaws in June 2017 and they were approved the following December.” The council then ran a competition for two licences, one of which was awarded to Bleeper. “We were allowed to put our first bike in the Dublin City Council administrative area in June 2018,” Cooney says. Regular Bleeper users can buy a pass, while less frequent users can pay as they go. The pay-as-you-go rate is €1 to unlock the bike and four cent per minute thereafter.  “Our average trip is 17 minutes, and most people pay us €1.68. Under the bylaws, the bikes have to be locked to a public bike rack,” Cooney explains. “We are fined if they’re not locked to the racks, and we pass that on to the customer concerned. There is a chain on the bike which they use to lock it to the rack. Compliance is very good—less than one percent of users don’t follow the rules.” Since its launch, Bleeper has grown to include electric bike leasing and sales divisions. “People can lease a bike just like a car,” Cooney says.  “They pay by the week and can give it back at a week’s notice. We found that some customers want to buy an electric bike, but they are not cheap. The entry level is €2,000 and they can go right up to €5,000.  “We opened a shop on Lower Bridge Street and people can come in and take a bike for a test ride before they buy. Business is good and we’ve been profitable for the last couple of years. We are growing revenue every year and hope to continue on that path.” Mobility Partnership Ireland Bleeper was one of the founding members of Mobility Partnership Ireland (MPI)—a coalition of shared transport providers launched four years ago—and Cooney was recently elected as MPI Chair for the year ahead.  “MPI started with three member firms, including ourselves, Moby and Yuko. We had realised that all commercial operators in the sustainable transport space were meeting the same State officials. It was time-consuming and inefficient. We decided to come together as a collective for lobbying purposes and to promote sustainable transport generally,” Cooney says. Definitions of sustainable transport can vary. “For me, it is anything that is not a single passenger car journey. A car with four people in it isn’t unsustainable. Anything that is not a single occupancy car journey can be sustainable. “If you read the Climate Action Plan, the goal is to enable 500,000 daily sustainable travel journeys by 2030. It’s not realistic to ask people to give up their cars. People have lots of reasons to hold onto their cars.  “But, if it’s a sunny day, we can get them to ask themselves if they need to drive to work that day. It’s not about whether people have a car or an electric vehicle. It’s about the amount of time they use it.” Promoting sustainable transport Cooney believes more should be done to promote the sustainable travel targets set out in the Climate Action Plan. “I don’t see the Government advertising their Climate Action Plan target for sustainable journeys. They need to get out there and break the target down into smaller steps,” he says. Commercially operated sustainable transport services should be supported as part of the this, Cooney adds.  “A lot of people think public transport is publicly owned and funded but there are lots of alternative commercial providers,” he says.  “It needs a bit of a shift in mindset. All of the incentives and subsidies tend to go to publicly owned services, but more consideration needs to be given to commercially operated sustainable transport services.” Since its launch four years ago, MPI has grown to eight member firms, including Aircoach and FreeNow.  “Our plan is to work closely with the Minister for Transport and the National Transport Authority as one group. We want to break down the ‘us and them’ mentality that currently exists,” Cooney says. “We can easily get to the 500,000 trips target in sustainable transport if we all work together, and I believe we can get way more than that if commercially operated sustainable transport services are supported. “We want to work with the government to get more people out of the default habit of jumping in the car for every trip.” It isn’t always easy to get these ideas across to Government, however. “The process of making pre-budget submissions is very costly and time-consuming for businesses,” Cooney points out.  “You don’t get written answers or clarity on why proposals have not been accepted. There should be a downloadable template on the Department of Finance website. That would make it easier for businesses to make submissions and easier for the department to run the process.  “It’s not unreasonable to ask that they make it easier and to give people feedback on their submissions. We have put forward ways of encouraging people to use alternatives to their cars but haven’t got any response.” On a more positive note, Cooney sees lots of potential for Bleeper to grow.  “Less than six percent of people in Dublin commute to work on a bike. In Amsterdam and Copenhagen, it’s closer to 50 percent. The government target for Ireland is 15 percent. Our goal is to play a big role in reaching that target,” he says. Interview by Barry McCall

Dee Moran, FCA, explores the potential impact of the European Commission’s much-anticipated Omnibus package on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive  26 February 2025 felt like doomsday for many immersed in sustainability. After weeks of rumours, the European Commission published its first Omnibus package of simplification measures for sustainability reporting and regulation. If approved, these measures will substantially water down the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and EU taxonomy for sustainable activities.   In publishing the proposals, the European Commission noted that they would enable businesses “to grow and create quality jobs, attract investments, get the necessary funds for their transition towards a more sustainable economy and help the EU meet the Green Deal’s ambitious objectives”. Many in the profession were dismayed by the introduction of the new CSRD simplification proposals, however, particularly those that had just published their 2024 annual reports with the required environmental, social and governance (ESG) information included for the first time.  Their companies have invested heavily in sustainability reporting and, depending on their size, could now potentially fall out of scope of the CSRD under the new proposals.   Their less prepared counterparts, meanwhile, will have felt some relief that their own tardiness in starting their sustainability journey and preparing for CSRD reporting has been rewarded. So, where does the Omnibus package leave the future of CSRD reporting? Some of the proposed amendments are outlined here, with a short analysis for each. Timeline: two-year delay The Omnibus measures propose delaying the deadline for CSRD reporting by two years—to 2027 for wave two companies, and 2028 for wave three. The two-year ‘stop the clock’ proposal has generally been welcomed as it would give companies more time to prepare for CSRD reporting.  There are concerns among some, however, that the two-year delay is too long, with some maintaining that a 12-month lag would have been more effective in maintaining momentum. Budgets are already approved for next year, but securing the budget for a second year might be more challenging.   Overall, however, the proposed delay is being viewed as a welcome means to provide a much-needed breather for companies.  Threshold: employee numbers The European Commission’s Omnibus package proposes raising the threshold for numbers employed by companies in scope of the CSRD from 250 to 1,000 (and either a turnover greater than €50 million or balance sheet total exceeding €25 million). This proposal would reduce the number of companies in scope of the CSRD across Europe by about 80 percent—from 50,000 companies down to about 7,000.  The 7,000 figure is also substantially lower than the 11,000 companies obliged to report under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive.  The higher employee threshold proposal has met with varying reactions in the profession, with many expressing that 1,000 goes too far, and that 500 employees and above would be more proportionate. This will no doubt be debated at length in the months ahead.  It is worth pointing out, however, that companies that would not fall in-scope of the CSRD under the new proposed threshold may still opt to voluntarily adopt the proposed standard. Voluntary SME standard The Commission has proposed that it will adopt, by way of a delegated act, a voluntary sustainability reporting standard (VSME) to facilitate reporting of sustainability information by companies that are not in-scope for the CSRD.  This will be based on the revised voluntary sustainability reporting standard for non-listed micro, small and medium enterprises (VSME) submitted by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) to the European Commission in December 2024. Value chain cap The Omnibus measures propose the introduction of a ‘value chain cap’. This move would serve to limit the information CSRD reporters can request from non-CSRD reporters in their value chain with fewer than 1,000 employees. They would not be permitted to request any information exceeding that specified in the revised VSME. While this proposal could potentially diminish the comprehensiveness of sustainability reports, it would also reduce the sustainability reporting burden on smaller companies and—provided that the revised VSME standard is comprehensive—should still provide companies in-scope of the CSRD with the value chain information they need. Reasonable assurance standards The requirement to have assurance on a sustainability report is a fundamental part of the CSRD, with limited assurance in the first instance and the potential to move to reasonable assurance following a review.  The Omnibus package seeks to remove the requirement for reasonable assurance as a means to streamline the reporting process, while also maintaining some oversight.  This proposal has been largely welcomed as it would reduce the cost of compliance for CSRD reporters and would also be less burdensome.  Some stakeholders have, however, voiced concerns that removing the need for reasonable assurance over the longer term may compromise the trustworthiness and reliability of data.  Investors, in particular, have been vocal about their need for accurate data to reduce the risk of greenwashing. Reasonable assurance would provide an additional level of comfort. European Sustainability Reporting Standards The Omnibus package commits to simplifying the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), including a reduction in the number of data points, clarification of provisions deemed unclear and an improvement in consistency with other pieces of legislation. With in excess of 1,100 data points, the volume and complexity of the ESRS has raised many concerns, and Chartered Accountants Ireland was critical of the high number of ESRS data points in our response to the initial public consultation on the draft ESRS.  The Omnibus proposes to simplify the ESRS by reducing the number of data points and focusing on qualitative over quantitative information.  The Commission has asked EFRAG to commence the work of simplifying the ESRS and to provide their technical advice by 31 October 2025. It is important, however, that sufficient time is allowed for proper consultation with stakeholders. Sector-specific standards The Omnibus proposal reverses the existing plan for sector-specific standards to be developed and adopted by the European Commission, a move that would have increased the number of data points required for CSRD reporting.  Again, there are varying views on this proposal in the profession. Some maintain that sector-specific standards would lead to more relevant and meaningful disclosures in specific industries while also providing for more effective comparability.  Others cite increased cost and complexity as a potential negative, particularly for companies operating across multiple sectors.  Double materiality assessment The Omnibus proposal does not change the CSRD’s double materiality perspective, meaning that companies remaining in scope will have to report on how sustainability risks affect their business and their own impact on people and the environment. The retention of the double materiality assessment (DMA) is not surprising given that it is a key requirement under the CSRD.  While cost and the availability of data have been cited by some as barriers to completing the DMA, the recommended reduction in ESRS data points and proposed two-year reporting delay should assist reporters in meeting this requirement.      