In a world where social connections fuel success, extroverts hold a natural edge. Jean Evans explains how they can supercharge their networking through authentic and considerate interactions Extroverts have a natural advantage when it comes to networking. They thrive in social situations and are energised by interacting with others. Extroverts get their energy from other people. Extroverts are the quintessential social butterflies. They can easily dominate a room and a conversation. This can be intimidating for people who identify as shy or as shy introverts. However, even for extroverts, effective networking requires some strategies and considerations. Leverage your strengths Extroverts have a natural ability to engage in conversations and connect with people. They should use their outgoing personality to their advantage by initiating conversations and showing genuine interest in others to make them comfortable. Become an active listener While extroverts enjoy talking and sharing their thoughts, it’s important to remember that networking is a two-way street. Extroverts should practise being active listeners, asking open-ended questions, and giving others their full attention to build meaningful connections. Offer help and support Extroverts can make a lasting impression by being genuinely helpful and supportive to others by sharing their knowledge, expertise or resources whenever possible. When people genuinely desire to help others, they increase the likelihood of being remembered and having a favour reciprocated. Follow up After meeting someone, the extrovert should take the initiative to follow up and nurture the connection. Send a personalised email, connect on social media or schedule a coffee meeting to continue the conversation. Effective networking requires ongoing effort and relationship-building. Attend to body language Extroverts can easily express their enthusiasm and energy through their body language. However, they should also be mindful of subtle non-verbal cues, such as maintaining eye contact, smiling and having an open posture. These signals convey approachability and engagement. Numbers matter Setting a goal and being intentional about attending networking events is crucial. Extroverts can manage meeting more people without depleting their internal battery, but successful networking is not about meeting as many people as possible. It’s about having meaningful conversations that can lead to further meetings.  You don’t want to meet more people than you can realistically follow up with after the event. Meet only three to five people per event. Networking as a long-term investment Remember that effective networking is a long-term investment, and it’s about building genuine connections rather than collecting business cards.  Networking is a marathon and not a sprint. Extroverts can leverage their social nature by making meaningful connections and expanding their professional network. Jean Evans is Networking Architect at NetworkMe

Despite mounting scepticism, financial trends suggest that ESG is here to stay even if it is under a new name. Dan Byrne explains why You’d be forgiven for doubting the staying power of the environmental, social and governance (ESG) movement given the current wave of negativity. After all, the stories of pushback are mounting.  Granted, most are coming from the US. Republicans and fiscal conservatives are openly hostile to the term. They are led by people such as Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Florida Governor/presidential contender Ron DeSantis, who dismiss the concept as “woke capitalism”, restricting business and harming profits.  But the old saying still has weight: “If America sneezes, the world catches a cold.” It’s enough negativity to make investors more wary of ESG, and boards wonder whether they need to bother with it. Is this backlash a legitimate threat to ESG? Not from where we’re standing. Follow the money The main reason ESG will survive the backlash is that the money simply isn’t following the rhetoric. ESG critics can be as loud as they want, but they’re not making the corporate world think differently.  Two-thirds of respondents to a 2023 Bloomberg survey expect firms to continue incorporating ESG metrics into their business.  Meanwhile, financial services firm Morningstar Inc. has released new data showing that the success of anti-ESG funds has fallen dramatically from its peak in the third quarter of 2022. This peak was minor compared with the total value of ESG assets.  In other words, ESG priorities remain fixed, and the money working against them is dwindling.  The only thing likely to suffer from this wave of negativity is the actual term: ‘ESG’. Rechristening ESG The true measure of the longevity of ‘ESG’ is that many in the pro-ESG camp are willing to part ways with the term. Larry Fink, head of BlackRock Inc, has said he no longer uses it because of how politicised it has become. Even McDonald’s has done away with it. Meanwhile, the same two-thirds of respondents to the Bloomberg survey said that while firms would keep pursuing ESG, they would stop using the acronym.  But none of these groups are abandoning the principles underpinning ESG.  You might call it the one potential victory of the anti-ESG brigade: a rechristening – purely because firms are worried about reputational risk. Before the current backlash, it was estimated that the value of ESG assets would reach US$50 trillion by 2025. At the start of this year, they were estimated at $41 trillion and growing.  If, in five years, we’re calling ESG something different, it probably won’t dent the underlying principles that investors, consumers and many politicians care so vocally about. So, while the ESG backlash may be loud, we’re not seeing any evidence that its principles are losing ground.  Hence, directors and other corporate leaders hearing the noise from the US and thinking the concept is almost irrelevant should think again.  ESG remains ESG, even if its name changes. Dan Byrne is a journalist with the Corporate Governance Institute

Diversity is not just about race and gender. Andrea Dermody explores the benefits of embracing neurodiversity in the workplace, fostering inclusivity for all employees Research indicates that a significant portion of the global population – 15 to 20 percent – are neurodivergent, with distinct cognitive processes. This encompasses conditions such as attention deficit disorders, autism, dyslexia and dyspraxia, adding a unique dimension to workplaces. Despite growing emphasis on diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I), the employment prospects and support for neurodivergent individuals remain inadequate. As a result, neurodivergent individuals often experience higher rates of unemployment compared with the general population. However, when organisations attract and retain neurodiverse talent, the benefits can be far-reaching. Benefits of a neurodiverse workforce A neurodiverse workforce can bring many benefits to an organisation: Increased creativity: Neurodiverse individuals often have unique perspectives and ways of thinking, which can lead to innovative ideas and solutions. Enhanced problem-solving skills: Neurodiverse individuals may approach problems differently from their neurotypical counterparts, which can lead to more effective problem-solving and decision-making. Improved productivity: By tapping into the strengths of each individual on the team, a neurodiverse workforce can be more productive and efficient. Deloitte research suggests that teams with neurodivergent professionals in some roles can be 30 percent more productive than those without them. Better employee retention: When organisations embrace neurodiversity, it creates a more inclusive and welcoming environment leading to higher employee satisfaction and retention rates. Enhanced customer relationships: A neurodiverse workforce can help an organisation better understand and meet the needs of diverse customers, leading to improved customer relationships and increased sales. Attracting and retaining neurodiverse employees To ensure the success of neurodivergent workers, Deloitte suggests the following three approaches: Revisit the hiring process: Consciously hire from diverse sources and consider how the hiring process can be made fairer by reducing artificial intelligence or natural human bias. The interview process may also require tweaking. Consider moving from abstract questions to accessing specific skills and experience, and do not assume that everyone will connect the dots the same way. Create a conducive work environment: Everyone has different working styles, but managers should consider how individuals work best and what accommodations can be made. This may be as simple as adjusting communication styles, providing workplace mentors, or considering how flexible work policies can be expanded. Provide tailored career journeys: Many organisations do not have specific policies to support neurodivergent talent. Clearer policies ensure that everyone understands them in the same way, and unspoken rules that some neurodivergent workers might otherwise miss should be codified. Tailored career paths should therefore recognise the goals, capabilities and strengths of the individual – whether neurodivergent or neurotypical. The halo effect What’s clear is that what organisations do to provide an inclusive environment for their neurodivergent workforce can have a halo effect on the entire workforce. These ‘universal accommodations’ are adjustments that benefit all employees, jobseekers or customers and make the workplace a better, safer, more inclusive place for everyone. Andrea Dermody is a diversity and inclusion consultant at Dermody

Irish organisations face geopolitical tensions, pandemic aftermath and new work norms. Boards must intensify governance, risk and compliance focus for resilience amid rapid change, says Ivan O’Brien Irish organisations are operating in a rapidly changing business environment. The war in Ukraine, the lingering aftermath of the pandemic and the shift to new ways of working all give rise to unknown risks, including cybersecurity threats. Boards must respond with an intensive focus on governance, risk and compliance (GRC) to achieve organisational goals during increasing uncertainty. Boards should view these challenges as opportunities to verify the effectiveness of existing GRC arrangements, foster continuous improvement efforts and drive progress toward a holistic GRC management system environment that helps drive long-term value and resilience. Keep reporting on track The board’s role is to monitor management’s performance against the organisation’s strategic objectives and understand how risk and uncertainty impact the organisation’s ability to achieve those objectives. Regular, timely and comprehensive management reporting allows the board and the audit committee to continuously monitor the design’s appropriateness and the GRC systems’ effectiveness. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, has demonstrated the importance of GRC systems for addressing critical situations, such as health risks, business interruptions, breakdowns in supply chains and financial losses. As a result, organisations have had to act fast and, in many cases, rethink their operational resilience approach. Data breaches pose regulatory and reputational risks to Irish and European organisations. Organisations with insufficient security solutions to protect their systems, networks and data can be fined up to €20 million or 4 percent of their annual global turnover under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The need for integrated GRC systems Overall, the events of the last several years have highlighted the necessity for organisations to adopt integrated GRC systems to achieve organisational goals, effective emergency management and a culture of integrity during times of uncertainty. By adopting integrated GRC systems, organisations are more likely to respond and recover effectively from crises and transform potential problems into business advantages. Failure to adopt an integrated approach to GRC can undermine the board’s ability to provide adequate oversight on risk and controls and lead to potential exposures that could jeopardise the organisation’s ability to continue as a going concern. This needs to be supported by an effective exchange of GRC-related information within the organisation through a board risk or GRC committee, for example. There is guidance available to boards who wish to improve GRC performance. In April 2021, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) published a new certifiable standard for compliance management systems – ISO 37301. The standard explains how organisations should implement GRC management systems to satisfy international legal norms and regulations. Implementing ISO 37301 provides assurance that risks are regularly assessed, business partners are screened, and the organisation has a working system to raise concerns. It is committed to improving its systems to deal with non-conformance. Boards can also use the COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework to evaluate their organisation’s approach to risk management. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, the principles-based framework enables boards to identify all the components of a comprehensive enterprise risk programme. Building resilience Regardless of the model employed, effective GRC management systems rely heavily on the expertise of the internal audit and risk management functions. The scale and increasing complexity of the current risk landscape demands knowledge sharing at every level of the organisation. Boards should, therefore, challenge management to invest in the resources and technological tools required to improve shared risk intelligence throughout the business, to build an even more resilient organisation capable of driving long-term value and withstanding the challenges that lie ahead. Ivan O’Brien is Consulting Partner and Head of Risk at EY

