Dr John McCallig’s research into the accounting system of the future built on blockchain technology and cryptography has earned him a sought-after award for invention, writes Arlene Harris. As Assistant Professor in Accountancy at the UCD Lochlann Quinn School of Business and the UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School, Dr John McCallig has long held a fascination for business, financial systems and the ways in which technology can improve both. Even as a teenager growing up in Claremorris, Co. Mayo, McCallig, now a Fellow Chartered Accountant, recalls an early interest in “the world of numbers” and emerging computer technology. After learning how to programme early home computers, McCallig went on to complete a degree in commerce at NUI Galway followed by a DPA (now Master of Accounting) at UCD.  “My research career began with PhD studies at Lancaster University in the UK and my thesis and subsequent research focused on the relationship between stock market returns and accounting numbers,” said McCallig.  “More recently, I have become interested in how the use of cryptography in business systems could produce better data for decisions by investors, regulators, and the public.” This interest is proving fruitful for McCallig, who was recently named recipient of the 2022 Invention of the Year Award by NovaUCD, the Centre for New Ventures and Entrepreneurs at University College Dublin.  Announced in March at the 2022 NovaUCD Innovation Awards, the prize was given to McCallig in recognition of his research into the use of blockchain technology and advanced cryptography to design accounting systems that could enable transparent access to verifiable data.  Through this research, McCallig has established that building such systems is theoretically possible and could potentially lead to a complete redesign of financial reporting processes in the future. His award-winning invention uses privacy-preserving analytics to collect and share commercially sensitive information about VAT obligations and payments.  This innovation can confirm that the proper VAT payments have been made—in real-time and without breaching the privacy of any individuals or firms involved.  The potential impact of this invention would be to provide the basis for a system that could interact “natively” with the digital economy to help build a modern and fair tax system, according to McCallig.  Now, he is keen to find out more about how his invention might work in practice.  “I have been working with NovaUCD on the commercialisation of my research on the use of cryptography in the VAT reporting and payment system and I am delighted and deeply honoured to have received the 2022 NovaUCD Invention of the Year Award,” he said.  “I appreciate the recognition this award gives to innovative ways of ensuring privacy and data integrity in critical social systems, like the VAT payment system.” Cryptography is the practice and study of secure communication techniques that allow the contents of a message to be viewed only by the sender and its intended recipient. “Many people think of cryptography as all or nothing—you encrypt a file, in which case nobody else can get any information about it, or you leave it unencrypted,” said McCallig. “In fact, modern cryptography provides a rich toolbox of techniques, which can be used to provide partial access to information.  “One example is homomorphic cryptography, whereby mathematical operations can be performed on encrypted data.” McCallig pointed to pay gap research published last year by Boston Women’s Workforce Council in the US, which collected payroll data in a secure manner without revealing information sourced from any individual company involved in the study. “One idea I have been working on myself is how a company’s receivables can be confirmed in a more efficient way,” McCallig said. “This relies on both the company and its receivables encrypting data about the obligations, so that data from the company and the debtors can be compared without revealing the data.” Although he does not foresee a future in which the fundamentals of accounting will change, McCallig is convinced that digital technology will play an ever greater role. “The digitalisation of accounting data in companies is nearly complete. Almost all significant enterprises have sophisticated Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems,” he says.  “The interfaces between businesses are still mainly manual, however, with information being shared using email and PDFs.  “Here, there is an opportunity to design systems that not only allow the secure exchange of information, but also provide access to high-quality information for auditors and stakeholders.” Advanced cryptographic systems are, McCallig believes, ideal for this kind of application.  “I am fascinated by the role of information in business decision-making and resource allocation in the economy,” he said. “Accountants play a key role in providing this information and my interest is in exploring whether advanced information systems could improve the quality of this information.” As he continues his work at UCD—where he teaches financial accounting, financial statement analysis and accounting technology—McCallig is intent on ensuring that the next generation of accountants are fully up-to-speed with the various technologies playing a role in the future of finance. “It has been a privilege to teach and research at UCD and I am hoping to introduce more material on accounting technology, data analytics, blockchains and cryptography into the university’s accounting curriculum in the future.”

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has given rise to potentially complex financial reporting considerations for Irish companies with a presence in one or both territories. David Drought delves into the details of two areas of concern. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, and resulting sanctions and counter sanctions imposed globally on and by Russia, have impacted certain companies.  Although the conflict is first and foremost an immense human tragedy for those involved, companies whose operations have been affected will need to consider the financial reporting implications.  Here, we consider two potential issues—the first being whether control of subsidiaries located in Russia has been lost, and the second being whether impairment tests of non-financial assets in the affected territories should be carried out. Do you continue to control your subsidiary?  Under IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, a company (investor) controls a subsidiary (investee) when it has power over the subsidiary, is exposed to variable returns from its involvement with the subsidiary, and can also affect those returns by exercising its power. Control requires power, exposure to the variability of returns, and a linkage between the two. Continuous control assessment  Suppose the facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the elements of the control model. In this scenario, an investor must reassess whether it continues to have control over the investee.  Here, companies will need to consider whether the consequences of the ongoing conflict lead to changes in investors’ relationships with investees in Russia. As a result of the effects of the ongoing conflict, for example, foreign investors may: face difficulties in repatriating funds from investees; exit or cease operations in these markets, either by choice or by being forced to do so because of sanctions imposed; or be impacted by potential new restrictions imposed on foreign owners – e.g. nationalisation of local operations. The hurdle for losing control of an existing subsidiary is generally high, but the loss of control of subsidiaries in the conflict-affected countries or regions should not be immediately presumed.  There is, for example, no exclusion from consolidation due to difficulties alone in repatriating funds from the subsidiary to the parent or the lack of exchangeability of currencies.  In considering the impact of these ongoing conflicts, management must consider these two critical elements of control: power and returns. Power When assessing power over the investee, an investor considers only substantive rights relating to an investee – i.e. rights that it has the practical ability to exercise.  Determining whether rights are substantive requires judgement. Whether there are any barriers due to the consequences of the ongoing conflict preventing the holder from exercising these rights should be considered (e.g. due to current sanctions a company may no longer be able to exercise rights previously available to it.) Returns When assessing returns, an investor evaluates if they are exposed to variable returns from involvement with an investee. The sources of these returns may be very broad and may include both positive and negative returns.  Sources might include dividend or other economic benefits, for example, remuneration for services provided to the investee, tax benefits or certain residual interests.  Management should consider whether the company’s exposure to the variability of returns has been impacted and needs to be reassessed. IFRS 10 does not establish a minimum level of exposure to returns to have control.  Where there has not been a loss of control, there may be other impacts to consider. These might include: possible impairment of the investment in the subsidiary; presentation of the subsidiary as held-for-sale or as a discontinued operation; or  possible impairment of the assets held by the subsidiary. Do I need to test my non-financial assets for impairment? Control in relation to other assets  Before considering impairment for companies with assets on the ground in Russia or Ukraine, it is necessary to assess whether they have, in substance, lost control of those assets.  Control in the context of assets generally means the practical ability to control the use of the underlying asset. If control has been lost, the asset is derecognised in its entirety, and no impairment is carried out. IAS 36 Impairment of assets  The standard requires management to assess whether there is any indication of impairment at the end of each reporting period.  Irrespective of any indicator of impairment, the standard requires goodwill, and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives (and those not yet available for use) to be tested for impairment at least annually. An annual test is required alongside any impairment tests performed as a result of a triggering event. Triggering events  The likelihood that a triggering event has occurred for non-current assets has increased significantly for companies that: have significant assets or operations in Russia or Ukraine; are significantly affected by the sanctions imposed and/or Russia’s counter-measures; are adversely affected by increases in the price of commodities; and/or are significantly affected by supply chain disruption. Impairment indicators  Indicators of impairment may come from internal or external sources, but the likelihood of some impairment indicators existing has increased for companies impacted by the Russia-Ukraine war. Some indicators that may arise include: the obsolescence or physical damage of an asset. For example, plants and operations in Ukraine may be subject to physical damage; significant changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is (or is expected to be) used which has (or will have) an adverse effect on the entity.  a significant and unexpected decline in market value; significant adverse effects in the technological, market, economic or legal environment, including the impact of sanctions on the entity’s ability to operate in a market; a rise in market interest rates, which will increase the discount rate used to determine an asset’s value in use; and the carrying amount of the net assets of an entity exceeding its market capitalisation. Falling stock prices may result in an entity’s net assets being greater than its market capitalisation. Abandonment or idle assets  Companies may have abandoned—or have considered a plan to abandon—certain operations or properties in Russia or Ukraine.  Some companies may have been forced to abandon owned or leased facilities in Ukraine as a result of the war, for example. In such cases, the company needs to accelerate or impair the depreciation of the property based on the revised anticipated usage or residual value. Assets lefts temporarily idle are not regarded as abandoned—for example, when a company temporarily shuts a manufacturing facility but intends to resume operations after military activities in the area abate.  Although temporarily idling a facility may trigger an impairment of that item (or the CGU to which it belongs), a company does not stop depreciating the item while it is idle—unless it is fully depreciated or is classified as held-for-sale. Companies should, however, consider the most appropriate depreciation method in this situation.  Disclosures When reporting in uncertain times, it is essential to provide the users of financial statements with appropriate insight into the key assumptions and judgements made by the company when preparing financial information. Depending on an entity’s specific circumstances, each area above may be a source of material judgement and uncertainty requiring disclosure. David Drought is a director in the Accounting Advisory team at KPMG in Ireland