What happens next? It is important to remember that these Omnibus simplification measures are just proposals. The next step will see these proposals reviewed by both the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.  A staggered approach to the proposed amendments would see the ‘stop the clock’ proposals be approved in the first instance to give companies clarity on their reporting requirements for 2025.  The European Council and the European Parliament have already approved this amendment.  The proposal now needs to be approved formally by the Council and signed by the Presidents of both Institutions. It will then be published in the Official Journal, which is expected by the end of June. Member States have until 31 December 2025 to transpose into their national laws. We have been advocating for speedy transposition of the Directive to the Department of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment , which has committed to prioritising this.  Once the ‘stop the clock’ proposal has been approved, this will allow time for the other proposals to be debated, and for EFRAG to develop and present to the European Commission a revised set of ESRS and a new set of voluntary standards based on the VSME.  The revised ESRS are expected to be adopted as soon as is practicable, but no later than six months after the entry into force of a revised CSRD.  Our professional accounting team at Chartered Accountants Ireland will continue to review these proposals, engage with members, other professional bodies and relevant stakeholders, and respond to European Commission and EFRAG consultations on your behalf. Our priority, as always, will be to represent our members in lending our voice to continued progress in the sustainability agenda that is also proportionate and cost-effective for companies.  While the initial reaction to the Omnibus package of proposals was mixed, it has been encouraging to hear from many in the profession that a reduced scope would allow them to better focus on material matters and on gathering quality data, while the delayed timeline would also give them greater scope to prepare thoroughly for CSRD reporting.  Dee Moran, FCA, is Professional Accountancy Lead at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Martina Goss, FCA, continues to broaden her skill set to support sustainable entrepreneurship and ESG progress in Ireland and beyond Martina Goss, FCA, is leveraging her financial knowledge and expertise in business strategy and lean methodologies to help start-ups and SMEs succeed, innovate and build sustainable strategies aligned with Ireland’s climate goals. Here, she tells Accountancy Ireland about the career path that has seen her pivot from finance to supporting Ireland’s entrepreneurial community and more besides.  Q. What first sparked your interest in sustainability and the whole area of environmental, social and governance?  I have always had a love of nature. I grew up in rural Ireland and, today, I live in the countryside in Co. Louth surrounded by mountains, nature and wildlife.  A few years ago, I pivoted my career away from pure finance to what I do now, offering training and business coaching to start-ups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). That shift brought me into contact with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and the entrepreneurs doing amazing things on the ground to progress these goals. I look at environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles in a holistic way. I’m not just interested in nature and climate change, but also in the human aspect—the ‘S’ in ‘ESG’ and, in particular, the focus of the fourth UN SDG on ensuring inclusive, equitable and quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all. To this end, I began working in 2023 as a facilitator with Global Youth Forum, a non-profit in Kenya that offers life-skills coaching, mentoring and sports programmes to young people with the aim of equipping them with the skills to improve their lives by securing a job or starting a business. Q. Tell us about that career pivot: what prompted it?  I started my career in practice before transitioning into industry where I held financial roles in many different organisations.  Then, in 2015, I did Chartered Accountants Ireland’s first ever Diploma in Strategic Finance and Business Analytics. That was the turning point for me.  By complete chance, while I was looking for a project for the course, I met an entrepreneur who was taking part in New Frontiers, Enterprise Ireland’s national entrepreneur development programme. He had a sustainable business idea for flood defence and wanted support from someone with a business background. I needed an idea for my diploma, so we did this match transaction.  At that stage, I knew I wanted to move beyond focusing solely on the numbers of a business. Fast forward a few years and I became the programme manager of New Frontiers at both Dundalk Institute of Technology and Invent, DCU’s commercialisation and technology transfer unit. Whilst managing that programme, I was introduced, not just to the world of start-ups and innovation but also entrepreneurs building sustainable businesses in alignment with the UN’s SDGs. Later, I reskilled as a Lean Start Up Coach, training with Ash Maurya, the founder of Leanstack in the US. He is the author and creator of the Lean Canvas, a business modelling tool used by businesses worldwide. Q. Can you describe the work you do today and the services you offer?  I work predominantly with start-ups and SMEs, helping them with their business strategy, reimagining their business models and innovating in a sustainable manner, so they can successfully launch or reinvent products and services. My work combines my expertise as a Chartered Accountant and Lean Start-up Coach and increasingly incorporates ESG. Last year, I completed my second course with Chartered Accountants Ireland, this time a certificate in sustainability strategy, risk and reporting. Innovation is a big focus for many of my clients. They understand the world is rapidly changing and they know they need to reassess their business model, but they may feel a little stuck or challenged as to where to start.  They may have new products or services they want to launch, or they might want to adapt what they are already doing to changing customer needs and market trends.  At the forefront of my work is the idea that you must always listen to the market—to what your customers want and the problem you solve for them.   We do a deep dive into their business model. We look at why the company exists—what problem does it solve for customers? What is its vision? What are its goals and strategy to compete?  We look at trends in the marketplace, we talk to the company’s customers and stakeholders. We use that information, both qualitative and quantitative, to reimagine the company’s business model and its products and services. The aim is to create a business model that is financially viable, desirable for its customers and sustainable for the planet.  Q. Where does ESG come into the work you do with these companies?  It comes back to that critical piece in any business strategy—listening to the market trends and responding to customer needs. Developing new products and services is the perfect opportunity to blend sustainability and innovation together into one. More people today are thinking about sustainable products and sustainable business practices because they are concerned about the climate crisis and the need to decarbonise our economies. This is a market trend, so, by embedding sustainable practices into their strategy and operations, start-ups and SMEs can help to ensure long term viability. There is a cost involved at the outset, but it is worth mentioning that, by incorporating Lean practices into their business model, businesses can eliminate costly waste. There is often so much waste in organisations. Lean start-up principles, when applied to new product development, can have a considerable ESG impact on a business because they fundamentally seek to minimise waste.  Q. What would you like to see happen now to support the advancement of ESG in Ireland and beyond?  From my perspective working with businesses, I think what is required to galvanise the ESG movement is a change in mindset. Businesses are run by people, so the shift in mindset is down to the individual—to each and every one of us.  This starts with small changes in our personal lives where we can embrace a more minimalist way of living, consume less and cut down on the excess in our lives. We buy too much. We have too much waste.  The Sustainable Progress Index 2025, published in February by Social Justice Ireland, ranked Ireland ninth out of 14 comparable EU countries overall, but placed us in the bottom five for nine SDGs, including responsible consumption and production (SDG 12). According to Social Justice Ireland, we continue to generate a significant amount of municipal waste per capita, while the recycling rate of our municipal waste and circular material use is low. So, I think we all need to think about our own consumption, and about what we can do to cut down on the waste we generate.  I believe that, if each one of us was just one percent better, the collective impact would be massive. These changes at an individual level can then feed into new businesses and start-ups launched by people with ESG principles at their core, in terms of what they are bringing to market or how their businesses operate with sustainability, minimal waste and other societal benefits at their core.  Critically, as Chartered Accountants, we have quite a vast skill set we can apply to helping businesses delivering ESG benefits. For younger generations, ESG is already instilled in their mindset. They care about the future of the planet, about climate change and a fair and just society.  Businesses today can’t afford to overlook this fundamental shift in what people and the market wants.  Real change comes when you believe in it and work towards it. 

Kate van der Merwe, FCA, has carved out an impressive career in sustainability driven by her passion to effect positive societal and climate change  An abiding sense of adventure and curiosity has guided Kate van der Merwe’s career from accounting to sustainability, and from the corporate realm to the world of nonprofits, as she continues to pursue her passion to effect positive societal and climate change. Originally from KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa’s east coast, van der Merwe studied social science at the University of Cape Town before qualifying in Ireland as a Chartered Accountant and forging a successful career as a sustainability consultant. Driven to explore “I think it’s my background in social science that has made me so curious and driven to explore,” van der Merwe says. “The social sciences have a good dose of curiosity and exploration, but in the early stages of my career, I found myself struggling a bit to find roles in the messy ‘real world’.  “I lived in the UK on a working visa for two years after college and, being a South African, my mobility was restricted. I decided to go into Chartered Accountancy to open doors and cross borders. “At the time, I told my humanities-driven self that finance was the linchpin of economic systems, and it might one day allow me to effect some positive societal change.”  Van der Merwe relocated to Ireland in 2006 to train as a Chartered Accountant with a firm in Dublin. Her qualification in 2009 coincided with the onslaught of the global financial crisis, however, prompting her to return to Southern Africa, where she spent five months travelling around the region. “It really was a case of ‘when life gives you lemons’, because that trip was pivotal for me,” she says.  “It brought me back to my childhood surrounded by so much biodiversity. I was fortunate growing up that, during the holidays, we were able to go to the beach, to the mountains and, every now and again, to the bush.”  “Years later, my childhood experience would also become the driving force behind my interest in the social aspect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles. “The apartheid system was still in place when I was at primary school and then Nelson Mandela was released, and we had our first democratic elections in 1994. Those experiences instilled in me an awareness of the importance of social justice and equality.”  