Advocating for yourself at work is vital, especially if you're a neurodivergent person. Antje Derks explains how to navigate workplace challenges and secure the support you need Advocating for yourself in the workplace can be challenging for anyone, but it can be especially daunting for those who are neurodivergent. Neurodivergence encompasses a range of conditions, including autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia and other cognitive differences that affect how individuals think, learn and interact with the world. While these differences can bring unique strengths to the workplace, they can also create specific needs and challenges. Understanding how to ask for reasonable accommodations and advocate for yourself is crucial for thriving in your professional environment. Neurodivergent individuals often have distinct ways of processing information, communicating and completing tasks. These differences can be assets, bringing innovative perspectives and problem-solving skills to a team. The traditional workplace environment may not always be conducive to neurodivergent work styles, however, leading to potential misunderstandings and obstacles. Workplace challenges Neurodivergent individuals often face specific challenges in the workplace. Sensory sensitivities, such as noise, lighting or office layouts, can overwhelm a neurodivergent brain, leading to overstimulation. Organisational and time management difficulties can also arise, as can challenges with social interactions and communication. Many neurodivergent colleagues appreciate clear, explicit instructions and feedback. The more precise and direct the language, the better. While this approach works well for many, it's important to remember that neurodivergence varies greatly from person to person. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Self-advocacy Self-advocacy involves understanding your own needs and communicating them effectively to others. For neurodivergent individuals, self-advocacy is essential for creating a work environment that supports their success. Here are key steps to advocate for yourself effectively. Familiarise yourself with workplace policies and legal protections related to disabilities In many countries, laws provide the right to reasonable accommodations. Take time to reflect on your specific needs and how certain accommodations can help you perform your job better. This might include flexible work hours, noise-cancelling headphones or written instructions for tasks. Schedule a meeting with your manager or HR representative to discuss your needs. Prepare to explain your neurodivergence in a way that highlights both your strengths and the challenges you face. Remember to use clear and specific language when requesting accommodations. For example, instead of saying, "I need a quieter workspace," you might say, "I need a desk in a quieter area of the office to help me concentrate better." It is important to try and frame your requests in a way that shows you are looking for solutions that benefit both you and the company. Emphasise how the adjustments will help you to be more productive and contribute effectively to the team by suggesting reasonable accommodations that are specific and actionable. For example, "Can I have a standing desk to help me stay focused?" or "Can we have a weekly check-in meeting to ensure I am on track with my projects?" will show your manager that you are actively seeking to take responsibility for yourself rather than shifting all the expectation on to them. Make reasonable adjustments depending on your needs Reasonable adjustments vary depending on individual needs and job requirements. Flexible work arrangements, such as remote work, flexible hours or modified schedules, can help manage sensory overload and align work with peak productivity times. Assistive technology, including speech-to-text software, organisational apps or noise-cancelling headphones, can aid concentration and efficiency. Physical workspace adjustments, like a quieter workspace, a standing desk or specific lighting, can create a more comfortable and productive environment. Structured communication, with clear, written instructions and regular feedback, ensures understanding and proper task execution, while regular check-ins can provide ongoing support and clarification. Additionally, access to a mentor or job coach who understands neurodiversity can offer valuable support and guidance. Monitor the effectiveness of the adjustments Communicate with your manager or HR about how well (or not) the adjustments are working for you. If things need tweaking slightly, don't hesitate to request them. Keep records Keep a record of your communications and any agreements made. This documentation can be helpful if you need to revisit the discussion or if there are any disputes. Promoting an inclusive workplace culture Advocating for yourself is an important step, but fostering a more inclusive workplace culture requires broader efforts from the whole organisation. Employers and colleagues can contribute by promoting awareness and understanding of neurodiversity through training and education, as well as encouraging open dialogue about individual needs and adjustments. But most importantly, it is about helping to create a supportive environment where all employees feel valued and included – whether they’re neurodivergent or not. By advocating for yourself and working towards a more inclusive workplace, you can not only enhance your own job satisfaction and performance but also contribute to a diverse and dynamic work environment where everyone's unique strengths are recognised and valued. Antje Derks is a Marketing Executive with Chartered Accountants Worldwide