Delta Partners’ Maurice Roche has Ireland’s next generation of tech unicorns in his sights with the launch of the VC firm’s latest fund, writes Clare O’Sullivan. With the launch of its latest €70 million fund, Dublin-based venture capital firm Delta Partners is targeting the newest generation of promising seed and early-stage technology businesses across Ireland.    Announced in April, the fund is the sixth to be launched by Delta since its formation in 1995. In the years since, Delta has backed over 120 companies, realising a mammoth €1.8 billion.      The new fund is backed by limited partners (LP) including Bank of Ireland, Enterprise Ireland and Fexco as well as the family offices of successful Irish technology entrepreneurs. Bank of Ireland has been an investor in Delta’s previous funds and has a number of initiatives/products aimed at the technology sector. Fexco is a new LP to Delta and widely regarded for its innovation in the fintech sector. Previous companies that have received investment from Delta include Clavis, the e-commerce company sold to London’s Ascential plc in 2017, Neuravi, the Galway-based medtech firm acquired by Johnson & Johnson in the same year, and SensL Technologies—sold to ON Semiconductor in 2018. Delta’s current portfolio, meanwhile, includes Luzern, the Dublin-based e-commerce platform, and Sirius XT, a UCD spin-out developing the world’s first commercial lab-scale microscope. It is a diverse portfolio—and necessarily so, according to Maurice Roche, General Partner at Delta Partners and a Fellow of the Institute. “In a market as small as Ireland, you nearly need to be sector-agnostic as a VC investor. Our main focus is tech, but it makes sense for us to have a range of investments in the broader tech sphere,” Roche said. With the launch of Delta’s latest fund, as many as 30 start-ups will be in the running for funding over the next three to four years. “We will focus on a spread of early stage companies where we aim to be the first institutional investors , i.e. at the early seed stage (companies raising capital to develop the product and prove the value proposition with customers) to late seed (companies raising capital to scale on the back initial customer traction and have early signs of product/market fit),” said Roche. Among all potential investees, a top priority for Delta will be the people involved. “The numbers are important, obviously, but it’s also about the people to a huge extent, the market and the opportunity,” Roche said. “You want to be confident that the management team is capable of developing the product and getting early customer wins. The people behind the product really matter.” A case in point is Richard Barnwell, who recently joined Delta as a partner from Digit Games, the gaming studio he founded in Dublin in 2012. A previous investee of Delta Partners, Digit was acquired three years ago by Scopley, the LA-based gaming company. Another new addition to the Delta Partners team is Amy Neale, who is joining from Mastercard where she led fintech innovation teams globally. “Richard has real start-up experience, and he has been successful, so I think he will be a great support to the entrepreneurs we work with,” Roche said. “Amy is our first female partner and a very valuable addition because she has ‘lived’ in the fintech ecosystem through her role with Mastercard, and fintech is a sector we have invested in, and will continue to invest in, with our new fund.” The fund has reached a first close with Bank of Ireland and Enterprise Ireland as cornerstone investors, supported by Fexco and several family offices. New investors will be added to the fund in the months ahead. “We are extremely thankful to our investors who have entrusted Delta with their capital to invest in the next cohort of Ireland’s early-stage technology companies” Roche added. “This fund will be aimed at what we see as the funding gap for early-stage companies in Ireland. Great Irish entrepreneurs are succeeding across the technology spectrum and the main thing they lack is capital to help them achieve their ambitions,” Roche said. “Our focus will be the start of their journey and helping them to succeed at that foundational level.” A veteran of the VC sector in Ireland, Roche joined Delta Partners at its inception 27 years ago. “I qualified in 1990 and spent some time working in corporate finance where I gained experience advising companies raising venture capital. I was interested in technology, and it was serendipity really that I met Frank Kelly, the founder of Delta, by chance one day playing golf.  “Frank had come back from the States to set up a VC fund in Ireland and he was looking to hire. We got talking and I’ve been part of the Delta story ever since.” In that time, Roche has borne witness to the Dot.com crash, the recovery of the global tech sector, the launch of the iPhone and the rise of the mobile app, and the transition from on-site IT to Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) in an increasingly digital world. “From my own experience, I would say that Irish start-ups have done well in business-to-business (B2B) applications, particularly in fintech and payments,” he said. “We have a very strong entrepreneurial tradition and a lot of very successful companies that have scaled internationally across SaaS and enterprise applications spanning digital health, customer data analytics, customer experience management and many other areas. “We will always be looking at markets ripe for disruption because, where change is happening and new innovations are gaining traction, there is opportunity.” Right now, cybersecurity is one such market rich with opportunity, according to Roche.   “If you look at what has happened in the last few years, businesses have become a lot more conscious of the need to protect their data,” he said.  “We have seen a marked rise in phishing and other cyber-attacks. That has made people much more aware of data protection and privacy. As a result, we’re seeing a lot of money going into cybersecurity, particularly cloud-based offerings.” Another big focus for Roche is fintech. “We have seen just how transformational fintech can be from the consumer point-of-view and person-to-person payments with the rise of digital banking apps like Revolut and N26. “Our main interest here is on the B2B side, because the transformational effects technology continues to have in the enterprise space is enormous and there is a lot of potential there.  “We’ve also seen the speed at which tech start-ups in Ireland like Flipdish and Wayflyer have achieved unicorn status. “With this new fund, we want to find the very best tech start-ups out there waiting to be discovered and give them the funding and the support they need to achieve the global success they deserve.”

Accountancy was well on its way to digital transformation long before COVID-19, but it can’t be denied that post-pandemic, the digitalisation of the profession has come a long way. Five members discuss their firm’s digital transformation and their role within it. David O’Connor Director Sheil Kinnear Our organisation operated, as many practices, did with an on-premises server and that worked well to a point but as demand for more flexibility grew as a response to the pandemic, it became an obvious option for us to take. In partnership with Datapac, moving to the cloud has futureproofed the business. We have learned to be more flexible and conscious of the risks around us. It has become more and more apparent that cyber security is a concern as we move toward a more paperless, digital environment. As a firm that does statutory audits, the ability to securely access our various software tools from anywhere was a huge incentive for us. I think there is an improvement in terms of what can get done no matter where you are. We are also benefitting from superior processing speeds both in the office and remotely. A challenge in our sector now is the transfer of knowledge. It’s huge in our business and people who work remotely still have to pass on that knowledge to trainees and other team members. This takes a lot more structure and scheduling.  I think there is a change towards more flexible working, but we do like to get together as a team and share knowledge and, because of that, it’s going to be hybrid going forward. Emer McCarthy  Group Strategy and Ecommerce Director Kilkenny Group We set up a “Go Digital” initiative a few years ago to transform as a company and become a true omnichannel retailer.  We defined a range of important steps and investments around channels, technology, and organisational restructuring to realise the omnichannel strategy.  We are one of the first to market with our VR store experience, giving potential shoppers worldwide an immersive, in-store experience from the comfort of their own homes. It allows our customers to engage with the Kilkenny Design brand in a completely new and unique way when the way we shop has undergone such a dramatic shift. COVID-19 has driven dramatic change in the digital space, and consumers have adapted accordingly. We have seen a decade of change over the last two years, and businesses need to continuously invest in experiences or processes via digital to meet and exceed the needs of the evolving omnichannel consumer.  Thankfully, we had commenced this journey before the pandemic, which allowed us to navigate an otherwise tricky trading period for bricks and mortar during the pandemic.   Our culture is very open to technology and the benefits that it brings. Embedding technology and new processes bring a level of change management but collectively, our culture has embraced the same by bringing our teams on the journey with us. Our environment has changed the need to adapt quickly to trends. COVID-19 has driven dramatic change in customers’ digital knowledge and use, which expedites the need to roll out pipeline projects sooner and plan to meet consumer needs three years in advance, at least. Louise Heffernan  Audit and Practice Manager Hugh McCarthy & Associates The pandemic exposed a weakness many firms weren’t prepared for and are now forced to adapt to, highlighting how behind some of us were in the digital age, primarily facilitating working remotely and having a strong online and digital presence.  We took this opportunity to begin a rebrand of the firm, working towards moving all systems online and providing additional training where needed.  We understand Rome wasn’t built in a day, but we are in the final stage of an online rebrand, transitioning to a paperless office and entirely cloud-based within four years.  My role in this has been writing and redesigning the website, developing a strategy with the marketing team, working with the IT team to develop a future cloud-based infrastructure, securing software that is online while ensuring GDPR compliance and setting out a four-year plan to go paperless while upskilling the team to ease with the gradual transition. The company has changed in so many ways. While our team chose to come back into the office, there is an option to work from home, providing a higher level of trust amongst the team and strengthening team communication. Giving the option to work from home also shows we value our employees and understand and appreciate the importance of life outside the office. Because of our digital focus, I have changed how I train the team, making sure all resources are available online while developing the team’s IT literacy. And my role has evolved – I now work with marketing and focus on long-term strategic planning while heavily analysing future costs. Bill O’Leary  Director  Goldbay Consulting Four years ago, I introduced accounting software to offshore wind energy consultants, delivering user-friendly automated features. Its reporting capability significantly enhanced the quality, relevance, and timeliness of our management information, which supported profitable business growth.  In March 2020, the pandemic forced us to change how we worked and the so-called “paperless office” had finally arrived.  My organisation implemented video conferencing software. Weekly and operational review meetings, and bi-monthly revenue assurance meetings with directors and senior fee earners were critical in managing revenue and cash flow during the pandemic.  More recently, our focus is on improving operating margin by using data management tools to extract, process and present project margin information in a graphical format to the leadership team. Collaboratively, we review project information, seek to understand the past better and work to agree on actions to modify future behaviour and increase performance.  Leveraging modern software and related digital processes have enabled me to provide the tools, coupled with knowledge, to empower our project leaders to make better informed financial decisions.  The benefits of digitisation and automation of processes are not always linear. As more simple and repetitive tasks are automated, the remaining work becomes more complex – which creates several challenges, such as increasing demands being placed on senior fee earners and the training and development staff becoming more complex.  The answer, which is nothing new, lies in how we use the wealth of digital information available today. How we extract, analyse, synthesise, present, communicate, discuss, understand, and act on the fruits of digital transformation is critical to unlocking the benefits of the digital revolution.  David Heath  CEO Circit At Circit, we have tried to create a culture of digital transformation from the company’s very beginning. With the assumption that technology will continue to evolve at pace, our team is encouraged to be tuned in to what is available in the market and trial services that they believe our organisation and people can benefit from.  This does not mean we implement every new tool we are aware of, but we do become better at monitoring the market, assessing the potential positive benefits of a new cloud service, and getting the timing right for making a change. By having a mentality of being adaptive, we can more easily advise and be an example for our customers who are also on their own digital transformation journey. Lockdowns and viruses have accelerated business trends already underway for companies, like moving to the cloud and modernising their IT departments, but it has also made them think about how their employees can work more efficiently. We’re moving from it being about ‘work from home’ to it being about entirely new ways of doing work.  For example, in the past few weeks, I’ve held investor meetings over video conference instead of in person, with the same – if not better – results.  Instead of thinking about who’s in an office, I’ve also been broadening the scope of who I chat with and when. On an average day, I’m probably talking to five times the number of people from different time zones than when I worked at the office. After all, anyone I want to communicate with is only a chat bubble and video call away. I think we will be forever changed, but now the challenge is to get the balance and team culture correct – one that is digital-first, security risk averse, being personable and willing to travel to in-person meetings to maintain a deeper connection with customers. 

Economic conditions might seems prime for investment, but with a recession on the horizon, Cormac Lucey recommends looking at the global economic outlook before you make any decisions. Capital allocation is a senior management team’s most fundamental responsibility, according to Michael J. Mauboussin and Dan Callahan in their essay “Capital Allocation: Evidence, Analytical Methods, and Assessment Guidance”.  Capital allocation is always important but is imperative today as the return on invested capital is high, growth is modest and corporate balance sheets have plenty of cash.  Unfortunately, there is one key risk on the horizon today that may upend many investment decisions: the prospect of a global economic downturn.  Recessions are one of the most significant risks that confront senior managers. They weaken financial performance and cause company values and share prices to drop. Suppose those drops are accentuated by expensive investments or acquisitions made on the eve of a recession. In that case, they can unleash a search for managerial scapegoats that lead to executives departing their positions “to pursue other interests”.  However, whether one looks at the USA, China or the eurozone, the immediate economic outlook is gloomy. GDP growth has gone negative in America, which recorded an annualised -1.4 percent rate in the first quarter, and that’s before the Federal Reserve’s interest rate tightening campaign began to bite.  April’s US consumer price index surprised on the upside, with the core measure rising 0.6 percent month-on-month, or 6.2 percent year-on-year. With monthly price rises at this level, it will be difficult for elevated base effects from last year to decrease the annual inflation rate. That high inflation data came shortly after labour market reports showed a 20-year record for the ratio of job vacancies to numbers unemployed.  This recent data is only likely to harden the Fed in its resolve to choke inflation out of the US economy. Bill Dudley, a former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, recently warned investors to pay closer attention to the words of Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve (Fed).  “Financial conditions need to tighten. If this does not happen on its own (which seems unlikely), the Fed will have to shock markets to achieve the desired response. This would mean hiking the federal funds rate higher than currently anticipated. One way or another, to get inflation under control, the Fed will need to push bond yields higher and stock prices lower,” Dudley stated. The situation in China provides little comfort. Whereas its economy often provides a counterweight to US influences (growing fast when the US is growing slowly and vice versa), the Chinese authorities’ zero-COVID-19 policy is choking economic activity. China could already be in a recession.  Shanghai’s port activity is falling faster than in early 2020, when the COVID-19 outbreak caused the entire global economy to shut down. Chinese purchasing manager index measures have already fallen well below 50, signalling a contraction in activity levels.  In Europe, inflation has also become too uncomfortable for the European Central Bank. President Lagarde has said that quantitative easing will end in Q3, and interest rate hikes will likely commence at the ECB’s 21 July policy meeting.  However, this year, the eurozone first-quarter growth was a measly 0.2 percent over the previous quarter. The war in Ukraine has directly affected energy supplies to EU economies, forcing many to seek alternative, and costlier, sources. With recession looming, be careful not to make significant investment decisions you might later regret. Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland.