Early career Van der Merwe returned to Ireland in 2011 to take up finance roles, first in the pharmaceutical industry and then in the technology sector. “I joined Google and I was immersed in this environment in which values, such as sustainability, were on the agenda. Google was doing interesting work in renewable energy innovation at the time. “Then I received my naturalisation to become an Irish citizen, and that stability compelled me to think about what I could do to become an active participant in bringing about positive change. I started to find my voice.” At the time, van der Merwe says she felt an “urgent sense of responsibility” in the face of the burgeoning climate crisis and global biodiversity loss. She decided to embark on a master’s in renewable energy and environmental finance at UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School, dropping to part-time hours with Google to facilitate her studies. “My master’s marked a sea change for me—a deliberate journey of exploration. The key was finding the strength to speak up about the things that are important to me, and that’s not necessarily easy to do,” says van der Merwe. Once her master’s was complete, she joined Trócaire, where she became Financial Planning and Analysis Manager, supporting the NGO’s carbon measurement and reporting processes, and developing organisational carbon budgets.  “I wanted to return to working with an NGO, on a short-term contract. I was looking for a total contrast to the powerful, cash-rich corporate world—a grounding experience, working in a much more resource-constrained environment. “Fortunately, thanks to my network, a nine-month role came through with Trócaire and I stayed with them for a year-and-a-half. “I really grew with Trócaire. It is an amazing organisation with many passionate, committed people who are so bold in how they approach the change they want to make. That perspective was invaluable.” Transformational projects In the years since—and now on the cusp of taking up a new role with Hometree, the nature restoration charity—van der Merwe has worked as a sustainability consultant, lending her considerable expertise to the advancement of transformational projects at the intersection of finance, social and environmental sustainability. Her advocacy efforts extend beyond this work, however, to a range of voluntary roles, including board member with the Irish Social Enterprise Network and advisory committee member with Friends of the Earth Ireland. Van der Merwe is also a member of Chartered Accountants Ireland Sustainability Working Group. “My approach is to use systems thinking to look at sustainability in a holistic way across a multitude of spaces, and to introduce this concept wherever I have a platform,” she says. “People often think of ESG solely from an environmental perspective, forgetting about the social piece. In actuality, both are highly interdependent and very much impact each other.  “Then, you have to look at the problem of who has a voice and who doesn’t? I am fortunate to have a voice, but others don’t. Often, decisions are made that impact them and they have no influence.” Van der Merwe has just completed a postgraduate certificate in climate entrepreneurship at Trinity College Dublin. “In everything I do today, I think back to that time just before I started my master’s in renewable energy and environmental finance when I felt like I was waiting for other people to come and save us all,” van der Merwe says. “I found my voice and now I want to continue to build my network, experience as much as I can and do as much as I can to change society for the better and support the fight against the climate crisis.  “I think a lot of people are nervous about taking action, or feel, like I did, that others will do it better on their behalf—but, right now, we are at an absolutely pivotal stage.  “The existing system—the old way of doing things—is dying. It is going to change and what we do now will determine the new system that emerges.  “We really need the silent majority to speak up to support ESG. We are the cavalry, and I don’t think we can afford to be complacent, particularly in the face of current developments, such as the backtracking we are currently seeing in the US under Donal Trump’s presidency.” Interview by Elaine O’Regan

NTR’s Marie Joyce, FCA, tells Accountancy Ireland about her career path to  sustainability and hopes and expectations for Ireland’s renewable energy future Marie Joyce, FCA, is Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer with NTR. Joyce joined the Irish infrastructure investment company in 2004 and was appointed to the role of Deputy Group Chief Financial Officer in 2010, followed by Group Commercial Director two years later. She assumed her current dual role in 2013 and is also an Independent Non-Executive Director to both daa plc and Staycity Group. QTell us a bit about yourself and why you decided to become a Chartered Accountant. Growing up on a working farm in rural Ireland in a family with six children, hard work and commitment were ingrained in us from an early age.  I’ve always been passionate about finance and nature, and I feel fortunate that my career allows me to combine both. That said, my career path wasn’t always clear-cut. I knew I wanted to be challenged every day and work towards something meaningful.  At that time, in 1990s Ireland, the jobs market looked very different to today. Career opportunities were thin on the ground.  I was fortunate to be selected by Arthur Andersen to train with the firm as a Chartered Accountant, and that training would ultimately become the foundation for my entire career. Since then, I’ve had the privilege of working across multiple sectors, from biotech to infrastructure and now clean energy transition.  What excites me most is navigating fast-paced change—whether it’s driving rapid growth, executing mergers and acquisitions or steering high-pressure restructurings.  The common thread in my career has been the ability to adapt, innovate and lead through transformation. Q. What does your work as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer with NTR involve?  I have been with the NTR group for over 20 years working across Ireland, the UK and the US. Over the past decade, in particular, I have been instrumental in driving our growth and evolution. My role today with NTR encompasses three main strands of activity: Fundraising and acquisitions: product design (investment propositions), supporting fund launches and fundraising (in particular fund structuring, marketing and legal documents, negotiations and investor due diligence), approval of investment bids and acquisitions. Financial: managing our funds, including governance and risk, and their underlying investments, as well as investor reporting and investor relations.  Operations: managing risk, human resources, public relations, legal, information security and digital transformation. Q. What does NTR do? Tell us about the organisation.  NTR is a specialist renewable energy asset manager with close to five decades’ experience in infrastructure investment and management.  We specialise in acquiring, developing and operating sustainable infrastructure projects, focusing on wind, solar and energy storage across Europe.  We are based in Dublin and currently manage 1.4 gigawatts of energy across 66 locations in seven European countries. We have an additional 500 megawatts in development, totalling €2 billion in invested capital.  Q. What does it mean to you to be part of an organisation with this renewable energy legacy? NTR’s first investment in renewable energy dates back to 1999, so renewables are truly in our DNA.  I’ve always loved the idea of generating power from natural resources—wind, sun and water—without harming the environment.  Growing up in the countryside in Ballymoe, Co. Galway, we lived off the land, growing our own vegetables and raising our own meat, without fully realising the value of this organic, self-sufficient way of life.  As a society, this is what we need to return to—working with nature rather than against it—and I am proud to be part of NTR, an organisation with a longstanding commitment to clean power. Q. How important is Ireland’s renewable energy sector to the future of our economy?  I believe Ireland’s renewable energy sector can be instrumental to the future of our economy and climate goals. The Government’s Climate Action Plan has set targets to reduce Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions by 51 percent by 2030 and reach climate neutrality by 2050.  These goals are ambitious and the ongoing shift to renewable energy will be crucial in allowing us to achieve them. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has brought the issue of energy security to the fore for governments across Europe and Ireland is no different. Greater capacity to generate renewable energy ourselves here in Ireland would reduce our reliance on fossil fuel imports, thereby bolstering our energy security. Energy demand is rising, driven by the increasing electrification of an expanding economy and rising population. Renewables are the cheapest form of power available to meet this growing demand. Developing and constructing renewable energy infrastructure also creates direct employment.  Ireland has the potential to become a leader in renewable technologies and energy exports, particularly in offshore wind where we have a seabed 10 times the size of our landmass. Q. What do we need to do now to support the future of Ireland’s renewable energy sector?  At a national level, faster planning and permitting policies are needed for renewable energy infrastructure.  This is a major hurdle today. If our Climate Action Plan targets are to be met, reform of the planning system is urgently needed.  I would like to see national climate targets embedded in local planning policy. If the development of our renewable energy infrastructure were to be viewed as an overriding public interest, the true potential of renewable deployment in Ireland could be unlocked. Our grid needs continuous modernisation to meet the growing demands of the economy and accommodate a growing share of intermittent renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar.  The grid must become more flexible, with greater storage capacity and enhanced interconnectivity with other countries, such as the introduction of new interconnectors like our planned Celtic Interconnector with France.  Q. Who do you most admire in public life today in Ireland or globally?  Pascal Donohoe is a longstanding and skilled politician whose career trajectory I find particularly resonant as we are contemporaries.  His stewardship of Ireland’s economy through multiple crises stands out—from Brexit uncertainties to the COVID-19 pandemic and now, today, we could not be in better hands as he navigates Ireland through US President Donald Trump’s tariff war. His competence combined with measured, thoughtful communication are qualities that have become increasingly valuable in our current era of political polarisation.  Unusually for a politician, he also generally directly answers the questions that are put to him. Q. What are the three most important lessons you have learned in your own career?  The three most important lessons I’ve learned are: You are yourself and that is good enough—embrace your unique strengths, perspectives and style. A smile never goes astray—a positive attitude and a warm approach goes a long way. Enjoy the journey—life is short, celebrate the wins, get enough sunshine. Q. What advice do you have for Chartered Accountants starting out in their career today? Qualifying as a Chartered Accountant provides invaluable professional training that will set you up for life.  When I started my own career, I thought I was simply going to become “an accountant”.  However, what my training actually gave me were the skills to become a rounded business professional. As my career has progressed, I have been able to extend those skills into shaping, running and advising businesses.  The biggest surprise for me, looking back, is the realisation that my greatest career progress has often come about when things haven’t gone to plan.  Those challenging situations that pushed me outside my comfort zone—forcing me to grow, adapt and develop new skills—were pivotal in taking me to new levels, especially as a woman in finance and infrastructure—which, 30 years ago, was very much a man’s world.  So, my advice to those starting out today is to do your very best, enjoy the experience—and don’t be afraid to ask questions or put your hand up if you think something is not right.  