The ethical use of AI and how it is governed today and as it continues to evolve in the years ahead is top of mind for many in the profession. Accountancy Ireland asks three Chartered Accountants for their take on the ethics of AI Owen Lewis  Head of AI and Management Consulting KPMG in Ireland It is crucial for all of us in the profession to ensure the integrity and transparency of solutions driven by artificial intelligence (AI).  We must audit and validate AI algorithms to ensure they comply with regulatory standards and ethical guidelines. Monitoring systems for biases and inaccuracies is also crucial to ensuring that financial data and decisions remain fair and reliable. By providing independent oversight, we can help to maintain trust in AI-driven financial processes and outcomes for clients.  Where AI is used to inform large-scale decisions, it should be supplemented with significant governance measures, such as explainability, transparency, human oversight, data quality and model robustness and performance requirements. This technology is continuing to advance rapidly, and we need to be open to both its current and potential capabilities.  By putting the correct governance mechanisms and controls in place – beginning with low-risk test applications and building from there – organisations can adopt AI safely and obtain real benefits from its use. I am working with organisations to help them think through what AI means for them, develop strategies for its adoption, put the necessary governance and controls in place, scale solutions sensibly and ensure business leaders get real value from their investment.  Whatever their goal may be – more efficient operations, accelerated content generation or improved engagement with stakeholders – we help organisations decide if AI can help, and if it can, how to use it in the right way. >Bob Semple Experienced Director Governance and Risk Management Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most misunderstood, yet transformative, technologies impacting the way we work today. Here are 10 essential steps Chartered Accountants should take to navigate the landscape of AI effectively. Take a leadership role – If we don’t take the lead, we risk missing the golden opportunity AI presents. Conduct an AI “stocktake” –According to a recent Microsoft survey, 75 percent of employees are already using AI. Identifying current AI usage within your organisation is essential. Assess the downside risks of AI – Legislative and regulatory requirements are exploding (e.g. NIS 2, the AI Act, DORA and more) and risks abound (AI bias, explainability, privacy, IP, GDPR, cyber security, resilience, misuse, model drift and more). Organisations must act on their AI responsibilities. Conduct a dataset stocktake – Just as the Y2K challenge was about identifying IT systems, today’s challenge is to catalogue all datasets, as these are crucial for AI functionality. Draft appropriate policies and procedures – Establish clear responsibilities and accountability for AI initiatives. Pay special attention to how AI impacts decision-making processes. Strengthen data curation – Implement new processes to improve how data is collected and used. Identify opportunities for the smart use of AI – Brainstorm and prioritise AI use-cases that can drive efficiency and innovation. Provide training – Ensure that board members, management and staff are all adequately trained on AI principles and applications. Manage the realisation of benefits – Safeguard against excessive costs and subpar returns by carefully managing the implementation of AI projects. Update audit and assurance approaches – Seek independent assurance on AI applications and leverage AI to enhance risk, control and audit processes. As we adopt AI, it is critical that we pay particular attention to distorted agency – i.e. giving too much agency to, or relying unduly on, AI outputs and doubting our own agency to make the most important decisions. Exercising professional judgement is the key to minimising the risks associated with AI and realising its benefits, and that surely is the strength of every Chartered Accountant. *Note: GPT4 was used to assist in drafting this article.   Níall Fitzgerald Head of Ethics and Governance Chartered Accountants Ireland Artificial intelligence (AI) is proving to be transformative, impacting competitiveness and how business is done.  Chartered Accountants Ireland has engaged with members working in various finance and C-suite positions, including chief executives, chief financial officers and board members, to understand how AI is impacting their day-to-day work.  One thing is clear. AI is being used in some shape or form in many businesses across the country.  In 2023, the Institute’s response to the UK’s Financial Reporting Council proposals on introducing governance requirements for the use of AI noted several governance mechanisms that are likely to be impacted by AI currently or in the very near future in many organisations.  We highlighted the focus on corporate purpose and how market forces, emerging threats and opportunities driven by AI, may challenge the purpose of an organisation and its long-term objectives.  AI may impact how organisations decide on their strategic focus in terms of how they deliver their product or service and, indeed, how their product or service is designed in the first instance.  It may also impact these organisations’ values as they consider how to deploy and use AI in an ethical manner. The EU AI Act, which enters into force on 1 August 2024 over a phased basis, introduces requirements for the development of codes of conducts, risk and impact assessments and staff training to ensure adequate human oversight around the use of AI systems within organisations. This has specific resonance for Chartered Accountants who are members of a profession bound by a code of ethics governing objectivity, confidentiality, integrity, professional behaviour and competence and due care. Chartered Accountants must now ensure that they understand how AI uses, analyses and then outputs data.  Organisations must ensure that any AI-driven information they share, and how they deploy the technology itself, satisfies principles of integrity, honesty and transparency.  Chartered Accountants are well-positioned, with their ethical mindsets, to ensure the integrity of AI systems, and their use within organisations.