The crypto slump has highlighted the risks posed by cryptocurrency as a speculative asset, but for professionals in finance, the immediate challenge is working out how best to account for it. Gavin Fitzpatrick and Mike O’Halloran dig into the details. Money, currencies and the methods by which people and businesses earn, store and exchange value have taken numerous forms throughout history.  The evolution of currency dates back many millennia, from the early days of bartering to modern methods, such as coins, notes, loans, bonds and promissory notes. Introduced in 2009 with the launch of Bitcoin, cryptocurrency is the latest evolution in this process. Despite a slow initial uptake, its popularity has risen dramatically in the past decade and, today, there are thousands of different cryptocurrencies in existence.  Views on their usefulness and longevity are somewhat fragmented, however. Investors who have been fortunate enough to acquire cryptocurrency at low prices sing its praises, whereas critics argue against its fundamentals and highlight the volatility of the cryptocurrency market. For companies and the accounting profession, however, the immediate challenge is working out how these assets should be accounted for. Here are some common questions worth bearing in mind. Is there a specific standard that accountants can apply to cryptocurrencies? In short, the answer here is no—nor do cryptocurrencies fit neatly into any existing standard. Accounting for cryptocurrencies at fair value through profit and loss may seem intuitive. However, such an approach is not compatible with IFRS requirements in most circumstances, as cryptocurrencies may not meet the definition of a financial instrument as per IAS 32.  Should cryptocurrencies be treated as another form of cash? IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows states that cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits. IAS 32 Financial Instruments Presentation notes that currency (cash) is a financial asset because it represents the medium of exchange. While cryptocurrencies are becoming more prevalent, they cannot be readily exchanged for all goods or services.  IAS 7 also considers cash equivalents—short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known cash amounts and subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Given the considerable price volatility in cryptocurrencies, entities have not sought to apply policies where they define holdings in crypto assets as cash or cash equivalents. In the absence of a specific standard, what guidance and methodologies can accountants follow when deciding how to account for these assets? In practice, accounting policies defined to deal with cryptocurrencies follow the principles of accounting for intangible assets or, in some cases, accounting for inventory.  Intangible assets IAS 38 Intangible Assets defines an intangible asset as “an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance”.  Identifiable – under IAS 38, an asset is identifiable if it “is capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged.” Cryptocurrency holdings can be traded and are, therefore, identifiable. Non-monetary – IAS 38 defines monetary assets as “money held and assets to be received in fixed or determinable amounts of money.” The value of a cryptocurrency is subject to major variations arising from supply and demand. As a result, its value is not fixed or determinable. Without physical substance – as a digital currency, cryptocurrencies do not have physical substance. As a result of applying the above logic, many companies classify holdings in cryptocurrencies as intangible assets. In line with IAS 38, companies can use one of two approaches to account for intangible assets: Cost – cryptocurrency asset is carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment. In applying this approach, companies must determine if the asset has a finite or indefinite useful life. Given that cryptocurrencies can act as a store of value over time, they have an indefinite useful life, meaning the asset would not be subject to an annual amortisation charge. Instead, an annual impairment review would be necessary. Revaluation – under IAS 38, intangible assets can be carried at their revalued amount as determined at the end of each reporting period. To adopt this approach, the asset must be capable of reliable measurement. While active markets are often uncommon for intangible assets, where cryptocurrencies are traded on an exchange, it may be possible to apply the revaluation model. In order to present increases and decreases correctly (i.e. determining how much is presented in other comprehensive income versus profit and loss), entities must be able to track movements in sufficient detail across their holdings. Establishing the cost of the crypto asset denominated in a foreign currency According to IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, entities will record holdings in cryptocurrencies using the spot exchange rate between functional currency and the cryptocurrency at the date of acquisition.  As noted earlier, cryptocurrencies are not considered to meet the definition of monetary items. Therefore, holdings in cryptocurrencies measured at historical cost in a foreign currency will be translated using the exchange rate at the initial transaction date. Holdings measured using the revaluation approach shall be translated using the exchange rate applied when the valuation was determined.  Inventory As demonstrated, holdings in cryptocurrencies can meet the definition of intangible assets under IAS 38. However, within the scoping section of IAS 38, it is noted that intangible assets held by an entity for sale in the ordinary course of business are outside the scope of the standard. This conclusion is drawn from the fact that such holdings should be accounted for under IAS 2 Inventories. While the default treatment, under IAS 2, is to account for inventories at the lower cost and net realisable value, the standard also states this treatment does not apply to commodity broker-traders.  Such traders are required, under IAS 2, to account for their inventory at fair value less cost to sell, with changes in value being recognised in profit and loss.  Intuitively, it may seem appropriate for entities holding cryptocurrencies to follow the same accounting applied by broker-traders under a business model that involves active buying and selling.  However, since cryptocurrencies do not have a physical form aligning their accounting to a scope exception for commodity traders, it is a judgment call.  In practice, where there is a business model under which crypto assets are acquired to sell in the short term and generate a profit from changes in price or broker margin, the treatment described here from IAS 2 for broker-dealers has been applied.  Other considerations  So far, we have explored accounting for holdings of cryptocurrencies (IAS 38) and trading in cryptocurrencies (IAS 2). The standards referenced are not new.  To date, the IASB has focused on aligning accounting for cryptocurrencies to existing guidance, and practice has developed accordingly. While there is clear logic to the policies developed from this approach, there are still challenges.  For example, while applying the cost model of IAS 38 is straightforward, the balance stated in the financials may be significantly different to the market value. On the other hand, applying the revaluation model of IAS 38 can be difficult from the point of view of tracking movements in value to determine how much is presented in profit and loss versus other comprehensive income.  What about custodians? As recently as March 2022, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released their Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121.  The bulletin provides guidance for reporting entities operating platforms allowing users to transact in cryptocurrencies, while also engaging in activities for which they have an obligation to safeguard customers’ crypto assets.  Until now, custodians may have concluded that they do not control the asset they safeguard. However, the SEC believes that stakeholders would benefit from the inclusion of a safeguarding liability and a related asset (similar to an indemnification asset), both measured at fair value. This guidance is applicable to reporting entities that apply US GAAP or IFRS in their SEC filings. These entities are expected to comply in their first interim or annual financial statements ending after 15 June 2022. While this requirement applies to SEC filings, it is an essential development to be aware of. Challenges ahead Accounting policies designed to deal with cryptocurrencies have developed, in practice, from existing standards. While these policies are grounded in fundamental accounting principles, there are challenges.  As cryptocurrencies continue to become more prevalent, some of the key assumptions in these policies will be challenged.  For example, if the price of cryptocurrencies becomes less volatile, this would challenge the conclusion that they meet the definition of non-monetary assets under IAS 38. Instead, with less price volatility, it could be argued that they meet the definition of cash equivalents.  Given the current challenges and ongoing development of cryptocurrencies, many are calling for standard-setters to engage in a dedicated project to address these issues.  Gavin Fitzpatrick is a Partner in Financial Accounting and Advisory Services at Grant Thornton.  Mike O’Halloran is Technical Manager in the Advocacy and Voice Department of Chartered Accountants Ireland.

Where can small businesses find the advice they need to keep growing? Trusted advisers, says Emma Jones.  My company solves problems for small businesses based on data sets and evidence that guides businesses from different localities and sectors to support that is proven to work for their peers. We shortcut a founder’s route to success through pointing them to the right intervention for their business, at the right time, boosting productivity by saving valuable hours searching for relevant advice.    One factor that has aided the move towards standardised and personalised advice is the number of businesses now operating on common platforms.  Take the e-commerce sector as an example: most online sellers use the same ‘stack’ of technologies, whether that is Big Commerce for sales, Facebook to drive advertising, or Google Analytics to measure results.  This means smart data companies can show a founder if they are selling more or less – or paying more or less for those sales – than competitors.  With insight in hand, a founder then wants advice on how to improve and get into the top tier of performers. Business owners want to simply be told ‘how’ and ‘where’ to spend their time and money. They are willing to share data on key company metrics in return for advice on how they can perform better.  This is where the role of trusted advisers comes in.  With a foundation of data, advisers can guide a business owner through a personalised support journey, with in-built accountability as the adviser takes on the role of a coach in setting out milestones for the business to deliver.  There is a key role for accountants in this as managing or raising money is integral to business progression. While we want to connect small business owners with the right support, we also want to connect them to the trusted experts who can help them to do the jobs that need to be done to spur growth.  Guiding business owners to make the right moves, based on data and insight, and connecting them to the right advisers can help to boost their efficiency, potentially delivering a similar benefit to the wider economy.  Emma Jones is Founder of Enterprise Nation.