Supporting the diverse and intersectional experiences of individuals within the LGBTQIA+ and Ability communities is a must for employers in today’s workplace Making it in today’s professional world isn’t always easy, but some people have extra obstacles to overcome.  Mark Scully, FCA, founder of Braver Coaching & Consulting said that, as a neurodivergent person who was undiagnosed for some time, he had faced significant challenges at work as he “attributed all the fault” to himself for tasks he felt he could not do to the same level as his colleagues.  “That seriously impacted my mental health—I was kicking myself for not being able to do these tasks like everyone else,” Scully explained.  “I was continuously working harder or longer, trying to compensate, until I burnt out—and because I didn’t know I was neurodivergent, I was engaging in a lot of masking and compensation strategies in order to make the workplace more tolerable.  “Once I did find out that I am autistic, I was afraid to let people know because I didn’t know how they would take it or thought they would not believe me and would question my credibility.” A state of isolation With little to no talk of neurodiversity in the workplace at the time, Scully found himself feeling isolated and fearing what people may say if they found out. “I couldn’t see anyone there whom I could relate to as being neurodivergent. Of course, there are lots of famous, high-profile people who are neurodivergent— but I couldn’t relate to them. So, I felt very alone and didn’t feel like there was anyone I could turn to for help,” Scully said. Sensory differences also made work difficult for Scully, as he has hypersensitive hearing and found himself straining to understand what was being said at times.  “I was genuinely in fear of going to client lunches due to the noise levels in some places. I would struggle to hear anything at the table,” he said.  “Other issues included not understanding workplace norms or ‘unwritten rules’ and trying to understand what people were looking for or what their expectations of me might be, so I just assumed I had to be perfect. This all had a big impact on me, and I found it very challenging.” Despite these challenges, Scully followed an impressive career path as a qualified barrister, Chartered Accountant and Chartered Tax Advisor, who had ascended to director level in a Big Four practice by the time he was diagnosed with autism. “It was a big relief being diagnosed,” he said, “finally, I could have some compassion for myself and know that there are areas I’m not going to be as good as everyone else in. However, there are other areas I’m incredibly good at. It is just about focusing on the strengths and asking for help in other areas. I’m in a really good place now.” Removing fear from the conversation Feeling safe enough to ask for help or understanding from colleagues and managers is crucial, said Scully, as “fear needs to be removed from the conversation”.  “I was afraid to let anyone know I was neurodivergent, because I didn’t know how it would be accepted and, in that vacuum, I had built it up so much in my head,” he said.  “But when I did let people know, there was no bad reaction, and it was actually received well, but I didn’t know this in advance, and it makes you start fearing the worst. We need to talk about it so neurodivergent people know that they have support in the workplace and feel safe to ask for help.  “Managers may be terrified of saying the wrong thing, so while training on language is useful, it’s also important for them to know that it’s okay to make mistakes in one-on-one conversations as long as they have the right intention. It’s much better to talk about this and make mistakes than not talk about it all.  “Talk, engage and be curious. Nobody is expected to be an expert in somebody else’s neurodivergence, it’s totally unique to them. So, managers and HR people should learn about what neurodivergence means for that particular person by talking to them.  “They should look past the label and get to understand the person, their particular needs and their strengths as everyone is unique. It’s all about starting the conversation.  Following his own diagnosis, Scully went on to found Braver Coaching and Consulting (gobraver.com) to promote neurodiversity in Irish workplaces and provide executive coaching to young professionals, both neurotypical and neurodivergent. Organisation-wide benefits of neuro-inclusion Scully said that, by providing training and making the necessary accommodations, employers could help to improve mental health for neurodivergent people, delivering organisation-wide benefits.  “If people feel like they’re working in a place that accepts them, and they don’t have to engage in masking or compensation strategies each day, it will have such a benefit for their mental health, in my opinion,” he said.  “If an organisation is not talking about neuro-inclusion, then it is not serious about mental health.   “By taking steps to be more inclusive, companies should see increased employee retention and productivity, and there is substantial funding available to support employees with disabilities.” From a bottom-line return-on-investment perspective, it makes sense to have a culture of neuro-inclusion, Scully said.  “Learning how to be a neuro-inclusive manager just results in better managers for everyone, full stop. It’s also the right thing to do, from a reputational perspective, because graduates are looking at employers that they may potentially work for and they are very well-informed about diversity.  “In the battle for talent, neuro-inclusive workplaces will entice the exceptionally bright and wonderful graduates who can offer a diverse range of thought, creativity and strength.”   Celebrating love, acceptance and diversity Jaimie Dower, Executive Director, Audit Quality Programme at EY, agrees with Scully that employer support for all employees with diverse experiences, is crucial. As a transgender woman who has struggled with identity, Dower acknowledged the important role EY, her employer, had played in being “vocally and visibly an ally and advocate for LGBTQ+ inclusion for a long time”. “As an employee with 30 years’ experience with the firm, this was a source of immense pride for me,” Dower said.  “To work for a firm that acknowledges and celebrates love, acceptance and diversity really makes a difference.  “Work isn’t and shouldn’t be the most important part of our lives, but it is a place where we spend a huge amount of time, so the relationships and experiences we have there are key to our emotional and physical wellbeing.  “The knowledge that I work somewhere that people are free to be, and to bring their authentic selves to work, really matters.” Dower, who initially tried to keep her “authentic self a secret from all but closest family” decided to come out during the COVID-19 lockdown.  She received immediate support from work colleagues, but the process was not without challenge.  “As I started to navigate conversations with HR, our DE&I team and my friends and colleagues, I started to realise that the firm’s commitment to LGBTQ+ inclusion was not just lip service or pinkwashing, it was a genuine part of the culture of the firm and its people,” she said.  “Despite this, there are very distinct challenges I faced, which employers need to be conscious of.  “The first one was how to tell people. It’s important to allow people the space to work this out and to acknowledge that there is no ‘right’ way; no one-size-fits-all answer. I had support in planning those conversations. Clear boundaries and guidelines  “It is really important that there are clear boundaries with regard to what any individual wants to share. I didn’t want to be—and, emotionally, couldn’t have coped with being—a walking ‘Transgender 101’ class for everyone.  “It was important for that to be acknowledged. Another challenge was that I never anticipated the number of times I would need to update my name, gender marker and picture. What seems like a simple ask can sometimes become mired in a morass of procedure. There has to be a way to make this simpler. “The issue most people will be aware of is around bathrooms and it’s hard to explain how much mental and emotional space such a small thing now occupies in my life. It’s a consideration every time I go outside the door and the important thing is that employers are very clear in their policies and transparent on this.” The EY Executive Director said that there had been tough days but also “so much joy and positivity, including being able to assist in the refresh of EY Ireland’s Gender Identity, Expression and Transition Guidelines”.  And while her personal journey is not complete, Dower said she feels privileged to work for a firm where she is free to be herself—something which should be the norm. “We all have to work together to combat homophobia, biphobia and transphobia and to actively ensure acceptance and understanding in everything we do,” she said.  “Employers should consider ensuring that there are guidelines to cover discrimination of all sorts, and everyone should respect the pronouns of transgender or non-binary colleagues or friends. That’s just one conscious mindful step that can make someone feel respected, included and valued. “Any organisation that flies a flag that says ‘you can be yourself here’ is going to attract the best candidates and get the most from them.” This article has been produced in collaboration with BALANCE, Chartered Accountants Ireland’s LGBTQIA+ networking group, and the Institute’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee. To find out more about their work or how to get involved, contact Karin Lanigan, Head of Members Experience, tel: +353 1 637 7331, email: Karin.Lanigan@charteredaccountants.ie.

Stephen Prendiville explains how smart and responsible investment in infrastructure can have a transformative effect on societies With Ireland’s population set to swell to 5.7 million by 2040, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to use infrastructural planning to support a better future for all. So says Stephen Prendiville, FCA, Infrastructure and Real Estate Advisory Partner and Sustainable Infrastructure Leader at Deloitte Ireland. “New homes, jobs and amenities will be needed to meet both basic needs and deliver a good quality of life for all, and infrastructure is critical,” Prendiville says.  “We have a once-in-a-generation infrastructure investment requirement, and we need to deliver it in a manner aligned with criteria that will make it good for all.” As Prendiville sees it, smart and responsible investment in infrastructure can have a transformative effect on societies. “It’s about looking at infrastructural spend from the perspective of wider potential benefits, rather than just the ‘money lens’, and encouraging governments to improve how they prioritise infrastructure and support dialogue between key stakeholders to create a more sustainable economy and society,” he says. Sustainable infrastructure: early start In his work today with public and private sector clients, Prendiville’s focus is on ensuring we deliver our collective infrastructure requirements to reach climate neutrality by 2050 and improve society for future generations. His own interest in infrastructural planning emerged early in his career when he was training as a Chartered Accountant with KPMG in Dublin. “I owe my start to Michele Connolly at KPMG who gave me my first taste of infrastructure back in the 2000s,” Prendiville says. “I worked on some of the biggest projects in the country at the time, including our road network and the first iteration of Metro North. Then, like many towards the end of the noughties, we left Ireland after the financial crash and moved to Canada. It was there I got my first real experience of sustainable development in a live environment.”  Prendiville would remain in Canada for close to a decade, working with big cities, including Toronto, Vancouver, Edmonton and Montreal, to deliver sustainability and resilient infrastructure goals.  “I was working with cities and municipalities utilising public transport to improve citizens’ lives and livelihoods by creating opportunities to bolster economic development and tackle social deprivation,” he says. “A lot of professionals working in infrastructure are driven by the tangible impact they can have, whether that relates to hospitals, schools, renewable energy or transport, but it wasn’t until the introduction of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2016 that I really had a solid framework for understanding sustainability in the context of infrastructure.”  The United Nations’ 17 SDGs (see panel on pg. 43) form the framework for achieving a better and more sustainable future for all by 2030. The 17 goals are interconnected—one cannot be achieved at the expense of another. “Looked at in totality, the SDGs are about advancing a wider sustainable outcome from a societal perspective,” Prendiville says. “If we’re going to challenge ourselves to deliver sustainable infrastructure, we have to always ask ourselves, ‘what am I not thinking about here in the context of what this project is?’ “It’s very easy to look at a wind farm solely as a clean energy project, for example. More than likely, it could offer other opportunities linked to the SDGs in the context of jobs, skills, biodiversity and habitat. That’s really where the concept of ‘infrastructure for good’ comes in.”  Infrastructure for good The Infrastructure for Good report was published in 2023 by Economist Impact with support from Deloitte and Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability in the US. The barometer benchmarked the capacity of 30 countries to sustainably deliver infrastructure addressing social, economic and environmental needs, across five pillars: Governance and planning. Sustainable financing and investment. Social and community impact. Economic benefits and empowerment. Environmental sustainability and resilience.  Among the 30 countries analysed, Canada and the UK performed best. The barometer revealed, however, that—while most countries prioritise governance and planning—the financing and execution of infrastructure projects is often insufficient to deliver positive social outcomes.  “Ireland placed sixth in the barometer, which is a good result, but we fell down in the area of community engagement and benefit realisation at a localised level,” Prendiville says. “This is really about the idea that a project is narrowly defined relatively early and, while the community is allowed to contribute to the public consultation, it is not necessarily involved in co-creating the solution, nor is the solution delivering additional community benefits.   “An example might be a new bypass delivered by a department: the benefits case for the bypass will be that it’s going to remove a certain number of vehicles from a town centre, improving quality of life for the community. “The flipside is that there will be no money for the town to actually grab the opportunity the new bypass presents and realise potential benefits. They will get the road, but their local authority will have to come up with the rest themselves. “That won’t necessarily happen though, because the local authority might have several other priorities they need to deliver. So, doing what’s needed to unlock those benefits might fall by the wayside.  “Put simply, when we define a project’s goals too early, and to the delivery agent’s mandate, we miss out on the opportunity to realise the full breadth of benefits that might exist. “The opportunity for Ireland is to be the standout country in getting this right and doing this better in the context of an infrastructure for good framework.” Once-in-a-generation opportunity The roll-out of Project Ireland 2040, the Government’s national planning and capital expenditure strategy, marked an important milestone in Ireland’s sustainable planning policy, Prendiville says.  Launched in 2018, Project Ireland committed €165 billion in capital investment to fund vital infrastructure in areas such as housing, transport, education, enterprise and climate action at a time of significant population growth. More recently, The Programme for Government 2025, published in January, recommitted to the Climate Action Plan goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, as well as fast-tracking planning for offshore wind development and increasing home retrofitting targets in the years ahead. “I take a lot of heart from the Programme for Government,” Prendiville says. “I think we have transitioned in terms of our thinking. We’re no longer asking, ‘what do we need to do?’ We know we need to act. “We know that, in the world around us, we have a fundamentally changing economy and disrupted economic model.  “As a country, we need to strengthen our infrastructure to support changes on the global stage and we have a social requirement to build sustainable infrastructure for a growing population. “We need to think in terms of proactive decarbonisation, housing and new communities, the new economic models, sectors and industries we need for our workforce, and our participation in Europe and on the global stage from the perspective of foreign direct investment. “We already know probably 90 percent of what we need to do, and now it’s about moving forward bravely with our execution–and the social license to undertake this generational build programme shouldn’t be taken for granted.   “We owe it to the future generations to get it done as fast as possible, but, ultimately, to get it done well so that it lasts the test of time.” Interview by Elaine O’Regan  

The Financial Reporting Council’s updated guidance on going concern reporting offers a more comprehensive framework for assessing risk in an era of heightened uncertainty, writes Aisling Treacy In today’s dynamic business environment, economic volatility and market disruptions have heightened the focus on “going concern” in financial reporting.  In the UK, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) plays a key role in setting standards and regulations. The FRC has updated its guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks) (the Guidance), replacing the 2016 edition with immediate effect.  This update reflects the evolving business environment and provides a more focused framework for UK companies, building upon the 2016 edition used by directors across many jurisdictions, including Ireland.  The Guidance calls for greater transparency and more detailed risk disclosures, especially around solvency and liquidity challenges.  Directors should adopt a forward-looking approach, assessing current and future risks to ensure companies are prepared for uncertainties, while maintaining trust with investors and stakeholders. Guidance overview The Guidance builds upon the previous 2016 edition, expanding its scope to provide a more comprehensive framework for directors.  It is intended for all UK companies, excluding small and micro-entities, and includes companies adhering to the UK Corporate Governance Code. The Guidance consolidates various UK company law requirements, accounting and auditing standards, listing rules, the UK Corporate Governance Code and other relevant regulations.  It aims to help directors assess their company’s ability to continue as a going concern and ensure that any material uncertainties are appropriately disclosed. Disclosures should be proportional to the company’s risk profile, helping maintain transparency and supporting investor confidence. The following section outlines the key updates to the Guidance.  Key Guidance updates Focus on material uncertainties  The Guidance places greater emphasis on identifying and disclosing material uncertainties that could affect a company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Directors should assess both immediate and emerging risks and outline strategies to mitigate them.  The Guidance integrates solvency and liquidity risks into material uncertainty disclosures for the first time, reflecting their importance to a company’s viability.  If doubt arises about the going concern assumption, directors must disclose related risks in line with the “true and fair view” requirement. For the first time, the FRC recognises four potential scenarios regarding the going concern basis of accounting. Previously, the Guidance outlined three:  No material uncertainty. Material uncertainty with appropriate disclosure. The going concern basis of accounting is not appropriate.  The updated Guidance introduces a fourth scenario where the going concern assumption is appropriate and there are no material uncertainties, but significant judgement was required to reach this conclusion.  Graphic 2 below outlines the decision-making process, highlighting the fourth scenario.  Broader view on solvency and liquidity  The Guidance broadens the focus on solvency and liquidity risks. Solvency refers to the company’s ability to meet its long-term obligations, focusing on business sustainability and capital maintenance.  In contrast, liquidity concerns the availability of cash and other resources needed to fund day-to-day operations.  Directors are encouraged to assess both aspects to identify potential risks and aim to manage cash flow effectively.  Forward-looking approach A more forward-looking approach is encouraged in assessing a company’s going concern status. This involves developing detailed financial forecasts and testing a range of scenarios, from normal to extreme worst-case conditions.  Techniques such as stress testing, sensitivity analysis and reverse stress testing can help evaluate potential adverse conditions such as economic downturns, inflation, interest rates and geopolitical events.  For example, management may simulate the impact of an economic recession, sudden regulatory change or a disruption to the supply chain, to assess how these events could affect the company’s ability to continue operating.  This proactive approach may help companies prepare for potential challenges and better position themselves to navigate uncertainty.  Revised approaches to materiality and disclosure placement   The Guidance introduces detailed changes to materiality and disclosure placement. Directors are encouraged to clearly explain the assumptions, methodologies and significant judgements in their going concern assessment.  For example, if uncertainty exists over meeting debt obligations due to fluctuating interest rates, directors should outline assumptions about future cash flow projections, liquidity risk assessments and judgements regarding financing.  Disclosures should be proportionate to material uncertainties, particularly those related to financial and liquidity positions. This means focusing on significant uncertainties, such as refinancing debt or sales downturn, while avoiding over-disclosure of less significant risk.  Directors should consider the placement of disclosures to facilitate effective communication. Grouping similar disclosures reduces duplication and highlights linkages. Cross-referencing ensures key information is accessible and demonstrates consistency throughout the annual report.  Broader applicability and group considerations  The Guidance applies to a wider range of companies, including those adhering to the UK Corporate Governance Code.  Directors of subsidiary companies should assess the ability of parent companies or fellow subsidiaries to provide support for the going concern basis, considering group arrangements such as cross-guarantees or cash pooling, which can expose subsidiaries to additional risks.  Subsidiaries should disclose significant judgements about the support they receive from parent companies or fellow subsidiaries and the risks associated with group-wide going concern assessments. Auditors’ responsibilities  The Guidance affects auditors by defining their role in evaluating the going concern assumption.  Auditors must assess whether the directors’ assumptions align with accounting standards and are adequately supported by disclosures.  If material uncertainties are not sufficiently addressed, they should challenge the directors’ judgements and ensure that material uncertainties are disclosed. What these changes mean for management 1. Strategic decision-making  The Guidance calls for a more strategic approach to going concern assessments. Management should integrate short-term liquidity and long-term sustainability assessments into strategic and risk management processes. Directors should consider future risks, including planned investments, economic changes and market conditions. 2. Communication and reporting Clear and transparent communication is a key focus. Companies should now disclose material uncertainties regarding going concern in a more detailed and accessible way. The company’s narrative regarding its financial health and strategic direction should align with the going concern assessment to ensure that investors and other stakeholders have confidence in the company’s prospects. 3. Risk management and scenario planning The Guidance emphasises scenario analysis and stress testing, requiring management to develop flexible risk management strategies. Simulating extreme events, such as recessions or supply chain disruptions, helps companies understand vulnerabilities.  Questions directors may ask of management  The following questions may help guide the navigation of the Guidance. While directors may have asked some of these questions in the past, the expanded Guidance encourages them to consider a wider range of factors.  Is the standard 12-month assessment period appropriate, or do we need a longer assessment period? Have we considered all material risks, including market volatility, regulatory changes and reputational risks? What significant judgements were applied in determining the going concern basis, and how are these disclosed? Have we assessed the impact of potential future disruptions, such as geopolitical risks and supply chain challenges, and incorporated forward-looking scenarios and stress tests to evaluate their effect on viability? Are financial forecasts and plans sufficiently robust to withstand adverse scenarios? Do we have access to sufficient liquidity and financing options in a crisis or downturn? Is the board engaged in the going concern process and actively reviewing the assumptions and conclusions? Have we documented the going concern process in a manner that is transparent? Is the audit committee involved in reviewing the going concern conclusion, ensuring that all material risks have been adequately assessed and disclosed? Are we effectively communicating our going concern assessment and related risks to stakeholders?  A more robust and transparent future The updates signal a shift towards more transparent, forward-looking financial reporting, responding to the changing risk landscape, including geopolitical and economic factors.  With the transition from the 2016 Guidance to the 2025 framework, directors are encouraged to apply this modernised and robust approach to going concern reporting.  The updated Guidance offers a clearer and more comprehensive framework for assessing risk in an era of heightened uncertainty.  Directors are encouraged to take this opportunity to strengthen their strategic approach, ensuring their companies are better prepared to face future challenges and adapt to an evolving risk environment.  Aisling Treacy is a Director with KPMG Ireland 