Amid fierce competition, businesses must harness the cloud’s potential cost reduction. FinOps aligns spending with goals, yet pitfalls in adoption must be sidestepped, advises Liam Cotter Cloud computing continues to revolutionise how businesses innovate and grow in today’s hypercompetitive global environment. While the race to the cloud has catapulted businesses into a new realm of speed and agility, few are cashing in on the cloud’s promise to drive down costs – and the challenges are mounting amid the proliferation of multi-cloud environments. The problem is typically a case of too much spending and too little oversight. Businesses are struggling to effectively manage a critical new resource vastly different from the legacy environment it replaces. There is no question that organisations need a radical new approach to managing their cloud spending. The answer? FinOps. With FinOps (the combination of ‘Finance’ and ‘DevOps’), teams from IT, finance and business units collaborate on data-driven spending decisions. Transparency is prioritised, and everyone takes ownership of their cloud usage. FinOps aligns cloud spending with business objectives and helps cross-functional teams work harmoniously to enhance financial control and predictability, reduce friction, and deliver products and services faster in today’s consumer-centric digital economy. However, there are five critical mistakes organisations make when embracing the power of cloud capabilities. 1. The lack of a clear, strategic vision that aligns KPIs with outcomes Success on the FinOps journey inevitably requires measuring, reporting, analysing and optimising cloud spending. Taking a strategic approach to FinOps means keeping objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) front and centre at all times – continuously revisiting, adjusting and evolving them as required. Businesses should monitor and respond to new business data and make changes, particularly in today’s fast-evolving environment, where the rapid pace of change continues to accelerate. 2. Not understanding costs and trends at a granular level You can’t measure what you can’t see, making a precise, granular view of cloud costs and trends critical to your business. It’s not enough to know your cloud spend at any moment – positioning your business to manage and reduce costs continually is essential. Amid a lack of data that continually delivers timely cloud spend and usage insights, businesses often make significant cloud investments while unsure what they are accomplishing or how to manage costs. Observability is essential to success – gaining visibility into where your cloud spend is going, monitoring activity at a granular level, and responding as needed as workloads and objectives change. This visibility can empower your data teams with precise allocation, real-time budgeting information and accurate forecasting for cost governance. 3. Not using appropriate tools, technologies and tagging FinOps’ success, apart from calculating and gathering timely data, also requires visibility of assets through IT asset management and the use of appropriate tools, technologies and tagging, including automation capabilities. Unfortunately, many businesses with multi-cloud environments use tools and capabilities provided by their cloud vendors with little to no benefit. Improper and inconsistent tagging of resources and a lack of appropriate automation can hinder success. Trend-based forecasting is an appropriate method for simpler situations in which past trends will likely continue. It helps answer questions such as “What would monthly cloud spend be in a future month given the spending trend observed to date?” 4. The lack of collaboration between finance and engineering teams A successful cloud journey relies on FinOps and the engineering team working closely together. While FinOps can manage processes and budgeting, this will likely not prove successful if engineering doesn’t agree to take the right actions. Cross-training of teams and organisational change management to create a highly collaborative approach among diverse teams is critical for FinOps to deliver ongoing value. 5. Not taking action, communicating and optimising Your business may have the necessary metrics, tools and technologies for a successful FinOps journey and be well-positioned to identify problems as they arise. However, a strategic action plan is essential; one that provides appropriate guidelines that bring the required players together to understand the problem and its implications, manage the issue and set the course for a future strategy that can optimise processes and costs. An intelligent approach is to manage by the numbers. These are the components required to help build a governance programme that positions you to do so: Reports and dashboards: Ensure all stakeholders have access to appropriate reporting and dashboards for their role and provide rapid, at-a-glance views into current cost trends and forecasts. Resource hierarchy: Structure cloud resources in a resource hierarchy that is granular enough for management and cost allocation using folders, projects, tags, labels, etc. Budget alerts: Set budget notifications that are triggered automatically when resources or costs ramp up beyond a predetermined threshold to help prevent unexpected activity impacting budgeted spending. Automated actions: Configure automated actions to throttle resources or cap costs to help prevent unwanted activity and overspending. Standard reviews: Establish standard review cadences between IT and finance to review historical spending and develop future action recommendations. FinOps’ success requires bringing engineering and finance stakeholders together to plan, measure, report, analyse and optimise costs. It’s not enough to simply implement new tools, communicate a few expectations and occasionally meet for updates. A holistic operating model should be designed, implemented, orchestrated and evolve as new tools, techniques, ways of working and other factors emerge with time. Liam Cotter is a Management Consulting Partner at KPMG

As back-to-school season approaches, employers can aid parents with flexible work options that foster work-life balance and increased productivity, explains Gemma O’Connor The back-to-school season is nearly underway as kids and parents prepare for the new school year. This can be a busy time for working parents, particularly for parents of children facing a milestone like starting primary or secondary education. So, what can employers do to help staff balance their home and work lives? Communicate with your staff Most employees should be able to predict when they might need extra flexibility to help their children settle into their new surroundings. Different employees will have different requests depending on their child’s level of education. As each employee will have different requirements, there is no silver bullet for managing this situation other than to ensure that you listen to staff and make efforts to accommodate any supports they request. Consider flexible work options If an employee requests flexibility during back-to-school season, consider it and what solution might work best for both parties. Some solutions could include: Working from home on certain days; Early finishes/late starts on certain days; Compressed hours; and Staggered hours. While you have no obligation to grant requests for flexibility, a blunt refusal to accommodate working parents increases the likelihood of alienating employees. Employees who feel let down by their employer are also likely to spread the news of their bad experiences, resulting in reputational damage and hindering your recruitment and retention efforts. Treat people fairly If only working parents are granted flexible work options during the school year, you also risk frustrating employees who don’t receive comparable benefits just because they don’t have children. It’s important to avoid granting privileges to parents only. If you provide benefits to working parents based on promoting work-life balance, you should extend the same flexibility to staff who need to care for an elderly parent or a spouse who’s ill, for instance. If you operate your workplace on the basis that everyone will need flexibility at one time or another, all staff will buy in and the organisation will avoid employee unrest that could develop if only working parents enjoy flexible work options. Prepare for new workers’ statutory rights The Work Life Balance Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023 has been partially in force since 3 July. Once fully in force, this new piece of employment legislation will introduce five statutory rights for employees to foster a better work-life balance and to support staff with caring responsibilities. In summary, the Act introduces the following rights: Five days’ unpaid leave for medical care purposes for parents of children under 12 and carers; Five days’ paid leave for victims of domestic violence; The right to request flexible working for parents and carers; The right to request remote working for all employees; and The right to breastfeeding breaks extended to two years from the date of the child’s birth. Employers should be ready to receive requests from employees in line with this employment law scheduled to come into effect in full this autumn. Find balance Recognising the needs of working parents during the back-to-school period is crucial for fostering a supportive and inclusive work environment. Working parents often encounter added responsibilities as schools reopen, from adjusting schedules to managing childcare. By understanding these challenges and providing flexibility, employers can mitigate stress, enhance employee well-being and maintain productivity. Acknowledging the unique demands of working parents (and extending the same benefits to non-parent employees) promotes a harmonious balance between professional duties and family responsibilities. Gemma O’Connor is Head of Service at Peninsula Ireland

In the digital age, cyber threats redefine business acquisitions. Mark Butler explores four reasons for prioritising cyber security due diligence, ensuring informed decisions and resilience When considering the purchase of a business, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive assessment of potential risks. Technology risks, particularly cyber threats, have become increasingly significant in today’s digital age. Therefore, prioritising cyber security as part of the due diligence process is crucial to gain a complete view of potential risks, allowing you to make informed decisions and plan accordingly. There are four compelling reasons why a cyber security audit should be a priority in the due diligence process when buying a business. 1. Assessing the business’s technology infrastructure The technology infrastructure of a business plays a vital role in its operations. Cyber security due diligence provides valuable insights into the robustness of the existing infrastructure, including networks, systems, software and hardware. By assessing the vulnerabilities and weaknesses within the technology stack, you can better understand the potential risks and associated costs of upgrading or securing the infrastructure post-acquisition. This knowledge allows you to make informed decisions about the integration process and develop a strategic technology roadmap. 2. Safeguarding sensitive data During a business acquisition, you gain access to the target company’s data, including client information, intellectual property, financial records and employee data. Conducting cyber security due diligence allows you to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security measures that protect this sensitive information. Identifying vulnerabilities and potential data breaches early on can help you implement necessary safeguards and protect the integrity and confidentiality of critical data assets. 3. Mitigating financial and legal risks A cyber security breach can have significant financial and legal consequences for a business. By conducting due diligence, you can identify potential risks that may result in financial loss, such as data breaches, regulatory non-compliance or legal liabilities. Understanding these risks beforehand enables you to negotiate appropriate terms in the acquisition agreement, allocate resources for remediation, and potentially even adjust the purchase price to account for any necessary investments in cyber security. 4. Maintaining business continuity and reputation A successful business acquisition hinges on maintaining continuity and preserving the target company’s reputation. A cyber security incident can disrupt operations, damage customer trust and tarnish the brand image, resulting in financial losses and decreased market value. You can identify potential threats and develop a robust incident response plan by conducting cyber security due diligence. This proactive approach ensures that the necessary measures are in place to minimise the impact of any cyber security incidents and protect the business’s continuity and reputation. Cyber security has become an essential aspect of business risk management in today’s interconnected world. When buying a business, prioritising cyber security within the due diligence process allows you to comprehensively assess technology risks, safeguard sensitive data, mitigate financial and legal risks, assess the technology infrastructure, and maintain business continuity and reputation. The due diligence process is a critical time to ensure you fully understand all potential issues, especially technology, allowing you to address risks and, in turn, plan to deal with them proactively. Mark Butler is Managing Partner at HLB Ireland

In today’s entrepreneurial landscape, high-quality professional services, especially in accountancy, are in demand beyond the allure of technology ventures. John Carolan outlines key strategies to build a successful accountancy practice Technology businesses may seem the default entrepreneurial dream, but there is plenty of demand for high-quality professional services firms in today’s market too, especially accountancy. After all, even the tech founders need accountants. Building a thriving accounting firm requires strategic planning, consistent effort and a focus on client satisfaction. All Chartered Accountants know that accounting is about people as much as it is about numbers. If you’re thinking of going out on your own, there are a few key actions to take to build a successful practice. 1. Define your niche and value proposition Like in any marketing process, you must identify underserved areas and gaps in the market. Once you’ve established that, it is crucial to define your niche and develop a unique value proposition. Identify the specific areas of accounting in which you excel and target your marketing efforts towards those areas, allowing you to establish yourself as an expert in the field and making it easier to attract clients who are seeking specialised services. 2. Cultivate strong client relationships The cliché that “people buy from people” is true. Building lasting relationships with your clients is vital for the success of your accounting firm. Happy clients become referral partners and can play a big role in you building a profitable firm. Implement a client-relationship management system to track interactions, preferences and feedback. Clients who trust and value your services are more likely to refer your firm to others, contributing to the growth of your business. Invest time and effort in understanding your clients’ needs and delivering personalised solutions. It’s also vital to schedule regular check-ins with clients to discuss their evolving needs and deal with any issues. Regularly communicate with your clients, provide them with timely updates, and be proactive in addressing their concerns. Building strong client relationships will not only help retain existing clients but also attract new ones through positive word-of-mouth. 3. Embrace technology and automation Technology plays a significant role in the modern accounting landscape. To build an accountancy practice, it is essential to leverage automation tools to streamline your processes, enhance efficiency and deliver higher-quality services. Research and invest in accounting software that suits your firm’s needs and provides automation capabilities that integrate with other systems, such as payroll and invoicing, to improve accuracy and reduce manual errors. Automation can also free up your time, allowing you to focus on more value-added activities such as strategic planning and client advisory services. In addition, train your staff to use the software effectively to maximise its benefits and stay updated with the latest technological advancements in the accounting industry to remain competitive. 4. Develop a strong online presence Having a strong online presence is crucial for any business, including accounting firms. It’s also important to realise your clients are not going to compare you only with their experiences of other accounting firms. They’re going to compare you with their online experiences. A well-designed and user-friendly website serves as a platform to showcase your expertise, share informative content and attract potential clients. Invest in professional web design, ensure your website is mobile-friendly and optimise your website content with relevant keywords to improve search engine rankings. Remember to actively engage in social media platforms and create valuable content, such as blog posts or webinars, to establish yourself as a thought leader in the industry. 5. Invest in continuous learning and professional development To stay ahead in this evolving profession, it is crucial to invest in continuous learning and professional development. Future-proof yourself and your firm by staying up to date on relevant trends. Encourage your staff to pursue relevant certifications, attend industry conferences and seminars, and engage in ongoing training programmes. By staying updated with the latest accounting regulations, industry trends and technologies, your firm can deliver superior services and maintain a competitive edge. It’s also worthwhile to build your own group of trusted advisors of Chartered Accountants. There is a willingness to share best practices and a good chat in professional networks. And the tried and tested market intelligence you gain access to is worth its weight in gold. John Carolan is the founder of Solve Outsource