The government’s new auto-enrolment scheme has been described as a ‘once-in-a-generation’ pension policy. Clare O’Sullivan examines how it will change our retirement  landscape. Andrew Glenn was 20 and an undergraduate studying in Adelaide when the Australian government’s Superannuation Guarantee (SG) came into effect in 1992, making it compulsory for employers to pay a percentage of their employees earnings into a retirement fund. In the three decades since, Glenn has become “passionate” about the scheme—dubbed the “Super”—which has, he says, created a positive culture around pension savings in Australia. “I remember when superannuation came in, I had a part-time job at university and, all of a sudden, I had money going into this separate retirement account. It wasn’t coming out of my pay. It was an additional payment, so, straight away, I felt good about it,” says Glenn. The idea behind the SG was that it would provide income in retirement for as many Australians as possible, substituting or supplementing the government pension. “There is definitely a mindset here now where people value their Super. It is pervasive throughout Australian culture and it can add up to quite a significant amount of money over time. If you are a home-owner, your Super would tend to be your second biggest asset, so people care about it,” says Glenn. Although not quite the same as Australia’s SG, the Automatic Enrolment Retirement Savings System announced recently by the Irish government has a similar aim to “build a culture” of saving for retirement, according to Minister for Social Protection, Heather Humphreys. Speaking in March at the announcement of the final design principles for the auto-enrolment regime, Humphreys described it as a “major reform” of the Irish pensions landscape. “It is intended not just to get people saving earlier, but to support them in that saving process by simplifying the pension choices and, importantly, by providing for significant employer and State contributions as well,” Humphreys said. Due to come into effect in 2024, the scheme will see some 750,000 workers enrolled automatically into a new workplace pension scheme with matching employer contributions and a state top-up. For every €3 saved by a worker, a further €4 will be credited to their pension savings account.  According to the Government, this means that, when the scheme is fully established, a worker earning €35,000 per annum will accumulate a fund (excluding investment returns) of €293,000 over their working life. Participation in the new scheme will be voluntary, however. Workers will have the ability to opt-out. Given the success of the Superannuation Guarantee in Australia, and the pension auto-enrolment systems since introduced in other countries, including Britain and New Zealand, the Irish scheme is expected to be a welcome addition to the pension landscape here. Although welcome, the government’s pension auto-enrolment scheme has been a long time coming, however.  “This goes back a long way. Pension policy in Ireland was first reviewed about 20 years ago and, today, we are the only OECD country that doesn’t yet operate an auto-enrolment or similar system as a means of promoting pension savings,” says Munro O’Dwyer, Partner, Pension Services, PwC Ireland. “In countries without such schemes, retirement savings tend to be quite low. In the UK, the introduction of an auto-enrolment system similar to that planned for Ireland doubled the rate of participation in private pension savings. The behavioural change was really quite significant. “If you dig further into the UK figures, you can see an even higher jump in the number of people in low-pay or low-security employment participating in private pension savings.  “We will see the same thing happening in Ireland once our auto-enrolment scheme is introduced, so, I think the benefit to society as a whole is really quite positive.”    Focus so far To date, much of the focus in Ireland has been on reducing future spending in the area of pensions, rather than working on incentives to increase private pension coverage, according to Miriam Donald, Public Policy Manager, Advocacy and Voice, Chartered Accountants Ireland. “This isn’t surprising given that the State Pension is the single biggest cost to the State in terms of benefits,” Donald says. Recent figures show that close to €6 billion was spent on the State Pension in 2020.  “This figure far exceeded the €4.5 billion spent on the COVID-19 Employment Wage Subsidy Scheme in the same year,” Donald says. Cultural shift As a result, the government has faced mounting pressure to change the “culture around pensions savings” in Ireland by introducing measures to encourage private pension coverage. “Recent studies show that life expectancy in Ireland is currently 90 years for men and 92.6 years for women,” says Donald. “This means workers, on average, will be retired for more than a quarter of their lives, with one third of the population depending solely on the State to fund their later years.” Figures released last year by the Central Statistics Office, meanwhile, showed that 34 percent of Irish workers had no pension coverage outside the State Pension. “The existing annual State Pension of some €13,000 might seem reasonable if you have paid off your mortgage, but Ireland’s home ownership rate in 2021 was reported to be 68.7 percent,” says Donald. “This means that many will pay high rents long after their peers own their own home and, with average annual rents lying north of €15,000 according to the Residential Tenancy Board’s 2021 rent index, sole reliance on the State Pension will not be sustainable.” Encouraging retirement savings By introducing auto-enrolment, Donald says the government has taken an important step in encouraging more people to save for their retirement over the course of their working lives. “At the moment, starting a pension requires taking an active decision to do so. The attraction of auto-enrolment is that, if a worker does nothing, a portion of their pay will automatically go into a pension fund,” she says. This means that the new scheme will overcome an existing barrier to pension savings whereby people simply overlook the need to put money aside for retirement over the course of their working lives, according to Donald. “Employees who do opt out after six months of being enrolled will be re-enrolled after two years, meaning private pension coverage could be increased considerably,” she says, “but the scheme also relies on behavioural inertia – i.e. trusting that some people will not get around to opting out of a pension scheme and will simply stay invested.” Challenges ahead Overall, Donald sees the introduction of auto-enrolment as a viable solution to increasing private pension coverage in Ireland. “It incentivises people to save, reduces the risk of people entering poverty in retirement and reduces the reliance on the State pension. Its introduction could even result in long-term savings for the State,” she says. Getting the scheme up-and-running by early 2024 will be challenging, however, according to Cróna Clohisey, Tax and Public Policy Lead at Chartered Accountants Ireland.  “A significant amount of work needs to be done—not just to develop the legislation underpinning the scheme, but also to finalise its design, and to establish the various mechanisms that will be required for it to function,” says Clohisey. As the legislation progresses, the government will need to work closely with businesses to advise and help them prepare for the introduction of automatic enrolment. Payroll providers, in particular, will face an uphill battle preparing for the planned introduction of the new scheme. “We know that this is going to be a considerable challenge for payroll providers to implement,” says Clohisey. “They are telling us that a lead-in time of at least 18 months would be required to properly develop, test, and deploy a fully operational system.  “January 2024 is not far away, and businesses will need time and guidance to get ready for this change. Sustained momentum will be needed to meet this ambitious timeline.” Central processing agency Jerry Moriarty, Chief Executive of the Irish Association of Pensions Funds, agreed that the planned introduction of the new scheme in early 2024 could give rise to significant challenges. “There is a huge amount to be done in a relatively short period of time, including the setting up of a central processing agency to do the job of auto-enrolling people—getting them on board and then dealing with all the administration that goes with making sure the contributions are passed on to the right investment managers,” he says. In the government’s favour is the fact that “we’ve been able to learn a lot from what’s happened with similar schemes in other countries,” Moriarty says. “In the UK, for example, the system focused on auto-enrolling employers rather than employees. That caused a huge problem with payroll systems, so they ended up having to phase in participation, starting with big employers.” Ireland’s new scheme will, by contrast, focus on auto-enrolling individual employees, Moriarty says. “It makes more sense because it means employers won’t have to deal with all of this extra admin and that, when people move from one employer to another, they won’t have to switch pension provider.”

The role of the charity director is an onerous one, but what about performance? David Brady considers the characteristics of an effective charity director, and future challenges and opportunities. The implementation in 2021 of the Charities Governance Code poses important questions for the effective governance of charity boards in Ireland, including the challenging, and occasionally sensitive, review of board performance and the performance of individual constituent directors.  Compliance with the Code is, however, a baseline measure of effectiveness. Beyond the legal requirements for directors under the Charities Act 2009 and the Companies Act 2014, the qualities, roles and responsibilities of the ideal charity director are largely undefined. Are charity directors different? Is being a director of a charity really that different to being a private sector director? Directors of charities and private sector directors have shared experience in overseeing the challenges: of recruiting, motivating, and retaining the right people; of there being sufficient funds to pay salaries; and of competitors in the same sub-sector.  There are also similarities in how the business of the board is conducted; the calendar of board meetings, sub-committee meetings, and annual general meeting; the annual audit; the risk register; and—increasingly common—evaluation of the board itself.  In both contexts, the chairperson is often selected for their relevant experience, ability to guide decisions or bring order in the face of complexity or challenge. There are, however, factors that are unique to charities, including: charities legislation and guidance from the Charities Regulator; compliance with the Charities Governance Code; a mixed-income revenue model, whereby funding is derived from a combination of restricted-purpose and unrestricted-purpose revenue sources; a volunteer, unpaid board of directors; staff members who may be unfamiliar with private sector/commercial work environments and practices; volunteers, who assist the organisation on an unpaid basis, but who may feel they have a stake/voice equivalent to employed members of staff or even board directors; functioning as public benefit entities, with accountability to end users and the public in general, and the fulfilment of a public-benefit purpose;  service-level agreements with funders. None of this makes life easy for the charity director and can be reason enough for some to shy away from holding board positions.  Nonetheless, there are many experienced and qualified people who wish to give something back to organisations that have positively impacted their lives or to causes aligned with their beliefs and values — often donating significant amounts of their time. How good is good? As noted above, the implementation of the Charites Governance Code has heightened awareness of governance standards in the sector and the importance of the role of the charity director in achieving these standards.  However, beyond meeting base-level compliance with the Code, the debate on how to define highly effective charity boards and directors, and their ability to impact on the success or effectiveness of their governed organisations, has yet to commence in earnest.  In this article, I propose a five-level model for evaluating charity boards in terms of their ‘maturity’ or otherwise (see Figure 1), from a non-compliant to an elite standard. I suggest applying the same model to the evaluations of individual directors. In devising and articulating this charity board maturity model, I considered the following: How mature is a charity board? What aspects of a board’s conduct define its maturity, or otherwise? What is the evidence of a board achieving the higher levels of maturity? For example, is it aware of charity sector challenges and opportunities in Ireland and internationally? What does this mean for director competencies and performance? Is it possible to connect board maturity with the related, distinctive competencies required of individual board members? Non-compliant boards typically have a negative attitude towards governance. They are often unaware of strategic developments within the sub-sector and have a short-term funding focus, relying on basic financial information and outdated policies and procedures. They have no board rotation or succession planning processes. Their AGM processes are weak, and they do not insist on the maintenance of a risk register. Compliant boards adopt a tolerant attitude to governance; however, strategically, they are largely closed to sector developments other than matters of self-interest. Their policies and risk register are compliant rather than effective; their rotation policy is not fully implemented, and the AGM is limited to board members only.   Effective boards see the benefits of good governance and revise board and staff structures to exploit opportunities. They seek funding opportunities to support strategy and use risk registers to manage risk and plan contingencies. They ensure that board appraisals and rotation of directors policies are implemented. AGMs include the attendance of, and participation by, non-board, external members of the charity.  Progressive boards seek continuous improvement in their governance of the organisation. They are keen to benchmark their maturity against the boards of peers. They seek collaboration in new initiatives that reflect market changes. Policies are updated in line with current business/market changes. The organisation’s risk appetite is determined and defined, and the board ensures that its skills gaps are identified and addressed. Board rotations are planned and implemented. Elite boards deliver strategic programmes resulting in significant impact and/or funding. Board members and staff have a collective problem-solving mindset. The charity’s performance is managed using both financial and non-financial KPIs. At the elite level, the board employs long-term resource planning, promotes a robust risk management culture, and reviews strategy regularly. Succession planning includes pro-active identification of new chair and board members, as well as key executive management positions. They embrace and learn from occasional failure positively. Benchmarking director performance As suggested, the five-levels of maturity model can be applied by analogy to the evaluation or benchmarking of individual board directors. The articulation of competencies, or rather their absence, of the ‘non-compliant’ director is straightforward.  They are unfamiliar with the sector or sector trends. They bring no valuable experience or expertise to the board, are unfamiliar with governance frameworks, and generally blame others for problems rather than take responsibility themselves. The compliant director has an up-to-date understanding of the charity, brings technical knowledge to the position, is familiar with the Charities Governance Code and brings governance oversight to the organisation.  Moving up a level, the effective director will have served previously on multiple charity boards and brings valuable experience. Other board members will be aware of their specialist knowledge and draw on their expertise to derive solutions for organisational issues.  Their awareness of internal and external stakeholders will be strong and their input to decision-making will reflect this. The progressive director is a strategic thinker. In addition to having specialist knowledge, they bring a strategic understanding of the niche in which the charity operates and its competitive advantages.  Their leadership qualities are also evident from previous directorships, and they are skilled in multiple business and/or charity sectors.  Accepting change as normal and necessary, a key characteristic is their desire to introduce innovations to the charity’s operations, particularly ideas that are working well in the commercial sector. Finally, the elite director provides economic, political, and social thought leadership to the charity, in addition to the strategic leadership attributes of the progressive director. They possess the qualities required to chair either the board or one of its sub-committees.  Through a broad network of private and public sector collaborators, they are well positioned to plan for the sustainability and growth of the charity.  They set the tone of communication within the board, between the board and the staff of the charity, and between the board and the sector and broader public arena. The style of the ‘elite’ charity director is, paradoxically, non-elitist, collaborative and influential, with an evident social purpose. What next for charity directors? As well as understanding the characteristics, competencies and behaviour of the ideal charity director, and applying these when evaluating boards and their individual members, there are several critical issues that pose important challenges and questions for the sector as a whole: Should there be mandatory term limits for holding the position of charity director and/or defined limits for the role of chairperson and secretary? Should charity directors be paid, and if so, in what circumstances, how much, and under what terms and conditions? How can more experienced businesspeople, qualified professionals and members of the public be encouraged to hold board positions in charities? What can the sector do to facilitate this? What training and development, beyond the compliance level, do charity directors need? Should mandatory, accredited training be introduced before board positions are offered and accepted? What can Irish charities learn from international experience and best practice regarding governance? Should the legislation be changed to make it easier to identify, caution, penalise or remove ineffective charity directors? The implementation of the Charities Governance Code has given an important boost to the raising of standards across the sector and the priority must be to ensure this happens promptly and comprehensively.  The extension of governance into territory beyond compliance is an exciting and challenging move with long-term benefits for all stakeholders.  Defining charity boards in terms of their maturity, from non-compliant through effective to elite, and evaluating director competencies by analogy, will serve to both challenge and develop a trusted and vibrant charity sector.   David Brady is a principal at DB Consulting.  (Views expressed in the article are strictly those of the author.)