Fastcom Managing Director Lorraine Gribbons, FCA, reflects on her journey from auditing to leading a regional business, championing gender equity in leadership and the challenge of achieving work-life balance in the fast-moving telecoms industry I became Managing Director of Fastcom over eight years ago, bringing with me my background in Chartered Accountancy and a deep-rooted passion for driving business growth.  My foundation as a Chartered Accountant, with its emphasis on strategic thinking, attention to detail and problem-solving, proved instrumental as I transitioned into the telecoms sector.  Although I hadn’t initially envisioned a future in this industry, I found myself increasingly drawn to the challenge of scaling a regional business on a national level.  This challenge became my mission: how to expand Fastcom’s footprint across Ireland while remaining true to our Sligo roots.  I am very proud of the company’s achievements. Under my leadership, Fastcom has grown into one of Ireland’s most flexible telecoms providers, built on a foundation of innovation, regional pride and dedicated commitment to customer care.  My focus is on positioning the company as one of Ireland’s top technology leaders—not just in terms of the services we offer, but also in how we lead, innovate and support our people.  This includes continuing to break barriers—for women in leadership, regional businesses and anyone who dares to grow beyond what’s expected.  Robust career pathway As far back as I can remember, accountancy was what I wanted to do. I’m not sure where that came from, but it was always on my radar as the route I wanted to take and the qualification I would ultimately achieve.  I attended school in Sligo and then went on to study Business, Economics and Social Studies at Trinity College Dublin.  I had worked in an accountancy practice in Sligo in the summer following my first year at college and then went on to complete a summer work placement organised by Trinity after my third year, in the audit department of KPMG in Dublin.  This experience gave me great insight into what the trainee programme would be like and I started my training contract with KPMG after completing my degree the following year.  Qualifying as a Chartered Accountant gave me excellent education and training, providing valuable insight into business operations and a robust pathway for career progression and opportunities.  Once my training contract was completed, I decided to move back west to Sligo, where I worked as an Audit Manager with Gilroy Gannon for over 10 years before transitioning into industry with Fastcom. I became the company’s Managing Director soon after the move.  Women in leadership: moving beyond the exception Moving from the world of finance and accounting into telecoms, I’ve worked in two industries where women in leadership were once the exception, not the norm.  I’ve seen some progress in gender equity over the years, but it is slow, and there is definitely room for improvement.  I recall my accountancy training days, when many of the more junior staff members were female, but the senior roles were nearly always male-dominated. There are certainly more women at the top table now, and the conversations are evolving, but there’s still work to be done.  I would love to see more women in senior roles across all industries, as well as increased support at key transition points in a woman’s career, such as returning from maternity leave or aspiring to leadership.  Family responsibilities also play a part in the progress of gender equity, as balancing these with an evolving career can be a challenge.  Helping others reach their potential Mentoring and networking have played a huge role in my career, even if not always in formal ways.  I have been fortunate to have had people whom I could look to for mentorship; they have given me honest feedback and encouragement when I’ve needed it most at all stages of my career. Just as importantly, I’ve always believed in helping others reach their full potential in their own careers, wherever and whenever I can.  Networking, too, has opened unexpected doors, whether through industry events, local business groups, education sessions or informal chats over coffee.  The moving target of work-life balance Work-life balance is a bit of a moving target, isn’t it?  For me, it’s not about getting it right every day as I don’t think that’s possible. Some weeks are more work-intensive, while others allow for space to recharge.  My biggest challenge is switching off, as I find this very difficult to navigate.  When running your own business, you’re fully invested, and this sometimes spills over into downtime. For me, it does depend on what’s happening at work and how pressing any issues might be.  It’s something I know I always have to keep working on and be very conscious of.  As great as technology is, especially when working in a technical industry, the ability to disconnect from your phone and emails is vital during personal time.  I have learned over the years that rest is just as important as work for long-term success. You need to be able to refuel yourself to keep going and bring your best to the business.  With three children, my own “rest time” is still busy, but it’s  great for distracting me from the office and what’s going on at work.  Learning from your own team Over the years, I have found real value in professional development programmes, leadership courses and peer learning. Sometimes, though, the most impactful learning comes from within your own team.  Listening, collaborating and remaining open to diverse perspectives has enabled me to grow and develop personally.  I am always reading a wide variety of business materials and books to gather ideas for Fastcom and for myself personally, so that I can continue to thrive. Interview by Liz Riley  

Is the environmental, social and governance movement in decline? We ask three of our Chartered Stars, each recognised for their outstanding work in support of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, for their take on the future of ESG Evan O’Donnell Chartered Star 2024 Accountant with Avery Dennison   As a Chartered Accountant, I view the future of sustainability through both a financial and ethical lens.  Sustainability is increasingly becoming a key pillar of business strategies, and I believe that over the next decade, it will shift even more from a niche concern to a mainstream priority.  Companies and governments will need to integrate sustainability into their financial reporting, with transparent disclosures on environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics becoming standard practice.  The rise of green bonds, sustainable investing and carbon accounting will drive capital towards businesses that align with sustainability goals, creating a clear incentive for corporations to adopt responsible practices. Looking ahead, I hope to see a world in which sustainability is embedded in every financial decision.  Businesses should not only focus on reducing their environmental footprint but also consider the social equity and long-term resilience of their operations.  This shift will require a redefinition of value, where profit is measured alongside positive social and environmental impact, creating a more balanced approach to growth. The current transitional period in geopolitics presents challenges, however. With some countries backtracking on sustainability efforts, there is a risk of fragmentation in global initiatives.  While international collaboration is essential, the rise of protectionist policies and divergent priorities may hinder the overall progress of global sustainability targets.  As a result, I expect businesses to face increasing pressure to navigate this geopolitical uncertainty, balancing national interests with global sustainability standards. In the future, we will likely see greater local innovation in sustainability, with businesses and governments in different regions leading by example.  While there are challenges ahead, however, the growing recognition of the financial value of sustainable practices gives me hope that we will continue to move towards a more sustainable and inclusive future. Peter Gillen Chartered Star 2023 Sustainability Reporting Manager with AIB   In the future, I hope to see further consolidation of global sustainability reporting standards to simplify implementation for companies. While progress is being made, however, challenges remain. Existing EU legislation, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and EU taxonomy for sustainable activities, continue to evolve. At the same time, new measures are emerging, such as China’s recently introduced corporate sustainability reporting standards.  Continued global engagement on consolidating these is critical to encourage more companies to report against these standards. Given recent geopolitical shifts and the decision by some nations to scale back their sustainability efforts, I was initially concerned all the progress made would be undone.  However, European companies increasingly recognise the “business” rationale for sustainability, no longer viewing it simply as altruism.  Even companies outside the CSRD’s scope should still see the benefits of managing climate risks, such as rising temperatures and sea levels.  This isn’t about pandering to a “woke” environmental, social and governance (ESG) agenda, it is about ensuring the long-term viability of one’s business. Despite the recent wave of anti-ESG sentiment, there are some who are refusing to accept calls for ESG to be omitted from investment decision-making.  In the UK, for example, the People’s Pension (one of the UK’s largest pension funds) recently moved £28 billion in assets from the US asset manager, State Street, noting that it wished to prioritise sustainability, active stewardship and long-term value creation for its near seven million members.  It remains to be seen whether other funds will follow suit.  I hope funding for pro-ESG funds continues to grow; not for political reasons, but to protect the financial futures of those whose pensions and savings are managed through funds.  It will also be interesting to observe whether asset managers continue to support ESG publicly or remain silent to avoid criticism (i.e. greenhushing). Fiona Hanafin Chartered Star 2022 Associate Director, Sustainability Advisory, Grant Thornton Sustainability is evolving from being viewed merely as a compliance requirement or ‘tick box’ exercise to a strategic driver of long-term business success.  I believe businesses that are proactive in addressing sustainability-related risks will gain a competitive advantage and thrive in an uncertain world.  Climate change continues to intensify at home and abroad, and businesses need to identify and address their individual physical and transition risks.  We’ve seen how extreme weather and floods can damage infrastructure and disrupt supply chains while shifting regulations create uncertainty.  To address these risks and build resilience, companies should adopt sustainable practices within their operations and integrate sustainability into their core values and decision-making processes.  Future-focused businesses that adopt sustainability, including social considerations within their strategy, will benefit from greater appeal among talented employees and environmentally conscious consumers. I hope business leaders across Ireland and Europe continue to embrace sustainability as a driver of growth and innovation. There are opportunities to be seized by reducing carbon footprints, adopting green technologies, diversifying supply chains and prioritising responsible stewardship.  Despite all the noise (regulatory and political), the fundamentals of sustainability have not changed. We are living beyond our means; our society needs to change.  Although the sustainability agenda has faced setbacks in some regions due to regulatory and political backlash, the global trend towards adopting sustainability initiatives and reporting continues to progress.  Investment in the energy transition remains strong, cand despite the proposed delay to the introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive in the European Union, many companies are collecting data to ensure the availability of decision-making information.  Those aiming for long-term success will recognise that the broader global momentum driving sustainability is fuelled by market demand and risk mitigation.  With a well-informed sustainability strategy, businesses can protect their bottom line while making a positive global impact.

The Trump-Putin relationship is forcing NATO and the EU to shift from a competitive relationship to a strategic, collaborative mindset, writes Judy Dempsey In the wake of Russia’s 2022 invasions of Ukraine, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and the European Union have both been forced to reassess their fundamental strategic roles as guardians of Europe as they explore collaborative responses to the crisis.  The real catalyst for this strategic shift is the actions of US President Donald Trump, rather than those of Russian President Vladimir Putin.  Trump has shaken Europe, challenging its long-held belief that the US would always provide a protective umbrella. During his first term as US President, Trump criticised NATO’s European allies for underspending on defence, underscoring a perceived inequity in burden-sharing within the alliance.  Now, he has signalled his willingness to consider withdrawing the US from NATO altogether, questioning the reliability of Article 5, which commits the military alliance to defending any member country under attack.  Not anymore, Trump says—if they have not spent enough on their security. Weakened US support for NATO, or a complete exit from the alliance, would leave the EU vulnerable.   The decades-long transatlantic relationship would be dangerously undermined—a goal of successive Russian leaders.  Trump is doing Putin’s bidding by putting Ukraine’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity on the negotiating table. In doing so, the US President has ignored how Russia has repeatedly broken the ceasefire Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky agreed to in March.  With this major shift in American foreign policy, NATO and the EU, including neutral countries such as Austria and Ireland, must move fast in several ways.  First, the Europeans cannot wait for Trump to weaken his commitment to the alliance. Major NATO and EU countries—Britain, France, Germany and Poland—need to form coalitions of the willing to prepare for an eventual withdrawal of the US from NATO.  NATO’s European ‘caucus’ needs to be strengthened, military capabilities assessed and the expenditure required to compensate for a potential US exit assessed. That won’t be easy, and it will be costly. Second, the EU Commission wants member states to embrace serious defence ambitions, another costly task, requiring time and clear communication with voters.  In the meantime, there is no reason the EU and NATO cannot share capabilities under the special “Berlin Plus” arrangements, giving the EU access to NATO assets and planning capabilities if the alliance is not militarily involved. Such a partnership could serve as a foundation for an EU-led coalition of the willing for Ukraine. Third, in light of the ongoing conflict, it’s crucial for the EU and NATO to increase their military, economic and political support for Ukraine.  NATO’s European members could take over from the US leadership of the Ramstein forum, known as the Ukraine Defence Contact Group. Established in 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine, its 50 countries provide military support to Ukraine.  Finally, Germany and other countries are discussing Europe’s nuclear powers with France and the UK. This would have been unthinkable a few months ago, demonstrating just how much Trump’s relationship with Putin is upending the transatlantic relationship. Judy Dempsey is Nonresident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the April/May 2025 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees or the editor. 