As businesses contend with rapid transformation introduced by artificial intelligence, learning how to lead and empower your workforce through the uncharted terrain of technological disruption is critical, says Patrick Gallen The world around us is changing at a pace that appears to be exponential at the very least. The inception of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) learning systems such as Open AI’s ChatGPT has allowed the technology to take centre stage on the world podium, not entirely for the right reasons. While presenting itself with a wealth of benefits, such as instant data and content generation, many fear that the uncharted growth of AI may pose risks to our way of living. Irrespective of views, however, one thing remains clear: the age of AI has begun, and it has already made its mark on the corporate workforce. ­ The advent of such technologies has already begun to disrupt businesses across all areas, from day-to-day internal operations to automating tasks that once took hours of calculation. As companies start to tread through these exciting times, their employees must be guided effectively through the change process. Support holistic learning In a recent podcast, Michelle Weise, author of Long Life Learning: Preparing for jobs that don’t even exist yet, outlined the main topics that prepare companies and their employees for industry changes that are or are yet to come to the fore. First, it is argued that firms should create a learning ecosystem that supports employees as holistic learners with a diverse education history, allowing them to better adapt to prospective change. Leaders must act as role models for their employees, allowing them to raise alternative viewpoints or spark debate before concluding a decision. Sharing views across all levels and offering constructive feedback can bridge knowledge gaps and strengthen employee rapport. Leaders should also use these opportunities with their employees to seek upward feedback, allowing them to identify how they can assist their workforce more effectively. Don’t fear AI Weise also outlines that firms should teach their employees to be “dangerous” enough to exploit emerging technologies to avoid falling behind. Take Nokia and Blackberry, two hallmark examples of companies that failed to adapt to change in time. With the emergence of advanced AI learning systems, companies and employees should challenge the technology, not fear it. Educating employees about the purpose of AI and its benefits will be vital to ensure a common ground between leader and employee. Workshops, seminars and upskilling will be critical to the change process. Understand your employees’ skillsets In addition, Weise discusses the importance of understanding your employees’ skills at a granular level. The abrupt introduction of ChatGPT has shifted the corporate mindset from “what we already know” to “what we need to know”. By gaining a deeper understanding of your employees’ competencies, firms can identify those more competent in tech and AI, allowing them to assist individuals who may struggle with the change process more than others. Firms should encourage their knowledgeable employees to take on a trainer’s role, allowing them to share their skillsets and competencies with other employees. Facilitating and promoting internal training with employees can create a continuous learning and development culture, further catalysing the change process.    With the rapid development of AI in the last several months, the corporate workforce has been turned on its head. The very way in which we work was transformed overnight, prompting urgent change at a global scale. Leading your workforce in a way that promotes understanding, cohesion and growth will help firms adapt to the uncertain world of AI and what lies ahead. Patrick Gallen is Partner of People and Change at Grant Thornton

Julia Rowan answers your management, leadership and team development questions I am an experienced manager who is comfortable with delegating work and trusting my team to get on with it. This allows me to keep a strategic focus. I moved to a new organisation recently and find that my manager and other senior leaders expect me to have detailed knowledge of the work of my direct reports. I do not want to get sucked into operational detail. How do I stay high level while keeping my seniors happy? I always put options on a continuum of ‘do nothing’ (i.e. comply) to ‘the nuclear option’ (i.e. leave), and then identify the options in between.  Before you begin, reflect carefully on what is important for you so that you can shape a clear and positive message. Watch the language – are you ‘getting sucked into the operational detail’ or ‘on top of the data’? My guess is that this is a cultural issue, and if you want to effect change, you need to remain credible. Reflect on what the seniors need: do they need you to have information at your fingertips to save them time? To make important decisions? Are there trust issues around work done by more junior people? Is there something else?  Working this out will help you to meet seniors where they are (not where they ‘should’ be). Ask your manager for their support in meeting expectations while contributing at a higher level (focus on both/and rather than either/or). Bring the same question to your team and get their input and solutions. Reflect on your own expectations – you may need to give a little.  Identify the colleague who navigates this most effectively – ask them how they do it. Build the profile of your team: bring them to meetings. Find a reason to host an event at which your team members share their insights, demonstrate their capabilities and build relationships with your seniors. There may be practical solutions. Could you contact seniors before meetings to check if there are issues they want to discuss? Maybe you could create a shared folder where updated information is posted (either so that you can access it quickly – or colleagues can access it). There are a few options in between. There are many more. Just be open to looking for them. Two colleagues who don’t get on keep trying to drag me into their issues. I feel caught in the middle. In such cases, tapping into our sincerity often gives us the clarity and courage to address tough issues. My guess is that you want to support both without siding with either. Imagine one of your colleagues is sitting in front of you. What would you most like to say? It might be “I am uncomfortable as I feel stuck in the middle” or “That sounds difficult. How can I help you to address this with him?” or “It can be hard to work with someone whose style is so different”.  Try it and see what comes out. Then whittle that down to a sincere and helpful response. Julia Rowan is Principal Consultant at Performance Matters Ltd, a leadership and  team development consultancy. To send a question to Julia, email julia@performancematters.ie.

Audit committees face increasingly complex risks in modern business, according to the latest KPMG survey. Arlene Harris speaks to Niall Savage about the four main risks and how committees can mitigate them KMPG recently published the results of its Global Audit Committee (AC) Institute survey, which collates the views of 768 AC members and chairs, of which 31 were operating in Ireland.  Niall Savage, Partner and Head of Audit Markets at KPMG, says the survey results indicate that, while it may seem at odds with its traditional role, the AC and its members continue to have a “bellwether role for the business as they scan the risk horizon”.  Consequently, ongoing geopolitical issues, cyber threats, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and considerations around environmental, social, and governance (ESG) will remain top of the AC agenda in the coming months. “The traditional and essential role of an AC is overseeing the numbers, controls and, as its title suggests, the audit process – both internal and external,” he says. “So its priority is more in the monitoring than the advising. This work is critical for ensuring financial transparency, confidence and compliance but does not encompass the broader aspects of business. “However, given the typical composition of the AC, the external non-executives with wide-ranging experience, the effective AC Chairperson draws upon the insights of their members to identify and advise on risk areas and strategies to address them.  “The findings suggest that the things driving the agenda of the AC are big-picture risks that underpin their organisations’ strategies. And four key themes – geopolitical, cyber, AI and ESG – were identified as foremost in the minds of AC members.” Indeed, these four themes don’t come without challenges, but there are ways in which ACs can navigate them in their role, supporting the board and management. The effects of risk on the market “Volatility by its nature creates uncertainty in the market, making it difficult for businesses and their stakeholders to make strategic operational and investment decisions,” says Savage. “For example, consumer sentiment in uncertain times can fall rapidly, with non-essential purchases frequently deferred, impacting large parts of the consumer market and leisure industries. “Geopolitical volatility can also undermine investor confidence, cutting off access to finance and creating barriers for businesses through restricted access to markets, currency fluctuations and shifts in trade policies. There is also a heightened risk of supply chain disruption.” In the last 12 months, ACs have been faced with:  post-lockdown uncertainty, which is driving cashflow forecasts (and risks) of how to meet consumer demands; geopolitical conflicts, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, necessitating a rapid response to secure the safety of people and assess the impact on the business in addition to instability in Latin America and the Middle East; rapid and often unexpected inflation across energy, wheat and other commodities, which created unforeseen risks of business failure if these could not be passed on easily; increased interest rate rises and global financial market fluctuations in response to inflation, which changed base case forecasts for investment decisions, funding, and potentially going concerns; ongoing global trade tensions, including those between the US and China, with increasing tariffs, which had ripple effects on global supply chains; and the fallout from COVID and Brexit, which continued to affect the global economy. Geopolitical risks “It is difficult to predict what the next 12 months have in store, but some key actions for AC members to manage these risks include engaging with management and stakeholders to understand their assessment of geopolitical risks and existing strategies to mitigate those risks, and asking management to provide timely updates on geopolitical developments and the organisation’s risk mitigation efforts,” said Savage.   “Also, understanding the geopolitical risks that can impact the organisation and monitoring global political developments, regional tensions, trade disputes, regulatory changes and other geopolitical factors that may have implications for the organisation. “And, staying informed about current events and diplomatic developments that can impact the organisation’s operations – along with knowing if the organisation is especially exposed to certain regions or risks, should the AC consider recruitment or training to ensure that they have the expertise to address any challenges they face, is also important.” Savage also suggests assessing an organisation’s exposure to geopolitical risks, understanding management’s approach to contingency planning, and understanding the full list of regulatory compliance requirements and whether the organisation has processes in place to identify, monitor and adhere to applicable regulations.  ACs must also consider with management the need for scenario planning to model impact and respond to geopolitical events. Cyber risks Advances in modern technology have also brought about a growing number of cyber threats, and in the past 12 months, many Irish businesses and organisations have reported data leaks and thefts as cybercriminals become more sophisticated and professional in their approach to both getting access to systems through ransomware and social engineering but also monetising this access.  As firms try to protect themselves from this, the list of targets and potential weaknesses continues to grow with the proliferation of the internet of things (IoT), which may not have the same level of security and is, therefore, easier to compromise. “For those engaged in public work, there is an additional political dimension and risk to cybercrime with nation state targeting for political gain, which has seen recent coverage of European Commission staff removing certain apps from their phone restrictions on Telco suppliers due to concerns over security,” says Savage. “But there are some essential actions that ACs can take, which include understanding the cyber risk landscape, the type of threats it faces, potential vulnerabilities and the impact of a cyber incident.  “They can also evaluate the organisation’s cybersecurity governance and strategy while focusing on risk assessment, incident response, training and vendor competence. It is important to be informed – stay on top of cybersecurity initiatives and maintain open lines of communication to address any concerns or gaps identified.” He would also encourage organisations to consider engaging external cybersecurity experts or conducting independent audits/penetration testing to assess the effectiveness of these controls, to ensure the AC is informed of cybersecurity incidents and evaluate the organisation’s response and promote cybersecurity awareness through training and incident reporting and ensure that appropriate cybersecurity risk reporting mechanisms are in place. AI risks The advent of AI has brought a new set of risks to business. “Although long discussed and the subject of many films (Terminator 2 springs to mind), the potential impact of AI really hit home late last year with the launch of ChatGPT, which was quickly followed with spectacular claims of cost savings, entire professions wiped out and of course the danger of ‘the rise of the machines’,” says Savage. “Clearly, there are significant risks and opportunities for businesses and ACs to deal with, many of which are ‘unknown unknowns’ to combat this and assess risk.” In the face of this new business landscape, “ACs should understand the concerns and opportunities for people, customers, suppliers and regulators. They should try to understand how best to get the right level of knowledge, evaluate the existing risk management framework to assess whether additional controls are needed, consider policies around the implementation and use of AI and review critical AI implementation projects.” ESG risks The final issue Savage addresses is ESG, which he says has been an “alphabet soup of regulation” for the past few years – and KPMG research indicates compliance with standards is only one of the ESG risks occupying the minds of AC members.  “There is a broader menu of risks to consider, which impact reputation, performance and financial success,” he says. “Failure to address these can lead to reputational damage and financial implications. So, AC members should consider the potential reputational risks associated with the company’s ESG performance and how they are managed. Climate change risks can impact the value of assets, and non-compliance can result in fines or penalties.”  To address these risks, it is important for ACs to understand and work closely with all stakeholders including management and internal auditors. Areas of focus should: ensure the AC has the necessary expertise to effectively assess ESG risks – this may involve recruiting or training existing committee members; engage with investors, regulatory bodies and industry associations to understand their expectations and perspectives on ESG; develop a list and understanding of ESG risks relevant to the company across climate change, labour, data and inclusion and diversity; review how data is currently captured and analysed and how reporting is verified; look at the existing risk management practices and policies and assess the key controls and how the risks are currently monitored and reported; benchmark these to peer groups and industry standards to ascertain whether they align with recognised frameworks; and seek regular updates on ESG initiatives and consider external assurance on related reporting.  “There are more insights to the survey, and it is interesting to benchmark different priorities across the regions, priorities around finance team talent, the need for in-person time with management and a focusing agenda to maximise effectiveness,” says Savage. “However, by elaborating on and identifying some common-sense actions on the four critical themes – geopolitical, cyber, AI and ESG – we have supported AC members for the next, hopefully, less volatile, 12 months.”  