As the need for Chartered Accountants grows, so does the shortage of available talent, says Dr Brian Keegan. If asked to describe an accountant, most business people these days would probably use the word “scarce.” Chartered Accountants are in demand perhaps as never before. One senior executive in the multinational sector damned the qualification with faint praise. He recently told me that he liked to hire Irish Chartered Accountants because they didn’t give him any trouble.  This misses the point. The shortage is not merely an island of Ireland phenomenon; it is a global issue. Contributing to a panel discussion on the topic at the International Federation of Accountants a few weeks ago, one of the panellists pointed to a simple reality: worldwide, more businesses are starting up than accountants are coming through the education process to service them.  Such entrepreneurial demands do not tell the full story, however. In the context of the destruction caused by the evil invasion of Ukraine, there is now a real possibility of a significant economic downturn in the western world.   Central banks are still trying to determine if the current surge in inflation is short-term, a result of supply chain disruption or a more systemic trend to be remedied by interest rate hikes.   As central banks, governments, and government agencies try to figure this one out, they continue to impose greater levels of reporting and regulatory requirements on businesses. One example is the drive towards environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is the biggest show in town for those in Ireland.   While the CSRD is still wending its way through the European institutions, it is clear that in the future at least five times more businesses will be required to report on ESG issues than is currently the case. These reports will also have to be assured.  The growing demand for qualified professional accountants is already evident in the rising number of students currently undergoing training with Chartered Accountants Ireland (though not necessarily in the figures of the other Irish accounting bodies).  This is partly down to our own marketing efforts and the training firms that continue to attract the vast majority of new entrants to the profession. However, supply chains of talent are more challenging to build than the supply chains of goods.   It will be critical to sustain this training momentum because some of the capacity issues we are currently experiencing are down to a fall-off in new entrants during the most recent recession.   If we continue to attract new talent into the profession, positioning the relevance of the accountant’s role in modern society really matters.   Although ESG reporting presents a capacity challenge, it also presents an opportunity to develop capacity. Assuring corporate sustainability achievements will be an attractive way to build a career for some new entrants. Yet, the European institutions framing the CSRD do not seem to have recognised this reality. On the contrary, at the time of writing, there are even suggestions that the “traditional” auditor would be precluded from providing assurance services on ESG matters.    It is hard to refute this argument without sounding self-serving. Nevertheless, without the participation of a vibrant accountancy profession, there will be no coherent reporting or assurance on ESG – and that is not in anyone’s interest. In the meantime, we will have to address the capacity issues, not just with the usual blandishments of good wages and attractive conditions for new students, but by facilitating the participation in the Irish market of accountants qualified elsewhere. Effectively doing so will be down to all of us – the Institute, firms and regulators alike. Dr Brian Keegan is Director of Advocacy and Voice at Chartered Accountants Ireland.

As demand for professionals in accountancy and finance continues to heat up, salaries are on the rise and flexibility is top of the agenda for candidates, writes Arlene Harris. Despite rising inflation and predictions of impending recession, “good accountants will always be in demand” and, as companies shrug off pandemic restraints and begin to plan ahead once again, the need for professionals in all areas of finance is on the rise. So says Trayc Keevans, Global FDI Director at Morgan McKinley Ireland. “We are in a market like no other, rich with opportunity. It is one of the best times I can remember for accountancy professionals living and working in Ireland,” said Keevans.  Businesses emerging from under the cloud of COVID-19 are being “more intentional” in their hiring for accountancy and finance positions, according to Keevans. “I think this is why we are seeing so much demand in the market. In some instances, companies have been focusing their efforts mainly on surviving the pandemic by ensuring that the accounts were prepared and controls in place. They were really paying attention to very little beyond that,” she said. “Now, they are hiring again—some with a preference for finance professionals with data skills, because financial planning and analysis (FP&A) is seen as providing business intelligence that can help shape the way forward for companies.” The pandemic has also brought about a shift in the perspectives and preferences of candidates in the profession. “The pandemic really made for a much more competitive market, because employees had more time to evaluate their current positions, to think carefully about the level of flexibility they wanted in their working lives, and the direction they wanted their careers to take,” said Keevans. As recruitment moved online, the virtual hiring process also became faster and more agile. “All of these factors have combined to contribute to the record movement of professionals—particularly in the past 18 months,” Keevans said.  In response, she said companies had been adopting “all manner” of retention stratagems to keep talent on board. “Some of this focus has been on compensation and benefits. The culture of counter-offers is at an all-time high, and this has brought about the need for companies to be more agile in all things pay- and perk-related.” As a result, demand for payroll professionals is particularly high at the moment. “We have seen a number of companies that had previously outsourced to payroll bureaus opting to bring this function back in-house,” said Keevans. “This has created significant demand for payroll specialists, not just with EMEA and MNC experience, but also with experience in indigenous organisations.” In addition to compensation and benefits, employers are also responding to changing attitudes to work-life balance and remote working among candidates post-pandemic. “As long as the demand for accountancy talent outweighs supply, we will see professionals continuing to vote with their feet,” said Keevans. “Any company that isn’t offering any form of hybrid working can expect to see their talent pipeline reduced by up to 80 percent based on current market demands. “The preference in the market is for two to three days in the office and the remainder remote.” Some professionals are taking the demand for greater flexibility even further, challenging employers to adopt a more innovative approach to remote working policies. “We’re starting to see talent challenging the flexibility offered by their employer to include working from locations overseas for a number of weeks of the year,” said Keevans. “This trend is still in its infancy and employers are being understandably cautious in assessing the risks and fairness of such an approach before agreeing to any request.  “They are aware that doing so would need to be referenced within the company’s policy documents on the scope of the hybrid/remote working offering.” Employers are showing greater flexibility in other ways too – recruiting more candidates with experience in sectors other than those they operate in. “Until there is a levelling in demand and supply, we expect to see continued flexibility on the part of employers regarding the sectoral experience they are likely to be flexible on when hiring new recruits,” said Keevans. “As it stands, we have seen employers in all sectors showing flexibility in this regard, with the exception of manufacturing, construction and to some extent, pharmaceutical.” Starting salaries Starting salaries for newly qualified accountants are currently averaging €60,000, up from €55,000 this time last year, while part-qualified accountants can expect to earn about €45,000 annually. “The single biggest area of demand we’re seeing right now is for Big Four newly qualified accountants, as well as those with two to three years’ post-qualified experience in multinationals,” said Keevans. Demand for newly qualified accountants is high in both industry and financial services, as is demand for internal auditors and risk professionals, financial analysts, and accounts payable and receivable. Among tax professionals, the highest demand among employers is for candidates at managerial and senior managerial level. “Here, professionals with five years’ qualified experience are securing salaries of between €80,000 and €90,000 plus benefits. That’s up from a range of €70,000 to €75,000 up to 12 months ago,” said Keevans. “The growth in the number of FDI multinationals setting up here, and wishing to have an in-house tax function, is a driving factor—as are the retention incentives the bigger firms are putting in place to retain their tax talent.”   Keevans said there had been a significant shift from contract to permanent recruitment in the market, a trend she expects will continue in the 12 months ahead.   “As the market starts to open back up, we hope to see more mobility in terms of talent coming into the country,” she said. “This would be welcome as a means to alleviate some of the pressure on the supply of accountancy professionals, particularly in the transactional space. “It is important here for companies to consider the potential to sponsor talent to get employment permits and visas, where required, before going to market to hire. This will help to ensure as broad a talent pool as possible, accessible in the most efficient timelines.”

Pat O’Neill outlines his priorities for the year ahead, including the need to increase the supply of accounting talent nationwide and reach out to members globally post-pandemic.  As Pat O’Neill begins his term as President of Chartered Accountants Ireland, his driving focus will be on tackling the ongoing capacity constraints facing the profession. Speaking at his election by members at the Institute’s 134th AGM in Dublin recently, O’Neill pointed to the urgent need to address the ongoing shortage of critical accountancy skills in the Irish labour market. “Despite the recent and current challenges of the pandemic and the re-emergence of significant inflationary pressures, the economy continues to grow,” O’Neill told attendees at the AGM on Friday, 20 May.  “Our economic pillars of large-scale foreign direct investment and successful domestic business require appropriate levels of accounting talent, both within their organisations and also in the accounting profession upon which they rely for their transactional and regulatory compliance needs.”  Despite this fundamental need, however, the reliable supply of accounting talent continued to be disrupted by structural issues requiring urgent action, O’Neill said. “If we don’t work hard to tackle significant issues facing accounting supply in this country relating to education, qualifications and permits, this ongoing shortage could have a significant impact on businesses here, both indigenous and FDI, potentially harming the wider economy in the future.” Second-level syllabus One of the primary factors impeding the supply of accounting talent nationwide is the accounting syllabus at secondary level. “The syllabus was introduced over 25 years ago,” said O’Neill.  “Not only does this mean that our students are being taught material and concepts, which are now somewhat obsolete, but the syllabus also does little to introduce our young people to the breadth of what the modern accountant’s role actually is—and how they add value to businesses, the economy, and society as a whole.”   It is crucial that the syllabus be reviewed, refreshed, and made “truly fit for purpose” in the 21st century, O’Neill said.   “Without this, students will be deterred from pursuing further studies and a career in accounting due to a fundamental misunderstanding of what accountancy involves and the career opportunities and choices it provides,” he said.  “Another consequence is that we have an insufficient number of students emerging from second level through third level and into professional qualifications. Ultimately, this means Ireland won’t have enough ‘bench-strength’ to support Irish businesses—but, thankfully, it is within our power to create positive change now.”   Departmental submission The Institute, under the auspices of the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies-Ireland, last year made a submission on this matter to the Department of Education, including the findings of its accounting syllabus review.   “The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment has published its Report on its Senior Cycle Review and, whilst we are heartened that reform of the senior cycle is now recognised as necessary, the pace of change is just too slow,” O’Neill said.   “It has taken four years to reach this stage and it will likely be 2027 by the time we see changes coming through in the first tranche of subjects, which are still to be determined.  “Unfortunately, during this time, the issues facing Irish businesses in terms of the lack of supply of accounting talent are only likely to worsen.”  As it stands, the accountancy profession is already included on the Government’s Critical Skills Occupations List.  Compiled by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, the list catalogues professions required for the proper functioning of the economy, which are being impacted by a shortage of qualifications, experience or skills. The Northern Ireland Executive has also listed accountancy as an in-demand skill north of the border. Recognition of qualifications In addressing the capacity issue, O’Neill also referenced the need to ensure that the needs of business and the profession are met through the adequate recognition of qualifications. With more than 30 years’ experience as an audit partner with EY, he has significant involvement at board level with many plcs, providing insight and best practice guidance regarding boards’ risk and corporate governance agendas. “In the Republic, a substantial amount of the work required for the audit qualification must be statutory audit work,” O’Neill said. “This means that, despite students spending a significant amount of their training supporting US FDI businesses with their US reporting requirements—and with much of this controls work also used in the statutory audits of Irish subsidiaries—it will not count towards qualification. “The same goes for experience gained in auditing UK subsidiaries by students based in the Republic. The Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment and the Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority (IAASA) must be involved in finding a solution to this situation.” Sourcing overseas talent O’Neill noted that, as a growing economy, if Ireland cannot source sufficient accounting capacity at home, we must ensure that we do all we can to attract candidates with the necessary skills from other countries. “It is my steadfast belief that people and businesses achieve great things when they come together and that diversity of background and thought is key to any profession,” he said. “I benefited from my own upbringing from an early age in Shannon, Co. Clare, which was at the time perhaps a uniquely multinational community in the regions. “Early in my career in audit, I moved from Dublin to the UAE where I spent some time working in Dubai in the early nineties. I was thrown in at the deep end and had the opportunity to work with some companies over there that followed US accounting rules.   “That experience turned out to be incredibly useful for me professionally for many reasons, not least because—when I returned to Dublin in 1995—Ireland’s tech boom had begun and indigenous companies like CBT, Smartforce, Iona, and Trintech, were listing on the Nasdaq.  “The experience I had gained working with those companies in Dubai following US accounting rules was suddenly invaluable, so I know first-hand just how important experience gained in other jurisdictions can be in our career.” Chartered Accountants Ireland has been working closely with the government in recent months to promote the need to reduce application processing times for Critical Skills Employment Permits granted to accountants from outside the European Economic Area who have been hired to work here.  “The improvement now coming through in the processing time for such permits as a result has seen wait times reduced to six to eight weeks from as high as four months,” said O’Neill.  “Now, however, we must retain—and even improve upon—these shorter processing times to attract the right talent.” Northern Ireland Protocol  O’Neill highlighted the need for certainty and stability in the wake of the most recent Assembly Elections amid ongoing disagreement on the Northern Ireland Protocol.  “The Protocol remains a subject of debate now more than ever, and there is no doubt that challenges exist, but predictability and certainty are key for business and the economy in Northern Ireland,” he said.  “The Institute was an early advocate for the unique benefits of the Protocol for businesses located in Northern Ireland.  “We have almost 5,000 members there, and it is incumbent upon us to convey the positive feedback the Institute has received regarding the unique market access they have into both Britain and the EU.” Power of connection Now that the worst of the COVID-19 restrictions are behind us, O’Neill stressed the need for greater connection and acknowledged the crucial role played by the Institute in supporting a global network and helping to forge valuable professional and personal connections among members the world over.  “The benefit of networking to our 30,000+ members, and the critical importance of the physical interaction of our students, cannot be understated,” he said.    “We will continue to work towards a return of our networking events to pre-pandemic levels to the extent we can over the coming year. We have been highly successful in our innovations in training, and ability to shift to examining our students remotely through the pandemic.   “Through the Institute’s Education Department, and in conjunction with our training firms, we will be looking at how to achieve a balanced blend of online and physical learning delivery in the future to facilitate this interaction.”  O’Neill is a longstanding member of the Institute who has served on the Council of Chartered Accountants Ireland since 2014. He is a former Chair of the Institute’s Audit, Risk and Finance Board, and a former Chair of its Leinster Society.   “The importance of the Institute and our District Societies both here, across the Island of Ireland, and abroad in connecting—and now reconnecting—our members is not lost on me,” said O’Neill.  “I have benefited enormously from my membership over the years, and during my Presidency, my hope is that I can give back to the Institute and to all of our members whose commitment is so highly valued.” Global membership Established in 1888, Chartered Accountants Ireland today represents more than 30,000 members in over 90 countries and has responsibility for educating 7,000 students.   The Institute’s objective is to create opportunities for members and students, and ethical, sustainable prosperity for society.   It is a founding member of Chartered Accountants Worldwide, the international network of over one million Chartered Accountants. It also plays key roles in the Global Accounting Alliance, Accountancy Europe, and the International Federation of Accountants.     “The Institute is here to serve our members and students and I feel privileged to be able to support this effort in my role as President,” said O’Neill.  

