Organisational practices and culture often drive workplace conflicts. Ian Brinkley examines the impact of conflict and how it can be resolved and prevented in the future The modern workplace is often a place of harmonious or at least tolerable relationships, but sometimes things go wrong. Ranging from one-off tiffs to more serious and systematic incidents, conflict can occur even in the best run workplace. In early 2024, the Chartered Institute for Personnel Development (CIPD) conducted a large-scale workplace survey in the UK focused on the incidence, impact and resolution of conflict. What is conflict? According to the survey, conflict included feeling humiliated or undermined at work, being shouted at or in a heated argument, verbal abuse, unfair allegations, sexual and physical harassment, intimidation and assault and discrimination for a protected characteristic such as race, gender, disability or age. (The survey question did not mention religion.) About 25 percent of the UK workforce reported at least one form of conflict in the preceding 12 months. The most common conflicts involved being humiliated or undermined at work, being shouted at, followed by verbal abuse and discrimination linked to a protected characteristic. The most serious incidents, such as sexual and physical assault were thankfully rare. Most attention focuses on formal processes such as industrial tribunals, grievances and mediation as a means to resolve disputes. However, in practice, very few reported conflicts ever make it to this stage – just one percent ended up in employment tribunals, for example. The most common reactions are informal. About half of those who reported conflict reported that they let it go. Involving managers and HR was the second most common way of resolving conflict. Unresolved conflict About two-thirds of conflicts are either fully or partially resolved. However, one-third are not resolved at all. Unresolved conflicts may not be escalated because they are not serious enough, especially “one-offs”, or because people fear the repercussions if they do. The survey does not tell us directly which is more likely, though evidence on the impact of the conflict suggests the former is more common. Most people who reported conflict also said they had good working relations with managers and colleagues. However, they were more negative when it came to specific actions – for example, whether they were always treated fairly. We think this apparent contradiction is down to people making a distinction between working relations in general and specific incidents. Conflict also had relatively little impact on voluntary effort. Those who reported conflict were almost as likely to say they were willing to work harder than they needed to in order to help their organisation and just as likely to say they would help colleagues under pressure or make innovative suggestions. However, we do find a clear negative association between conflict and a range of other indicators of the quality of work. For example, those who report conflict are much more likely to say work had adversely affected their mental health and that they experienced excessive workloads and work pressures most or all of the time. We cannot tell from the survey whether the conflict was the cause of these negative impacts or whether workplaces, where work quality was already poor, are more likely to suffer conflict. Both are likely to be true. A decrease in workplace conflict The survey asked about conflict in 2019 and since then there has been a significant decrease from 30 to 25 percent of the workforce. There are, however, two important caveats. First, the improvement was largely confined to older white males in permanent, higher-skill white-collar jobs without disabilities. There was little or no improvement for the young; those in temporary or zero-hours jobs and short-hour contracts or those with disabilities, ethnic minorities and women. Non-heterosexual workers also saw less conflict over this period, but it still remains at a high level. In 2024, the latter groups reported significantly higher levels of conflict than the former, and since 2019 that gap has widened. Second, the fall in conflict has also been greatest for those groups that saw the biggest rise in home-working. Those who work at home are less likely to report conflicts such as being shouted at or subject to verbal abuse. Reducing workplace conflict No strategy to improve the quality of work can fully succeed unless the incidence of conflict is reduced, especially among the “left behind” groups. Improving the relative bargaining power of those who are more likely to report conflict may help. Legislative change focusing on formal dispute resolution may be justified but is unlikely to make much difference to the overall incidence of workplace conflict. The biggest impact is going to be from organisational practice. Improving work quality in workplaces with below-average work quality is an obvious priority, but even well-run organisations can suffer conflict. In both cases, mitigating some of the underlying causes of conflict, such as excessive workload combined with helping line managers manage conflict better in the future, will be required if progress is to be made over the next five years. Ian Brinkley is a labour market economist