The NATO summit was not only about Ukraine. It was about the role of the past and how it affects NATO and the EU, writes Judy Dempsey By the time you read this, we’ll have all moved on from the NATO summit that took place in the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius in July towards other persistent topics.  There’s Ireland’s housing crisis; the worry that Donald Trump might beat President Joe Biden in the 2024 election for the White House; and Russia’s continuing war against Ukraine, to name a few. The list is long. But a common threat runs through these issues: the enduring role of the past and how societies in the 21st century have to deal with it. The past is a compass. It offers the way to the future if there is a political willingness to deal with history. The past can also be distorted.  That sense of the past was clear when attending the NATO summit.  The summit’s conclusions fell short – for some, way too short – by failing to offer Ukraine membership of the US-led military alliance once the war was over.  Lithuania and the other two Baltic States, Estonia and Latvia, but also Poland and the Czech Republic, were disappointed. They believed that Biden and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who led the opposition against a membership date, did not have the political courage or historical compass to offer Ukraine at least a timetable.  The bottom line is that, for different reasons, this decision was about Russia.  Biden, who is facing re-election and simmering unpopularity with American support for Ukraine, does not want to drag NATO into a direct confrontation with Russia. Germany thinks the same but is not committed to admitting Ukraine to NATO. Yet, this war has given Germany a big chance to lead Europe and create a strong NATO caucus inside the alliance. Germany demurred.  This brings us to Lithuania.  It has been a staunch ally of the Belarussian opposition and an unremitting supporter of Ukraine. For Lithuania, it is about Kyiv defeating Russia. But it is more than that. Lithuania and the other Baltic States see the war in Ukraine through the prism of Russia but in a special way, distinct from Western Europe.  For Lithuania, this is about Russia trying to regain control over the countries of Eastern Europe, which include not only Ukraine but also Belarus, Moldova, Georgia and Armenia.  Lithuania also sees Russia aiming to create a new cordon sanitaire between the EU/NATO countries and Eastern Europe – a kind of updated version of the Cold War divisions of Europe.  In the view of the Central Europeans, Russia’s imperial ambitions must be stopped. Eastern Europe must not be turned into a grey Russian-controlled zone. The prospects for instability would be too high and dangerous. Germany and the United States, for their part, see the war in Ukraine through the prism of Russia as a nuclear power and threat – as if Russia is not already threatening the security of Europe. They do not see it in terms of the past but in terms of realpolitik. For Central Europe, the past is the legacy of the violent Soviet occupation of the region that must not be repeated in Ukraine.  The past for Western Europe is how, with huge American support, today’s EU was built. It was a peace project constructed upon the ruins of World War Two. This peace project is now being challenged by Russia. The war in Ukraine is about two different European narratives. It is time to reconcile them.  Judy Dempsey is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Carnegie Europe and Editor-in-Chief of Strategic Europe  

As we approach the final months of 2023, three Chartered Accountants take a moment to contemplate the hurdles Ireland has surmounted and share their aspirations for the remainder of the year Sinéad Nolan Financial Accountant AXA Insurance The economy is fine on paper (GDP and domestically); however, housing is a major issue, in both affordability and availability. The cost-of-living crisis is only exacerbating a problem that was already there for young professionals starting off their careers. Paying rent is a continuous challenge, as is looking for an affordable house to purchase. The interest rates keep rising, and house prices don’t seem to be reducing. Many in the country felt the challenge of paying bills in the wintertime. On top of that, there has been a lot of uncertainty with the war in Ukraine.  On the plus side, there has recently been slight moderation in the price of energy and in inflation, and the pleasant weather in June was a bonus! (Less pleasant in July, admittedly.) Also, the unemployment rate in the Republic of Ireland fell to a record low of 3.8 percent in May. To help, my employer has hosted many financial wellness webinars, which, given the current economic crisis, have been great.  We also received a well-being day off, not to mention personal interaction is happening in the office again – we are attending social events, which is brilliant.  As for the rest of the year, I hope the housing crisis settles, and there is more support given to first-time house buyers from the Government. I joined the Young Professionals Committee in July after attending the wonderful Pride BBQ in June. I am looking forward to organising and hosting events, and connecting with other members of the Institute. The Young Professionals Committee is a great networking platform, so I am very excited to get stuck in with it. Jim Stafford Consultant Friel Stafford I work every day at the coalface, advising companies and individuals who are dealing with financial challenges, and thus I appreciate the issues facing the economy.  While there is an economic brew of uncertainty caused by inflation, geopolitical issues, etc., the biggest impact we have seen this year has been the dramatic increase in interest rates, which has shaken some people to the core.  We have observed a noticeable increase in Members Voluntary Liquidations from businesspeople who are deciding to ‘cash in their chips’ now rather than face future uncertainty.   One of the positives that I have always enjoyed when working with people under financial pressure is recognising the levels of resilience people have. On the ‘resilience spectrum’, I am delighted to see some clients who bounce back stronger than ever.   The highlight for me personally this year was the sale of Friel Stafford to Ifac, which will enable us to provide restructuring services such as the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP) across Ifac’s 30+ offices.  The association with Ifac has moved us into the top ten accountancy firms in Ireland, which has opened the doors to certain types of work, making it easier for us to attract and retain talent.  A big development during the year was the growth of artificial intelligence (AI). While there is great potential for generative AI to change the workplace, there is also huge scope for more sophisticated fraud.  Looking to the year ahead, a big challenge for some businesses will be the ending of the Revenue warehousing scheme, which was a valuable lifeline for many.  We expect to see an increased number of SCARPs next year.  Another big challenge for some firms will be the Companies Registration Office and the Corporate Enforcement Authority increasing their enforcement activity on companies that are struck off. Gordon Naughton  Chief Executive Officer Tactive   January represented a strange and uncertain time for the Irish and global economy. Many initiatives were placed on hiatus due to significant inflationary, economic and geopolitical concerns.  In January, it was startling to see how quickly the mood had shifted from November and December. Since then, the business community and consumers have learned to live with these concerns and are in a positive state of mind.  Currently, the Irish economy is showing tremendous resilience, with the overall tax intake and consumer spending being unexpectedly high. It seems the country is forging ahead. However, if the past three years are a barometer for future challenges, predicted and day-to-day issues tend to be easy to deal with. It’s the unpredicted challenges that can pose the most difficulty.  My key lesson from this period is that businesses need to be agile, efficient and have contingency plans for the three main ways an economy can move – up, down or steady on.  Luckily, I have great clients, a good support structure and network that has brought me through any uncertainty. I am so lucky to work from home and spend time with my wonderful family.  Continuous learning is a facet of my life, as I simply like reading and expanding my knowledge. This year I obtained a black belt in Lean, which has helped me professionally and personally.  As for the rest of 2023, I hope to continue to work with outstanding clients.   

In today’s rapidly changing world, organisations are embracing inclusive leadership. Karin Lanigan explores what it means, why it matters, and the essential traits of effective inclusive leaders As a result of recent seismic and lasting changes in the workplace, many organisations are now adopting an inclusive approach to leadership. What is inclusive leadership, and why does it matter? A complex and diverse world We are operating in an increasingly complex world that is constantly evolving. The pace and enormity of the changes taking place require a different approach to leadership: inclusive leadership. A new leadership style is required To be an effective leader now requires a move away from a traditional style of leadership to an inclusive leadership approach. This doesn’t mean that the conventional aspects of leadership are defunct. In fact, the core fundamentals of leadership still apply. However, moving to inclusive leadership involves a change from an autocratic, top-down, centralised leadership approach to a more decentralised, democratic, shared and participative process involving employees across all levels of the organisation. Traits of an inclusive leader An inclusive leader is aware of their own biases and proactively seeks out, encourages and considers different perspectives to facilitate better decision making and more effective collaboration. They strive to ensure that colleagues are treated equally, feel a sense of belonging and value, and work in a psychologically safe space where they can contribute and are supported to achieve their full potential. There is no doubt that inclusive leadership is now a critical capability. The core skills and competencies that are typically exhibited by inclusive leaders include: Self-awareness. Inclusive leaders have a strong awareness of their own biases and blind spots. Similarly, a high level of emotional intelligence enabling the effective management of emotions, their own and those of others, is fundamental.  Empathy. Being an inclusive leader requires having both the willingness and capacity to comprehend and acknowledge the emotions and viewpoints of others. Cultural intelligence. Inclusive leaders aim to establish a workplace that welcomes and values all cultures, allowing everyone to make meaningful contributions. This requires a sense of curiosity and a willingness to learn about different cultures and their traditions. Communication. Clear and effective communication supports an inclusive leadership style. Inclusive leaders look to understand and adapt their communication style to be understood by a diverse audience.  Collaboration. Inclusive leaders foster an environment that is psychologically safe, enabling every member to contribute their ideas and innovations to achieve better outcomes. Commitment and courage. Inclusive leaders are role models, challenge the status quo, and advocate for others.   Why does inclusive leadership matter? Much research has been conducted to assess the benefits of inclusive leadership. The results point to increased staff engagement, attraction and retention; improved workplace relations, communication and collaboration; enhanced transparency resulting in higher levels of trust; better decision-making and problem-solving arising from more varied insights and contributions; and increased innovation and creativity by bringing diverse skills and perspectives together. Ultimately, inclusive leaders significantly enhance employee engagement, performance and overall business results. There is no doubt that inclusive leadership is now a critical and unique capability and one that can support career progression and the achievement of personal and corporate potential.  Karin Lanigan is Head of Member Experience at Chartered Accountants Ireland