Chartered Star Fiona Smiddy was inspired to set up her sustainable business by a life-changing trip that gave her a new perspective on the world.  It was during a five-month career break in 2018, spent traveling from Colombia and Panama on to Australia and New Zealand, that Fiona Smiddy hit upon the idea for her own business—an eco-friendly venture that would help people shop more sustainably. “I remember I was on this hilltop in Medellín in Colombia, and I looked down and saw this little kid who was flying what looked like a kite. I realised as I was looking at him that it wasn’t a kite. It was a plastic shopping bag attached to a string,” said Smiddy. “I thought how lucky we are in Ireland with the economy we have, the opportunities and the climate. A lot of us can buy what we need. When you visit countries where people have so much less in so many ways, you realise just how much it matters to try to make a difference.” A Chartered Accountant, Cork-born Smiddy is the founder of Green Outlook, an ethical retailer selling eco-friendly skin, hair, and personal care products online at greenoutlook.ie. Smiddy runs the business from Rathangan, Co. Kildare, stocking products from close to 40 sustainable brands, including Daughters of Flowers, Janni Bars, Moo & Yoo, Oganicules and Sophie’s Soaps.  Each has been selected to help visitors to the site shop consciously. Many of the products are plastic-free, and all are made with natural ingredients and sustainably sourced, the majority in Ireland. “I set up the business after I came home after traveling. I took over a website that was already up-and-running. The founders were leaving Ireland and I wanted to get started as quickly as possible,” said Smiddy. “I did a whole rebrand, started my own social media channels and really worked on promotion and publicity, building awareness and bringing more brands on board.” Her work with Green Outlook has earned Smiddy the title of 2022 Chartered Star. Awarded in April by Chartered Accountants Ireland, the designation recognises outstanding work in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).    As this year’s Chartered Star, Smiddy will now represent Ireland’s Chartered Accountancy profession at the One Young World summit in Manchester in September.  “My background in accountancy has been a huge help to me in getting my company off the ground. Once I knew that my future was going to be in sustainable business, I had this knowledge to hand right from the get-go, even down to simple things like filing VAT returns.  “I have been able to self-fund Green Outlook. I didn’t take anything out of the business for the first 18 months. I kept reinvesting and I think the financial knowledge I had really helped me to understand how important that was and get off to the right start.”  Recognising the important role Chartered Accountants can play in helping to combat the climate crisis, Chartered Star entrants must demonstrate how they are working towards, supporting, or living the values of any of the 17 UN SDGs.   Commenting on Smiddy’s win this year, Barry Dempsey, Chief Executive of Chartered Accountants Ireland, commended her “passion and commitment.” “As a profession and an Institute, we are fortunate and proud to be represented on the international stage by Fiona,” Dempsey said. “She follows in the footsteps of other Chartered Stars who have demonstrated passion and commitment in applying the skills and knowledge of the Chartered Accountancy profession to trying to address just some of the issues that the climate crisis presents.”  

As the recently appointed Vice-Chair of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), Sue Lloyd will play a key role in paving the way for a “global baseline” for reliable ESG investment criteria. Elaine O’Regan talks to the New Zealand-born former IASB Vice-Chair about what lies ahead in her new role.  Prior to taking up your role with the ISSB, you were Vice-Chair of the International Accounting Standards Board for six years. Looking back on it, what do you see as your most significant achievements in that role? Completing the international IFRS Standard for insurance contracts was definitely a high point, and also chairing the IFRS Interpretations Committee from 2017 to 2022, and making it more responsive. What does your appointment as Vice-Chair of the International Sustainability Standards Board mean to you professionally? How important do you think the work of the ISSB will be, and your role in it? I see this appointment as a really exciting opportunity for me professionally. Corporate reporting is at a real turning point where we are embracing the need for the broadest set of information about sustainability, risks and opportunities to help investors make informed decisions. I am really excited and honoured to be part of that process. The ISSB has a pivotal role to play in bringing more comparability and quality to reporting on sustainability risks around the world and building a more efficient system, both for the preparers, providing the information, and also for the investors consuming them. One of my key roles as Vice-Chair of the Board is to bring to bear the standard-setting approach of the IASB. My technical skills from that world, and my knowledge of financial reporting, will help me to bring that rigor to sustainability reporting for investors. How will the ISSB’s approach to standard-setting emulate or differ from that of the IASB? How will the two bodies coalesce and work together in the future? There will be a lot of similarity with the IASB, particularly in relation to due process and the thoroughness in which we approach our work. The ISSB wants to be really inclusive and build on the viewpoints of our stakeholders. We have that in common with the IASB. Obviously, the subject matter is different. Sustainability is a more nascent area of reporting, so we will have to work more closely with our ecosystem and really work with assurers and specialists in sustainability to build this new infrastructure for reporting. The ISSB is a sister board to the IASB, and that is great because it means we are part of the same foundation. It gives us the unique ability to sit together and work out the package of information we are asking for to meet investor needs, and to make sure that the reporting and the financial statements fit well together. When the IFRS talks about the ISSB establishing a “global baseline of sustainability standards” what does this mean, and why is it important for the ESG agenda globally? When we talk about a global baseline, what we really want to do is establish a set of disclosures that are sufficient to meet the needs of investors—to enable them to understand how sustainability, risks and opportunities affect the value of a company’s shares and its debt.  We want to provide a ‘set of information’ on companies around the world so that investors can make decisions based on consistent and comparable data. That is really what a global baseline means. It will happen in practice through a combination of two different mechanisms. One will be adoption or incorporation into the regulation in different countries, so that it becomes part of the mandatory reporting system for jurisdictions, in the same way that the IASB’s accounting standards have been mandated by jurisdictions around the world.  Complementing this, we expect there to be a lot of voluntary application of the standards, separate to the regulatory element, because this is a good way for preparers to understand what information is relevant to meet investor needs.   Tell us about the ISSB’s four core pillars – governance, strategy, risk management and metrics. How relevant is each one in the context of your overall mission? Our overall objective is to make sure that investors have the information they need to understand the effects of sustainability risks and opportunities on enterprise values, share price and the value of a company’s debt.  Our pillars are the prism we use to gather sustainability information from four different perspectives. One is how a company governs its risks, and how it is managing those risks and building them into its business strategy. We also look at the metrics they use to assess where they are now, to set their targets for the future and measure their progress in meeting their targets. This ‘package of information’ is designed to meet the investor’s needs, and, importantly, it is designed to encourage companies to think about how they govern and manage risks. How will the work of the ISSB support and help investors in respect of good environmental, social and governance (ESG) practice? What other ‘ESG stakeholders’ will benefit from your work? We know that there are different parties who are interested in information about sustainability, not just investors. We want to facilitate the provision of information to all of them. We want to make this an efficient reporting system for public policy purposes and for broader stakeholder groups beyond investors, for example. One of the aspects that we are focusing on here is what we call the “building block” approach.   This means that, when we are building our requirements, we have investors’ needs in mind, but we also want to make sure that others can add specific investor requirements onto our disclosures to meet broader needs. If we can avoid the need to have one set of disclosures for investors and a completely separate set for broader stakeholders, it is more efficient for those preparing the information. Tell us about the first draft ISSB standards, published in April. What do these draft standards provide for, how is the consultation process progressing and what will the next steps be? There are two documents. The first is the General Requirements Exposure Draft, which sets out the overarching requirements for what should be provided for in sustainability reporting.  It asks companies to provide information about all of their significant sustainability risks and opportunities relevant to enterprise value assessment.  It also sets out some other general ideas—for example, the fact that you should be able to understand how this information relates to the financial statements and the proposal that this information be provided at the same time as the financial statements. The second document is the Climate Exposure Draft, which sets out what specific disclosures should be provided by a company about climate risks and opportunity. This means that, if a company using the General Requirements Exposure Draft identifies climate risks and opportunities as a “significant” sustainability-related risk and opportunity, they can turn to the Climate Exposure Draft to find out what disclosures to provide.  That document is asking for information about the physical risks of climate change the company is exposed to—flood risk, for example—but also opportunities arising from climate change. If a company has developed a product, which may become more popular because of climate change, investors may want to hear about that as much as they would climate-related risk.  These drafts are out for comment until 29 July, 2022. Once we get the feedback, we will decide what we need to adjust, what we can keep as is, and then we will move on to the final requirements. How do you foresee the “roadmap” of additional draft standards rolling out beyond these first two? What standards are next on the agenda for consultation and what is the anticipated timeline for their introduction? Our next step will be to ask our stakeholders what they think we should prioritise after the General Requirements Exposure Draft and Climate Exposure Draft documents are approved.  We only have so much time, and the same is true for our stakeholders, so it is important to us to ascertain where the greatest needs lie. In other words, it is really up to the stakeholders to decide what we work on next. How will the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) build on work already carried out by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)? Our four core pillars (governance, strategy, risk management and metrics) are taken straight from TCFD recommendations, and they form the backbone of the proposals we have out for comment.  We have incorporated their structure and the climate disclosures included in the TCFD have been incorporated into our Climate Exposure Draft. We have built on SASB materials in two ways. Industry-based requirements in the appendix to the Climate Exposure Draft are taken from SASB’s industry-based standards.  We took the climate-related metrics and included those in the Climate Exposure Draft as part of the mandatory climate disclosures.  We are asking stakeholders to use SASB guidance to help them meet their disclosure requirements in the General Requirements Exposure Draft up until the time we draft more specific disclosure requirements of our own. How do you foresee the ISSB working alongside, and collaborating with, other standard-setting and regulatory bodies and initiatives like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG)? Having our proposals out for comment at the same time as the SEC and EFRAG proposals means that we have a unique opportunity to compare and contrast these different proposals and bring as much commonality as we can to our requirements. In an ideal world, we want to work together to build this global baseline and ensure as much consistency as possible with the SEC, EFRAG, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and others.  We have a Working Group tasked with doing so with the US, Europe and also China, Japan and the UK. We are encouraging our stakeholders to write to the SEC and to let the commission know if they think that the global baseline is important.  The GRI is also very important and is a really good example of the ‘building block’ process that I described earlier.  We have a Memorandum of Understanding with GRI. One of our aims is to work together to form a global baseline we both agree on to meet investor needs and to encourage GRI to add the additional pieces of information to meet the broader information needs.