As businesses navigate technological disruptions, economic fluctuations and global crises, leaders must prioritise investing in resilience, writes Neil Hughes Resilience is defined as the ability to adapt to change positively, recover from difficulties and persist in facing challenges. The pace of change in business today is relentless, and for business leaders, resilience is a more crucial attribute than ever. Organisations need leaders capable of staying focused, being consistent and remaining inclusive under pressure. Building a resilient workforce can help organisations to navigate change more effectively, sustaining competitive advantage, growth and long-term success. Best practice suggests several key areas of focus for leaders and organisations to consider. Prioritising wellbeing and mental health According to a 2023 survey by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 76 percent of UK employees reported that mental health support at work directly contributes to their overall job satisfaction. Mental health is foundational to resilience. Business leaders should strive to create a supportive environment that prioritises mental health through comprehensive wellness programmes. This includes providing access to mental health professionals and resilience tools to support employees in managing stress and adapting to change. Encouraging open conversations about mental health can foster a culture where employees feel safe and supported. Fostering a resilient and inclusive team culture Resilience should be embedded within the organisational culture. Leaders must foster a workplace culture that encourages collaboration, open communication and psychological safety, where small wins are recognised, feedback is encouraged and acted on and failures are seen as learning opportunities rather than setbacks. Creating an inclusive culture where diverse perspectives are valued can enhance problem-solving and innovation. Regular team-building activities, training focused on resilience, and creating a safe space for employees to voice their concerns can significantly boost team morale and cohesion. Investing in continuous learning and development Continuous learning is critical to building a resilient workforce. By investing in ongoing training and development programmes, leaders can equip employees with the skills needed to adapt to new challenges. Offering opportunities for professional growth helps employees stay current and confident in their roles. Encouraging a growth mindset, where challenges are seen as opportunities for learning, can foster resilience and innovation. Role modelling resilience and self-care To lead effectively, business leaders need to invest in their own wellbeing and resilience. Resilient leaders are those who continuously learn, adapt, and maintain their physical and mental health. This involves regular training, seeking coaching or mentorship, and embracing a growth mindset. Leaders who prioritise self-care practices such as regular exercise, adequate sleep, and mindfulness activities can manage stress more effectively, maintaining mental agility. . Leaders play a critical role in modelling resilience and those leaders who prioritise resilience not only enhance their capacity to grow and move forward in the face of adversity but also inspire their teams to do the same. Whilst building resilience involves effort, commitment and time, it can be the protective layer required to equip leaders, their teams and organisations to face the challenges of the ever-changing landscape of work. Neil Hughes is a Director in People and Change Consulting at Grant Thornton Northern Ireland

Sandra Healy explains the importance of a strong organisational culture and how it can lead to satisfied and long-term employees Organisational culture is the personality of the organisation, shaping how employees interact with each other, management and customers. A strong organisational culture can have a significant impact on employee retention because it creates a sense of belonging and purpose. When employees feel that they are part of a community that shares their values and goals, they are more likely to stay with the company for the long term.  A positive organisational culture can also lead to greater employee engagement. When employees feel that their work is meaningful and that they are making a difference, they are more likely to be motivated and productive. This can lead to better business outcomes, such as increased revenue and customer satisfaction.  On the other hand, a negative organisational culture can have the opposite effect. If employees feel that they are not valued or that their contributions are not recognised, they may become disengaged and demotivated leading to high turnover rates.  Organisational culture can impact employee retention in other ways, as well. A strong culture of work-life balance can help employees feel that they are able to maintain a healthy balance between their personal and professional lives. Similarly, a culture of learning and development can help employees feel that they are growing and developing professionally.  Key components to a good organisational culture  A strong organisational culture is built on a foundation of shared values and beliefs that guide the behaviour of employees. These values and beliefs are communicated through various channels, such as company mission statements, vision statements, and core values. When employees understand and embrace these values, they are more likely to feel a sense of belonging and purpose within the organisation.  Another key component of a strong organisational culture is effective communication. Leaders who communicate regularly and transparently with their employees can help to build trust and foster a sense of community within the organisation. Employee recognition and appreciation are also important components of a strong organisational culture. When employees feel that their contributions are valued and recognised, they are more likely to feel motivated and engaged in their work. Finally, a strong organisational culture is one that promotes work-life balance and employee well-being. When employees feel that their personal needs and well-being are valued by the organisation, they are more likely to feel satisfied and committed to their work. Measuring organisational culture Measuring the current organisational culture can be done through various methods: Surveys can be distributed to employees to gather their opinions on the company's values, communication, leadership, and overall culture. Interviews with key personnel such as managers and executives can provide insight into the company's goals and how they align with the culture. Focus groups can also be conducted to gather opinions from a diverse group of employees. These methods can help identify areas where the company's culture is strong and where it needs improvement.  