The Digital Services Act aims to better protect users in the online world, but its requirements will impose many new obligations on service providers, say Mary Loughney, Shane O’Neill and Filipa Sequeira The increased use of digital technology dramatically raises the chances of end users being exposed to illegal or harmful online content. Regulations and laws are catching up with the fast-paced world of emerging digital services and online platforms to ensure online services’ security, accountability and openness.  The Digital Services Act (DSA), an EU regulation, aims to modernise the digital landscape and defend users’ rights. What digital services does the DSA cover? The DSA encompasses a broad range of online intermediaries, including internet service providers, cloud services, messaging platforms, marketplaces and social networks.  Hosting services, such as online platforms (a hosting service provider that “stores and disseminates to the public information, unless that activity is a minor or purely secondary feature of another service”), social networks, content-sharing platforms, online marketplaces and travel/accommodation platforms, have specific due diligence obligations.  The DSA’s most significant regulations target very large online platforms, with a substantial societal and economic impact reaching a minimum of 45 million EU users, representing 10 percent of the population.  Similarly, very large online search engines with over 10 percent of the EU’s 450 million consumers will have greater responsibility for combating illegal content on the internet. Key provisions of the DSA The DSA outlines specific responsibilities for online platforms, including big platforms, intermediaries and hosting service providers.  Due to their significant societal impact, the Act introduces categories called Very Large Online Platforms (VLOP) and Very Large Online Search Engines (VLOSE), which are subject to stricter regulations and audit requirements.  An independent audit must cover all the obligations imposed on VLOPs and VLOSEs by the DSA, including the duties to remove illegal content, provide users with transparency about how their data is used and prevent the spread of disinformation.  The following focus areas are central to the DSA’s requirements: Due diligence around safety and content moderation: The DSA lays out guidelines to address illegal content, such as hate speech, terrorist propaganda and fake goods. Online platforms must set up efficient content moderation systems and offer ways for users to report unlawful content. This may involve using automated tools for detection and removal. User rights and transparency about terms of service, consent, algorithms and advertising practices: Companies must offer more transparency about how their platforms operate, including their terms of service, algorithms and advertising practices. This will help users to understand how their data is being used. Users’ ability to control their privacy settings and flag harmful content: Companies must provide users with tools to manage their privacy settings and flag harmful content. This will help users to protect their personal data and keep themselves safe online. Companies are also required to respond to flagged content within a reasonable timeframe. Measures to prevent the spread of disinformation: Companies must take steps to prevent the spread of disinformation, such as by labelling sponsored content and providing users with access to reliable information. This may involve working with fact-checking organisations or other companies to share information about disinformation. Accountability for the content hosted on platforms: Companies must be accountable for the content hosted on their platforms. This means they must be able to remove illegal content promptly and co-operate with law enforcement authorities. With these provisions in mind, a sensible place to begin your journey may involve conducting a maturity assessment using a risk-based approach so the organisation is aware of the risks that require mitigation: Maturity assessment: The risk assessment should consider a range of factors, such as the nature of the platform, the type of content hosted and the potential for harm to users. Address DSA requirement gaps: As a result of the risk assessment, organisations should identify their exposed risks and implement necessary measures, which include enhancing content moderation tooling, increasing transparency and enabling more robust end-user control mechanisms. Compliance reporting: Organisations would be required to comply with third-party external audits. While that audit would evaluate the platform’s systems and processes, compliance reporting may also include information on overall risk mitigation efforts. The challenging aspects of the DSA’s audit requirements To ensure compliance with the DSA’s provisions, digital service providers, predominantly VLOPs and VLOSEs, will be subject to independent audits. The audit must be conducted in accordance with the methodology and templates established in the delegated regulation, and the audit should review whether the VLOP or VLOSE: has a clear and transparent policy on how it addresses illegal content; has a system in place for detecting and removing illegal content and preventing the spread of disinformation; and provides users with adequate transparency about how their data is used. The audits will evaluate the platform’s efforts to deal with illegal content, the openness of content moderation procedures, adherence to DSA requirements, and the efficiency of user reporting mechanisms. The platform’s practices for data security and privacy will also be examined.  It will be challenging for online intermediaries to comply with some DSA requirements.  Accurate classification of digital services The DSA distinguishes between different types of digital services, such as intermediaries, hosting services and online platforms. Assigning the correct classification to a specific service can be complex, especially for hybrid platforms with multiple functionalities. Accurately defining the obligations and responsibilities associated with each classification requires careful analysis. Removing illegal content in a timely manner The DSA requires the removal of unlawful content in a timely manner after being made aware of its existence. Implementing effective content moderation mechanisms while respecting freedom of expression and avoiding over-removal or under-removal of content is a complex task. Developing sophisticated algorithms and human review processes to strike the right balance poses significant technical and operational challenges.  Further transparency about how content is moderated  The DSA requires more transparency about how online intermediaries moderate content. This includes providing information about the criteria used to moderate content, the processes used to make decisions and the appeals process available to users who flag moderation issues.  It can be difficult to require online intermediaries to disclose sensitive information about their internal operations. Additional steps to protect users’ privacy rights  The DSA requires additional steps to protect users’ privacy and enhance users’ rights. This includes transparency, user control over content and redress mechanisms.  These new provisions can be challenging to implement as they require online intermediaries to change their business practices significantly.  Implementing user-friendly interfaces and operative-complaint resolution mechanisms to ensure seamless user experiences can be technically complex and resource intensive. Compliance with new rules on targeted advertising  The DSA introduces new rules on targeted advertising. These rules prohibit online intermediaries from using sensitive personal data to target users with ads, and they require online intermediaries to give users more control over the ads they see.  Co-operation with authorities The DSA emphasises co-operation between platforms and regulatory authorities.  Ensuring information sharing, responding to legitimate requests and establishing effective communication channels with various national authorities across the EU pose many challenges. Maintaining confidentiality and data protection while complying with these requirements can be tricky. Interpretation of the DSA The interpretation of the DSA may evolve as it undergoes the legislative process. As such, there are themes associated with how one might expect an audit will be conducted: Transparency: The audits must be conducted transparently. Accountability: The audits are designed to ensure that VLOPs and VLOSEs are accountable for compliance with the DSA. Effectiveness: The audits must effectively identify and address any compliance gaps. Proportionality: The audits must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the VLOPS and VLOSEs. Flexibility: The delegated regulation allows auditors to adapt the audit methodology to the specific circumstances of the VLOP or the VLOSE. These are just some specific requirements that are tricky and complicated to implement. However, the DSA is essential to creating a safer and more accountable online environment. Best practice The table above displays exemplary and tactical actions that could be considered when enhancing users’ privacy rights and transparency about terms of service, consent, algorithms and advertising practices. In addition to these specific steps, companies should consider implementing several general best practices: A well-defined risk management framework: Establishing ongoing risk assessment activities will help companies identify and mitigate user risks. A culture of compliance: This will help ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the DSA requirements and committed to complying with them. A robust process for responding to incidents: This will help companies to respond quickly and effectively to any incidents that may arise. An oversight process for monitoring and reporting on compliance: This will help companies track their progress and identify areas where they may need to improve. A trustworthy online environment The DSA represents a significant step toward regulating online platforms and digital services within the EU. By introducing audit requirements, the DSA enhances transparency, accountability and user protection in the digital world. Independent audits will serve as a mechanism to ensure compliance with the DSA’s provisions, thereby fostering a safer, fairer and more trustworthy online environment. Mary Loughney is Director and Head of Technology Risk Consulting at Grant Thornton  Shane O’Neill is Partner and Head  of Technical Change, Financial Services Advisory at Grant Thornton  Filipa Sequeira is Senior Consultant of Financial Services Advisory at Grant Thornton

Maria McHugh shares how she set boundaries, shed the notion that she “can do it all”, and that achieving a successful career while prioritising family is possible with the right mindset and support Growing up, I had a keen interest in business and enterprise. Because of this, I completed a BSc in Finance at University College Cork, and, after considering career options, I felt that becoming a Chartered Accountant was the best fit for me and a good start to my business career.  This, however, wasn’t without its challenges. Coming back after a break Like many women, I had to make a decision about having children and consider how my career would be impacted.  Between 2014 and 2021, my husband and I had three children, and during that time, we decided that I would be a full-time stay-at-home mum because of a lack of childcare availability.  This unplanned, seven-year break in my career had a much bigger impact on me mentally than I ever would have thought. I felt that I had lost my professional self. I didn’t realise how important that identity was to me.  I watched as my peers’ careers progressed and felt left behind.  After seven years at home, I started to consider what returning to work would look like; frankly, it was terrifying.  I suffered from post-natal depression after my second baby, and it left me with low confidence and self-belief. Thankfully, earlier in my career, I met Karin Lanigan in Member Services at Chartered Accountants Ireland, and I always remembered her openness and honesty.  Personal priorities While I wanted my career back on track, it was also important that I continue to be available for my children. I lost my mum at 13 years old, so it has always been especially important to me to be at home for my children. I had to consider what type of professional role I wanted and how to balance my work and home life.  I felt passionate about helping start-ups, sole traders and being involved in local enterprises. Having completed the Chartered Accountants Ireland Diploma in Tax in 2018, opening my accountancy and tax practice seemed the best fit for me and the family.  I was excited by the prospect, but I was also incredibly overwhelmed, daunted, and the self-doubt and fear were crippling.  I had three small children, was moving from Dublin back to my native Dungarvan, and was now opening my own practice. It seemed insurmountable. Karin guided me in breaking the tasks into manageable steps and helped me see that this was achievable. Professional Standards and Practice Consulting were also very supportive, and I was delighted that so much support was offered by Chartered Accountants Ireland.  While on my journey back into the workplace, I was really heartened by all the supports that were available through the Institute, and I hope these only grow and extend to more women.  In some ways, I think women put themselves under too much pressure with the social narrative that “we can do it all”. I think we are our own worst critics, and we can each have an expectation for ourselves that we should be doing everything, and when we don’t, we think we are failing.   This perception is false and needs to change. It is OK to choose to stay at home with young children, and that  decision should not feel detrimental to our career or be something we need to explain or justify.  For me, it is all about balance, and this is personal to every family. We are all just doing our best to have a career in whatever way possible to suit our family life.  Setting boundaries Since I started my business, I have always had the mindset that I am going at my own pace.  The aim of having my own practice was that I could balance both my career and my family life but I recognised early on that working in my practice full time was just not going to work for my family. As a result, I learned how to say no. I created boundaries around my work schedule, especially during school holidays, and I don’t apologise  for it.  I sometimes think that women feel they need to be singularly career-orientated and driven to succeed to be taken seriously or that admitting the kids come first is a weakness. I don’t agree at all.  At the start of the summer, I announced on social media that I was taking a step back from work for the school summer holidays. The support from peers and clients was fantastic. People told me that my being upfront about the summer break was refreshing and inspired other parents to do the same.  It’s like anything – if you don’t see it being done, you don’t realise you can do it. This doesn’t mean that I am not career-driven or don’t have aspirations for my own business. But this is a marathon, not a sprint, and I will do it in my own time. Building your tribe Networking is vital to sole practitioners for promoting themselves and, more importantly, building solid support. When I started my practice, I had no colleagues to bounce ideas off or to ask questions. I feel strongly that this kind of support is important for my personal development, so I reached out to a fellow mum in practice from my PwC days and asked how she would feel about coming together to set up a small group.  We now have a core group of four accountants (also mums) in practice. We support each other, answer technical questions and get opinions on issues we come across. This group has been vital to growing my confidence and has shown me that there are others also dealing with the same problems. In my experience, the most important qualities for women in business are self-belief and self-confidence.  I am a great champion of women and our abilities but I have struggled with self-confidence in the last few years. When left unchecked, this self-doubt can be very limiting.  I would love to see the topic of low self-confidence as ways to manage it spoken about more. My self-confidence has grown over time, but it is something I work on and still struggle with to this day.  The more it is discussed, the more women will realise, like me, that they are not alone in this mental battle.  I am also very lucky to be a member of the 2023 Chamber of the Year, Dungarvan and West Waterford Chamber. Through this membership I have found another group of like-minded women on their own business journey. We support each other, attend events together and help each other when we can.  Finding your tribe in business is so important and having that sense of community and support from different groups has had a positive impact on my own business and personal development. Maria McHugh is Founder Owner of McHugh Accounting and Consultancy