Excel is a staple of many finance departments, but is it still fit-for-purpose? Mark Jenkins suggests it’s time to put the spreadsheets away and explore data management. In a world filled with cutting-edge technology and tools designed to maximise efficiencies, it’s surprising to find that many finance teams are still highly reliant on static spreadsheets. For too long, they have been held back by time-consuming, laborious administration standing in the way of opportunities to reshape their roles and drive progress in their industry. This valuable time could be spent exploring business strategy or expanding the financial knowledge and expertise that could open further doors to growth and innovation. The time for this shift to happen is now, but it will only possible be possible if finance professionals take charge and become true proponents of tech innovation.  Stuck on the spreadsheet treadmill Excel is deeply engrained in the culture of many finance departments. It is seen as a ‘safe’ and familiar tool, so why change it? Spreadsheets owe their ubiquity to the reluctance in many organisations to spend on innovative tools and processes. It can be hard to say goodbye to the only business analytics tool you have ever known. And, you do have to hand it to Excel. It is great for rudimentary calculations. Its shortcomings in today’s global and interconnected financial ecosystem are now more obvious than ever. In a world increasingly driven by collaboration and information-sharing, Excel is simply not up to the job of providing the multi-user support and complex, real-time data analytics needed for successful financial modelling and forecasting. There is also a crucial aspect of security, which Excel does not help to support. In a recent survey we conducted, 34 percent of finance leaders we questions said unsaved spreadsheets and lost documents posed the highest risk in their role. In light of this, it is perhaps time for organisations to prioritise data integrity and move away from outdated tools. It’s time to reassess the values High dependency on legacy processes is also hindering the strategic potential of finance leaders and their teams. MHR’s survey found that 44 percent of leaders are left out of business strategy conversations, as they find themselves overwhelmed with bulky manual processes. These processes waste time and stop skilled and talented finance professionals from realising their potential and proving their value to the business. This legacy mindset seems thoroughly at odds with the digital transformation happening across all industries. If finance leaders want to enable the data analytics revolution, they must leave Excel in the past and embrace smarter tools. Automation will combat stagnation As organisations accelerate digital transformation, finance teams need more suitable and easier ways of processing data. By implementing agile and collaborative scenario-planning solutions, they can seamlessly plan and model for the future, allowing them to use insights to shape longer-term business strategies. This is where automation comes in, offering a golden key to future-proofed finance operations. Through automation, professionals can free up time to undertake more business-critical endeavours and provide forward-thinking strategic advice at board level. Automated processes support teams in boosting their compliance, accuracy, and data security—considerably lightening the load. With a fit-for-purpose and integrated corporate performance management solution, financial teams can open themselves up to a whole new world of possibilities. With the reality of much greater agility and improved efficiencies, it is time finance teams close their Excel spreadsheets for good and look towards a brighter tech-enabled future. Mark Jenkins is Chief Finance Officer at MHR International

The Keynesian financial philosophy of deficit spending and government manipulation of economic activity has been popular, but does it still hold up post-pandemic, asks Brian S. Wesbury. Intellectuals and politicians often try to summarise or justify conventional thinking in pithy ways. Milton Friedman (in 1965) and Richard Nixon (in 1971) both used different versions of the phrase: “We are all Keynesians now.” John Maynard Keynes, one of the most famous economists of all time, supported deficit spending and government manipulation of economic activity, and Friedman and Nixon were both referring to the Great Society redistribution programs and the inflationary monetary policy designed to offset their cost. If economic policy was Keynesian in the 1960s and 1970s, as policymakers moved away from free market ideology, we are certainly all Keynesians now. COVID-19 spending and monetary policy are a clear continuation of this economic thinking. It all began in 2008 when the Bush and Obama administrations spent $1.5 trillion in taxpayer money to “rescue” the US economy, and the Federal Reserve (Fed) began quantitative easing (QE). That blueprint of policy response to the Panic of 2008 was used to respond to COVID-19 shutdowns. This time, the US Federal Government borrowed at least $5 trillion to spend, and the Fed increased its balance sheet by over $4.5 trillion. As a result of the Keynesian policies of the 1970s, the US experienced stagflation (slow growth and high inflation) – with both unemployment and inflation peaking in the double digits. Currently, inflation in the US is 8.1 percent, and the unemployment rate is 3.6 percent. So, while inflation is clearly happening, signs of stagflation are harder to find. This doesn’t mean economic growth isn’t being impacted. Multiple factors need to be analysed and untangled to fully understand the ramifications of lockdowns and government largesse. First, the US economy was artificially boosted by borrowing money and distributing it through government loans and pandemic benefits. Second, the US M2 money supply (measure of the money supply that includes cash, checking deposits, and easily-convertible near money) has increased more than 40 percent since February 2020, as the Fed renewed QE and monetised deficit spending. In other words, a great deal of that spending was paid for out of thin air. The impact of these policies was like giving morphine to an accident victim. The lockdowns dramatically damaged the economy, but the morphine masked the pain. All that pain-killer stimulus boosted sales and profits. This year, without new spending legislation—and, asؙ the Fed starts to reverse course, the economy will lose its morphine drip. On the surface, this suggests that the economy could be in trouble, but this ignores the impact of the third factor at play—its reopening. At least to me, it is clear that generous pandemic unemployment benefits had a massive impact on employment. In fact, the “Great Resignation” has had a lot to do with these benefits. While it was never the case, many thought the Build Back Better (BBB) spending bill would keep the money coming. Now that BBB appears dead, those people are heading back to work. In the first three months of 2022, 1.69 million jobs in the US have been filled, and this year will likely total four million jobs or more. So, even though the Fed will be lifting rates and Keynesian deficits will fall, the economy will expand in 2022, and profits should continue to rise. Unfortunately, we forecast that real GDP growth in the US will remain at less than three percent while inflation remains above five percent. This is reminiscent of the 1970s and, once society reopens fully following COVID-19 lockdowns, the full impact of these policies will be felt. The recent inversion in the yield curve suggests the bond market thinks that, if the Fed lifts short-term rates to three percent or so, it will be forced to cut rates again. This may be true, but we think inflation will prove a more persistent problem than the Fed or the bond market has priced in. The US is now stuck in a Keynesian dilemma of its own making, and the way out is to cut spending, cut tax rates, cut regulation, and tighten money enough to stop inflation. Because in the end, Keynesian policies don’t create wealth; free and open markets do. Brian S. Wesbury is Chief Economist at First Trust Global Portfolios.  This article represents the views of the author. This article was first published on FM Report.

Despite the hybrid working model being in swing for a few months now, we’re still trying to find the right balance. Moira Dunne has six tips to help nurture a fulfilling work-life balance in a hybrid environment. The hybrid working model offers great flexibility for employees and employers. However, this is a new way of working for many and will take time to settle down. We all want the best of both worlds, but how can we achieve a good work-life balance in a hybrid world? Here are six tips to help find balance and get the most out of days at home and in-office. Tip 1: Plan for both locations Start by getting a hybrid working planner or using your online calendar. On the Friday before the week ahead, decide when you will travel into the office, when you will work from home and, crucially, the reason why in each case. Do you have a meeting you must attend in person? Office day. Do you need to do deep work with no interruptions? Home day. Tip 2: Set weekly priorities Having clear priorities each week will help you complete tasks and optimise your time. A planner will help you to think about the key objectives you need to deliver on each week. This will allow you to find time for important things during a busy week and protect your time when unexpected tasks and work requests pop up. Tip 3: Have a routine working at home Aim to start and finish at the same time each day, whether you are in the office or at home. This will help you to kick-start each day and switch off in the evening. Set start and stop times will also give structure to your days when working at home. Over time, your work-from-home routine will become a habit, meaning you have one less decision to make. Tip 4: Use a shutdown checklist Just like you make a list to start your day, you need one to shut it down. Make a list of the tasks you need to complete in your working day. This will help clear work thoughts and separate your personal life from your work life. Here are some ideas for these routines, but it is important to develop your own with activities that suit you. Shutdown routine Recap your to-do list. Plan for tomorrow. Mute/hide work devices. Use a personal browser/device in the evening. Tip 5: Reset during the day Our energy levels go through highs and lows throughout the day. Tune into this and take control of your day by taking a reset break when you need it. Take the time to make that cup of tea or coffee. Even 60 seconds between activities will help you to reflect, recharge and reset before the next task or meeting. Tip 6: Review and improve This is a new way of working, so it is important to review each week and ask yourself two questions: What is working? What is not working? Once you’ve answered those questions, you can decide what can be improved and how you can improve it. What can you do differently next week to make your working time more productive? You can do this on your own, but it can also be beneficial to do it with your colleagues and team leader. Moira Dunne is Founder of beproductive.ie.

With demand for electricity expected to double by 2030, renewable sources will be key to decarbonising Ireland’s energy sector, writes Laragh Musselwhite. The decarbonisation of our electricity system has been one of Ireland's great success stories. Emissions from electricity generation in Ireland fell by 51.4 percent from 2001 to 2020.   This sizeable drop reflects improvements in the energy efficiency of modern gas-fired power plants as well as the increased share of renewables in the electricity system here.  The government has set ambitious targets for the ongoing roll-out of renewable energy generating capacity, including five gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030. Given that demand for electricity is expected to rise by anywhere from 19 to 50 percent over the next decade, meeting these targets will not be without challenge. Electricity in the Climate Action Plan The Climate Action Plan identifies the energy and electricity sector as a key enabler to Ireland meeting our Net Zero goal by 2050. The plan sets out an overall target of reducing carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) emissions in the sector to between two to four mega tonnes of CO2eq by 2030. Our most significant challenge is, however, the rapidly rising demand for electricity across Ireland. In a high-demand scenario, our electricity needs are expected to as much as double by 2030. At the same time, our electricity emissions need to be reduced by 60–80 percent. Renewable energy Renewable energy will be key to decarbonising the sector. In 2020, electricity generated from renewable sources accounted for 42.1 percent of all electricity generated in Ireland — up from 33.3 percent in 2018. Ireland has significant renewable energy resources, with wind energy accounting for 36 percent of the country's electricity in 2020. We currently have an installed wind capacity of 4.2 megawatts, and the Climate Action Plan commits to increasing this to 13 gigawatts of combined onshore and offshore wind by 2030. The generation opportunity Alongside large-scale renewables, microgeneration and small-scale generation have an important role to play in empowering and driving engagement and participation. Both create opportunities for domestic, community, farming, and small commercial customers to take the first steps towards investment in renewable technologies, potentially helping to shape electricity demand and decarbonise homes and businesses. The Climate Action Plan also provides for a Microgeneration Support Scheme (MSS) aimed at supporting the deployment of an anticipated 260megawatts of new micro renewable generation by 2030. A separate small-scale generation scheme will also come into effect to support the deployment of rooftop and ground-mounted solar photovoltaic (PV) modules in cohorts not suited to other support measures. What does this mean for businesses? While the large-scale deployment of renewables will facilitate the decarbonisation of the national energy system, a growing number of individuals are also seeking to decarbonise their own operations. Options here include: investment in energy-efficiency; corporate power purchase agreements for renewable energy; and small-scale renewable asset deployment. As a first step, businesses are advised to calculate, monitor, and report on their Scope 2 emissions. These are the indirect emissions associated with the purchase of electricity, steam, heat, and cooling. By doing this, businesses can help to identify opportunities for reducing these emissions—and it’s worth noting that improving the energy efficiency of both property portfolios and business operations is crucial here. Potential measures for reducing Scope 2 emissions include securing direct renewable energy contracts, upgrading electric systems (e.g. lighting), generating renewable energy on-site, and optimising manufacturing and production facilities. Given the ongoing volatility in energy prices, the business case for reducing these emissions has never been stronger – and, by making considered choices, businesses can also expect to save on operational costs. The decarbonisation of Ireland's electricity system, therefore, presents a potential opportunity for businesses. In addition to the potential cost savings, other benefits could include reduced exposure to energy price volatility, stakeholder alignment, regulatory compliance and improved brand perception. Laragh Musselwhite is an Analyst at KPMG Sustainable Futures.