Key market indicators are flashing warning signs and investors should brace for turbulence, warns Cormac Lucey Timing global equity markets is not an easy task. But when several separate indicators signal caution, it may be time for alarm.  This is currently the situation regarding US equity markets as President Donald Trump launches his much-anticipated tariff wars on America’s allies.  Signal 1: US unemployment rate In the past, when the unemployment rate in the US started to rise after many years of steady falls, it has signalled a shift in the economic cycle, often presaging recession.  The US unemployment rate hit 4.1 percent in February, up considerably from its April 2023 low of 3.4 percent.  According to BCA Research, the investment research company, there has never been a situation in which the three-month moving average unemployment rate has risen by more than a third of a percent—as is now the case—without a recession following. Signal 2: The US yield curve The yield curve depicts the differing interest rates that apply to government debt of varying maturities.  When shorter-term debt yields higher returns than longer-term debt, it is usually the result of central banks raising short-term interest rates too high.  Recession generally follows shortly after the normal state of affairs, where longer-term interest rates exceed short-term rate returns. This normal state of affairs returned last December.  Signal 3: US price/earnings ratio  Right now, the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) forward price/earnings ratio (which compares today’s price to predicted—or forward—earnings) comfortably exceeds 20. That is one of the highest S&P ratios observed in a half-century.  In the past, higher prices have tended to anticipate lower investor returns. Signal 4: US cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio A significant drawback of the conventional price/earnings ratio is that when we compare a highly inflated share price to cyclically inflated earnings, the situation can appear okay.  The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio seeks to correct this defect by dividing equity prices by their average earnings over the previous decade.  This way, the CAPE avoids the risk that cyclically elevated earnings may make cyclically elevated share prices look normal.  The CAPE ratio currently stands at 36.34 times cyclically adjusted earnings. This puts current equity values among the highest ever recorded.  If return patterns observed in the past are replicated, we might expect real equity returns (after inflation) to come in just slightly above zero over the next 15 years. Signal 5: US price/book ratio  The price/book ratio compares the market price of the equity market to the book value of the net assets on the balance sheets of those companies on the market.  The US market’s price/book ratio is currently higher than it has ever been, even at the peak of the tech bubble in 2000. When we examine our five bear market indicators, we can see that they are each signalling caution, suggesting extreme prudence regarding equity returns in the near future.  This caution is only increasing in response to the trade tensions US President Donald Trump continues to unleash.  Signal 6: US trade tariffs I expect continued turbulence as Donal Trump continues to push the trade tariff agenda he unveiled to the world on 2 April.  We might hope for signs of compromise to lead a relief rally, but the upshot in the first instance has been upheaval in the markets.  While the tariffs may be the catalyst that has unleashed this upheaval, however, it is my view that they are not the ultimate cause of the recessionary/bear market conditions we are seeing emerge in the US.  I don’t expect to see equity markets bottom out until some time later this year or early next. Investor caution Equity markets do not follow a neat pattern. They often overshoot in one direction only to then overshoot in another. Just because six key signals are all neatly pointing in one direction doesn’t mean equities will immediately fall in value. In the medium term, however, it does suggest that future returns will be weak and that investors should be cautious. Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the April/May 2025 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees or the editor. 

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions I am highly qualified with both general and specialist accountancy qualifications. I work hard to high standards and meet my deadlines. I get on well with colleagues and other stakeholders. Over the past 18 months, I’ve applied for promotion twice, but I have not been successful. Candidates I consider less qualified and experienced than me have instead secured both roles. What can I do to increase my chances of success? You feel you are being overlooked and there are several reasons why this might be happening.  One thing is for sure, however: if you want people to see you in a different light, you need to do something different.  My guess is that people expect high performance from you, so when you deliver, you may be “simply” meeting expectations.  You sound like quite a task-focused person—nothing wrong with that. Any thoughts below are intended to complement, not replace, your task focus. Your question reminds me of an executive I worked with: he shared the same high standards yet also found himself overlooked.  He always downplayed his achievements. For example, at progress meetings, he would simply say “done” in the catch-up as a way to express that he had completed a task. In today’s busy (and often hybrid) workplace, we need to be a little more intentional about how we communicate. “Done” does not cut it.  Marketing people talk about “selling the sizzle, not the sausage” and this may be something you need to focus on. It goes without saying that long stories are not needed, but something like “I sent that out on X date. Three people replied, I’ve followed up with two more and I discovered that…” gives people a little more insight into you.  Task-focused people can come across as impatient, which can be daunting. Moving up in an organisation involves winning hearts as well as minds. Here are a few thoughts about what you can do: Focus on building relationships. This could simply mean taking a bit more time for daily interactions, or it could involve strategically building relationships to increase your visibility. Find reasons to meet with colleagues in person. Share interesting materials when you can. Work on your interview skills. In particular, you may need to build up your achievements (Google ‘competency STARS’), not just in interviews but also during performance reviews. If you haven’t already done so, get feedback on recent interviews.  Ask your manager or others knowledgeable about your field to support you in expanding your skill set. For example, ask them to organise a mentor for you, bring you to higher-level meetings or place you on a project team. You can also attend to this yourself through reading, attending courses, etc. Reflect on how you talk about yourself. There seems to be a perception that, despite your high standards, you are not ready for promotion. Perceptions can take a while to change. Honest feedback from people who have your back may be the most useful input of all. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant with Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie

The safe stewardship of the accountancy profession means tackling the challenge of career burnout and prioritising work-life balance for the next generation, writes Dr. Caroline McGroary, FCA Like many professions globally, accountancy strives to be a beacon of excellence, with our members balancing multi-faceted roles as trusted business leaders and gatekeepers of the public interest.  Bestowed by decades of attracting and retaining the world’s brightest minds, this status ensures the safe stewardship of our profession from one generation to the next.  As we sit at this critical juncture in the history of our profession and contemplate our future, we are propelled to consider some of the greatest opportunities and challenges facing our profession and the next generation of business leaders.  In this article, we delve deeper into one such area of interest—namely the attractiveness of the profession to the next generation and the importance they are placing on well-being and work-life balance (or work-life harmony, as it is now commonly referred to). To focus this debate, we explore the concept of burnout, a topic of major concern for those at any stage of their career and one that is firmly on the agenda of well-being teams across professions, particularly in April, during Stress Awareness Month.   Burnout and the next generation The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) describes accountancy as “the language of business”. While this adage has been true for more than a century, our roles have changed drastically. In addition to providing robust financial information, accountants now assume the role of business leaders, responsible for actively leading and transforming organisations across industries and regions. Despite these changing roles, it has for many years been widely documented that working long hours, enduring stressful working environments and sacrificing personal time for work demands, is an “accepted culture” in the accountancy profession.  This was further reiterated in a recent study by the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, which asked young accounting professionals about their experiences. Recurring themes in the ACCA’s Global Talent Trend 2023 report included dissatisfaction with pay, a lack of interest in their work, burnout and concerns about work-life balance and flexibility. This work further highlighted that long working hours—previously considered a badge of honour—now act as a deterrent for younger people wanting to join the industry. These views align with Deloitte’s 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey which found that work-life balance was the top priority among respondents who believe long working hours drive stress. Based on these insights, we must challenge whether long hours, stress and burnout is an “accepted culture” in our profession and if so, properly consider the long-term effects on ourselves, our colleagues, our profession and the next generation.  We have learned that burnout can prompt early-career accountants to leave their jobs, and even the profession.  Recognising the potential cost of this, we need to gain better insights into the experiences of this group of professionals.  The value of such research was evident in a study of close to 400 junior accountants published in Australia. Researchers Vincent K. Chong and Gary S. Monroe found that role ambiguity and role conflict led to job-related tension for these professionals, which in turn contributed to burnout. This subsequently led to reduced job satisfaction and organisational commitment, with the final stage being intention to leave the profession. The practical implications of this research were the insights it offered into the drivers and outcomes of burnout, and thus the potential means to better support employees and reduce turnover.  Learning experiences of trainee accountants Reflecting on our role as educators of the next generation of our profession, we also need to consider the impact of burnout on the learning experience of trainee accountants. In research conducted at Dublin City University by Professor Barbara Flood (a Chartered Accountant), organisational psychologist Professor Yseult Freeney and I, we uncovered some useful insights.  In our study of approximately 1,200 trainee accountants in Ireland, we found that these younger members of the profession reported feeling “exhaustion” on a regular basis.  This had a negative effect on their ability to attend lectures, and their interest in and enthusiasm for their studies.  Despite feelings of exhaustion, they were committed to cognitively engaging in their studies, however, as they recognised the importance of passing their exams for career progression.  The main concerns emerging from this research included the type of learning taking place at the trainee stage and how these experiences were shaping their view of the profession—some referred to “feelings of resentment”, “anxiety” and “mental drain”.  For Sinead Donovan, past President of Chartered Accountants Ireland, supporting and advocating for the next generation of accountants is a priority. During her term as President, Donovan had as her theme the “next generation” (#nextgen).  She stresses the ongoing need to understand more about the challenges facing younger accountants and their more experienced counterparts, who act as crucial role models. Donovan also expressed concerns about the findings of a recent study commissioned by the Irish Centre for Business Excellence (ICBE) Skillnet on future leaders’ perceptions, motivations, skills and needs. The study revealed that future business leaders are “stepping out of leadership ambition...to avoid burnout at the top”.  “I would challenge the view that leadership roles needed to be overtly busy and always ‘on the edge’ of stress,” Donovan says.  “While I acknowledge that people still need to be pushed and challenged, the key is knowing when this becomes too much.”  The former Chair of Grant Thornton Ireland sees an important step in addressing this problem as “assigning responsibility back to the employer to help understand the challenges facing these future leaders, provide adequate support, and in turn, showcase how leaders can exist, and indeed thrive, without burnout.” Tackling the ill effects of burnout on younger accountants will be “integral to the future of the profession,” Donovan says. Tackling burnout: the employer’s role Donovan’s view is supported by Gillian Bane, a fellow Chartered Accountant and founder of Well Work 360. Bane established the workplace health and wellbeing consultancy in 2023 having herself experienced burnout in her career post-qualification.  “I wasn’t aware at the time that I was experiencing burnout and, in hindsight, had actually suffered multiple bouts before it stopped me in my tracks,” Bane says.  She highlights the importance of employer support and understanding to help tackle the causes and effects of work-related burnout, as well as the stigma that continues to surround mental health in the workplace. “Employee support needs to be much more than offering employees coping mechanisms, such as mindfulness classes,” Bane says.  “It needs to be a combination of supporting the individual with ways of coping, monitoring work design and workload, improving team dynamics and leadership setting the culture at an organisational level.” Supporting resilience in the profession Chartered Accountants Worldwide (CAW) recently launched its inaugural global report into the resilience of the Chartered Accountancy profession—a groundbreaking study conducted by the CAW Wellbeing Taskforce in collaboration with The Resilience Institute.. This report examines the state of resilience and well-being within the profession, drawing on insights from a global survey of 697 Chartered Accountants.  While Chartered Accountants play a critical role in safeguarding financial integrity, the report found that their work often entails significant stress and complexity. “This research highlighted some of the key strengths of the accountancy profession, such as curiosity, adaptability, creativity and a strong commitment to serving clients and colleagues,” says Dee France, Wellbeing and Support Lead at Chartered Accountants Ireland and Chair of the CAW Wellbeing Taskforce. “That said, these strengths lie alongside challenges such as multitasking, avoidance, worry and sleep deprivation, which over time can reduce resilience, lead to burnout, fatigue and impact negatively on mental health.” The profession now has a unique opportunity to lead by example, cultivating workplace cultures in which well-being is not an afterthought but an integral part of daily practice, France says.  Taking action to reduce burnout There is acceptance that burnout is something that can be experienced by anyone, at any stage of their career, in any profession.  It is a multidimensional concept embedded in an ongoing complex psychological process, and associated with a range of consequences that—if not understood and addressed—will negatively impact our profession in the long run.  As accountants, we can clearly make the business case for why this topic is important and needs further attention. Equally, as members of a profession built on a bedrock of trust, integrity, competence and respect for others, we recognise our moral obligation to take action and encourage our many stakeholders to engage in this important debate.    To this end, we seek the support of the accounting profession and other professions, academics, training firms, well-being teams and senior leadership teams to work together to:   Better understand the concept of burnout; Explore the prevalence of burnout across organisations and professions; Seek to understand its root causes and effects; Provide tailored support and resources for those who may be suffering from burnout or “on the edge”; and Challenge the stigma that still exists around mental health and burnout, as well as acknowledging that it can affect anyone. Collectively, we as Chartered Accountants are in a unique position to change the trajectory of our profession when it comes to tackling concerns like burnout.  In doing so, we will continue to attract the brightest minds and empower the next generation of accountants to go forward to lead our profession in the future.  Dr. Caroline McGroary, FCA, is a Lecturer at Dublin City University and a Council Member and Education and Lifelong Learning Board Member at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Pinergy founder Enda Gunnell, FCA, set up his renewable energy start-up in 2012, playing a crucial role in laying solid foundations for Ireland’s sustainable future Groundbreaking energy transition company Pinergy has grown to generate revenues of more than €250 million in little more than a decade by doing things differently, and founder Enda Gunnell sees more room for growth.  “That’s one of the reasons I want to stay in this industry,” he says. “The Irish energy sector is going through a once-in-a-century change and, with this level of change, there is always opportunity.” Embracing change is nothing new for Gunnell, who left behind a highly successful career in practice to set up Pinergy in 2012.  He had initially come to accountancy “through the usual route”, he says. “I qualified with a B.Comm from University College Dublin (UCD) in 1989 and did the recruitment milk round, before being taken on by Mazars.  “That was the last year the B.Comm exams were held in the autumn, and I had had enough of university by that time.” Gunnell didn’t yet know what lay in store, however. “I started my training contract with Mazars and within a fortnight I was back at UCD working on their audit,” he says.  “I spent 23 years with Mazars and was involved with UCD in one way or another for quite a bit of that time. The university then became my landlord when I founded Pinergy.” Gunnell had played a role in helping UCD acquire a building adjacent to the Beech Hill Office Park and helped to develop a strategy to host partnership ventures with industry. “They had some spare space and that was our first office,” he says. Having started his career with Mazars, Gunnell later moved into consulting.  “I thoroughly enjoyed my time with Mazars. I got great exposure to a wide range of clients across different sectors, including large corporates, institutional clients and a lot of owner managed SMEs.  “I was partnering with owner managers who had 50 or 60 people working for them but had no one to talk to. I was that person.” Having been a Partner with Mazars for close to 10 years, Gunnell decided the time was right to try something new.  “I was probably looking for opportunities for a few years by that stage,” he says. “I had got a bit disillusioned with professional services and the timesheets, chargeable hours and so on. Some of the projects I found interesting were not the type of things to earn high fee income in the short term.” At the same time, Gunnell was working with owner managers, helping them to build their businesses. They were, he says, “good people”. “I found myself thinking I would love a chance to do that myself. I hadn’t really thought about what type of business I wanted to go into, I just wanted to get out there and do it.” Entrepreneurial start: the early days The year was 2012, Gunnell was 43 years of age and a Partner with Mazars.  “I figured someone would give me a job if it didn’t work out. I was open to that risk,” he says. Ireland was in deep recession at the time in the aftermath of the financial crash and Gunnell spotted an opportunity in the fledgling pay-as-you-go electricity market.  “The energy regulator was putting pressure on the electricity suppliers not to cut people off, if at all possible,” he explains.  “One of the solutions chosen was to install pay-as-you-go meters in debtors’ homes and collect the arrears through the homeowners’ electricity credit purchases.” Gunnell’s approach was somewhat different. “We used the same technology, but differently. We went into the ‘lifestyle choice’ end of the market,” he explains. “Our market was people who wanted help budgeting. We used the technology to bring the same customer experience people had become used to with pay-as-you-go mobile phone accounts.  “Ireland didn’t have a pay-as-you-go electricity market up until then.  “In the UK, 15 percent of the market was designated as pay-as-you-go and, in Northern Ireland, it was much higher than that.” Although Ireland’s electricity market had been deregulated since the late 1990s, getting a licence to supply power was not easy.  “They said they welcomed competition, but I wasn’t sure if they were really interested in small start-up players like Pinergy,” Gunnell says.  “We partnered with an existing licencee initially and got our own licence from within the industry after that. We are now one of about seven national players in the market.” The licence was just the start. Power supply is a highly capital-intensive business.  “I was very fortunate to have the support of a high net worth individual in the early years of the business. I didn’t have the financial wherewithal to do it myself,” Gunnell says. “At that time and for a long number of years, half my time was spent growing the business and the other half was spent raising the money to fund the growth.” Raising money in Ireland post-crash was no easy task.  “The banks became too conservative. No doubt they gave out money too easily to property developers, but they went to the other extreme after that.  “We did everything to raise finance, from placing ads in newspapers to issuing our own loan notes. It was real shoe leather capital.” Pinergy has evolved considerably in the years since. “The industry is very old-fashioned. Customer loyalty is not rewarded,” Gunnell says.  “The incumbents sign people up for 12 to 24 months at a discount and then jack up the prices. That encouraged people to switch to get a discount somewhere else. We decided to do things differently and run the business from the customer perspective.  “We embraced technology. We were the first electricity company to embrace smart meters.  “Customers didn’t have to go to a shop; they could buy credit online or on their phone and it would go straight onto the meter, while being able to see their consumption on an app.” Paris Climate Accord  The Paris Climate Accord in 2015 gave added impetus to the firm’s growth. “A smart meter is an energy efficiency device. The average home wastes 20 percent of its energy. Smarter users use less,” Gunnell says. “We were a challenger brand and wanted to sell less electricity to customers. The incumbents were in the business of selling kilowatts, but how can they help save energy when their business models are built on selling as much of it as possible?” Pinergy then broadened its offering by going into business with other energy technology providers in areas like micro wind, solar, LED lighting and data services.  Two of those partnerships in the solar PV and data areas are now Pinergy subsidiaries. Energy efficiency and ESG reporting  The next pivot came with the company’s move into the commercial market. “There is only so much you can do in a domestic household. We used our capability in smart metering to bring a new offer to the commercial market,” Gunnell says. “We were able to supply data on consumption along with green, renewable power.  “We help our customers understand their power consumption and why they are using more than you should at different times.  “Our business is about energy efficiency. We are supporting customers through the energy transition and providing them with the data they require for emissions and environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting.” Commercial business now accounts for 90 percent of the Pinergy portfolio.  “We pulled back a little bit from the domestic market. The State was rolling out smart meters anyway. There was no point in us duplicating that effort,” Gunnell says. Next phase of growth: energy generation Pinergy is about to embark on the next phase of its growth journey following the acquisition of a majority stake in the business by Sojitz group, the Tokyo-based multinational.  Sojitz has acquired the holding of long-term shareholders, the Coates family. “We wouldn’t have been able to achieve our growth ambitions without our previous majority shareholder,” Gunnell says. “The Coates family have been phenomenally supportive of the company and the management team over the years.  “Without their support, we might not have been able to keep going during the energy crisis and we are eternally grateful for that.  “But, to keep going and moving forward in a capital-intensive industry like ours, we need access to funds that can’t be provided by a family office.  “The Sojitz group is a huge company with 25,000 employees and is listed on the Tokyo stock exchange.” Gunnell’s ambition now is to see Pinergy evolve into a vertically integrated company with capacity to generate its own renewable energy.  “To get involved in that in any meaningful way you need hundreds of millions of euros,” he says.  “Sojitz has been in Ireland for 10 years and already has a generating capacity of of almost 250 megawatts. “They are on the same wavelength as us and share our philosophy about partnering with customers in ways that make everyone more sustainable.  “We will now be able to start building our own generating assets.  “We will also broaden out to a dual fuel offering as well as broaden the energy services capability within the business.  “When we have our generating asset base in place, we want to move back into the domestic market.” The future of sustainable energy As Gunnell sees it, the future of energy is all about sustainability. “Energy providers have a key role to play in our sustainable future,” he says. “In the past, it was about supplying power generated by burning dirty fuel. In the future, it will be about minimising consumption of clean, green, renewable power.  “We have been embracing the sustainability agenda at Pinergy for the past 10 years. We will continue to support our customers through the energy transition and help them meet their sustainability and ESG reporting obligations.” Interview by Barry McCall

This is the first MRA between CPA Australia and Chartered Accountants Ireland, who are both full members of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and collectively represent more than 215,000 members in more than 100 countries worldwide. Speaking at the signing ceremony in Melbourne, CPA Australia CEO Chris Freeland said that this agreement is a significant milestone in the relationship between the two bodies. “Signing this agreement enables our respective organisations to work together to provide high quality education programs and build the technical capabilities of accounting, business and finance professionals,” Mr. Freeland said.  “This agreement stands as a mark of our mutual commitment to share information and ideas. It broadens the global vision of our respective members and promotes the ongoing advancement of the profession in both Ireland and Australia.  “Importantly, it provides members from both professional bodies a pathway to take up each other’s designation and enhance their career opportunities.” Chartered Accountants Ireland President, Barry Doyle, FCA, CPA said “As a small island, Ireland has always been outward facing, and our members use their qualification globally. This Agreement will benefit the many Irish professionals building their careers in Australia and will allow both bodies to collaborate even more closely in supporting all our members. “The historic amalgamation of Chartered Accountants Ireland and CPA Ireland in 2024 created the largest professional body on the island, with this expanded Institute now the only Ireland-based accountancy body. CPA Ireland enjoyed an enduring relationship with CPA Australia over several decades, and there is now an exciting opportunity to build upon this for the benefit of our members and our respective economies.” The MRA was signed by Chris Freeland AM, CEO, CPA Australia and Barry Doyle, President, Chartered Accountants Ireland.