Another way to measure the organisational culture is to look at employee turnover rates. High turnover rates can indicate a negative or toxic culture, while low turnover rates can indicate a positive and supportive culture. Exit interviews can also provide valuable feedback on why employees are leaving and what can be improved to retain them.  Once the current organisational culture has been measured, the company can identify areas for improvement by analysing the data collected from surveys, interviews, focus groups, employee turnover and exit interviews, then create an action plan to address the areas that need improvement. Improving the organisational culture is an ongoing process. The company should regularly measure the culture and make adjustments as needed. This will help ensure that the culture remains strong and supportive, leading to greater employee engagement and retention.  Best practice One of the best practices for building a positive and inclusive organisational culture is to establish a clear set of values and principles that guide the organisation's actions and decisions and then communicated to all employees and integrated into all aspects of the company's operations. Organisations must also encourage open communication and collaboration among employees by engaging everyone in regular team-building activities, open-door policies, and opportunities for feedback and input. When employees feel that their voices are heard and their contributions are valued, they are more likely to feel invested in the success of the organisation and less likely to seek opportunities elsewhere.  Creating a supportive and inclusive work environment is also crucial for building a positive organisational culture. This means promoting diversity and inclusivity in all aspects of the workplace, from hiring practices to daily interactions among employees. Finally, it is important to create formal recognition programs, such as employee of the month awards or performance bonuses, as well as through informal gestures such as thank-you notes or public praise. When employees feel that their hard work and dedication are appreciated, they are more likely to feel motivated and committed to the organisation over the long term.  Sandra Healy is Founder of Inclusio

The Institute’s latest thought leadership papers outline a series of measures needed to support Ireland’s SMEs, write Cróna Clohisey and Michael Diviney. The Institute has published the latest in its series of thought leadership papers. Supporting SMEs was informed by the views of our 33,000 members and sets out the measures that we believe are needed to achieve strategic, systemic improvements for SMEs operating across Ireland. SMEs make up the vast majority of all businesses in Ireland, and collectively they employ close to seven out of 10 people working in the business economy. It is clear from engagement with members that a critical marker of Ireland’s future economic success will be supporting our SME sector by reducing the cost and complexity of doing business. SMEs have faced an unprecedented number of new legislative requirements in recent months which significantly adds to their cost and administrative burden. In 2024 alone, the minimum wage has increased by 12 percent and additional sick leave entitlements have added one percent to payroll costs. From 1 October, the rate of Employer, Self-Employed and Employee PRSI will increase by 0.1 percent, while pensions auto-enrolment will add a further 1.5 percent in costs during 2025. Supporting SMEs calls on the Government to be cognisant of the challenges all of the above brings. While the measures are extremely important for employees, consideration must be given to the timing of implementing new employment law, and the impact on SMEs when all are introduced within a short timeframe. The paper sets out a series of proposals, grouped under four headings: Resilience and growth; Government supports and funding; Sources of business finance; and Reducing the cost of business through the tax system. Alleviating the administrative and cost burden for SMEs is at the forefront of our asks which include the following proposals: Minimum wage workers, working a full week, should be exempted from Employers’ PRSI. Tax discrimination against professional service companies must end so that they can benefit from the various investment reliefs available to comparable trading companies. Reducing Capital Gains Tax from 33 percent to 25 percent to stimulate business and personal transactions that will bring additional funds into the Exchequer. The real time reporting requirement for enhanced reporting requirements (ERR) for employers should be removed and replaced with monthly or even annual returns. Additionally, we ask for a commitment from Government not to extend ERR for at least three years until the system is embedded and an appropriate cost-benefit analysis of the current system has been properly completed. Chartered Accountants Ireland believes that more resilient businesses will be better positioned to weather crises and uncertainty, and have confidence to invest, to scale, and to create employment. Financial stability is paramount to this. The Institute is calling on Government to support SMEs in accessing finance, optimising governance structures, and investing in developing their workforces. Proposed measures to ensure resilience and the continued growth of this vital sector of the economy include: Widening the eligibility criteria for the broad range of grants available to include more ‘traditional’ industries and the service sector. Ensuring more consistent availability of grants and supports nationwide. Our members tell us that services provided in one part of the country may not be available to similar businesses elsewhere; much depends on the approach and funding at a local level. With the advent