As organisations reshape their upended supply chains, they must be aware of the tax consequences of shifting substance across jurisdictions. Deirdre Hogan explains. The centralised operating model with a single global or regional hub location has dominated the business world for many years – but, the traditional model may be about to change. Continued digitalisation, the onward march of online sales channels, increase in state-imposed trade barriers, and talent constraints brought about by COVID-19 are just some of many reasons businesses are reconsidering their operating models. The more important factors for reimagining operating models are, however, the impact of Base Erosion and Profit Sharing (BEPS) Pillar One and Pillar Two. Pillar One provides for a new means of attributing profit. Pillar Two, meanwhile, proposes the introduction of a global minimum effective tax rate. The old model The centralised operating model has served businesses well, and countries like Ireland have benefited. This old model reduces duplication of effort and functions, enabling organisations to take advantage of incentives offered by jurisdictions seeking to attract global investment. Ireland has been particularly successful in this regard over the past two decades. And yet, the efficacy of the centralised model is now being challenged by the ongoing BEPS process introduced by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Its aims include reducing the tax advantages of the old, centralised model by focusing on transparency, substance, and coherence. The result has been an increase in the cost and complexity of tax compliance for globalised organisations employing the centralised model. This, in turn, is driving these organisations to concentrate activities in larger economies. Meanwhile, should the new means of attributing profit—and the global minimum effective tax rate—be introduced, the tax advantages enjoyed by the centralised model will be further eroded. What’s the alternative? A loose definition of a multi-hub model is one in which a single, centralised structure is replaced by one with high-value business functions in multiple countries. Its potential benefits include increased agility, the ability to tap into wider and deeper talent pools in different jurisdictions, closer proximity to customers, and improved ability to customise goods and services to meet their specific needs. Furthermore, by adopting a fully distributed tax operating model to reflect this operating model—and spreading income in a more decentralised manner—an organisation may be better able to deal with future tax risk. Indeed, from a tax and talent point-of-view, organisations may have to deploy a more significant number of people, functions, and assets in certain countries to meet economic substance requirements. The multi-hub model lends itself to such actions. Supply chain resilience The fragility of highly complex global supply chains was exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Traditional just-in-time production models halted, resulting in global shortages of products ranging from cars to kiwi fruit. The response has been to increase supply chain resilience by nearshoring or onshoring. As organisations seek to reshape their supply chains, however, they must also be aware of tax consequences, ranging from corporate to indirect tax, as they shift substance across jurisdictions. Geopolitical dimensions Also driving decentralisation is the move by governments worldwide to increase trade regulation. One example is Brexit. Britain’s exit from the European Union has added a new layer of complexity to trade with the UK, which may require companies to consider establishing an in-market presence. At another level, regulations curbing the activities of overseas companies in certain markets may also require companies to establish operations with real substance in territories deemed of sufficient value to them. Sustainability matters ‘LATTE’ isn’t just a coffee drink; it is also the acronym for local, authentic, traceable, transparent, and ethical consumer products. Increasing demand for these ethically sound goods is accelerating the drive to nearshoring and onshoring – consequently furthering the move to a decentralised multi-hub business model. It is not enough to simply apply a label to a product as a means to make it appeal to ESG-conscious consumer cohorts. Businesses will need to have the right people located in-market to customise products to meet local needs and preferences. The pros and cons A fear of inadvertently increasing the effective tax rate paid by corporations has been one of the main obstacles to adopting the decentralised model. The BEPS process will all but eliminate the potential cost difference, however, while the increased focus on the taxation of income from intangibles on the part of several major economies is further reducing the perceived tax advantages of the centralised model. There are also concerns that the administration of a decentralised model may be more complex than traditional models, but arrangements can be put in place to eliminate this complexity. That said, any organisation considering a switch to a decentralised model should carry out a thorough cost-benefit analysis and business risk assessment to ensure the benefits outweigh any potential increase in cost or complexity. While the model may not suit every organisation—and is more important in some industries than others—many global businesses would benefit from the move. The switch to a multi-hub model can help organisations to build supply chain resilience while also protecting against future tax risk by enabling them to spread their income in a more decentralised manner. There are no predetermined rules for adopting a fully distributed tax operating model. Based on their individual needs, organisations need to choose how many hubs they should have, what functions should be dispersed, and where they should be based. Deirdre Hogan is Tax Partner at EY.

Since the publication of the Central Bank (Individual Accountability Framework) Bill 2021, many practical and culture changes have needed to be considered. The CBI has now provided welcome clarification on what needs to be done next. Darragh Murphy and Donal Hamilton explain. The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) recently provided clarifications on key aspects of the Central Bank (Individual Accountability Framework) Bill 2021 (IAF). The purpose of the bill is to empower the CBI with extensive regulation-making powers—particularly regarding the Senior Executive Accountability Regime (SEAR)—conduct standards and fitness and probity certifications. Fitness and probity certification The CBI’s Director General of Financial Conduct, Derville Rowland, highlighted the new IAF requirement for regulated firms to certify on an annual basis that individuals exercising a controlled function remain fit and proper. The introduction of a positive duty on firms to certify each controlled function will strengthen the focus on the responsibility of firms for the conduct of their staff and their corporate culture. Substance and form Gerry Cross, CBI Director of Financial Regulation – Policy Risk, emphasised the dynamic that exists between substance and form in the IAF and the risk of ‘juniorisation’—i.e. “where a formal title is applied to a less senior executive while the more senior person seeks to stay out of the regulatory picture.” Cross confirmed that the IAF is focused on the substance of roles rather than titles. In the case of ‘juniorisation,’ he stated that the more senior executive would be identified as the person carrying out the role and, therefore, as the person deemed to hold the relevant responsibilities under the IAF. Outsourcing and SEAR Outsourcing continues to be a key focus of analysis and implementation for the CBI, particularly with regard to its recent publication of the Cross-Industry Guidance on Outsourcing (December 2021). Cross has confirmed that the CBI expects that, where outsourcing arrangements are in place at a firm subject to SEAR, a senior executive function will be responsible for it. The outsourced role-holder will also fall under the oversight of a preapproval, controlled functions role-holder within that firm. In-scope firms will need to reflect this in the relevant statement of responsibilities and responsibility maps. Culture of regulated financial services firms and professional advisors It is not sufficient for regulated financial services firms to focus solely on their own organisation to achieve cultural change, the CBI has stated. They will also need to look at the broader landscape, which must include professional industry bodies. All participants in the financial services industry, including key legal and accountancy advisors, must play their part in the cultural transformation. This will require the conscientious professional to advise firms to comply, not only with the letter of the rules, but also with the spirit. What practical steps should firms take now? The CBI has strongly encouraged firms to take the following practical steps now: Understand and assess their obligations under the IAF Regulated firms need to understand their obligations under the IAF and assess their current governance structures to identify ownership of responsibilities and implement any necessary changes to their existing business model. Review fitness and probity processes Regulated firms should review their fitness and probity processes to assess any enhancements required to meet the annual certification requirements. Regulated firms should also consider what training and monitoring will be required to embed the proposed conduct standards as expected standards of behaviour. Examine internal culture and values Regulated firms should examine their internal culture and values as against the IAF principles more broadly. The CBI encourages regulated firms to assess how IAF principles could be reflected meaningfully in practice. Engagement Consideration should be given to effective ways of engaging with staff, customers, and other stakeholders to spread awareness of and embed standards and positive behaviours. Education and training The CBI has stated that education and training, together with consistent internal and external messaging, will play an important part in embedding standards and positive behaviours. Darragh Murphy and Donal Hamilton are Partners at McCann FitzGerald LLP.

With gender pay gap reporting on the horizon, it’s time for organisations to really examine whether they’re doing the best they can for female employees. Dawn Leane outlines 10 things every business can do to help women in the workplace. According to recent research, the advancement of women in the workplace has, at best, stalled. So, what can organisations do to get back on track? 1. Start with the culture Many organisations over-engineer initiatives to improve gender balance. This often manifests as policies and procedures, which research shows can be counter-productive and have a negative impact. Organisations should focus less on control and more on creating environments that are genuinely egalitarian. This is achieved by modelling appropriate behaviours and embedding good practice. 2. Ask questions Don’t assume you know why women are not advancing in your organisation. Issues can be specific to the culture of individual workplaces or teams. Without insight, you could spend a lot of time and money developing solutions to the wrong problems. Independent interviews with current and former employees can help build an objective picture of the challenges unique to your business. 3. Support fathers All fathers are entitled to paternity and parental leave. However, only a third took paternity leave last year. Research suggests that men and women believe fathers don’t take their full entitlement because parental leave is still viewed as the domain of women. Yet, fathers are no less interested and engaged in their children’s lives. Encouraging fathers to take leave might not do much for your individual organisation, but this is a wider issue for business and society and will contribute to higher staff retention and satisfaction. 4. Don’t outsource management responsibility A survey by the 30% Club found that employees spend increasingly less time with their manager discussing their personal development as they progress through the organisation. Opportunities for career-relevant advice and feedback are outsourced to mentors or coaches. Women at this stage of their career receive less advice from their manager than men by a ratio of four to one. While mentors and coaches have a role, it is the relationship with their manager that is pivotal to women’s development. 5. Provide access to gender-specific training This can be a divisive topic, but research shows that women benefit enormously from gender-specific training. The chance to discuss common experiences, like gender bias or personal leadership challenges, is key. However, it is important to ensure that management doesn’t wipe their hands after offering this kind of training. Other types of development opportunities should also be offered to women. 6. Create dress rehearsals Developing leadership abilities takes practice and requires learning from mistakes. With low levels of women in senior roles, those who do succeed have increased visibility. Organisations can create space for women to enhance their leadership skills without being subject to undue scrutiny. Opportunities such as leading projects or deputising for their managers, when coupled with appropriate feedback, can help to provide such a ‘safe’ space. 7. Reduce the opportunity for unconscious bias In organisations, even the smallest amount of bias can have significant consequences. Unconscious bias is prevalent in both women and men. The Implicit Bias Test developed at Harvard University offers incredible personal insight. Training for unconscious bias has proven to be largely ineffective. Until our conditioning changes, the solution is to limit the opportunity for such bias to occur. For example, blind, systematic processes for reviewing job applications will help to end such bias. 8. Monitor where women are in your talent pipeline The McKinsey Women in the Workplace reports advise that, for women, inequality starts at the very first promotion; entry-level women are 18 percent less likely to be promoted than their male peers. This has a dramatic effect on the pipeline as a whole. Organisations should be attuned to this, as it is easier to correct imbalance at earlier stages in the pipeline. 9. Accept that careers are marathons, not sprints Organisations often place too much emphasis on rapid advancement, leading people to burn out and leave, particularly when they have competing demands outside work. Reframing career development as a long-term goal allows both women and men to increase and to slow their pace as appropriate to their circumstances without being written off. 10. Focus on output not presenteeism If accountability and results are what matter, show this through flexible working arrangements. Hybrid working has been both a blessing and a curse to women in the workplace. Flexibility is necessary to ensure women continue to be productive and successful members of the team. Dawn Leane is the Founder of Leane Empower.