Recent European heatwaves have highlighted the impact climate change has on society and the economy. Susan Rossney explores the challenges facing Irish businesses when taking steps to tackle the crisis Recent severe heatwaves in continental Europe have shown how the effects of global warming are coming ever closer to home. Forced migration, drought, forest fires and biodiversity loss are some of the many ways climate change will impact Irish society.  Its impact on the economy will be acute, affecting everything from the health and wellness of employees to the cost of raw materials, scarcity of resources and supply chain disruption.  Ireland and climate change Climate change poses risks to humans, nature and Ireland as a nation.  Ireland is legally bound to meet ambitious national and international climate targets. According to the Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC), an independent advisory body, Ireland will not meet the climate targets it has set for itself in the first and second carbon budget periods. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) provisional estimates on 2022 greenhouse gas emissions show that Ireland already used 47 percent of the carbon budget for 2021–2025 in the past two years.  An annual reduction of 12.4 percent is now required for each of the remaining years if Ireland is to stay within budget.  However, as emissions fell only 1.9 percent in 2022, this has been described as “extremely challenging” by the EPA.  It is clear that action is required across all sectors of the economy and society, including: Mitigation: reducing activity that causes climate change, like burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas); and Adaptation: making changes to deal with the effects of climate change, from operational changes to cope with rising summer temperatures or winter flooding to factoring in the risk of developing stranded assets and increased carbon tax liabilities. Ireland’s perception of climate change According to Climate Change in the Irish Mind, EPA research conducted in 2021, most Irish citizens share a desire for action on the climate crisis.  However, other EPA research has found that our emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) continue to rise.  Environmental Indicators Ireland 2022, published by the Central Statistics Office (CSO), shows that Ireland’s 2022 emissions were 11 percent higher than in 1990.  Enterprises contributed an estimated 12.7 percent to Ireland’s overall emissions in 2018, according to the Climate Action Plan 2023. Although this is less than the contributions of other sectors, there remains a need for Ireland’s enterprises to take action to reduce their emissions.  However, a 2022 national survey of 380 SMEs and larger enterprises across industry and service sectors by Microsoft and University College Cork found that Irish businesses are underprepared to make the necessary changes to transition to a net zero future. According to the study, 86 percent have no commitments or targets to decarbonise.  Barriers to action  In the face of evidence of climate change – and Ireland’s willingness to take action – what is preventing Irish businesses from responding to the crisis?  As an issue, climate change is complicated, abstract and overwhelming. Multiple interdependent factors cause it, and it is nearly impossible to avoid contributing to it in our daily lives. Buying products, driving a car or taking a flight for a foreign family holiday (full disclosure: I’m just back from one) all add to the overall problem. The solutions to the climate crisis are also interdependent and complicated. The positive changes we can make as individuals can feel insignificant, especially compared with large countries’ continued pollution.  The European Commission’s Annual Report on European SMEs 2021/22 – SMEs and environmental sustainability identified access to finance, limited expertise and skills, and regulatory and administrative barriers among the challenges facing SMEs in particular. Businesses that want to take climate action often have limited time, cash flow, resources and support (both financial and non-financial) to take action.  Knowledge is also a barrier. Many professionals qualified at a time when climate change was not identified as a business risk. They now find themselves having to skill up mid-career in an area that is famous for changing frequently.  Finally, many citizens and businesses are still struggling with crises related to COVID-19, inflationary pressure, supply chain disruption and high energy costs. Staying afloat is a crisis in itself.  Firms, particularly SMEs, focusing on the practicalities of running a business, paying staff and grappling with cash flow and costs are more likely to see climate action as the responsibility of governments or, at the very least, large corporations rather than them.  On top of that, climate discussions are often politicised. They are regularly reduced to a ‘them vs us’ polarised debate in mainstream media rather than discussing how everyone can work together to deliver solutions.  Threats and opportunities  For businesses, climate change presents both threats and opportunities.  Threats The threats have been categorised as physical risks (both ‘acute’ and ‘chronic’) and transitional risks.  Opportunities  Taking action on the climate crisis enables businesses to restore lost ecosystems, improve air quality, community health and well-being, and avail of the opportunity to make a lasting positive impact. There are additional advantages to consider: Reduced costs – the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) estimates that the average SME can save up to 30 percent on its energy bill by becoming more energy efficient (improved heating and lighting, lower maintenance of electric vehicles, efficient water and materials management and using recycled materials with a lower climate impact all contribute to lower costs);  Reduced reliance on exposure to fluctuating oil and gas prices from switching from fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) to renewable energy sources; Reduced exposure to carbon tax, which is increasing €7.50 per tonne to €100 per tonne in 2030; Access to grants, allowances and tax reliefs; Improved access to capital and finance from investors and lending looking to ‘green’ their portfolios; and A competitive edge in attracting talent, clients and customers. Steps to climate action Businesses looking to take action on the climate crisis can take several steps: Build your knowledge. There are many resources out there, several provided by the Government and Chartered Accountants Ireland. Begin measuring emissions with tools like the Government’s Climate Toolkit for Business.  Consider an internal energy audit to find ways of reducing your carbon footprint. SEAI maintains a list of registered energy auditors and offers SMEs a €2,000 voucher towards the audit cost. Consider setting up an internal environment and climate impact team to devise a decarbonisation plan.  See also the Sustainability Glossary in the Sustainability Centre of the Chartered Accountants Ireland website.  For more, see www.charteredaccountants.ie/sustainability-centre/sustainability-home Susan Rossney is Sustainability Officer at Chartered Accountants Ireland Reporting and climate change The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is an EU Directive requiring certain companies to disclose information on sustainability-related impacts. It proposes significant changes to how entities report on their business’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) impacts. These changes will affect many enterprises – directly and indirectly.  Businesses ‘in scope’ of the CSRD are required to consider their supply chain when reporting on sustainability matters. This will mean that companies not in scope that form part of a supply chain may be asked to provide climate-related information by companies in scope. Small companies should prepare for this and have a mechanism to measure and disclose their carbon emissions. For more on the CSRD, see the Chartered Accountants Ireland Technical Hub. Dee Moran is Professional Accountancy Lead at Chartered Accountants Ireland  