Cormac Lucey explores the misunderstood roots of Ireland’s FDI success and questionable management of surging tax revenues against the backdrop of rising state spending Two important aspects of Ireland’s multinational success story are generally misunderstood.  The first concerns the low-tax strategy that has been the key reason many multinationals have located in Ireland.  As Professor Frank Barry of Trinity College Dublin revealed in his essay “Foreign Investment and the Politics of Export Profits Tax Relief 1956”, this low-tax strategy resulted from then Taoiseach John A. Costello overruling the Department of Finance and forcing an idea promoted by the Department of Industry and Commerce into the Budget.  Underlining the precariousness and capriciousness of life, this strategy didn’t begin to really function until the 1990s.  The second aspect of our multinational story, not generally understood, is how utterly dependent our economy is on American business.  While it is widely known that more than 85 percent of the state’s corporation tax revenues come from multinationals, their contribution to other tax headings is not so well-known.  When you consider multinationals’ 55 percent share of Ireland’s income taxes and 54 percent share of VAT – and apply this lower 54 percent rate to other tax headings – you will see that the multinational sector contributes over 60 percent of the State’s total tax revenues.  How well is the state managing the resulting surge in tax revenues? Well, it’s all being spent, and then some.  According to the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council’s Fiscal Assessment Report published in June 2024, “Excluding excess corporation tax receipts, a deficit of €2.7 billion (0.9% GNI) is forecast for this year. This comes despite a strong economy, with record high employment and historically low unemployment. The question arises: if underlying surpluses are not being run now that the economy is strong, when would they be run?” The quality of much of this spending is highly questionable. The epicentre of rampant State spending growth is occurring in healthcare. A recent Department of Health report analysed hospital activity and expenditure between 2016 and 2022.  It reported a 3.8 percent increase in overall activity, compared with an inflation-adjusted rise in expenditure of 45 percent (nominal rise of 68 percent) and a 29 percent increase in staffing numbers. The Department of Health badly needs budgetary incontinence pads. Or maybe members of the Irish public service simply need to learn how to manage.  Consequence-free management is the key obstacle to effective budgetary control. When staff are treated the same regardless of whether they perform extraordinarily well or extraordinarily badly, should we be surprised when mediocrity results?  The Republic’s governing political class is happy to bask in the reflected glory of multinational-induced prosperity. However, according to the 2023 annual report from the IDA, Ireland’s inward investment agency, the global foreign direct investment landscape is becoming “increasingly challenging and complex.”  And, if he becomes the next US President, Donald Trump plans to significantly undermine Ireland’s attractiveness to US multinationals by putting a 10 percent tariff on US imports. Even though it accounts for 69 percent of employment, Ireland’s domestic sector of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is the orphan of this story. SMEs need targeted tax incentives along the lines of those outlined by Deloitte’s Kim Doyle in the Accountancy Ireland newsletter Briefly. The SME sector also needs a systematic programme to reduce the regulatory burden imposed upon it. Under the guidance of Michael Diviney, Chartered Accountants Ireland recently published Reducing Red Tape, a detailed position paper showing just how that could be done.  The instinctive mindset of government – that ministers are in charge of a great national trainset they can play with at will – flies in the face of the reality that policy decisions involve tricky trade-offs not amenable to facile headlines.  Cormac Lucey is an economic commentator and lecturer at Chartered Accountants Ireland *Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column published in the August/September 2024 issue of Accountancy Ireland are the author’s own. The views of contributors to Accountancy Ireland may differ from official Institute policies and do not reflect the views of Chartered Accountants Ireland, its Council, its committees, or the editor.