of remote working, a common approach to supporting all small businesses, regardless of location, is needed. Promoting healthy competition in the business lending market, by enhancing the role community-based lenders and alternative lenders can play in addition to the pillar banks. It is well documented that record corporation tax receipts will not always be with us and there is a strategic imperative to ensure long-term economic health for SMEs. This can only come from understanding the unique challenges facing them, not simply by virtue of their size, but also specific to the sector they operate in, and supports they need. CCAB-I’s Pre-Budget 2025 submission focuses on supporting and sustaining our SME sector Continuing the focus on the importance of the SME contribution to the Irish economy, the Institute, under the auspices of the CCAB-I, delivered its pre-Budget 2025 submission to Minister McGrath last month. The paper highlights the constraints experienced by SMEs as a result of increasing labour costs and also states that a lack of supply of housing and childcare places, in addition to high personal tax rates, are making it increasingly difficult for people to live and work affordably in Ireland. The submission identifies four key areas for budgetary focus: support SMEs by exempting minimum wage workers from employers’ PRSI and simplifying tax legislation; increase the number of childcare places available and offer working parents a €1,000 tax credit to return to the workforce; introduce a 30 percent intermediate rate of income tax to retain and attract workers and help people live affordably; continue to stimulate and support the completion of new houses. The CCAB-I believes that Ireland’s tax code has become increasingly complex in recent years and is calling for simplification of the tax rules to support businesses, enable them to grow and also ensure that Ireland remains competitive on an international stage. Childcare provision In terms of childcare, the submission includes measures to improve the supply of childcare places for pre-school children. To address the impact of working parents leaving the workforce following the birth of their children on the labour supply, the CCAB-I is calling for the introduction of a €1,000 tax credit for working parents to encourage them to return to the workforce. The CCAB-I also asks that the government plans for adequate capacity in the childcare sector by analysing local needs and ensuring adequate funding for the sector. Income tax reforms The CCAB-I believes that introducing a third rate of income tax of 30 percent would make the system more equitable. Workers in Ireland pay income tax at a rate of 40 percent once they earn €42,000. This entry point is below the average wage and is significantly lower than most countries across the UK and Europe, where incidentally having more than two tax rates is extremely common. We are a mobile profession where many are in the early stages of their careers and are planning their futures. Introducing an intermediate 30 percent rate would make the system more attractive and more equitable, lessening the tax burden on workers and putting more money in their pockets. Housing measures The submission proposes: extending the Help-to-Buy Scheme by two years to 31 December 2027; abolishing vacant homes tax; increasing the rent-a-room relief from €14,000 to €20,000 and removing the cliff-edge; abolishing the non-resident landlord withholding tax system. Cróna Clohisey is Acting Director of Advocacy and Voice at Chartered Accountants Ireland Michael Diviney is Head of Thought Leadership at Chartered Accountants Ireland.

CEOs are leveraging M&A for tech-driven growth and market expansion, embodying innovation and sustainability in a dynamic business landscape, explains Fergal McAleavey In the rapidly evolving business landscape of 2024, global CEOs continue to use mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to navigate innovation and transformation across their businesses.  The latest CEO Outlook Pulse Survey from EY shows businesses are engaging in M&A activity with renewed vigour, considering it a strategic support for addressing key priorities. The survey found that acquiring technology, new production capabilities and innovative startups, growing market share and accessing new geographies stood out as the top three strategic drivers for CEOs pursuing M&A. Irish M&A: growth and innovation In Ireland, the M&A landscape is particularly vibrant, with CEOs and investors showing a keen interest in a variety of transaction opportunities, from trade sales to private equity investment to strategic alliances. Ireland's thriving tech sector and business-friendly climate have fuelled a boom in deal-making, outpacing the UK and EU. This is likely to continue as companies pursue innovative technologies and seek to capitalise on the entrepreneurial energy of startups that have scaled. The strategic imperatives for Irish M&A are expected to align with global patterns, emphasising the acquisition of larger market shares, expansion into new markets, and the integration of advanced technology into existing operations. This is especially pertinent for Ireland, given its status as a European tech hub.  Ensuring strategic objectives are met CEOs are also signalling their readiness to streamline their portfolios, shedding assets to address ESG goals and refine their focus for the challenges ahead. Sustainability due diligence is playing an ever-increasing role in M&A transactions to assist buyers and sellers to ensure that those deals are aligned with their own corporate sustainability objectives. This strategic deal-making is not merely a short-term solution but is part of a broader, long-term vision to build resilience and adaptability for an unpredictable future. Irish CEOs' strategy With global funding markets more receptive in 2024, Irish acquirers may find it easier to secure financing for deals and may be the target of larger companies seeking to expand their geographic footprint or product offering. However, they must remain cautious of potential market tightening as political events unfold. For those looking to divest, the market's increasing appetite for acquisitions and the continued resurgence of private equity (PE) could provide favourable conditions. Nonetheless, the timing of PE's full-fledged return to the M&A space remains a little uncertain for large transactions as they await potential interest rate decreases, particularly in the Eurozone and the UK. Irish companies must stay attuned to shifts in monetary policy that could influence the M&A landscape.  