Michael Diviney and Níall Fitzgerald explore the ethical challenges arising from artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ‘narrow’ AI, and highlight the importance of ethics and professional competence in its deployment Earlier this year, artificial intelligence (AI) industry leaders, leading researchers and influencers signed a succinct statement and warning: “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” Was this a publicity stunt? Well, probably not, as the generative AI ChatGPT was already the fastest-adopted application in history.  Was this an over-the-top, alarmist statement by a group possibly trying to steal a march on self-regulation of a rapidly emerging technology and growing industry?  Again, this is unlikely if one considers the warnings of pioneer thinkers like Nick Bostrom, Max Tegmark, Stephen Hawking and Astronomer Royal Martin Rees. They concur that there is an existential threat to humankind if human-level or ‘general’ AI is developed and the ‘singularity’ is reached when AI surpasses human intelligence.  Autonomous weapons and targeting are a clear risk, but more broadly, unless we can ensure that the goals of a future superintelligence are aligned and remain aligned with our goals, we may be considered superfluous and dispensable by that superintelligence.  As well as the extinction threat, general AI presents other potential ethical challenges.  For example, if AI attains subjective consciousness and is capable of suffering, does it then acquire rights? Do we have the right to interfere with these, including the right to attempt to switch it off and end its digital life?  Will AI become a legal entity and have property rights? After all, much of our economy is owned by companies, another form of artificial ‘person’. Ethical challenges from ‘narrow’ AI Until general AI is here, however – and there is informed scepticism about its possibility – the AI tools currently in use are weak or ‘narrow’ AI. They are designed to perform a specific task or a group of related tasks and rely on algorithms to process data on which they have been trained.  Narrow AI presents various ethical challenges:  Unfairness arising from bias and opacity (e.g. AI used in the initial screening of job candidates include a gender bias based on historical data – in the past more men were hired); The right to privacy (AI trained with data without the consent of the data subjects); Threats to physical safety (e.g. self-driving vehicles); Intellectual property and moral rights, plagiarism and passing-off issues in the use of generative AI like ChatGPT and Bard; and Threats to human dignity from the hollowing out of work and loss of purpose. Regulation vs. ethics Such issues arising from the use of AI, particularly related to personal data, mean that regulation is inevitable.  We can see this, for example, with the EU’s landmark AI Act, due to apply by the end of 2025, which aims to regulate AI’s potential to cause harm and to hold companies accountable for how their systems are used. However, as Professor Pat Barker explained at a recent Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (CCAB) webinar, until such laws are in place, and in the absence of clear rules, ethics are required for deciding on the right way to use AI.  Even when the regulation is in place, there are likely to be cases and dilemmas that it has not anticipated or about which it is unclear. Legal compliance should not be assumed to have all the ethical issues covered, and as AI is evolving so quickly, new ethical issues and choices will inevitably emerge.  Ethics involves the application of a decision-making framework to a dilemma or choice about the right thing to do. While such a framework or philosophy can reflect one’s values, it must also be objective, considered, universalisable and not just based on an instinctual response or what may be expedient. Established ethics frameworks include: the consequentialist or utilitarian approach – in the case of AI, does it maximise benefits for the greatest number of people?; and the deontological approach, which is based on first principles, such as the inalienable rights of the individual (an underlying philosophy of the EU’s AI Act). (The Institute’s Ethics Quick Reference Guide, found on the charteredaccountants.ie website, outlines five steps to prepare for ethical dilemmas and decision-making.)  A practical approach While such philosophical approaches are effective for questions like “Should we do this?” and “Is it good for society”, as Reid Blackman argues in Harvard Business Review, businesses and professionals may need a more practical approach, asking: “Given that we are going to [use AI], how can we do it without making ourselves vulnerable to ethical risks?”  Clear protocols, policies, due diligence and an emphasis on ethical risk management and mitigation are required, for example responsible AI clauses in agreements with suppliers. In this respect, accountants have an arguably competitive advantage in being members of a profession; they can access and apply an existing ethical framework, which is evolving and adapting as the technology, its opportunities and challenges change.  The Code of Ethics The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) recently revised the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (Code) to reflect the impact of technology, including AI, on the profession. The Chartered Accountants Ireland Code of Ethics will ultimately reflect these revisions.  IESBA has identified the two types of AI likely to have the most impact on the ethical behaviour of accountants:  Assisted intelligence or robotic process automation (RPA) in which machines carry out tasks previously done by humans, who continue to make decisions; and  Augmented intelligence, which involves collaboration between human and machine in decision-making. The revisions also include guidance on how accountants might address the risks presented by AI to ethical behaviour and decision-making in performing their role and responsibilities.  Professional competence and due care The Code requires an accountant to ensure they have an appropriate level of understanding relevant to their role and responsibilities and the work they undertake. The revisions acknowledge that the accountant’s role is evolving and that many of the activities they undertake can be impacted by AI.  The degree of competency required in relation to AI will be commensurate with the extent of an accountant’s use of and/or reliance on it. While programming AI may be beyond the competency of many accountants, they have the skill set to:  identify and articulate the problem the AI is being used to solve;  understand the type, source and integrity of the data required; and assess the utility and reasonableness of the output.  This makes accountants well placed to advise on aspects of the use of AI. The Code provides some examples of risks and considerations to be managed by professional accountants using AI, including: The data available might not be sufficient for the effective use of the AI tool. The accountant needs to consider the appropriateness of the source data (e.g. relevance, completeness and integrity) and other inputs, such as the decisions and assumptions being used as inputs by the AI. This includes identifying any underlying bias so that it can be addressed in final decision-making. The AI might not be appropriate for the purpose for which the organisation intends to use it. Is it the right tool for the job and designed for that particular purpose? Are users of the AI tool authorised and trained in its correct use within the organisation’s control framework? (One chief technology officer has suggested not only considering the capabilities of the AI tool but also its limitations to be better aware of the risks of something going wrong or where its use may not be appropriate.) The accountant may not have the ability, or have access to an expert with that ability, to understand and explain the AI and its appropriate use.  If the AI has been appropriately tested and evaluated for the purpose intended. The controls relating to the source data and the AI’s design, implementation and use, including user access. So, how does the accountant apply their skills and expertise in this context?  It is expected that accountants will use many of the established skills for which the profession is known to assess the input and interpret the output of an AI tool, including interpersonal, communication and organisational skills, but also technical knowledge relevant to the activity they are performing, whether it is an accounting, tax, auditing, compliance, strategic or operational business decision that is being made.  Data and confidentiality According to the Code, when an accountant receives or acquires confidential information, their duty of confidentiality begins. AI requires data, usually lots of it, with which it is trained. It also requires decisions by individuals in relation to how the AI should work (programming), when it should be used, how its use should be controlled, etc.  The use of confidential information with AI presents several confidentiality challenges for accountants. The Code includes several considerations for accountants in this regard, including: Obtaining authorisation from the source (e.g. clients or customers) for the use of confidential information, whether anonymised or otherwise, for purposes other than those for which it was provided. This includes whether the information can be used for training AI tools.  Considering controls to safeguard confidentiality, including anonymising data, encryption and access controls, and security policies to protect against data leaks.  Ensuring controls are in place for the coding and updating of the AI used in the organisation. Outdated code, bugs and irregular updates to the software can pose a security risk. Reviewing the security certification of the AI tool and ensuring it is up to date can offer some comfort.  Many data breaches result from human error, e.g. inputting confidential information into an open-access web-based application is a confidentiality breach if that information is saved, stored and later used by that application. Staff need to be trained in the correct use and purpose of AI applications and the safeguarding of confidential information. Dealing with complexity The Code acknowledges that technology, including AI, can help manage complexity.  AI tools can be particularly useful for performing complex analysis or financial modelling to inform decision-making or alerting the accountant to any developments or changes that require a re-assessment of a situation. In doing so, vast amounts of data are collected and used by AI, and the ability to check and verify the integrity of the data introduces another level of complexity.  The Code makes frequent reference to “relevancy” in relation to the analysis of information, scenarios, variables, relationships, etc., and highlights the importance of ensuring that data is relevant to the problem or issue being addressed. IESBA was mindful, when revising the Code, that there are various conceivable ways AI tools can be designed and developed to use and interpret data.  For example, objectivity can be challenged when faced with the complexity of divergent views supported by data, making it difficult to come to a decision. AI can present additional complexity for accountants, but the considerations set out in the Code are useful reminders of the essential skills necessary to manage complexity. Changing how we work As well as its hugely beneficial applications in, for example, healthcare and science, AI is proving to be transformative as a source of business value.  With a range of significant new tools launched daily, from personal effectiveness to analysis and process optimisation, AI is changing how we work. These are powerful tools, but with power comes responsibility. For the professional accountant, certain skills will be brought to the fore, including adaptability, change and risk management, and leadership amidst rapidly evolving work practices and business models. Accountants are well placed to provide these skills and support the responsible and ethical use of AI.  Rather than fearing being replaced by AI, accountants can prepare to meet expectations to provide added value and be at the helm of using AI tools for finance, management, strategic decision-making and other opportunities. Michael Diviney is Executive Head of Thought Leadership at Chartered Accountants Ireland Níall Fitzgerald is Head of Ethics and Governance at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Governments may opt for more quantitative easing to prevent global inflation from turning into a recession, writes Cormac Lucey Speaking about the Republic’s budgetary position in 1979, Charles Haughey famously declared that “as a community, we are living beyond our means”. But his remarks might just as well be applied today to Western world democracies.  An article in a June issue of The Economist proclaimed that “Fiscal policy in the rich world is mind-bogglingly reckless”. Global fiscal policy is unsuited to today’s economic circumstances. “High inflation and low unemployment mean the world needs tight policy, not loose,” it said.  Last month, the Department of Finance’s chief economist indicated that between 2019–2070, annual age-related expenditure is projected to increase from 21.4 to 31.5 percent of Irish national output. With a projected 2023 modified gross national income of €284 billion this year, that rise would cost €28.4 billion today. That’s over €10,000 annually for every person working, more than the budgetary damage done by the financial crash 15 years ago and roughly equal to one-third of total budgeted tax revenues this year.  The situation in the UK isn’t much better.  A report on “Fiscal Risks and Sustainability” from the Office for Budget Responsibility in July, projected an increase in primary spending between 2022–23 and 2072–73 of 8.6 percent of UK GDP. That’s equivalent to roughly £2.2 trillion in terms of today’s GDP, or around £6,000 annually per person working. Faced with inexorable spending pressures on one hand and political resistance to tax rises on the other, there is a structural risk that our political leaders will opt for greater borrowing as the way out.  The USA may be the forerunner in this regard.  It began running enormous budget deficits under President Trump even though the US economy was operating at near full capacity. It has continued this practice under President Biden. There has been no discernible political cost to be paid by either administration. And, as the issuer of the world’s largest reserve currency, it has seen precious little economic cost so far.  Fiscal dominance is shorthand for the fiscal needs of the central government dominating monetary policy set by central banks and occurs when central banks create fresh money (via quantitative easing) to prop up the prices of government debt securities and , thereby, contain the consequent interest rates.  Between 2009–2021, the share of their government’s issued debt held by central banks grew by about 15 percent in the USA and around 30 percent in the UK and the Eurozone. In essence, central banks were able to do something inflationary (create a lot of fresh money) because external circumstances were already very deflationary.  A justification can always be found: economies must be sustained through the financial crisis; we must not let a pandemic morph into a depression. The political cost was negligible. We can, therefore, expect more of the same in the future when fiscal push comes to monetary shove.  The constraint on fiscal dominance will not be rules or laws governing what is right or wrong but expedience: what can policymakers get away with?  The practical constraints will be financial market reactions and any inflationary effects of monetary loosening. But there may not be any noticeable market reaction: the Bank of Japan owns an estimated 45 percent of all Japanese government debt without any allergic market reaction.  The key question is whether inflationary pressures are stoked by aggressive fiscal dominance. The return of inflation explains why monetary restriction has replaced monetary exuberance.  But once inflation is out of the way, expect fiscal dominance (and more money-printing) to resume. That would be bullish for real assets (such as property and commodities) and bearish for paper assets.   Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland

Accountancy Ireland sits down with Carol Phelan, CFO of Dalata Hotel Group. From her journey at one of the Big Four to private equity, Phelan shares her insights into the business side of the hospitality industry and Dalata’s people-centric approach to success A lifelong interest in business took Carol Phelan on a career path that has seen her work in a Big Four firm, an Irish private equity house and, ultimately, become CFO of Dalata Hotel Group – Ireland’s largest hotel operator. Speaking to Accountancy Ireland  in Dalata’s new state-of-the-art headquarters in Sandyford in south Dublin, Phelan explains how she grew up on a farm in County Laois and was always interested in business.   “At school, I gravitated towards business success stories, particularly Irish ones. I was always strong with numbers – they made sense to me, but it wasn’t just about balancing the books. It’s what people are doing with the business. I did a broad Business degree at the University of Limerick. I specialised in accounting and finance and did a Master’s in Accounting. I knew it was a qualification that would stand to me whatever I did.” Her undergraduate degree included an internship component, and in a forerunner of her future career, it took her to work in a hotel in France for nine months. “I got to work with numbers in a real business and found I could bring some skill to that.” After college, she joined KPMG and qualified as a Chartered Accountant.  “I wanted to develop my skills and build my professional and business network,” she says. “I worked in the financial services and transaction services divisions. That allowed me to work with companies doing deals and making strategic acquisitions. I was able to go into businesses of different sizes in various sectors and work with leading advisors. I enjoyed my time with KPMG.” She also learned something about herself. “I realised I didn’t want to be an advisor. I wanted to be the one making the decisions and living with them.” Moving on from the Big Four Phelan joined private equity house Ion Equity in 2007, just before the global financial crash hit. It could hardly have been a more challenging time for that sector.  “It took me out of my comfort zone,” she says with no little understatement. “It was about going in, putting deals together, and putting money behind them. It was also about helping finance teams in investee companies deal with the challenges presented by the crash.” Given her qualifications and experience, she was often asked why she didn’t go to one of the major international private equity firms. “I wanted to be where the leadership was,” she explains. “I wanted to be close to the decisions. No matter how small a role I had, I wanted to be part of the decision making.” Her next move saw her join Dalata in 2014.  “I wanted to get into the finance function of a large Irish company,” Phelan explains. “The Dalata opportunity came up, and it ticked all the boxes. The people leading the company shared my values – ambition, a desire to grow and challenge oneself, and always wanting to do better. Dalata has that in spades.  “The company has always been led by people very concerned about building a business that works for everyone and not just about generating higher numbers and profits. They want a business that creates opportunities for everybody. I knew the people in Dalata before I joined, so I knew it was all true.” The company was on the cusp of significant change when she joined. “It was just after the IPO. All the structures had to be built to accommodate it. I was able to use my skills for that. It was great to have that challenge.” A people-centric business The culture of the business is very important to Phelan.  “Hospitality is a very people-centric business. It’s about more than numbers and the bottom line. That sits well with me and my background. Dalata has always said it wants people with ambition: ambition to grow and develop themselves but to bring others with them, as well.” Dalata places great store by training and development, with over 113,00 training courses completed by its staff in 2022.  “The company is growing and ambitious. I can’t tell you the opportunities that will exist in three years, but we will put everything behind people who want to grow and develop.  “People who joined the company in 2015 are now working in roles that didn’t exist back then. We give people support to get the experience and skills and take on those roles. We opened seven hotels in 2022, and the majority of the leadership teams in them is made up of people developed in Dalata. That creates opportunities for those following behind them.”  Career mobility is also important. “You can join the finance team here, but who knows where you will end up. We have operations people who ended up in finance and operations people who started in finance. You can’t pigeonhole people. As a major plc, we also have all the finance strands here so someone can build a full suite of experience.” There is a need to look beyond functional skills, she adds. “You can develop skills for a role in finance, but it has never been just about the numbers. I can tell by sitting across the table from someone if targets will be met without looking at numbers on a page. We all have that ability if we work on it.” The people-centric approach delivers real business benefits. “We see ourselves as an employer of choice. That’s very important in the hospitality industry. We are not as challenged as others in the industry regarding recruitment. We are now back at 2019 job vacancy rates. We will always have several vacancies. That’s the nature of the business.” “The only way was up” She was appointed Group CFO on 1 July 2021. “The only way was up, having been shut down for most of the previous two years [during the pandemic],” she says with a smile. “It was easy coming in after that. Anyone can look like a hero in those circumstances.” Looking back on COVID-19, she believes it showed Dalata at its best.  “We never panicked. We stood back and said it would resolve itself. That was based on a genuine belief that science would get there. That was our underlying expectation, and we had to be ready when we came out the other side. We looked at it through a longer lens. Everyone stepped in to do whatever needed to be done. Our bottom line was to protect our people. They represent our biggest asset. The accounting standards haven’t figured out a way to measure the strategic value of people yet, but we know what it is.” The aim was to keep people employed during COVID-19.  “Our focus was on everyone doing the right things in the right ways to keep people on. That’s the Dalata way of doing things. We ensured all our people had full access to the Dalata Online Academy. Even at home, they could continue to grow and develop.” The operations software platform also proved its worth. “We use it in the hotels for people management, rostering, onboarding, as a communications tool, and for pushing out video updates,” Phelan explains. “We have a lot of young people in the industry, and the ability to access information over the phone is so important to them, particularly when they can’t get together physically. We ensured people remained connected to the business even when apart.” That approach was extended to customers, landlords, suppliers, bankers and other stakeholders.  “We gave refunds to customers when they asked for them. We never even considered not paying rent. All our decisions were taken with a view to the long term. That will stand to us in the future.” Growth Having delivered record profits in 2022, there will be no let-up in the growth and development of Dalata Hotel Group, Phelan says.  “We now have 52 hotels in Ireland, the UK and continental Europe, and another five in the pipeline in London, Brighton, Manchester and Dublin. Forty percent of our rooms are in Dublin, 40 percent in the UK, and the balance is in regional Ireland and continental Europe.  “We have great ambitions for continental Europe, but our priority growth focus is the UK. There is a gap in the four-star hotel market, and we are in a great position to fill it. Dalata is a very ambitious company. The focus is always on what’s next. I love that attitude. But there is strong discipline. There will never be trophy assets in Dalata. Everything must make sense for the broader business and deliver a return for our shareholders.”  She concludes by pointing out that her own role reflects the core values of Dalata.  “I am an executive director and sit on the board as well as leading the finance team. I must be able to contribute to Dalata strategically, not just in my own expert area. Board members need to be able to challenge each other. We may approach it from slightly different angles, but it’s important to hear everyone’s views. That’s the Dalata culture overall. People are encouraged to bring their individuality to work. Everyone is encouraged to have a voice and to speak up. Who we are and where we’ve come from shapes that. We all bring different perspectives to the debate.”

Start-ups looking to grow have a range of options but carefully considering accounting standards is one way to reduce complexity, write Wuraola Raheem and Paddy McGhee For many Irish high-growth start-ups, the early years are consumed by the cash burn of developing a new product, followed by the cost of growing the market. The nuances of accounting standards are often a secondary consideration.  However, not being aware of some of the accounting standards considerations can have a negative impact on investor confidence and regulatory compliance. Here are nine areas of complexity that often arise for high-growth companies at the start of their journey. IFRS or FRS 102? If an organisation has an international shareholder base and international customers and suppliers, should it use IFRS?  While IFRS is a complete standard recognised globally, its measurement and valuation criteria, together with its disclosure requirements, are burdensome for a small company.  FRS 102 was written with small companies in mind, and in most cases, for a growing company, it will work as well as IFRS.  The decision to move to IFRS will be better taken when the company matures. For example, if a firm acquires other businesses along the way, the requirements for assessing the purchase price allocation are more onerous under IFRS than FRS 102.  Similarly, disclosure requirements are more onerous under IFRS. Revenue recognition There are very few modern businesses for which revenue recognition arises when the invoice is issued. Many companies provide multiple services and warranties, give a right of return or provide a service over a period of time or – increasingly in the tech sector – based on consumption.  This will give rise to the possibility of accrued revenue in which the service is provided in advance of billing or deferred revenue if billing has occurred, but the service or good has not been fully delivered. IFRS, US GAAP and FRS 102 are mainly consistent in their treatment of when revenue is recognised. Many growing companies enter into tailored contracts in order to make those first few sales often giving rise to additional free services or warranties that may lead to revenue deferrals.  Many other firms enter into agreements with large platform companies to sell their products or services, and the lines between marketing and delivery costs and net revenue can become blurred. Accounting for venture capital As companies begin to raise equity, the type of financing used is often not ordinary shares. Common forms of investing include: convertible loan notes; preferential loan notes; preference shares; and shares with a liquidation preference. Today, few investments are in the form of a loan or equity as investors look to protect their investment by having some form of preference. There is often a level of negotiation in these, so funding instruments will almost always have some individual nuances. The impact is that some convertible instruments include a hybrid instrument that needs to be assessed or, in other instances, while something may be called a ‘share’, if it has a fixed return, it may be accounted for as debt. Many companies also overlook the fact that the direct costs of raising equity are recognised in equity, or direct costs relating to debt are capitalised and amortised using an effective interest rate method. It’s not to say that many costs leading up to a finance raise are expensed, such as due diligence fees. Share-based payments There has been much valid criticism in Ireland that share-based remuneration has not received more tax concessions. For a young company, a popular route to attract staff is to offer share options, reducing the cash outlay.  In theory, share options are provided in lieu of a cash salary. Because of this, accounting standards require the intrinsic value of share options at the date they are issued to be recognised as an expense over the service period. Depending on the perceived volatility of the shares and the rights attached to them, this can result in a sizeable non-cash charge to the income statement and one that often does not appear in management accounts. Investing in cloud infrastructure The treatment of expenditure linking a business to cloud-based software has recently been a hot topic for large companies.  The reason for this is that IFRS accounting standard setters recently reminded companies that where they invest in linkages to a cloud-based infrastructure, the related costs should be expensed rather than capitalised on the basis that the firms do not own or control the cloud-based software. This meant that several multi-million Euro enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation projects were expensed rather than capitalised.  It is easy to see the frustration that some reporters faced as they will receive the benefit of those costs over several years. With many companies reliant on cloud-based infrastructure, it can be a shock to learn that not all the related costs meet the criteria for capitalisation. Capitalised development expenditure “Our enterprise value is €XX million so how come we cannot recognise that value on our balance sheet?” is a common question, followed by: “Given we have spent €XX million on product development, can we capitalise that?” Accounting standards are very detailed on what can be capitalised and what is expensed. Generally, costs relating to internally generated brands, start-up costs, training activities, research, advertising and internally generated goodwill are expensed. The one area in which companies may capitalise costs is where such costs relate to the development of a product or process that can be shown to bring future economic benefit.  There are, however, concise rules on what may be capitalised. While costs can be, it does not mean such costs meet the criteria for claiming research and development (R&D) tax credits.  While the costs can be closely aligned, they are not mutually inclusive. International expansion Given the size of Ireland’s indigenous market, most companies look to international expansion early on. Initially, companies need to assess how they will expand: Do they use foreign subsidiaries to make sales? Is a foreign subsidiary used for providing services to the parent company in sales and marketing, local maintenance or R&D? Regardless of the role played by the foreign subsidiary, from a tax perspective, the share of the taxable profit each country will get will need to be determined. This is where the concept of transfer pricing comes in, and companies need to determine where the profit would reside if the various companies were unrelated. Increasingly with foreign expansion, companies have to deal with employee taxes for foreign employees or employees who move to a new market to help set up a presence. Consolidation requirement As companies grow, they reach a stage where there is a requirement to prepare consolidated statutory financial statements. At a basic level, if a company is defined as a small company under Irish law, it is not required to prepare consolidated accounts. The requirement for consolidated accounts kicks in when a company exceeds two of the following criteria two years in a row: Third-party turnover of €20 million; Gross assets of €10 million; and/or 250 employees. Given the relatively high-level criteria for employee numbers, companies generally meet the requirement when they reach the turnover limit. Other regulatory requirements Irish company law and accounting requirements are generally well legislated for, ensuring that small companies are not overly regulated.  Having reached the consolidation requirement at €20 million turnover, a private company’s next legislative bar is the requirement to have a directors’ compliance statement if it reaches €25 million turnover. Having reached a consolidated turnover of €50 million, a company is required to put an audit committee in place or explain why one is not required. Wuraola Raheem is Audit Manager in Consumer Technology Business at Deloitte Paddy McGhee is Audit Manager in Consumer Technology Business at Deloitte