To provide corporate sellers with more control over M&A transactions, particularly as a counter-measure to lengthy deal timelines that have become a feature of the M&A market in the last few years, time is well spent by those sellers preparing potential divestment assets for sale, including anticipating issues of particular relevance to likely buyers of those assets and identifying potential regulatory approval requirements that may add to longer deal timelines. Sell-side due diligence of prospective buyers can also be warranted to help flush out any potential roadblocks or delays that may arise from ever-increasing competition law, foreign direct investment and foreign state aid regime requirements.  The M&A momentum for the remaining months of 2024 is characterised by strategic foresight, adaptability, and a commitment to sustainability, as both global and Irish corporate leaders and investors navigate the complexities of a rapidly evolving business world. Fergal McAleavey is Partner of Corporate Finance – Strategy and Transactions at EY

After a decade of little change, the tax regime for research and development in the UK has undergone a ‘credit style’ revamp, writes Liam McHenry  New research and development (R&D) rules for businesses in the UK with an accounting period beginning on or after 1 April 2024 have commenced. These entities are within the remit of the newly merged, research and development expenditure credit (REDC) expenditure scheme – with the exception of “highly R&D-intensive companies”. Companies with over 30 percent of their yearly expenditure qualifying for R&D tax relief can still claim under a restricted version of the SME scheme. Given this high bar, however, it is likely that only small technology start-ups will qualify.  For everyone else, the new rate will provide a benefit worth about 15p per £1 of qualifying expenditure, so not all is lost for those exiting the SME scheme, as a generous tax incentive remains for potential claimants. Reduced complexity? The stated aim of the merged scheme is to reduce complexity for claimants and their advisors. With two schemes remaining post-merger, however, the new scheme is actually more complex than its predecessor.  Subcontracted expenditure had previously been excluded under the RDEC scheme in any meaningful way. Under the new merged scheme, a new system has been put in place with the aim of rewarding whichever party decides to undertake the R&D activity. This adds a new dimension to determining the eligibility of qualifying R&D expenditure insofar as a subcontractor will now need to determine whether they believe their customer knew in advance that a project would require R&D activity. The theory is that this approach will remove the potential for both parties to claim on the same project, but it is easy to see how ambiguity might arise. When agreeing the terms of contracts with customers, claimants must pay additional attention to any clauses relating to intellectual property (IP) generation and whether they indicate that R&D will be required. Taking care at this stage could help claimants identify and preserve their right to claim the corresponding tax relief. Overseas expenditure A restriction on overseas expenditure was also introduced on 1 April 2024. Unless there is a compelling reason why the expenditure could not reasonably have been incurred in the UK, it will not be eligible for inclusion in the claim. However, recognising the unique position of Northern Ireland and its significant integration with the neighbouring Republic of Ireland, claimants can bypass this new restriction. By doing so, they could gain up to a maximum additional benefit of £250,000 every three years. This may require some additional administration, but it is still a welcome reprieve from the restriction, which would have been costly. Increased scrutiny This article offers a summary of the main rule changes coming into effect this month. In reality, there are more of which claimants should be aware. His Majesty's Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has dramatically increased its compliance efforts, with recent revelations from the Public Affairs Committee indicating that upwards of 20 percent of new R&D claims are now under scrutiny. While this fact alone should not be a major concern, it is worth noting that this increased scrutiny often comes with an aggressive stance, beginning with the assumption that R&D claims should be disallowed. The experience of one claimant to another can dramatically vary depending on which caseworker is allocated to the enquiry. Regardless, opening an enquiry can be a prolonged process before a conclusion can be reached. In the event of an unsuccessful enquiry defence, HMRC will be obligated to consider whether any penalties should be levied, depending on whether they determine that the claim was prepared carelessly. In addition, depending on the level of disclosure provided in previous claims made in recent years, HMRC can (and is actively encouraged to) look into these previous claims beyond the normal enquiry window. Planning ahead The implementation of the new R&D tax rules marks a significant shift for businesses heavily reliant on R&D activities for growth and innovation. As businesses adapt to the new regime, strategic planning and collaboration with tax advisors will be essential in maximising the benefits. Liam McHenry is Director of Tax at Grant Thornton